<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:24:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Questions &#38; answers and more questions about O&#8217;s massive mortgage entitelement</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-625770</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Questions &#38; answers and more questions about O&#8217;s massive mortgage entitelement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-625770</guid>
		<description>[...] questions I had when Mitch McConnell proposed the GOP&#8217;s moronic mortgage entitlement plan two weeks ago: Question: Why should government be guaranteeing mortgages? Isn’t that what got us into trouble [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] questions I had when Mitch McConnell proposed the GOP&#8217;s moronic mortgage entitlement plan two weeks ago: Question: Why should government be guaranteeing mortgages? Isn’t that what got us into trouble [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Message to Senate GOP: Stop propping up the housing market; Update: Taxpayer groups line up against McConnell/Ensign/Graham mortgage entitlement</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-612377</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Message to Senate GOP: Stop propping up the housing market; Update: Taxpayer groups line up against McConnell/Ensign/Graham mortgage entitlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-612377</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle  Posted in: Subprime crisis, fiscal stimulus  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments (33)&#160;&#160;&#160;trackbacks (2) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle  Posted in: Subprime crisis, fiscal stimulus  Send to a Friend Printer Friendly   comments (33)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;trackbacks (2) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; No, no, no: Oppose the disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-611579</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; No, no, no: Oppose the disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-611579</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; No, no, no: Oppose the disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-611578</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; No, no, no: Oppose the disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-611578</guid>
		<description>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sen. McConnell proposes more Big Government to fix Big Government debacle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610749</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610749</guid>
		<description>On February 3rd, 2009 at 8:36 am, FilmLadd said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Bill, I have David Vitter and Bobby Jindal in my state.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Jindal has been booted around as a RINO here. Not sure about vitter.

&lt;blockquote&gt; The one I am trying to get out of representing LA is Mary Landrieu, a true eltist collectivist if every there was one.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Best luck. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;And yes I have contacted Mitch McConnell and quite a few other representatives. I yell at them, send emails, letters, etc.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Good. That&#039;s a few of us. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;But yelling at some intern weinie on the phone doesn’t do much good. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s a start. It is also what we are down to. 
My point was that things are going to get worse until &quot;conservatives&quot; get moving. You, Danceswithdachshunds and I are not going to be able to a whole lot but everyone calling, writing, etc will. It has before. The other side is organized to do it and where moveon.org is running ads the calls are about even. (At least in Maine) 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;. Certainly not as much as running someone AGAINST their boss. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Fantastic. Absolutely. I agree. However there are pressing problems at the moment and whomever you run to replace Landrieu will eventually let you down in one fashion or another. Do you toss up your hands on person X or even better, toss up your hands on the party?  What if person X doesn&#039;t get elected? What if the people chose Landrieu again? Whose fault is that? The party&#039;s or democracy?  
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;So please, get over the anger you have with people who point out these fifth columnists, the emperors without clothing. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Not quite what has been &quot;pointed out&quot; here. What Malkin is doing is trying to divorce conservatism from the republican party. The 2 together are stronger that both apart. Divorce conservatives from the GOP and the GOP will turn left to stay alive. That will drag the country left faster than any obamamessiah could and we will have done it to ourselves. (By indulging perpetual temper tantrums.) 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;There is nothing wrong with someone like Malkin pointing these things out…&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Nothing at all. Or Kos for that matter. I am just pointing out the ramifications of what is being advocated. (Over and over...during the primaries, the election, the defeat, the effort to stop the democrats from entrenching their power.... A hysterical hate vendetta in the name of conservatism that has the end result of enabling everything that conservatism is supposedly against.) But no, she has a right to say whatever she wants and a right to pull the plug on my commentary at any moment. I fully recognize that. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;NOW is the time to find people who will run against the collectivists in the primaries. &quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sure. 
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;And also while you’re at it, can you get over your Erich Fromm-ian need to control other people? It’s irritating.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Well firstly, Erich Fromm wasn&#039;t about &quot;controlling other people&quot; from what I have read but I have often thought of &quot;Escape from freedom&quot; when I read some of these posts. Secondly, who is trying to control whom here? I posted some contact information and got a lot of BS for it. If that intimidating to your beliefs perhaps you should reexamine what you want to believe. It might be a rationalization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 3rd, 2009 at 8:36 am, FilmLadd said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Bill, I have David Vitter and Bobby Jindal in my state.</p></blockquote>
<p>Jindal has been booted around as a RINO here. Not sure about vitter.</p>
<blockquote><p> The one I am trying to get out of representing LA is Mary Landrieu, a true eltist collectivist if every there was one.</p></blockquote>
<p>Best luck. </p>
<blockquote><p>And yes I have contacted Mitch McConnell and quite a few other representatives. I yell at them, send emails, letters, etc.</p></blockquote>
<p>Good. That&#8217;s a few of us. </p>
<blockquote><p>But yelling at some intern weinie on the phone doesn’t do much good. </p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a start. It is also what we are down to.<br />
My point was that things are going to get worse until &#8220;conservatives&#8221; get moving. You, Danceswithdachshunds and I are not going to be able to a whole lot but everyone calling, writing, etc will. It has before. The other side is organized to do it and where moveon.org is running ads the calls are about even. (At least in Maine) </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;. Certainly not as much as running someone AGAINST their boss. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Fantastic. Absolutely. I agree. However there are pressing problems at the moment and whomever you run to replace Landrieu will eventually let you down in one fashion or another. Do you toss up your hands on person X or even better, toss up your hands on the party?  What if person X doesn&#8217;t get elected? What if the people chose Landrieu again? Whose fault is that? The party&#8217;s or democracy?  </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So please, get over the anger you have with people who point out these fifth columnists, the emperors without clothing. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Not quite what has been &#8220;pointed out&#8221; here. What Malkin is doing is trying to divorce conservatism from the republican party. The 2 together are stronger that both apart. Divorce conservatives from the GOP and the GOP will turn left to stay alive. That will drag the country left faster than any obamamessiah could and we will have done it to ourselves. (By indulging perpetual temper tantrums.) </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is nothing wrong with someone like Malkin pointing these things out…&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Nothing at all. Or Kos for that matter. I am just pointing out the ramifications of what is being advocated. (Over and over&#8230;during the primaries, the election, the defeat, the effort to stop the democrats from entrenching their power&#8230;. A hysterical hate vendetta in the name of conservatism that has the end result of enabling everything that conservatism is supposedly against.) But no, she has a right to say whatever she wants and a right to pull the plug on my commentary at any moment. I fully recognize that. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;NOW is the time to find people who will run against the collectivists in the primaries. &#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And also while you’re at it, can you get over your Erich Fromm-ian need to control other people? It’s irritating.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Well firstly, Erich Fromm wasn&#8217;t about &#8220;controlling other people&#8221; from what I have read but I have often thought of &#8220;Escape from freedom&#8221; when I read some of these posts. Secondly, who is trying to control whom here? I posted some contact information and got a lot of BS for it. If that intimidating to your beliefs perhaps you should reexamine what you want to believe. It might be a rationalization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herself</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610705</link>
		<dc:creator>herself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610705</guid>
		<description>McConnell, you represent the Republican party that left me. I have not left the party as I knew it.

I figure at this point the Democrats are so efficient at screwing the nation maybe I need to vote for and support them to ensure the super-majority persists long enough to utterly destroy this nation so that the Democracy finally dies as history insists it must. Getting over the agony quicker does have its proponents. It hurts for a shorter time to peel off the bandages rapidly than slowly.

McConnell, tell me why I should not just give up on the country of my birth even though it has morphed to a huge nanny-government state at the hands of you idiot Republicans and the kings and queens of corruption, the Democrats?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McConnell, you represent the Republican party that left me. I have not left the party as I knew it.</p>
<p>I figure at this point the Democrats are so efficient at screwing the nation maybe I need to vote for and support them to ensure the super-majority persists long enough to utterly destroy this nation so that the Democracy finally dies as history insists it must. Getting over the agony quicker does have its proponents. It hurts for a shorter time to peel off the bandages rapidly than slowly.</p>
<p>McConnell, tell me why I should not just give up on the country of my birth even though it has morphed to a huge nanny-government state at the hands of you idiot Republicans and the kings and queens of corruption, the Democrats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; McConnell/Graham mortgage entitlement would cost at least $200 billion</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610446</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; McConnell/Graham mortgage entitlement would cost at least $200 billion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610446</guid>
		<description>[...] continue to bang the drum. Yesterday, I e-mailed Sen. McConnell&#8217;s office asking how much his disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement proposal would cost. How much would this amendment add to the price tag of the $1 trillion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] continue to bang the drum. Yesterday, I e-mailed Sen. McConnell&#8217;s office asking how much his disastrous GOP mortgage entitlement proposal would cost. How much would this amendment add to the price tag of the $1 trillion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican: It&#8217;s the New Black &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610186</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican: It&#8217;s the New Black &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610186</guid>
		<description>[...] think the fight against the crap sandwich the kids like to call the Fiscal Suicide Act of 2009 is a testament to that (as the amount of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] think the fight against the crap sandwich the kids like to call the Fiscal Suicide Act of 2009 is a testament to that (as the amount of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frontierguy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610174</link>
		<dc:creator>frontierguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610174</guid>
		<description>McConnell says his goal is not to kill the bill....Wrong, your goal is to rally the repubs to get out of this bill&#039;s way.  The democrats don&#039;t want to sign it without the republicans.  Let them do it moron!!  Make them take ownership of it.  American knows now, it is a bad bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McConnell says his goal is not to kill the bill&#8230;.Wrong, your goal is to rally the repubs to get out of this bill&#8217;s way.  The democrats don&#8217;t want to sign it without the republicans.  Let them do it moron!!  Make them take ownership of it.  American knows now, it is a bad bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FilmLadd</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610168</link>
		<dc:creator>FilmLadd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610168</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 2nd, 2009 at 5:37 pm, Bill Grant said:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bill, I have David Vitter and Bobby Jindal in my state. The one I am trying to get out of representing LA is Mary Landrieu, a true eltist collectivist if every there was one. And yes I have contacted Mitch McConnell and quite a few other representatives. I yell at them, send emails, letters, etc.

But yelling at some intern weinie on the phone doesn&#039;t do much good. Certainly not as much as running someone AGAINST their boss. That hits them where it hurts.

So please, get over the anger you have with people who point out these fifth columnists, the emperors without clothing. 

There is nothing wrong with someone like Malkin pointing these things out... unless you believe that all reportage must be self-censored to protect the Republic.

If our Republic needs lies, deception and the deafening silence of self-censorship to elect fifth columnist collectivists in order to survive, then maybe it deserves the dustbin of history.

NOW is the time to find people who will run against the collectivists in the primaries. Not next year or the following. Now.

And also while you&#039;re at it, can you get over your Erich Fromm-ian need to control other people? It&#039;s irritating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 2nd, 2009 at 5:37 pm, Bill Grant said:</p></blockquote>
<p>Bill, I have David Vitter and Bobby Jindal in my state. The one I am trying to get out of representing LA is Mary Landrieu, a true eltist collectivist if every there was one. And yes I have contacted Mitch McConnell and quite a few other representatives. I yell at them, send emails, letters, etc.</p>
<p>But yelling at some intern weinie on the phone doesn&#8217;t do much good. Certainly not as much as running someone AGAINST their boss. That hits them where it hurts.</p>
<p>So please, get over the anger you have with people who point out these fifth columnists, the emperors without clothing. </p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with someone like Malkin pointing these things out&#8230; unless you believe that all reportage must be self-censored to protect the Republic.</p>
<p>If our Republic needs lies, deception and the deafening silence of self-censorship to elect fifth columnist collectivists in order to survive, then maybe it deserves the dustbin of history.</p>
<p>NOW is the time to find people who will run against the collectivists in the primaries. Not next year or the following. Now.</p>
<p>And also while you&#8217;re at it, can you get over your Erich Fromm-ian need to control other people? It&#8217;s irritating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dadinseattle</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610122</link>
		<dc:creator>dadinseattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 06:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610122</guid>
		<description>The local news here had a call-in poll tonight.

Poll question: Would would vote for Obama&#039;s stimulus package if given the chance?

There is hope people(this is lib-land)!

&lt;strong&gt;80% said NO!&lt;/strong&gt;

Main reason given: full of pork, and not stimulus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The local news here had a call-in poll tonight.</p>
<p>Poll question: Would would vote for Obama&#8217;s stimulus package if given the chance?</p>
<p>There is hope people(this is lib-land)!</p>
<p><strong>80% said NO!</strong></p>
<p>Main reason given: full of pork, and not stimulus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moralia - What she said</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610090</link>
		<dc:creator>Moralia - What she said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610090</guid>
		<description>[...] So because I&#8217;d rather spend time with my kids than re-hash this incredibly simple concept for retarded readers, I&#8217;ll just refer you to Michelle Malkin: what she said. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So because I&#8217;d rather spend time with my kids than re-hash this incredibly simple concept for retarded readers, I&#8217;ll just refer you to Michelle Malkin: what she said. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LSmith</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610082</link>
		<dc:creator>LSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to know what the new definition of &quot;credit-worthy&quot; will be for people to qualify for these loans. I&#039;ve tried to refinance with three banks for a lower rate and not one has been interested unless I&#039;m at least 3 payments in default.

Also, thanks to foreclosures my house is worth about $30K less than what I owe and $100K less thn what I paid 1.5 yrs ago. No bank will refinance a house worth less than the loan itself, and there must be a lot of people in the same boat, incluing those who took out huge equity loans a few years ago. Will the government start performing special government-backed appraisals as well to ensure that more people can qualify? 

Who will benefit from these 4% loans unless &quot;credit-worthiness&quot; is redefined by the government, for government-backed loans, like &quot;only one foreclosure&quot; or &quot;only one bankruptcy&quot; qualifies as still having &quot;good credit&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know what the new definition of &#8220;credit-worthy&#8221; will be for people to qualify for these loans. I&#8217;ve tried to refinance with three banks for a lower rate and not one has been interested unless I&#8217;m at least 3 payments in default.</p>
<p>Also, thanks to foreclosures my house is worth about $30K less than what I owe and $100K less thn what I paid 1.5 yrs ago. No bank will refinance a house worth less than the loan itself, and there must be a lot of people in the same boat, incluing those who took out huge equity loans a few years ago. Will the government start performing special government-backed appraisals as well to ensure that more people can qualify? </p>
<p>Who will benefit from these 4% loans unless &#8220;credit-worthiness&#8221; is redefined by the government, for government-backed loans, like &#8220;only one foreclosure&#8221; or &#8220;only one bankruptcy&#8221; qualifies as still having &#8220;good credit&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Grant</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610065</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610065</guid>
		<description>On February 2nd, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Salt said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I wouldn’t include Thomas Sowell in your list of RINOs, certainly.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That makes you a closet RINO. A RINO sympathizer maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On February 2nd, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Salt said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I wouldn’t include Thomas Sowell in your list of RINOs, certainly.</p></blockquote>
<p>That makes you a closet RINO. A RINO sympathizer maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/02/sen-mcconnell-proposes-more-big-government-to-fix-big-government-debacle/comment-page-2/#comment-610057</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=22401#comment-610057</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On February 2nd, 2009 at 9:16 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

Read the comments. Townhall had a major purge of conservatives. If you think Medved, Hewitt, Lewis and the rest are anti-RINOs, I rest my case. 

...

If you disagree, fine. I see several commenters here who know what I’m talking about.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m sensing a little bit of hostility.  It was just a question.


&lt;blockquote&gt;
As to the columnists, they are NOT Townhall exclusive and get the vast majority of their audience elsewhere. I am referring to the blog area.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s all I wanted to know.  I typically go there for the handy links to the columnists.  I wouldn&#039;t include Thomas Sowell in your list of RINOs, certainly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On February 2nd, 2009 at 9:16 pm, Pasadena Phil said:</p>
<p>Read the comments. Townhall had a major purge of conservatives. If you think Medved, Hewitt, Lewis and the rest are anti-RINOs, I rest my case. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>If you disagree, fine. I see several commenters here who know what I’m talking about.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m sensing a little bit of hostility.  It was just a question.</p>
<blockquote><p>
As to the columnists, they are NOT Townhall exclusive and get the vast majority of their audience elsewhere. I am referring to the blog area.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s all I wanted to know.  I typically go there for the handy links to the columnists.  I wouldn&#8217;t include Thomas Sowell in your list of RINOs, certainly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
