Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House?

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 3, 2009 10:50 AM

Crikey. Three weeks in, and this administration is a complete laughingstock. More tax troubles. More nanny problems. More withdrawals. This time it’s Obama’s Chief Performance Officer.

Yeah: Chief Performance Officer.

Triple-snortworthy.

Nancy Killefer, who failed for a year and a half to pay employment taxes on household help, has withdrawn her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer for the federal government, the White House said Tuesday.

Killefer was the second major Obama administration nominee to withdraw and the third to have tax problems complicate their nomination after President Barack Obama announced their selection.

The White House said Obama had accepted Killefer’s decision and that the 55-year-old executive with consulting giant McKinsey & Co., would explain her reasons for pulling out later Tuesday.

When her selection was announced by Obama on Jan. 7, The Associated Press disclosed that in 2005 the District of Columbia government had filed a $946.69 tax lien on her home for failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help.

“[W]ould explain her reasons for pulling out.”

Let me guess: “Family reasons.”

***

How do we blame Bush for this?

And why did Geithner get a pass while Killefer gets thrown under the bus? Hmmm?

***

Killefer’s brilliant, impressive, uniquely qualified resume, just FYI:

Nancy Killefer is a senior director in the Washington, D.C. office of McKinsey & Company, Inc. She is a leader of McKinsey’s Public Sector Practice, specializing in developing strategies and improving organizational effectiveness for a range of government clients.

Nancy joined McKinsey in 1979 and during her career focused on strategy, marketing, and organizational effectiveness and efficiency issues with an emphasis on consumer-based and retail industries.

From 1997 to 2000, Nancy served as Assistant Secretary for Management, CFO, and COO at the United States Department of the Treasury. In addition to overall management responsibilities for Treasury’s 14 bureaus and 160,000 people, she led a major modernization at the Internal Revenue Service, prepared Treasury’s systems for Y2K, and reshaped management processes, including installing an asset management program across the Treasury Department.

After returning to McKinsey in 2000, she joined the IRS Oversight Board, a public-private entity akin to a corporate board that oversees the IRS. She served there from 2000 to 2005 and was its Chairperson from 2002 to 2004.

Nancy received her M.B.A. from the Sloan School of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. She holds a B.A. with honors in economics from Vassar College. Prior to business school, Nancy worked as an associate at Charles River Associates, a microeconomics consulting firm.

***

Allahpundit: Follow the timeline.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. You Can’t Spell Bi-Partisan without “B.S.” « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
  2. Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House? — But As For Me
  3. Hyscience
  4. Republicans Are Wrong On Tom Daschle (UPDATE) « The Forum
  5. Democrats Like To Raise Taxes, But Not Pay Them! « The Chronicles Of Two Rogue Jews
  6. UPDATE 03 FEB - www.whitehouse.gov Ethics Section Is A Laugh Obama! « Goodtimepolitics
  7. What is it with Democrats and Taxes? | Political Byline
  8. Finally! Tax Cheats Withdraw « Bob’s Bites
  9. Yet another Democrat tax cheat? | BitsBlog
  10. Finally! Tax Cheats(D) Withdraw « Bob’s Bites
  11. Not one buy TWO tax cheats go byebye from B. Hussein Obama’s cabinet. Tom Daschle tax cheat and also Nancy Killefer is the latest tax cheat to go goodnight now! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  12. Another One Bites The Dust « Beltway Snark
  13. Pikers! « In Other Words
  14. AllMilitary.com - Official Military Blog, Military Updates » Blog Archive » The Thursday Claw 2-5-09
  15. Jeremiah Films
  16. Political Greed; Just “more of the same” from the Obama Administration « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  17. Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House? « Top Daily Digest Reading
  18. Your Cheatin’ Heart(s) « Grand Rants

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #610299
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:52 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Judgement!

  2. #610301
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:53 am, thewariscoming said:

    Hey, another big shot McKinsey employee. The same firm that hired Chelsea Clinton at $100K right out of college. They’re the ‘Goldman Sachs’ of the consulting industry.

  3. #610305
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Finally I’m #1! I’m referencing Obama’s lack of judgement …something we could only get the republicans to mention (against him) during the campaign…

  4. #610307
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 am, DBNinKY said:

    How do we blame Bush for this?

    Give them time, they’ll think up some degree of linkage – I’m sure LGM is hard at work on it at this moment.

  5. #610309
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:56 am, chapoutier said:

    How do we blame Bush for this?

    Like 9/11, her failure to pay taxes happened on Bush’s watch. Was he too busy “clearing brush” on vacation in Crawford to personally examine every person’s tax returns before they filed?

  6. #610311
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:56 am, misterbee241 said:

    What is a government Chief Performance Officer? Bueller? Anyone?

  7. #610318
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:01 am, drivingjack said:

    And why did Geithner get a pass while Killefer gets thrown under the bus? Hmmm?

    Easy – the liberals are sexist. Seems simple enough?

  8. #610320
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:02 am, ErinF said:

    Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House?

    Sure they know how, but they reserve the right to be “free to choose” not to pay. They think their majority makes them above the law.

  9. #610321
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 am, The Master said:

    Great vetting job by Obama’s administration. You’d think the first question they’d ask is: have you ever committed tax fraud? Or do so few liberals actually pay their taxes that such a question would be too quaint? In any event, I think that before the Great Hopey-Changey World-Altering thing Obama has been promising, he should get his own roach-infested house in order.

  10. #610323
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:04 am, genso said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:56 am, misterbee241 said:

    What is a government Chief Performance Officer? Bueller? Anyone?

    Trying to make the government more efficient. She did this for the IRS. From the looks of that, though, it seems “efficient” is liberal code word for ignoring Dem tax cheats.

  11. #610324
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:07 am, iamsaved said:

    This is the real dawning of the “Culture of Corruption” and the Democrat’s “failed” policies. They forget, when you point your finger accusingly at someone, there are three pointing right back at you. They tried to hang those titles on Republicans but it looks like they now own them.

    On the Daschle tax problem – didn’t they just hang Senator Stevens from Alaska for accepting “free” remodeling and other perks while in office? I’m sure if they check back far enough, they’ll see that Tom Daschle received similar perks. These patterns don’t start over night and you don’t become a millionaire on a Representative/Senator’s salary.

  12. #610325
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 am, cpodug said:

    What’s the difference between The One’s appointees and Leona Helmsley? After she famously noted “Only little people pay taxes,” she went to jail for tax evasion.

  13. #610326
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 am, zyzzyg said:

    I suppose this is a good thing. The more Pres Obama appointees to pay taxes the less likely we will need the stimulus.

  14. #610327
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:08 am, MTConservative said:

    Nancy Pelosi was always fond of the phrase “culture of corruption”. I notice that she has stopped saying that. Yeesh! It should be obvious, even to the group that we laughingly call the mainstream media, that the Democrat party is full of crooks and cheats from top to bottom.

  15. #610330
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:11 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Now we know why the Obaminites HAD to have Holder as AG-they wanted to make sure no one would prosecute all these
    Democrats for tax evasion.

    Democrats do get a bye on a lot of criminal activity and discounts on Freezer Bags. Most Ethical Administration ever coupled with Trophy Wife Pelosi’s Most Ethical Congress.

  16. #610335
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:15 am, Truesoldier said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 am, The Master said:
    Great vetting job by Obama’s administration.

    It looks like Obama used the same vetting team from his campaign.

  17. #610336
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:16 am, rplatt said:

    Good lord . . . Obama must have hired an earth moving company to turn over this many rocks.

  18. #610337
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:18 am, Truesoldier said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:16 am, rplatt said:
    Good lord . . . Obama must have hired an earth moving company to turn over this many rocks.

    Not so, this one had a tax lien placed against her by DC so his vetting team should have found it long before he even nominated her.

  19. #610338
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:18 am, WestCoastCoconut said:

    What’s next? Nominees find that they hire illegals and they pay them cash at less than the minimum!!! or put the bribe money in the freezer!!!

    Oh they haven’t gone that far down the list yet I suppose.

  20. #610344
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am, Truesoldier said:

    This from FoxNews.com:

    When her selection was announced by Obama on Jan. 7, The Associated Press disclosed that in 2005 the District of Columbia government had filed a $946.69 tax lien on her home for failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help.

  21. #610345
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am, Sergeant Tim said:

    The delinquent Dems need timeouts to think of their misbehavior when it comes to paying taxes, not prosecuted. So, when Obama has vacated Guantanamo, he should send them for some quiet reflection in the sun.

    I’m sure they’ll all pick up a few ‘Club Gitmo’ T-shirts while they are there.

  22. #610347
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 am, alexwest said:

    OK. So when do we start talking about a flat tax?

  23. #610349
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:24 am, jsr said:

    This is starting to make me nostaligic for the Clinton years when time elapsed between scandals, gaffes, errors of judgement and various skeletons falling out of closets was measured in days, not hours.

  24. #610352
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:25 am, nuss said:

    And why did Geithner get a pass while Killefer gets thrown under the bus? Hmmm?

    Simple. Killefer had not yet been admitted to the brother-sisterhood of the Chosen Ones. She doesn’t qualify for protection.

  25. #610353
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I thought not paying taxes was a requirement in the Obama Administration.

  26. #610355
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:28 am, genso said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:26 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    I thought not paying taxes was a requirement in the Obama Administration.

    Can we call them unpatriotic now?

  27. #610356
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:28 am, FamilyMan said:

    Your columns are becoming redundant Michelle.
    I know it’s not your fault.

  28. #610357
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:29 am, happyscrapper said:

    Maybe the MSM should just report when Obama selects someone who ISN’T corrupt. I really don’t expect that most of his choices are going to be moral, upstanding citizens. The liberals will get away with whatever they can. They do not live by the same standards and most decent law-abiding people.

  29. #610359
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:29 am, William Teach said:

    I’d like to know what a Chief Performance Officer is, too. Does the position involve oiling up Barry’s glutes for bare chested media luv photoshoots? Or, is she involved in walking Barry’s dog and making sure the kids do their homework, so The One and his wife can attend fancy dinners?

  30. #610361
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:30 am, publiuswarmac9999 said:

    Probably the greatest argument for simplifying the tax system has been made accidentally by the obamanites. If people with their money can make such mistakes, then what chance does the average American have. The only way out of all this is a massive tax revolt where literally millions of Americans refuse to pay the income tax. If there are enough people doing this, then the tax system will have to change along with the government.

  31. #610364
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:36 am, jt3151 said:

    I am a CPA, and I can tell you that people are well aware of the nanny tax. They don’t know how it works, but they certainly know they have to do something. If you have a nanny, you have an accountant.This is just plain cheating.

  32. #610367
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:37 am, NavyMom said:

    Let me repeat what I said yesterday…I’m switching my political ties to the Democrat party. No need to pay any more taxes! Sweet!

  33. #610371
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:39 am, tonyr951 said:

    They just know how to TELL us to pay them

  34. #610372
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:39 am, palani said:

    Let’s not forget that Democrats are notorious in thinking that you (any “you”), just not them, should bear the brunt of the tax burden.

    In fairness, perhaps all this illustrates how a ridiculously complicated and obtuse tax code is in dire need of simplication and reform.

  35. #610375
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:40 am, DBNinKY said:

    “Nancy Killefer, who failed for a year and a half to pay employment taxes on household help, has withdrawn her candidacy… .”

    Two questions, somewhat sexist in nature but valid all the same –

    (1.) Why do so many Democrats, usually women, fail to pay taxes for household help?

    (2.) Presuming by “household help” they mean a nanny, why do so many Democrats, again usually women, find it necessary to have help in raising their children?

    Doesn’t this make it seem like Democrat women are incapable of taking care of their own children and maintaining a career, presuming they work? And what’s more, what’s with the need for paid live-in and/or in-home childcare? Is there not a nearby daycare or adoring grandmother or aunt willing to pitch-in and help?

  36. #610378
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:41 am, sbw999 said:

    Politicians are as a whole a rather stinky bunch. I don’t believe for a second that this is just a democrat problem. If you audited the tax returns of all Senators and Congressmen/women, I would bet you would find at least an 80% cheat rate. If you are looking for morality, honesty and character… but for a couple of rare exceptions, you won’t find it in Washington, period.

    And while we in the blogosphere all snipe at each other, gleeful in pointing out that the other side has once again f***ed up, this Country goes further and further down the drain.

  37. #610381
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:42 am, Excessive Moderate said:

    The Messiah’s in a fix and no mistake. He can choose from a huge pool of ethically-challenged Clintonites, or sift through the sewage of our beloved Congress, or comb through academia and the NGOs for wild-eyed devotees of the tin-foil hat. Even if he wanted qualified people of integrity, there are none to be had under his tent, and precious few across the aisle either.

  38. #610382
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:42 am, Laree said:

    Imus in the Morning guest Alan Colmes discusses Tom Daschle, and the other Obama nominees.

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/02/alan-colmes-tell-imus-americans-need.html

  39. #610389
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:49 am, James Felix said:

    If you audited the tax returns of all Senators and Congressmen/women, I would bet you would find at least an 80% cheat rate.

    Which is why, I think, federal office holders should be autited at least semi-annually during their service and for five years after leaving.

    And I have two questions of my own:
    1) what happened to that 62 page disclosure document all the Obama appointees were going to have to fill out?
    2) WTF is a “chief performance officer”?!!?!?!

  40. #610397
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:53 am, bradley said:

    Cute. ANOTHER high IRS official who ignores paying taxes. Makes you wonder why ANYONE should pay taxes, since the people that run the damned tax department can’t be bothered to pay them. This is unbelievable, coming from Mr. Perfect’s Hopeychangey BS administration. Wait. Maybe it’s not. Hopeychangey IS from Chicago, maybe it’s just “the Chicago Way”.

  41. #610398
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:54 am, Flyoverman said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:56 am, chapoutier said:
    How do we blame Bush for this?
    Like 9/11, her failure to pay taxes happened on Bush’s watch. Was he too busy “clearing brush” on vacation in Crawford to personally examine every person’s tax returns before they filed?

    He did not clear the brush. He burned it in order to enhance his carbon footprint and thus his legacy.

  42. #610399
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:55 am, Bob1234 said:

    What is a government Chief Performance Officer? Bueller? Anyone?

    I think it may be akin to “community organizer.”

  43. #610400
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:56 am, iamsaved said:

    1) what happened to that 62 page disclosure document all the Obama appointees were going to have to fill out?

    They were only looking for the answer to the question as to whether or not you or a family member ever owned any guns.

  44. #610403
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:57 am, TXGator said:

    From now on, just assume all Obama appointees are corrupt in some way. After all, Teh ONE wouldn’t be where he is today if he didn’t sell out to the deep pockets. There’s not a righteous one in the bunch.
    Self-righteous? That’s another story.

  45. #610404
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:57 am, happyscrapper said:

    Just look at that woman’s picture. I know this will sound really mean, but I was wondering if there are ANY liberal women who are the least bit attractive? There seems to be a certain “harshness” in their faces. If any of the trolls can find one for me, I would appreciate it. I’m NOT talking about Hollywood liberals with their botox, implants, and professional make-up, etc.

  46. #610406
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:58 am, MarcoPolo said:

    No wonder the country is bankrupt. Even wealthy Democrats do not pay taxes!

  47. #610408
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:59 am, PhredE said:

    “Which is why, I think, federal office holders should be autited at least semi-annually during their service and for five years after leaving.”

    Maybe a year or two at the beginning of the time frame as well? A lot of government employees that undergo background checks have their finances and business dealings scrutinized with at least as much, if not more detail.

    “2) WTF is a “chief performance officer”?!!?!?!”

    It’s a new position conjured up by Obama and his handlers to, supposedly, “increase governmental efficiency” and the like… as if it weren’t some really bad joke based on an oxymoron.

    Does anyone have any specific information about the domestic worker in question? Since this person was working ‘under the table’ (or something similar), is this person a citizen, legal resident or, [sigh...] an illegal alien?

  48. #610409
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:59 am, iamsaved said:

    (1.) Why do so many Democrats, usually women, fail to pay taxes for household help?

    (2.) Presuming by “household help” they mean a nanny, why do so many Democrats, again usually women, find it necessary to have help in raising their children?

    That’s because the libs are waiting for this stimulus bill to include free child care until the age of 18. Why pay for it when our tax dollars will?

  49. #610410
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:00 pm, James Felix said:

    Just look at that woman’s picture. I know this will sound really mean, but I was wondering if there are ANY liberal women who are the least bit attractive?

    In politics? None I know of. But TV and the movies are full of’em.

  50. #610412
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:02 pm, iamsaved said:

    Remember, Obama campaigned on the re-distribution of wealth where those who paid no taxes will get a check in the mail too. I’m beginning to think he had Democrat’s in mind – doesn’t appear they pay any taxes.

  51. #610418
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm, sbw999 said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 11:49 am, James Felix said:
    If you audited the tax returns of all Senators and Congressmen/women, I would bet you would find at least an 80% cheat rate.
    Which is why, I think, federal office holders should be autited at least semi-annually during their service and for five years after leaving.

    A great idea!!

    Here is another one. Two term limits for ALL Senators, and Congressmen, both on a State and Federal level. There is way too much power in these “lifetime” politicians, and it breeds breathtaking arrogance. Arrogance often leads to this type of dishonest behavior, thinking you will never be caught or that you have the right to flout the laws the rest of us “pee-ons” have to follow.

  52. #610420
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:08 pm, b-cat said:

    So liberals don’t give to charity, and they don’t pay for their government mandated social welfare programs either. Figures.

    And they claim the GOP is the party of greed. Looks like they grab all they can and can all they get to me.

  53. #610421
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:09 pm, cicerokid said:

    i just googled “attractive liberal women” happyscrap, and came up empty!

  54. #610422
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:10 pm, cicerokid said:

    made myself look at another pic of janet reno. “shivvver”

  55. #610430
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:18 pm, iamsaved said:

    So liberals don’t give to charity, and they don’t pay for their government mandated social welfare programs either. Figures.

    Let’s be fair now. I just heard that the liberals in Congress have to attend a mandatory class taught by Joe Biden.
    Charitable Giving and Paying Taxes – Doing your patriotic duty! :lol:

  56. #610438
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, MrOlympia said:

    Corruption, lying, stealing, cheating and what do you hear from our liberal media but excuses for their fellow liberal partners in crime.

    Can you imagine if this was a Republican administration even nominating idiots like O has? No way in h*ll Democrats would approve Republicans with these problems. They would be overtly nasty and angry and treat the nominee with utter disdain.

    However, our side pretty much rubber stamps O’s crooks……

  57. #610444
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, Wade said:

    Chief Performance Officer. Monica was down for that job.

  58. #610445
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:29 pm, walterc said:

    Never in my wildest dreams did I ever guess that Hillary would be the ethical standard for cabinet nominees to aspire to.

  59. #610451
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:32 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    And why did Geithner get a pass while Killefer gets thrown under the bus? Hmmm?

    Killefer doesn’t have a copy of the Emmanuel – Blago video.

  60. #610455
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Like 9/11, her failure to pay taxes happened on Bush’s watch. Was he too busy “clearing brush” on vacation in Crawford to personally examine every person’s tax returns before they filed?

    I believe it was Cheney and Halliburton who failed to file her taxes.

  61. #610458
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:34 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Is this what Obie meant by “change in government”

    Each day Obie reveals to us what a clueless and inexperienced shill he is for the leftist platform.

    Clearly he doesn’t share the same view on patriotism as BroJoe.

    … so much for transparency, huh? Still looking out through that one-way glass window in the Oval Office… the one you tried to walk thru…

  62. #610459
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:35 pm, John Deaux said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 10:55 am, DBNinKY said:

    How do we blame Bush for this?

    Give them time, they’ll think up some degree of linkage – I’m sure LGM is hard at work on it at this moment.

    It’s kind of like 8 steps to Kevin Bacon, but for nutjobs.

    BTW, I’d like to announce my candidacy for the position of Chief Synergy Officer. My taxes are all paid up and for a modest $200k/year, I’ll make sure our synergy is effectively leveraged where possible.

  63. #610469
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Still looking out through that one-way glass window in the Oval Office… the one you tried to walk thru…

    Which reminds me – why hasn’t this been shown a hundred times on Letterman to show how stupid Obama is? You know, like Bush trying to open a locked door in China. At least it was a door…
    Oh yeah, Letterman is a stooge for the Dems. And boring.

  64. #610473
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:43 pm, By Choice said:

    The only difference between the cheating Repubs and demoncrats is the repubs quit and the demons get approved. Hate to say it but SanFranNan is right about the “culture of corruption” but it is ingrained in the entire DC system.

    Thanks to the MSM’s last two years of spouting about the failing economy–which it wasn’t–thanks to the election and the fears of what tricks Obama had up his sleeve when he was elected–stimulous package–thanks to the continued doom and gloom from the Obama admin–which isn’t really bad yet but is guaranteed to make it to Carter levels–the construction industry, upon which our business relies, has backed off considerably. You remember that “hockey stick” graph of Algores? Our income graph looks just like that only unside down.

    So NOW, I’m going to have to become a demoncrat and run for office because I can’t afford to pay my taxes this year.
    Thank God they can lein my property so that when they foreclose on my house the lein will be forgiven–or paid by the government because I’m about to become an “eligible”.

  65. #610474
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:43 pm, chapoutier said:

    Which reminds me – why hasn’t this been shown a hundred times on Letterman to show how stupid Obama is? You know, like Bush trying to open a locked door in China. At least it was a door…

    I’ve told you, he wasn’t confused. He was admiring his reflection.

  66. #610480
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:46 pm, JHSII said:

    I want the job of Director of the National Blame Avoidance Agency. No matter what happens, They can’t blame me. It’s not in the job title.

    I’m thinking that the job is worth at least a couple of million a year. And don’t worry about the taxes – I certainly won’t.

  67. #610482
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I just heard Mark Steyn mention that this woman has two nannies! TWO nannies! And her two “children” are teenagers. What exactly is she doing with two nannies? She has a perfect right to have them, but good grief!

  68. #610490
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, Andy said:

    HALLE:UJAH Daschle withdraws. That is a blessing since he’s big on Hillary-Care

  69. #610491
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I’ve told you, he wasn’t confused. He was admiring his reflection.

    Well if they’d turn the thermostat down, he wouldn’t have to work with his shirt off and his pecs glistening on the Rose buds in the garden.

  70. #610497
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:52 pm, WoodyP said:

    There has to be a whole lot more about this Chief Performance Officer that is yet to come to light. Missing he nanny unemployment insurance payment to DC is a whole lot more understandable (and way less money) than Geithner and Daschles evasion.

    If this is really all there is President BO has a HUGE double standard.

  71. #610503
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:54 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    If I had received a Tax Stimulas Rebate check, IF, I would send it to Team Obama to help with their back taxes.

    I just found out Senator Daschle STILL has a Senate paid staff from his days as Majority Leader-a life time perk. Rather like Imperial Russia or England with their Hereditary Nobels. And these people talk of corporate greed. His speaking fees were more than three million dollars last year and $83K per month in consulting fees.

    I am surprised he couldn’t afford a CPA.
    Chief Performance Officer? :evil: thoughts again. ;)

    Monica, paging Monica.

    ================
    Dashel has withdrawn–damn and here I was on a roll.

  72. #610504
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:55 pm, Andy said:

    HALLE:UJAH

    HALLELUJAH

    Watching CNN and talking head asks if Geitner might have passed if his story came out later and consensus was that Geitner got lucky.

    So another blow to the ONE and “saved by the bell” for the BO RINOs — they didn’t have to vote on this. They’re still need taking down for posing as wise men.

  73. #610524
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:03 pm, rainbow said:

    Change we can believe in alright. Let’s round up all the Dem tax cheats, then there would be no need for the stimulus! I agree with one of the statements above. Let’s all become democrats so we don’t have to pay taxes.

  74. #610526
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:05 pm, OneofThem said:

    You’d think that people who seem to be so gung-ho about getting people to fork over their money to the government would be a bit more willing to give some money themselves. :P

  75. #610555
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:17 pm, Ron said:

    Let’s hear it for the Obama vetting process! Whohooo! You just tell me one more time how Sarah Palin wasn’t properly vetted by McCain & Co., okay? Richardson; pay for play and out. Gaithner: tax evasion with an opps, pardon me; confirmed. Daschle: big time tax evasion and obfuscation; apology and withdrawn. Killifer: tax-dodging; withdrawn.

  76. #610584
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:28 pm, txvet2 said:

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:43 pm,

    chapoutier said:

    Which reminds me – why hasn’t this been shown a hundred times on Letterman to show how stupid Obama is? You know, like Bush trying to open a locked door in China. At least it was a door…

    I’ve told you, he wasn’t confused. He was admiring his reflection.

    Now that isn’t a joke.

  77. #610589
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:30 pm, txvet2 said:

    Rather like Imperial Russia or England with their Hereditary Nobels.

    Yeah, they really take the lifetime prize.

  78. #610591
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:30 pm, PhredE said:

    “Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House?”

    Short answer: Apparently not.
    Just another typical day in the corrupt hellhole known as Washington DC.

  79. #610600
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, Blaise said:

    Does anyone know how to pay taxes in the Obama White House?
    Of course they know how to pay their taxes, but why would they want to? Have you seen where it’s being spent? STD classes, bank bailouts, car company bailouts…why would they want their hard “earned” (being charitable) money to be sunk into black holes like these? It’s okay for the little people like us to pay to support this stuff…but our betters? Don’t be ridiculous!

  80. #610604
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, rambler said:

    How about the congressional tax cheats pay up in full, with penalties as well as interest, before the rest of us and future generations are in debt up to our eyeballs. Congress has no idea what ethics or budgets are.

  81. #610625
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 1:50 pm, tpitman said:

    It’s a new position conjured up by Obama and his handlers to, supposedly, “increase governmental efficiency” and the like… as if it weren’t some really bad joke based on an oxymoron.

    Does anyone have any specific information about the domestic worker in question? Since this person was working ‘under the table’ (or something similar), is this person a citizen, legal resident or, [sigh...] an illegal alien?

    On February 3rd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, Wade said:

    Chief Performance Officer. Monica was down for that job.

    You’re right, Wade. I seem to recall that Monica was “working” under the table.

  82. #610650
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:06 pm, Send_Me said:

    I wonder if TurboTax gives a group-rate discount. Perhaps they should include this in the next massive spending bill.

  83. #610683
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:37 pm, TXRose said:

    BO doesn’t know what the hell he is doing!!!! Where’s
    all the hopey change?

  84. #610687
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:39 pm, rightisright said:

    the flat tax doesn’t get rid of the IRS, the Fair Tax does…and of course it’s appropriately named.

  85. #610692
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:42 pm, vsatt said:

    I’m changing my voter registration.. I’ll never have to pay taxes again. And if I get caught I’ll at least be making enough to pay it with no problem.

  86. #610706
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:54 pm, greenfairie said:

    The IRS can go after regular folks who might have made a mistake while running a business with a merciless ruthlessness that would shock the Russian mob, but if you’re a Democratic appointee all you have to do is pay late and say you’re sorry. I keep telling my mom her native country in Latin America is officially less corrupt than ours.

  87. #610710
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 pm, in_awe said:

    drivingjack said:

    And why did Geithner get a pass while Killefer gets thrown under the bus? Hmmm?

    Easy – the liberals are sexist. Seems simple enough?

    I’m wondering why this fact wasn’t recounted last week when Obama signed that “pay equality” executive order. Does anyone else recall that he not only paid his Senate office staff less than McCain did, but he paid his female staffers less than he paid males in exactly the same roles?

  88. #610953
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 6:27 pm, drfredc said:

    Fine print here is not paying taxes on domestic “help” is that, without the taxes paid, the “help” doesn’t report the income or pay taxes. In our upside down tax world, this means the “help” may not be elegible to any Earned Income Tax Credit payback. The EITC basically pays them back for their payroll, Medicare and Social Security taxes.

    So not paying the household help probably saves everyone money by cutting out all the BS tax/welfare bureacracies and their related expenditures. So everyone’s performance is increased by not paying your help… She should be the perfect person for this position…

    Just trying to help these folks out with their Obamaneese rationalization’s… Apparently, they haven’t quite got their scam all sorted out just yet…

  89. #611055
    On February 3rd, 2009 at 8:13 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    I don’t have time to read this, but I did want to say that I admire Killefer for refusing to stretch and spackle her mug the way Nancy Pelosi does.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Emetic of the day

November 19, 2009 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

“You guys make a pretty good photo op.”

How do you say “You lie!” in Mandarin?

November 18, 2009 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

85 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

Obama’s double-talk on dissent.

Cartoon of the day

November 16, 2009 10:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

58 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Rear-ended.

President O-bow-ma

November 14, 2009 09:34 PM by Michelle Malkin

184 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Downward dog.

The fall of the Berlin Wall

November 9, 2009 10:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

All the president’s hacks

November 5, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments | 1 Trackback

Mmm, mmm, mmm

November 4, 2009 09:00 AM by Michelle Malkin

71 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: Barack Obama, Tim Geithner



Mudville Gazette

» The five-year plan
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook