Crikey: Labor Secy nominee Solis’s husband finally pays up 16-year-old tax liens; Update: Senate session postponed

This administration has no shame.
No shame at all.
USA Today reports that the Obama White House sheepishly disclosed today that Labor Secretary nominee Hilda Solis’s hubby has just paid up 16-year-old tax liens…yesterday. The disclosure comes just hours before the nomination vote. Hope, Change, Transparency!
The husband of President Obama’s Labor secretary nominee paid about $6,400 Wednesday to settle tax liens that had been outstanding for as long as 16 years against his business, the Obama administration told USA TODAY this afternoon.
The disclosure came shortly before a 2 p.m. meeting of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which is scheduled to vote on Rep. Hilda Solis’ nomination as labor secretary.
Los Angeles County records showed 15 outstanding state and county tax liens against Sam Sayyad and his auto repair business, totaling $7,630. Two other liens worth $981 were released in 1999 after Sayyad repaid the taxes owed, according to county records.
Solis’ financial disclosures list Sayyad’s business, Sam’s Foreign and Domestic Auto Center, as one of the couple’s main assets, worth between $50,000 and $100,000. The disclosure form Solis filed after her nomination also lists bank accounts containing between $250,000 and $500,000.
Solis and Sayyad were unaware of the liens until USA TODAY asked about them Tuesday, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said. He said Sayyad paid about $6,400 to Los Angeles County on Wednesday to settle the liens, but he plans to appeal.
Now, compare the treatment Solis and her hubby will get for his 15 outstanding liens compared to how Joe Wurzelbacher’s one lien was splashed all over the front pages and nightly news.
***
Update: Senate session postponed (hat tip: Instapundit)…
“Today’s executive session was postponed to allow members additional time to review the documentation submitted in support of Representative Solis’s nomination to serve in the important position of Labor Secretary,” read a joint statement issued by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), the panel’s chairman, and Mike Enzi (Wyoming), the committee’s ranking Republican. “There are no holds on her nomination and members on both sides of the aisle remain committed to giving her nomination the fair and thorough consideration that she deserves. We will continue to work together to move this nomination forward as soon as possible.”
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Adventures in liberal tolerance, part 999,901
September 29, 2011 02:39 PM by Michelle Malkin
48 CommentsThe death threats that don’t make the nightly news
February 2, 2011 11:39 AM by Michelle Malkin
66 CommentsOhio state snooper who targeted Joe the Plumber gets new government job
January 27, 2011 11:27 AM by Michelle Malkin
38 CommentsThe Philadelphia Horror: How mass murder gets a pass
January 21, 2011 12:00 AM by Michelle Malkin
131 CommentsLib radio talker attacks GOP Lt. Gov. of WI: She “performed fellatio on all the talk show hosts in Milwaukee” and “pulled a train”
January 20, 2011 12:10 PM by Michelle Malkin
165 CommentsCivility Watch: Nazis and crosshairs and killers, oh my; Update: Democrat Rep. Cohen doubles down on Nazi/KKK smears
January 19, 2011 03:35 PM by Michelle Malkin
89 CommentsIdiocracy: Conservatives who say “job-killing” are spreading hate
January 10, 2011 04:09 PM by Michelle Malkin
59 Comments
Categories: Double standards,Joe The Plumber
Patterico
» Sockpuppet Friday (a la carte edition)



JustOneMinute
» Send Better BS
Hot Air
» Rumor of the day: New North Korean leader assassinated in Beijing; Update: Untrue, says U.S.
AmSpecBlog
» The Burke-Hayek Double Play Combo
Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's compromise is not a victory for religious liberty [updated]










Sorry Chap…would not be happening for very long at all.
The State has the power to come in and nuke the business using various regulations, or going after their business license.
I am fairly confident the State would have issued their decree to the company about paying up, with penalties and interest by X date, or the State would rain on their parade.
…even if it were an honest mistake.
Uh…16 years later? That’s not trying to own up to it. That’s ignoring it.
And if you read the article, he claimed he was going to appeal it. This tells me he had not even bothered to address it in any way if he had not even appealed it yet.
Come on Chap, they flat out ignored it.
Really? So if, oh…I don’t know…Michelle Malkin LLC, for example, were not in good standing with the State of Maryland, which would indicate a failure on that company’s part to file necessary forms and payments to the state, you would consider that a deliberate act by that company’s owners to flaunt the law and its obligations?
No…and I figured you were setting something up with your original question.
My point was in response to that question…that the State has the power to compel a business to comply with whatever fairly quickly, and not allow it to drag on for 16 years.
Sure the state has the power to come in and demand compliance. It does not mean it exercises that power.
I know for a fact that tax liens can linger for years without the owner being aware, and states do not comsistently report liens, nor do they follow up on them.
It seems they did in this case though…what? at least 15 times?
There is a difference between filing a lien and pursuing a lien.
Yes, but it sure is awful convenient that these crap weasels don’t actually do anything to resolve the issue until they, or someone they are married to, gets nominated for a cabinet position.
And don’t give me that “I didn’t know I owed $_____” stuff. Because, like Chappie, most of them are lawyers and are probably lying.
You are not a very quick read, are you?
I am not talking about “they.” I in fact think Geithner was flat out lying, Daschle probably knew better too. I am talking about this specific situation, where I have little trouble believing that the tax liens were unknown and/or forgotten.
And the guy isn’t a lawyer, you may have read he runs an auto repair shop. I’m not sure where that falls on your imaginary credibility chart.
Auto repairman: Yea I looked at your car lady and you have some serious problems . It’s a good thing you brough it in when you did. You and you kids could have been killed.
Lady: Really? Oh, my God!
Auto repairman: Yea, see, the part don’t cost much but we’ll have to pull the engine to get to it. At that time we’ll know how much damage was done. But you’re looking at about $1000 dollars to start.
Lady: Oh, my! I wish my husband were here.
Auto repairman: Oh, is he an expert on cars? Listen, suit yourself, but I wouldn’t drive that car another foot if it were mine.
Lady: OK, I guess I’d better get it fixed now.
Auto repairman: That’s what I’d do lady. And perhaps we can work out some “payment” plan.
That give you an idea about my imaginary credibility chart, Chappo?
Nope, just a stupid working stiff. Not as edjewmacated as youse.
Well, fortunately you have all that ethics and truthiness and such going for you. So hopefully people are able to look past your other shortcomings.
Funny, I feel a sharp pain in between my shoulderblades.