Ensign/McConnell mortgage entitlement fails, 35-62; Update: Roll call vote added

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 5, 2009 06:16 PM

Scroll for update…roll call vote added…

The good news: The Ensign/McConnell $fill-in-the-blank-billion/trillion mortgage entitlement just failed.

The roll call vote was 35-62. Among the sane Republicans who voted NO: DeMint, Snowe, and Voinovich.
Plus: Sens. Bunning and Snowe.

All the rest foolishly cast their vote in favor of a massive Big Government “cure.”

The incurable urge of the Senate GOP leadership to be “for something” — no matter how fiscally irresponsible and ineffective — will come back to bite them in the backside.

It gave Chuck Schumer the golden opportunity on the Senate floor this afternoon to sanctimoniously deride the expansive plan as a spending boondoggle — echoing taxpayer groups who rightly called out this dumb idea from the start.

Schumer noted that the Obama Treasury Department is considering a similar plan. Now, what will the Republicans who supported the idea of low-interest, government-guaranteed mortgages to artificially prop up the housing market do when asked to show their bipartisanship and go along with whatever Obama/Geithner hatch? Suddenly awake to the bad consequences and oppose it on fiscal conservative grounds?

Blundermania.

***

Update: Here’s the roll call vote

Posted in: fiscal stimulus

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Obama, Dems Go To a Spa After Tough First Weeks But No Stimulus « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  2. Ensign/McConnell mortgage entitlement fails, 35-62 — But As For Me
  3. There's My Two Cents
  4. Stimulus bill or Spending Bill? You Decide! « Goodtimepolitics
  5. Ensign/McConnell mortgage entitlement fails, 35-62; Update: Roll call vote added — But As For Me
  6. Ensign/McConnell mortgage entitlement fails, 35-62; Update: Roll call vote added — But As For Me
  7. Michelle Malkin » What are they up to now?

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #613119
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:23 pm, verogolfer said:

    Now if the Senate will just not come up with something even worse.

  2. #613122
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:25 pm, Hangfire said:

    The Senate should just take a long vacation already.

  3. #613141
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:37 pm, goatsbarnyard said:

    Michelle these last two amendment votes have 97 votes. I know one missing is Minnesota’s who are the other two? Kennedy and?

  4. #613142
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:37 pm, Leatherneck said:

    I am glad to read this. Maybe, all within our government has not sold out to special interest like I thought.

  5. #613150
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:42 pm, txvet2 said:

    It is barely possible that some of the Republicans voted for this to give themselves some plausible deniability when they vote against the whole bill. I reiterate, barely possible….

  6. #613163
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:56 pm, Southpaw said:

    This is just anecdotal, but home prices in Socal may be approaching stabilization. How so? Prices are almost affordable. Any help from Washington may be too late and unnecessary.

    Don’t those people in Washington do any real-time tracking of news on the ground or are they just a bunch of foolish reactionaries? They focus on unemployment numbers, which may be a lagging trend, and fail to look for signs of economic thawing.

    Same goes with the stimulus bill. Scrap that piece of garbage and focus on prying loans from the grubby hands of bailed out banks and burning all of the toxic paper they created.

  7. #613186
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, torabora said:

    Oh, but wait just a dag gum minute here…

    Look how BIPARTISAN this bill was….

    DemocRATs voted THEIR way and Republicans voted mostly THEIR way. Yup, that’s the spirit!!!!

  8. #613197
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, tarpon said:

    Pretzels are looking positively straight these days.

    Hey I got some good news and some bad news. First the bad, the credit card company cut us off. Now the good, just got a new pre-qualified card in the mail — happy times are here again — Yippeeee

    kill porkulus, everyone knows you can’t spend your way to prosperity.

  9. #613218
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:47 pm, usa_usa said:

    McConnell (R-Loser)

  10. #613237
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:05 pm, Freddy said:

    Looks like this was just brought up so that some can claim they were for saving houses when asked why they voted against the final bill.

    Political posturing and nothing more.

    Like hearing from harry reid how important it is to ’slam this bill in as fast as possible’. Everyone knows at best, it will take years for it to do anything. There will be no difference in it’s effect to the economy if it passes this month or next. The only real difference will be that the people will actually get to read and hear more about what is in it.

    Now as we already know, the members of the senate, and those in the house, will claim that they never actually read the details later due to the urgency of it all!

  11. #613245
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:13 pm, thirteen28 said:

    Among the sane Republicans who voted NO: DeMint, Snowe, Warner, and Voinovich.

    Wow.

    Those are words you don’t see used together very often.

    Did Voinovich cry before the vote or after?

  12. #613247
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:14 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    My son was great…. he said to me…” Dad, when I get back from Iraq….. can we start a revolution?” I simply told him, with enough brave men and women, it won’t be a problem….. Now,my question is, from what I’ve seen, who has the courage?

  13. #613253
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, bjc said:

    *McConnell has no cred; He voted for the original sin bailout and should have been replaced as minority leader to get the GOP back on a successful path, but alas, they never seem to learn.
    *The insanity of a proposal like this coming from the supposed leader for the Republicans in the Senate shows once again that he desperately needs to brush up on the constitution to see that nowhere in the document does it allow for such action by the government; Get with it McConnell or go home!

  14. #613254
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, Boomer said:

    Finally, a small glimmer of hope! Another really bad idea dies a horrible death. Now to throw the entire stack of bad ideas in the recycle bin and start over. Somehow I believe the sun will still come up in the morning despite the growing stories of great peril and economic Armageddon “dear leader” is trying to stampede the herd with.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  15. #613258
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:25 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    My son was great…. he said to me…” Dad, when I get back from Iraq….. can we start a revolution?” I simply told him, with enough brave men and women, it won’t be a problem….. Now,my question is, from what I’ve seen, who has the courage?

    I know lots of people. We’re just desperately waiting for a leader.

  16. #613259
    On February 5th, 2009 at 8:26 pm, sicsempertyrannis said:

    Mark Warner is a Democrat BTW. He has more sense than Voinovich, Snowe, or Spector; but that’s not saying much.

  17. #613330
    On February 5th, 2009 at 9:34 pm, torabora said:

    Sounds pretty bipartisan to me.

    Our losers voted their own way and their losers voted their own way.

    Yep that worked well.

  18. #613333
    On February 5th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, FilmLadd said:

    The incurable urge of the Senate GOP leadership to be “for something” — no matter how fiscally irresponsible and ineffective — will come back to bite them in the backside.

    They should be for fighting fire with fire. They should be for outdoing them with class warfare. Give a one-year exemption for people earning less than $40k from any withholding taxes!

    Don’t democrats care about the working poor? Don’t they care? Let these poor noble people go home with more money – NOW!

    They deserve that money! They worked hard for it! Let our people go!

  19. #613341
    On February 5th, 2009 at 9:57 pm, TooMuchTime said:

    I’m thinking that some in the government are starting to understand that endebting your unborn great-grandchildren to the tune of trillions of dollars is not a good idea.

    Does anyone know how much is a tillion? It takes about six seconds to count each number up to a trillion (there are more syllables as you get closer to a trillion). That is 6 trillion seconds. In years that is 190,259. Think about that! Or don’t, if it scares you.

    Here are some interesting facts on just a billion.

    – A billion seconds ago it was 1959.

    – A billion minutes ago Jesus was alive.

    – A billion hours ago our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.

    – A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate Washington spends it.

    This is why we can’t have socialism. You cannot spend your way out of debt!

  20. #613400
    On February 5th, 2009 at 11:09 pm, kyconservative said:

    Good going Bunning. Genuine conservative to the core.

  21. #613431
    On February 6th, 2009 at 12:32 am, Flyoverman said:

    I am still stupified they even proposed this …..things. What were they thiking?

  22. #613432
    On February 6th, 2009 at 12:33 am, Flyoverman said:

    Sorry my 20 hour day has hosed my typing.l

  23. #613487
    On February 6th, 2009 at 6:39 am, conservativesRus said:

    This is soooooo good. I was out skiing today so sitting in the chairlift, I asked several people who thought this mortgage thing was a good idea the following question:
    Could they then tell me why if I wanted to buy an airplane or yacht that I shouldn’t get the same incentive? What is “magic” about housing?
    Is housing somehow more stimulative? If I then later couldn’t pay for my airplane or yacht, should the government then step in and demand that anybody who loaned me money offer me different terms than when I originally signed?
    Think I changed a couple of minds when they thought about it.

  24. #613488
    On February 6th, 2009 at 6:39 am, conservativesRus said:

    sorry in #23 – “today” meant Thursday

  25. #613489
    On February 6th, 2009 at 6:43 am, conservativesRus said:

    On February 5th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, FilmLadd said:
    They should be for fighting fire with fire. They should be for outdoing them with class warfare. Give a one-year exemption for people earning less than $40k from any withholding taxes!

    Film – I’m sorry to disagree here. If reducing taxes to a few is good – why not everybody who’s job is at risk. I say – zero federal income tax for everybody that does not work for the federal government.
    (I’m picking up on your idea of class warfare though – the government class vs. the working class)

  26. #613513
    On February 6th, 2009 at 8:35 am, MrVIBEMAN said:

    While I’m sure DeMint voted ‘No’ because he believes that the Bailout is unnecessary in any form, the only reason Snowe and Voinovich voted ‘No’ is because they are in bed with the Democrats.
    However the Democrats vote, so votes Snowe and Voinovich. Sadly, I believe this is true more often than not…

    It makes me wonder sometimes if maybe the Dems don’t have some kind of blackmail hold over them….

  27. #613837
    On February 6th, 2009 at 11:47 am, 24Klady said:

    Crapweasles Cornyn and Hutchison were were in the “yea” column. Golly gee whizz, no wonder Sarah Palin endorsed Gov. Perry. Yuuukkkk!

  28. #614002
    On February 6th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:37 pm, goatsbarnyard said: Michelle these last two amendment votes have 97 votes. I know one missing is Minnesota’s who are the other two? Kennedy and?

    Could it be Judd Gregg?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Map

November 16, 2009 07:15 PM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

The Stimulus Jobs Inflation Index

October 30, 2009 10:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Stimulus efficiency success story of the day

October 28, 2009 11:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

22 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Wealth redistribution watch: Cash for carts

October 19, 2009 02:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

28 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Put this on an Olympic scorecard: 9.8

October 2, 2009 09:57 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

The National Endowment for Obama

September 22, 2009 03:48 PM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 2 Trackbacks


Categories: fiscal stimulus



Mudville Gazette

» When the wind won't blow

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part Two)

Mudville Gazette

» Bad Weather (Part I)

Legal Insurrection

» Hacked E-mails or Else!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook