See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, frostrt said:

   A product of “questionable value and exorbitant expense” . . . what does that remind me of . . .

   Sarc/

2. #2
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, chapoutier said:

   I CANNOT BELIEVE THEY STOLE MY JOKE!!

3. #3
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, MtsEdge said:

   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, chapoutier said:

   Don’t you mean they stole your suggestion?

4. #4
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, cpodug said:

   O/T – wonder if anybody has ever ordered a Snuggie blanket, and got Snuggies diapers? Congree, maybe?

5. #5
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, cpodug said:

   congree- congress – sheesh!

6. #6
   On February 5th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

   Can we all get together and send our whipy leaders a pack of diapers? They are actting like babies and not leaders. Just because they want all this spending does not mean we the people do. If companies and banks fail, so what. There will be another to take there place who uses a common sense when running it,s business.
   CAPITALISM NOT SOCIALISM.

7. #7
   On February 5th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, Defector01 said:

   Sorry but Allah and Ed had you beat with the F-22 stimulus

8. #8
   On February 5th, 2009 at 5:41 pm, Joy said:

   Hey Chap – Does it occur to you that if you thought of it, maybe someone else did too?

   Besides, you’re in grave danger; you’re sounding like and TYPING LIKE DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL!!!

9. #9
   On February 5th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, Joy said:

   Both of those were hilarious! Mary Katherine is a hoot!

10. #10
    On February 5th, 2009 at 5:57 pm, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Secretly, everyone wants the Snuggie, though.

11. #11
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:25 pm, chapoutier said:

    Hey Chap – Does it occur to you that if you thought of it, maybe someone else did too?

    I refuse to believe that my keen sense of humor is not at least several days ahead of its time.

    Besides, you’re in grave danger; you’re sounding like and TYPING LIKE DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL!!!

    I almost made a Schussel crack, but I was going to leave it to soap box.

12. #12
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    I mentioned the ShamWow here a while ago. I want to say it was during the Crap Sandwich debacle. I couldn’t find the reference after a cursory search, and I’m not vindictive enough to continue looking.

    Ah, CO2 heart Mary Katherine…

13. #13
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, chapoutier said:

    I mentioned the ShamWow here a while ago. I want to say it was during the Crap Sandwich debacle. I couldn’t find the reference after a cursory search, and I’m not vindictive enough to continue looking.

    People…the issue is not a ShamWow reference in and of itself, nor is it an issue of a silly stimulus proposal.

    The real genius behind my comment was combining a hokey infomercial product WITH the stimulus. That is where the true brilliance lies and why I am crushed my idea, which I am certain must be unique, has been usurped.

14. #14
    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:59 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    And I was certain when I wrote it that it wasn’t unique. But that was during the bailouts (I think). This is different. You may have a point, chapoutier.

    Now if we could just Slap Chop this dang stimulus bill…

    Buh-dum-DSHH!

    (makes note of the date)

15. #15
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, John Deaux said:

    On February 5th, 2009 at 6:40 pm, chapoutier said:
    I mentioned the ShamWow here a while ago. I want to say it was during the Crap Sandwich debacle. I couldn’t find the reference after a cursory search, and I’m not vindictive enough to continue looking.
    People…the issue is not a ShamWow reference in and of itself, nor is it an issue of a silly stimulus proposal.

    The real genius behind my comment was combining a hokey infomercial product WITH the stimulus. That is where the true brilliance lies and why I am crushed my idea, which I am certain must be unique, has been usurped.

    Obama and ShamWow. You don’t know how long I’ve waited to post this link.

16. #16
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, chapoutier said:

    Happy to give you a segue, John.

17. #17
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:08 pm, steveegg said:

    On February 5th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, chapoutier said:

    I CANNOT BELIEVE THEY STOLE MY JOKE!!

    That’s not stealing your joke. Get me some cough syrup and I’ll show you what a stolen joke looks like.

18. #18
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:10 pm, chapoutier said:

    That’s not stealing your joke. Get me some cough syrup and I’ll show you what a stolen joke looks like.

    Is there a “/wtf is he talking about” tag?

19. #19
    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, steveegg said:

    On February 5th, 2009 at 7:10 pm, chapoutier said:

    Is there a “/wtf is he talking about” tag?

    No; I’ve come up with a script for the Sham-Lus. My voice is too far gone thanks to a chest cold to do the voice-over though.

    BTW, that would be </wtf_is_he_talking_about>.

20. #20
    On February 6th, 2009 at 11:16 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Hey, how about we all just up and send the government $19.95 without telling them what it’s for? I wonder if they’d send something back or tell us that we forget to include the shipping and handling?

21. #21
    On February 6th, 2009 at 11:33 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    I tried these <WTFIHTA> and </WTFIHTA> but they don’t seem to do anything. I’ll bring it up at the next W3C meeting.