Comments on: Ashley Judd: Clown in wolf guardian’s clothing

By: Ashley Judd is going to be like so pissed! « Danishova

Ashley Judd is going to be like so pissed! « Danishova — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:40:59 +0000

[...] caribou we were supposed to care so much about when it came to drilling in ANWR. As Michelle Malkin reported: Casting herself as an environmental expert, Judd attacked Palin for “casting aside science and [...]

By: Native Alaskans Not Interested In “Tofu Salad And Pinkberry Yogurt” : Black Bear Blog

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:19:09 +0000

[...] morning in Michelle Malkin’s syndicated column, “Ashley Judd: Clown in wolf guardian’s clothing”, she also takes Defenders of [...]

By: frostrt

frostrt — Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:27:58 +0000

On February 8th, 2009 at 11:54 am, greenLibertarian said:
It’s good that Michelle understands the need to reduce the numbers of predators that unbalance and would destroy an ecosystem. If only she would consider the need for humans, the dominant predator on this planet, to reduce their numbers also. We are destroying our habitat and other species too.

————————————–

Yes, we shouldn’t be concerned about the murdered baby in the story MM shared; after all, it was a reduction of the population of the “dominant predator on the planet”.

You, Sir or Madam, are disgusting.

By: Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (158 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT

Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:51:09 +0000

[...] (Also in syndicated column by Michelle Malkin.) [...]

By: Salt

Salt — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 20:58:21 +0000

I find it interesting that the only part of my comment to which undresiege and need2voice responded to was the last, which is essentially a distraction from the topic. No, I do not agree with abortion, even for liberals with whom I disagree. I no more own what a conservative individual says than you own everything every liberal says. But to focus on that rather than what Gov. Palin said is the distraction. I have not seen a response that discusses how the aerial fired bullet is more "disgusting" than the one fired from the ground. Nor have I seen a response about why you cannot hunt a predator animal the same way that you would hunt a grazing one. From all that I have read, the aerial approach is the most effective. The commenter I responded to voiced disgust over the technique and not the fact that it was killing wolves. I was curious about the difference.

By: greenLibertarian

greenLibertarian — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 16:54:19 +0000

It’s good that Michelle understands the need to reduce the numbers of predators that unbalance and would destroy an ecosystem. If only she would consider the need for humans, the dominant predator on this planet, to reduce their numbers also. We are destroying our habitat and other species too.

By: Patronedheart

Patronedheart — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:00:44 +0000

Well well well! Looks who’s back to see if anybody cares what they think!
By the way, if you had squirrels eating through your electric lines, causing thousands of dollars in damages to your house, I’m sure you’d be inclined to shoot a few yourself, but I digress.
While sarcasm may be the lowest form of wit, it apparently it was lost on you. I couldn’t care less what people think of what I say. I’m held to a higher accountability than that of my fellow man. But, I’ll humor you. Perhaps what I should have said is that it’s ironic that Ashley was allowed to have a life that allows her to support something denies the same right to millions of other human beings. All my other conservative friends here already realize that, and know me well enough that I would never advocate the senseless killing of babies. I have 2 children, and another on the way.
I do, however, support the God given right to hunt, no matter how it’s done. Also, my mother was too smart to make stupid decisions like:
1. Having sex out of wedlock
2. Getting pregnant out of wedlock
3. Killing a human being for the convenience of not having to take responsibility for #’s 1 and 2.
So, stuff it bozo.

By: undresiege

undresiege — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:21:44 +0000

Look whose back to check on how their stuff played. Don’t worry, your fellow conservatives let you skate. You people crack me up.

On February 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Patronedheart said:
Too bad Naomi didn’t abort.
Off to shoot some squirrels infesting my attic.

These are your words dummy. Don’t try to backtrack and spin. You said “Too bad Naomi didn’t abort.”

Own it. You’re too much of a coward to stand by your own freaken words. What, you’re worried about what the other conservatives will think about you? You forgot that you save your “nasty stuff” for youtube and Savage Nation. I could give a crap about abortion, but at least I’m not a gutless phony like you.

On February 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Patronedheart said:
Too bad Naomi didn’t abort.

Of course that earns a “Stay classy Patronedheart”. It’s a good thing your mom didn’t abort, because I wouldn’t have had the good laugh provided by post #191. Laughing Out Loud

By: Patronedheart

Patronedheart — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 03:09:17 +0000

On February 7th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, undresiege said:
On February 6th, 2009 at 7:02 pm, need2voice said:
On February 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Patronedheart said:
Too bad Naomi didn’t abort.
Off to shoot some squirrels infesting my attic.
My bad, I wrote down the wrong woman. It should have been Naomi aborting and not Winona. And no, I’m setting up a strawman, whatever the heck that means.
Well there you go Salt. Many conservatives also attacked another female conservative columnist when she refused to back Palin, by sending out “wishes” that she had been aborted. What say you about conservatives who wish abortions on liberals they loathe? Hmmmmm?

Get a life, dude. The fact of the matter is that we wouldn’t know who the hell she is if she wasn’t conceived in the first place. My point (which will probably fall on stupidity’s ears) is that these narcissistic pukes are so proud of themselves for their insignificant accomplishments that they fail to realize how blessed they are by the God that gave them their (so-called)talents, and their very lives. If they used one iota of their talent to save HUMAN lives that they use to fight for meaningless causes, the senseless murder of innocent babies might be greatly reduced. In that regard, their accomplishments are meaningless. Nobody attacked anybody else. Get over yourself.

By: miron

miron — Sun, 08 Feb 2009 02:53:27 +0000

But those who think nothing of killing animals need to re-think their positions, too. Killing innocent animals is not good, not right and harms our souls just as abortion does.

Both are ugly and unGodly and we need to rethink both activities.

I will take the first step…I acknowlegde the BOTH are forms of killing that we should avoid.

I hope you don’t plan on eating anything with chicken, pork, beef, or similar ingredients from now on. Poor innocent animals! Being slaughtered for food!

I’m now going down to my kitchen and grill some pork chops.

By: Why do celebrities want to win elections? « THE IRATE NATION

Why do celebrities want to win elections? « THE IRATE NATION — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:54:16 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin is right about Ashley Judd: her bloviating about the fate of Alaskan wolves is completely divorced from reality, so much so that she’s actually endangering environmental/conservationist work that’s doing real good. [...]

By: undresiege

undresiege — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 20:35:50 +0000

On February 6th, 2009 at 7:02 pm, need2voice said:

On February 6th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Patronedheart said: Too bad Naomi didn’t abort. Off to shoot some squirrels infesting my attic.

My bad, I wrote down the wrong woman. It should have been Naomi aborting and not Winona. And no, I’m setting up a strawman, whatever the heck that means.

Well there you go Salt. Many conservatives also attacked another female conservative columnist when she refused to back Palin, by sending out "wishes" that she had been aborted. What say you about conservatives who wish abortions on liberals they loathe? Hmmmmm?

By: Divapalooza

Divapalooza — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:38:16 +0000

I saw her on the Clinton News Network last night. What a waste of funding that goes into the Larry King Live production. Could we be any more wasteful?

By: Celebrities Watch

Celebrities Watch — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:02:55 +0000

Michelle Malkin » Ashley Judd: Clown in wolf guardian’s clothing…

[Source: Michelle Malkin] quoted: I’m glad this stupidity is in your party “base”, and I hope it spreads. Unfortunately for the left, I think smart guys like Pawlenty and Steele are going to try to fix this problem, despite the rabid…

By: regularguy

regularguy — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:41:47 +0000

I would have had a comment earlier, but I had to research just who the hell this zero (ie Judd) is. I must be behind the times, I not only didn’t know who she is, I didn’t know she’s so worthless.