A Henrietta Hughes flashback

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 11, 2009 09:16 PM

Before making a nationwide media splash with her savior President Barack Obama at the Ft. Myers revival rally, Henrietta Hughes had garnered public attention before. In 2004, she was living with her unemployed son in Rochester, NY. Good-hearted private citizens offered them help then, too, to supplement the government checks (reprinted with permission from the Rochester Democrat and Chronicle and Cynthia Benjamin, social networking editor):

Rochester Democrat and Chronicle (NY) – Wednesday, June 16, 2004
Author: DC, Cynthia Benjamin, Staff
Doctors and other medical staff volunteer time to treat patients
BY STAFF WRITER
CYNTHIA BENJAMIN

Corey Hughes ‘ thyroid gland was bothering him – again. He needed medical attention, but had no money to get it. Hughes , 33, a computer programmer who lives in Rochester, has no steady job, no health insurance, no doctor.

So, when Dr. Carolyn Mok examined him June 2 at Mercy Outreach Center on Webster Avenue, not only did Hughes get necessary treatment for his thyroid condition, he also took comfort in something else: the service was free.

Mok, 51, a medical doctor who has a practice at 175 Lyell Ave., is among hundreds of medical professionals in Monroe County – no exact number is available – who give their expertise, pro bono, to people such as Hughes – people whom physicians commonly call the underserved, the working poor, the uninsured.

In all, medical professionals – physicians, dentists, radiologists, nurses and others – devote thousands of volunteer hours each year, treating people in need, charging nothing because the patients have little or nothing to pay.

In their volunteer work, medical professionals treat everything from toothaches to heart disease.
Some volunteer on the staffs at places that serve people in need, such as St. Joseph’s Neighborhood Center, 417 South Ave., run by Sister Christine Wagner of the Sisters of St. Joseph.

Others see patients in their offices at no cost or at a reduced fee.

Art Streeter of the Finger Lakes Health Systems Agency says about one in 10 people in Monroe County does not have medical insurance, so volunteer medical professionals are vital.

“Most of the physicians look at this (volunteering) as part of what being a physician is,’’ says Nancy Adams, executive director of the Monroe County Medical Society, a group of more than 1,700 doctors from Monroe and six other counties.

“In the old days, it was just common practice (for physicians) to give back. That philosophy didn’t just go away because there are programs available to patients,’’ such as Medicaid and Family Health Plus insurance plans, Adams said.

Making ends meet

Hughes , who has not had a steady job for two years, recently took on temporary work for Superior Staffing Services, 26 Corporate Woods.

It’s tough, says the Monroe Community College graduate.

“I can’t even get a job at Wendy’s (after applying more than once),’’ he says, but “I feel good. I’m thankful to God.’’

Though Hughes wouldn’t reveal his salary, he says he doesn’t earn enough money in his temporary job to pay a doctor.

He helps take care of his mother, a breast cancer survivor who says even with Medicaid, she hasn’t seen a doctor in more than a year because she can’t afford to pay any percentage not covered by her insurance plan. Having Medicaid disqualifies her from pro bono services.

Yet she was thankful that Mok examined her son, who otherwise would not have received treatment.
“There isn’t many doctors that will see you if you don’t have insurance,’’ says Henrietta Hughes , 56. “There’s doctors, just out of the compassion and goodness of his heart, that will give his service or her service, and I’m very grateful to God.’’

CORRECTION Rochester Democrat and Chronicle (NY) – Wednesday, June 16, 2004 Author: DC, Cynthia Benjamin, Staff

Henrietta Hughes , 56, of Rochester has Medicare insurance. A story on Page 1F in the Our Towns section Wednesday described her health coverage inaccurately.

Since one of our commenters doesn’t understand the point of publishing this information, here’s the point:

The White House and the press are holding up this woman and her son as symbols of how the economic downturn has rendered people homeless and jobless.

Mrs. Hughes and her son have been jobless and receiving government assistance since at least 2004.

***

Yes, there is now a Henrietta Hughes website.

Via Dan Riehl, some more information:

Corey Hughes, who left his job in New York in early 2008, said he had been trying to take care of his mom. Both have searched for jobs and have come up empty, as have so many other Southwest Floridians. Henrietta said the family came here due to the expensive living costs in New York.

“So, I borrowed quite a bit of money to come down to Florida,” she explained.

And more: How many homes?

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: fiscal stimulus

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #201
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:18 am, bluesoc said:

    Would you care to elaborate?

    Sure. FilmLadd said

    Does that give the government the right to force me to work to fulfill this woman’s “need?”

    Forcing someone to work for another person – for any amount of time, for any reason – is slavery.

    I’m not sure who in the government is forcing him to work (although my guess is that it has something to do with the Collective)

  2. #202
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:23 am, FamilyMan said:

    blue said; forcing him to work

    The fundamental need of survival.

  3. #203
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:26 am, bluesoc said:

    The fundamental need of survival.

    That’s not the government forcing him to work.

  4. #204
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:30 am, oldcollegeguy1980 said:

    Obama and his democrat enablers wan to turn us all into Henryetta Hughes.

  5. #205
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:35 am, sonofdy said:

    bluesoc, I think he is talking about taxes being a form of slavery. I disagree with that since taxation is needed to maintain ANY society. But OVERTAXTION certianly qualifies as an injustice.

    When the government starts overspending and demands that we pay for it, there is a problem. When they overspend and DON’T pay for it. There is an even worst problem.

  6. #206
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:42 am, Dave Turson said:

    On February 11th, 2009 at 9:37 pm, chapoutier said:
    I am sure you are aware, there are degrees of poverty. … I guess You think its out of the realm of possibility that she was living on the margins and the economic downturn put another nail in the coffin. … I don’t see anything in the article cited above about them being homeless. Nice little trick there, … do you have any idea when she lost her home? Or are you just speculating?

    From MSNBC:

    Seven years ago, 37 year old Corey was fired as an IT analyst for the city of Fort Myers. When money ran out a year later, they were kicked out of the home they built in Lehigh Acres. Life has been full of moves back and forth up north, odd jobs and struggles ever since.

    From henriettahughes.com

    Hughes says she and her adult son have been homeless for “a long time.” She says her son lost his job in computer programming, and they in turn lost their house. She says she has been looking for a job, although she is on disability for cancer, but so far has not been able to find work.

  7. #207
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:46 am, chapoutier said:

    Dave, neither of those things were cited when MM posted the original post and when I made my comment on it.

    Ususally its a good idea for an author to do due diligence before making an assertion.

  8. #208
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:52 am, FamilyMan said:

    bluesoc said:
    The fundamental need of survival.
    That’s not the government forcing him to work.

    Are you in denial of basic reality?
    GEES!

  9. #209
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:55 am, FamilyMan said:

    chapoutier said:
    Ususally its a good idea for an author to do due diligence before making an assertion.

    Spoken like a Lawyer. Now if the MSM would listen to you Chappy.

  10. #210
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:55 am, Dave Turson said:

    Chap, How do you know what Michelle knew, and when? Your jumping down her throat or stompinng on her fingertips is why Web posting can become such a maze of useless information.

  11. #211
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:56 am, bluesoc said:

    Are you in denial of basic reality?
    GEES!

    I honestly don’t know what you’re arguing with me about.

    I was simply trying to say that the government does not force anyone to work. As you aptly pointed out, it is the nature of man that forces him to work.

  12. #212
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:06 am, FamilyMan said:

    Blue said; it is the nature of man that forces him to work. survive.

  13. #213
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:07 am, FilmLadd said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:03 am, bluesoc said:

    Forcing someone to work for another person – for any amount of time, for any reason – is slavery.

    Wait, who’s forcing you to work?

    When the government takes money that I have earned through my own labor, it is taking my labor, you collectivist slavemonger.

    And no amount of obfuscation changes that.

    Just because modern slavery is done at the IRS’s gunpoint in a “civilized” manner (through the medium of money) doesn’t make it any less evil than, say, forcing me to work at a plantation picking cotton for four-five months out of the year…

    Which is, I think, about the average amount of time that the average taxpayer must work to meet his burdens to your collective.

  14. #214
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:07 am, bluesoc said:

    Blue said; it is the nature of man that forces him to work. survive.

    I apologize for the typo. I’m still not sure why you were arguing with me.

  15. #215
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:13 am, FilmLadd said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:56 am, bluesoc said:

    As you aptly pointed out, it is the nature of man that forces him to work.

    No, not all men are forced by their natures to work.

    Some of them like to spend their time figuring out ways of tricking and forcing others to work for them.

    And it is the nature of collectivists to force Man to work for the State, to turn all free men into slaves for the greater good of the collective. Meanwhile the slavemongers take a piece of that pie as it’s being redistributed.

    Just get a gun and a whip and be done with it, instead of peddling propaganda to make us willing slaves. I don’t think you’re going to convince anyone here that our slavery to these collective “needs” is a good thing.

  16. #216
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:21 am, FamilyMan said:

    Survival is the fundamental need. Those who wrote our constitution deferred the understanding of our rights as coming form God. They wrote that document, which is this countries legal foundation with that belief. Those fundamental needs did not include confiscation of a person labor for others to use with the exception of the common good. Our constitution does not say the common interests.

  17. #217
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:26 am, RTater said:

    From the book The New Intellectuals – there are two types of coercion; from the witch doctor, and from the Attila.

  18. #218
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:29 am, FamilyMan said:

    in·ter·est (ntrst, -tr-st, -trst)
    a. A state of curiosity or concern about or attention to something:

    good (gd)
    1. Being positive or desirable in nature; not bad or poor:

    com·mon (kmn)
    a. Belonging equally to or shared equally by two or more; joint:

  19. #219
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:30 am, granite said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:07 am, FilmLadd said:

    One could look at it as if one has “choices”:

    1) One can not work:
    and earn no money with which to pay for food, clothing, shelter, etc;
    or, leech off funds that the government has forcibly taken from others who are working, and is distributing as it sees fit, after taking a monstrous cut for itself.

    2) Or, one can work:
    and have a large amount of the “fruits of one’s labor” forcibly taken away by the government through taxes, fees, phased-out deductions, etc; or,

    3) One can work, and try to hide income by not reporting it, and face a response from the government, which ultimately can mean the point of a gun.

    Essentially, the government is telling us that we are allowed to work “in peace” only if we agree to allow the government to extort from us much of our labor’s fruits; only then will we be free of riots and vicious looting (and what else?) caused by those who feel “entitled” to a large part of those fruits; only then, the government is essentially telling us, will we avoid the chaos, brutality, and savagery of the jungle.

    It’s sort of like the “choice” a victim of organized criminal thugs would have in the situation:
    “You have a choice: you can either sign the paper; or get a bullet in the head.”

  20. #220
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:34 am, bluesoc said:

    Those fundamental needs did not include confiscation of a person labor for others to use with the exception of the common good. Our constitution does not say the common interests.

    What does that mean for the 16th amendment?

    Also, I’m not sure of the distinction between “common good” and “common interest”

  21. #221
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:41 am, FamilyMan said:

    Interest is a mental state of curiosity.
    Good is a judgement derived from an observation.

  22. #222
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:56 am, FamilyMan said:

    Those who needed control, used the 16th amendment to modify the original intent of the constitution. They need to collect form the personal labor of it citizens. To do this they modified the word good into interest. Interest has infinite possibilities. The word good is a finite judgment. Our constitution delineated only limited rights, with the purpose of protecting the intent. The 16th amendment destroys that intent.

  23. #223
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:03 am, wighttrasch said:

    From that I guess you assume she has AIDS?

    Look who’s assuming now…

    Don’t second guess Henrietta or her son, but please feel free to do so on another poster here…

  24. #224
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    Late, but 2 cents anyway… Worked for GUV AGENCY in the 80s… Was SUPERVISOR… To be fired one must be convicted of a FELONY (major), or CAUGHT STEALING from the GUV AGENCY… No other reason will get you fired… THAT’S A FACT!!!

  25. #225
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, Joy said:

    bluesoc – Good grief…. When our wages are STOLEN by the government and given to someone else we are being FORCED to work to support that person.

    Obtuse… leftists are so obtuse…

    As to taxes, I clearly stated in an earlier post that I don’t mind paying the taxes needed for Constitutional items such as National Defense. But my money being given to someone else means I am being forced to work for their benefit instead of my own. Slavery.

  26. #226
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:05 pm, Joy said:

    Chap – I am not a Statist either. No government entity has the right to take my money to give to someone else. As Family Man pointed out, that is slavery.

    southsomebody – Or whoever compared me to Daschle… more genius democrat moral equivilency. I am opposed to taxes, yet pay them. Daschle has worked to enact laws that force people to pay taxes and he tried to get out of paying them…

    obtuse… I just can’t get over how OBTUSE Dems and leftists are…

  27. #227
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    Chap – I am not a Statist either. No government entity has the right to take my money to give to someone else.

    Unless, of course, the Constitution says it can?

    I am confused by what standard you are applying for when taxes are okay and when they are not.

  28. #228
    On February 13th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, NormalAmericanInLA said:

    Satisfaction of Mortgage. Henrietta and Corey Hughes. Lee County, FL. $124,000 Paid off in TWO YEARS. Hmmm…. Is this the Henrietta and Corey Hughes? Where’s the home now?

  29. #229
    On February 13th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, NormalAmericanInLA said:

    Quitclaim Deed. August 2006. HUGHES HENRIETTA.

  30. #230
    On February 17th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, kyconservative said:

    My husband is in the military and he has civilian employees that work “for him” and it is a nightmare. The union won’t let him move a copier without permission because it might make someone walk further to the copier and that would be unfair. He has employees who do nothing all day and others who are downright rude and insolent. I have never heard of anyone being fired. I can’t imagine what she did to get fired.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Inevitable: Obama Surpasses Bush in Debt Increase

March 20, 2012 01:12 PM by Doug Powers

95 Comments

Change

Joe Biden: Economic Theories of GOP Candidates Will Lead America to Bankruptcy

March 16, 2012 04:04 PM by Doug Powers

85 Comments

Funniest. Vice President. Ever.

Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama’s Green Robber Barons

January 25, 2012 09:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

89 Comments

Latest Supporter of Passing the Jobs Bill: God

November 2, 2011 03:09 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

“We can’t wait!”

California High Speed Rail Project Triples in Projected Cost, Won’t Be Ready for 22 Years

November 1, 2011 09:02 AM by Doug Powers

117 Comments

“Next stop, bankruptcy!”


Categories: fiscal stimulus

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook