<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kennedy will miss porkulus vote tomorrow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-622099</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 03:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-622099</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope the GOP has grown some stones since the last vote. If they could kill this porkulus, they&#039;d be well on their way to resurgence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope the GOP has grown some stones since the last vote. If they could kill this porkulus, they&#8217;d be well on their way to resurgence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MishMashZone » House Passed Spendulus Without Republicans Vote</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621878</link>
		<dc:creator>MishMashZone » House Passed Spendulus Without Republicans Vote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621878</guid>
		<description>[...] Senate is up next to vote.  Kennedy will not be there, and Gregg will be back to vote.   If the three Republicans that voted for it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Senate is up next to vote.  Kennedy will not be there, and Gregg will be back to vote.   If the three Republicans that voted for it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And The Voting Day Drama Begins &#171; Beltway Snark</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621166</link>
		<dc:creator>And The Voting Day Drama Begins &#171; Beltway Snark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621166</guid>
		<description>[...]  Jump to Comments Not only is Judd Gregg back in play in the Senate, but Kennedy is out. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, battling brain cancer, returned to Washington this week for key votes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Jump to Comments Not only is Judd Gregg back in play in the Senate, but Kennedy is out. Senator Edward M. Kennedy, battling brain cancer, returned to Washington this week for key votes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621103</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621103</guid>
		<description>Technically they are debating the H Res 168 under which the bill is going to be debated under.

The rule has to be approved first.

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically they are debating the H Res 168 under which the bill is going to be debated under.</p>
<p>The rule has to be approved first.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN_wm.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Savage24</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621104</link>
		<dc:creator>Savage24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621104</guid>
		<description>They don&#039;t need Kennedy. I heard there are at least three more RINOs ready to jump on the pork wagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They don&#8217;t need Kennedy. I heard there are at least three more RINOs ready to jump on the pork wagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621085</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621085</guid>
		<description>From the front page of CSPAN

 House &amp; Senate to Vote on $789B Stimulus Legislation
Today

HOUSE:
The House is debating the rules for considera-
tion on H.R. 1. A final vote is expected this afternoon.

SENATE:
According to Majority Leader Reid, final vote is planned for late afternoon or early evening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the front page of CSPAN</p>
<p> House &amp; Senate to Vote on $789B Stimulus Legislation<br />
Today</p>
<p>HOUSE:<br />
The House is debating the rules for considera-<br />
tion on H.R. 1. A final vote is expected this afternoon.</p>
<p>SENATE:<br />
According to Majority Leader Reid, final vote is planned for late afternoon or early evening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misscheryl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621082</link>
		<dc:creator>Misscheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621082</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The woman is clueless as to what is really above her pay grade and thinks she is in charge and everybody else needs to kiss her rings&lt;/blockquote&gt;

nail...head...

Pelosi thinks this is a monarchy and she&#039;s the queen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The woman is clueless as to what is really above her pay grade and thinks she is in charge and everybody else needs to kiss her rings</p></blockquote>
<p>nail&#8230;head&#8230;</p>
<p>Pelosi thinks this is a monarchy and she&#8217;s the queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621050</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621050</guid>
		<description>Huffington Post has a post up by Soros with his grand unifying theory of the financial universe and how to fix what is broke.

Well he ought to know since he wrote the exact path to break it just like was done but back around 1970.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huffington Post has a post up by Soros with his grand unifying theory of the financial universe and how to fix what is broke.</p>
<p>Well he ought to know since he wrote the exact path to break it just like was done but back around 1970.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621043</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621043</guid>
		<description>Staffers on both sides of the aisle are complaining to blogs about not having a &#039;final clean copy&#039;.

If Pelosi is going to Rome it is because she wants to attend the meeting of the G7 reps who the Timmy Treasury is going to meet with to hammer out the combined response to how to deal with this mess.

The woman is clueless as to what is really above her pay grade and thinks she is in charge and everybody else needs to kiss her rings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staffers on both sides of the aisle are complaining to blogs about not having a &#8216;final clean copy&#8217;.</p>
<p>If Pelosi is going to Rome it is because she wants to attend the meeting of the G7 reps who the Timmy Treasury is going to meet with to hammer out the combined response to how to deal with this mess.</p>
<p>The woman is clueless as to what is really above her pay grade and thinks she is in charge and everybody else needs to kiss her rings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wethal</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621030</link>
		<dc:creator>Wethal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621030</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My sources in DC say that AFTER the conference committee signed off on the final package after midnight, that some changes were still made to the package.

Now for that to happen, each member of the conference would have to be contacted about the change and give their approval for it.

IF some K street types got wind of something they did not like (and there are plenty saying that) they could do some heavy arm twisting to get the post facto changes made and approved.

As to the bill having to be in final legislative form prior to debate, not totally sure on that one.

But the current form at the House rules site sure is far from that.

As RedState posted this am at 5:30 you would have to read 1.5 pages per minute to get it read by the 9 am Friday vote debate…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

According to Drudge, Nancy wants to take off for Rome and wants to shove the vote through. I would hope the need for the committee to sign off on changes (no doubt made by K Street last night) would need approval. And someone will have the backbone to refuse. It doesn&#039;t look as if current House rules give much opportunity for stalling for a full read-through.

The current form of the bill is supposed to be all marked up with penned amendments, cross-outs, and pages with &quot;confidential&quot; stamped on them. (RS)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My sources in DC say that AFTER the conference committee signed off on the final package after midnight, that some changes were still made to the package.</p>
<p>Now for that to happen, each member of the conference would have to be contacted about the change and give their approval for it.</p>
<p>IF some K street types got wind of something they did not like (and there are plenty saying that) they could do some heavy arm twisting to get the post facto changes made and approved.</p>
<p>As to the bill having to be in final legislative form prior to debate, not totally sure on that one.</p>
<p>But the current form at the House rules site sure is far from that.</p>
<p>As RedState posted this am at 5:30 you would have to read 1.5 pages per minute to get it read by the 9 am Friday vote debate…</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Drudge, Nancy wants to take off for Rome and wants to shove the vote through. I would hope the need for the committee to sign off on changes (no doubt made by K Street last night) would need approval. And someone will have the backbone to refuse. It doesn&#8217;t look as if current House rules give much opportunity for stalling for a full read-through.</p>
<p>The current form of the bill is supposed to be all marked up with penned amendments, cross-outs, and pages with &#8220;confidential&#8221; stamped on them. (RS)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Revere</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621031</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Revere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621031</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see if Susan Collins is true to her word that she&#039;d vote against it if the House added stuff back in. I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see if Susan Collins is true to her word that she&#8217;d vote against it if the House added stuff back in. I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621028</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621028</guid>
		<description>Stuck away in the bill in section 1604 it raises the debt limit to a bit over 12 Trillion dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuck away in the bill in section 1604 it raises the debt limit to a bit over 12 Trillion dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CommentGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621025</link>
		<dc:creator>CommentGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621025</guid>
		<description>If you agree with the Heritage Foundations position that once additional funding under this bill is added to various programs and that you won&#039;t be able to get the Dems to go back to prior to stimulus funding levels and that they will demand keeping the new funding levels and scream anything else is a cut you will have a total cost of this bill over it&#039;s span of a bit more than 3 Trillion dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you agree with the Heritage Foundations position that once additional funding under this bill is added to various programs and that you won&#8217;t be able to get the Dems to go back to prior to stimulus funding levels and that they will demand keeping the new funding levels and scream anything else is a cut you will have a total cost of this bill over it&#8217;s span of a bit more than 3 Trillion dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katablog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621024</link>
		<dc:creator>katablog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621024</guid>
		<description>Gotta love &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/stimulus_specter_taxes/2009/02/12/181372.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this &lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt; The bill worked out in negotiations between the House and the Senate reduced the tax cuts from 42 percent of the cost of the $838 billion bill passed by the Senate, to just 35 percent of the $789.5 billion compromise bill.

Correspondingly, the spending portion of the bill rose from 58 percent in the original Senate measure to 65 percent. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta love <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/stimulus_specter_taxes/2009/02/12/181372.html" rel="nofollow">this </a><br />
<blockquote> The bill worked out in negotiations between the House and the Senate reduced the tax cuts from 42 percent of the cost of the $838 billion bill passed by the Senate, to just 35 percent of the $789.5 billion compromise bill.</p>
<p>Correspondingly, the spending portion of the bill rose from 58 percent in the original Senate measure to 65 percent. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newt Gingrich&#8217;s 12-Step Program &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/12/kennedy-will-miss-porkulus-vote-tomorrow/comment-page-1/#comment-621021</link>
		<dc:creator>Newt Gingrich&#8217;s 12-Step Program &#171; JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23165#comment-621021</guid>
		<description>[...] Gingrich&#8217;s 12-Step&#160;Program  13 02 2009   As the crap sandwich all the fly honey&#8217;s are calling the Great Fiscal Suicide Act of 2009 (aka [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gingrich&#8217;s 12-Step&nbsp;Program  13 02 2009   As the crap sandwich all the fly honey&#8217;s are calling the Great Fiscal Suicide Act of 2009 (aka [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

