Yellow is not mellow: Asian-American files $4 billion lawsuit against insensitive Miley Cyrus

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 12, 2009 06:05 AM

Teen pop star Miley Cyrus posed for a stupid photo with her friends making slant-eye gestures.

Dumb, but nothing to make a federal case out of, right?

Wrong.

Leave it to Asian-American grievance-mongers to blow things completely out of proportion.

To borrow a phrase from President Obama’s favorite inaugural preacher, Rev. Joseph Lowery, yellow is not mellow:

Miley Cyrus has said she meant no offense by a gesture that some have construed as insensitive to Asians — but one woman isn’t buying the pop star’s story, and she thinks Cyrus should pay.

TMZ reports that the Los Angeles woman, Lucie J. Kim, has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Asian Pacific Islanders living in Los Angeles County. And she’s seeking quite a payout: $4 billion.

In the controversial photo, Cyrus, 16, is shown sitting on her boyfriend Justin Gaston’s lap surrounded by a group of friends all making a stereotypical gesture by pulling their eyes into a slanted position.

…Kim’s lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Cyrus of a civil rights violation and requests at least $4,000 in damages per potential plaintiff, according to TMZ, which says a representative for Cyrus couldn’t be reached Wednesday for comment.

Litigious ethnic mau-mau-ers come in all colors. You can thank the cult of multiculturalism and victimhood chic for spawning these silly creatures.

Two words for all parties involved: Grow up.

***

Related flashback: What’s the matter with Spanish athletes?

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Yes, Malkin, multiculturalism is the problem » A Couple Things » A couple things about politics, sports, travel, and other stuff.
  2. Move over Pepsi and Coke, there’s some new competition on the shelf « Goodtimepolitics
  3. As an officially bi-racial Asian-American Woman I would like to say . . . « lookingforlissa
  4. Snowed In
  5. Stop Being So Thin Skinned | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  6. Rhymes With Right
  7. Miley Cyrus Sued | The Marmot's Hole
  8. February 16 roundup

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #619535
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:26 am, ScoopPC11 said:

    Miley Cyrus should just stay away from cameras, period. Everytime she gets her picture taken she gets into trouble.

  2. #619538
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:40 am, joannmandolin said:

    All she needs is a stint at that racial rehab joint that Kramer went to.
    And a heart to heart with Kim Jung Il; lots of hugs and tears.

    This could really co$t her dad!

  3. #619540
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:40 am, jsallan said:

    Is it just me or is the guy to the far left in dark gray, look slightly asian? I do agree with ScoopPC11, she should just stay away from cameras, she tends to attract the wrong kind of attention.

  4. #619541
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:45 am, zorro said:

    Lucie J. Kim, civil rights hero? Naaaa.

  5. #619543
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:51 am, trailortrash said:

    omg, what lawyer would take such a case?

  6. #619544
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:52 am, purplepeep said:

    You can sue no-talent idiot pop stars for “racial insensitivity”?

    Hmmm…how many millions do the rappers make?

  7. #619545
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:55 am, jamesgreenidge said:

    Still trying to figure out why she’s worth even mentioning, much less a “star”.

    James Greenidge
    Queens, NY

  8. #619546
    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:56 am, purplepeep said:

    trailortrash said:
    omg, what lawyer would take such a case?

    Now, now – it’s way to early to wake Chappy up.

  9. #619547
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:14 am, torabora said:

    Wouldn’t want to hurt Asian American’s self esteem. If this picture were to get out in the public arena via say, a lawsuit, they may find themselves behind the demographic curves in education , home ownership, income, incarceration rates, drug abuse, spousal abuse, unwed motherhood, etc.

    $4billion$$$ is probably not going to be but a down payment to prevent the destruction of an entire racial group by that photograph. $4trillion is more like it.

  10. #619549
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:23 am, RabbidSquirrel said:

    How much do you think we can get if we sue her for imitating a Caucasian in all of her other photos?

    Or for Barak Obama imitating a black guy?

  11. #619550
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:25 am, pressto said:

    omg, what lawyer would take such a case?

    Any lawyer here in CA, because they allow frivolous lawsuits like this.

  12. #619560
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:50 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Lucie J. Kim, has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Asian Pacific Islanders living in Los Angeles County.

    This is to be understood: Los Angeles is the home of Daffy Duck, Looney Tunes and assorted weird things. Lucie J. Kim fits right in. California SHOULD be our richest state; they have the size, soil, weather and resources. The weirdos such as Lucie J. Kim and Politically Aware kin have turned that land into a basket case. I would think they have bigger problems than 16 year old entertainers to worry about.

    Should be tell Rev. Joseph Lowery and Lucie J. Kim that “Mellow Yellow” was sung by a bunch of white guys?

    What’s the Matter with California?: Cultural Rumbles from the Golden State and Why the Rest of Us Should Be Shaking

  13. #619561
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:52 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    The guy on the right looks like he is making fun of gays. Just saying…

    I am an Asian on the east coast and I am going to file a lawsuit against Lucie J. Kim for discrimination. Waiting to see her settlement before I make my damage amount known. I think I have a case as I have seen the picture too and I am offended.

    Chap, will you take my case?

  14. #619562
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:52 am, jangar said:

    Does this mean we can make a case against Obama for pickin’ on us bible and gun clingin’ red-necks?

  15. #619564
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:55 am, warden said:

    I’m a white guy with naturally squinty eyes. I here and now apologize to all asians around the world. I meant no harm. I was not mocking your pain. It’s just my face.

  16. #619566
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:56 am, Ralph Gizzip said:

    If the judge had any sense (doubtful in CA) he’d throw this case out immediately and order the “plaintiff” to pay Cyrus’s legal fees.

  17. #619568
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:57 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    While I am at it, the guy in white looks like he is making fun of druggies and the guy on the left is poking fun at lgm – DUH-HUH!

  18. #619569
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:57 am, Patronedheart said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:14 am, torabora said:
    $4billion$$$ is probably not going to be but a down payment to prevent the destruction of an entire racial group by that photograph. $4trillion is more like it.

    Perhaps she took a page out of the Pelousi and Obummer playbook that describes how to pick an arbitrary number to use when hustling innocent taxpayers out of their hard earned money.

  19. #619570
    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:59 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 7:52 am, jangar said:

    Does this mean we can make a case against Obama for pickin’ on us bible and gun clingin’ red-necks?

    Forget to mention us Coconuts again and I’ll contact Ms. Kim’s lawyer; he is working at the local MickeyDs.

    Does this mean we can make a case against Obama for pickin’ on us bible and gun clingin’ red-necks & Coconuts?

    Or maybe I can be a Red Neck 2.

  20. #619571
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:00 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    innocent taxpayers

    HAHHHAHAHHAHHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

    Good one.

  21. #619574
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:04 am, MarcoPolo said:

    Maybe “grow up” is appropriate to say to the lawyers, but Cyrus is only 16. Give her a break.

  22. #619576
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:06 am, MarcoPolo said:

    The southern states should sue the progressive movement if insulting people is now illegal.

  23. #619579
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:08 am, Wade said:

    Two words for all parties involved: Grow up.

    I have two different words in mind.

  24. #619581
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:11 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    My daughter likes Hannah Montana, and my family has contributed to Disney profits with HM trinkets.

    But that girl is not really talented in any particular way. Nor are the Jonas Brothers, for that matter.

    My daughter also likes “The Suite Life”. Brenda Song is a teenaged Lucille Ball, great pratfall comedy.

    But I’d still rather watch ESPN or SPEED.

  25. #619583
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:13 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    I don’t think MC’s boyfriend is trying to “look” anything. I think he is just wasted.

    Cyrus may be a couple of years from Lindsay Lohan drunken warddrobe mishap lost career TMZ star status.

  26. #619585
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:15 am, Write Wing said:

    Is it me or she the Asian looking one in the photo? Who is suing whom again?

  27. #619586
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:17 am, jbirish said:

    To the “Asian” that was so offended….get a life. Or maybe you’re just looking for a better life on the back of someone who actually has done something with theirs. Freeloaders come in all shapes, sizes, and ethnic backgrounds.

  28. #619587
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:19 am, johnsteele said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:51 am, trailortrash said:

    omg, what lawyer would take such a case?

    Any of the 18 Bazillion lawyers we have graduated instead of doctors, nurses, engineers, chemists, physicists, etc.

    Here in Florida we have 4 medical schools but we have 11 (soon to be 12) law schools. This country is on the wrong track in soooo many ways.

  29. #619589
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:22 am, mjk said:

    Can I sue Michael Jackson for the kike thing from a few years ago? I’m still trying to recover (sob).

    Can I also sue all those rappers? Not because they’re racists and misogynists, but because they’re annoying and stupid….

    Let me know, pointless lawyers.

  30. #619590
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:22 am, rplatt said:

    $4 Billion is absurd . I’d suggest that Miley be directed to wear a sign around her neck for one month that says “Dumb ass”.

  31. #619598
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:29 am, CleanGuy said:

    Sticks and stones may break my bones
    But faces bring me millions

  32. #619602
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:34 am, rooster said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:52 am, purplepeep said:
    You can sue no-talent idiot pop stars for “racial insensitivity”?

    Hmmm…how many millions do the rappers make?

    Miley is white. Black rappers get a pass thanks to the grievance monger committees, ala, Sharpton, Jackson, the black caucus and our Kenyan Bastard in Chiefs own religious mentor, Jerry Wright.

  33. #619603
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:35 am, englishqueen01 said:

    So Michelle, when do you get a $4 billion dollar payout for all the racial epithets thrown your way for being, you know, a conservative?

    This is a joke. I think Cyrus isn’t talented enough to warrant her fame, but relatively harmless. This – like the just got outta bed photo – was in poor taste.

    So here’s a question: are we now forced to pander to the most sensitive among us? Are we going to have to be so aware of everything we say and/or do because if ONE person’s even mildly offended, we could end up in civil court (or, if some rabid hate speechers have their way, jail)?

    The wimpification of America continues.

  34. #619604
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:38 am, jangar said:

    So here’s a question: are we now forced to pander to the most sensitive among us? Are we going to have to be so aware of everything we say and/or do because if ONE person’s even mildly offended, we could end up in civil court (or, if some rabid hate speechers have their way, jail)?

    I’m offended…pay up!

  35. #619609
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:45 am, FamilyMan said:

    What is is Asian?
    Where are the lines drawn that separate the different variations of humans?
    Are you Asian Michelle?
    Will the courts come to the point where we have analyzed the human populations DNA and make legal judgments for damages proportionally to your chemical sequence?
    I am over the hill, feed up, totally sick of the race issue.
    GEEEEESSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  36. #619610
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:46 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:19 am, johnsteele said:

    Here in Florida we have 4 medical schools but we have 11 (soon to be 12) law schools. This country is on the wrong track in soooo many ways.

    Have you seen the billboards – www . whocanIsue . com? I bet they get thousands of calls a day and the leagl system is being bogged down with crap from people who want a quick fix.

    What part of Florida?

  37. #619611
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:47 am, FamilyMan said:

    What the hell is wrong with being offended?

  38. #619614
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:50 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    I’m fat. I’m watching TV all day today sitting on the couch eating Cheetos hoping I see someone sticking their belly out, or puffing their cheeks up, to look fat. I’m preparing myself now for being deeply offended.

  39. #619620
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:55 am, CantCureStupid said:

    That guy on the far left is throwing rabbit ears on Miley’s boyfriend, which is obviously insensitive to the entire rabbit kingdom. Paging PETA…

  40. #619621
    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:55 am, CantCureStupid said:

    That guy on the far right is throwing rabbit ears on Miley’s boyfriend, which is obviously insensitive to the entire rabbit kingdom. Paging PETA…

  41. #619626
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:01 am, FamilyMan said:

    In the controversial photo, Cyrus, 16

    She’s 16 years old, for GODs sake. She is supposed to be an idiot. It’s call being a kid.
    GEES!

  42. #619630
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:04 am, CantCureStupid said:

    Oops… I need BlackBerry lessons. Sorry for the double. :oops:

  43. #619632
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:06 am, Wade said:

    She’s 16 years old, for GODs sake. She is supposed to be an idiot. It’s call being a kid.
    GEES!

    Ta-Da

  44. #619636
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:08 am, englishqueen01 said:

    I’m offended…pay up!

    Yeah, um….good luck with that. ;)

  45. #619640
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:10 am, Madam President said:

    BAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!

    God, who gives a flying ****? All those people care about is money. I mean, come on, 4 BILLION? Any judge in his right mind would throw this out the window. She ought to go the Sarah Silverman route to deal with the “Asian American”.

  46. #619647
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:15 am, Storm Chaser said:

    I think Joy Beyhar (sp) or Whoopie Goldberg insulted Asians on the View a year or so ago. Why wasn’t the show sued?

  47. #619652
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:21 am, sonofdy said:

    Someone needs a thicker skin.

    :roll:

  48. #619653
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:22 am, Send_Me said:

    Miley Cyrus has said she meant no offense by a gesture that some have construed as insensitive to Asians — but one woman isn’t buying the pop star’s story, and she thinks Cyrus should pay.

    1. Apparently her friends there in the photo weren’t too offended.
    2. My beliefs are certain to offend many (e.g. homosexuals, atheists, polygamists, tax-cheats, sinners in general). I’m just going to go to the police station now and turn myself in as a potential risk to the sensitivities of others.
    3. God is about as narrow-minded as they come. Just look at the first 4 commandments: (to paraphrase) 1. “I’m God and you don’t get another one.” 2. “Don’t make anything that looks like me.” 3. “Don’t mess with my name.” 4. “Don’t mess with my day.” That’s about as closed-minded as you’re going to get. Maybe we should sue God, right?
    4. Upon reading the Constitution, I see no government imposed restrictions on liberty in order to protect the fragile sensitivities of all citizens. So honestly, someone just needs to give this woman a little cheese to go with her whine.

  49. #619655
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:23 am, sonofdy said:

    Hey, I just had a brainstorm, if this wins any money I am suing chris rock and every other black comedian for 4 billion each time the tell a “whitey” joke!!!!

    Who is in!!!! ;-)

  50. #619658
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:25 am, jangar said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:22 am, Send_Me said:
    3.

    You made my day!

  51. #619665
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:30 am, b-cat said:

    As a Scottish-American, I am deeply offended by Mike Myers’ “If it’s not Scottish, it’s cr@p” SNL skit. I intend to sue him right out of his kilt.

    Either that or he’s absolutely right and I wholeheartedly endorse his candidacy for President. You know, because he’s so kinda Scottish.

  52. #619676
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:35 am, Paul Revere said:

    As one of TEH GAYS, I’m offended by teh gays in California making complete idiots of themselves.

  53. #619681
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:37 am, frostrt said:

    I can’t help but notice that the guy in front looks Asian; apparently, he is not so offended.

    And ditto to the posters who say Ms. Cyrus would be well-advised to stay away from cameras; she can’t seem to get a picture taken or pose for the internet without some kind of bad fallout. (Of course, the fact that she tends to pose in nothing but a blanket, albeit with her back to the camera, or flash her bra doesn’t help. Maybe if she would quit doing that she’d be okay.)

  54. #619692
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:42 am, okiedokie said:

    $4 billion because she is offended!?!?!? How much does she sue for if someone farts while she is in the room?

  55. #619693
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:42 am, granite said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:10 am, Madam President said:

    Any judge in his right mind would throw this out the window.

    I think you’d have to stop right there.
    That’s the bump in the road.
    Over the decades, so many judges have not been in their right mind.

    Why else do you think America, as a special, wonderful nation, just might be on her way out?

    I would say that many judges not in their right mind have led the way in the destruction of America.

    My guess is that it’s 50-50 whether this suit gets tossed or not.

    I would not in the least be surprised if a judge comes to a decision before preliminary hearings, and then simply looks for (a) reason(s) for his decision.

    If the plaintiff is felt to be enough of a “victim”, to be enough of a mascot for the “progressives”, statists, socialists, etc; then, the suit will go forward.

    On the other hand, if the plaintiff is felt to be insufficiently a victim, the suit will likely be stopped in its tracks, for some reason a judge will think up; and the plaintiff will be thrown under the bus – in this case, apparently deservedly so.

    Remember, it’s all, and only, about money, sex, and power.

  56. #619714
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:54 am, Laree said:

    Miley Cyrus = Cash Cow = Cash Register = trying to turn her into a “slot machine” I seriously doubt pushing your eyes up on the side is life threatening or debilitating to anyone…how many have done this same thing but don’t have a huge bank account to raid?

    I have also seen people do it who wished they had cat eyes in fact there was a woman who had plastic surgery until she had cat eyes. I thought that was extreme is that kid going to sue her because she permanently fixed her eyes to tilt up at the corners.

  57. #619719
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:56 am, sbw999 said:

    Shake down. Money money money …moneeeeee…

    All it takes is a trial attorney, and a money hungry scumbag client. The case should be tossed, and fines and attorney fees assessed against the Plaintiff, and her joke of an attorney.

    More signs of the crumbling of our culture.

  58. #619720
    On February 12th, 2009 at 9:57 am, HotWeaver said:

    Which one is Cyrus? I have no idea, and the caption doesn’t say. I assume it’s the person on the left, based on the description that friends are the ones who are making faces.

  59. #619740
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:08 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    The root of all of this evil is laid squarely on the doorstep of psychology.

    That doorway leads into an Alice in Wonderland world where “evidence of injury” is projected beyond tangible or ordinary cause and affect, such as blood actually spilled or employment actually lost or membership actually denied, – to one that allows a psuedo science to declare that there is this invisible ‘wound’ in the plaintiff’s brain.

    If the pain of such ‘wounds’ could actually be measured, if their lasting affect could really be enumerated by some magical mental multimeter – we would all be suing our ex girl/boy friends! We’d be suing every doctor that failed to save the life of someone we loved; every mail carrier that brought bad news to our mailbox, every teacher that didn’t give us an ‘A’, you name it. If there really was a way to PROVE such ‘injury’ all these pseudo scientists would be out of business because nobody would need them to get on a witness stand and LIE.

    In Jaws – Hooper, Quint and Brody are comparing scars and Hooper bests them all pointing to his chest, “Mary Ellen Moffat. She broke my heart!”

    Liberals are so brainwashed with this pycho-babble that there are likely some who have ZERO clue that that line was a joke and still to this day wonder why the movie audience laughed?

    Lucie J. Kim is one of them.

  60. #619753
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:17 am, jbh45 said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 8:04 am, MarcoPolo said:
    Maybe “grow up” is appropriate to say to the lawyers, but Cyrus is only 16. Give her a break.

    Only 16, who is “worshiped” by pre-teens everywhere. I’d think she would have been more aware of her rude behavior.

    No breaks here…

  61. #619764
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:24 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Isn’t there this little thing called the 1st Amendment’s freedom of expression?

  62. #619778
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:31 am, sbw999 said:

    jbh45 said:
    Only 16, who is “worshiped” by pre-teens everywhere. I’d think she would have been more aware of her rude behavior.

    No breaks here…

    What rude behavior? She is taking a picture of made a face, who gives a rats azz? Just more of our sick society that likes to build people up, then tear them down. Add the prospect of a monied prey, then the vultures come after her, with dollar signs in their eyes. Makes me sick.

  63. #619787
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:36 am, GladzKravtz said:

    They’re getting eye lifts younger and younger these days. Maybe she was just explaining how she wanted…….Who Cares!!!

  64. #619793
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:42 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    A.E Houseman once wrote…” Terence this is stupid stuff”…… well, this lawsuit is stupid. A billion? get a life, wench( referring to the plaintiff, of course)

  65. #619794
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:43 am, need2voice said:

    Teen pop star Miley Cyrus posed for a stupid photo with her friends making slant-eye gestures.

    Dumb, but nothing to make a federal case out of, right?

    Are you kidding me Michelle? Don’t you remember this:

    Hey, Rosie O’Donnell: Did you teach
    your kids to speak “ching chong,” too?
    By Michelle Malkin • December 8, 2006 03:39 PM
    Typical Hollywood liberal: She’s the first and loudest to accuse others of bigotry–pausing only to take a breath before practicing it herself. Click to watch the video of Rosie O’Donnell on The View the other day mimicking an imagined Chinese newscast of Danny DeVito’s recent drunken appearance on the show:

    http://michellemalkin.com/2006/12/08/hey-rosie-odonnell-did-you-teachyour-kids-to-speak-ching-chong-too/

    Now that you’ve fed your readers some red meat, lets see how many actually see the hypocracy. You can’t have it both ways lady !!!

  66. #619795
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:44 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Anyone have any more Cheetos?

  67. #619802
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:46 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Oh, I’m tired of Notre Dame using an Irishman as it’s mascot. I doubt there is one player of Irish descent on it’s football team, let alone Catholic. See how silly this woman’s suit is?

  68. #619803
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:46 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    God narrow minded?

    How’s that? He is infinite. The infinite God says for us to have no other God before us. So that means I keep an infinite God before me. Seems to me to be the most open minded place to be given that there is no end to God. How much more OPEN do you want it to be?

    You don’t chose whether you will have a god before you or not you know. It will either be the infinite most open God, open beyond your imagination, OR you chose a god of your own making as in yourself, something made by man, etc. Which is more open?

    Yes, that’s right, the infinite unending GOD. George Carlson while funny had this very wrong.

    Jim

  69. #619809
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:50 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Before we get too far condemning the idiocy of this woman bringing this case, lets not let the real culprit(s) off the hook folks. /sarcasm on /sarcasm off

  70. #619811
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:51 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    This got blanked. I did something wrong. I guess I get sued now.

    /sarcasm on “Our friendly and other centered trial lawyers!” /sarcasm off

  71. #619815
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:53 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Nice try need2voice

    nowhere does Michelle advocate law suits when she was writing about Rosie.. She has stated Cyrus is an idiot for what she did… the same thing was inferred when she commented about Rosie. The issue is the lawsuit…. perhaps your voice should be stilled until you read with clarity before speaking.

  72. #619816
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:54 am, PhredE said:

    ” On February 12th, 2009 at 10:24 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Isn’t there this little thing called the 1st Amendment’s freedom of expression?”

    Only if such speech does not commit the cardinal sin (capital offense?) of offending anyone can it be tolerated. Because, in the New US of A – where political correctness is, well… *everything* – you dare not speak (or even think?) differently. Because, after all, diversity is a good thing – so long as you accept their version and concept of it.

    If your controversial speech challenges the listener, any listener, in any way, then your 1st amendment rights are hereby automatically revoked. You will be assumed guilty, and ostracized to the maximum extent their law allows.

  73. #619818
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:54 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “You can only write checks from this one checking account. You can have no other checking accounts before you. Remember this checking account is endless and you can write checks for as big as you want and as often as you need because this checking account is infinite.”

    And you want to complain that doing so cramps your style because its one “one” checking account? How’s that? Narrow minded because you are limited to just one unending checking account?

    What’s wrong with that picture?

  74. #619821
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:56 am, frostrt said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 6:52 am, purplepeep said:
    You can sue no-talent idiot pop stars for “racial insensitivity”?

    ————————————–

    Just don’t try to sue them for insensitivity to religion (unless it’s Islam) or for their often crude, TRULY insensitive lyrics and behavior. That is covered by the First Amendment – you know, the one that applies to “artists” who submerge crosses in their own urine but not to a cross displayed in a respectful way.

  75. #619822
    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:56 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “If your controversial speech challenges the listener…”

    I would add “…liberal or left or Democratic Party listener. For the rest of us though, please feel free to exercise your freedom of speech.”

  76. #619855
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Gorebot said:

    Cyrus should do more than merely defend herself.

    She should counter-sue vigorously, in order to “send a message” that flagrantly opportunistic victim-mongering idiocy will not be tolerated.

    And, she should “require an apology” from the lawsuit-filing moron.

  77. #619859
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 am, jdubya said:

    Amazing.

    Social engineers and lunatic fools are getting ACLUe. I hope they burn in their own personal hell.

    What ever happened to the classic MONTY PYTHON ways of humor.

    Gee, I wonder if the thought police will begin their Nazi burning of these works, after “To Kill a Mockingbird”?

  78. #619866
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:18 am, Common Sense said:

    Wow, and to think I was under the impression that a civil rights violation was a case of the GOVERNMENT denying you a constitutional right.

    Apparently, it now means the right not to be offended by a joke. Good thing my grandparents have passed. They had a racial nickname and joke for every group under the sun, including each other – Wops and Krauts.

  79. #619874
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:24 am, PhredE said:

    Note to Miley:

    Change your show to open up with this classic by Nirvana-

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTRXzkRis-s
    (”All Apologies”)

  80. #619884
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:31 am, ohioTom said:

    Hey, sometimes I feel devilish and I take exception to the guy making fun of devils with his two fingers behind the other guy’s head.

    It really demeans us devilish types and ruins my self-concept.

    I think I need about $35 million to make me feel better.

  81. #619893
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:36 am, Cicero said:

    Someone needs to publish a pamphlet explaining precisely the ways that we can still stretch our faces without incurring the risk of liability.

  82. #619900
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:38 am, BruceB said:

    Hey. I’ve got ADD and Carlos Mencia has made fun of me countless times. Can anyone from CA let me use your address.
    we’ll split the money.

  83. #619923
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:48 am, granite said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:31 am, ohioTom said:

    Hey, sometimes I feel devilish and I take exception to the guy making fun of devils with his two fingers behind the other guy’s head.

    It really demeans us devilish types and ruins my self-concept.

    I think I need about $35 million to make me feel better.

    We used to do that in high school, too…several decades back.

    It was then, and always has been my understanding that that sign has not so much to do with the devil, but rather indicates that the one (cuckold) over whose head the sign is made has been cuckolded, and thus is horny (Italian “cornuto”, Greek “keratas”; the “horned one”).
    I thought maybe horny, like a goat, because the cuckold’s wife is “otherwise/elsewhere engaged”; but, maybe it’s in fact horny like the devil – perhaps because the devil is the one who cuckolded the poor guy?
    Anyone have any more info?

  84. #619929
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:49 am, PhredE said:

    For BruceB –

    Yeah, I hear ya. Oh, you are talking about Ned Arnel (aka “Carlos Mencia”)?

    He’s offended me on multiple occasions too.

  85. #619930
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:50 am, sbw999 said:

    When did Asians adopt the politics of victimhood from hispanics and blacks?

  86. #619941
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:57 am, b-cat said:

    When did Asians adopt the politics of victimhood from hispanics and blacks?

    Recently, for $4 billion.

  87. #619944
    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:58 am, jlhudg23 said:

    Don’t fret over Miley’s future–she’ll just ask for a bailout.

  88. #619967
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    One comment: WHAT A F***ING IDIOT!!!

    Whoops, 2nd comment: MAYBE THIS F-ING IDIOT COULD HAVE THIS 4 BILLION ADDED TO THE “STIMULUS” PACKAGE???

  89. #619969
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, Salt said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 10:53 am, MNUSMCDavid said:

    Nice try need2voice

    nowhere does Michelle advocate law suits when she was writing about Rosie.. She has stated Cyrus is an idiot for what she did… the same thing was inferred when she commented about Rosie. The issue is the lawsuit…. perhaps your voice should be stilled until you read with clarity before speaking.

    Agreed. I also saw this as a failed attempt by need2voice.

    A key distinction here being that Rosie knew she had a large audience when she did it and pretends to be a friend to minorities as a liberal pundit. Miley was making a foolish joke that shows her age. No one is cutting Miley slack for the poor judgment, but a $4B lawsuit is ridiculous. Who does Lucie Kim think she is asking for that kind of money anyway, Nancy Pelosi?

  90. #619976
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, Salt said:

    On February 12th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Gorebot said:

    Cyrus should do more than merely defend herself.

    She should counter-sue vigorously, in order to “send a message” that flagrantly opportunistic victim-mongering idiocy will not be tolerated.

    And, she should “require an apology” from the lawsuit-filing moron.

    I agree with your sentiment, but not your approach.

    The people that win out in all these frivolous lawsuits are the lawyers, who then turn around and encourage even more of this behavior. Not all lawyers, mind you, but enough that this creates a mess of a civil legal system.

    The best thing that can happen here is to have the judge laugh this out of existence.

  91. #619982
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:13 pm, DanVanSmak said:

    Damn. She should, as an act of defiance against this lawsuit, shoot a video of her making such gestures while covering the Vapors tune “Turning Japanese.” Hell, even I’d break off the $2 to download that from I-tunes.

    *out*

  92. #619999
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, Hangfire said:

    My three kids are half-Asian. Can they get a half-settlement?

  93. #620000
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:20 pm, srhoades said:

    Two words for all parties involved: Grow up.

    And my two syllable response: A-men.

  94. #620013
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, hadsil said:

    Is it too late to sue Rosie O’donnell for “ching chong ching chong”?

  95. #620014
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    My three kids are half-Asian. Can they get a half-settlement?

    No but they can be part of a half-assed lawsuit. ;)

    (Good thing Lucie Kim has never seen Frank DeLima..)

  96. #620018
    On February 12th, 2009 at 12:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    What’s tragic is how Asians have been so discriminated against they haven’t been able to make it in America. I was just mentioning this the other day to my female Asian-American doctor, dentist and lawyer. (OK I didn’t mention it but they actually are females of Asian heritage. And their combined IQs exceed Obama’s entire cabinet several times over I think.)

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Waking up to deadly diversity

November 24, 2009 12:02 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Beerestroika: Drinking to distraction

July 30, 2009 10:27 AM by Doug Powers

216 Comments | 20 Trackbacks

Healing time for the Fighting Irish

Guess who wants Asians to change their names?

April 21, 2009 08:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Unhinged at UMass

March 12, 2009 12:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

52 Comments | 9 Trackbacks

Holder: “A nation of cowards”

February 18, 2009 03:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

198 Comments | 44 Trackbacks

Speak for yourself.

The Keith John Sampson story

December 26, 2008 01:29 PM by Michelle Malkin

37 Comments | 1 Trackback

Anti-Christmas moron of the day: Ban Rudolph!

December 15, 2008 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

114 Comments | 11 Trackbacks

It’s the PC time of year…


Categories: Political Correctness



Legal Insurrection

» Thanks, Global Warming

JustOneMinute

» The Prescient Joe Biden
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook