Yellow is not mellow: Asian-American files $4 billion lawsuit against insensitive Miley Cyrus

Teen pop star Miley Cyrus posed for a stupid photo with her friends making slant-eye gestures.
Dumb, but nothing to make a federal case out of, right?
Wrong.
Leave it to Asian-American grievance-mongers to blow things completely out of proportion.
To borrow a phrase from President Obama’s favorite inaugural preacher, Rev. Joseph Lowery, yellow is not mellow:
Miley Cyrus has said she meant no offense by a gesture that some have construed as insensitive to Asians — but one woman isn’t buying the pop star’s story, and she thinks Cyrus should pay.
TMZ reports that the Los Angeles woman, Lucie J. Kim, has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of all Asian Pacific Islanders living in Los Angeles County. And she’s seeking quite a payout: $4 billion.
In the controversial photo, Cyrus, 16, is shown sitting on her boyfriend Justin Gaston’s lap surrounded by a group of friends all making a stereotypical gesture by pulling their eyes into a slanted position.
…Kim’s lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, accuses Cyrus of a civil rights violation and requests at least $4,000 in damages per potential plaintiff, according to TMZ, which says a representative for Cyrus couldn’t be reached Wednesday for comment.
Litigious ethnic mau-mau-ers come in all colors. You can thank the cult of multiculturalism and victimhood chic for spawning these silly creatures.
Two words for all parties involved: Grow up.
***
Related flashback: What’s the matter with Spanish athletes?
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Professor: ‘Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer’ Promotes Bullying
December 5, 2011 04:39 PM by Doug Powers
136 CommentsPC Educator of the Week: Thanksgiving, Columbus Day are Insensitive Holidays
October 15, 2011 12:06 PM by Doug Powers
41 CommentsIn Australia, a chilling verdict against free speech
September 27, 2011 10:58 PM by Michelle Malkin
62 CommentsMcDonalds CEO: The Clown Stays, Food Nazis!
May 20, 2011 04:39 PM by Doug Powers
119 CommentsWho’s Up for $50 Light Bulbs?
May 17, 2011 02:24 PM by Doug Powers
126 CommentsThe Fine: $100 — The Offense: Reciting the Gettysburg Address
February 23, 2011 01:52 PM by Doug Powers
127 CommentsBill Clinton and George HW Bush Chair New ‘National Institute for Civil Discourse’
February 21, 2011 03:32 PM by Doug Powers
206 Comments
Categories: Political Correctness
JustOneMinute
» We Hear From The Department Of Good Ideas And False Choices


Pundit & Pundette
» Obama's war on conscience, cont'd
Redstate
» Media Matters

Hot Air
» Notre Dame faculty calls Obama so-called accommodation “grave violation of religious freedom”











I think that photo is hilarious. The 3 white people in the photo put on slitty eyes while the only Asian in the photo shows that “hey, I’m asian but my eyes are nothing like that!”. Maybe it’s just that I’m one of those Asians who are confident enough to have a laugh at their own expense.
Grievience mongers of any colour sicken me.
If I want to make a funny face for a picture, is it safe to squeeze my cheeks together? Or would I get sued for that?
I should probably get a legal opinion from a law firm regarding all possible funny faces.
Dear Asians,
If you are so sensitive, Please dont hesitate to move back.
I am. Arguing “poor judgement” by her is a joke, and is a symptom of our over-PC society. She didn’t beat anyone up, or call someone the “n” word, or get caught on video blowing guys in the bathroom…she made a face. Oh, the horror!!!!
The only people exercising poor judgement here is the moron suing her, and those who feel the need to assign moral equivalency to a kid goofing around with her friends.
That reminds of a nitwit trial lawyer as a guest on a talk radio program defending huge jury awards. His reasoning was that there are so many lawyers for so few ‘deep pocket’ trials that, when you manage to get retained for one, you HAVE TO go for a huge award because you might not get another case for a long time! Lawyers have got to eat ya know!
Too bad it was radio, I wished I could’ve seen his face when he said that.
On second thought … if I had seen him say that on TV I probably would have thrown something at him and broken the set.
I would be inclined to agree about the severity; however, there is still something to be said about the fact that she is still a very popular figure for young girls. It is a slight bit more than some random teenager making a face.
However, I don’t like political correctness, either. The reason I called it “poor judgment” was because it could have consequences (albeit likely minor) to her career (e.g. endorsements, PR, etc). To the average teenager, who would care? However, she earns a very large living on her image. Doing this, joke or not, did a bit of damage to her image. That’s poor judgment for someone in her place.
I’m certainly not horrified by it. I think the whole thing is rather dumb, but I also wouldn’t blame any sponsor that might choose not to use her in their advertising.
Why don’t they sue John McCain for his “gooks” comments?
A police officer’s opinion of attorneys:
An attorney was questioning a police officer in a trial, trying to cast doubt on the word of the first officer on the scene of the crime…
Atty: So you trust the other officer?
Cop: Yes, sir. I trust him with my life and the lives of my family.
Atty: You trust him that much, huh? Tell me this, detective: Do you have a locker in the police station where you keep your stuff?
Cop: Yes, sir.
Atty: And do you keep a lock on this locker?
Cop: Yes, sir. I do.
Atty: Well, if you trust your brother officers so much, why do you keep a lock on your locker?
Cop: Well, sir, our locker room is in this building, and attorneys have been seen in there.
ECS
“They” who?
Did you even bother to form a complete thought before posting this? Or was the inclusion of McCain’s name with the word “gook” enough to forgo any actual point?
Ready, Fire, Aim?
I’d accuse him of “Type, Submit, Think”…but I honestly don’t think he even thought about his comment after posting it.
I don’t understand why orientals are offended by someone noticing that they have different eyes than occidentals. (Not asians, just orientals. Asians typically have the same style of eyes that the western world has)
It’s not an insult. It’s just a difference. Why complain that someone noticed it? What’s next: The Irish are going to start complaining that people noticed that they typically have blond or red hair? The Chinese will complain that someone noticed that they all have black hair? Africans will complain that someone mentioned that their skin is darker than that of others?
Sheesh. Get over yourselves, races. We all have differences, and that’s fodder for humor. Quit trying to make humor illegal.
Ok, so blowing people up – or your girlfriend blowing herself up under your direction – is ok and results in a Profesorship and juice at the White House. Pulling your eyes back results in a $4 billion lawsuit. Yes, the Dems have made their mark.
Well Professor should be spelled correctly, but hey…
What possible grounds can there be for a lawsuit?
Napolitano’s insulting my veteran status was worse. I just consider the source and laugh it off.