<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Punish Mark Sanford Amendment; Update: Durbin defends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADF Alliance Alert &#187; The Punish Mark Sanford Amendment: &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; usurpation of state authority</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-729882</link>
		<dc:creator>ADF Alliance Alert &#187; The Punish Mark Sanford Amendment: &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; usurpation of state authority</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-729882</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: &#8220;Buried in the porkulus conference report is a provision specifically targeting governors who would exercise the choice to refuse stimulus money.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: &#8220;Buried in the porkulus conference report is a provision specifically targeting governors who would exercise the choice to refuse stimulus money.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Quotes &#171; The French Cowboy&#8217;s Plains</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-655185</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Quotes &#171; The French Cowboy&#8217;s Plains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-655185</guid>
		<description>[...] into the battle over the so-called stimulus money. After the introduction of the &#8220;Sanford amendment&#8221; he suggested that he at least be allowed to use the money to pay off debts. The answer he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] into the battle over the so-called stimulus money. After the introduction of the &#8220;Sanford amendment&#8221; he suggested that he at least be allowed to use the money to pay off debts. The answer he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Will the legality of the Punish Mark Sanford Amendment be tested?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-625917</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Will the legality of the Punish Mark Sanford Amendment be tested?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-625917</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week before the Generational Theft Act was rammed through, I called the sneaky provision to prevent governors from turning down stimulus money the &#8220;Punish Mark Sanford Amendment.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week before the Generational Theft Act was rammed through, I called the sneaky provision to prevent governors from turning down stimulus money the &#8220;Punish Mark Sanford Amendment.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If you oppose stimulus, don't take the money - Political Wrinkles</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-624096</link>
		<dc:creator>If you oppose stimulus, don't take the money - Political Wrinkles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-624096</guid>
		<description>[...] didn&#039;t read the fine print in the stimulus bill...(get ready to get pissed OBJECTIVE members)...  The Punish Mark Sanford Amendment   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] didn&#8217;t read the fine print in the stimulus bill&#8230;(get ready to get pissed OBJECTIVE members)&#8230;  The Punish Mark Sanford Amendment   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flaming_o</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622730</link>
		<dc:creator>flaming_o</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622730</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 13th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, &lt;strong&gt;bluesoc &lt;/strong&gt;said: 

The states won’t be forced to pay for it. The PEOPLE in the states will be forced to pay for it. That’s an important distinction.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

A distinction without a difference, it seems. Really, now. Since we&#039;re talking the stimulus bill and the economic burden that will follow (whether a state &quot;opts out&quot; or not), who in this country doesn&#039;t &quot;pay for it&quot; besides the people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 13th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, <strong>bluesoc </strong>said: </p>
<p>The states won’t be forced to pay for it. The PEOPLE in the states will be forced to pay for it. That’s an important distinction.</p></blockquote>
<p>A distinction without a difference, it seems. Really, now. Since we&#8217;re talking the stimulus bill and the economic burden that will follow (whether a state &#8220;opts out&#8221; or not), who in this country doesn&#8217;t &#8220;pay for it&#8221; besides the people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bear Creek Ledger &#187; State&#8217;s Rights</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622546</link>
		<dc:creator>Bear Creek Ledger &#187; State&#8217;s Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622546</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin: It’s an obvious end-run around the authority of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, the outspoken [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin: It’s an obvious end-run around the authority of South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, the outspoken [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.N. Smithee</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622321</link>
		<dc:creator>L.N. Smithee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622321</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m telling you, folks, an &quot;It CAN happen here&quot; chill went up me when I read that amendment that I haven&#039;t felt since 9/11.  

In the same way that Maxine Waters&#039; slip of the tongue in May 2008 saying &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;This liberal will be all about socializing&quot; oil companies&lt;/a&gt; took on new weight as she ranted and raved that the banks had to dance to her tune because they were forced to take bailout money.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CmDtxRqtIo&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Watch the first couple of minutes of this &lt;I&gt;60 Minutes&lt;/i&gt; interview in which Ken Lewis of Bank of America agrees that Paulson&#039;s &quot;bailout&quot; was actually an ultimatum&lt;/a&gt; (&quot;Take it, or take it,&quot; as Lesley Stahl says).  Lewis scrambles when Stahl plays devil&#039;s advocate and asks, &quot;Is this socialism?&quot; at 3:45. 

ArizonaNeanderthal wrote: &lt;blockquote&gt;Woodrow Wilson was the first President I know of to openly call for ignoring or replacing the Constitution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s been less than an month, and despite all the comparisons of Obama to Lincoln, he&#039;s already acting like Wilson, who had an industrial strength Messiah complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m telling you, folks, an &#8220;It CAN happen here&#8221; chill went up me when I read that amendment that I haven&#8217;t felt since 9/11.  </p>
<p>In the same way that Maxine Waters&#8217; slip of the tongue in May 2008 saying <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUaY3LhJ-IQ" rel="nofollow">&#8220;This liberal will be all about socializing&#8221; oil companies</a> took on new weight as she ranted and raved that the banks had to dance to her tune because they were forced to take bailout money.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CmDtxRqtIo" rel="nofollow">Watch the first couple of minutes of this <i>60 Minutes</i> interview in which Ken Lewis of Bank of America agrees that Paulson&#8217;s &#8220;bailout&#8221; was actually an ultimatum</a> (&#8220;Take it, or take it,&#8221; as Lesley Stahl says).  Lewis scrambles when Stahl plays devil&#8217;s advocate and asks, &#8220;Is this socialism?&#8221; at 3:45. </p>
<p>ArizonaNeanderthal wrote:<br />
<blockquote>Woodrow Wilson was the first President I know of to openly call for ignoring or replacing the Constitution.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s been less than an month, and despite all the comparisons of Obama to Lincoln, he&#8217;s already acting like Wilson, who had an industrial strength Messiah complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lowandslow</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622227</link>
		<dc:creator>lowandslow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622227</guid>
		<description>Maybe this isn&#039;t so terrible after all. This could provide some political cover for a guy like Sanford. You can refuse to request any funds from this boondoggle knowing full well the state legislatures will be lining up at the trough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this isn&#8217;t so terrible after all. This could provide some political cover for a guy like Sanford. You can refuse to request any funds from this boondoggle knowing full well the state legislatures will be lining up at the trough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AllMilitary.com - Official Military Blog, Military Updates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Saturday Claw 2-14-09</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622180</link>
		<dc:creator>AllMilitary.com - Official Military Blog, Military Updates &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Saturday Claw 2-14-09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622180</guid>
		<description>[...] bill also includes a provision that doesn’t allow Governors to turn down money that is being pushed on their state. In other words, the federal government has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bill also includes a provision that doesn’t allow Governors to turn down money that is being pushed on their state. In other words, the federal government has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waveman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-622152</link>
		<dc:creator>waveman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-622152</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On February 13th, 2009 at 12:56 pm, genso said:

    BTW, does SC allow concealed carry?

nail49….I’m disappointed you had to ask. Yes. That said, there’s some question about transporting a loaded weapon in a vehicle even with a CWP. Two workarounds most do here. Some lock them in the glove compartment, others don’t get caught speeding. ;)&lt;/blockquote&gt;Not a problem carrying in a vehicle, even without a CWP.
&lt;em&gt;SC Code of Law §16-23-20. Unlawful carrying of handgun; exceptions.

It is unlawful for anyone to carry about the person any handgun, whether concealed or not, except as follows, unless otherwise specifically prohibited by law: 

9) a person in a vehicle if the handgun is:

(a) secured in a closed glove compartment, closed console, closed trunk, or in a closed container secured by an integral fastener and transported in the luggage compartment of the vehicle; however, this item is not violated if the glove compartment, console, or trunk is opened in the presence of a law enforcement officer for the sole purpose of retrieving a driver&#039;s license, registration, or proof of insurance; or

(b) concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;&lt;/em&gt; 

There&#039;s also a bill before the legislature right now to allow CWP holders to carry under the seat as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On February 13th, 2009 at 12:56 pm, genso said:</p>
<p>    BTW, does SC allow concealed carry?</p>
<p>nail49….I’m disappointed you had to ask. Yes. That said, there’s some question about transporting a loaded weapon in a vehicle even with a CWP. Two workarounds most do here. Some lock them in the glove compartment, others don’t get caught speeding. <img src='http://s.michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/themes/mm/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p></blockquote>
<p>Not a problem carrying in a vehicle, even without a CWP.<br />
<em>SC Code of Law §16-23-20. Unlawful carrying of handgun; exceptions.</p>
<p>It is unlawful for anyone to carry about the person any handgun, whether concealed or not, except as follows, unless otherwise specifically prohibited by law: </p>
<p>9) a person in a vehicle if the handgun is:</p>
<p>(a) secured in a closed glove compartment, closed console, closed trunk, or in a closed container secured by an integral fastener and transported in the luggage compartment of the vehicle; however, this item is not violated if the glove compartment, console, or trunk is opened in the presence of a law enforcement officer for the sole purpose of retrieving a driver&#8217;s license, registration, or proof of insurance; or</p>
<p>(b) concealed on or about his person, and he has a valid concealed weapons permit pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23;</em> </p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a bill before the legislature right now to allow CWP holders to carry under the seat as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Surveyor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-621987</link>
		<dc:creator>Surveyor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-621987</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;So, let’s say the stimulus passes and the country doesn’t go bankrupt or collapse. Will you guys quit with all the conspiracy theories then?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

the camps! the camps are coming!!
/sarc

no seriously though.....bluesoc, the country is ALREADY bankrupt.  We are heading towards a collapse as we speak... (have you seen the price of gold lately?) And what these politicians are doing is out in the open for anyone with the ability to connect simple dots to see (that&#039;s what the media was supposed to do), so as far as it being &quot;conspiracy theory&quot;....it&#039;s a conspiracy alright...but not theory.  And if you ask me how the price of gold has anything to do with looming collapse, then it will just confirm to me that you wouldn&#039;t understand the depth of it all anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>So, let’s say the stimulus passes and the country doesn’t go bankrupt or collapse. Will you guys quit with all the conspiracy theories then?</p></blockquote>
<p>the camps! the camps are coming!!<br />
/sarc</p>
<p>no seriously though&#8230;..bluesoc, the country is ALREADY bankrupt.  We are heading towards a collapse as we speak&#8230; (have you seen the price of gold lately?) And what these politicians are doing is out in the open for anyone with the ability to connect simple dots to see (that&#8217;s what the media was supposed to do), so as far as it being &#8220;conspiracy theory&#8221;&#8230;.it&#8217;s a conspiracy alright&#8230;but not theory.  And if you ask me how the price of gold has anything to do with looming collapse, then it will just confirm to me that you wouldn&#8217;t understand the depth of it all anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail49</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-621870</link>
		<dc:creator>nail49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-621870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This is about WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;And MOST OF US WANT THAT.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;eagledroppping&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: So did Jesse James, Ma Barker, Bonnie and Clyde, etc.  They went about it with guns.  SFNan and Dingy Reid are doing it with laws, but the result is the same -- we get hosed, others get enriched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This is about WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>And MOST OF US WANT THAT.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><strong>eagledroppping</strong></em>: So did Jesse James, Ma Barker, Bonnie and Clyde, etc.  They went about it with guns.  SFNan and Dingy Reid are doing it with laws, but the result is the same &#8212; we get hosed, others get enriched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nail49</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-621862</link>
		<dc:creator>nail49</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-621862</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Grow up&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;
Go to school.
Earn a degree.
Get a job.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Dex&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;:  Fixed it for ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
<em><strong>Grow up</strong></em><br />
Go to school.<br />
Earn a degree.<br />
Get a job.</p></blockquote>
<p><em><strong>Dex</strong></em>:  Fixed it for ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter Alarius</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-621855</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter Alarius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-621855</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;eaglehaslanded said: 
This is about WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.
And MOST OF US &lt;strong&gt;(Slackers)&lt;/strong&gt; WANT &lt;strike&gt;THAT&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strong&gt;to live off the hard work and initiative of others&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Go to school.
Earn a degree.
Get a job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>eaglehaslanded said:<br />
This is about WEALTH REDISTRIBUTION.<br />
And MOST OF US <strong>(Slackers)</strong> WANT <strike>THAT</strike> <strong>to live off the hard work and initiative of others</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>Go to school.<br />
Earn a degree.<br />
Get a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluesoc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/13/the-punish-mark-sanford-amendment/comment-page-2/#comment-621833</link>
		<dc:creator>bluesoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23194#comment-621833</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll concede If I am wrong. What will do if we are right? Oh I forgot you are already a Lt. in the Obama army so you will have that silverlining. Us poor Conservatives will be rounded up and placed in detention centers. So you are in a win win situation. Typical.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What does that even mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’ll concede If I am wrong. What will do if we are right? Oh I forgot you are already a Lt. in the Obama army so you will have that silverlining. Us poor Conservatives will be rounded up and placed in detention centers. So you are in a win win situation. Typical.</p></blockquote>
<p>What does that even mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

