The barbaric Muslim beheading in Buffalo

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 14, 2009 11:22 AM

Do you think this will get as much attention from the MSM as, say, the Ted Haggard scandal or Pat Robertson’s Teletubbies remarks?

Somehow, I doubt it. (Link):

Orchard Park police are investigating a particularly gruesome killing, the beheading of a woman, after her husband — an influential member of the local Muslim community — reported her death to police Thursday.

Police identified the victim as Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37. Detectives have charged her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, with second-degree murder.

“He came to the police station at 6:20 p.m. [Thursday] and told us that she was dead,” Orchard Park Police Chief Andrew Benz said late this morning.

Muzzammil Hassan told police that his wife was at his business, Bridges TV, on Thorn Avenue in the village. Officers went to that location and discovered her body.

Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.

The killing apparently occurred some time late Thursday afternoon. Detectives still are looking for the murder weapon…

Daniel Pipes has been tracking Bridges since 2004. See this helpful timeline updated with the latest gruesome developments. Pipes notes:

1) No, this is not at all obviously about domestic violence. It is obviously about a totalitarian ideology in our midst that authorities like district attorneys refuse to open their eyes to. Phyllis Chesler establishes this point beyond a doubt in a forthcoming Middle East Quarterly article, “Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence?” Spring 2009, pp. 61-69.

Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Muzzammil Hassan: Relieved His Wife Of Her Head | Democrat = Socialist
  2. Cultural Inequality; Honour Killings in Western Lands « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  3. Religion of Pieces Alert: Beheading In New York « The Chronicles Of Two Rogue Jews
  4. Council Row Moronicity [Dan Collins]
  5. A Murder in the Family
  6. Saudi Arabia Sentences Rape Victim to 200 Lashes - Page 13 - Ford Mustang Forums
  7. President Obama and the Terrorists - Ford Mustang Forums
  8. Even more Islamic Religious Tolerance | Political Byline
  9. Muslim Beheading In Buffalo–No News Coverage…
  10. Islam is a peaceful religion, muslims are peaceful people - Muzzammil Hassan beheads his wife in Buffalo NY | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  11. Tel-Chai Nation
  12. Tragedy in Buffalo. « Charlie Brown at 40
  13. UPDATE 14 FEB - Feds want your medical records (Economic stimulus?) « Goodtimepolitics
  14. Ed Driscoll » “Obviously, This Is The Worst Form Of Domestic Violence Possible”
  15. Trying To Combat Negative Perceptions By Beheading His Wife «
  16. Buffalo Muslim Who Launched TV Network to Show Muslims in Positive Light Arrested — for Beheading His Wife « Goodtimepolitics
  17. The barbaric Muslim beheading in Buffalo — But As For Me
  18. Rhymes With Right
  19. Buffalo Man Starts TV Network to Show Muslims in a Positive Light Beheads His Wife in Honor Killing « The IUSB Vision Weblog
  20. Headless body in gutless press [Mark Steyn] » Winds Of Jihad
  21. -Muslim ‘Honor’ Beheading in Buffalo? | ANSWERS For The Faith
  22. Bridges Muslim TV Founder, Muzzammil Hassan, Charged with Decapitating his Wife 37 Year Old Aasiya Zubair | Scared Monkeys
  23. Chew on this: CNN a go-go, Brangelia gets creeped out « Chockblock’s blog
  24. Random-American » Muslim Man Beheads Wife in Buffalo
  25. Woman “BEHEADED” IN Buffalo, New York: WTF « Dianej’s Weblog
  26. Got Some Fresh Bad Ideas? Email me! » Blog Archive » My Bloody Valentine
  27. Head in the Sand « Doc Cochran’s Weblog
  28. Raghead Rage: The Religion of “Peace” farce continues « Mark Epstein
  29. Muslim Beheading in Buffalo | Doug Jumper
  30. Did this Pig just eat islam? « Combating Moonbat News
  31. Muslims in America… « Time for Thorns
  32. -Beheadings and Honor Killings just Domestic Violence? | ANSWERS For The Faith
  33. -Beheadings and Honor Killings part of Islam? | APOLOGETICA
  34. Michelle Malkin » Muslim TV exec pleads not guilty in wife beheading
  35. Fausta’s Blog » Blog Archive » The sanctioning of violence
  36. rjjrdq's America II
  37. RUTHFULLY YOURS » Blog Archive » Islam, Europe and Philosophical ‘Continental Drift’

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #623034
    On February 15th, 2009 at 7:49 pm, chapoutier said:

    So, how many more thousands of years before Islam catches up with the rest of us since “our” culture figured out long ago it is not a good thing to have honor killings or kill infidels?

    Well, Islam was established about 600 years after Christianity. The Spanish Inquisition, which I would say definitely condoned killing infidels, officially ended in 1834, but really died out around 1700, which was 309 years ago, so I guess we owe the Muslims another 291 years or so before we have a right to complain?

  2. #623038
    On February 15th, 2009 at 7:56 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On February 15th, 2009 at 7:49 pm, chapoutier said:

    Well, Islam was established about 600 years after Christianity. The Spanish Inquisition, which I would say definitely condoned killing infidels, officially ended in 1834, but really died out around 1700, which was 309 years ago, so I guess we owe the Muslims another 291 years or so before we have a right to complain?

    Chap,
    Wait until the Judgement. Jesus’ll kill then like no one ever has before. Don’t want this to happen but it must.

  3. #623041
    On February 15th, 2009 at 8:01 pm, chapoutier said:

    Just to avoid any confusion, #379 was a sarcastic comment.

    But, in response to Jet, I do not fear Jesus killing me. Cirrhosis will have taken me long before he can get his hands on me.

  4. #623066
    On February 15th, 2009 at 8:23 pm, right4life said:

    Spanish Inquisition, which I would say definitely condoned killing infidels, officially ended in 1834, but really died out around 1700, which was 309 years ago, so I guess we owe the Muslims another 291 years or so before we have a right to complain?

    oh please the SPANISH INQUISITION…the BOOGEY MAN is gonna get ya…I get SO tired of the atheists and muslim apologists bringing this up…the inquisition killed all of what 2,000 people?? compared to the hundreds of millions of people the muslims slaughtered and enslaved over the millenia??

    its laughable.

    But, in response to Jet, I do not fear Jesus killing me. Cirrhosis will have taken me long before he can get his hands on me.

    you should fear what He may do to you after you are dead…

  5. #623073
    On February 15th, 2009 at 8:33 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On February 15th, 2009 at 8:01 pm, chapoutier said:

    …Cirrhosis will have taken me long before he can get his hands on me

    .

    Wow, I hope the Judgment isn’t that close! :) …and I pray for your liver to hold up.

  6. #623075
    On February 15th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, chapoutier said:

    oh please the SPANISH INQUISITION…the BOOGEY MAN is gonna get ya…I get SO tired of the atheists and muslim apologists bringing this up…the inquisition killed all of what 2,000 people?? compared to the hundreds of millions of people the muslims slaughtered and enslaved over the millenia??

    its laughable.

    I know you are functionally retarded, so I will excuse the fact that you missed my next post.

    you should fear what He may do to you after you are dead…

    Ooops. I guess you did see that post. So now I don’t know how to excuse you. But in response: I stopped being afraid of boogey men (God, Spanish Inquisition or otherwise) around the age of 8.

  7. #623082
    On February 15th, 2009 at 9:05 pm, Trollman said:

    chapoutier said:

    I stopped being afraid of boogey men (God, Spanish Inquisition or otherwise) around the age of 8.

    Which confirms my suspicion that your decision not to believe in God is based upon an immature, uninformed mindset.

  8. #623096
    On February 15th, 2009 at 9:20 pm, chapoutier said:

    Which confirms my suspicion that your decision not to believe in God is based upon an immature, uninformed mindset.

    This is laughable due to the fact that most people are indoctrinated into the religion they ascribe to long before they are capable of even formulating rational thought. Seriously. How many here actually actually seriously gave any consideration to any other religion other than the one that they happened to be born into? And I am not talking Baptist v. Methodist or even Catholic v. Protestant.

    But in any case, my “childish” conclusion has been confirmed by many years of actual observation and study.

    But you keep on believing whatever you want, brother.

  9. #623098
    On February 15th, 2009 at 9:22 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I don’t give a rat’s behind about Native American’s issues about the government’s treatment of them. Anyone who would ever do a study of the tribes would learn the treatment they gave their enemies…. the horror they did to the enemy tribes. Will you people ever learn about cultures…

  10. #623104
    On February 15th, 2009 at 9:33 pm, Trollman said:

    chapoutier said:

    But in any case, my “childish” conclusion has been confirmed by many years of actual observation and study.

    I have never personally met (whether in person, or through a discussion on the Internet) an atheist who claimed anything else. I don’t ever recall meeting an atheist that admitted “I haven’t really studied it in depth, I simply chose not to believe because it all just sounded silly to me.”

    This, despite the fact that virtually all (I can think of one exception, and he was an agnostic, not an atheist) that I have talked with were #1. ignorant of the best arguments for the existence of God (even though they insisted they had studied the matter in depth), & #2. had demonstrably faulty reasoning among their key points for supporting their atheism.

  11. #623133
    On February 15th, 2009 at 10:35 pm, frontierguy said:

    This is laughable due to the fact that most people are indoctrinated into the religion they ascribe to long before they are capable of even formulating rational thought.

    Like the Muslims? Even if you don’t believe in a God I think most smart people would want their neighbors indoctrinated in a religion that does not teach death to non-believers. That is what the Quran says no matter how much you try to make it not so.

  12. #623139
    On February 15th, 2009 at 10:57 pm, right4life said:

    I know you are functionally retarded, so I will excuse the fact that you missed my next post.

    I may be, but then what does that say about you, when I manage to make you look like the idiot you are regularly…not that you really need any help…

    I stopped being afraid of boogey men (God, Spanish Inquisition or otherwise) around the age of 8.

    thanks for confirming what fool you are.

    keep bending over for your racist hairygod darwin..lets see him save you…

    let me guess, you’re fat as well as stupid!

  13. #623140
    On February 15th, 2009 at 10:58 pm, right4life said:

    But in any case, my “childish” conclusion has been confirmed by many years of actual observation and study.

    this from someone who thinks evolution is the mechanism for evolution…

    such stupidity has to hurt…

  14. #623160
    On February 16th, 2009 at 12:43 am, FireBlogger said:

    I’m curious. Is anyone here friends with any Muslims?

    Yes, the man who bought my old home is Muslim. Hamid was ushered out of Iran at age 14 by his father and shipped to Austria to go to school.
    He runs a trucking company here in the US now.
    He is one of the most peaceful men I have ever met.
    One time he called me from the road in Wyoming. I asked him what he was hauling and he told me “dynamite”.

    I laughed out loud at the irony. An Iranian immigrant hauling dynamite coast to coast with no interference.

    Well before September 11 Hamid and a couple of his Iranian friends stopped over to see my new house and during our conversation he and his friends explained how they were convinced, as are all in Iran that the US would some day invade.
    I was shocked they thought this.

  15. #623207
    On February 16th, 2009 at 7:56 am, chapoutier said:

    I have never personally met (whether in person, or through a discussion on the Internet) an atheist who claimed anything else. I don’t ever recall meeting an atheist that admitted “I haven’t really studied it in depth, I simply chose not to believe because it all just sounded silly to me.”

    Likewise, I meet very few Christians who admit their religion is entirely dependent on the fact that their parents happened to be Christian.

  16. #623208
    On February 16th, 2009 at 7:59 am, chapoutier said:

    I may be, but then what does that say about you, when I manage to make you look like the idiot you are regularly…not that you really need any help…

    You’re right of course, darling. But how is that paper on carbon dating coming along? All these numbers confuse lummoxes like me so. I mean how can carbon dating definitively date something 50,000 years old when the earth is only 6,000? Is God just a big trickster?

  17. #623213
    On February 16th, 2009 at 8:25 am, John Deaux said:

    On February 16th, 2009 at 7:59 am, chapoutier said:
    Is God just a big trickster?

    Have you seen the platypus?

  18. #623239
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:13 am, Trollman said:

    chapoutier said:

    I have never personally met (whether in person, or through a discussion on the Internet) an atheist who claimed anything else. I don’t ever recall meeting an atheist that admitted “I haven’t really studied it in depth, I simply chose not to believe because it all just sounded silly to me.”

    Likewise, I meet very few Christians who admit their religion is entirely dependent on the fact that their parents happened to be Christian.

    Come on chappy, surely you can do better than that!

    How does one prove that one’s personal bias didn’t play a role in forming one’s conclusions? Even if they did, that doesn’t prove their conclusions false. You say “You just believe in God because you were raised to believe in God.” In return, the Christian could say to you, “You choose to disbelieve in God because it frees you to be an immoral liberal.”

    What to do, what to do?

    That is why I prefer to stick to things that are more easily provable. If someone claims they really did their homework on a subject matter, it is a small thing to find out if they actually know what they are talking about, or if they are just blowing smoke.

  19. #623252
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:25 am, norm1111 said:

    oh please the SPANISH INQUISITION…the BOOGEY MAN is gonna get ya…I get SO tired of the atheists and muslim apologists bringing this up…the inquisition killed all of what 2,000 people??

    Much worse than that…the lefties always call the NAZIs Christains and tout the atrocities performed by them. Yet they purposely ignore leftie facism..ie..Stalinism and the murder of 50 million people in the name of atheistic ideals.

    And radical Islam murders in one month nearly as many as the 300 years of the Spanish Inquisition..another glaring elimiation of reality by the empty headed, drug addled American left.

    Monthly Jihad Report
    January 2009 Jihad Attacks: 157
    Countries: 11
    Dead Bodies: 566
    Critically Injured: 846

    And as of today…Islam has carried out 12,474 murderous attacks since Sept. 11, 2001. If this chapoutier had any ethics or even the slightest interest in the truth, he could have found all this information in a couple of minutes. But, typical of the left, truth always gets in the way, so….uhh…ignore it and make up a nice strawman instead.

  20. #623254
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:29 am, chapoutier said:

    You just believe in God because you were raised to believe in God.”

    No. I said one has a mighty strong predisposition toward the religion of one’s parents, not necessarily a generic belief in God.

    I just find it curious that the issue that many people seem to be the most certain about is one in which their opinion was formed mostly on the basis of chance. Had right4life been born the same in every way except to Hindu parents, methinks she would most likely not be Christian. Impossible to prove of course, but highly logical and probable.

  21. #623255
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:31 am, right4life said:

    On February 16th, 2009 at 7:59 am, chapoutier

    with all that bending over for darwin, doesn’t it hurt to sit down?

  22. #623258
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:32 am, right4life said:

    Had right4life been born the same in every way except to Hindu parents, methinks she would most likely not be Christian. Impossible to prove of course, but highly logical and probable.

    methinks you’ve got a ‘thang’ for me. keep dreaming gurl.

  23. #623264
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:36 am, chapoutier said:

    I also eagerly await your treatise on how one species that may confound current models is outweighed by the literally thousands and thousands of species that fit quite nicely with current evolutionary theory. If you could, and since you are so keen on focusing on one species at a time, please feel free to start with “aardvark” and call me when you hit “zebra”.

  24. #623265
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:37 am, right4life said:

    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:36 am, chapoutier said:

    why don’t you explain the mechanism for evolution first. this should be good…

  25. #623267
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:38 am, right4life said:

    outweighed by the literally thousands and thousands of species that fit quite nicely with current evolutionary theory

    and why don’t you list the exact sequence of mutations that led to an eye…in order please.

  26. #623275
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:44 am, right4life said:

    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:36 am, chapoutier said:

    oh and chappy, please explain bacterial species to me…since you’re an expert on ’species’

  27. #623276
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:44 am, chapoutier said:

    and why don’t you list the exact sequence of mutations that led to an eye…in order please.

    I know…its so much easier to just say some big dude living beyond the clouds thought of an eye and PRESTO CHANGO! AN EYE!

    Saves you from the nasty proess of actually thinking and proving things.

  28. #623280
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:47 am, right4life said:

    I know…its so much easier to just say some big dude living beyond the clouds thought of an eye and PRESTO CHANGO! AN EYE!

    oh ok, then prove it, and list the sequence of mutations in order…

    and explain why the squid is so similar to a human eye…when they are so unrelated…and please don’t say the magic words ‘convergent evolution’

    this should be good…

  29. #623282
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:49 am, right4life said:

    Saves you from the nasty proess of actually thinking and proving things.

    and while you’re ‘proving’ things..why don’t you evolve a bacteria into a multi-cellular animal…should be easy…and it would prove evolution beyond a doubt.

    or mix a few chemicals together, and create a new life form!!

    should be easy…right???

    all ya got is words…just words… :P

  30. #623283
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:49 am, englishqueen01 said:

    I also eagerly await your treatise on how one species that may confound current models is outweighed by the literally thousands and thousands of species that fit quite nicely with current evolutionary theory. If you could, and since you are so keen on focusing on one species at a time, please feel free to start with “aardvark” and call me when you hit “zebra”.

    There are gaps in evolutionary theory. Which is why it’s still just a theory. As right4life pointed out, the evolution of the eye is just one example that pure evolutionary theory can’t explain.

    While other Christians will disagree with me, there’s nothing incompatible with Catholicism that says creation didn’t take longer than the seven days as we know them, nor is there anything that’s incompatible with intelligent design – evolutionary theory with a primary mover. There’s no reason to believe God wouldn’t design animals to change and adapt. In fact, the Vatican reiterated that very point of view just recently.

    Which supports parts of evolutionary (intelligent design) theory. And vice versa.

    Also, if I find a watch on the beach, it’s not logical to assume the watch was randomly assembled in the chaos of the ocean and appeared on the beach as a watch. Likewise, it’s not logical to assume we, and the animals, developed as we developed through a series of chaotic events without external influence. There’s too much order and sense in the world, not to mention the amazing power of human reasoning and self-awareness, to make be believe all this was just a happy accident.

    Somewhere, there is a Primary Mover (the watchmaker) who made that watch on the beach. Likewise, nothing cannot create something, so there had to be a primary force that spurred creation.

  31. #623285
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:51 am, chapoutier said:

    and please don’t say the magic words ‘convergent evolution’

    Why not? Because you don’t like it?

    Just because there is a long long way between the common ancestor of man and squid does not mean it is not there, and I’ll accept the notion that evolutionary forces can lead to similar (not the same mind you) optimal solutions in different species more than I beilieve in some deity inventing things out of thin air.

  32. #623288
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:53 am, chapoutier said:

    all ya got is words…just words…

    Can you please use some of those fancy words to explain how carbon dating coincides with a 6,000 year old earth?

  33. #623299
    On February 16th, 2009 at 9:58 am, right4life said:

    Why not? Because you don’t like it?

    because its meaningless…like natural selection…the same thing evolved in two radically different lines..SHAZAM, ain’t evolution sumthin???

    laughable.

    , and I’ll accept the notion that evolutionary forces can lead to similar (not the same mind you) optimal solutions in different species more than I beilieve in some deity inventing things out of thin air.

    in other words you have FAITH in your hairygod darwin. can’t see it, can’t explain it, other than IT HAPPENED..PRAISE DARWIN!!!

    you darwiniacs are beyond stupid. claiming to be wise, they have become fools…

  34. #623305
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:01 am, right4life said:

    Can you please use some of those fancy words to explain how carbon dating coincides with a 6,000 year old earth?

    here explain this…

    The late Triassic-early Jurassic predates Archaeopteryx, the most primitive bird known, which first appears in the fossil record in the late Jurassic fifty million or more years later. Yet here we have convincing traces of modern shore birds in strata that appears to be very well dated to the late Triassic. The authors point out this connudrum and suggest the strata is wrongly dated. However the dating appears to be, so to speak, rock solid. What’s up with that?

    link

  35. #623312
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:04 am, chapoutier said:

    …the same thing evolved in two radically different lines..

    Not exactly. The same thing evolved from a common progenitor (with an eye a photo receptive spot from a common ancestor) because it faced similar challenges and constraints and biology can work in predictable ways when faced with challenges.

    But again, your slavish focus on these absurd “counterpoints” in the face of thousands and thousands of “points” is ridiculous.

    As is my attempting to argue with someone that believes the earth is 6,000 years old.

  36. #623318
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:08 am, right4life said:

    Not exactly. The same thing evolved from a common progenitor (with an eye a photo receptive spot from a common ancestor) because it faced similar challenges and constraints and biology can work in predictable ways when faced with challenges.

    another just-so story..yes the bearded god of evolution waved his hairy hand, and shazam it evolved…laughable.

    words just words…

    But again, your slavish focus on these absurd “counterpoints” in the face of thousands and thousands of “points” is ridiculous.

    you don’t have any points…thats the point..you have stories…no facts…

    As is my attempting to argue with someone that believes the earth is 6,000 years old.

    I actually never said that..but explain the atmosphere on titan, and how it could be maintained for all of these billions of years…

    oh and explain the

  37. #623324
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:13 am, right4life said:

    biology can work in predictable ways when faced with challenges.

    and tell me what challenges?? why evolve an eye at all?? bacteria does quite well without an eye, correct?? so what were those ‘pressures’ that caused and eye to evolve??

  38. #623342
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:25 am, cheapseat said:

    explain why the aborigines of australia bear such a striking resemblance to the indians of india, when any scientist worth the title will tell you australia separated from india millions of years ago and started it’s migration to it’s present location. the snakes didn’t morph, the people didn’t morph, and the whole damn place remained isolated for millenia.

  39. #623346
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:30 am, cheapseat said:

    but back to the original thread, how bout that religion of peace and tolerance we are bringing into this country? all our civil libertarians should recognize freedom of religion when they see it. any men facing divorce should immediately convert to islam, and cut the head off their wife, and claim sharia law. i’m sure the aclu will see this as a cause celeb and back you to the hilt.

  40. #623349
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:32 am, right4life said:

    i’m sure the aclu will see this as a cause celeb and back you to the hilt.

    the poor muslims are just victims of western christian racism and imperialism… :roll:

  41. #623412
    On February 16th, 2009 at 11:48 am, abstractmind said:

    I’ve been reading most of this thread, but i got to about post 200ish or so, and figured this single-handedly the most energy i’ve seen in a while where one guy (bluesoc) goes in circles round and round while everyone else chases him.

    I thought of about 25 points of counter-argument, but like i said..when i got farther down the postings, i saw it really wouldnt matter. I’d get some illogical dodge i’d have to re-counter all over again, and honestly…arguing with someone who you cant change their mind, and they refuse to accept a basic fact (the guy who killed this poor woman was, in fact Muslim, claimed to BE Muslim, started a Muslim Television station, and then beheaded his wife b/c she was divorcing him, as is allowed in Muslim law…dont know how much clearer that gets…) that in the end, this woman is dead. She was murdered by her estranged husband for the “crime” of trying to leave him.

    For people who are defending this retard…

    We can argue circles around one another about this until neither of us cares to continue. But i think its plain, and easy to see, that this man was motivated to kill his wife. And he did so in the tradition and by the specifically sanctioned machinations of his religion. If that isnt clear, then perhaps a list of examples should be displayed.

    http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/046614.php

    In many countries where the fundamentals of Islam are the law of the land, to behead or stone someone is, by their law and fact, the prescribed method for administering the death penalty. Should you wish to challenge that, go right ahead and waste your time. I got tired of looking at links that justified that point, and a simple google search is all thats required. The Koran lists in over 100 different places that it is acceptable to murder infidels. That doesnt count the verses where its ok to lie to them and to cheat them out of whatever you wish, because…well, they’re infidels. You can spout one bible verse, which was taken horribly out of the context…vs 100+ in the Koran. Not alot of comparison.

    Bottom line: This guy cut his wife’s head off, and did so because of his religious beliefs. You can try and lie to yourself, or someone else, and say that isnt the case, but…deep down, in places you dont talk about at your liberal parties, you know that is exactly what this man did.

    For me… i think George Carlin had it right when he said (and i’m paraphrasing) “We could outlaw religion…but we dont have time for rational decisions.

  42. #623431
    On February 16th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, garydt said:

    Chap or anyone else who blames Christians on the Spanish Inquisition must realize that most of these murders came from the Pope trying to stamp out the born again types that had risen after Martin Luther arose in protest against the catholic church. Today most of your truely born again Christians come from non-catholics or those who trust the bible over what the catholic church teaches. I am sure there are many devout Christians inside the catholic church but those who persecuted non catholics were not truely born again Christians. Jesus told us we would have to be born again to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Currently I would say the Muslims proudly say they want to control the world and will use any means possible. Yesterday on this site I asked for where are all the moderate muslims condeming the beheading that was the subject of this post. I still have no answer. Again where are all these moderates condeming?

  43. #623453
    On February 16th, 2009 at 12:15 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    This one murder did stoke the fires on this site! Now I wonder how the state will handle it-as a murder or something less due to his beliefs. Canada has treated Honor Killings less severely than other murders by muslims, Sikhs and such.

    Can we be far behind? As Muzzie Hassan has been charged with Second Degree Murder he can not receive Death or Life Without Parole.

    The death penalty was returned to the criminal statutes of New York State by Chapter 1 of the Laws of 1995, which took effect on September 1, 1995. The new law expanded the crime of murder in the first degree and provided two penalties for persons convicted of this crime: death and life in prison without the possibility of parole (LWOP).

    So I think he gets 25 to Life with possibility for parole at 15 years.

    What this have to do with Evolution/Creation is beyond me except to say the mohammedans are still in the stone age morally. They like to stone women, makes them feel manly.

  44. #623459
    On February 16th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, garydt said:

    Yes Arizona, I agree the folks got way off subject on this beheading story. It amuses me on how certain groups justify the beheading because of other groups they hate in their eyes do worse things. Liberal women would be shocked to find out that Islam does not support abortion, or at least I don’t think they do. I am not sure on how NOW would support beheadings here in the USA or not? Any feminist here would want to answer on how they like male dominated behdeadings here?

  45. #623534
    On February 16th, 2009 at 1:33 pm, granite said:

    All:Most, I should say:

    The links below lead to two excellent articles about the mortal danger that our nation/society/culture/civilization faces from the enemy combination (as David Horowitz put it, the “Unholy Alliance”) of our own domestic socialists/fascists/statists/collectivists/self-hating cowards/opposite worldview-holders, and the foreign Muslim jihadist barbarian savages.

    http://www.azure.org.il/include/print.php?id=485

    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/02/the-demise-of-the-democratic-nation-state.html

    The longer article is somewhat annoying because sentences do not start with capitals, and there are more than a few typos, omitted words, and wrong words used. But, bear with it; it is worth the read.

  46. #623616
    On February 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Misscheryl said:

    wow..just wow!!!

  47. #623642
    On February 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    Just listening to Rush Limbaugh talking about this. Apparently Muzzammil Hassan’s “Bridges TV” was a Muslim-oriented network that was created to “combat negative stereotypes of Muslims in America.” Something tells me that he sort of killed this mission of his by REMOVING his wife’s head.

    To all of you silly-nillys who question the “inherent violence in Islam,” this is the SOP of Islam. This is what a good Muslim does to follow the “Sunna” (the example of Muhammad). A good Muslim does that. He checks out the Hadith and Koran about how THE prophet would handle any situation, and then he does what Muhammad would have done it.

    Obviously, Muhammad would have decapitated Aasiya under the circumstances that Muzzammil was in, so that’s what he did. He was ONLY being a good Muslim. A back-slidden Muslim would have let her live, and would have simply divorced her. Obviously, “honor” was involved, and she couldn’t couldn’t be allowed to keep breathing anymore.

  48. #623682
    On February 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Losing Our Heads at Atlas Shrugged

  49. #623921
    On February 16th, 2009 at 6:18 pm, Flag2911 said:

    As of 2-16-2009 CNN has not put this story on their web. However, they have tried to smear Phelps at every turn. CNN, like UK, do not want to OFFEND the Muslim! Sad state of affairs.

  50. #623974
    On February 16th, 2009 at 6:51 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    On February 16th, 2009 at 3:19 pm, tamarah180 said:

    Losing Our Heads at Atlas Shrugged

    All of you silly-nillys who feel like Islam is like every other religion (and deep down, you ACTUALLY feel like it’s better than all other religions), you ought to digest this post, and read the litany of abuse and slaughter perpetrated by GOOD Muslim men who must “defend THEIR honor” by butchering the women in their lives.

    Check back with me when you’re done.

  51. #623985
    On February 16th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    It wouldn’t surprise me if Mr. Hassan asked an Imam at an Islamic website a question about his wife, and the Imam issued a fatwa that he should kill her, which included verses from the Koran and several instances in one of the Hadith that justified doing so.

  52. #624065
    On February 16th, 2009 at 8:24 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Worshiping a false moon god named allah, and following a mad man named Mohammed, is what this stoy is really about.

    ROPMA!

  53. #624168
    On February 16th, 2009 at 10:48 pm, yohannbiimu said:

    Just because Muhammad (may fire ants burrow into every inch of his body, and sting his entrails, brain, genitalia, and lungs for all eternity) decapitated people and misbehaved with a few women, and his preachers tell Muslims to follow his example, doesn’t mean that ISLAM is bad, right?

  54. #626768
    On February 19th, 2009 at 7:27 am, Silkyinfamous said:

    It is absolute insanity. I live in Buffalo and this network has been trying to get acclaim for awhile. They have tried to portray Islam in a positive light; it left the stereotype in place.

  55. #641930
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:42 pm, USpace said:

    .
    No matter how many beheadings, stonings, or terrorist attacks there are, we must never fear, resist or mock the precious and ever peaceful Islam. Who are we to say that raping 9 year-olds is immoral? Who are we to say that stoning gays and rape victims to death is evil?

    Who are we to say that killing hundreds of people every month in the name of Allah is the height of evil? That is just their culture and ideology and it MUST be respected. Morality is all relative, we must remember that.

    http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    cut off your wife’s head

    if she dishonors you
    by asking for a divorce

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe wants
    all planets Islamic

    Earth is one of many
    in process of conversion

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe wants
    many Taliban planets

    stonings and beheadings
    billions served daily

    .
    absurd thought –
    God of the Universe says
    convert the infidels

    or make them pay a tax
    if they don’t want to die
    .

You must be logged in to post a comment.

The more offensive Newsweek photo of Sarah Palin

November 17, 2009 06:54 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Friday open thread

November 6, 2009 04:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 1 Trackback

What’s on your teacher’s reading list?

November 2, 2009 05:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

90 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Happy Halloween open thread

October 31, 2009 09:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

191 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Saturday open thread

October 24, 2009 09:33 AM by Michelle Malkin

265 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

Nobel Peace Prize winner now increases tension in Louisiana

October 15, 2009 11:24 AM by Michelle Malkin

51 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Divider.

Big Nanny Alert: The War on Hamburgers

October 13, 2009 02:05 PM by Michelle Malkin

139 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Food police.


Categories: Uncategorized



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook