The barbaric Muslim beheading in Buffalo

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 14, 2009 11:22 AM

Do you think this will get as much attention from the MSM as, say, the Ted Haggard scandal or Pat Robertson’s Teletubbies remarks?

Somehow, I doubt it. (Link):

Orchard Park police are investigating a particularly gruesome killing, the beheading of a woman, after her husband — an influential member of the local Muslim community — reported her death to police Thursday.

Police identified the victim as Aasiya Z. Hassan, 37. Detectives have charged her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, 44, with second-degree murder.

“He came to the police station at 6:20 p.m. [Thursday] and told us that she was dead,” Orchard Park Police Chief Andrew Benz said late this morning.

Muzzammil Hassan told police that his wife was at his business, Bridges TV, on Thorn Avenue in the village. Officers went to that location and discovered her body.

Muzzammil Hassan is the founder and chief executive officer of Bridges TV, which he launched in 2004, amid hopes that it would help portray Muslims in a more positive light.

The killing apparently occurred some time late Thursday afternoon. Detectives still are looking for the murder weapon…

Daniel Pipes has been tracking Bridges since 2004. See this helpful timeline updated with the latest gruesome developments. Pipes notes:

1) No, this is not at all obviously about domestic violence. It is obviously about a totalitarian ideology in our midst that authorities like district attorneys refuse to open their eyes to. Phyllis Chesler establishes this point beyond a doubt in a forthcoming Middle East Quarterly article, “Are Honor Killings Simply Domestic Violence?” Spring 2009, pp. 61-69.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Uncategorized

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, twofoot said:

    Well, he’s done a bang up job of swaying me towards the religion of pieces.

  2. #102
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, bluesoc said:

    Name me one time in this country when a Christian man beheaded his wife.

    This isn’t exactly a beheading, but I think it’s on the same level.

    An evangelical preacher killed his wife several years ago and stuffed her body in a freezer after she caught him abusing their daughter

  3. #103
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, happyscrapper said:

    There are people who claim to be Christian, and who murder. They are not Christians. Although there were references in the Bible of people in history committing murder, Christians do not murder and it is not in their culture, nor are they extolled to go out and murder “infidels” for not having the same beliefs as they do. In fact, Christians are very adamant about the sanctity of life and that is why we abhor abortion or any other types of murder.

  4. #104
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:55 pm, bluesoc said:

    Christians do not murder and it is not in their culture, nor are they extolled to go out and murder “infidels” for not having the same beliefs as they do.

    That passage from exodus was all about killing people who did not believe in God.

  5. #105
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:56 pm, happyscrapper said:

    An evangelical preacher killed his wife several years ago and stuffed her body in a freezer after she caught him abusing their daughter

    Did he kill her while praising Allah? Again, while this man was a preacher, he was NOT, I repeat, NOT a Christian. Anyone can claim to be a Christian.

  6. #106
    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, bluesoc said:

    Did he kill her while praising Allah? Again, while this man was a preacher, he was NOT, I repeat, NOT a Christian. Anyone can claim to be a Christian.

    Again, please do share how you know the man who beheaded his wife was a Muslim. Can’t anybody claim to be Muslim as well?

  7. #107
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:00 pm, twofoot said:

    That passage from exodus was all about killing people who did not believe in God.

    Wow, another leftist shows absolute ignorance of the bible. Who would’ve guessed that would happen?

    /sarc

    You do realize Exodus is in the Old Testament, right?

  8. #108
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:01 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Again, please do share how you know the man who beheaded his wife was a Muslim. Can’t anybody claim to be Muslim as well?

    An influencial member of the Muslim community, followed the teaching of his religiion which teaches beheading someone as punishment. Hmmmm…sounds like a true muslum doing his Allah’s bidding. By the way, this is tiresome. I have better things to do with my day than feeding a troll.

  9. #109
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, bluesoc said:

    You do realize Exodus is in the Old Testament, right?

    You do realize the Old Testament is part of the Bible, right?

  10. #110
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:04 pm, twofoot said:

    Not to mention started his own t.v. station with the express purpose of improving the indifels view of Muslims.

    Heckuva job!

  11. #111
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, ThunderHawkk said:

    DON’T FEED LIBERAL TROLLS!

    Do you seriously think you will ever be able to get anything through their THICK HEADS?

    They’re just messing with you. You can spend 30 minutes composing a logical, reasoned response and they will come back with something based on a conversation they had with a Gore Vidal idolizer while high at Burning Man… It was all a righteous trip, man. Something like that. Why waste your time with that??

  12. #112
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, bansharia said:

    it is a deathcult.

    BAN SHARIA NOW

  13. #113
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, bluesoc said:

    You do realize the Old Testament is part of the Bible, right?

    I do, but I also understand context and that command in Exodus was for a specific time and event not for all time. Your ignorance is not all the uncommon though amongst atheists. But don’t worry, cause the actual event that does put all those “who oppose the Lord” to the sword is prophesized in Revelation upon the return of Jesus Christ.

    Your example is an apples to oranges example but I know you’ll have to deny that in your brain to continue this argument. You don’t see the Christian church advocating the beheading of those who convert away from Christianity. I can point to thousands of examples and dozens of laws amongst Muslims that make legal that very thing and push it as a policy in the open.

    Yeah, like so equal and stuff. /sarc

  14. #114
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, twofoot said:

    Yes, it is. So what? I wouldn’t expect you to understand, but it’s part of the whole “new covenant” thing. Which is why Christians are not taught to go out and slaughter anyone who disagrees with their religion. Unlike those that follow the “religion of peace”.

    Show me where Muslims have had a new covenant and you may have a leg to stand on.

  15. #115
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, twofoot said:

    You can spend 30 minutes composing a logical, reasoned response and they will come back with something based on a conversation they had with a Gore Vidal idolizer while high at Burning Man… It was all a righteous trip, man. Something like that. Why waste your time with that??

    Point taken.

  16. #116
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, bansharia said:

    Question is does this quranimal go to same mosque as the lackawanna cell did?

  17. #117
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, bluesoc said:

    Your example is an apples to oranges example but I know you’ll have to deny that in your brain to continue this argument. You don’t see the Christian church advocating the beheading of those who convert away from Christianity. I can point to thousands of examples and dozens of laws amongst Muslims that make legal that very thing and push it as a policy in the open.

    I disagree. There is a common sentiment among posters that there is something fundamentally wrong with Islam, and certain passages from the Koran are used to justify this opinion.

    There are similar passages in the Bible. At one time, Christians acted on them. (Luckily, that time has passed) Such passages, however, do not point to a fundamental flaw in Christianity (or Judaism).

    So why do certain violent passages in the Koran make Islam fundamentally flawed, but similar ones in the Bible are ok?

  18. #118
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, bluesoc said:

    I wouldn’t expect you to understand, but it’s part of the whole “new covenant” thing. Which is why Christians are not taught to go out and slaughter anyone who disagrees with their religion.

    Jews do not have a new covenant. Are those who are peaceful simply not good Jews?

  19. #119
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    I disagree. There is a common sentiment among posters that there is something fundamentally wrong with Islam, and certain passages from the Koran are used to justify this opinion.

    No, you disagree because you don’t understand the Bible and want to destroy Christianity. We don’t need to use the Koran to justify this opinion, the fact that Muslims themselves make laws saying its okay to behead people who convert out of Islam speaks volumes for itself or do you not believe that such laws exist despite the evidence to the contrary that is not just some “violent whacko sect” of Islam who make such laws?

  20. #120
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, bluesoc said:

    No, you disagree because you don’t understand the Bible and want to destroy Christianity.

    I’ve been trying to defend Islam, not destroy Christianity. I thought that was clear. If it wasn’t, I apologize.

    We don’t need to use the Koran to justify this opinion, the fact that Muslims themselves make laws saying its okay to behead people who convert out of Islam speaks volumes for itself or do you not believe that such laws exist despite the evidence to the contrary that is not just some “violent whacko sect” of Islam who make such laws?

    I have never doubted such laws exist. I think such laws are disgusting. I do not, however, think it is a fundamental part of Islam.

  21. #121
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:41 pm, jsmiddleton4 said:

    “There are similar passages in the Bible.”

    So show us what they are? Please. I mean really. Show us passages from the Bible that are similiar to those in the Koran that endorse violence against anyone considered an infidel.

    Please. Lets see them.

  22. #122
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    IIRC, Pakistan and Afghanistan have explicit laws on their books about executing apostates.

    Gotta go back about half a millenia to find anything like that in Christendom.

    Or, for Blue Socialist, Christians and Mormons opposed to gay marriage are fundamentalists in the same way al Qaeda beheading people just for not being Muslim are.

    If the Musselman in question had not chosen a favored Islamic method of killing, beheading, and had beaten his wife to death or shot her, this wouldn’t be a thread. People of all faiths (or, like BlueSoc, no faith at all) can commit domestic violence, even murder, but the beheading, well, by a man trying to sugarcoat Islam, well, that is kind of noteable.

  23. #123
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, bluesoc said:

    despite the evidence to the contrary that is not just some “violent whacko sect” of Islam who make such laws?

    I’ve yet to see such evidence.

    I know that MM tried to point to a study that showed that a majority of Muslims put their religion before their country. Apparently that was evidence enough for her.

    All it told me was that Muslims are more religious than non Muslims. I guess MM thinks that’s a bad thing.

  24. #124
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, bluesoc said:

    Or, for Blue Socialist, Christians and Mormons opposed to gay marriage are fundamentalists in the same way al Qaeda beheading people just for not being Muslim are.

    Please don’t use me as a strawman.

  25. #125
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    Any woman who is in an abusive relationship should realize that she may be killed by her husband, lover, boyfriend, etc.–regardless of religion.
    ***
    Any Muslim woman should realize that her own family (father, mother, brothers, sisters, uncles, dog washers, etc.)may kill her for wanting to have her own life. Witness the Texas Muslim father who shot his two daughters and fled our country.
    ***
    Restraining orders from police do not mean anything. Before showing any disobedience or talking back–the woman should secretly arm herself and learn how to shoot to kill.
    ***
    Then she should move out, file for divorce, etc. And she should tell the abusive husband / lover / family members that she will kill them on sight.
    ***
    God intended all men (persons) to be created equal. Sam Colt (and S & W, Ruger, and others) made it so! I suggest a 5 shot .357 revolver–it will really reform some jihadis. The wise framers of our constitution gave us the right to defend ourselves–use it!
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  26. #126
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, right4life said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, bluesoc said

    you’re clueless when it comes to islam…I find it so interesting that atheists and leftists align with muslims…I think I know why, but you wouldn’t believe it.

    islam from its start has been all about conquest…there is the house of peace (islam) and the house of war (all that is not islam) and islam will not quit, until they rule the world

    they’ve murdering christians, hindus, and everyone else, for the past 1,400 years…when are you going to get a clue?

  27. #127
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, Grayson said:

    Almost every modern ideal of justice, law, order, human rights, etc. came from Judeo-Christian beliefs, not Islam. And I say that as an Agnostic.
    Trying to make Christianity out to be just as barbaric as Islam, or whatever the hell bluesoc is doing, is nothing but vacuous moral relativism garbage.

    To take a recent example, when a woman is gang-raped in Saudi Arabia, she is imprisoned and flogged. In America, she is a victim and treated as such. There is no comparison.

  28. #128
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    I’ve yet to see such evidence.

    Lol, then you truly are ignorant. Because volumes of such laws exist and your denying their existence doesn’t make them just go away.

  29. #129
    On February 14th, 2009 at 4:59 pm, bluesoc said:

    Almost every modern ideal of justice, law, order, human rights, etc. came from Judeo-Christian beliefs, not Islam

    Are you referring to the eye for an eye form of justice that led to such things as this?

    Robert-François Damiens was tortured first with red-hot pincers; his hand, holding the knife used in the attempted assassination, was burned using sulphur; molten wax, lead, and boiling oil. Horses were then harnessed to his arms and legs for his dismemberment. Damien’s limbs and ligaments did not separate easily; after some hours, representatives of the Parlement ordered the executioner and his aides to cut Damiens’ joints. Damiens was then dismembered, to the applause of the crowd. His torso, apparently still living, was then burnt at the stake

  30. #130
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, bluesoc said:

    Lol, then you truly are ignorant. Because volumes of such laws exist and your denying their existence doesn’t make them just go away.

    Just because the laws exist does not mean the population agrees with them.

  31. #131
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, Micheleeroo said:

    His goal was to “help portray muslims in a more positive light”?

    I see darkness. Not light.

  32. #132
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, Grayson said:

    So you are using an incident of punishment for attempted regicide from the mid-1700s as an attempt to prove me wrong about modern ideals? And how is that specific to Christianity anyway? Every culture from Shinto-Buddhist Japan to Islamic Saudi Arabia had harsh punishments for attempting to harm royalty. Nowadays you can throw shoes at the President and be relatively fine.

    But whatever; your example comes from France and since it will be a Muslim country in less than 20 years I’m sure you’ll be quite pleased at how progressive things will be there then.

  33. #133
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, bansharia said:

    Rocket,
    agree had she not lived in antigun NY, she could have been armed and ready to kill this deathcultist when he showed up
    to MURDER her.
    PS. bridgetv.com is “under construction”
    HAHAHAHA

    BAN SHARIA NOW

  34. #134
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:11 pm, bansharia said:

    any NY attys here?
    Why second degree murder vs first degree?
    tree/rope/pony should do the trick ;)

  35. #135
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, PJ said:

    Ah, yes. I-Slam. I Slam anyone who disrespects me and my death cult. I Slam all infidels, be they adult or child, Jewish, Christian, Buddhist, other islamists who don’t belong to my particular cult, etc. And mohammed-the-child-molester says it’s my duty to do so.

  36. #136
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, bluesoc said:

    So you are using an incident of punishment for attempted regicide from the mid-1700s as an attempt to prove me wrong about modern ideals?

    It’s not as though, in the 20th century, we suddenly based our justice system around Judeo-Chrisitian values . Our modern justice system grew out of that.

  37. #137
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Grayson said:

    It’s not as though, in the 20th century, we suddenly based our justice system around Judeo-Chrisitian values . Our modern justice system grew out of that.

    Yeah, thanks for clearing that up for me. It’s not as though that wasn’t part of my original point or anything.

    I tell you what though; I’ve got a fun test for you to prove how right you are about Islam and Christianity being so alike.
    First, be seen in public in America with a Qu’ran. Now try and do the same with a Bible in Saudi Arabia. Let me know how that works out for you.

  38. #138
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Now try and do the same with a Bible in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Egypt, Pakistan, most of Indonesia…

    The list is much longer of places where you can be killed or jailed for doing so. Just helping out ;)

  39. #139
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, bluesoc said:

    Yeah, thanks for clearing that up for me. It’s not as though that wasn’t part of my original point or anything.

    I might not have been very clear. I meant to say that our justice system developed out of the eye for an eye principle that allowed for Damiens’ torture. We’ve obviously overcome such brutality, but at one point (not very long ago) it was thought to be consistent with Judeo Christian morality and justice.

    First, be seen in public in America with a Qu’ran. Now try and do the same with a Bible in Saudi Arabia. Let me know how that works out for you.

    To be honest, I think your example says more about the dangers of state sanctioned religion than it does about Islam being bad.

  40. #140
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:30 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    To be honest, I think your example says more about the dangers of state sanctioned religion than it does about Islam being bad.

    :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    Israel is a Jewish state. Yeah, your’e just a little bit stupid today… Next!

  41. #141
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    you’re*

  42. #142
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, frontierguy said:

    I see liberals in here trying desperately to make a moral equivalent between Christians and Muslims. This is becoming droll and don’t you liberals ever get tired of kissing a$$? Don’t your lips get chapped after a while?

    Also, the a$$ kisser who brought up Bosnia. Many of the reported “atrocities” committed by the Serbs were in fact debunked. Since we are playing moral equivalence, the Muslim Albanians enjoyed a game of burning down churches and blazing homes of the Christian elderly after your hero Bill Clinton ordered troops in there under the umbrella of the U.N. Troops who blockaded villages and towns so the the Serb forces could not get in to protect Serb Bosnians. One of the guys in my unit who was there watching Serb forces angry and pleading to let them into a village to stop the Muslim onslaught thought they were being melodramatic. That is until our unit went down into the village, he left saying…I knew then that the Albanians must be some of the worst people on the planet.

    You just keep on bringing up things that happened thousands of years ago to justify your liberal “feelings”. Smoochy, smooch, that a$$ sure does taste good, doesn’t it? Or is it that warm feeling you get deep inside telling you, your better than everyone else.

  43. #143
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, Grayson said:

    To be honest, I think your example says more about the dangers of state sanctioned religion than it does about Islam being bad.

    If you want to take it that way fine, but there’s a reason there is no longer such a thing as a country with Christianity as the state-sanctioned religion. Islam on the other hand isn’t too keen on the whole “freedom of religion” thing.

  44. #144
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, bluesoc said:

    Just because the laws exist does not mean the population agrees with them

    Correct – take the stimulus package for example.

  45. #145
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    bluesoc wrote:

    This isn’t exactly a beheading, but I think it’s on the same level.

    An evangelical preacher killed his wife several years ago and stuffed her body in a freezer after she caught him abusing their daughter

    Nice try.

    If the preacher had stoned his wife to death because she committed adultery, your parallel would be vaguely applicable (moreso if they were radical Jews), but he didn’t. That sort of murder is not unique to Christians, whereas beheading is a favorite method of Muslims.

    It would have been easier for Hassan to just stab her to death or shoot her, but he (allegedly) cut her head off. You don’t think there’s a reason he did things the hard way?

  46. #146
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, Chief RZ said:

    The Religion of Love?

  47. #147
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, bluesoc said:

    If the preacher had stoned his wife to death because she committed adultery, your parallel would be vaguely applicable (moreso if they were radical Jews), but he didn’t. That sort of murder is not unique to Christians, whereas beheading is a favorite method of Muslims.

    It would have been easier for Hassan to just stab her to death or shoot her, but he (allegedly) cut her head off. You don’t think there’s a reason he did things the hard way?

    Christian men kill their wives for adultery all the time. In fact, until very recently, many states considered murder for adultery to only be a 2nd degree offense.

    Are you arguing that those who behead are more culpable than those who shoot or stab their wives?

  48. #148
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, rooster said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, frontierguy said:
    I see liberals in here trying desperately to make a moral equivalent between Christians and Muslims.

    Amen frontierguy! This once great nation is doomed because of the liberals constant lies about actual history. With print news, tv news and Hollyweird rewriting history falsely, how are we going to survive as a nation?

  49. #149
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:48 pm, right4life said:

    Christian men kill their wives for adultery all the time. In fact, until very recently, many states considered murder for adultery to only be a 2nd degree offense.

    really?? why don’t you post the stats…bet ya can’t, you’re a liar.

  50. #150
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:51 pm, bluesoc said:

    really?? why don’t you post the stats…bet ya can’t, you’re a liar.

    Which part? The statutes or the murders?

  51. #151
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:53 pm, right4life said:

    both…why ask?

  52. #152
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    really?? why don’t you post the stats…bet ya can’t, you’re a liar.

    And dodges stats that totally contradicts his “Muslim’s don’t behead people because of Islam defense”. Can we drop him off in (____ insert Muslim country here) with a “I love America shirt” on and Bible in hand? Please, pretty please? I want to see his good buddies response and see how much the peace and love preached by the Koran factors into their treatment of him. Any bets he ends up the next televised beheading on Al-Jazeera TV?

  53. #153
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:57 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Since, his wife came up with the idea of this cable channel; I’m guessing he did not support the channels aims as well as she did.

  54. #154
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, right4life said:

    Can we drop him off in (____ insert Muslim country here) with a “I love America shirt” on and Bible in hand?

    yeah the libs find common cause with the muslims against christianity…in contradiction to everything the liberals say they believe….because they serve the same dark master…and neither of them know it…yet.

  55. #155
    On February 14th, 2009 at 5:58 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    bluesoc you are so stupid you make the crackhead YOU elected in D.C. look smart.

    I would like to see where you are getting your information from. Just because you are hearing Whoopi Goldberg on the View say it does not mean it is true.
    bluesoc, you are a little ignorant troll whom is a sheep being lead to slaughter by the people you are following. I for one am waiting for the day the revolution to take back our country begins.

    BRING ON THE CIVIL WAR !!! TIME TO GET RID OF THE STUPID PEOPLE.

  56. #156
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, bluesoc said:

    Until 1997, Maryland allowed one to mitigate murder to manslaughter on the discovery of adultery. They had to change the law to say:

    “the discovery of one’s spouse engaged in sexual activity or sexual intercourse with another person does not constitute legally adequate provocation for the purpose of mitigating a killing of the spouse from the crime of murder to voluntary manslaughter”

  57. #157
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:01 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Dip, dodge, weave and duck! Look at that troll go!

  58. #158
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, lgm said:

    right4life said (#153):

    yeah the libs …(blabla)….because they serve the same dark master…

    It’s true, you cannot imagine the power of the dark side of the Force.

  59. #159
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:04 pm, right4life said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, bluesoc said:
    Until 1997, Maryland allowed one to mitigate murder to manslaughter on the discovery of adultery. They had to change the law to say:

    maryland!! that good liberal state…how interesting…you didn’t post a link…well you know those good libs are always excusing crimes aren’t they? those poor criminals are just ‘victims’ aren’t they?

  60. #160
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:04 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, bluesoc said:

    I just posted a comment with a few links to Christian murders.

    Tell me you’re kidding

    Tell me you’re drunk

    Tell me your philosophical idol is lgm.

    How you can compare random murder with barbaric Islamist sanctioned Honor Killings is beyond belief. To say that chopping someone’s head off is not Islamic is a clear sign of ignorance. Beheading infidels is sanctioned by Islamic Sharia laws, as is slaughtering your wife or daughter when your pride is wounded.

    Of course you throw old testament law out and claim that Christians should follow it – which further proves your ignorance. The Old Testament is a history lesson for Christians so they can understand where their beliefs come from.

    You completely ignore what happened in history (your ignorance of which comes when you claim that US law is based on Judeo-Christian law, it’s not, it’s based on British Common law) If we were to follow your sorry, pitiful logic Obama would be owned by a Democrat plantation owner and be working a cotton field because slavery used to be legal.

    Please feel free to explore the rest of the internet. Now. Go.

  61. #161
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:05 pm, right4life said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, lgm said:
    right4life said (#153):

    you have no idea how very real and very frightening the darkness is…oh but you will someday!

  62. #162
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, bluesoc said:

    In Massachusetts “observing one’s spouse in the act of adultery or hearing such acts may constitute legally sufficient provocation” to mitigate a murder charge to manslaughter.

  63. #163
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, CWinNY said:

    Bluesoc,

    You can cite thousands of examples of Christians, Jews, Buddhists, and people of other religions behaving badly. There will always be an example of someone killing someone else – regardless of religion. The difference here is that only one (major) religion today sanctions the brutal murder of people of other religions. Only one religion today sanctions the oppression of half of its population (women).

    Beheading someone may not be a particularly nasty way of killing someone – if you use a large sharp knife and one clean blow. However, anything less than that would be a nasty way to kill someone.

  64. #164
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    Still dodging…

  65. #165
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:08 pm, lgm said:

    right4life said (#160):

    you have no idea how very real and very frightening the darkness is

    There’s good in you. I can feel it!

  66. #166
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:09 pm, right4life said:

    In Massachusetts “observing one’s spouse in the act of adultery or hearing such acts may constitute legally sufficient provocation” to mitigate a murder charge to manslaughter.

    another good liberal state…oh this is too funny! you pick the states that have strayed the farthest from a judeo-christian concept of justice and law…states that are famous for excusing crime…do you remember the 60s and 70s?? criminals were just ‘victims’ of vast socio-economic forces…and were to be rehabilitated instead of punished???

  67. #167
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, bluesoc said:

    Of course you throw old testament law out and claim that Christians should follow it – which further proves your ignorance. The Old Testament is a history lesson for Christians so they can understand where their beliefs come from.

    What about Jews? They follow the Old Testament.

    You completely ignore what happened in history (your ignorance of which comes when you claim that US law is based on Judeo-Christian law, it’s not, it’s based on British Common law) If we were to follow your sorry, pitiful logic Obama would be owned by a Democrat plantation owner and be working a cotton field because slavery used to be legal.

    where do you think common law came from?

  68. #168
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, right4life said:

    There’s good in you. I can feel it!

    funny, I’m not feeling it from you! :P

  69. #169
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, right4life said:

    What about Jews? They follow the Old Testament.

    where do they do the animal sacrifices at???

  70. #170
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    funny, I’m not feeling it from you! :P

    /drum roll
    /cymbal

  71. #171
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, bluesoc said:

    another good liberal state…oh this is too funny! you pick the states that have strayed the farthest from a judeo-christian concept of justice and law…states that are famous for excusing crime…do you remember the 60s and 70s?? criminals were just ‘victims’ of vast socio-economic forces…and were to be rehabilitated instead of punished???

    Ummm, I’m not sure Mass. was uber liberal when they started recognizing this defense. Call it a hunch.

  72. #172
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, bluesoc said:

    where do they do the animal sacrifices at???

    That was exactly my point when I brought up the Old Testament.

    Even if something is in a sacred text, it does not mean that members of that religion MUST follow it.

  73. #173
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, right4life said:

    Ummm, I’m not sure Mass. was uber liberal when they started recognizing this defense. Call it a hunch.

    they’ve been uber liberal for a long long time…its like chicago…name the last republican mayor…been a while, same for detroit…crime is rampant…schools failing…in detroit, civilization is crumbling…ever wonder why?

    you need to do a little more reading of history….

  74. #174
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, sbw999 said:

    Blue soc: Im glad you are posting because you illustrate so clearly the puddle deep intellect of the average run of the mill liberal. To a liberal a butterfly and a jet are quite similar, because they both have wings. Something about the liberal mind makes you unable to make logical comparisons, or connections. But you’ll insist that you’re right with child like persistence. Liberals are masters of the non sequitur. If ignorance is bliss, you are indeed a happy little liberal.

  75. #175
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:15 pm, right4life said:

    Even if something is in a sacred text, it does not mean that members of that religion MUST follow it.

    yeah but the muslims are pretty devout, and they follow the koran very closely…sharia law…and where are all the muslim protests of the suicide bombers?? you won’t find any.

  76. #176
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, bluesoc said:

    they’ve been uber liberal for a long long time…its like chicago…name the last republican mayor…been a while, same for detroit…crime is rampant…schools failing…in detroit, civilization is crumbling…ever wonder why?

    you need to do a little more reading of history….

    I’m still gonna stick by my hunch. Generally, these adultery laws are very (hundreds of years) old.

  77. #177
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, bluesoc said:

    yeah but the muslims are pretty devout, and they follow the koran very closely…sharia law…and where are all the muslim protests of the suicide bombers?? you won’t find any.

    So if you don’t protest something, it means you endorse it? I’m not sure I’d agree with that.

  78. #178
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    I appoligize to all texans for this…..

    sarc on/

    In Texas you are allowed to committ murder if you beleive that the person you are killing would be better off. Or atleast that is what Whoopi says on the View. LOL

    sarc off/

    For you information bluesoc the law in Miss. said that until 1996 you could still own a slave. Show me one case where this was used successfully since 1900 to allow the servitude of blacks ???

  79. #179
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, bluesoc said:

    Blue soc: Im glad you are posting because you illustrate so clearly the puddle deep intellect of the average run of the mill liberal. To a liberal a butterfly and a jet are quite similar, because they both have wings. Something about the liberal mind makes you unable to make logical comparisons, or connections. But you’ll insist that you’re right with child like persistence. Liberals are masters of the non sequitur. If ignorance is bliss, you are indeed a happy little liberal.

    Thanks for the analysis.

  80. #180
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:18 pm, frontierguy said:

    In Massachusetts “observing one’s spouse in the act of adultery or hearing such acts may constitute legally sufficient provocation” to mitigate a murder charge to manslaughter.

    Bluesoc, does that only apply to men? Just curious.

    I think you know where I am going here. So in the interest of brevity, go ahead and justify my argument through some equivalence.

  81. #181
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, bluesoc said:

    For you information bluesoc the law in Miss. said that until 1996 you could still own a slave. Show me one case where this was used successfully since 1900 to allow the servitude of blacks

    That’s a bad example. The 13th amendment abolished slavery. The Supremacy clause trumps state law.

  82. #182
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, Virginia Patriot said:

    Another shining example of the religion of pieces……………

  83. #183
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, right4life said:

    I’m still gonna stick by my hunch. Generally, these adultery laws are very (hundreds of years) old.

    no surprise there…truth, logic, history, and facts are wasted upon liberals..

  84. #184
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, lgm said:

    bluesoc said (#166):

    What about Jews? They follow the Old Testament.

    Death for adultery has not been practiced since Rabbi Akiva (about 200AD?).

    Otherwise I’m with you all the way. How can these nuts pretend that only Muslims do bad things?

  85. #185
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, frontierguy said:

    Ooops, justify your argument.

  86. #186
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    and where are all the muslim protests of the suicide bombers?? you won’t find any.

    Indeed. But you will find 70,000 student volunteers in Iran who want to blow themselves up to kill Israelis :P

  87. #187
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, right4life said:

    So if you don’t protest something, it means you endorse it? I’m not sure I’d agree with that.

    really? christians protested slavery…christian abolition societies….name a muslim abolition society, or a atheist one…you cannot..ever hear of WILBERFORCE??

    please the muslims danced in the street on 9/11…

  88. #188
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:22 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, bluesoc said:
    For you information bluesoc the law in Miss. said that until 1996 you could still own a slave. Show me one case where this was used successfully since 1900 to allow the servitude of blacks
    That’s a bad example. The 13th amendment abolished slavery. The Supremacy clause trumps state law.

    HOW IS IT A BAD EXAMPLE ??? Is it cause you are unable to answer ?? I think it is a great example. Just because it slapped you logic down does not make it a bad example.

  89. #189
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:22 pm, right4life said:

    Otherwise I’m with you all the way. How can these nuts pretend that only Muslims do bad things?

    another nice liberal lie.

    people of all types do bad things…but violence is part of islam…and your denials are idiotic and laughable.

  90. #190
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:23 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    please the muslims danced in the street on 9/11…

    Including Muslims in this country. I kept news articles because it astounded me when it happened and knew one day some liberal nutjob like lgm or bluesoc would deny it ever happened.

  91. #191
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:23 pm, sbw999 said:

    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, bluesoc said:

    Thanks for the analysis.

    Quite welcome. Always happy to help.

  92. #192
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:24 pm, bluesoc said:

    really? christians protested slavery…christian abolition societies….name a muslim abolition society, or a atheist one…you cannot..ever hear of WILBERFORCE??

    Muslims Against Sharia

  93. #193
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:25 pm, av8tr said:

    PS soc – You’re a fool.

    How can you possibly make such a sweeping remark? Surely you’re just trying to stir up the puddin’ here. No one, with your intellect, would actually say something so stunningly stupid. I get it now – your comments are meant to be funny, right?

  94. #194
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:26 pm, bluesoc said:

    HOW IS IT A BAD EXAMPLE ??? Is it cause you are unable to answer ?? I think it is a great example. Just because it slapped you logic down does not make it a bad example.

    I think you were trying to argue that even though there are certain laws, they aren’t always enforced. Is that correct?

    If so, you choose a bad law. The reason it’s not enforced is because IT’S ILLEGAL!!! The adultery laws are not illegal.

  95. #195
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:26 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    lgm drooled:

    … I’m with you [bluesoc] all the way. How can these nuts pretend that only Muslims do bad things?

    You’re an idiot.

  96. #196
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:26 pm, bluesoc said:

    How can you possibly make such a sweeping remark? Surely you’re just trying to stir up the puddin’ here. No one, with your intellect, would actually say something so stunningly stupid. I get it now – your comments are meant to be funny, right?

    What comment are you referring to?

  97. #197
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, lgm said:

    alaskangrizzly said (#189):

    please the muslims danced in the street on 9/11…

    Including Muslims in this country.

    Correction: there were Muslims in the US who celebrated 9/11. Also there were Christians in the US who celebrated Christian massacres of Bosnians not long ago.

  98. #198
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    While this story is covered by the local area news. On the national news I am not seeing much. What a surprise.

  99. #199
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, GaMidnightRider said:

    bluesoc, i thought you where an attorney or something who thinks it is. For you information the law in Miss. was used in many cases up until 1996 to help blacks in the purchase land and and whites also who did not have money to do so. It was called share cropping.
    It was only after the NAACP got involved and forced the law to be changed that it was removed from the books. Since then land ownership has declined by blacks and poor whites within the state of Miss. 54 percent.

  100. #200
    On February 14th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, alaskangrizzly said:

    The adultery laws are not illegal.

    While no one should ever murder another human being for any reason and any husband or wife who does so deserves to rot in prison… to equate slavery to adultery is another ludicrous example by nuts like you. Adultery is a crime. Thanks to ilk like you it may not be a criminal offense in the eyes of the law anymore it is still the same moral offense that leaves families scarred and lives ruined and is why God Himself made it clear in the 10 Commandments by putting it right in there. And Jesus upped the ante by pointing out that lust is adultery of the heart.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


A bittersweet moment for Discovery

April 17, 2012 10:29 AM by Michelle Malkin

138 Comments

Christ the Lord is risen today

April 8, 2012 10:53 AM by Michelle Malkin

99 Comments

First Day of 2012 Open Thread & Aspirin-Swapping Roundtable

January 1, 2012 11:45 AM by Doug Powers

235 Comments

Happy new year!

Reports: Miners trapped in Mullan, Idaho; 6 hospitalized

December 15, 2011 01:34 AM by Michelle Malkin

23 Comments

Pinheads at Penn State

November 10, 2011 02:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

186 Comments

10 years ago: My generation’s bloody wake-up call

September 10, 2011 10:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments

Hurricane/Tropical Storm Irene Open Thread

August 28, 2011 12:25 PM by Doug Powers

104 Comments


Categories: Uncategorized

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook