See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:44 am, bilgerat said:

   Hey, if the turban fits….

2. #2
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:49 am, JConrad999 said:

   Where’s the problem?

3. #3
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:49 am, MtsEdge said:

   Just goes to show ya it’s easy for ANYONE to make that mistake!

4. #4
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:54 am, TooMuchTime said:

   Probably what happened was that someone entered Obama into their spell checker and when they typed o-s-a-m-a it auto-corrected to Obama.

   Then the moron forgot to reread what he typed. Or maybe he did!

5. #5
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:54 am, nail49 said:

   You say Obama, I say Osama, let’s call the whole thing off!

   I WISH!!!!

6. #6
   On February 18th, 2009 at 10:57 am, backwoods conservative said:

   A geographer uses innovative analysis to narrow Obama bin Laden’s location to three sites.

   Better get him before he flies off in Air Force One again.

7. #7
   On February 18th, 2009 at 11:01 am, MtsEdge said:

   Better get him before he flies off in Air Force One again.

   

8. #8
   On February 18th, 2009 at 11:09 am, Paul Revere said:

   Obama bin Nazi. There, DKos…link it…I dare ya.

9. #9
   On February 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am, SilverCat said:

   As usual, BHO handled the gaffe with class and confident humor. It must drive the right crazy knowing the Republicans do not have anyone near BHO’s level of intelligence and that 2016 is a long long way away.

10. #10
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:11 am, Flyoverman said:

    It still pale’s in comparision to the Ted Kennedy, “Osama, Obama” clip. That one is for the ages. A true classic.

11. #11
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:18 am, brad_sk said:

    But since it wasn’t the fault of Fox News or a Republican, you’ll barely hear a peep about it.

    True…may be just like we won’t hear about Palin’s tax problems here…Link

12. #12
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am, b-cat said:

    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am, SilverCat said:
    As usual, BHO handled the gaffe with class and confident humor. It must drive the right crazy knowing the Republicans do not have anyone near BHO’s level of intelligence and that 2016 is a long long way away.

    If you are going to claim superior intelligence, learn to punctuate.

13. #13
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:23 am, MtsEdge said:

    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:18 am, brad_sk said:

    “Last fall we raised questions about longstanding practices within the Department of Administration regarding tax treatment of per diem payments,” Kreitzer wrote in an exchange of e-mails over the past few days with the Daily News.

    “At the Governor’s request, we reviewed the situation to determine whether we were in full compliance with the pertinent Internal Revenue Service regulations,” Kreitzer wrote. “As a result of this review, we determined that per diem needs to be treated as income, requiring a revision of W-2 forms for any affected employees.”

    So your point is that all Alaska State employees receiving per diem were informed by the administration (wrongly, perhaps) that it was tax-free, then Governor Palin requested a review which has now changed the determination, affecting her and all others in a similar situation? Thanks for showing this the light of day!!

14. #14
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:26 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    The first sentence in the article…

    It’s not just angry rightwingers who mix up “Obama” and “Osama.”

    Really? Angry rightwingers? Nah…this isn’t biased, right?

    Yahoo, AP and CNN were there first.

    Unbelievable.

15. #15
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:32 am, DBNinKY said:

    True…may be just like we won’t hear about Palin’s tax problems here… .

    Well gee, Brad_SK, what’s the deal? It’s not like Plain’s the Secretary of the Treasury or something, able to control and direct the financial future of the country…she’s only a governor.

    I mean, imagine if Obama had nominated a T-Sec who had not paid his taxes…oh wait…never mind!

16. #16
    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    True…may be just like we won’t hear about Palin’s tax problems here

    Interesting. If you actually READ the article, this isn’t about Palin’s tax problems. It’s about a bunch of other Alaskan officials — lots of Dems here too. Looks like they had to clarify what’s tax free and what’s not. It’s not as if Palin was deliberately evading taxes.

    This is not like Geithner who was REIMBURSED for taxes, never paid them, and only paid them when he was caught after he was nominated (laughably) for the job of Treasury Secretary (where DID I put that Tax Cheat stamp!).

    Nice try…

17. #17
    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:03 pm, brad_sk said:

    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:32 am, DBNinKY said: at 15

    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am, BlameAmericaLast said: at 16

    When did I say Obama’s appointees or all his actions were right…? The point here is about what kind of news are hyped or ignored in what kind of sites. This is a republican blog (not necessarily a complete conservative) and so Palin’s goofs are ignored here…Similarly libtard sites only make a fuss when a republican screws up Obama/Osama.

    Your argument is more like some Huffpo’s…”Don’t look at my problems…They have bigger problems”

18. #18
    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On February 18th, 2009 at 11:53 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    My point exactly. Based on brad-sk’s response #17, it appears that he/she hasn’t read the article either!!

19. #19
    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, DBNinKY said:

    …Palin’s goofs… .

    a.) I’m not convinced she made any goofs; what she did seems reasonable and legal.

    b.) Geithner is the one who deserves your censure – he’s our nation’s T-Sec and in charge of the recovery!

    How can the public even begin to have confidence in the markets and the economy, when the man in charge, the man who has a direct effect on all our finances, cannot be trusted to pay his own taxes and displays the height of irresponsibility by pushing the blame off on computer software?

20. #20
    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, nbarry said:

    And to think that the only difference between our president and the honcho of Al Qaeda is one measly consonant.

21. #21
    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:50 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    brad_sk: Your argument just doesn’t stand up under scrutiny. RARELY are democrats identified as democrats when they are caught doing all kinds of despicable things. And, even when the press does get around to mentioning it, it is blown off as “they mispoke” or “they’re sorry” so that makes it all better. It is a very rare thing when democrats are EVER viewed unkindly by the vast majority of newspapers, TV, etc. Try re-reading the article you linked which indicates to me those involved did not intentionally rip off the taxpayer–so, don’t blow your liberal defending smoke at me.

22. #22
    On February 18th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, corona said:

    It’s time to crack down on the trolls – here, especially those obsessed with the governor of Alaska – probably because they could never get a date with a woman of her class.

    Ban them – now.

23. #23
    On February 18th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, Joy said:

    Or… maybe IGNORE THEM.

    Just sayin’.

24. #24
    On February 18th, 2009 at 7:28 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Science takes on terror hunt
    A geographer uses innovative analysis to narrow Obama bin Laden’s location to three sites.

    President Obama bin Laden does terrorize me at times, such as when he is talking, so for one I am glad Science is tracking him.

    Wasn’t it Splash Kennedy (D) Mass. who referred to the man as Osama? Why I do believe it was Flyoverman .

25. #25
    On February 18th, 2009 at 7:36 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    I saw an “Obama, Biden” bumper sticker this weekend that, at first glance, I honestly thought read “Obama Bin Laden”.

26. #26
    On February 18th, 2009 at 7:49 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On February 18th, 2009 at 12:03 pm, brad_sk said:

    …This is a republican blog (not necessarily a complete conservative)…

    I beg to differ. Michelle’s About page says nothing about this being a Republican blog. She’s put up plenty of posts against Republicans who side with the libtards. Also, Michelle permits pro-tyranny, God-hating, pustules-of-putridity (like lgm) to post here. If Michelle was a Republican shill, these libcrappers would be gone pretty quick.

27. #27
    On February 18th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    brad_sk said
    …This is a republican blog

    Go easy on the lad there JetJ. He has been drinking the Kiio Aid so long his brain is water logged.

    You are correct that the libtards are useless, but they are fun to watch

28. #28
    On March 28th, 2009 at 8:19 pm, Dimsdale said:

    I prefer Obama bin Biden myself…