Comments on: Questions & answers and more questions about O’s massive mortgage entitlement

By: DannoJyd

DannoJyd — Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:47:29 +0000

Will illegal aliens be eligible for the program?

This question earns Michelle my support.

My question is, When will the persons responsible for the ‘toxic assetts’ be held accountable?

DaBamanomics sucks.

By: links for 2009-02-19 « Brain Music –Gadgets, Neuroscience, Music, Social Media, Health 2.0 & More

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:04:20 +0000

[...] Michelle Malkin » Questions & answers and more questions about O’s massive mortgage entitleme… (tags: obama) [...]

By: corona

corona — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:09:59 +0000

a concise explanation of the boondoggle

By: Obama signs $787 billion pork bill BUT asks us to live “within” our means…

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:17:27 +0000

[...] here’s an excerpt from Comrade Obnama’s speech on the socialist approach to [...]

By: Random-American » Mortgage Bailout Boondoggle

Random-American » Mortgage Bailout Boondoggle — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:07:11 +0000

[...] On top of the eleventy-gajillion dollars being spent on the stimulus spendulus package, compliments of the US taxpayers, President Obama has now released details of a $75 billion bailout plan for folks not paying their mortgages. (hat tip:MM) [...]

By: The News Factor: News, opinion, current events — a rewarding news experience » Blog Archive » Michelle Malkin has the ANSWERS … but mainly QUESTIONS about the mortgage mess

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:35:17 +0000

[...] Questions & answers and more questions about O’s massive mortgage entitlement [...]

By: Obama’s Dilemma, How Can He Top Himself? « Riggword Weblog

Obama’s Dilemma, How Can He Top Himself? « Riggword Weblog — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:23:15 +0000

[...] Obama is no different than other ambitious immortality seekers; he needs to be constantly filled with praise for his accomplishments. Obama needs to find more ways to prove his worth as the President of the United States. In his first month in office he has enacted the The new $825 Billion Stimulus package that will cost well over $1 Trillion if just 2 years of interest is added onto it and now the $75 Billion Homeowner Stability Initiative to Reach Up to 3 to 4 Million At-Risk Homeowners. [...]

By: Random-American

Random-American — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:06:49 +0000

I’ll soon be sporting this on my bumper…

http://www.cafepress.com/mortgageproblem.359457968

By: Republicanvet

Republicanvet — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:42:35 +0000

Refinancing for Up to 4 to 5 Million Responsible Homeowners to Make Their Mortgages More Affordable

Good luck with finding that many.

If they were responsible in the first place, they would have found a place and a mortgage they could afford.

By: Mainah

Mainah — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:59:00 +0000

http://www.resistnet.com

By: Pat

Pat — Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:10:24 +0000

Why do Republicans continue to believe, as Democrats do, that the number one goal of economic policy should be to prop up housing prices?

Because it keeps property taxes rolling in to their crooked friends in the states. And because if all the homeowners that we financed 100% walk away from their Fannie/Freddie loans, the govt will be liable for much more than they could possibly raise because of their foolish loan guarantees for anything and everything. They don’t give a hoot about the taxpayers or the homeowners, just their own butts in a sling.

By: katablog

katablog — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:25:05 +0000

Wren #45: The bank can wait for you to make a deposit so it can make a loan and all the time worry that at any time you may demand your deposit back; OR, the bank can take FREE bailout money from the Government and make a few loans all the while bleeding the government for more money to make more loans.

Now ask yourselves – which is more profitable especially in the short term.

By: Texas T

Texas T — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:28:02 +0000

thank you Mainah. Looks like good stuff

By: wren

wren — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:00:29 +0000

To: katablog #44

The banks use our deposits to make loans.

If the banks don’t have deposits, they go out of business.

By: katablog

katablog — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:55:18 +0000

Now wait a minute. Why would a bank want your deposit – which presumably they have to give back when you want it when the alternative is to get your money handed to them which they don’t have to give back?