See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #1
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:50 am, chapoutier said:

   Oh, and did she mention how “warm” they are?

   Was it them or the thermostat?

2. #2
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:50 am, Cosmo said:

   Smoking is the new healthy. So’s a nicotine patch! Woo hoo! He has such self-control.

3. #3
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:51 am, Cosmo said:

   chap: that’s funny.

4. #4
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:51 am, reaganite said:

   Jennifer Loven can’t be happy.

5. #5
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:55 am, JDinTX said:

   He speaks so slowly, not for the media, but he can’t think of what he is supposed to be saying. He is afraid he will pull a Joe Biden.

6. #6
   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:58 am, shooter said:

   drool buckets. Kathleen Parker took hers home for a souvenir.

   I think Kathleen Parker IS a drool bucket.

7. #7
   On February 19th, 2009 at 11:01 am, pianoman said:

   God, I just read the whole thing. I mean, admiration is one thing, but home girl has gone over the cliff. Gag me.

8. #8
   On February 19th, 2009 at 11:03 am, RedDog said:

   On February 19th, 2009 at 10:50 am, Cosmo said:
   Smoking is the new healthy.

   So that’s where he got his mellifluously creamy baritone. So very sexxxy. So Brokaw. Too bad it’s powered by arcane 19th century marxist thought.

9. #9
   On February 19th, 2009 at 11:04 am, DBNinKY said:

   He speaks so slowly, not for the media… .

   Am I the only one, or do any of you find Obama’s fast-then-slow speech pattern too distracting to attend to what is being said?

   It’s like he’s using his manner of speech to model that old rhyme “Once you shake the catchup bottle, first none will come but then a lot’ll.”

10. #10
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:09 am, regularguy said:

    How in the heck can this woman earn a living with this tripe?

11. #11
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:10 am, Jaded said:

    He speaks so slowly because LIARS have to take the time to think up the next lie and or keep the one they are saying on track.

    Kathleen Parker is a FOOL among FOOLS!

12. #12
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:10 am, Paul Revere said:

    Can’t wait until all the White women reporterettes get accused of having a “mandingo fantasy” re: Barry Obama.

13. #13
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:12 am, kwyoung said:

    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:04 am, DBNinKY said:
    He speaks so slowly, not for the media… .
    Am I the only one, or do any of you find Obama’s fast-then-slow speech pattern too distracting to attend to what is being said?

    Must be the teleprompter is malfunctioning again.

14. #14
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:13 am, olsantaroy said:

    Kathleen was once one of my favorite columnists, until she went anti-Palin during the campaign. Now my ardor has definitely cooled.

15. #15
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:14 am, simcoe said:

    This had somewhat the feel of an extra-polite diplomatic meeting as the adult Obamas totaled 15 handshakes. I half-expected us to fold our hands and begin bowing.

    Sweetie, I just read your story and that’s exactly what you did do. Now stand up and wipe off your chin. Act like an adult. Here, would you like a cigarette?

16. #16
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:19 am, shooter said:

    Obama’s fast-then-slow speech pattern too distracting to attend to what is being said?

    It’s a classic pattern of deceit. It’s pathological.
    He has so many blatant lies and promises out there that he has definite trouble remembering what he’s already ‘embellished’.

17. #17
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:22 am, corona said:

    Sorry, but this is a silly post. The woman has obviously lost it. She needs psychiatric help. Publicizing her rants is useless.

18. #18
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:22 am, thirteen28 said:

    You know she’s successfully completed her transformation to a liberal now, as it’s bloody obvious she has no capacity for embarrassment at this point.

    Gag me with a school bus.

19. #19
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:22 am, tarpon said:

    How would a Democrat recognize Hitler — They would vote for him.

20. #20
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:27 am, faraway said:

    ObamaGasm to Paper

21. #21
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:27 am, happyscrapper said:

    One of the commenters regarding that article said this: “I loved your quote about the “little buddha inside Omama”, it’s really weird but when I see him I feel calmer and more hopeful and more reassured. I am also inspired to get up everyday and be more positive and energized to get my work done…when I am feeling a bit down and not motivated, I think about what he has accomplished and I am reenergized. Its really amazing…he’s got something magical working. In all of my 56 yrs, I have NEVER felt this inspired by anyone..when he visited Chicago this weekend and there was not a lot of press about him, I missed seeing him. He is the presence we need in these turbulent times. Sometimes I think maybe its a lot of pressure and burden to put on this young man, but somehow I know he can handle it!!!” You may now continue your puking.

22. #22
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:31 am, Jarhead said:

    I suspect that if you cut Obama open, you’d find a little Buddha sitting inside, smiling.

    I Ms.Paker suspect one would fine a little Saul Alinsky holding a signed copy of Rules for Radicals.

23. #23
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:31 am, TXGator said:

    ‘A little Buddha inside?’
    Holy crap.
    I think this woman has secured her next Air Force I flight.
    A la the octuplet mom, Kathleen will probably start getting plastic surgery to look like Michelle. They’ll have to find a bulldog’s jaw for the initial transplant, but it can be done.

24. #24
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:31 am, cheapseat said:

    good one chap. they ought to be warm.

25. #25
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:33 am, jsr said:

    I suspect that if you cut Obama open, you’d find a little Buddha sitting inside, smiling.

    That was as far as I could get before I started wretching. When I recovered it occured to me I would expect to see a hamster running on a wheel.

26. #26
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:35 am, chapoutier said:

    I suspect that if you cut Obama open,…

    Riffing off the other thread, I wonder if this will earn Ms. Parker a visit from Secret Services.

27. #27
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:35 am, TXGator said:

    When she talks about cutting Obama open, shouldn’t a cop stop her, maybe get the Secret Service over to her house? Isn’t that a little more serious than a bumper sticker?

28. #28
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:35 am, behiker said:

    I tried, but just couldn’t do it… I couldn’t read the whole thing. Not only was it nauseating, but I lost interest. Does she actually get paid to write that crap?

29. #29
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:36 am, TXGator said:

    OH GOD, I’m thinking like a lawyer.

30. #30
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:37 am, chapoutier said:

    OH GOD, I’m thinking like a lawyer.

    A liberal one at that.

    Your “Liberal Introductory Kit” is in the mail.

    Welcome, brother.

31. #31
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:37 am, simcoe said:

    I felt like I was reading a young girl’s diary after she had just discovered boys.

32. #32
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:39 am, cnsrvativ1st said:

    I think that conservatives are vulnerable to liberals who tolerate them, especially when they live in DC. For example, as much as I like and admire Laura Ingraham she’ll often speak positively about a lib media person or a lib reporter with the qualifier that “He’s always been nice to me.” Rush does the same thing with the Politico boys ignoring their obvious bias and stating that “They always treat me fairly.” Rush and Laura are two of my favorites and I continue to respect and admire them but to an infinitely lesser degree than Ms.Parker, they seem to suffer from the same disease.

    You just can’t care what the lib media says or writes about you or how you perceive it treats you. It’s irrelevant.
    They are the enemy. Period.

33. #33
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:40 am, TXGator said:

    It stings a little, but I’m sure I won’t miss my soul once the kit’s extractor does its job.

34. #34
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:41 am, Wade said:

    Hopefully someone gave Parker depends.

35. #35
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:44 am, Flyoverman said:

    This woman’s intellect is so deep you could wade in it and your toenails would remain dry.

36. #36
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:44 am, J S Ragman said:

    Not only was it the first journey home for the new president since he assumed office, but the entire Obama family was aboard.

    I didn’t know they went to Indonesia.

37. #37
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:45 am, dan708 said:

    At one point, Ms. Parker was reliably conservative. When (and why) did she take the Huffington KoolAid?

38. #38
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:46 am, Milwaukee Mike said:

    Careful Kathleen! This seems very similar to how Monica got her start.

39. #39
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:50 am, battleaxe said:

    Obama writes slowly too, because he knows some journalists are slow readers.

40. #40
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:53 am, Jarhead said:

    My two 13-year-old seatmates were mesmerized by tales of Air Force One, I tell you.

    My summation to this quote is Ms. Parker’s two 13-year-old seatmates were not mesmerized to by the tale of AF1, but by the drool coming down her chin (her droll bucket was left on AF1). Then thinking to themselves she must be Mentally Challenged, the poor dear.

41. #41
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:54 am, happy2behere said:

    Parker’s column reads exactly like my 12-year-old daughter’s “Clique” novels. I’d better get rid of those or she might grow up sounding like that, eeeww…

42. #42
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:55 am, wighttrasch said:

    Leave the smoking part out of it—

    you said nothing when they came for the smokers…now that you’re halfway down that slippery slope, you wonder where your liberties went??

43. #43
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:55 am, TXGator said:

    Get the feeling Kathleen kept messing up the upholstery wherever she sat down?

44. #44
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:57 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    The old EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES fable was really ahead of it’s time. Comrade Obama (PBUH) has no clothes! And Kathleen Parker sees the finest threads, stitches, nuances, and pronouncements coming from the President.
    ***
    Something seems to go wrong big-time when someone goes into journalism or puts on a collar backwards and becomes a priest or minister.
    ***
    I can not believe how many otherwise rational people I know who think the Messiah is the savior who will make everything better for them. His policies and actions will cost all of us big-time soon. I am waiting for them to fill out their 2010 income tax forms–if they are still employed. Reality will hit home soon.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

45. #45
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:58 am, TXGator said:

    When the came for the bumper stickers, I said nothing….
    When they came for the AM radio, I said nothing….
    When they came for my money, I said nothing….
    When they come for my guns….I will say nothing.
    No warning for them.

46. #46
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, flmom said:

    The glamour of it all.

    This last statement says it all, Kathleen Parker is dazzled by an image, as were a large section of voters. An image that has been carefully crafted by Axelrod et al. This is a sad statement on our society, though I’m disgusted with Parker, she should know better.

47. #47
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:07 pm, GraniteMan said:

    Is the media biased?

48. #48
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, frostrt said:

    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:55 am, TXGator said:
    Get the feeling Kathleen kept messing up the upholstery wherever she sat down?

    ————————————–

    That was pretty gross . . . but funny.

    

49. #49
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, JustAThought said:

    He speaks so slowly, not for the media… .

    No, not for the media. It is so that the libtards can understand and keep up, much as one would talk with a person suffering from any other cognitive disability or brain damage.

50. #50
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, nlebou said:

    Your “Liberal Introductory Kit” is in the mail.

    TXGator…..Step away from the paakage!!

51. #51
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:19 pm, nlebou said:

    Your “Liberal Introductory Kit” is in the mail.

    TXGator…..Step away from the package!!

52. #52
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, JustAThought said:

    He speaks so slowly, not for the media… .

    No, not for the media. It is so that the libtards can understand and keep up, much as one would talk with a person suffering from any other cognitive disability or brain damage.

    I thought he was doing it because he was hoping someone would come to his rescue with a teleprompter.

    How does a liberal deal with a fascist dictator? They re-elect him!

53. #53
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, TXGator said:

    I’ll get some crap sniffing dogs to check it first!
    I kid lawyers…thank God they’re around. Who else would’ve allowed an illegal alien to sue me for breaking up a fight at the school where I taught?

54. #54
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, thegreatbeast said:

    How about a moratorium on Parker stories? I had no idea who she was until a couple of months ago and I am anxious to forget her. She does not warrant our attention.

55. #55
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, Cosmo said:

    olsantaroy said:

    Kathleen was once one of my favorite columnists, until she went anti-Palin during the campaign. Now my ardor has definitely cooled.

    Talk to Chris Matthews about how to rekindle the leg tingle…

56. #56
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:36 pm, Cosmo said:

    wighttrasch said:

    Leave the smoking part out of it—

    you said nothing when they came for the smokers…now that you’re halfway down that slippery slope, you wonder where your liberties went??

    I’m not mentioning the smoking as a liberty issue, but rather a lack of self-control and a health issue–since Fawning Parker was the one who noted how “lean and fit” he is.

    Off-topic:
    I respect the rights of anyone to smoke where they may. If they choose to smoke where it affects me, I expect them to respect my right to expectorate where I may–and I may right in their face.

57. #57
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Sounds like Kathleen is a little mandingopausal. Must be hot flash season.
    Reminds me of this:

    Larry Donner: The night was hot, wait no, the night, the night was humid. The night was humid, no wait, hot, hot. The night was hot. The night was hot and wet, wet and hot. The night was wet and hot, hot and wet, wet and hot; that’s humid. The night was humid.
    —–
    Larry Donner: The night was dry, yet it was raining.
    —–
    Mrs. Lift: The night was sultry.

58. #58
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:52 pm, happyscrapper said:

    The MSM is not reporting the increasing violence on the Mexican border. There are masses of protesters down there, protesting against the military. There are increasing voices being lifted in protest of Obama’s policies. This is happening even in our schools. Not all of our kids have been brainwashed. Now, if the media would just do their job and actually report this incredible news, this could get interesting. Oh, never mind.

59. #59
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, happyscrapper said:

    By the way, speaking of smoking, has anyone hugged or kissed a smoker lately? P.U. Not sexy at all. My apologies to any of the smokers here, but that is just a fact. I would be very turned off just getting a whiff of Obama’s breath.

60. #60
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Now, if the media would just do their job and actually report this incredible news, this could get interesting. Oh, never mind.

    Let’s not get ahead of ourselves! There are MUCH more important things to consider right now.

    Don’t you know that the Obamas are a story of perfection? They’re highly educated (and not because of affirmative action or anything), thin, fit and beautiful people — with Michelle O resembling the class and style of Jackie O.

    /sarcasm

61. #61
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:56 pm, zorro said:

    Kathleen Parker = Groupie
    I wonder if she threw her thong at the One?

62. #62
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, happyscrapper said:

    with Michelle O resembling the class and style of Jackie O.

    You mean, Jackie O. on steroids, don’t you?

63. #63
    On February 19th, 2009 at 12:59 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    You mean, Jackie O. on steroids, don’t you?

    Maybe, not sure. I read somewhere in the UK papers about someone saying that MO reminded them of Flip Wilson in drag.

    Is that what you’re referring to?

64. #64
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, TXGator said:

    happyscrapper said:

    You mean, Jackie O. on steroids, don’t you?

    Got me chuckling over here. Nice work.
    Weird how she seems much more masculine than he does.

65. #65
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:18 pm, Paul Revere said:

    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:55 am, TXGator said:
    Get the feeling Kathleen kept messing up the upholstery wherever she sat down?

    *Claire McCaskill, please report to the chair. Claire McCaskill, please report to the chair*

66. #66
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    After reading that, I have the strange feeling that the floor is sticky. Ewwww!

    Hope is not a plan; not all change is good. The resistance is here; the resistance is now. RESIST!!!

    ECS

67. #67
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, TXGator said:

    I may have crossed the line, but Kathleen did it first.
    Isn’t that the Dem excuse for everything? I can haz it now?

68. #68
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:31 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Maybe, not sure. I read somewhere in the UK papers about someone saying that MO reminded them of Flip Wilson in drag.

    Is that what you’re referring to?

    Perhaps that’s it…and she is “going to fiiiind Ray Charles, honey!” Remember?

69. #69
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, JT said:

    Douche chills. Ewwww.

70. #70
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, Cosmo said:

    Flip Wilson in drag…that is quite possibly the most astute (and funny) observation I’ve heard all week.

    Couple that with the Black Widow dress from inauguration night and we’ve got the makings of a super hero.

71. #71
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, MtsEdge said:

    You just can’t care what the lib media says or writes about you or how you perceive it treats you. It’s irrelevant.
    They are the enemy. Period.

    Hear, hear. Satan is an angel of light, as well. We must never forget who the enemy is.

72. #72
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:49 pm, dadinseattle said:

    Am I the only one, or do any of you find Obama’s fast-then-slow speech pattern too distracting to attend to what is being said?

    This is a deliberate technique-he also puts a hard emphasis on ending words or certain phrases for the “voice of authority”
    effect!

    This allows him to sound like he knows what he is talking about!

    ‘I have stated often ,…that the notion of tax cuts… are failed policy.’

73. #73
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, MtsEdge said:

    This is a deliberate technique-he also puts a hard emphasis on ending words or certain phrases for the “voice of authority”
    effect!

    Form without substance…

74. #74
    On February 19th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, cabrerski said:

    Quick, someone contact Sears for a Diehard battery. Kathleen’s personal massage device cannot withstand the strain on the normal current demand. Wanna bet the ceiling has a large picture of The One plastered on it?

    I think Ms. Parker has reverted to her preadolescent days and is waiting for her copy of “Tiger Beat” with Barry on the cover.

75. #75
    On February 19th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I’m sorry, I couldn’t bring myself to read it. But, I have to know… Did she refer to him as “Dreamy!”

76. #76
    On February 19th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    OT:

    I respect the rights of anyone to smoke where they may. If they choose to smoke where it affects me, I expect them to respect my right to expectorate where I may–and I may right in their face.

    Steve Martin: “Mind if I smoke?” “Not at all, mind if I fart?”

77. #77
    On February 19th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, TXGator said:

    She was constantly making her “O-face”.

78. #78
    On February 19th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, mattm said:

    I need a barf bag, not a drool bucket.

79. #79
    On February 19th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, wighttrasch said:

    Hey, if a smoker blew smoke right in your face, I’d say you were ok to ‘expectorate’ in their face too.

    But otherwise, I thought what I did on my own time was okay?

80. #80
    On February 19th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    She was constantly making her “O-face”.

    I make an “O-face” too when I hear Dear Leader speak. It usually goes like this: He says something, and I roll my eyes and groan “Oh, (expletive deleted)!”

81. #81
    On February 19th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, L.N. Smithee said:

    Out of Syrup of Ipecac? Parker’s lubricated essay didn’t do the trick? Not to worry!

    Get a load of this comment below from a Daily Beast reader:

    sfm123

    I loved your quote about the “little buddha inside Omama”,(sic) it’s really weird but when I see him I feel calmer and more hopeful and more reassured. I am also inspired to get up everyday and be more positive and energized to get my work done…when I am feeling a bit down and not motivated, I think about what he has accomplished and I am reenergized. Its really amazing…he’s got something magical working. In all of my 56 yrs, I have NEVER felt this inspired by anyone..when he visited Chicago this weekend and there was not a lot of press about him, I missed seeing him. He is the presence we need in these turbulent times. Sometimes I think maybe its a lot of pressure and burden to put on this young man, but somehow I know he can handle it!!!

82. #82
    On February 19th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, Kevin K. said:

    chapoutier said: (#30)

    Your “Liberal Introductory Kit” is in the mail.

    What happened?? I thought we had successfully gotten you away from the Dark Side?

83. #83
    On February 19th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, Kevin K. said:

    I tried reading the article, I really did. Unfortunately, after about 40% all it did was make my hunger go away and replace it with a real queasy feeling.

    (And I’m sorry to see Flip Wilson’s “Geraldine” mixed up with such a fooling columnist, but it was good to think of some of his stuff. Thanks.)

84. #84
    On February 19th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, Lindsay said:

    Kathleen Parker’s writing has gone the way of her youth: downhill.

    Her writing is incoherent at times… wandering, dangling participles are interjected with Frenchie terms to impress us maroons. She oozes the simple-minded thought processes of a junior high wallflower with a crush on the high school quarterback. Airsick bag, indeed.

    Kathleen is like a puppy wanting to be petted–desperate for attention and wagging her tail rapidly.Hint: in middle age, KP, it is not very appealing. You need to consult your MD for something for those hot flashes of yours. Libs, please provide her some praise as she has left the conservatives for good.

    We get it, Kathleen, you like the Obamas. You are way cool. Someone please tase her.

85. #85
    On February 19th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    What happened?? I thought we had successfully gotten you away from the Dark Side?

    Conservatism is the cheap hooker I mess around with behind Liberalism’s back. Its fun for an occasional thrill, and I keep stringing it along saying “shhhh…It’s okay…one day I’ll leave Liberalism and take you away from all this…It’s just not the right time…” But, deep down inside we both know I would never leave. So, after washing Conservatism’s cheap perfume off me, I return home to have a home cooked meal with Liberalism, who is none the wiser. Meanwhile, Conservatism is back at the hotel room I rented, because let’s face it, where else does she have to go, crying her eyes out telling her THIS time was the last, but knowing its not.

86. #86
    On February 19th, 2009 at 8:20 pm, Kevin K. said:

    Re: Chapoutier’s #85

    Laughing…and laughing.

    Guess we’ll have to come up with better wine and work on our cooking.

87. #87
    On February 19th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, beenthere said:

    I never liked Parker, not one little bit, but this is beyond weird. If I were her husband I would be getting to a lawyer fast and packing my bags. Any day now she’s going to announce to the media he forced her to wear high-heels so she had to get out the shotgun . . .

    For someone who won an H.L. Mencken award in journalism (and who says affirmative action doesn’t work?), well, it is time to give it back. Before her writing was just dumb and infuriating — in equal parts. Now it is hide-your-eyes awful. This reminds me of the time she said Andrea Yates was having a “bad marriage day.” Oh the clever word play! Or the time she sucked up to Janet Reno. Or groveled before her black readers because she mistakenly wrote that the Duke Three were “lynched.” You see, that word is owned completely by the black community because no white person has ever been lynched.

    And so it goes. She no longer appears at National Review but I am unsure about the reasons. In any event, it is time for her to deal with her personal issues in private. Bye Kathleen. It hasn’t been fun.

88. #88
    On February 19th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, torabora said:

    duh1 speaks slooooooooowly because he’s stuuuuuuuuupid. sheesh….

89. #89
    On February 19th, 2009 at 10:49 pm, kayfromcarroll said:

    On February 19th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    Conservatism is the cheap hooker I mess around with behind Liberalism’s back. Its fun for an occasional thrill, and I keep stringing it along saying “shhhh…It’s okay…one day I’ll leave Liberalism and take you away from all this…It’s just not the right time…” But, deep down inside we both know I would never leave. So, after washing Conservatism’s cheap perfume off me, I return home to have a home cooked meal with Liberalism, who is none the wiser. Meanwhile, Conservatism is back at the hotel room I rented, because let’s face it, where else does she have to go, crying her eyes out telling her THIS time was the last, but knowing its not.

    Chap, you forgot the part about it being a “dark and stormy night”!

90. #90
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:02 pm, hitcharide said:

    I can see the commercial now…in time for the major holidays, you can buy the obama blow up toy of your choice and send it to a journalist in need. It comes with a care package including an issue of NYTimes, Starbucks coffee, a do-it-yourself home abortion kit and a personalized race card! Dryer safe, it produces its’ own hot air for inflation and is equipped with a language center, randomly saying things like “hope and change.” (Sarcasm aside, I give it two months before there is something like that on the market, and two weeks after that ms. parker will start a collection!)

91. #91
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:27 pm, nostradamslives said:

    Parker is a PATHETIC PARTISAN PUPPET.
    Jeffrey Schrembs, American Citizen

92. #92
    On February 19th, 2009 at 11:54 pm, TacitEagle said:

    The jaws of life will be needed to extract these folks from 0bama’s rear end.

93. #93
    On February 20th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    The Obamanites must have made Kathleen an offer she cannot resist. Take that anyway you want.

94. #94
    On February 20th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Forgot something: Y’all go back and read Cnsrvativ1st #32 post. Ding, ding! I think that is the best post on this thread!

95. #95
    On February 20th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    I swear, Chapoutier, your analogy of the cheap hooker was one of the funniest things you have ever written. LMAO.
    Hitcharide #90 – You, too!
    You guys are killing me with the witty remarks.

96. #96
    On February 20th, 2009 at 5:03 pm, DanGrantTx said:

    Maybe reading Kathleen Parker’s screed on the public library computer is cheaper than trashy romance novels for the hausenfrau set?