Gimme, gimme, gimme: More scenes from the anti-Obama entitlement backlash

By Michelle Malkin  •  February 19, 2009 12:15 PM

So, a CNBC host is calling for a new “tea party” to protest Barack Obama’s out-of-control spendulus/entitlement culture? We’ve been doing it all week. Seattle, Denver, Mesa. Kansas this weekend. And more outbreaks to come. I’m posting a second round of photos from KFYI’s anti-porkulus protest in Arizona yesterday in opposition to Barack Obama’s visit to push his massive housing entitlement campaign. Thanks to La Mano at Sticker Patch for the pics. The revolt against the savior-based economy continues…

***

Via CBSNews EconWatch, Obama’s massive mortgage entitlement plan gets panned:

President Obama’s
mortgage bailout announcement on Wednesday directs $75 billion in government funds to bail out certain borrowers who are behind on mortgage payments or “at risk” of falling behind.

Although the president said that “it will not rescue the unscrupulous or irresponsible,” there’s no requirement that that U.S. Treasury deny bailouts to Americans who took outsize risks in hopes that their homes would continue to appreciate.

Which is why Obama’s announcement has drawn a howl of protest from renters and those people — yes, they exist — who bought cheaper, modest homes they could comfortably afford.

BuckNakedPolitics writes: “I have little sympathy in one sense with the moans of homeowners stuck with negative equity as a result of a gamble that the value of homes would always go up, up, up. One reason I’m living in an apartment is that I recognized that this myth was a myth.”

Conservative blogger Michelle Malkin describes it as a new “massive mortgage entitlement campaign.” Housing bubble blog Patrick.net dubbed it a “plan to reward debtors at the expense of savers.”

NewsRantsAndReviews says:”Obama has one word for those who didn’t get in over their heads during the recent housing boom and have paid their mortgages on time: Suckers!”

…A reader post at the New York Times says: “I should have lied about my income and refinanced in 2005 for the full ‘value’ of the loan with a low, low teaser rate. Than I should have used the cash for new appliances, vacations, flat screen TVs. Oh and I could have financed all of my son’s college instead of taking out all those loans.”

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On February 20th, 2009 at 10:32 am, terristeelmagnolia said:

    Weary Citizen:
    I am so glad you read my second post!!

    I know I don’t know any of you folks,
    but I was crushed b/c I had a feeling you all didn’t know what I was really saying, and that’s my fault for not explaining it properly in the first place.

    I forget you don’t “know” me like my blogger friends.

    I will do better explaining myself if there is a “next time” … it taught me a lesson.

    I am with all of you folks, and I am sick to death of moochers and people wanting hand outs… especially since we have always lived our life living within our means… we have never had credit card debt and have two ten yr old cars … we only owe on the mortgage on our home… we are pretty much tight wads… LOL

    The past month w/ Obama in office has been the most miserable month.

    Like my husband says,

    Elections have consequences.

  2. #102
    On February 20th, 2009 at 10:54 am, Weary Citizen said:

    On February 20th, 2009 at 10:32 am, terristeelmagnolia said:

    No worries. Don’t take things to heart so much. We have all made posts that didn’t exactly portray what we intended. The only thing you/we can do is restate it more clearly and move on. And if it is what you really believe then you have to stand up for that. I certianly don’t agree with everyone on this board and sometimes it gets ugly. But hey that is what makes it fun.

  3. #103
    On February 20th, 2009 at 11:00 am, Weary Citizen said:

    On February 20th, 2009 at 10:32 am, terristeelmagnolia said:

    Meant to add, I really do hope everythgin works out for you. I could not imagine dealing with a child with serious health issues. It’s the double whammy of finacnial and emotional issues.

    Frankly, I do beleive it is totally wrong for a family to be bankrupted due to health reasons. I generally am not in favor of gov’t intervention in anything, but the gov’t right now ensures illegal aliens and the “poor” are cared for at taxpayer expense. So how is it ok for them but not for the people who actually work and support these parasites?

  4. #104
    On February 20th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, terristeelmagnolia said:

    WC

    I feel EXACTLY as you do.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Stimulus-Backed ‘Green’ Bankruptcy of the Week: Ener1

January 26, 2012 03:06 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

Battery maker on verge of going terminals-up

Obama’s Green Robber Barons

January 25, 2012 09:13 AM by Michelle Malkin

88 Comments

The Bank of (Democratic Party) America

January 18, 2012 09:12 AM by Michelle Malkin

84 Comments

Bailing out the world

November 30, 2011 09:35 AM by Michelle Malkin

131 Comments

Breaking: Barney Frank will not seek re-election

November 28, 2011 09:54 AM by Michelle Malkin

168 Comments

Latest Supporter of Passing the Jobs Bill: God

November 2, 2011 03:09 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

“We can’t wait!”


Categories: fiscal stimulus,Subprime crisis

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook