<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bobby Jindal and the expectations game; plus: which MSNBC host said &#8220;Oh, god?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:24:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jindal is right on &#124; Liberty Confidential</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-638346</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jindal is right on &#124; Liberty Confidential</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-638346</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog has some of his remarks and her thoughts. Full speach is available at the LA Times blog, for anyone who wants the whole thing. All-in-all a great job and a great message. Here is some of the comments from the end of the address; which was, as Malkin points out, the best moment. In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear - because our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust - and rightly so. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog has some of his remarks and her thoughts. Full speach is available at the LA Times blog, for anyone who wants the whole thing. All-in-all a great job and a great message. Here is some of the comments from the end of the address; which was, as Malkin points out, the best moment. In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear &#8211; because our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust &#8211; and rightly so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Jindal is right on &#124; Lounge Daddy&#8217;s Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-636454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Jindal is right on &#124; Lounge Daddy&#8217;s Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-636454</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog has some of his remarks and her thoughts. Full speach is available at the LA Times blog, for anyone who wants the whole thing. All-in-all a great job and a great message. Here is some of the comments from the end of the address; which was, as Malkin points out, the best moment. In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear - because our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust - and rightly so. Tonight, on behalf of our leaders in Congress and my fellow Republican governors, I say: Our party is determined to regain your trust. We will do so by standing up for the principles that we share - the principles you elected us to fight for - the principles that built this into the greatest, most prosperous country on earth. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin&#8217;s blog has some of his remarks and her thoughts. Full speach is available at the LA Times blog, for anyone who wants the whole thing. All-in-all a great job and a great message. Here is some of the comments from the end of the address; which was, as Malkin points out, the best moment. In recent years, these distinctions in philosophy became less clear &#8211; because our party got away from its principles. You elected Republicans to champion limited government, fiscal discipline, and personal responsibility. Instead, Republicans went along with earmarks and big government spending in Washington. Republicans lost your trust &#8211; and rightly so. Tonight, on behalf of our leaders in Congress and my fellow Republican governors, I say: Our party is determined to regain your trust. We will do so by standing up for the principles that we share &#8211; the principles you elected us to fight for &#8211; the principles that built this into the greatest, most prosperous country on earth. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2/27-Views from the Heartland: Other Blogs &#171; American Heartland Bar and Grill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-635014</link>
		<dc:creator>2/27-Views from the Heartland: Other Blogs &#171; American Heartland Bar and Grill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-635014</guid>
		<description>[...] Steele, on the day he was elected head of the Republican National Committee (RNC), immediately started talking aboot rebuilding and the very first region mentioned was the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steele, on the day he was elected head of the Republican National Committee (RNC), immediately started talking aboot rebuilding and the very first region mentioned was the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Layman’s Plan for the GOP – Return to Conservative Principles. &#124; The Great Illuminator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-634217</link>
		<dc:creator>A Layman’s Plan for the GOP – Return to Conservative Principles. &#124; The Great Illuminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-634217</guid>
		<description>[...] core problem with the Republican Party today is not whether it has a good, charismatic candidate to counteract Obama, but that it has departed from conservative principles. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] core problem with the Republican Party today is not whether it has a good, charismatic candidate to counteract Obama, but that it has departed from conservative principles. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nlebou</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633733</link>
		<dc:creator>nlebou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 02:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633733</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, ClassicFilm said:&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Jindal &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a breath of fresh air for Louisiana. He is very intelligent, practical, and a true conservative. He is doing a great job. This country would be very lucky to have him as president but I hope he stays here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pm, ClassicFilm said:</p></blockquote>
<p>Jindal <em>is</em> a breath of fresh air for Louisiana. He is very intelligent, practical, and a true conservative. He is doing a great job. This country would be very lucky to have him as president but I hope he stays here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClassicFilm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633527</link>
		<dc:creator>ClassicFilm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633527</guid>
		<description>The snide insults were pre-written against Jindal, just as they were for Palin, intended to be a pre-emptive strike to decimate the validity of their stance against Obama/socialism. Our mainstream media has become the dewy-eyed Love Boat cruise director for the USSR Obama. More Americans, including thinking Democrats, are seeing this hypocrisy for what it is, and the time for a huge backfire is only a short matter of time. Gird your loins...

The insulting of Jindal is an interesting move because while Democrats can&#039;t recklessly spend our tax dollars fast enough, they fear/loath Jindal because he SOUNDS LIKE AN AMERICAN and may have the right mentality &amp; game plan for turning the economy back around. Uh oh, OB may be usurped. Jindal is now a viable contender against The One - it signifies the beginning of their over-reaching to discredit Jindal. Soon, some bitter, overzealous Dem commentator will stupidly and hatefully pull an over-the-top &quot;Imus&quot; against East Indians or Jindal. They just can&#039;t help themselves because the vast majority of them are fire-breathing closet racists.

Jindal was a breath of fresh air, devoid of puffery or pomposity. Just an honorable man who embraces the greatness of America. In America, we CAN do anything... without government meddling or mandates.

I&#039;ve not ever seen Jindal before this speech, and I have more respect and faith in him from just one speech than I do of our president-elect and his tiresome overexposure in the media spotlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The snide insults were pre-written against Jindal, just as they were for Palin, intended to be a pre-emptive strike to decimate the validity of their stance against Obama/socialism. Our mainstream media has become the dewy-eyed Love Boat cruise director for the USSR Obama. More Americans, including thinking Democrats, are seeing this hypocrisy for what it is, and the time for a huge backfire is only a short matter of time. Gird your loins&#8230;</p>
<p>The insulting of Jindal is an interesting move because while Democrats can&#8217;t recklessly spend our tax dollars fast enough, they fear/loath Jindal because he SOUNDS LIKE AN AMERICAN and may have the right mentality &amp; game plan for turning the economy back around. Uh oh, OB may be usurped. Jindal is now a viable contender against The One &#8211; it signifies the beginning of their over-reaching to discredit Jindal. Soon, some bitter, overzealous Dem commentator will stupidly and hatefully pull an over-the-top &#8220;Imus&#8221; against East Indians or Jindal. They just can&#8217;t help themselves because the vast majority of them are fire-breathing closet racists.</p>
<p>Jindal was a breath of fresh air, devoid of puffery or pomposity. Just an honorable man who embraces the greatness of America. In America, we CAN do anything&#8230; without government meddling or mandates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not ever seen Jindal before this speech, and I have more respect and faith in him from just one speech than I do of our president-elect and his tiresome overexposure in the media spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amchristian</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633510</link>
		<dc:creator>amchristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633510</guid>
		<description>I was really shocked when the Fox News panel rated Mr. Jindal. I was quite impressed and uplifted by Mr. Jindal&#039;s response. 

The potshots at  his &quot;Simple&quot; way of talking and his &quot;simple&quot; stories was just.. bizarre.. to me. I liked his clarity and I think his example story expressed exactly the idea he meant to express. 

Sometimes I wonder if these folks on television are seeing and hearing the same things I see and hear. 

Thanks for sticking up for Mr. Jindal, Michelle. You Rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really shocked when the Fox News panel rated Mr. Jindal. I was quite impressed and uplifted by Mr. Jindal&#8217;s response. </p>
<p>The potshots at  his &#8220;Simple&#8221; way of talking and his &#8220;simple&#8221; stories was just.. bizarre.. to me. I liked his clarity and I think his example story expressed exactly the idea he meant to express. </p>
<p>Sometimes I wonder if these folks on television are seeing and hearing the same things I see and hear. </p>
<p>Thanks for sticking up for Mr. Jindal, Michelle. You Rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nhpatriot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633504</link>
		<dc:creator>nhpatriot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633504</guid>
		<description>I heard someone (was it Rush?) say that he sounded like he was addressing first graders ... you know, given the intelligence level of half of the American people (i.e. those who voted for Obama), maybe that was the plan so they might actually understand some of it! Ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard someone (was it Rush?) say that he sounded like he was addressing first graders &#8230; you know, given the intelligence level of half of the American people (i.e. those who voted for Obama), maybe that was the plan so they might actually understand some of it! Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JABbering Stooge :: Speaking of Stalkin&#8217; Malkin&#8230; :: February :: 2009</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633499</link>
		<dc:creator>JABbering Stooge :: Speaking of Stalkin&#8217; Malkin&#8230; :: February :: 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633499</guid>
		<description>[...] does it say about Malkin&#8217;s irrelevance if she&#8217;s pretty much the only one on the right defending Gov. Jindal&#8217;s trainwreck of a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] does it say about Malkin&#8217;s irrelevance if she&#8217;s pretty much the only one on the right defending Gov. Jindal&#8217;s trainwreck of a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MSNBC Sneers At Bobby Jindal BEFORE He Gives His Speech &#171; Jane Q. Republican</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633455</link>
		<dc:creator>MSNBC Sneers At Bobby Jindal BEFORE He Gives His Speech &#171; Jane Q. Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633455</guid>
		<description>[...] Sneers At Bobby Jindal BEFORE He Gives His&#160;Speech  Jump to Comments Real Clear Politics via Michelle Malkin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sneers At Bobby Jindal BEFORE He Gives His&nbsp;Speech  Jump to Comments Real Clear Politics via Michelle Malkin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidcaskey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633446</link>
		<dc:creator>davidcaskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633446</guid>
		<description>I think Mathews&#039; comment was racist. Lets stike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mathews&#8217; comment was racist. Lets stike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies or Ignorance: Take Your Pick Republicans - Page 2 - The Political Hotwire</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633351</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies or Ignorance: Take Your Pick Republicans - Page 2 - The Political Hotwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633351</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the spawn of Satan Michelle Malkin was forced to admit he sucked, albeit in a round about way.  Michelle Malkin � Bobby Jindal and the expectations game; plus: which MSNBC host said “Oh, god?&#8230;    david brooks trashed him too. EEESH. tough [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lies or Ignorance: Take Your Pick Republicans - The Political Hotwire</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633344</link>
		<dc:creator>Lies or Ignorance: Take Your Pick Republicans - The Political Hotwire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633344</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Re: Lies or Ignorance: Take Your Pick Republicans     Jindal&#8217;s response: Panned, seared &#8211; Andy Barr &#8211; POLITICO.com  “I think he had a really poor performance tonight, I’m sorry to say,” National Public Radio’s Juan Williams said on a Fox News panel&#8230;Williams went on to call the governor’s remarks “sing-songy” and said Jindal looked “childish” compared to Obama.  Even the spawn of Satan Michelle Malkin was forced to admit he sucked, albeit in a round about way.  Michelle Malkin  Bobby Jindal and the expectations game; plus: which MSNBC host said &#8220;Oh, god&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633335</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633335</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We are D O N E if we can’t find someone with some STYLE!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d like to know why Gov. Palin wasn&#039;t the Republican answering, got an idea, RNC still run by the Bush&#039;s, Country Club Repubs what ever you want to call them. Palin got McShame even and even a few % points ahead in the race until he decides to close the campaign and fix the economy, the dufus. I have alot of questions about the renewed RNC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We are D O N E if we can’t find someone with some STYLE!</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d like to know why Gov. Palin wasn&#8217;t the Republican answering, got an idea, RNC still run by the Bush&#8217;s, Country Club Repubs what ever you want to call them. Palin got McShame even and even a few % points ahead in the race until he decides to close the campaign and fix the economy, the dufus. I have alot of questions about the renewed RNC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T-Bone</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/24/bobby-jindal-and-the-expectations-game/comment-page-2/#comment-633303</link>
		<dc:creator>T-Bone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23774#comment-633303</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm, farmgal said: 
I think there should have been a lot more passion and outrage,but it’s like all the Republicans are afraid to touch Obama.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree but Jindal had to be very careful about what he said. It was the content of his speech that lacked not so much his delivery. He had to hold back because of Obama worship. When Peolosi, Reed, Webb et al did their Bush rebuttals , they were mean, nasty &amp; hard hitting. But they could afford to be because they had the MSM backing them up. 

Jindal had to be careful to not appear to be obstructionist and anti Obama because of the widespread adulation of Obama. People don&#039;t like it when you cut their main dude to the quick. You are cutting them as well and they will build a barrier to that response. 

He made some good points about Republican values. I wanted to see him hit harder, such as on the no earmarks b.s. that Obama keeps spewing. Depends on your definition of &quot;is&quot;. I would also like to see a counter of the comment that Dems love about inheriting Bushs recession. Bush inherited Clintons recession and didn&#039;t whine about it like a little baby. Also the 8 years of failed policies line. Bush did pretty good for coming into a recession, fighting wars, facing MAJOR natural disasters, and fighting off the MSM and the Democratic haters all the while. In fact, the ecomomy only tanked after Democrats took control of Congress for the last 2 years and Democratic control was forecast for all 3 branches of Government. Maybe people know something. 

Anyway, he did not want to appear to be the realist or antagonist at this particular time. He was walking on eggshells. Hopefully, we will bring out the big guns soon though. The Dems have given us a lot of ammunition. Baby steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm, farmgal said:<br />
I think there should have been a lot more passion and outrage,but it’s like all the Republicans are afraid to touch Obama.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree but Jindal had to be very careful about what he said. It was the content of his speech that lacked not so much his delivery. He had to hold back because of Obama worship. When Peolosi, Reed, Webb et al did their Bush rebuttals , they were mean, nasty &amp; hard hitting. But they could afford to be because they had the MSM backing them up. </p>
<p>Jindal had to be careful to not appear to be obstructionist and anti Obama because of the widespread adulation of Obama. People don&#8217;t like it when you cut their main dude to the quick. You are cutting them as well and they will build a barrier to that response. </p>
<p>He made some good points about Republican values. I wanted to see him hit harder, such as on the no earmarks b.s. that Obama keeps spewing. Depends on your definition of &#8220;is&#8221;. I would also like to see a counter of the comment that Dems love about inheriting Bushs recession. Bush inherited Clintons recession and didn&#8217;t whine about it like a little baby. Also the 8 years of failed policies line. Bush did pretty good for coming into a recession, fighting wars, facing MAJOR natural disasters, and fighting off the MSM and the Democratic haters all the while. In fact, the ecomomy only tanked after Democrats took control of Congress for the last 2 years and Democratic control was forecast for all 3 branches of Government. Maybe people know something. </p>
<p>Anyway, he did not want to appear to be the realist or antagonist at this particular time. He was walking on eggshells. Hopefully, we will bring out the big guns soon though. The Dems have given us a lot of ammunition. Baby steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
