See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. Jennifer Loven not ‘Loven’ Republicans, already dissing them before B. Hussein Obama talks tonight | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
2. Bobby Jindal’s Speech « JoHNBRoDiGaNDoTCoM
3. The Obama Road to Socialism and the Enslavement of the Poor « Jim Blazsik
4. Sister Toldjah
5. Instapundit » Blog Archive » FOR THE SPEECH: Playing O-Bingo. Er, okay….
6. Obama’s Non-State of the Union Address « Frustrated with Politics
7. Live Streaming: Chairman Obama’s Lecture Of Empty Platitudes (24 Feb 09) | Democrat = Socialist
8. Hamas slipped note to Obama via senator Kerry ( Obama gives $900 million package to Hamas) « Goodtimepolitics
9. My B.O. Dump. Constipated No More! « OutOfTheBlu
10. Quick Post; Keeping up with Obama « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
11. Obama Cannot Perform Without Teleprompter (Biden Bad With or Without…) « Peace and Freedom Global Future

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #501
   On February 25th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, wighttrasch said:

   hahahaha!

   Someone’s anus is chapped.

2. #502
   On February 25th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, backwoods conservative said:

   Someone’s anus is chapped.

   How dare you take Chapoutier’s name in vain!

3. #504
   On February 25th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, emjem24 said:

   undresiege said:

   You bore me, and don’t offend me as much as the likes of emjem. There 100 or more John Deauxs on this blog with their rants and talk radio talking points. Frankly, you don’t interest me. People like em and soap are the most repugnant types to me because the put up a leaking front.

   Hmmmm… this is the biggest bunch of projection and psychoanalysis I’ve ever seen on any blog excluding places like Huff n’ Puff and Kos Kids. How the did I offend you? I barely engage you because most of youe comments reek of liberal disengenuousness and misrepresentation. If you come on this blog to educate us, you’re only reemphasizing stereotypes of what we think “liberals” are and what you think “conservatives” are.

   I’ve read better, reasoned posts from Chaps than from you. You engage in over-the-top hyperbole wrapped in self-congratulatory rhetoric. Exactly what kind of “front” am I putting up? Again, that is projection.

   It takes a certain type of arrogance to call somebody a hypocrite and channel superiority while also calling the person you have all figured out a “female dog.” If this isn’t to be criticized and challenged I don’t know what is.

   It’s interesting that instead of engaging me and proving me wrong you’re reemphasizing everyone’s opinion of you. Shhhhhh… it’s okay, no one knows how shallow you are and how little respect you hold for those nasty “conservatives.” Your secret is safe with me.

4. #505
   On February 25th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, chapoutier said:

   I’ve read better, reasoned posts from Chaps than from you.

   Hey! Thanks!

5. #506
   On February 25th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, emjem24 said:

   undresiege said:
   Who is talking about moral equivalency? I have no idea what would compel you to call me “underwear”. Tell me how a sophisticated “teacher” such as yourself feels compeled to call somebody “underwear”? Is that YOUR idea of smart or clever? You wanna dish it out, then take it back. Save you phony attitude and faux indignation.

   Using “underwear” is my way of “mocking” you for your unoriginality and also using the name of a former poster who was booted. For someone who suggests to another poster to take what they dish out, you seem a bit indignant, hostile, and defensive. I hear therapy is good for stuff like that.

   I’ll never play the “gentleman” role when it comes to you. You hop on here call me “underwear”, and pick at my posts and other liberals while ignoring assassination cracks until I call you on it. You choose do be the guard dog of this blog, you are allegedly female. I stand by every word.

   I’ve engaged with other liberals such as Chaps and others I don’t agree with and here I am astonished that they didn’t need to sink so low as to call me a “female dog.” I know you sell common courtesy and manners real short in the new, improved Modern America, but even I wouldn’t tolerate that from a student or an adult. So it would seem that my mocking name that I and others have given you really does fit.

   I’m not the guardian of this blog- Michelle Malkin is. I have the funny feeling she wouldn’t find calling another poster a “female dog” befitting her standards.

   I have no control over what other posters say on this blog. It’s their opinions not mine and if you think I have that kind of authority, you need to go back to school. I’ve already said I didn’t agree with these things yet you continue to raise this issue.

   Of course you stand by every word because not only are you a coarse and base personality, but one who doesn’t like being challenged or knows what to do when they are.

   Check it. For every “underwear” crack, I’ll talk about your canine qualities. If I touched a nerve, good. Bug off, hypocrite.

   Again, this is a bit defensive for someone secure in not only their personal conduct but one who wouldn’t know right from wrong if it hit them in the face. You never call any woman, and I don’t care where they come from or who they are, a female dog and you better believe I won’t let you or anybody else who says it get away with it.

   As another poster said: get over yourself.

6. #507
   On February 25th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, emjem24 said:

   chapoutier said:

   I’ve read better, reasoned posts from Chaps than from you.

   Hey! Thanks!

   And you thought I never said anything good about you. Even if your arguments are totally wrong.

7. #508
   On February 25th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   On February 25th, 2009 at 11:54 am, undresiege said:
   Your charitable work doesn’t hide your rather nasty soul, and I still think my questions about what you teach those poor children are valid.
   If me calling you out on your spit gets this comment deleted, or me banned, it’s so worth it you disingenuous tool

   I’m not asking you to pardon me if your feelings are hurt, or if you are offended.

   So, tell us all, what are we teaching those poor children?

   As for my soul, you know nada about it but it is safe in the right hands. Is yours?

   Feelings hurt? Offended? I would not give you that kind of power. What you say about me is of ZERO concern to me. Spread your vile rantings, go ahead, it harms me not. It sure makes you look like a very hurt person and we all know hurt people hurt people.

   We will pray for you.

8. #509
   On February 25th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

   On February 25th, 2009 at 12:51 pm, undresiege said:

   WOW – just WOW

9. #510
   On February 25th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, wighttrasch said:

   soap & backwoods–methinks someone used turpentine on said anus too!

10. #511
    On February 25th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, undresiege said:

    So, tell us all, what are we teaching those poor children?

    Well if you lead by example:

    1.Laugh it off, and or ignore if a conservative wishes death on a liberal politician. However, if a liberal refuses to wish Michelle Malkin a happy holiday, never let it go.

    2. Never, ever admit when you’re wrong.

    “Well, the economy is crashing”. Real nice.

11. #512
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    U,

    1. I did not laugh it off.
    2. Your quote is not accurate (not that it matters).
    3. You apologized for reading my comment as a joke when it was not (convenient memory?)
    4. The comment was a sarcastic comment with little chance of their “wish” coming true.
    5. My final comment was: “Everyone has a right to say something stupid”.
    6. I do not let go the hypocrisy of bashing Michelle while never being courteous enough to at the very least wish her a happy birthday.
    7. For someone who has paid so much attention to my comments, all you have to do is ask if I have not admitted to lgm and chap if I have not made errors when commenting about their posts.
    8. You need to get your facts straight.
    9. For someone who cries about TOS, you sure wore that limit on your prior post. Nothing but attacks.
    10. We do lead by example. If you have ever taken the time to find out what that example is – you would be embarrassed.
    11. You should take your #2 to heart.
    12. I am sad for you.

12. #513
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, undresiege said:

    emjemOakley:

    I’m “mocking” now.

    You are a dog. You jumped on the board and started trying to point out what all the liberals were doing wrong in their postings. YOU IGNORED THE 3 SHOT POLITICIANS POSTS UNTIL I CALLED YOU ON IT. I mocked you as the female guard dog of the blog. Now if the word dog offends you because of some old high school demons in which the fellas “mocked” your looks, well that’s not my concern.

    I remember reading this blog leading up to the election,and that nyk chick was receiving all types of racial taunts. Conservatives like AlohaGuy called the taunters to the carpet. What did you do? You defended the racial taunts, “though not agreeing with them”.

    You’re always on this blog trying to point out the supposed “problems” in the posts of liberals. When I joined here, I figured “this stupid beast better not start up with me on a personal level”.

    Low and behold, you come up with “underwear”. That’s fine. Unoriginal and juvenile, but that’s fine “mocking”. I in turn mock your dog qualities. Obviously, the whole “dog” thing hits you on a certain level. I didn’t expect a whole meme out of it, but so it goes. Don’t play that, but I’m a lady crap. I believe in equality of the sexes, and you miss are a dog.

    You can talk about your projection and other psychobabble and I smile. You’re no Dr. Phil, but that won’t stop you from stroking your on false sense of superiority. It doesn’t matter. You don’t matter. Again, the “mocking” can go on as long as you like. I’ll be underwear, and you can be the filthy dog.
    Redneck to redneck, I’ll never show you any respect. I will ignore you, if you ignore me. If you wanna play the “mocking” game, I’ll make you my dog all day.

13. #514
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On February 13th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On February 13th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, undresiege said:
    Sorry soapbox, I guess I mistook this as a lame attempt at humor.

    Apology accepted.

    Rememebr this?

    Now, would you kindly leave me alone as you have nada I want to hear.

14. #515
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, John Deaux said:

    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:05 pm, undresiege said:

    I sincerely hope you don’t expect anybody here to respect you or your opinion when you have shown yourself to be nothing more than a loser who thinks he’s big stuff because he attacks popular posters.

    You are a petty, small little man and you have some serious issues with your treatment of women.

    Please go back under your rock.

15. #516
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, wighttrasch said:

    JDeaux–I think, but maybe it’s just me, that undresiege is female.

16. #517
    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, undresiege said:

    Rememebr this?

    Now, would you kindly leave me alone as you have nada I want to hear.

    Sigh,

    On February 13th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, undresiege said:
    Sorry soapbox, I guess I mistook this as a lame attempt at humor.

    That was my sarcastic response while calling you on your spit.

    Apology accepted

    That was your sarcastic response.

    4. The comment was a sarcastic comment with little chance of their “wish” coming true.

    Sarcastic comment/lame joke, why play the semantics game with you? My bad, you’re playing games.

    You didn’t give a crap about the airplane crash stuff until things started getting a little “hot”, and other conservatives started condemning it. Then you made your weak little, “everybody has a right to be stupid”. You only lead the charge when it’s LGM and one of his posts, or god forbid he refuses to wish MM a happy frickin holiday.

    Look, catdaddy, I forgot about that whole deal until you raised the issue again, by talking about “prayer for crash/death” stuff being deleted without the whole dang context. You started up today with me dude.

    I’m in my 30s, and it looks like you’re in your 50s. This looks stupid in print. I think you’re a disingenuous little coward, and you think I’m a general, crude jerk, and whatever else. I’m fine with all that.

    For someone who cries about TOS,

    See what I mean. I don’t care too much about the TOS. If I’m booted I’m booted, whatever. You know I’m mocking the others who cry about TOS.

    Wahhhhhhhhhh. Get it?

    Nevermind.

    Oh yeah I’m a day late but,

    Happy Mardi Gras Michelle.

17. #518
    On February 25th, 2009 at 5:01 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    That was my sarcastic response while calling you on your spit.

    What is it with you and spit?

    Apology accepted

    That was your sarcastic response.

    Good lord. No, I was being sincere.

    I’m in my 30s, and it looks like you’re in your 50s. This looks stupid in print. I think you’re a disingenuous little coward, and you think I’m a general, crude jerk, and whatever else.

    WOW, get a life. Now I am the one calling you names? Where? Because I thought “skidmark” was funny? It is funny like when I am called “suds” and I have been and laughed.

    Are you sure you are in your 30’s because you come off like you are 12.

    Yes, you are a day late and a dollar short.

    I still feel bad for you. This is the best you have to offer. WOW.

    Coward – LOL! New one for me to wear. Right up there with racist and bigot.

    Come on, you can do better than coward.

18. #519
    On February 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pm, sonofdy said:

    JDeaux–I think, but maybe it’s just me, that undresiege is female.

    And? Women can be downright dirty in a fight.

19. #520
    On February 25th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, wighttrasch said:

    sonofdy–that’s my point.

20. #521
    On February 25th, 2009 at 5:30 pm, undresiege said:

    509 and 510:

    I’m not opposed to women, uggcoghermmm, going at it, but sorry fellasorladies?, it ain’t that kind of party.

    Em brings out the verbal Axel Rose or Chris Brown in me.

21. #522
    On February 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, undresiege said:

    if we’re calling typing “verbal”.

    Screw it.

22. #523
    On February 25th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, John Deaux said:

    On February 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, wighttrasch said:
    JDeaux–I think, but maybe it’s just me, that undresiege is female.

    Oooooooh. I see.
    So not only is she jealous of Soap for his good deeds, but is also jealous of Emjem because she is outspoken.

    undresiege, why don’t you try playing nice and you’ll find that people will actually appreciate your contributions. Besides, positive attention is much better than negative attention.

23. #524
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:38 pm, emjem24 said:

    undresiege said #503:

    emjemOakley:

    I’m “mocking” now.

    Not the best way to start an apology but I’m not surprised. Reign in the rage! Is that mocking enough for you?

    You are a dog good person. You jumped on the board and started trying to point out what all the liberals were doing wrong in their postings challenged me about my point of view and I couldn’t handle it. YOU IGNORED didn’t defend or support THE 3 SHOT POLITICIANS POSTS UNTIL I CALLED YOU ON IT used it as a convenient excuse to bully you. I mocked insulted you as the female guard dog of the blog. Now if the word dog offends debases you because of some old high school demons in which the fellas “mocked” your looks, well that’s not my concern I’m confident in my ignorance.

    I know that is what you really wanted to say to me. Really!

    I remember reading this blog leading up to the election,and that nyk chick was receiving all types of racial taunts. Conservatives like AlohaGuy called the taunters to the carpet. What did you do? You defended the racial taunts, “though not agreeing with them”.

    Please find some proof that I defended or supported such taunts. It is one thing to defend freedom of speech yet another to support racial taunts. Since I have no control over others’ opinons there’s not much I can do about it. You might want to take a look at what nyk and her best buddy mistressjustice (is that you?) have said to other posters.

    You’re always on this blog trying to point out the supposed “problems” in the posts of liberals. When I joined here, I figured “this stupid beast better not start up with me on a personal level”.

    And it’s a 24/7 pursuit let me tell ya. Yet, you think that you can come on a conservative blog and never be challenged, right? I wish conservatives felt the same kind of treatment on Kos Kids and Huff n’ Puff like you envision for yourself. And how did I start up with you on a personal level? Ohhhhh…. it’s the underwear comment because now you have some personal attachment to your username, right? Nice touch with the whole “stupid beast” comment. I’m sure Michelle Malkin would approve.

    Low and behold, you come up with “underwear”. That’s fine. Unoriginal and juvenile, but that’s fine “mocking”. I in turn mock your dog qualities. Obviously, the whole “dog” thing hits you on a certain level. I didn’t expect a whole meme out of it, but so it goes. Don’t play that, but I’m a lady crap. I believe in equality of the sexes, and you miss are a dog.

    I don’t think mocking your username is the same as calling a poster a “female dog.” Again, please point out why I would expect to be called a “female dog” by anyone. I think when someone calls any woman a “female dog” they should be called out for it. And not even an internet bully like yourself will get away with it.

    You can talk about your projection and other psychobabble and I smile. You’re no Dr. Phil, but that won’t stop you from stroking your on false sense of superiority. It doesn’t matter. You don’t matter. Again, the “mocking” can go on as long as you like. I’ll be underwear, and you can be the filthy dog.

    What you said was the most transparent bit of projection and psychobabble I’ve ever seen (and I’ve seen it with Rusty). So don’t give me that crap. I’m not the sort who feels superior in calling someone a “female dog” so I can only deduct that, again, you’re projecting. For such a tolerant liberal, you really do indulge your hate on a blog in which you think you shouldn’t be challenged like conservatives are on liberal blogs.

    Redneck to redneck, I’ll never show you any respect. I will ignore you, if you ignore me. If you wanna play the “mocking” game, I’ll make you my dog all day.

    I think this is the weakest bit I’ve ever heard…. the whole personal identification thing. You’re a “fine” piece of work who doesn’t belong, not only on this blog, but in civilized company. I will not ignore you until you apologize, which isn’t likely to happen before you’re eventually booted. I’m not a “redneck” and I’m not your dog. I am my own person and I will not tolerate you demeaning me or my reputation.

    I did not do anything to deserve this which leads me to believe the following:

    1. You are a formerly booted liberal trying to get his kicks off of internet bullying.

    2. I (or another unfortunate conservative) somehow have personally “wronged” you in real life which I can’t imagine since my friends and I air our grievances pretty readily.

    3. A new resident liberal taking one for the “team” by dehumizing a conservative until they’re no longer even a person.

    The level of personal venom you display is just way over the top. It actually borders on “unhinged” behavior… not the type of behavior that will last long on a blog like Michelle’s. You could have engaged me in a way that didn’t include calling me a “female dog” or other wonderful names and you know it. You think you can get away with it.

24. #525
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:57 pm, emjem24 said:

    Soap, John Deax, Sonofdy, Wightrasch and anyone else I may have forgotten:

    Thanks for watching my back. I appreciate it.

25. #526
    On February 26th, 2009 at 11:57 pm, emjem24 said:

    undresiege said:

    I’m in my 30s, and it looks like you’re in your 50s. This looks stupid in print. I think you’re a disingenuous little coward, and you think I’m a general, crude jerk, and whatever else. I’m fine with all that.

    Said by the same person who hides behind his computer and who attacks/threatens a female poster for the crime of “mocking”/challenging you and your opinions. I guess I’m not really surprised you’re comfortable with being a jerk.

    I’ve met both in the online and real world, men in their 30’s who were gentlemen, and they never would call a woman a “female dog.” Ever. So what is your excuse?

    Is it because you feel “safe” behind your computer? Do you feel like any woman who challenges you deserves the kind of treatment you gave me? You believe in equaliy of the sexes as long as conservative women (or is that women in general) know their place and don’t challenge you.

    You’re living in never never land if you think that such behavior would fly both in the online and real world. Have fun convincing yourself that you’re not the same hypocrite you accuse me and others of being.

    Stay classy.

26. #527
    On February 27th, 2009 at 9:54 am, wighttrasch said:

    emjem; I can’t believe undresiege won’t pop in for the last word. It’ll go something like this:

    blah blah blah must’ve been beaten up as a teenager blah blah blah and if you act like a pig I’ll call you a pig blah blah really? yada yada meth-cooking blah blah did I touch a nerve? blah yada that’s just silly…whatever yada blah yada I’m outta here …