<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fairness Doctrine on the Senate floor; Update: DeMint bill passes 87-11, but so does Durbin&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:26:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An insider look at the Obama campaign - we’re really screwed! &#124; Driving the Left Loony -The Bobo Files</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-643856</link>
		<dc:creator>An insider look at the Obama campaign - we’re really screwed! &#124; Driving the Left Loony -The Bobo Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-643856</guid>
		<description>[...] not brining up the Fairness Doctrine again - the fact is - he has several Congressmen and Senators drafting legislation right now.  Only - they aren&#8217;t going to call it the Fairness Doctrine - it&#8217;s a backdoor attempt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not brining up the Fairness Doctrine again &#8211; the fact is &#8211; he has several Congressmen and Senators drafting legislation right now.  Only &#8211; they aren&#8217;t going to call it the Fairness Doctrine &#8211; it&#8217;s a backdoor attempt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An insider look at the Obama campaign - we&#8217;re really screwed! &#124; The BoBo Files</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-643846</link>
		<dc:creator>An insider look at the Obama campaign - we&#8217;re really screwed! &#124; The BoBo Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-643846</guid>
		<description>[...] not brining up the Fairness Doctrine again - the fact is - he has several Congressmen and Senators drafting legislation right now.  Only - they aren&#8217;t going to call it the Fairness Doctrine - it&#8217;s a backdoor attempt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not brining up the Fairness Doctrine again &#8211; the fact is &#8211; he has several Congressmen and Senators drafting legislation right now.  Only &#8211; they aren&#8217;t going to call it the Fairness Doctrine &#8211; it&#8217;s a backdoor attempt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inhofe: Senate Democrat Amendment Threatens Christian Radio</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-639365</link>
		<dc:creator>Inhofe: Senate Democrat Amendment Threatens Christian Radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-639365</guid>
		<description>[...] that Sen. Jim DeMint&#8217;s effort to force an up-or-down vote on the Fairness Doctrine issue, which passed 87-11 in the Senate, was a good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Sen. Jim DeMint&#8217;s effort to force an up-or-down vote on the Fairness Doctrine issue, which passed 87-11 in the Senate, was a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inhofe: Senate Democrat Amendment Threatens Christian Radio &#124; Latest Technology News - Business News And Expert Advice</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-639223</link>
		<dc:creator>Inhofe: Senate Democrat Amendment Threatens Christian Radio &#124; Latest Technology News - Business News And Expert Advice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-639223</guid>
		<description>[...] that Sen. Jim DeMint&#8217;s effort to force an up-or-down vote on the Fairness Doctrine issue, which passed 87-11 in the Senate, was a good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that Sen. Jim DeMint&#8217;s effort to force an up-or-down vote on the Fairness Doctrine issue, which passed 87-11 in the Senate, was a good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: painfultruth.org &#187; Fairness Doctrine Dead?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-636468</link>
		<dc:creator>painfultruth.org &#187; Fairness Doctrine Dead?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-636468</guid>
		<description>[...] here.   Tagged with: [ fairness doctrine ]   You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here.   Tagged with: [ fairness doctrine ]   You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin » Fairness Doctrine on the Senate floor; Update: DeMint bill passes 87-11, but so does Durbin’s &#124; Right Wing Popcorn</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-636444</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin » Fairness Doctrine on the Senate floor; Update: DeMint bill passes 87-11, but so does Durbin’s &#124; Right Wing Popcorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-636444</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin » Fairness Doctrine on the Senate floor. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin » Fairness Doctrine on the Senate floor. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Straight_Talk_Luigi</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-636423</link>
		<dc:creator>Straight_Talk_Luigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-636423</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals. Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If liberals knew how to manage a budget and would not put their dopey ideology of &quot;progress&quot; above that of journalistic integrity, they would not be in the mess they are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals. Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.</p></blockquote>
<p>If liberals knew how to manage a budget and would not put their dopey ideology of &#8220;progress&#8221; above that of journalistic integrity, they would not be in the mess they are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-636182</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 00:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-636182</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On February 28th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, lgm said:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Salt said (#113):

    Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes? Be honest. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals. Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That&#039;s your opinion and it skirts the question.  By contrast, Air America did poorly, even in a liberal market.

So, I ask again: Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcome?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On February 28th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, lgm said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Salt said (#113):</p>
<p>    Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes? Be honest. </p></blockquote>
<p>In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals. Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s your opinion and it skirts the question.  By contrast, Air America did poorly, even in a liberal market.</p>
<p>So, I ask again: Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcome?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-636056</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-636056</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt; Salt&lt;/strong&gt; said (#113):

&lt;blockquote&gt;Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes? Be honest.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals.  Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> Salt</strong> said (#113):</p>
<blockquote><p>Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes? Be honest.
</p></blockquote>
<p>In media, equal opportunity is best for liberals.  Put Hannity in a fair debate with Maddow, and Hannity will be exposed for the fraud he is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FAIRNESS DOCTRINE AKA CENSORSHIP DOCTRINE &#171; Dianej&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635806</link>
		<dc:creator>FAIRNESS DOCTRINE AKA CENSORSHIP DOCTRINE &#171; Dianej&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635806</guid>
		<description>[...] http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elephant Owners &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Democratic Senators Startthe ball rolling</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635282</link>
		<dc:creator>Elephant Owners &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Democratic Senators Startthe ball rolling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635282</guid>
		<description>[...] Durbin&#8217;s amendment to FCC legislation says (Hat tip to Michelle Malkin) To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Durbin&#8217;s amendment to FCC legislation says (Hat tip to Michelle Malkin) To encourage and promote diversity in communication media ownership, and to ensure that the public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTater</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635184</link>
		<dc:creator>RTater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635184</guid>
		<description>Laree - You sure were right.  The Turban Durbin amendment passed, backdoor &quot;fairness&quot; doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laree &#8211; You sure were right.  The Turban Durbin amendment passed, backdoor &#8220;fairness&#8221; doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635162</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635162</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On February 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am, lgm said:

I think you have it backwards. The fairness doctrine (not the fair doctrine) is that media using public airwaves should not be allowed to favor one or the other political party. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes, lgm?  Be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On February 27th, 2009 at 9:58 am, lgm said:</p>
<p>I think you have it backwards. The fairness doctrine (not the fair doctrine) is that media using public airwaves should not be allowed to favor one or the other political party.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Do you want equal opportunity or equal outcomes, lgm?  Be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635116</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635116</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;garydt&lt;/strong&gt; (#107)

I think you have it backwards.  The &lt;em&gt;fairness&lt;/em&gt; doctrine (not the fair doctrine) is that media using public airwaves should not be allowed to favor one or the other political party.  If they have a show bashing Democrats, they should have an equal show bashing Republicans.  This applies to broadcast media only, not cable and not print or internet.  

That means TV (not cable) and radio.  The radio part was dropped maybe 20 years ago.  This made is possible for Republican hatemongers like Limbaugh to make a profit trashing America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>garydt</strong> (#107)</p>
<p>I think you have it backwards.  The <em>fairness</em> doctrine (not the fair doctrine) is that media using public airwaves should not be allowed to favor one or the other political party.  If they have a show bashing Democrats, they should have an equal show bashing Republicans.  This applies to broadcast media only, not cable and not print or internet.  </p>
<p>That means TV (not cable) and radio.  The radio part was dropped maybe 20 years ago.  This made is possible for Republican hatemongers like Limbaugh to make a profit trashing America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theodore's World</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/26/fairness-doctrine-on-the-senate-floor/comment-page-2/#comment-635017</link>
		<dc:creator>Theodore's World</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=23864#comment-635017</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Fairness Doctrine on Senate Floor...&lt;/strong&gt;

Jim DeMint for his efforts and for the ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fairness Doctrine on Senate Floor&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Jim DeMint for his efforts and for the &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
