See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

1. The “Dating a Banker Anonymous” Girls punk the New York Obama Times! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!

Trackback URL

Comments

1. #633871
   On February 26th, 2009 at 8:52 am, cpodug said:

   But – they’re like “professionals,” don’tcha know? They don’t make mistakes – only conservative bloggers do that!

2. #633872
   On February 26th, 2009 at 8:53 am, seveneleventy said:

   The Onion has more credibility regarding current news than the NYT. Pathetic!

3. #633874
   On February 26th, 2009 at 8:54 am, Insomniac said:

   But…they have layers upon layers of editorial scrutiny!

4. #633879
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:00 am, jangar said:

   The Times needs to be reduced to 50 cents and relocated with the rest of the $#^! at the checkout counter.

5. #633880
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:01 am, conservativesRus said:

   I feel sorry for a “journalism” major. They apparently don’t learn much. Journalism used to be something akin to “getting the facts and reporting them”. Now journalism apparently is the “art of using words to craft an opinion”.
   Somewhere along the line, we went from telling the audience the details, and the audience figuring out what to think about it, to the present mode of not even bothering to tell us the details, only telling us what to think.
   Just watch any major speech. Almost every program will spend more time playing the talking heads telling us what to think compared to re-playing the actual speech.

6. #633881
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:03 am, ajmontana said:

   What’s a New York Times?

7. #633882
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:03 am, txvet2 said:

   On February 26th, 2009 at 8:54 am, Insomniac said:

   But…they have layers upon layers of editorial scrutiny!

   You’re thinking of the old days, when they did actual, you know, reporting.

8. #633884
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:07 am, zyzzyg said:

   Mon Dieu!

   NYT gets it wrong. It isn’t the first time, and it won’t be the last.

   Anyone remember Judith Miller?

   I wonder if there is any news organization that has never issued a retraction?

9. #633885
   On February 26th, 2009 at 9:07 am, pueblo1032 said:

   Absolutely PRICELESS!!! WOODWARD and BERNSTEIN must be FALLING off their PENNY LOAFERS over this!!!!

10. #633891
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:09 am, iamsaved said:

    The NYT is quickly on its way out because their liberal, treasonous editorials that they feel passes for journalistic, investigative news stories are not wanted by the paying public. They have no credibility.

    In the words of Margaret Hamilton in the Wizard of Oz – “I’m melting, I’m melting, Oh what a world, what a world”

11. #633903
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:19 am, ITookTheRedPill said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:01 am, conservativesRus said:

    Journalism used to be something akin to “getting the facts and reporting them”.

    By that definition, there is no better journalist than Michelle Malkin.
    She seriously deserves a Pulitzer Prize.

12. #633913
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:28 am, jangar said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:03 am, ajmontana said:
    What’s a New York Times?

    It’s that sludge that gets caught in the p-trap of your wastewater line and causes your toilet to back up and overflow, leading to a phone call to roto-rooter.

13. #633914
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:29 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Are there any colleges teaching the old style journalism?

14. #633916
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:30 am, EWTHeckman said:

    When you don’t have a working familiarity with truth, it becomes impossible to separate it from fiction.

    Or put another way, if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything.

15. #633917
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:30 am, Kevin K. said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:03 am, ajmontana said: (#6)

    What’s a New York Times?

    Nice. They are certainly not the paper that I used to read way back when I was in college.

    ————
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:07 am, pueblo1032 said: (#9)

    …FALLING off their PENNY LOAFERS over this!!!!

    Hey! Easy on penny loafers. One of the best styles of shoe ever made–comfortable and practical and suitable almost anytime/anywhere.

16. #633920
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:31 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    The NYT is dying and they have not come to grips.

    [Creasy has rectally inserted a five minute time bomb into Fuentes]
    Fuentes: A last wish, please, please. Please.
    Creasy: Last wish? I wish you had more time.

17. #633926
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:33 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:07 am, pueblo1032 said: (#9)

    …FALLING off their PENNY LOAFERS over this!!!!
    Hey! Easy on penny loafers. One of the best styles of shoe ever made–comfortable and practical and suitable almost anytime/anywhere.

    Too bad nobody is going to have enough change to put the pennies in them.

18. #633930
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:34 am, jangar said:

    Too bad nobody is going to have enough change to put the pennies in them.

    Try Pesos.

19. #633935
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:35 am, sonofdy said:

    Well it is far more important to expose soldiers on secrect missions than to fact check.

20. #633938
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:37 am, jangar said:

    And it is far more important to puff TheOne also.

21. #633956
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:45 am, cabrerski said:

    …but who will be there to spread the Word of the One? Wanna bet that the NYT and WaPo get bailouts. Wait, I’ll even give odds…

22. #633970
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:52 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    “Dating a Banker Anonymous,

    Made my morning!

23. #633975
    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:56 am, luckydogg said:

    When our two Huskies were puppies, we would put the NYT down on the floor so they could read it….They would get a funny look on their faces, leave a pile, then walk away. As they were leaving, I swear, I would see smiles on their faces. I think they liked it!

24. #633997
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:02 am, lgm said:

    Distinguish between the airhead filler articles about girlfriends of bankers and the actual news. The NYTimes gets that right much better than its competitors. For example, last week the Washington Post ran an Op/Ed by George Will stating that a large study had found no retreat of sea ice. That group then put out a statement saying their study had found huge retreats of sea ice. No retraction or correction yet from the Post. Isn’t global warming more important than bankers’ girlfriends?

25. #634006
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:08 am, Misscheryl said:

    Hey! Easy on penny loafers. One of the best styles of shoe ever made–comfortable and practical and suitable almost anytime/anywhere.

    Ditto on that and almost as cool as saddle oxfords – my personal favorite.

26. #634044
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:22 am, conservativesRus said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:02 am, lgm said:
    Isn’t global warming more important than bankers’ girlfriends?

    Since man made global warming is at most an opinion, I’d say it’s not very important.
    On the other hand, since “global warming” is being used to gain power/control/wealth, it is important – not to “solve” but rather to defuse.

27. #634052
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:27 am, jangar said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:02 am, lgm said:

    Are you not curious enough about global warming to do some independent research on your own rather than believe every liberal point of view on the topic?

    Point being…you don’t value any other point of view that does not fit your own.

28. #634069
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:33 am, jangar said:

    lgm: “I am a GoreBot…take me to your leader”*

    *Batteries not included.

29. #634092
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:44 am, cabrerski said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:33 am, jangar said:
    *Batteries not included.

    That’s because they are only solar- and/or wind-powered. Or, in the case of the Goreacle, fed by heat from the hot air he spews forth.

30. #634102
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:48 am, happyscrapper said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:09 am, iamsaved said:

    In the words of Margaret Hamilton in the Wizard of Oz – “I’m melting, I’m melting, Oh what a world, what a world”

    Don’t you mean, “In the words of Helen Thomas?”

31. #634105
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:52 am, happyscrapper said:

    There is no good journalism any more! Not on TV, not in newspapers, not on radio. There is good jounalism on some blogs like Michelle’s, but there are a lot more blogs that are just plain crap. Most so called “journalism” is “opinion” and needs to be reported as such, not as hard news. Michelle gives her opinion, but backs it up with facts. She digs deep and finds the truth. I don’t even trust FOX News to get it right. We just have to take things with a grain of salt until verified.

32. #634113
    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:57 am, cabrerski said:

    ’scrapper…

    Amen!

33. #634202
    On February 26th, 2009 at 11:41 am, Dave Turson said:

    The credentialed professionals at the Fishwrap of Record fall for a blindingly obvious hoax.

    The writer of the NY Times piece sees all things as a good liberal should, so naturally the editors would love him and give him a pass. Here’s an article he wrote praising Obama’s loose-living, free-wheeling style as something that will be good for the country– while comparing Bush to Hitler because he tried to “live clean.”

34. #634214
    On February 26th, 2009 at 11:47 am, DBNinKY said:

    No retraction or correction yet from the Post.

    None required – the group merely issued a disclaimer; also, although both publications are on borrowed time, the Post will outlast the NYT by a decade or so.
    

    Isn’t global warming more important than bankers’ girlfriends?

    No. The latter is fact, the former fiction.

35. #634225
    On February 26th, 2009 at 11:53 am, scituate_tgr said:

    The Onion has more credibility regarding current news than the NYT. Pathetic!

    Spongebob Squarepants has more credibility regarding current news than the NYT.

36. #634237
    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Spongebob Squarepants has more credibility regarding current news than the NYT.

    Yeah, even Helen Thomas has more credibility.

37. #634244
    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:04 pm, conservativesRus said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Yeah, even Helen Thomas has more credibility.

    I think I might question that extreme position.
    Two times zero is still zero.

38. #634273
    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, cabrerski said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Yeah, even Helen Thomas has more credibility.

    Yeah, let’s not exaggerate too much…

39. #634275
    On February 26th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, Salt said:

    On February 26th, 2009 at 10:02 am, lgm said:

    …Op/Ed by George Will stating that a large study had found no retreat of sea ice. That group then put out a statement saying their study had found huge retreats of sea ice.

    Are you aware that the satellite sensor run by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) which measures ice was degraded and underestimated the total arctic sea ice by 193,000 square miles?

    Where is the NYTimes story on that?

    Of course, missing these stories is not all that unusual considering that while they were harping on arctic ice in ‘07, they “missed” the fact that Antarctic ice was at its highest point recorded.

    To use an OP/ED piece to prove that the NYTimes “news” is better is a joke, right?

40. #638083
    On March 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 pm, Tuesday said:

    Amen to that! News reports nowadays = opinion pieces. Opinions expressed are not even their own. Since they bought into the Leftist agenda, they echo the Leftist views.

    On February 26th, 2009 at 9:01 am, conservativesRus said:
    I feel sorry for a “journalism” major. They apparently don’t learn much. Journalism used to be something akin to “getting the facts and reporting them”. Now journalism apparently is the “art of using words to craft an opinion”.
    Somewhere along the line, we went from telling the audience the details, and the audience figuring out what to think about it, to the present mode of not even bothering to tell us the details, only telling us what to think.
    Just watch any major speech. Almost every program will spend more time playing the talking heads telling us what to think compared to re-playing the actual speech.

    Now, when it is very important that the WH occupant’s authoritarian grab of power (abetted by Congress) get exposed for what it is, the “journalists” are just regurgitating his talking points!