<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: C-SPAN, CPAC, Jindal Derangement Syndrome &amp; more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: free work at home jobs</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1247884</link>
		<dc:creator>free work at home jobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 12:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1247884</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gems form the internet...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gems form the internet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flv player</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1245716</link>
		<dc:creator>flv player</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1245716</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wedding photography</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1245430</link>
		<dc:creator>wedding photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1245430</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: property insurance</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1245395</link>
		<dc:creator>property insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1245395</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Article…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Article…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who won the Academy Awards Best Actor</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1198023</link>
		<dc:creator>Who won the Academy Awards Best Actor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1198023</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sites we Like…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sites we Like…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Every once in a while we choose blogs that we read. Listed below are the latest sites that we choose [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook123</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-2/#comment-1184081</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-1184081</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gems form the internet...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gems form the internet&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Galtslist.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-675281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Galtslist.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-675281</guid>
		<description>[...] did the hilarious Chuck &#8220;Let the eat pork&#8221; Schumer photoshop last month that has popped up at some of the Tea Party protests. (Tennyson is also the mastermind behind SNOBama.) In addition to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did the hilarious Chuck &#8220;Let the eat pork&#8221; Schumer photoshop last month that has popped up at some of the Tea Party protests. (Tennyson is also the mastermind behind SNOBama.) In addition to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-637546</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-637546</guid>
		<description>Hey Nesting Hawk...I see you decided to take on the Village idiot.  If you would like, I can get you a nice, soft cushion made from the same foam they make those soft mattresses out of.  I figure it would be better for you when you start banging your head against the wall trying to figure out just how anyone can possibly be as stupid and uninformed as LGM and still remember to breathe.  Just remember, he is lucky it is an involuntary reaction caused by CO2...it&#039;s the only thing that keeps him alive.

I just wish that they would finally instill the law which forces teachers to take regular tests to prove they are educated and informed enough to be teaching.

If they ever do, poor LGM will be out of a job, and there would be some 35+ students annually that would finally be getting a real education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nesting Hawk&#8230;I see you decided to take on the Village idiot.  If you would like, I can get you a nice, soft cushion made from the same foam they make those soft mattresses out of.  I figure it would be better for you when you start banging your head against the wall trying to figure out just how anyone can possibly be as stupid and uninformed as LGM and still remember to breathe.  Just remember, he is lucky it is an involuntary reaction caused by CO2&#8230;it&#8217;s the only thing that keeps him alive.</p>
<p>I just wish that they would finally instill the law which forces teachers to take regular tests to prove they are educated and informed enough to be teaching.</p>
<p>If they ever do, poor LGM will be out of a job, and there would be some 35+ students annually that would finally be getting a real education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636473</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636473</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Therefore, while our budget will run deficits, we must begin the process of making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline; cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office, and put our nation on sound fiscal footing,”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What Obama didn&#039;t say is that he&#039;s tripling the deficit to 1752 billion this year. It&#039;s not hard to figure out that the numbers are misleading; triple, then cut in half. I also see that he has decided he&#039;ll be President for a 2nd term, maybe more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Therefore, while our budget will run deficits, we must begin the process of making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline; cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office, and put our nation on sound fiscal footing,”</p></blockquote>
<p>What Obama didn&#8217;t say is that he&#8217;s tripling the deficit to 1752 billion this year. It&#8217;s not hard to figure out that the numbers are misleading; triple, then cut in half. I also see that he has decided he&#8217;ll be President for a 2nd term, maybe more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEST YOUR BIAS: Meet Rush Limbaugh &#171; AMERICA TIMES</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636466</link>
		<dc:creator>TEST YOUR BIAS: Meet Rush Limbaugh &#171; AMERICA TIMES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636466</guid>
		<description>[...] read: ● Do you hate Rush Limbaugh? ● Top 10 anti-Obama conservatives (Hat tip: MichelleMalkin) ● Rush talked about the Leftist tactic of destroying reputations: CNN after Rush&#8217;s speech: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read: ● Do you hate Rush Limbaugh? ● Top 10 anti-Obama conservatives (Hat tip: MichelleMalkin) ● Rush talked about the Leftist tactic of destroying reputations: CNN after Rush&#8217;s speech: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636424</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636424</guid>
		<description>lgm: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;She bought them off, literally. She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax. But that didn’t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Would enjoy links to both Palin imposing windfall profits tax and Palin railing against windfall profits tax. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have absolutely no problem with Reagan railing against budget deficits, as he did try to cut government and lower taxes, I believe, and that is exactly the way to cut budget deficits. Bush was a big-government Republican so you have a slightly better case, but at least he cut taxes. 
How do you feel about Obama hiking up the deficit the way he has? He&#039;s expanded the government more than Bush did already, and is unlikely to make real tax cuts and thus to stimulate the economy and essentially expand the tax base. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I haven&#039;t been on the scene long enough to know about what went on with Gingrich and DeLay, but remember being unsure as to what DeLay did. How do you feel about the bills coming out now that are so very infested with earmarks, and the politicians-Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and so on-promoting them and even rushing them through?
How do you feel about McCain&#039;s record with Citizens Against Government Waste?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Would enjoy link to a report or reports from an organization you like that you feel is well-balanced. Would also enjoy link to something from Fox you feel is an example of bias.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
You can do it and rail against it a the same time&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like Obama and racism? (See Jeremiah Wright and also the bit about the inauguration rapper.) Like Obama or Pelosi and lack of government transparency? (The fast and silent way these omnibus bills have been going through.) 

Incidentally, I was looking for links to articles regarding Palin&#039;s initial run for governor of Alaska, especially about the corruption of the previous governor or whatever was going on there, but of course everything I get is from her VP run. Anyone have a good linkable source? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgm: </p>
<blockquote><p>She bought them off, literally. She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax. But that didn’t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes. </p></blockquote>
<p>Would enjoy links to both Palin imposing windfall profits tax and Palin railing against windfall profits tax. </p>
<blockquote><p>
As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p></blockquote>
<p>I have absolutely no problem with Reagan railing against budget deficits, as he did try to cut government and lower taxes, I believe, and that is exactly the way to cut budget deficits. Bush was a big-government Republican so you have a slightly better case, but at least he cut taxes.<br />
How do you feel about Obama hiking up the deficit the way he has? He&#8217;s expanded the government more than Bush did already, and is unlikely to make real tax cuts and thus to stimulate the economy and essentially expand the tax base. </p>
<blockquote><p>
As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been on the scene long enough to know about what went on with Gingrich and DeLay, but remember being unsure as to what DeLay did. How do you feel about the bills coming out now that are so very infested with earmarks, and the politicians-Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and so on-promoting them and even rushing them through?<br />
How do you feel about McCain&#8217;s record with Citizens Against Government Waste?</p>
<blockquote><p>
As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p></blockquote>
<p>Would enjoy link to a report or reports from an organization you like that you feel is well-balanced. Would also enjoy link to something from Fox you feel is an example of bias.</p>
<blockquote><p>
You can do it and rail against it a the same time</p></blockquote>
<p>Like Obama and racism? (See Jeremiah Wright and also the bit about the inauguration rapper.) Like Obama or Pelosi and lack of government transparency? (The fast and silent way these omnibus bills have been going through.) </p>
<p>Incidentally, I was looking for links to articles regarding Palin&#8217;s initial run for governor of Alaska, especially about the corruption of the previous governor or whatever was going on there, but of course everything I get is from her VP run. Anyone have a good linkable source? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildcatter1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636415</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildcatter1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636415</guid>
		<description>Another new sig line:

Chuck-u Schumer to mainstream America - &quot;Let &#039;em eat pork.&quot;

Then, there is:

Liberty: All the stimulus we need.

And, of course:

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we&#039;ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price. - Ronald Reagan from his first inaugural address</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another new sig line:</p>
<p>Chuck-u Schumer to mainstream America &#8211; &#8220;Let &#8216;em eat pork.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then, there is:</p>
<p>Liberty: All the stimulus we need.</p>
<p>And, of course:</p>
<p>In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we&#8217;ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price. &#8211; Ronald Reagan from his first inaugural address</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636400</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636400</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 1st, 2009 at 4:01 pm, lgm said: 

As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits

As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks

As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting&lt;/blockquote&gt;That is one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on MM&#039;s blogs.  Really!   Hahahahahaha!  budget deficits??  Earmarks?? One-sided reporting???  Hahahahahaha!  Sorry, I can&#039;t stop.  You are really good!  You should go on the Bill Maher show or take your comedy routine to The View.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 1st, 2009 at 4:01 pm, lgm said: </p>
<p>As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p>
<p>As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p>
<p>As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p></blockquote>
<p>That is one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on MM&#8217;s blogs.  Really!   Hahahahahaha!  budget deficits??  Earmarks?? One-sided reporting???  Hahahahahaha!  Sorry, I can&#8217;t stop.  You are really good!  You should go on the Bill Maher show or take your comedy routine to The View.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636397</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636397</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper&lt;/strong&gt; said(#84): 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, and if she is “good for nothing”, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

She bought them off, literally.  She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax.  But that didn&#039;t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes.  

As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits

As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks

As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting

You can do it and rail against it a the same time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper</strong> said(#84): </p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah, and if she is “good for nothing”, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating? </p></blockquote>
<p>She bought them off, literally.  She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax.  But that didn&#8217;t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes.  </p>
<p>As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p>
<p>As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p>
<p>As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p>
<p>You can do it and rail against it a the same time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636392</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636392</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm, RetFireman said: 
Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is “good for nothing”. Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to…doesn’t it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Are you saying lgm exposes himself to women?  Ha!!  No doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm, RetFireman said:<br />
Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is “good for nothing”. Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to…doesn’t it?</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you saying lgm exposes himself to women?  Ha!!  No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

