<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open thread: C-SPAN, CPAC, Jindal Derangement Syndrome &amp; more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:28:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Galtslist.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-675281</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Galtslist.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-675281</guid>
		<description>[...] did the hilarious Chuck &#8220;Let the eat pork&#8221; Schumer photoshop last month that has popped up at some of the Tea Party protests. (Tennyson is also the mastermind behind SNOBama.) In addition to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did the hilarious Chuck &#8220;Let the eat pork&#8221; Schumer photoshop last month that has popped up at some of the Tea Party protests. (Tennyson is also the mastermind behind SNOBama.) In addition to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-637546</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 04:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-637546</guid>
		<description>Hey Nesting Hawk...I see you decided to take on the Village idiot.  If you would like, I can get you a nice, soft cushion made from the same foam they make those soft mattresses out of.  I figure it would be better for you when you start banging your head against the wall trying to figure out just how anyone can possibly be as stupid and uninformed as LGM and still remember to breathe.  Just remember, he is lucky it is an involuntary reaction caused by CO2...it&#039;s the only thing that keeps him alive.

I just wish that they would finally instill the law which forces teachers to take regular tests to prove they are educated and informed enough to be teaching.

If they ever do, poor LGM will be out of a job, and there would be some 35+ students annually that would finally be getting a real education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nesting Hawk&#8230;I see you decided to take on the Village idiot.  If you would like, I can get you a nice, soft cushion made from the same foam they make those soft mattresses out of.  I figure it would be better for you when you start banging your head against the wall trying to figure out just how anyone can possibly be as stupid and uninformed as LGM and still remember to breathe.  Just remember, he is lucky it is an involuntary reaction caused by CO2&#8230;it&#8217;s the only thing that keeps him alive.</p>
<p>I just wish that they would finally instill the law which forces teachers to take regular tests to prove they are educated and informed enough to be teaching.</p>
<p>If they ever do, poor LGM will be out of a job, and there would be some 35+ students annually that would finally be getting a real education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graysonret</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636473</link>
		<dc:creator>graysonret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636473</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;“Therefore, while our budget will run deficits, we must begin the process of making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline; cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office, and put our nation on sound fiscal footing,”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

What Obama didn&#039;t say is that he&#039;s tripling the deficit to 1752 billion this year. It&#039;s not hard to figure out that the numbers are misleading; triple, then cut in half. I also see that he has decided he&#039;ll be President for a 2nd term, maybe more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“Therefore, while our budget will run deficits, we must begin the process of making the tough choices necessary to restore fiscal discipline; cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office, and put our nation on sound fiscal footing,”</p></blockquote>
<p>What Obama didn&#8217;t say is that he&#8217;s tripling the deficit to 1752 billion this year. It&#8217;s not hard to figure out that the numbers are misleading; triple, then cut in half. I also see that he has decided he&#8217;ll be President for a 2nd term, maybe more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TEST YOUR BIAS: Meet Rush Limbaugh &#171; AMERICA TIMES</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636466</link>
		<dc:creator>TEST YOUR BIAS: Meet Rush Limbaugh &#171; AMERICA TIMES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636466</guid>
		<description>[...] read: ● Do you hate Rush Limbaugh? ● Top 10 anti-Obama conservatives (Hat tip: MichelleMalkin) ● Rush talked about the Leftist tactic of destroying reputations: CNN after Rush&#8217;s speech: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read: ● Do you hate Rush Limbaugh? ● Top 10 anti-Obama conservatives (Hat tip: MichelleMalkin) ● Rush talked about the Leftist tactic of destroying reputations: CNN after Rush&#8217;s speech: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636424</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636424</guid>
		<description>lgm: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;She bought them off, literally. She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax. But that didn’t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Would enjoy links to both Palin imposing windfall profits tax and Palin railing against windfall profits tax. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have absolutely no problem with Reagan railing against budget deficits, as he did try to cut government and lower taxes, I believe, and that is exactly the way to cut budget deficits. Bush was a big-government Republican so you have a slightly better case, but at least he cut taxes. 
How do you feel about Obama hiking up the deficit the way he has? He&#039;s expanded the government more than Bush did already, and is unlikely to make real tax cuts and thus to stimulate the economy and essentially expand the tax base. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I haven&#039;t been on the scene long enough to know about what went on with Gingrich and DeLay, but remember being unsure as to what DeLay did. How do you feel about the bills coming out now that are so very infested with earmarks, and the politicians-Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and so on-promoting them and even rushing them through?
How do you feel about McCain&#039;s record with Citizens Against Government Waste?
&lt;blockquote&gt;
As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Would enjoy link to a report or reports from an organization you like that you feel is well-balanced. Would also enjoy link to something from Fox you feel is an example of bias.

&lt;blockquote&gt;
You can do it and rail against it a the same time&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Like Obama and racism? (See Jeremiah Wright and also the bit about the inauguration rapper.) Like Obama or Pelosi and lack of government transparency? (The fast and silent way these omnibus bills have been going through.) 

Incidentally, I was looking for links to articles regarding Palin&#039;s initial run for governor of Alaska, especially about the corruption of the previous governor or whatever was going on there, but of course everything I get is from her VP run. Anyone have a good linkable source? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lgm: </p>
<blockquote><p>She bought them off, literally. She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax. But that didn’t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes. </p></blockquote>
<p>Would enjoy links to both Palin imposing windfall profits tax and Palin railing against windfall profits tax. </p>
<blockquote><p>
As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p></blockquote>
<p>I have absolutely no problem with Reagan railing against budget deficits, as he did try to cut government and lower taxes, I believe, and that is exactly the way to cut budget deficits. Bush was a big-government Republican so you have a slightly better case, but at least he cut taxes.<br />
How do you feel about Obama hiking up the deficit the way he has? He&#8217;s expanded the government more than Bush did already, and is unlikely to make real tax cuts and thus to stimulate the economy and essentially expand the tax base. </p>
<blockquote><p>
As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p></blockquote>
<p>I haven&#8217;t been on the scene long enough to know about what went on with Gingrich and DeLay, but remember being unsure as to what DeLay did. How do you feel about the bills coming out now that are so very infested with earmarks, and the politicians-Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and so on-promoting them and even rushing them through?<br />
How do you feel about McCain&#8217;s record with Citizens Against Government Waste?</p>
<blockquote><p>
As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p></blockquote>
<p>Would enjoy link to a report or reports from an organization you like that you feel is well-balanced. Would also enjoy link to something from Fox you feel is an example of bias.</p>
<blockquote><p>
You can do it and rail against it a the same time</p></blockquote>
<p>Like Obama and racism? (See Jeremiah Wright and also the bit about the inauguration rapper.) Like Obama or Pelosi and lack of government transparency? (The fast and silent way these omnibus bills have been going through.) </p>
<p>Incidentally, I was looking for links to articles regarding Palin&#8217;s initial run for governor of Alaska, especially about the corruption of the previous governor or whatever was going on there, but of course everything I get is from her VP run. Anyone have a good linkable source? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildcatter1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636415</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildcatter1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636415</guid>
		<description>Another new sig line:

Chuck-u Schumer to mainstream America - &quot;Let &#039;em eat pork.&quot;

Then, there is:

Liberty: All the stimulus we need.

And, of course:

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we&#039;ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price. - Ronald Reagan from his first inaugural address</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another new sig line:</p>
<p>Chuck-u Schumer to mainstream America &#8211; &#8220;Let &#8216;em eat pork.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then, there is:</p>
<p>Liberty: All the stimulus we need.</p>
<p>And, of course:</p>
<p>In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we&#8217;ve been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is superior to government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity to govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of government, must bear the burden. The solutions we seek must be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a higher price. &#8211; Ronald Reagan from his first inaugural address</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636400</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636400</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 1st, 2009 at 4:01 pm, lgm said: 

As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits

As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks

As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting&lt;/blockquote&gt;That is one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on MM&#039;s blogs.  Really!   Hahahahahaha!  budget deficits??  Earmarks?? One-sided reporting???  Hahahahahaha!  Sorry, I can&#039;t stop.  You are really good!  You should go on the Bill Maher show or take your comedy routine to The View.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 1st, 2009 at 4:01 pm, lgm said: </p>
<p>As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p>
<p>As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p>
<p>As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p></blockquote>
<p>That is one of the funniest posts I have ever seen on MM&#8217;s blogs.  Really!   Hahahahahaha!  budget deficits??  Earmarks?? One-sided reporting???  Hahahahahaha!  Sorry, I can&#8217;t stop.  You are really good!  You should go on the Bill Maher show or take your comedy routine to The View.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636397</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636397</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper&lt;/strong&gt; said(#84): 

&lt;blockquote&gt;Yeah, and if she is “good for nothing”, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

She bought them off, literally.  She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax.  But that didn&#039;t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes.  

As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits

As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks

As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting

You can do it and rail against it a the same time</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper</strong> said(#84): </p>
<blockquote><p>Yeah, and if she is “good for nothing”, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating? </p></blockquote>
<p>She bought them off, literally.  She imposed a windfall profits tax on Alaska oil companies and distributed the money as a kind of negative tax.  But that didn&#8217;t stop McCain and Palin from railing against windfall profits taxes.  </p>
<p>As Reagan and Bush demonstrated with budget deficits</p>
<p>As Gingrich and Delay showed with earmarks</p>
<p>As Fox demonstrates with one side reporting</p>
<p>You can do it and rail against it a the same time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636392</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636392</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm, RetFireman said: 
Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is “good for nothing”. Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to…doesn’t it?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Are you saying lgm exposes himself to women?  Ha!!  No doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 1st, 2009 at 3:43 pm, RetFireman said:<br />
Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is “good for nothing”. Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to…doesn’t it?</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you saying lgm exposes himself to women?  Ha!!  No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636390</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636390</guid>
		<description>Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is &quot;good for nothing&quot;.  Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to...doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to a tool like LGM to look at a smart, successful, talented, educated woman and think she is &#8220;good for nothing&#8221;.  Says a lot about the types of women he exposes himself to&#8230;doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636381</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636381</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 1st, 2009 at 3:12 pm, NestingHawk said: 
Hey lgm,
Harsh thing to say about Sarah Palin. Why do you dislike her that much, to the extent you would say she is “good for nothing”? I don’t like Obama, Biden, or Pelosi, but I’m sure I could find uses for them if I were Grand Supreme Dictator. Same for Specter, Snow, and on and on. I’d be curious as to some concrete details as to how you formed your opinion of Sarah Palin.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, and if she is &quot;good for nothing&quot;, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating?  Or doesn&#039;t that count because she is Conservative?  I don&#039;t expect an answer from lgm because it swoops and poops a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 1st, 2009 at 3:12 pm, NestingHawk said:<br />
Hey lgm,<br />
Harsh thing to say about Sarah Palin. Why do you dislike her that much, to the extent you would say she is “good for nothing”? I don’t like Obama, Biden, or Pelosi, but I’m sure I could find uses for them if I were Grand Supreme Dictator. Same for Specter, Snow, and on and on. I’d be curious as to some concrete details as to how you formed your opinion of Sarah Palin.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, and if she is &#8220;good for nothing&#8221;, how did she get to be such a successful Governor with a high approval rating?  Or doesn&#8217;t that count because she is Conservative?  I don&#8217;t expect an answer from lgm because it swoops and poops a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NestingHawk</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636380</link>
		<dc:creator>NestingHawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636380</guid>
		<description>Hey lgm, 
  Harsh thing to say about Sarah Palin. Why do you dislike her that much, to the extent you would say she is &quot;good for nothing&quot;? I don&#039;t like Obama, Biden, or Pelosi, but I&#039;m sure I could find uses for them if I were Grand Supreme Dictator. Same for Specter, Snow, and on and on. I&#039;d be curious as to some concrete details as to how you formed your opinion of Sarah Palin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey lgm,<br />
  Harsh thing to say about Sarah Palin. Why do you dislike her that much, to the extent you would say she is &#8220;good for nothing&#8221;? I don&#8217;t like Obama, Biden, or Pelosi, but I&#8217;m sure I could find uses for them if I were Grand Supreme Dictator. Same for Specter, Snow, and on and on. I&#8217;d be curious as to some concrete details as to how you formed your opinion of Sarah Palin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636367</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636367</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On February 28th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said: 
RetFireman: Too many bogus statements to address but I am one of those who voted for Bob Barr. And I would do it again. If the 7 million Republicans who stayed home had done the same, there would now be no claim to an Obama mandate and the Republican Party might have heard the message. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Phil...if everyone who didn&#039;t like John McCain stayed home, then the democrats would be lording it over us that Obama won by a landslide, and the Republican party is through forever.  If those 7 million people who stayed home would have showed up and at least voted for Republican Senators, we wouldn&#039;t be in this mess either!!Seriously, isn&#039;t it better that Odumbo only won by a few percentage points?  It gives us hope that we can pull it out next time.  A staggering defeat would have put millions of well-meaning &quot;on the fencers&quot; into such a dither, they would give up entirely on the Republican party.  Staying home was not cool.  Nor was voting for a third party candidate who had no chance to win, but only diluted the Republican vote and made us look less successful that we probably were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On February 28th, 2009 at 8:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said:<br />
RetFireman: Too many bogus statements to address but I am one of those who voted for Bob Barr. And I would do it again. If the 7 million Republicans who stayed home had done the same, there would now be no claim to an Obama mandate and the Republican Party might have heard the message. </p></blockquote>
<p>Phil&#8230;if everyone who didn&#8217;t like John McCain stayed home, then the democrats would be lording it over us that Obama won by a landslide, and the Republican party is through forever.  If those 7 million people who stayed home would have showed up and at least voted for Republican Senators, we wouldn&#8217;t be in this mess either!!Seriously, isn&#8217;t it better that Odumbo only won by a few percentage points?  It gives us hope that we can pull it out next time.  A staggering defeat would have put millions of well-meaning &#8220;on the fencers&#8221; into such a dither, they would give up entirely on the Republican party.  Staying home was not cool.  Nor was voting for a third party candidate who had no chance to win, but only diluted the Republican vote and made us look less successful that we probably were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: et</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636348</link>
		<dc:creator>et</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636348</guid>
		<description>Check out the Michelle Malkin Rockstar photos and article over on Instapundit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the Michelle Malkin Rockstar photos and article over on Instapundit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/02/27/open-thread-c-span-cpac-jindal-derangement-syndrome-more/comment-page-1/#comment-636347</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24016#comment-636347</guid>
		<description>Al Gore where is all that hot air you promised us? It is snowing in Alabama in March.

http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/al-gore-where-is-that-global-warming.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore where is all that hot air you promised us? It is snowing in Alabama in March.</p>
<p><a href="http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/al-gore-where-is-that-global-warming.html" rel="nofollow">http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/al-gore-where-is-that-global-warming.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
