#36
On March 4th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

…much explained, sir. Thank you for serving Our Country in times past, and Our Constitution now, at the end.
:::::::::::::

#12
On March 4th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, DanGrantTx said:
Here we go again….Dumb and Dumber trying to solve political problems in a “bipartisan” fashion.

Please don’t kid yourself. Even politicians don’t get away manuvering like he does and consistantly win re-election in a mostly Conserv. state. He’s NOT dumb!

Of course, it follows from there that he knows full well what he’s doing, and (for whatever reason) willingly abedding the destruction of our Republic.

I have an odd notion, it sounds slightly tin-hat, but involves turning our monetary system over to the UN & friends, what happens when people (or can w/nations) go bankrupt, and sovernty.

Looking for a good thread to bring it into discussion, bounce it around w/ya’ll.

Just think about these things, please…
Consider if:
(1) Prez Cucuracha is very smart
(2) that he speech-a-fies as Prez o’ Duh Woild
(3) knows exactly where he wants the USA to end up
(4) knows that you don’t tax a faultering economy with taxes that will reduce GDP by 3-5%
(5) Ayers has written that the oldest 3rd of the pop wouldnt be “re-educationable”
(6) he’s moving to take over the Healthcare system.
(7) He knows that if the USA is bankrupt, it will necessitate rationing medcare, at instead of simply at level “cruel” to move to level “inhuman”
(8) is currently doing so many things, so fast, so well co-ordinated that fit together in favour of destruction that they must have been worked out in advance (the bobbles are due to his inexperience…)
(8) is building a brownshirts group that will be the combat equal of the Army.
… thats enough for now.

I started listing these oddities on the Kunsan to McChord leg (19hrs of boredom) and kept up with it.

I now have a couple of pages of these oddities.

—
Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

On March 4th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, rplatt said:

In today’s politics, McCain is completely irrelevant.</blockquote
Among us, yes. But so long as he keeps accommodating the MSM as the “bipartisan” party leader without challenge, he might is still relevant among everyone else. We need new leaders who will crowd him off of the stage. As Rush made clear, that is what Michael Steele should be doing but hasn’t and won’t.

On March 4th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

I really wonder if the country would be any better run is this Manchurian Candidate had won.

Consider this: the carbon credit section of Obama’s budget used to be known as the McCain-Leiberman Bill.

Also, McCain was an enthusiastic supporter of TARP.

Also, McCain was on ABC News a couple of nights ago stating “Obama is off to an excellent start.”

Finally, do you think every single House Republicans would have voted against the Obama McCain Porkulus I, Porkulus II and Budget bills that he surely would have presented? Of course not. Boehner couldn’t even get them to sign the “no earmarks” pledge.

No, I believe that the GOP created a situation where Obama winning was the better of the obnoxious choices. You should have voted for Barr or Baldwin like many of us did for which we were roundly criticized (“You’re throwing your vote away!”)

Had the 7 million Republicans who stayed home voted 3rd party instead, Obama would still have won but with less than 50% of the vote, he would have been denied a mandate.

That was the best we could have done. We got the second best thing.

On March 4th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, obama_fail said:

Why did conservatives vote for this Clown (McCain)? I think the fate of the nation was sealed after the Florida primary.

Temporary insanity, drugs, booze? I have voted for the Turncoat wimp for the last time to be sure. I really wonder if the country would be any better run is this Manchurian Candidate had won.

He is all thrilled and happy with providing cover for Whitetrash Clinton establishing relation with Communist Viet Nam July 12, 1995 and providing Little Bush cover in giving Communist Viet Nam Most Favored Nation Status with out any pro quid pro from the commies.

All three of these cowards talked of healing wounds. Well I still use a cane, my brother-in-law is still missing a hand and a bunch of our buddies have other wounds, are dead or missing so I guess Manchurian Candidate McCain, Whitetrash Clinton and Little Bush are either lying, stupid, totally cynical or any combination of the three.

I use to sign my letters Bomb Hanoi but I have evolved and now sign
—
Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

What a moron! Conservatives are in position to retake party leadership from the RINOs and mister “I’m a conservative first and a Republican second” pulls a standard McCain trick to undercut conservatives.

Please people, please tell me you don’t listen to this idiot anymore.

If you want to gag, wait until he interviews McCain again. To say he gushes at McAmnesty’s feet is a gross understatement.

- The last time I checked, there was a 10-day (excepting Sundays) time limit on veto action in the Constitution.

- By bundling all the vetos into one massive fuzzball and then requiring majorities in both Houses of Congress to uphold the vetoes, the pork will invariably stay in.

The place to put the line-item veto in is in the Constitution, and then the normal veto procedure to run it.

On March 4th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, mijacat said:

One question regarding Feingold.

Just when did he cross the aisle and support something .. conservative?

That John McCain does not see the problem here speaks quite poorly of him.

Mew

The one non-liberal thing Feingold is known for here in Wisconsin is fiscal responsibility. Of course, his actual floor votes don’t exactly match up to his words, but he figures by conning his likely opponent in 2010 (Paul Ryan) into joining this meaningless sandwich, that will get ignored.