And another one bites the dust: Treasury Dept nominee bails…make that two

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 5, 2009 08:13 PM

Wow. The rats keep jumping off the sinking S.S. Treasury Department.

Timothy Geithner stands alone…again:

The person Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner wanted as his chief deputy withdrew from consideration Thursday, dealing a setback to the agency as it struggles to address the worst financial crisis in decades.

Annette Nazareth, a former senior staffer and commissioner with the Securities and Exchange Commission, made “a personal decision” to withdraw from the process, according to a person familiar with her decision.

The decision followed more than a month of intense scrutiny of her taxes and multiple interviews. No tax problems or other issues arose during Nazareth’s vetting, said the person, who requested anonymity because Geithner’s choice of Nazareth was never announced officially.

“She did put a great deal of consideration into the potential of taking the position, and she concluded that she really enjoys what she’s doing now,” this person said.

Though popular in policy circles, Nazareth has drawn criticism for her role in creating what some considered to be lax oversight of the banking industry.

Nazareth, 53, a partner at the law firm Davis Polk & Wardwell, could not be reached for comment. Treasury and White House officials said they would not comment.

Geithner has been criticized for staffing his department too slowly as it grapples with a banking crisis that has crippled the economy. Uncertainty about Treasury staff also has unnerved financial markets.

And there was another:

Geithner’s choice for undersecretary of international affairs, Caroline Atkinson, also withdrew from consideration, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

Cue Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust.”

Posted in: Tim Geithner

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Amateur Hour in DC « The Political Inquirer
  2. Another tax cheat Tim Geithner failure - choice for deputy withdraws | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  3. The Rude News » Blog Archive » The Rats Abandon The Titanic Presidency
  4. Bloodthirsty Liberal » How Can I Get You Alone?
  5. Dow 5,000? | The Great Illuminator
  6. 3 House Dems owe back taxes (Tea Party Anyone?) « Goodtimepolitics
  7. BizzyBlog » Lucid Links (030609)
  8. Schaschlik « abseits vom mainstream - heplev
  9. The News Factor: News, opinion, current events — a rewarding news experience » Blog Archive
  10. With Dow falling daily, will Geithner’s days be “numbered”; Obama’s Bear Market | New World News
  11. A lot of openings at the Department of the Treasury | STL-CargoShortsToday

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #640696
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:16 pm, TXGator said:

    Doesn’t want to be a part of the smoothest transition in the history of the United States?
    Must’ve had something better to do.

  2. #640697
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:18 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Aen’t there some out of work Soviets he could tap?

  3. #640701
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:21 pm, Paul Revere said:

    *Paging Lindsey Graham*

  4. #640708
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:27 pm, T-Bone said:

    No tax problems or other issues arose during Nazareth’s vetting, said the person, who requested anonymity

    said the person.. I know nuttink Col Klink.

  5. #640709
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:27 pm, bjc said:

    *I nominate Charlie Rangel; They share a similar background, so would work well together.

  6. #640713
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:32 pm, goodforlaughs said:

    None of obama’s court jesters are very funny. But, that’s what you get when you hang around with a bunch of fools.

  7. #640715
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I have also instructed the Obama administration to withdraw my name from consideration for any position they may have in mind for me. I am not aware of any but I don’t like surprises. Surely they must, after all, be getting close to the bottom of the barrel. That’s where I live. California.

  8. #640716
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:38 pm, DogBreath said:

    Another two of Commnader Zero’s troops are deserting. I guess even liberals have trouble following someone with a room temperature IQ.

  9. #640720
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, PatriotRider said:

    But isn’t he much smarter than Bush? I don’t get it. The world was supposed to be all rosy and stuff by now.

    BTW, I saw a picture of Big O on a car today. It read,”No, we can’t”. I shrugged.

  10. #640721
    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, txvet2 said:

    Surely they must, after all, be getting close to the bottom of the barrel.

    I guess Chapoutier better get ready for the phone call. Hope you haven’t been paying your taxes, Chappie. That’d disqualify you.

  11. #640725
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:00 pm, richardbo said:

    If Nazareth has no tax problems she doesn’t fit in.

  12. #640726
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:01 pm, Boomer said:

    Why don’t they just ask Bwarney Fwank or Chris Dodd to act as Tax Cheat Geithner’s deputies? After all I feel like I have been watching an episode of the 3 Stooges since ‘dear leader’ was sworn in so we might as well have 3 of them to laugh at as they flail along completely clueless in the dark.

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  13. #640727
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:02 pm, BayStateRepublican said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, txvet2 said:
    I guess Chapoutier better get ready for the phone call. Hope you haven’t been paying your taxes, Chappie. That’d disqualify you.

    Chap is way too droll for the BHO administration. His posts have been very amusing lately, though ;)

  14. #640729
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:08 pm, xler8bmw said:

    You can’t buy comedy like this ROTFLMAO!

  15. #640731
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:11 pm, T-Bone said:

    Its also funny how the Blame Bush thing is not being picked up. Obama has repeatedly used the line “The failed polices of the last 8 years” to little effect.

    “W” is keeping a low profile and it just isn’t resonating. People are tired of the Bush bashing and want results from the new guys who did all the criticizing. The blame game is old.

    Even the assault on Rush Limbaugh is a lame attempt to pass the buck and divert attention. Its legs will be short and Rush will ultimately turn it on them. He has more power and influence than they think. It was a stupid idea to begin with but they are running out of villians and the focus is on the new administration.

    Why would someone turn down a cabinet appointment? Those are once in a lifetime opportunities to serve your country and it is always good on your resume. Speaking fees, seminar tours, book deals, consulting work, corporate boards, TV interviews alone can give you a good paying job for years. For a politico, it is as good as it gets. If you paid your taxes and had no marital affairs. Oh sorry, those are ok too.

  16. #640734
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, ThatSamIAm said:

    Everyone is concluding this job is too big for Geitner and they don’t want to take a cruise on the Titanic.

    The Obama decision making process is a mess. His administration is the biggest joke going because you can’t find a socialist progressive democrat that does anything legally and with integrity.

  17. #640735
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:12 pm, tanksoldier said:

    It’s telling that so many people are bailing on teh administration.

    That said the country can’t function without a govt in place. The “O” may not be helping the country, but the govt is paralyzed without these functionaries in place.

    These are reversals ARE telling, but NOT good for anybody.

  18. #640738
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, T-Bone said:

    Imagine the problems Bush had in transitioning when Gore would not give up. It delayed his administration for months.

    I thought Obama was given all considerations to have a smooth transfer? He was a organizer. What happened?

  19. #640740
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:17 pm, T-Bone said:

    And I might add that President Bush began his term with an inherited recession.

  20. #640741
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:19 pm, 24Klady said:

    The oceans were either going to rise or recede – not sure which, but, we would heal – again not sure from which malady? Be careful what you promise (as any parent knows when talking to a 4 yr. old), and be careful what you wish for….& ‘Bambi, don’t recycle the same old crooks that got the Clinton’s in such hot water. ;)

  21. #640748
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:29 pm, Kevin K. said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:11 pm, T-Bone said: ((#15)

    Why would someone turn down a cabinet appointment? … For a politico, it is as good as it gets. If you paid your taxes and had no marital affairs. Oh sorry, those are ok too.

    Only for Dems.

  22. #640749
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:29 pm, DanGrantTx said:

    I am not surprised that rats are avoiding the ship that is about to sink. Even rats have intelligence, even if it does only involve cheese, tax avoidance and the talk-show circuit.

  23. #640755
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, Freddy said:

    After watching Geithners absurd remarks for the last couple of days, it is very clear to me why nobody wants a job working with him. Neither a serious business person nor a serious financial one can possibly believe the garbage he has been spouting.

  24. #640756
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:35 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    I guess this is Obama’s version of Transparency. The truth is going to get out because there’s so few people left behind to lie for him.

    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, T-Bone said:

    I thought Obama was given all considerations to have a smooth transfer? He was a organizer. What happened?

    It’s that whole reality thing. Don’t it suck when the real world gets in the way of pie-in-the-sky dreaming?

  25. #640766
    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:51 pm, hunter said:

    Why would someone turn down a cabinet appointment? Those are once in a lifetime opportunities to serve your country and it is always good on your resume. Speaking fees, seminar tours, book deals, consulting work, corporate boards, TV interviews alone can give you a good paying job for years. For a politico, it is as good as it gets. If you paid your taxes and had no marital affairs. Oh sorry, those are ok too.

    Because the hole in the hull is the size of a Mack Truck and growing by the minute. These idiots that put this POS fraud in power have already figured out that maybe they should have done a little research before voting and now they want no part of being in the history books (or scribed on cave walls if everything really goes south) as being a part of the administration that ruined this country.

  26. #640779
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:11 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:18 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Aen’t there some out of work Soviets he could tap?

    Yes. Gorbachev is angling for an appointment…

  27. #640781
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:12 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 9:51 pm, hunter said:

    These idiots … now want no part of being in the history books (or scribed on cave walls if everything really goes south) as being a part of the administration that ruined this country.

    Or started the second civil war, for that matter.

  28. #640786
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, Drews2Cents said:

    Because the hole in the hull is the size of a Mack Truck and growing by the minute.

    Well stated.

    Now the FDIC needs a bailout… I’m predicting a market crash tomorrow. Any takers on this bet?

  29. #640790
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, hunter said:

    Any takers on this bet?

    I hope that you aren’t taking any bets that are not backed by gold silver or coon skins, because paper money is soon going to be worth stacking on the shelf in the outhouse and nothing else.

  30. #640798
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:36 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Wha?????

    But, everyone wanted to be a part of history just 4 months ago

  31. #640808
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:40 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 8:35 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I have also instructed the Obama administration to withdraw my name from consideration for any position they may have in mind for me.

    Pretty soon, Obama’s people are going to weed through all the remaining candidates and the only one left will be that dude that gave us the ‘just gettin his Thug Thizzle on‘ video

    (And that one homeless guy at the Seattle Tea Party)

  32. #640818
    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:50 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    It’s that whole reality thing. Don’t it suck when the real world gets in the way of pie-in-the-sky dreaming?

    When you stop smoking the weed and the flashbacks finally quit melting the wallpaper designs into 3-D Picasso sculptures, you discover there’s no conspiracy and the real worlds a biatch.

  33. #640838
    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:14 pm, pinkpolkadot said:

    Wow lookin’ good on the appointments! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out!

  34. #640844
    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:22 pm, SPCOlympics said:

    Perhaps the “Going Galt” movement has spread to the Beltway…

    Who would want to take a cushy, high paying government job if you are going to loose it all to taxes anyways?

  35. #640845
    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:24 pm, Truesoldier said:

    I also saw this on Foxnews.com:

    At a Senate hearing Thursday about failed insurance giant American International Group Inc. — which has received four separate bailouts totaling more than $170 billion — Sen. Chris Dodd said he had asked Treasury for someone to appear, but that no one was available.

    “I am not pleased that we don’t have someone here from Treasury to explain what their role in this is,” Dodd said.

    Now correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn’t the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs have some clue what is going on.

  36. #640858
    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:52 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Yes. Gorbachev is angling for an appointment…

    He might be an improvement.

  37. #640859
    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:54 pm, DirkBelig said:

    How can anyone cling to the illusion that this “elegant man” is anything but a globe-threatening nincompoop when it seems that He can’t get ANYONE to serve in his Kingdom?!? If He was truly The One, you’d think that there’d be riots at the gates of the White House as desperate applicants proffered their resumes and fealty to The One. Not happening for some reason.

    hunter said: coon skins

    RAAAAAAAAAAAACIST!!!! Paging Revs. Al & Jesse. Paging…

  38. #640869
    On March 6th, 2009 at 12:15 am, Freddy said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, Drews2Cents said:

    Because the hole in the hull is the size of a Mack Truck and growing by the minute.

    Well stated.

    Now the FDIC needs a bailout… I’m predicting a market crash tomorrow. Any takers on this bet?

    I got the over/under at yet another -275

    Unfortunatly, I will take the under … sigh …

    I also think there is more ‘missing information’ regarding where this money is to be directed to.

  39. #640880
    On March 6th, 2009 at 12:43 am, happy2behere said:

    I nominate Joe the Plumber.

  40. #640883
    On March 6th, 2009 at 1:02 am, WisCon said:

    I thought this was an emergency.

  41. #640890
    On March 6th, 2009 at 1:29 am, Truesoldier said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 12:43 am, happy2behere said:
    I nominate Joe the Plumber.

    He is too smart to get mixed up in this mess (cause he realizes that as a conservative he would be made the scapegoat).

  42. #640894
    On March 6th, 2009 at 1:35 am, ronalddog said:

    We don’t need the stinking government – “Country cannot run without the government” – HA HA – I would prefer that they all quit – including all the senators – Like Rush says if the politicans are doing nothing it is good for the country.

  43. #640895
    On March 6th, 2009 at 1:41 am, Truesoldier said:

    I would prefer that they all quit

    That would solve multiple problems. First it would stop the budget deficeit from growing any larger, second it would stop the furthering of the socialistic agenda and last but not least it would stop the emmision of greenhose gasses coming from politicians that are full of themselves.

  44. #640913
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:04 am, graysonret said:

    That’s the new Presidental song now. Another one bites the dust. More accurate and appropiate than Hail to the Chief.

  45. #640935
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:18 am, tniles said:

    Darn, it was just so important that we have these two in Treasury. They were the wonderkids that could have brought us out of this crisis, no matter what kind of personal issues they have. (sarcasm off) Wasn’t that the line we were fed about Geither? Wouldn’t we have been better off if most of our elected officials wouldn’t have listened to that line of BS?

  46. #640942
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:47 am, tre said:

    The rats keep jumping off the sinking S.S. Treasury Department.

    I prefer to think of it as ships deserting a sinking rat.

  47. #640946
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:09 am, Durangodarlin said:

    Just think of the money we are saving by not having these positions filled. Two, if the positions aren’t filled, they can’t do anything. That alone is a plus. Let nature take its course!

  48. #640954
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:30 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    It looks like some are finally paying attention to the man behind the curtain, and realized that they’re not in Kansas anymore.

  49. #640958
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:36 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Anyone who is rational knew that Obama was not ready for this job. It’s becoming more and more clear to those still in denial.

    His choices for his cabinet are proving themselves to be horribly bad.

    As for Annette Nazareth, she used “personal reasons” as her excuse. Well… any time you turn down a job or leave a job and the real reason is you think the boss is an incompetent idiot, or just a jackass, the reason stated for leaving is usually “personal reasons”.

    Yeah… she sees the writing on the wall and despite the long term perks of a cabinet job, she just say.. “No no no..”

    Smart gal.

  50. #640967
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:52 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    And speaking of bad nominees…

    The Obama administration reportedly plans to invite Iran to an international conference on Afghanistan later this month, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced Thursday.

    “If we move forward with such a meeting, it is expected that Iran would be invited as a neighbor of Afghanistan,” Clinton told reporters in Brussels after meeting NATO foreign ministers, Reuters reports.

    In a dramatic shift from Bush administration policy, President Obama has indicated that the United States wishes to consult with Iran on a series of issues. The invitation to the March 31 conference would be the beginning of such an outreach, Reuters reports.

    “It is a way of bringing all the stakeholders and interested parties together,” Clinton told Reuters.
    Among other issues, the United States and Iran are at odds on its nuclear program, which Washington says is set on building an atomic bomb. Tehran, meanwhile, has said the program is for nonviolent, energy purposes.

    “Our task is to dissuade them, deter them and prevent from acquiring a nuclear weapon,” Clinton told Reuters.

    dissuade? deter?

    Ahmadinejad must be laughing his a$$ off right now. Clinton thinks she can talk her way to a solution. That’s exactly what Iran wants the US to think. “Yes Hilary, keep talking to us.. while we toil away in the back room building our bomb.”

    O/T sort of but I think it’s related in the Obama’s pick as disastrous.

  51. #640969
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:54 am, kthomas8268 said:

    No tax problems? Maybe that’s why. LOL

  52. #640971
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:59 am, chapoutier said:

    dissuade? deter?

    …and prevent? D’ja miss that one?

  53. #640976
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:02 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    Nope. You missed the point though.

  54. #640978
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:06 am, WarEagle82 said:
  55. #640979
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:06 am, joannmandolin said:

    Quagmire.

    Obama Priority #1:

    We can’t fall to socialism if
    we’re prospering.

    Mission Accomplished n’sh*t!
    Know what I’m sayin’ ???

  56. #640980
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:07 am, cicerokid said:

    Maybe he should tag that Monopoly guy…

  57. #640982
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:11 am, chapoutier said:

    Nope. You missed the point though.

    Oh do tell me what your point was, then. Because you seem to purposely and disingenuously ignore the fact that Clinton clearly leaves more aggresive measures on the table.

  58. #640985
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:14 am, RedDog said:

    On March 5th, 2009 at 11:52 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    Yes. Gorbachev is angling for an appointment…
    He might be an improvement.

    mmm What about Vladimir Posner, remember him from the Reagan/Gorby years? Is he available? He speaks beautifully.

    Looks like the “secular-progressives” now realize that all their bomb throwing is killing themselves as well as their enemies. Ain’t Karma a bi**h?

  59. #640986
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:15 am, Jimmie said:

    It is starting to look like that all we have to do to get out of this debit economy is to keep nominating democrats for high office and thereby forcing them to pay their taxes, even though they are exempted from paying late fees and penalties there appears to be a lot of money to be collected. We just need to nominate a lot more of them…….just a thought…the republican ‘leaderdingie’ would never be so mean to cause such embarrassment to their great and good friends.

  60. #641002
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:51 am, jangar said:

    Nazareth has drawn criticism for her role in creating what some considered to be lax oversight of the banking industry.

    Shouldn’t that be a resume enhancement? A perfect fit?

    Perhaps she’s holding out to run for congress.

  61. #641007
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:56 am, Tazed and Confused said:

    Who really wants to work for a crook? a liar? a moral relativist?…

    Oh…. I forgot… Timmy already signed on with Obie’s crew…

  62. #641010
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am, jangar said:

    Next Up: Drag a $20 thru Wallstreet and see who bites.

  63. #641012
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am, katablog said:

    What’s the possibility that Geithner will now offer these jobs to illegal aliens, claiming these are jobs that Americans won’t do?

  64. #641013
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am, cheapseat said:

    damn, life was sooo much easier when i was an academician or serving on those think tank jobs. now people expect me to actually know what i’m doing and do it, and i haven’t read that far in my textbook. life used to be like a sociology class, as long as you stay away from saying you really really like your mom, there weren’t any wrong answers. this is like those damn math classes, and those graders on wall street aren’t giving partial credit for wrong answers but a good effort.

  65. #641014
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:59 am, wighttrasch said:

    Ah, man–
    as a ‘Year of the Rat’-born person, I am offended at all the rat stereotypes used here.

  66. #641023
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:04 am, Truesoldier said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:58 am, katablog said:
    What’s the possibility that Geithner will now offer these jobs to illegal aliens, claiming these are jobs that Americans won’t do?

    LOL….so true so very very true.

  67. #641061
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:32 am, Dexter Alarius said:

    Well, the GM CFO will probably be available shortly.

  68. #641062
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:32 am, walterc said:

    I think she decided there is more cash to be had by working for AIG or Citibank. Parties, retreats, bonuses wtc. that civil servants just to qualify for.

    On a somewhat related note, my wife made an observation this morning about OB. She said since he came from humble beginnings, he’s living kind of like the kids from the projects that get drafted by the NFL or the NBA. Suddenly having more money than they know what to do with, they just go on a reckless spending spree.

    Looking at the Wednesday night Kobe beef parties at the Whitehouse, the Friday night date nights and Michelle’s weekly flights back to Chi town to hang with her friends, I realized she’s right. These are people drunk with money and power without a manager to hold the leash. Next thing ya know they’ll be underage coke & hooker parties in the Whitehouse and dog fighting at Camp David.

  69. #641121
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:03 am, happyscrapper said:

    I predict that the first black POTUS in history will also be the first black POTUS to be thrown out of office before his first term ends. I am very serious when I say this. He is not going a good job. And when people who should be thrilled to be in a presidential administration decide they don’t want to…that is very telling. The Soros Golden Boy is rapidly turning into a “pig in a poke”. (Google that phrase…it is a perfect description of Obama, AND it has pork in it!)

  70. #641177
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:44 am, NJ-Aviator said:

    chapoutier said:

    Nope. You missed the point though.

    Oh do tell me what your point was, then. Because you seem to purposely and disingenuously ignore the fact that

    Neither purposely ignored nor disingenuous about it. My opinion of what she means by “prevent” is to convince them with talks that building a nuke is not in their best interests. That’s been the Dems way and there’s nothing “on the table” as you say that says they’ll ultimately handle it any differently.

    And the point is simply that the Democrats are hell bent on doing things differently than the “Evil Bush Regime”.. namely, as Obama himself has said, he wants to talk.

    Well, it’s been demonstrated by history that despotic regimes such as Iran and North Korea love to “talk” to the West. They’ll give Hilary tidbits to take back to the White House and little hints that they “might” consider cooperating… if only the deal is just right. Oh… they won’t stop their nuke program while these talks are going on. And ultimately, they’ll reject any deal as an insult or as meddling in their internal affairs. Then they’ll build what they want anyway. In this case… a Nuke.

    So to me, the word “prevent” in this administration’s vocabulary means anything BUT the use of force. Which I suspect is how you may have interpreted the use of the word.

    By the way, I enjoy reading your posts here. Even if there are few issues we’d ever agree on. Cheers.

    oh…and don’t be so condescending Chap. It makes you seem rather unfriendly.

  71. #641238
    On March 6th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, chapoutier said:

    oh…and don’t be so condescending Chap. It makes you seem rather unfriendly.

    Let me apologize for coming off cranky. It was unnecessary.

    But come on…”prevent” has a very clear meaning, especially when juxtaposed with “dissuade” and “deter” i.e., diplomacy and sanctions.

    But if all we are going to do is argue semantics or what such and such could mean or may do in the future, it is probably pointless.

  72. #641257
    On March 6th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    But come on…”prevent” has a very clear meaning, especially when juxtaposed with “dissuade” and “deter” i.e., diplomacy and sanctions.

    Fair enough. It could in fact mean that she would intend to use force. But given Obama’s stated positions on these issues, do you really think that’s likely? I just don’t believe she has that much pull or that she’s got the administration behind her in that regard.

    But I’ll say this. It’s probably accepted by most that she is the least likely person in the cabinet that one would want to mess with. aka.. she’s probably the most hawkish. But I don’t think that’s the administration’s stance.

    And thanks. No apology was needed, but appreciated and accepted.

  73. #641389
    On March 6th, 2009 at 1:29 pm, gridlock said:

    Try to sound less gleeful, Michelle. It sounds almost like you want Obama to fail!

  74. #641486
    On March 6th, 2009 at 2:43 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Annette Nazareth suffered a sudden attack of “Reality Awareness Terror Syndrome” (RATS) – it afflicts without warning to anybody finally realizing that they are about to step foot onto a sinking ship.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Punchline of the day

October 19, 2009 10:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

45 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Obama’s Treasury money men: “Counselor” is the new czar

October 14, 2009 10:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Same old, same old.

Turning up heat on Democrat culture of corruption

September 9, 2009 12:04 PM by Michelle Malkin

61 Comments | 1 Trackback

Turbo Tax Tim tucks tail

September 3, 2009 11:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

24 Comments | 1 Trackback

Turbo Tax Tim goes all Rahm-bo on regulators

August 4, 2009 10:09 AM by Michelle Malkin

15 Comments | 6 Trackbacks

Sunday morning on the Beltway roundtable circuit

August 2, 2009 12:28 PM by Michelle Malkin

69 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Tim Geithner is a joke in China, too

June 1, 2009 03:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

93 Comments | 25 Trackbacks

How do you say “Snort-worthy” in Mandarin?


Categories: Tim Geithner



Legal Insurrection

» Calling For Sparkman Apologies

American Thinker

» The Wilding of Sarah Palin
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook