Town: Um, we don’t need porkulus money for homeless

Gee, how many times do you think this scenario is being played out across the country:
The Town of Union is getting $578,661 in federal Recovery Act funding for a homeless problem that may not exist within its borders.
The money is coming from the federal Housing and Urban Development program to pay for homeless prevention and emergency shelter programs.
Union did not request the money and does not currently have homeless programs in place in the town to administer such funds, said town Supervisor John Bernardo.
“We were surprised,” Bernardo said. “We’ve never been a recipient before.”
Bernardo said he isn’t aware of any homeless issue in the largely suburban town.
I’m sure Joe Biden, a.k.a. Bozo the VP, will get to the bottom of this and report back on that website thingy. What’s the website number again, Joe?
For now, Bernardo said he and other town officials are looking into why the town got the homeless prevention money and how – and even if – the money can be used by the town.
Glantz said the money can be used for people who may be in danger of losing their jobs and their residences.
“We hope and encourage these new grantees to develop creative strategies for the funding,” Glantz said of Union’s homeless grant.
“Creative” = Do whatever the hell you want with the money. Who wants an iPhone? Yippee!
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Trackbacks
- » Blog Archive » Heavy Handed!:Michelle Malkin | We don’t need porkulus money for homeless
- Town Doesn’t Need Fed Money, Obama’s Porkulus Guys Say “Be Creative” « Frugal Café Blog Zone
- Glenn Beck Smacks A Commie; Drawing comparissons between Barack Obama and America’s Communists « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
- UPDATE 06 Mar - No gov’t health insurance « Goodtimepolitics
- Town Gets Stimulus Money for Non-Existent Homeless Problem
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Categories: fiscal stimulus
Doug Ross @ Journal
» Democrats shocked -- SHOCKED -- that Republicans won't eat the juicy, tender crap sandwich they cooked up all on their own
Green Room
» Miss Me Yet? Bush Billboard Mystery Solved
Mudville Gazette
» New Standards in Journalism
Redstate
» Michael Steele Plays the Race Card

JustOneMinute
» He Played It Left Hand, But Took It Too Far
Hot Air
» Quotes of the day
Ed Driscoll
» The Night Chicago Died








So, you can use the money ahead of time if you think you’re gonna lose your job? What a country! I’ll have me some o’ dat! I feel a cutback comin’ on at my work—can I have a new car to go look for another job? Make it a Maserati…
Let’s see, people who buy more house than they can afford get money, corporations that keep loosing money get money, and the homeless get money.
I think I am going to become a corporate executive in a failing company that has lost my home due to more bad decions and is now going to live in a cardboard box. Wow it looks like I just won the lottery.
Daddy wants to stimulate the economy with a new sports car!!!
I may be in danger of losing my home–should I cease payment. Can I have some money?
Of course, if I want to qualify for these “wonder rates” according to my bank, I need to stop payment for six months and destroy my sterling credit.
And go against my principles.
And lose my dignity.
And quit working.
Hmmm….decisions, decisions.
My hope is that the Town, and every other municipality, county and State that doesn’t want, or can’t, use the stim money will return it.
In fact let the money sit in an account that we can see online. Let it sit there for as long as it takes until VP Biden says, “pull it back.”
Just because you can, doesn’t mean you have to. Said another way, just because you have money does not mean you have to spend it.
Schumer has already said that New York will take any money not wanted by other states.
Obama is just looking ahead like any good dear leader. He knows the town will need that money in the coming months when everyone in the town becomes homeless.
Watch for the proud, ‘major’ announcement that $578,661 in federal funding has been identified as ‘wasteful’ by that frugal watchdog President Obama.
Only about
$999,999,421,339 left to cut.
The Obama administration, and this democrat congress are the definition of corrupt governance.
and of course him and the rest use the argument that if you don’t like the bill then don’t take the funds. What a Jerk _ff.
zyzzyg–Paul said it this way;
‘just because something is legal, does not make it expedient’
This whole thing is rapidly turning into a clown show.
Chuckie will have to beat Ahnold two falls out of three to get it.
My hometown, a speck along on a map, also received money for “the homeless”. Nobody in town is homeless! In the absence of instructions, the town put the money into a CD until it is recalled.
Doesn’t anyone in the government bother checking with the local governments before these funds are released? Or would that be too inconvenient for the shovel out of the treasury door?
Hey! No one messes with Joe! (snicker)
Would they give me some money for camping equipment? I could use a new tent and air mattress.
Well, I think they should be grateful that this administration is looking ahead. We are told almost daily that 9 MILLION people will be homeless because of the foreclosure crises.
I live in Vegas, one of the hardest hit and one can hardly move about town due to the number of people living on the street.
It’s become a real problem.
BTW, how do you do sarcasm?
Fixed it.
Unfortunately, San Antonio is digging desperately to find projects to stick the money into. It’s probably going to end up like the banks – you’ll be forced to take the money whether you want it or not.
Where is this town of Union? I didn’t see it in the story.
No kidding, a co-worker of mine from Houston went home on R&R and thought she would look at buying a home to use as a rental property in Houston in her neighborhood. She said that she did not see any properties listed as foreclosed, so she checked with the bank and they directed her to the area of town known to be populated with Illegal aliens….
Connecticut I think.
Not surprised. I would live to know what the percentage is for illegal aliens who have defaulted. Look at the states that show the largest default rates. CA, NV, TX, FL can’t remeber the 5th…what do they all have in common?
live=love
preview not working
Not surprised. I would live to know what the percentage is for illegal aliens who have defaulted. Look at the states that show the largest default rates. CA, NV, TX, FL can’t remeber the 5th…what do they all have in common?
Arizona. Surprise! Surprise!
Programs for the homeless are a huge scam. Here in Denver, we just paid $10 MILLION to build apartments for people who will pay no rent, given away phones that are sold for booze money, and phone cards which are also sold for booze money. The Philidelphia Plan, which is touted as a success, spent $100,000 per year per person to “keep someone from being homeless”. Not only is it a waste of money, all it does is shuffle the people of to drink themselves to death.
Does anyone remember the movie “Falling Down”?
The movie is starting to look more like a documentary and less a work of fiction the longer this pigfest goes on.
On March 5th, 2009 at 12:33 pm, RTater said:
Programs for the homeless are a huge scam. Here in Denver, we just paid $10 MILLION to build apartments for people who will pay no rent, given away phones that are sold for booze money, and phone cards which are also sold for booze money. The Philidelphia Plan, which is touted as a success, spent $100,000 per year per person to “keep someone from being homeless”. Not only is it a waste of money, all it does is shuffle the people of to drink themselves to death.
Vegas just recently had a census to count the homeless. When the figures were much lower than projected, rather than be glad, the bleeding hearts claimed that the figures they projected were actually right but the homeless were hiding from them.
every homeless person has 2 beaurocrats in the gubmint to oversee his/her plight. we’re such a compassionate country, and yes both those gubmint employees are related to mr obama, third cousins on his unknown father’s side, he thinks. so it’s stimulatin the hood big time.
Michelle,
Not that I doubt you – I don’t – but could you put a link to wherever you got this story?
I don’t see one. Thanks.
Heh. Free absolution, here I come.
Here’s the link to the story. Looks like Union is in upstate NY.
So far, our little town is not being affected much by the foreclosure bug. I guess there are not many Canadians who are sneaking over the border to do anything but see me or another of my medical colleagues.