The “Going Galt” phenom spreads; Whoopi goes on anti-tax rant

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 6, 2009 05:15 PM

“Going Galt” is going viral.

The phenomenon Dr. Helen Smith first diagnosed last fall has spread noticeably since our discussion of it at CPAC/CS2.0 last week and my column/blog posts/your comments throughout the past week.

The NYTimes (disparagingly, of course) picked up on it today. The Liberty Papers has a comprehensive round-up of recent blog coverage from all sides. And here’s an interview with Dr. Helen. Excerpt:

Smith was a little ahead of the curve of what has become an incredibly popular meme. Across the broad conservative movement, from members of Congress to activists to economists, Rand’s final, allegorical novel is being looked at with fresh eyes. According to the Atlas Society, a think tank that promotes and analyzes Rand’s work, sales of “Atlas Shrugged” have tripled since the presidential election. One congressman says that Rand wrote a “rulebook” that can guide conservatives through the age of Obama; another calls Obama’s policies something right out of the mind of Rand. One economist says that Rand’s fantasies have become reality. Smith is one of many activists citing Rand to explain their decisions to sell their stocks, or to explain why the president’s “demonization” of run-amok CEOs is aggravating the economic slowdown. The popular meme is giving critics of the president’s policies a way to explain why, they believe, it’s doomed to fail — because Rand predicted all of this…

…he activists who have latched onto “Atlas Shrugged” don’t spend as much time thinking about the heroic-capitalist side of the analogy. For Dr. Smith’s readers, like their counterparts writing in to libertarian blogs and protesting Obama at “tea parties, ” the novel is most useful for the concept of “going Galt.” “I do some consulting on the side and the taxation on that income is unbelievable,”wrote one reader to Michelle Malkin. “So, to heck with this. I’m ‘going Galt’ on my consulting.” “I’m considering moving to a small family farm in a foreign country,” wrote a reader to Smith, “and looking into the practical side of the issue right now. It will take a year or two of preparation, but might be feasible and even comfortable.”

Smith, who’s still mulling over ways that she can “go Galt,” sees a possibility for a moral stand. During the Iraq War, she read about a painter who’d painted less, reducing his income, in order to dodge taxes and thereby make sure he didn’t fund the war. “I’d go John Galt just to not pay for programs I don’t believe in,” said Smith. “If we’re opposed to socialistic concepts — if we know they don’t work — why should we pay to support them?”

***

Well, well, well: Whoopi doesn’t like getting taxed out the wazoo. She went on a little rant today, complaining: “I don’t wanna get it comin’ and going’…BACK OFF ME! (fast-forward to 3:30):

(hat tip – reader Glenn)

Reap what you have sown, sister.

Posted in: Going Galt, Tea Party

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Going John Galt? | Radio Vice Online
  2. The Tea Party is Here: Mr. President - We didn’t ask for socialism! The One Trillion Dollar Takeover of Health Care « Jim Blazsik
  3. Wow! Even The View’s Whoopi Goldberg is “Going Galt” | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  4. Good Richard's Almanac
  5. Whoopi on taxes: BACK OFF ME! | Liberty Confidential
  6. What Did You Think Was Gonna Happen?! « Patriot Burr
  7. ‘Okie’ on the Lam » Blog Archive » The Taxinator — Time For Impeachement?
  8. The Liberty Papers »Blog Archive » Where Was the Republican Outrage Before Obama Was Elected?
  9. William Ayers and Ward Churchhill speaking at University of Boulder Colorado « Goodtimepolitics
  10. Michelle Malkin » The “Going Galt” phenom spreads; Whoopi goes on … | Blogs In Maine
  11. A Brave New World « Shades of Gray
  12. Can Democracy Fail With Obama’s Socialist Help? « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  13. The Other McCain: Full Metal Jacket Saturday
  14. Cheat Seeking Missiles » The Taxinator
  15. The Bells start to ring: « DaTechguy’s Blog
  16. Hope For The Rest Of Us | America Needs Me
  17. Hope For The Rest Of Us | America Needs Me
  18. “Who is John Galt?” | The Great Illuminator
  19. Retake Education
  20. Webloggin » The Taxinator — Time For Impeachement?
  21. Webloggin » The Taxinator — Time For Impeachement?
  22. Texas Tea Parties » Blog Archive » The “Going Galt” phenom spreads; Whoopi goes on anti-tax rant
  23. Forgetting Nostradamus - Framing the Dialogue
  24. Moonbattery
  25. So You Think You Can John Galt? | Are you Insane?
  26. Ayn Kampf - Revisited « his vorpal sword
  27. Porky’s II - Coming Soon? | The Great Illuminator
  28. The Sham of Socialism: Save America While There’s Still Time… ‘1984′ Prophesy « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  29. Obama’s Recession: Racial Gap Growing, No End in Sight — Unemployed NYC Blacks’ Numbers Increasing at Alarming Rate « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #641726
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    reducing his income, in order to dodge taxes and thereby make sure he didn’t fund the war

    Reducing income to reduce your tax burden is legal…it’s not a dodge!

    I guess I’ve got to stop letting that mischaracterization bother me since it appears everywhere.

    Nope, it still bothers me!!!

    Wish I could drop out and go Galt. That’s sort of the conservative version of becoming a hippie! Except without drugs and poor hygiene…and there’s a point to it beyond just yourself. Okay, it’s nothing like being a hippie.

  2. #641727
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:26 pm, TypicalWhite said:

    “The rich” are not a cow to be tied to a rail and milked. We move – we adapt – we respond to tax increases with behavioral changes. Good luck, BO, explaining why tax increases have to head down the income scale to your precious “working families”. Quoting The Princess Bride: “I do not think that means what you think it means.”

  3. #641728
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, mbarn said:

    These are truly amazing and very frightening times we are in. Ayn Rand’s book is so accurate that it has me spooked. Thanks for helping to keep me and all the other readers informed Michelle, you are truly the best. Thank you.

  4. #641732
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, collinb said:
  5. #641738
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, wrcnossen said:

    It would be interesting to see the first nation or state to make things easier on the producers of wealth – the rich – and how fast they would come out of this recession.

  6. #641744
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, genso said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, wrcnossen said:

    It would be interesting to see the first nation or state to make things easier on the producers of wealth – the rich – and how fast they would come out of this recession.

    China. Whoda thought it?

  7. #641745
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Good luck, BO, explaining why tax increases have to head down the income scale to your precious “working families”.

    According to “the One”, if you make over $250K, you’re not “working”.

    I’m still trying to figure out what we all are doing.

  8. #641748
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, steveegg said:

    Somebody wake me up – I can’t believe Whoppi Goldberg would wake up to the fact that infinite taxes isn’t the answer.

  9. #641753
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:44 pm, PeevedGuy said:

    Somebody wake me up – I can’t believe Whoppi Goldberg would wake up to the fact that infinite taxes isn’t the answer.

    I know, right? I couldn’t believe it either. I thought maybe I misheard her when i was agreeing. But Joy Whatsername is still as clueless as ever.

  10. #641754
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, hunter said:

    Hey Whoppi, STFU, you are one of the people that put this miserable failure in office. If anyone can complain, it is me and all the rest that can say (without lying, which I believe there are soon to be many) I DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM!

  11. #641760
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:49 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:45 pm, hunter said:

    Hey Whoppi, STFU, you are one of the people that put this miserable failure in office.

    Now, now – never a good idea to beat up on someone who’s recovering from a bad case of the hive-minds.

    Always welcome the formerly infected back to health.

  12. #641766
    On March 6th, 2009 at 5:57 pm, RedRepub said:

    Joy, you ignorant sl*t:
    Obama was still in the IL Senate debting traffic light placements when the Senate voted on the Iraq war. Paying taxes for porkulus is NOT designed to “build the country back up”.

    I love how now that a Dem president and Congress are failing, the View chickens put the fault in both GOP and DNC laps.

    And Whoopi- The AIG and other bank bailouts were Nancy’s , not George’s.

  13. #641767
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    I…can’t…watch…Whoppi.

    MM: Thanks for providing the partial quote so we could get the gist without having to endure watching her talk.

  14. #641768
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:00 pm, RedRepub said:

    And another thing-

    I think there are some idiots people in the country who think taxes go to charitable things- helping the poor, therefore the govt is seen as a charity to them. So they don’t mind paying taxes for that. (Evcen Clinton gave a sermon at the natl. cathedral once saying that the congregation had to give to “our ministry”.)

  15. #641769
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:02 pm, havok said:

    So…what if we take going Galt to the next level?

    What if…just a what if…everyone one of us who decided to live within our means…keep our debt down…make our house payments on time all decided to just not pay on our mortgage for the month of April? Do you think that might wake up a few of the Obamaton Zombies?

    I don’t ask this lightly. I’ve never missed a house payment…my cars are paid off…my TV is a 10 year old 27″ CRT. After getting laid off (quite suddenly and without warning…out for 9 months) in 2001 I decided to never again carry debt beyond my house payment (and yes…I pay extra each month).

    I take that obligation serious but I really don’t want to pay the mortgage for people I know who make no more than me but just had to go buy a $600k house (compared to my 150k house) that they have no “right” being in. Why should we bail them out? They knew better but just had to have a few more square feet than the Jones’s. Why is that my problem to pay for now?

  16. #641775
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:07 pm, richardbo said:

    I worked for 45 years and never even came close to 250K a year. However, I always thought it might be possible. It was always a goal to do better personally and financially. Because the possibility of doing better was always there I kept striving and still do. Without the dream we are doomed.

  17. #641780
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:12 pm, expres12 said:

    One thing I learned from that video is Behar is totally void of any intelligence.

  18. #641781
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, zorro said:

    Rush played the clip during lunch. Buyers remorse to the max.

    The Messiah Obama (otherwise referred to as that Chicago Thug) turns out to be a pig in a poke!

  19. #641782
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, bradley said:

    WHY does this blog and HotAir both continue to give this idiot show ANY publicity at all? Nothing these women say matters in the least, they’re just chanting talking points and previously-stated biases, so to HELL WITH THEM. AND their stupid show. Forget them.

  20. #641784
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, tonyinmaine said:

    About a month ago, I started “going Galt” before I even knew really what that meant. I’m trying to relocate from very blue Maine to very red South Carolina, where the taxes are considerably lower, not to mention the cost of living in general. I’m also willing to cut my pay down from what I get now, because as I see it, the true loss in dollars out of my pocket is about the same. I’ve postponed buying a car and appliances because I can do without for now and keep using the old ones. If I can get my house sold, I intend to hold onto my profit and not buy another house for a while because there is a glut of cheap rentals on the market now. As a white straight Republican male that is continually attacked as evil by the Obama team on down to my local government, I have no incentive anymore to work as hard and advance myself just so that I can fund these people that hate me. I can get by with a lot less than I have, and I intend to do that. And the truth of the matter is, I will be perfectly happy doing it, while the liberal haters remain miserable.

  21. #641785
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:02 pm, havok said:

    So…what if we take going Galt to the next level?

    What if… [we]… all decided to just not pay on our mortgage for the month of April?

    I’d much rather see everyone refuse to pay their income taxes, OR see everyone start pressuring their local State representatives to declare independence from the tyrannical federal government.

  22. #641786
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, kevin45 said:

    hunter said:
    Hey Whoppi, STFU, you are one of the people that put this miserable failure in office. If anyone can complain, it is me and all the rest that can say (without lying, which I believe there are soon to be many) I DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM!

    There are at least 57 million of us that can honestly say it

  23. #641792
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:22 pm, havok said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, FilmLadd said:

    I’d much rather see everyone refuse to pay their income taxes, OR see everyone start pressuring their local State representatives to declare independence from the tyrannical federal government.

    How do those of us get out of paying income taxes? Mine are taken out by my employer?

    Maybe we should all go change our tax with holding to married with 400 dependents…that would drop the taxes going in quite a bit….

  24. #641797
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, johnsteele said:

    Hey Whoopi, I know what you mean. Good thing we didn’t go ga-ga over Obama, heh? Oh, wait you did.

    Moron.

  25. #641799
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:34 pm, johnsteele said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, kevin45 said:

    hunter said:
    Hey Whoppi, STFU, you are one of the people that put this miserable failure in office.

    She’s probably still ga-ga over Obama. It hasn’t occurred to her feeble little brain that he’s the reason this is happening, she probably blames Bush for the tax increase.

  26. #641800
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:34 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    Whoopi and her cowmate Behar need to grow up and take a good hard look at themselves. They are absolute idiots.

  27. #641809
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:46 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:22 pm, havok said:

    Maybe we should all go change our tax with holding to married with 400 dependents…that would drop the taxes going in quite a bit….

    Yep, and I don’t think there’s any law against claiming maximum deductions (you just have to pay it later). If everyone claimed max deductions on their witholdings in one month’s time, it would probably cripple the government.

  28. #641810
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, secondsight said:
  29. #641811
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:50 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Whoopi don’t wanna get it comin’ and going’

    No problem from me Whoopi-but we do reap what we sow.

    cowmate Behar?
    RogerCfromSD, you are my hero :)

    A Whoopi, a cowmate and BaBaWaWa all one one show–damn that has to be ugly.

    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  30. #641812
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:50 pm, mikeg said:

    i gotta go with Bradley on this one. The hell with that show!

  31. #641816
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:57 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:49 pm, secondsight said:

    Honeymoon over; notice the shifty eyes in this illustration:
    http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_11/b4123016507664.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5

    That illustration should earn Philip Burke an IRS audit–thou shall not criticize, challenge nor mock He Who’s Middle Name is Hussein.

    cowmate Behar! I am still laughing.

    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  32. #641817
    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:57 pm, TXGator said:

    Wrestling fans:
    Can you SMELL what BA-ROCK is cooking!??

    If it feels like a backlash and smells like a backlash….

  33. #641818
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:03 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    One thing I learned from that video is Behar is totally void of any intelligence.

    I keep saying it – she is Larry King in a dress.

  34. #641819
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:03 pm, regularguy said:

    How can Joy be so stunningly stupid? How do these idiots make a living, and such a large one at that? For this show to be on TV year after year with a large enough audience to justify its existence shows you how doomed we are unless people wake up to and defeat the sheer lack of common sense and ignorance that seems to be overwhelming our society.

  35. #641820
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:06 pm, CrazyFool said:

    Looks like Whoopsie was worried about the wrong presidential candidate forcing her (and everyone else) into slavery….

    Personally I don’t think anyone on that show has two brain cells to rub together…..

  36. #641821
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:07 pm, bluesoc said:

    I encourage everyone here to go Galt. It just means more work for me!

  37. #641823
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:10 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:07 pm, bluesoc said:
    I encourage everyone here to go Galt. It just means more work for me!

    It sure does, but you show your stupidity, because you will eventually be working for nothing and waiting for the government to dole out to you what they see fit. Have fun with your new master, idiot.

  38. #641825
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:13 pm, bluesoc said:

    It sure does, but you show your stupidity, because you will eventually be working for nothing and waiting for the government to dole out to you what they see fit. Have fun with your new master, idiot.

    I’m not clear when that step comes in.

  39. #641826
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:18 pm, RobM1981 said:

    Whoopi and Joy,

    What did you expect? Seriously, who do you think Obama was talking about when he said “neighborly?”

    The depth of your ignorance on this is impressive.

    But Joy… oh Joy… for you to say “we’re going back to the tax rate we had under Clinton, and we ran a surplus, so let’s give it a chance,” is the stupidest thing I’ve heard since “I’ll still respect you in the morning.”

    It shows not ignorance, but *staggering* ignorance. Unforgivable ignorance. Criminal ignorance.

    The differences between the economies that Clinton and Obama inherited, as well as their economic policies, are – well, insert your own hyperbole here.

    Could somebody show me one redeeming feature from this human being? I’ll settle for one…

  40. #641827
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:18 pm, hunter said:

    I’m not clear when that step comes in.

    If zero keeps getting everything he wants by the spineless congress we have, probably about next October.

  41. #641829
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:18 pm, Buy Danish said:

    Reap what you have sown, sister.

    Right on, right on.

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, tonyinmaine said:

    I’m trying to relocate from very blue Maine to very red South Carolina, where the taxes are considerably lower, not to mention the cost of living in general.

    Our family moved from Maine to S.C. in 1999. It was great! We’re in Georgia now, but as beautiful as Maine is, we’d never move back North. In addition to the lower taxes and lower cost of living, you’ll love having people who aren’t crunchy granola libtard birkenstockers to talk to.

  42. #641830
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:19 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    What can I say….. I told you so…. nan nan nan nan boo boo….. forgive me, Friday and my soul is telling me to decompress and fight tomorrow….God bless all and have a safe night…… Patrol down and back in camp…..

  43. #641832
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:20 pm, bradley said:

    One part of the economy to get an immediate stimulus from Obama was the Portuguese water dog breeder who sold him a puppy for his kids for between $1,500 and $2,800. The new White House dog is that breed, and the prices are listed on a multiple breeder web site http://www.nextdaypets.com.
    Of course, he COULD have twisted an admirer’s arm and gotten it free. That’s the Chicago Way. Send Rahm to get it. And, Rahm, pick up those things on the lawn tomorrow, will you? Twice a day. That’s a good boy. Dance for your dinner.

  44. #641833
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:22 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:07 pm, bluesoc said:

    I encourage everyone here to go Galt. It just means more work for me!

    You don’t have the skill set to make a decent soda-jerk or pop-up target at the range. Just keep pickin fly s@&t out of pepper and be happy that you have that as a marketable skill.

  45. #641834
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:22 pm, Dimsdale said:

    Practice saying it now: “the failed policies of Barack Obama.”

  46. #641835
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, happyscrapper said:

    This is really funny. I NEVER watch that stupid, infuriating show. But today, I was flipping channels and happened to hit that show just as Whoopie was yelling about something, so I stopped to listen. I was flabbergasted that she was on a rant about the tax-crazy Obama! I even told my husband about it. Then, Rush Limbaugh mention it on his show. I only watched about 5 minutes, but it was exactly the five minutes that everyone is talking about. Of course Behar defended His Holiness…she is a piece of ugly crap. But Whoopie has always had a good head on her shoulders. I have heard her with Bill O’Reilly, etc. and she is respectful and actually makes some sense, for a liberal, that is.

  47. #641836
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, bradley said:

    As an aside, Rahm Emanuel’s bio states he graduated from an Evanston (IL) ballet school, then went to SARAH LAWRENCE college (a former all-girl’s school) due to their having a great dance program. Wonder how good Sarah Lawrence’s football team will be this fall?

  48. #641837
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:24 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:22 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    You don’t have the skill set to make a decent soda-jerk

    No offense sky, but you may have just dated yourself!!

  49. #641840
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:28 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:24 pm, hunter said:

    None taken. I… forgot what I was going to say… gotta go, Matlock’s on! :)

  50. #641841
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:30 pm, AuntiEm said:

    Somebody tell Joy Behar that Obama couldn’t vote against the war because he was not a US Senator at the time. That woman is not very bright, just nasty.

  51. #641843
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:32 pm, txvet2 said:

    No offense sky, but you may have just dated yourself!!

    Just mis-punctuated it. It should have been “a decent soda, jerk.”

  52. #641845
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, bluesoc said:

    You don’t have the skill set to make a decent soda-jerk or pop-up target at the range. Just keep pickin fly s@&t out of pepper and be happy that you have that as a marketable skill.

    My point is that even if those in the highest tax bracket go galt, it doesn’t mean that the work will simply disappear. Those in the lower tax brackets will be in higher demand, and thus have more incentive to work more (because they’ll get paid more).

    I’d assume most people here are not in the highest tax bracket. I think you’d love to get more money for your work.

  53. #641847
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:36 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, zorro said:
    Rush played the clip during lunch. Buyers remorse to the max.

    The Messiah Obama (otherwise referred to as that Chicago Thug) turns out to be a pig in a poke!

    Ha! I said that exact same thing on another thread this morning! I don’t know if you saw it, or if two great minds came up with the same thing, but it is a great moniker for him!

  54. #641848
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:39 pm, happyscrapper said:

    A

    Whoopi, a cowmate and BaBaWaWa all one one show–damn that has to be ugly.

    Too ugly to watch more than 5 minutes without burning your eyeballs.

  55. #641849
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:42 pm, hunter said:

    My point is that even if those in the highest tax bracket go galt, it doesn’t mean that the work will simply disappear. Those in the lower tax brackets will be in higher demand, and thus have more incentive to work more (because they’ll get paid more).

    You really have no clue as to what you are talking about do you? IT WILL NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE MAKING MORE! Especially if the top enders go Galt. That means that there will be more yes, but the government is going to need more and more money from each worker that even if there is plenty of work at “great” wages you will be making less overall.

  56. #641850
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:43 pm, Buy Danish said:

    BTW, I think that bumper sticker would make more sense if it said, Honk if I’m paying your mortgage

  57. #641852
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:45 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:23 pm, bradley said:
    As an aside, Rahm Emanuel’s bio states he graduated from an Evanston (IL) ballet school, then went to SARAH LAWRENCE college (a former all-girl’s school) due to their having a great dance program. Wonder how good Sarah Lawrence’s football team will be this fall?

    I always thought Rahm seemed a little light in the loafers. Um…Not that there’s anything wrong with that!!

  58. #641853
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:46 pm, wrcnossen said:

    bluesoc – Yes, the work will disappear. Not only do the so-called rich make more money, but they also do most of the buying. If they are not buying new homes, cars, vacations, remodeling, etc., there just isn’t as much work to do. And this doesn’t include the lost business to business purchases.

  59. #641854
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    No offense sky, but you may have just dated yourself!!

    So what? I remember ice boxes.

  60. #641855
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:50 pm, bluesoc said:

    You really have no clue as to what you are talking about do you? IT WILL NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE MAKING MORE! Especially if the top enders go Galt. That means that there will be more yes, but the government is going to need more and more money from each worker that even if there is plenty of work at “great” wages you will be making less overall.

    It seems you’re arguing that the government will have to raise taxes for lower brackets if the top bracket goes Galt.

    I don’t really think that’s obvious. Going Galt doesn’t mean stopping production altogether. It simply means cutting back on production to the point where your marginal benefits = marginal costs. Since marginal benefits have decreased, you stop producing earlier. It’s possible for the government to increase taxes and increase revenue, so long as the cut in production is not too much. That’s arguably the case here.

    It’s even more possible if those in the higher tax bracket receive marginal benefits from things other than the money they earn. Lots of people who make lots of money simply enjoy working. They’re work-aholics.

    In that case, the distortion to the economy would be ever less.

  61. #641856
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:53 pm, hunter said:

    It seems you’re arguing that the government will have to raise taxes for lower brackets if the top bracket goes Galt.

    I don’t really think that’s obvious. Going Galt doesn’t mean stopping production altogether. It simply means cutting back on production to the point where your marginal benefits = marginal costs. Since marginal benefits have decreased, you stop producing earlier. It’s possible for the government to increase taxes and increase revenue, so long as the cut in production is not too much. That’s arguably the case here.

    It’s even more possible if those in the higher tax bracket receive marginal benefits from things other than the money they earn. Lots of people who make lots of money simply enjoy working. They’re work-aholics.

    In that case, the distortion to the economy would be ever less.

    Your ignorance is stunning. Not even worth debating you on this.

  62. #641857
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:53 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    And an actual milk man that wore a white uniform and delivered the milk in funny shaped glass bottles. Memories. :)

  63. #641858
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:53 pm, jjmurphy said:

    bluesoc – With all the “producers gone, who is going to hire you?

  64. #641862
    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:58 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, bluesoc said:

    My point is that even if those in the highest tax bracket go galt, it doesn’t mean that the work will simply disappear. Those in the lower tax brackets will be in higher demand, and thus have more incentive to work more (because they’ll get paid more).

    That is absurd. You must not have ever studied economics.

    Who is going to pay the lower tax bracketers to do any work?

    Those in the highest tax brackets are the ones that invest capital into business. They will flee the country, just like the did France, Cuba, the Soviet Union, Sweden, the UK (pre-Thatcher), etc.

    Unemployment under confiscatory collectivist countries always goes to stratospheric levels. Make it confiscatory enough and eventually the only employer left is the government, and standards of living drop to slavery levels.

  65. #641866
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:02 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:50 pm, bluesoc said:

    It’s even more possible if those in the higher tax bracket receive marginal benefits from things other than the money they earn. Lots of people who make lots of money simply enjoy working. They’re work-aholics.

    Fine, why don’t you come over to my house and do work for me for my belly lint? I’ll lock you in the basement and feed you scraps. Once in a while I’ll take you for a walk. But don’t get used to any liberties I grant you – after all, you are a work-a-holic and aren’t working for money.

    You just love the work.

    The utter stunning arrogance of your assumptions! The complete and total disregard for anyone’s liberty is completely disgusting!

  66. #641867
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:03 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:53 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    sky, I helped get this small glass bottle milk plant in NE Nebraska up and running. Neat stuff!

    http://hartington.net/?p=702

  67. #641872
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, happyscrapper said:

    sky, I helped get this small glass bottle milk plant in NE Nebraska up and running. Neat stuff!

    Did you really, Hunter? Cool. I do miss those old glass bottles! Funny story… My mother, the next-door neighbor, and the lady on the corner all had left-handed boys born within a month of each other! We went so far as to ask the milkman if he was left-handed because it was always fun to blame the milkman on everything. Turns out, he WAS! Fortunately, none of the boys looked like him.

  68. #641873
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:18 pm, Laree said:

    Is Joy Behar the dumbest woman in the world? Can we get a special tax just for her a dumb as doorknob tax.

  69. #641875
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:26 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, happyscrapper said:

    That is a great story!

  70. #641879
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Is Joy Behar the dumbest woman in the world?

    Hmm, Rosie and Rosanne might have opinions here…

  71. #641880
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, Boomer said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, happyscrapper said:

    When my wife was a baby my father-in-law used to joke that she was Sam the milkmans child. One Sunday at church he was talking to a man that commented how cute Mrs. Boomer was as a baby and he gave his standard line. It turned out he was their milkman and his name was Sam. :lol:

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒE (mo-lone lah-veh) Translation: Come and take them!

  72. #641889
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:13 pm, Papa Louie said:

    Whoopi said:
    …they have this whole thing about taxing “the wealthy. Okay. Now, I don’t mind that. I don’t mind paying a little more tax ’cause I make a good living. But I don’t want to get it coming and going.

    Is Whoopi beginning to hope Obama will fail?

    It’s rapidly becoming clear that the current administration is not the next Camilot, and Obama is not Kennedy. There is nothing similar about their tax policies. The following quote makes that abundantly clear:

    An economy hampered by restrictive tax rates will never produce enough revenue to balance our budget, just as it will never produce enough jobs or enough profits.
    — President John F. Kennedy, 1962

  73. #641890
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:13 pm, nlebou said:

    So what? I remember ice boxes.

    Me too, and hand crank washing machines.

  74. #641895
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:31 pm, Mach1Duck said:

    Not to worry about everyone going Galt. When people find out there is no incentive to working to get ahead, the whole system will Galtize.

  75. #641899
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:38 pm, Joy said:

    Why yes, when the rich stop producing and investing, someone else will simply get promoted to rich, because, like, rich is just another job, right?

    Leftists shouldn’t even try to think…

  76. #641900
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:38 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, Boomer said:
    On March 6th, 2009 at 8:17 pm, happyscrapper said:
    When my wife was a baby my father-in-law used to joke that she was Sam the milkmans child. One Sunday at church he was talking to a man that commented how cute Mrs. Boomer was as a baby and he gave his standard line. It turned out he was their milkman and his name was Sam.

    Ha! Good story! Those poor milkmen really did get picked on. But just think, they came to your house every other day, and if you weren’t home, they had permission to walk right in and put your cold stuff in the fridge. They had access to your house and access to the wife too! Hmmmm….

  77. #641905
    On March 6th, 2009 at 9:48 pm, Joy said:

    Happyscrapper – I was very young, but I remember the milkman just walking in the house and putting the milk and the Black Cherry drink in the fridge. But I also remember him leaving right away too. lol

  78. #641908
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:00 pm, lottadawg said:

    The last time I checked I am still free, a private citizen, and in spite of all rewrites by liberals our Constitution is clearly balanced with the emphasis on citizens rights and freedom, and all the checks on the government side of the scale.
    In light of what is happening it is your duty to “Go Galt” or disrupt whatever passive aggressive means you can to help affect a government that is clearly out of control. Obama’s regime has not only lost sight of the meaning of the same constitution, it is acting exactly contrary to its intent.
    Whatever you can do to fight back is as Patriotic as you can get.
    Can anyone tell me about the last time anyone one in the Democratic party actually addressed “Individual Freedom, Individual property rights, or States Rights”. With this bunch those just don’t seem to exist.

  79. #641909
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:01 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Joyce Behar is an ignoramus-maximus.

    “He [Obama] voted against the war”.

    Calm down sweet cheeks, Obama opposed the war, he didn’t vote against it. He wasn’t in the Senate at the time the Iraq War was voted on, remember?

    Kindly remove head from your posterior – THEN talk.

  80. #641910
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:05 pm, GraniteMan said:

    My wife says we can’t afford cube steak. Instead she serves what she calls round steak. But I noticed the casing it came in said Balogna. Please sir, may I have some more porridge?

  81. #641911
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I wish I could stay and talk, but my grandson is staying overnight and my computer is in his room! G’night all.

  82. #641916
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:15 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Welcome to the party Whoopi. Could it be that she gets it?

  83. #641920
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:15 pm, Flyoverman said:
    Welcome to the party Whoopi. Could it be that she gets it?

    No she does not.

  84. #641922
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:20 pm, skysoljr82 said:

    sky, I helped get this small glass bottle milk plant in NE Nebraska up and running. Neat stuff!

    How cool is that! But peach flavored milk? It takes me back though. I remember in the summers, I had a kool-aid/lemonade stand and I could always count on the milkman for a nickle for a cup of lemonade. He had to talk to me because I was using the ice box for the milk as a seat for my stand.Simpler times.

  85. #641927
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:30 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    freebiebabe said, “Joyce Behar is an ignoramus-maximus.”

    Not to mention a gluteous maximus.One big, ginormous maximus!

  86. #641929
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, hunter said:

    No she does not.

    Sorry. It’s all the little voices in my head that made me write that.

  87. #641931
    On March 6th, 2009 at 10:47 pm, feebiebabe said:

    #84 – LMAO

    No “r” there RogerC, it’s Feebie. :)

    Half of this woman’s ignorant statements go completely uncorrected/unnoticed because she is usually squealing over other people’s conversations. Yaowwww!. But, oh well… The View seems to love their pet mental case.

    Wonder if ear plugs are made available to the View’s camera crew. The sound technician for that show must be driven to drink, daily.

  88. #641936
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:02 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 7:03 pm, regularguy said:

    How can Joy be so stunningly stupid?

    As with bluesoc practice, practice.
    Yes, soda jerks, milkmen, a 396 engine in my 1968 Super Sport Camaro. Still have the Camaro. Too bad no Double Eythal gasoline :( @#$%^&* liberal tree huggers screwed up that too the &*()+XYZ’s
    :cry:


    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  89. #641940
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:14 pm, Paul Revere said:

    Liberals are all for evolution unless it means people evolving to outsmart Obama and his lemmings…not that it’s hard to do.

  90. #641941
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:14 pm, rightisright said:

    When I see clips like that of the View or hear such stupidity, I get so pissed, then I think of what they said and my anger all goes away, realizing just how really stupid some people are.
    As Ron White says “ya can’t fix stupid”.

  91. #641942
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:15 pm, hunter said:

    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:02 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Go to a small local airport and barter for some airgas, I believe that it just might be the stuff you are looking for.

  92. #641947
    On March 6th, 2009 at 11:30 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Goldberg gave herself a coat hanger abortion pre-Roe, I know she is very proud of that.

    But by the time she was a teenager, New York and California (the state she lived in and the state she moved to) had already legalized abortion, so besides killing her baby, she is an idiot.

    (Abortion was already legal in some states before Roe, although most liberal idiots don’t know that).

    Anyway, as one of the queens of BDS and supporters of the Demonrats, she is one of the few ‘rich’ people I will enjoy seeing taxed out the wazoo.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Newt for 2012? No, thanks.

October 26, 2009 09:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

135 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Dallas Tea Party activists push back against Gingrich’s straw men

October 23, 2009 02:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Call them out.

Protesting the media culture of corruption

October 19, 2009 01:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Plus: Reuters punked. And a Balloon-Boy/media conspiracy?

A message from NY-23 conservative candidate Doug Hoffman

October 17, 2009 09:54 AM by Doug Hoffman

258 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

“It’s time for conservatives to show the Republican establishment who’s in charge.”

Dear RNC: What part of “NO” don’t you understand?

October 16, 2009 02:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

What up?!

Tea Party for Obama: A San Francisco treat

October 16, 2009 11:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 5 Trackbacks


Categories: Going Galt, Tea Party



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook