See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments

1. #101
   On March 7th, 2009 at 7:38 pm, flenser said:

   “Party on, Joe.”

   “Party on, Barry.”

   “Think the stock market will go up next week, Barry?’

   “Yeah, and monkeys might fly out my butt!”

2. #102
   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:29 pm, John Deaux said:

   On March 7th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, rfjjulie said:
   Arizona- I thought it was more along the lines of MD 2020.

   Wouldn’t drinking Mogen David wine offend muslims?

   More like Boone’s Farm.

3. #103
   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:34 pm, fulldroolcup said:

   x

4. #104
   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   Yikes! ABC News reporting Obama declaring US is losing in Afghanistan, plans to reach out to the Taliban for talks. We will soon be openly negotiating with terrorists. God help us.

   Hey if you can’t trust the Taliban, who can you trust? Right?

   Welcome back Carter! After all, there is nothing more endearing to our enemies than to show weakness. No wait! I misspoke! There is nothing more provocative to our enemies than to show weakness.

   How did that work in those South-side Chicago ‘hoods Obama organized in his prior career as community organizer? Aren’t they suffering through a monstrous wave of killings?

   Oh, well. I suppose being organized counts for something. Afghanistan will now be an organized killing field.

   What a mamby-pamby buffoon.

5. #105
   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:51 pm, Joy said:

   RetFireman – I have finally picked my jaw up off the floor from watching your link……..

   I came away with the take that he is insulting hussein and his followers in a BIG WAY. That said, it’s stupefying to see what some people are listening to at their churches without batting an eye. The woman in the background seemed to be taking notes and none of the men changed their expressions at all. Clearly they’ve heard ‘sermons’ like that before… UN-REAL……..

6. #106
   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:55 pm, Joy said:

   Pasedena – I only wish you’d saying, ‘Jus kidding!’, but I know you aren’t. It’s just what I’d expect from him.

   Yikes! ABC News reporting Obama declaring US is losing in Afghanistan, plans to reach out to the Taliban for talks. We will soon be openly negotiating with terrorists. God help us.

7. #107
   On March 7th, 2009 at 9:18 pm, Jamson64 said:

   Bill Ayers will be a consultant.

8. #108
   On March 7th, 2009 at 9:22 pm, swede said:

   On March 7th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   Geez. Now I wish he’d just stay in the WH and party.

9. #109
   On March 7th, 2009 at 9:30 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

   Joy. Here is the part that really annoys me. It’s a tactic Obama uses when being criticized by conservatives:

   “Mr. Obama dismissed criticism from conservatives that he was driving the country toward socialism… actions have been “entirely consistent with free-market principles” and… large-scale government intervention in the markets and expansion of social welfare programs began under President George W. Bush.”

   See my problem? He uses “began under Bush” to respond to conservative criticisms. Do you ever hear any RINOs call him on it? No. The GOP is still being led by Hannitized RINOs who also use “Republican” and “conservative” interchangeably.

   It is a very important distinction to make because it cuts to the heart of the problem we conservatives have with the GOP. We better start making this distinction soon if we hope to take these tax protests all the way.

   This GOP is stupefyingly lame. Conservatives must either seize control of the GOP soon or else unite behind a new party.

10. #110
    On March 7th, 2009 at 9:54 pm, Sea_Dog said:

    Just George and Louise movin on up and settin an example for all the little people.

11. #111
    On March 7th, 2009 at 9:57 pm, Sea_Dog said:

    On March 7th, 2009 at 9:30 pm, Pasadena Phil said:
    … Conservatives must either seize control of the GOP soon or else unite behind a new party.

    I’m all for a Federalist Party following the Jefersonian and Adams view of the role of the Federal Govt.

12. #112
    On March 7th, 2009 at 10:24 pm, sbw999 said:

    Leave the Royal Family alone.

13. #113
    On March 7th, 2009 at 10:37 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    We will just have to throw them out and take our government back. Simple.

14. #114
    On March 7th, 2009 at 10:48 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On March 7th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, rfjjulie said:

    Arizona- I thought it was more along the lines of MD 2020.

    http://www.bumwine.com/md2020.html

    For formal occasions yes, of course the good stuff.

    —
    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

15. #115
    On March 7th, 2009 at 11:07 pm, Joy said:

    We will just have to throw them out and take our government back. Simple.

    You forgot the “/sarc” tag… if it were that simple, we wouldn’t be in this mess to begin with.

    Pasedena – You will never see me call myself a Republican. I haven’t in quite some time. I am a conservative and yes, the two are quite different.

    As to seizing conrol, there aren’t enough true conservatives left to seize anything. I don’t see much unity on the right at this point although action is finally awakening. And not enough people see the real danger in what is happening. To most it appears to be nothing but a blip on the radar and all will be okay soon. Just politics.

    I keep asking the question, and haven’t seen a response yet, and I’m sure many think me totally out there for even asking… but I’ll ask again.

    At what precise point in time should the Germans have recognized the evil and stopped Hitler? And how? Hindsight is 20/20, but hindsight is also too late. Only time will tell if I’m an alarmist lunatic or not.

16. #116
    On March 7th, 2009 at 11:19 pm, rfjjulie said:

    Joy-

    At what precise point in time should the Germans have recognized the evil and stopped Hitler? And how? Hindsight is 20/20, but hindsight is also too late. Only time will tell if I’m an alarmist lunatic or not.

    I don’t think you are an alarmist or a lunitic. I would say realist. If we don’t do something immediately to take back our county, all will be lost. Let us look to the Constitution and our Founding Fathers and “show some sack” so to speak. We need to stand up against tyranny.

17. #117
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:04 am, TomB said:

    Surely Bush parties were tasteful and not extravagant. Oh wait, I just read that just before they left office, the Bush group ordered $100,000 worth of dishes.

    Actually it was about $566K for two sets: one private and one for state functions. The existing china was Clinton-era and due for replacement. It was funded privately by the White House Historical Association Acquisition Trust. See Leaving the White House.

18. #118
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:00 am, RetFireman said:

    Joy:

    The Rev. was being hyper-critical of Der Fuhrer and of his followers. He has been taking a great deal of heat for pointing out the obvious. It seems that the community of Obama apologists and supporters cannot stand to have a mirror placed in front of them and being shown for who and what they are.

    All thepeople who are even attempting to bring up President Bush as a comparison to what Der Fuhrer is doing are dong nothing more than, once again, demonstrating their deep ignorance as to what the truth of the matter was about the Bush Administration as well as what their false god and Lady MacBeth are doing.

    Just what kinds of friends and supporters do they have where Lady MacBeth needs to beg them not to damage items in the White House?

    It is clear that Der Fuhrer and his power-hungry bride have absolutely no respect for this country, it’s history or it’s people, but are the people they surround themselves with really just that stupid and careless and ignorant as to how to act, what to do and how to respect the White House, what it means, what it symbolizes throughout the world and just how valuable and priceless as well as irreplaceable the things in the White House are?

    Just how ghetto are these parties?

    Do these imbeciles who are still deluded enough to apologize for and make excuses for these two Shakespearean characters occupying the People’s House really believe that they should be throwing extravagant parties every single night on the tax payers dime? Do they really believe that Bush did anything even remotely close to what they are doing? Do they even know just how few State Dinners Bush even had during the eight years he was President?

    My God…the millions and millions of dollars this buffoon has spent on himself and his wife since he usurped the office is breaking records, and is so obnoxious that even the media is noticing and mentioning it. Does anyone really believe for one nano-second that he has done a damn thing to warrant a single solitary party, let alone one every night?

    And are people really so stupid as to believe he does not drink at these things when there was a picture on this very site this morning showing him holding up an enormous glass of wine?

    While this country is supposedly so hideously bad off and having the hardest time since 1929 (you may have to look up that date to know what I am referring to, LGM) these people are partying like they are some French Monarch from the 18th Century.

    Well, we all know what happened to those monarchs, don’t we? Looks like yet again, the Liberals are showing an incredible ignorance when it comes to history and learning from it.

    How much longer will these amateurs at the helm of this country be allowed to get away with this?

    This all can end rather quickly, if the courts would enforce the Constitution and force him to provide his actual birth certificate. Not the BS “live birth” garbage he showed on his site, but the actual birth certificate that he flew all the way to Hawaii under the lie of visiting his dying grandmother (without bringing his daughters, I might add, so they could say their good-byes) to seal and hide from the public. And having shown it, arresting each and every person with knowledge of the fraud he committed against this country. THAT would be justice served.

19. #119
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:10 am, RetFireman said:

    Actually it was about $566K for two sets: one private and one for state functions. The existing china was Clinton-era and due for replacement. It was funded privately by the White House Historical Association Acquisition Trust. See Leaving the White House.

    Every single President has their very own China pattern. They have all picked out a new one that is used for official dinners and such.

    Anyone who is carrying on about the Bush’s having one is only showing they don’t really know what they are talking about.

    The China is then put in the archives. It really is not that difficult to look it up. Why, I would be willing to bet with just a couple of seconds on Google, you can find what every President’s patterns looked like dating way, waaaay back.

20. #120
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:13 am, RetFireman said:

    Awww heck…I took 15 seconds out of my life and did the work for you.

21. #121
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:18 am, RetFireman said:

    If you are an alarmist and/or a lunatic, then so am I. However, the reality is, we aren’t. They should have recognized and stopped him after reading “Mein Kampf” In that book, Hitler told the world EXACTLY what it was he had planned for Germany, the Jews and the entire world.

    So, just when should they have stopped Obama and Lady MacBeth? In 1995, right after they read his first “auto”-biography that had been ghost written by an unrepentant, admitted terrorist.

    It still is not too late, but unfortunately it will be very, very messy.

22. #122
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:53 am, GaMidnightRider said:

    I am glad to hear someone is calling them on all these parties. It make me upset when i found out that B. Hussiein Obama was telling us to cut back and then had the gall to turn the heat up to 75 in the white house. Could he not put on a sweater like the rest of us? He seems to think that he can say one thing and do another.

23. #123
    On March 8th, 2009 at 4:01 am, RetFireman said:

    He seems to think that he can say one thing and do another.

    That is the very definition of “Liberal”…not to mention the Politburo

24. #124
    On March 8th, 2009 at 7:19 am, happyscrapper said:

    So, I guess they plan to party like it’s 1984.

25. #125
    On March 8th, 2009 at 7:44 am, Sea_Dog said:

    Unfortunately, history when taught (or if taught) is usually a memorization of dates/events, not the why. Jeff Shara(sp?) opened my mind with his psych-histories of the Revolution and Civil Wars (both of which, I admit [and I apologize to the long suffering Mrs. Sims of the GCHS History Dept] hating to learn about). Read these and Samuel Adam to understand what the founding fathers went through to give us what we have, a noble experiment of man. I think the GOP as a party of political influence is dead as the acronym as been so damaged that it may never be able to recover. I repeat my earlier post, that what is needed is a new party built around the core of the founding fathers beliefs of limited federal government, a revision of the tax code – perhaps a national sales tax to replace the current (though that will throw gobs of accountants and tax lawyers onto the pile of the unemployed).

26. #126
    On March 8th, 2009 at 7:50 am, Dimsdale said:

    Ret, I worship at your philosophical altar!

    You make exquisite sense and make me laugh out loud at the same time.

    I bet you do it without teleprompters too!

27. #127
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am, travlinman said:

    On March 7th, 2009 at 1:47 pm, goodforlaughs said:
    …the lovely “toned arms” michelle (Obama)…

    Now that the Obama’s are enjoying the ‘spoils of victory’, can’t we let them afford a trainer to work on Michelle’s bottom half? Compared to her ‘toned’ arms, her booty needs some serious work-out time!

28. #128
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:29 am, Dimsdale said:

    Maybe Obama likes her that way…..

29. #129
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am, jangar said:

    Baby got back.

30. #130
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:39 am, jangar said:

    Bottom line is – this bunch are hypocritical clowns, lacking principles, common sense and morals. Like spoiled children, not raised up right.

31. #131
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:46 am, Savage24 said:

    Now we know why he had all those Roman columns at his acceptance speech in Denver.Obama is the modern day Nero.

32. #132
    On March 8th, 2009 at 9:06 am, jangar said:

    Savage24 – and a heaping load of self-important.

33. #133
    On March 8th, 2009 at 11:08 am, Stubby said:

    The Obamas are acting like a young, poor couple who just inherited a paid-off residence, refinanced and are on a spending spree, behaving like they have never had any cents.

34. #134
    On March 8th, 2009 at 11:30 am, shooter said:

    The social calendar suggests a return to the days of Camelot, ANIMAL HOUSE” the report said.

    Obama, hussein and the bitter one, have turned the White House into a bad Eddie Murphy/Belushi/Moms Mabley ‘B’ movie with out the humor.

    The entire obamanation with barry leading is an EMBARRASSMENT to the country. All past presidents must be rolling over in their graves with fear and anger at this insolence.

35. #135
    On March 8th, 2009 at 12:06 pm, pueblo1032 said:

    At the risk of sounding RAAACCCIIISSST… This WH is beginning to look like a scene from TRADING PLACES… The one in which MURPHY invites the whole bar to his NEW DIGS… “Whose been puttin’ their COALS out on my flo’???

36. #136
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, akoypinoy said:

    OT

    White House budget director Peter Orszag says the Obama administration isn’t happy with the billions of dollars aimed at lawmakers’ pet projects — also known as earmarks. Obama had campaigned on changing the way such money is appropriated by Congress.

    Yet Orszag says Obama doesn’t want to revisit the spending bill Congress put together before he was elected and wants to move on. Next year, according to Orszag, when Obama is fully involved in the next budget from the start, earmarks will be handled differently.

    Obama’s budget chief appeared Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

    This was in USA today. Now we know who’s actually running the country – N. Pelosi and her deputy H. Reid – and O-BUM-A is just the puppet in a string.

37. #137
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Yet Orszag says Obama doesn’t want to revisit the spending bill Congress put together before he was elected and wants to move on. Next year, according to Orszag, when Obama is fully involved in the next budget from the start, earmarks will be handled differently.

    That is really dumb. The bill hasn’t passed yet, but will, on HIS watch. The spending will be during HIS administration (and also the administrations of our grandchildren and great-grandchildren). He needs to veto it until the earmarks come off. What a stinking liar! And yes, he is a pelosi puppet, no doubt about it!

38. #138
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    The KBPOTUS just a string puppet for pelosi and reid? I think you doth insult the string puppets too much-I doth think he’s more of muppet from the Childrens Television Workshop! (Zoe being the more approbiate one!)

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

39. #139
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Dimsdale-
    Go back to MM past posts for some other Retfireman’s philosophical gems. He’s been spot on faster than an engine company responding to a 8-alarm fire at 3 am!

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

    RetFireman-The offer still stands for BBQ in Memphis!

40. #140
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, happyscrapper said:

    By the way, even with all his partying, Obama has found time to screw the conservatives yet again. He is going to reverse Pres. Bush’s bill outlawing federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. I haven’t totally made up my mind on that subject…for the embryos that already exist and will be destroyed anyway. But I can’t understand why the Federal Government should FUND this!! The research is already being done in private industry, where it belongs. Obama’s timing is perfect for him, as it will open up a whole new week of distracting the public from the issue of his socialising the country. Last week, Limbaugh. This week, stem cell research. Anyone care to guess what next week’s issue will be? Maybe Obama will perform some other amazing and astounding feat so that the MSM will spend another week worshiping at his feet and totally ignoring the fact the our Country is disintegrating. And by the way, I hold the MSM personally responsible for this mess…they covered up for this man and got him elected. Traitors, every one!

41. #141
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Go back to MM past posts for some other Retfireman’s philosophical gems. He’s been spot on faster than an engine company responding to a 8-alarm fire at 3 am!

    How do we go back and find posts for one particular person? I don’t know how to do that, but would like to read Retireman’s posts! Or do we just need to browse through and search for them?

42. #142
    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, RetFireman said:

    Now THIS is some quality reading for a Sunday morning/afternoon. Ever wonder just how many lies Der Fuhrer has broken since taking over as messiah for the unwashed (SERIOUSLY unwashed…dowsing yourself in patchouli oil is not the same thing) and historically and politically ignorant and mislead masses?

    Well, according to this, by December 8, 2008, more than a month before he took his very own version of the Oath of Office…the first time…158.

    How many more since? Wow…I mean, that would take some sort of Stephen Hawking type brilliance to count…so who knows. But here is a short list from then.

    I leave it to LGM, Ideludemyselfbyclaimingtolovemycountrywhileworkingagainstit, and the rest of the apologists to attempt to justify and rationalize them. That alone will be entertainment for the rest of the day.

    Obama’s Documented Lies: 158 and remarkably still growing

43. #143
    On March 8th, 2009 at 2:02 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Retireman’s

    Sorry I fractured your moniker, RetFireman! Won’t happen again.

44. #144
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:20 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    But I can’t understand why the Federal Government should FUND this!! The research is already being done in private industry, where it belongs.

    This type of research should be done by private industry and government has no business here. If embryonic stem cell research was so promising, don’t you think the venture capitalists would be tripping over themselves to fund this? Same way they do with other cutting edge technologies?

    The only kind of stem cell therapy that has worked with success has been by using adult stem cells. But of course, you’ll never hear about that in the MSM. Let’s put the money on things that have worked:

    February 2009

    UCLA researchers published their results in February issue of the Bentham Open Stem Cell Journal which outlines the long term results of the trial.

    “We have documented the first successful adult neural stem cell transplantation to reverse the effects of Parkinson’s disease and demonstrated the long term safety and therapeutic effects of this approach,” says lead author Dr. Michel Levesque.

    The paper describes how Levesque’s team was able to isolate patient-derived neural stem cells, multiply them in vitro and ultimately differentiate them to produce mature neurons before they are reintroduced into the brain.

    The team was able to inject the adult stem cells without the need for immunosuppressants. Unlike embryonic stem cells, adult stem cell injections don’t cause a patient’s immune system to reject the cells.

    The adult stem cells were highly beneficial for the patient involved in the study.

    “Of particular note are the striking results this study yielded — for the five years following the procedure the patient’s motor scales improved by over 80% for at least 36 months,” Levesque wrote.

45. #145
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, Bruce said:

    yo yo yoooo … sa black thang – yall wunt unnerstan! Gotta has the flash, D! Gotta has the flash! Ya unnerstand wut am talkin about? PAR-TAYYY!!!!

46. #146
    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, Tazed and Confused said:

    Hey Obie kind sir… how ’bout tossin’ some of yur bling-bling my way… us unemployed leaders of your “new economy” need more than jus’ a free ride…

    what I’ sayin’ is… the best things in life are free but you can leave them for the birds and bees… I want bling-bling that’s what I want party dude.

47. #147
    On March 8th, 2009 at 4:14 pm, TomB said:

    On March 8th, 2009 at 3:10 am, RetFireman said:

    Actually it was about $566K for two sets: one private and one for state functions. The existing china was Clinton-era and due for replacement. It was funded privately by the White House Historical Association Acquisition Trust. See Leaving the White House.

    Every single President has their very own China pattern. They have all picked out a new one that is used for official dinners and such.

    Anyone who is carrying on about the Bush’s having one is only showing they don’t really know what they are talking about.

    The China is then put in the archives. It really is not that difficult to look it up. Why, I would be willing to bet with just a couple of seconds on Google, you can find what every President’s patterns looked like dating way, waaaay back.

    Right again. So now that we’ve settled that can we get back to the original question of how the current presidential partay policy is being funded?

48. #148
    On March 8th, 2009 at 5:56 pm, JHSII said:

    “This party atmosphere sends the wrong message to the American people. As the Obama-Clinton crowd party on, the American people are suffering greatly,” Klayman said.

    I don’t see how it sends the wrong message at all.
    I mean, who better than our betters to show us how much better they are than by having expensive parties while we can barely afford to pay the bills??

    “If the peasants do not have Wagyu, then let them eat Spam!” – The One

49. #149
    On March 8th, 2009 at 6:26 pm, vickisoup said:

    Negotiating with the Taliban. Unbelievable. Truly unbelievable. But true, I know. What is wrong with the Dems? Really?? What is wrong with the Dems??

50. #150
    On March 8th, 2009 at 6:57 pm, xler8bmw said:

    Sorry someone has to say it. They are no better than the hip hop idiots coming out of the ghetto when their first album makes it big!

    It’s just a matter of time O is wearing bling!

    It also, shows he and the misses aren’t very cultured and this is the first time on the town! Unfortunately it is at our expense!

    This needs to be investigated!

51. #151
    On March 8th, 2009 at 7:55 pm, Dimsdale said:

    On March 8th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Dimsdale-
    Go back to MM past posts for some other Retfireman’s philosophical gems. He’s been spot on faster than an engine company responding to a 8-alarm fire at 3 am!

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

    RetFireman-The offer still stands for BBQ in Memphis!

    I consider RetFireman the anti-lgm..

52. #152
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:39 pm, Joy said:

    A little off topic…….

    HERE is the whole article. Excerpt:

    The phone call came after the president was asked aboard his plane: “Are you a socialist as some people have suggested?”

    He was clear in his first answer: “You know, let’s take a look at the budget – the answer would be no.”

    “Is there anything wrong with saying, ‘Yes’?” a Times reporter pressed.

    “Let’s just take a look at what we’ve done,” Obama said, ticking off efforts his administration has made to stabilize the economy. But he acknowledged that, as he told Joe the Plumber, he plans to try to spread the wealth around.

    I love how leftists can never admit to what they believe. Hussein refused o answer the question with a ‘NO.’ Leftists have to rely on deception to get their policies in place.

    A person can call a chair a piano, but it’s still a chair. Hussein can call it whatever he wants, it’s still Socialism and he’s afraid to come out and say it.

53. #153
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:44 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Why, how tyically ghetto of them. I have a question. Is any one really surprised by Obama’s behavior and that of his “brood?” He is exactly what I expected. No.Surprise.

54. #154
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:45 pm, RetFireman said:

    Looks like I got nabbed in the filter. Should I be honored or embarrassed by that?

55. #155
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, Joy said:

    Nabbed by the filter?

    WordPress eats any post with more than two links and throws it in a spam folder. I have a small photo site and I get TONS of spam, so I can only imagine how much MM’s site gets. For her to find real posts in all that would be quite difficult. I never even check my spam folder any more.

56. #156
    On March 8th, 2009 at 8:52 pm, Joy said:

    Misscheryl – I’m not surprised either by any of hussein’s actions. As repugnant as they are, they are quite expected.

57. #157
    On March 8th, 2009 at 10:03 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    when it comes to comrade zero, not only is he a socialist coward, but as the old saying goes, you can take the s–t out of the neighborhood and put it in the WH but it’ll always be only s–t.

58. #158
    On March 8th, 2009 at 10:15 pm, RetFireman said:

    Don’t be trippin, yo. He jus’ be keepin it real. Don’t be all playa hatin.

59. #159
    On March 8th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, RetFireman said:

    I had 4 links in my post, so that would explain it.

    Hopefully someone will rescue it from the abyss, but if not, I guess it wasn’t meant to be posted.

    I did say thanks for the compliments and they were making me blush as I was not used to such things.

60. #160
    On March 8th, 2009 at 10:27 pm, rooster said:

    Surprise, surprise, surprise! Any mention of Ayers, Wright or our Kenyan Bastard in Chiefs citizenship is immediately deleted on Obama’s Wikipedia page and the offending author is banned for 3 days.
    Change my ASS!
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91114

61. #161
    On March 8th, 2009 at 11:38 pm, RogersUmp said:

    Pueblo…that’s exactly what I was picturing too!! “Whose been puttin’ out their coals on my flo’?” Man, we got Bill Ray Valentine in the White House except Billy Ray understood the markets.

62. #162
    On March 9th, 2009 at 12:50 am, RetFireman said:

    Considering that Wikipedia is one of the biggest Liberal run sites on the net, and is just as famous for having completely wrong information as it is for having completely biased information, is anyone surprised at all that there are any number of Blueshirts monitoring his bio making sure that is remains all fluffy and nice without a hint of controversy or truth?

    Like I have said, once he is finally exposed as the usurping fraud that everyone knows he is, I look forward to the arrests and prosecution of any and all people who had anything, no matter how small, to do with perpetrating what will become the largest act of treason in the history of civilization. That would include just about every Democrat and RINO in both houses, and would guarantee the death of Liberalism in this country.

    They gambled with everything they had when they backed him. They decided it was worth losing everything, and now it is time that the Supreme Court give the men and women serving in the Military their day in court. They have paid enough already, let their case be heard and stop throwing it out before the damage is irreversible.

63. #163
    On March 9th, 2009 at 1:24 am, MaddMike said:

    This partying thing cannot be true.

    I just read “sources close to the White House… have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.”

    So how could he….

    Oh. Never mind.

64. #164
    On March 9th, 2009 at 10:36 am, Salt said:

    Have they even paid for the Chicago party yet?

65. #165
    On March 9th, 2009 at 11:13 am, akoypinoy said:

    On March 8th, 2009 at 10:03 pm, no2pcbs1 said:
    when it comes to comrade zero, not only is he a socialist coward, but as the old saying goes, you can take the s–t out of the neighborhood and put it in the WH but it’ll always be only s–t

    How about: A monkey in a tuxedo will always be monkey or You can take the monkey out of the jungle but you can’t take the jungle out of the monkey!

66. #166
    On March 9th, 2009 at 12:15 pm, bruins90210 said:

    I have to admit, I don’t really care about these parties. As best I can tell, they’re chump change compared to everything else he’s spending. I’m more concerned with the purely fraudulent claim that the lying bamster is going to “save” two trillion over 10 years by not spending money that was never intended to be spent, or that the economy is going to grow by 5.5% in 2011. That’s just pure BS.

67. #167
    On March 9th, 2009 at 12:50 pm, kthomas8268 said:

    Whooo HOO – Obama say “We’re gonna party like it’s 2012″!

    Doesn’t have the same ring to it like Prince’s song 1999

68. #168
    On March 9th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Yep, this sounds like you people – stupid.

69. #169
    On March 9th, 2009 at 6:01 pm, RetFireman said:

    On March 9th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Yep, this sounds like you people – stupid.

    Boy, you sure can always count on LGm and IHMC to live up to the Liberal playbook of always having absolutely nothing intelligent to say unless it is something completely irrelevant and/or childish.

    Great argument there…really, really deep and insightful. Your wealth of knowledge is mind-boggling…truly, truly mind-boggling. You must really make your mom happy that she allows you to live in her basement.