Air Pelosi

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 10, 2009 01:32 PM

Judicial Watch has a new trove of FOIA docs on Queen Nancy’s military air travel.

Read ‘em all here.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Nancy Pelosi

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, jwm said:

    No surprise from this Bay Area citizen.I don’t see much difference between her and any other politician. That’s why I hate all politicians. Thieves and liars, all of them.

  2. #2
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The documents also detail correspondence from intermediaries for Speaker Pelosi issuing demands for certain aircraft and expressing outrage when requested military planes were not available. “It is my understanding there are no G5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable…The speaker will want to know where the planes are…”

    These people really are a trip. Thanks Pelosi’s district for an idiot…

  3. #3
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Well, it isn’t like there are non-stop commercial flights from IAD to SFO.

    What choice does the poor girl have?

  4. #4
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    8 non-stops a day on United.

  5. #5
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:42 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Well, it isn’t like there are non-stop commercial flights from IAD to SFO

    My goodness! We can’t have Her Majesty and her retinue rubbing elbows and breathing the same recycled air as the peons public can we?

  6. #6
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    What choice does the poor girl have?

    Free for me, not for thee. :)

  7. #7
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:46 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    I don’t think that Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House), Harry Reid (Senate leader), Joe Biden (Vice President), or Barack Obama (President) should ever travel on a commercial airliner.
    ***
    Security and safety for them is more important than fuel savings and costs to the taxpayers.
    ***
    Ditto for their limo travel–a heavy fuel guzzling armored SUV should be used.
    ***
    There are probably terrorists and local kooks gunning for them 24/7. No more John F. Kennedy disaster, please.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  8. #8
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:47 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    8 non-stops a day on United.

    This reminds me, there are little airlines that get your Federal tax dollars to fly to airports near Congresslosers’ home towns – even though they are empty on those runs nearly all the time.

  9. #9
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:48 pm, Oink said:

    She makes me sick.

  10. #10
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, vinny said:

    why not just assign her a donkey for all future travel needs. After all, she is a Democrat.

  11. #11
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I don’t think that Nancy Pelosi (Speaker of the House), Harry Reid (Senate leader), Joe Biden (Vice President), or Barack Obama (President) should ever travel on a commercial airliner.

    Aside from disagreeing with you over Pelosi and Biden, Pelsosi is demanding bigger jets, available every weekend whether she needs them or not, crews driving in, fueling and prepping the planes then cancelling, complaining when the planes she wants are not available, taking extended family members on junkets….

  12. #12
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Hey, lay off…how is she suppose to know when Obama will come down with a case of the sniffles or campaign exhaustion…

    Having to be SOTH AND POTUS pro tem must be rough… /sarc/

  13. #13
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:51 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    oops, sorry, meant Reid not Biden… :)

  14. #14
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:54 pm, walterc said:

    For President (CIC of the armed forces) and VP, I can see your point Rocketman, but Pelosi and Reid are just two of 535 members of congress. In the event of an assassination or other injury, someone can step up and spend more money.

    And I personally see no need for any member of Congress to travel to foreign countries at taxpayer expense. The executive branch has plenty of professionals in every agency that can give Congress all the facts it needs regarding any issue. In the event of a national emergency that we have to have them in Washington, we can send a C130 (or any other type of aircraft) from numerous bases to transport them.

  15. #15
    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, ajmontana said:

    Why doesn’t she just use her Broom? :shock:

  16. #16
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, flmom said:

    Why doesn’t she just use her Broom?

    Heh. Probably waiting for the Nimbus 2009 model.

  17. #17
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Fuller said:

    Put her a$$ in the cargo hold disguised as a pig. She rates no special privileges in my book.

  18. #18
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:06 pm, iamsaved said:

    What’s even more outrageous is the fact that she and her husband are millionaires many times over – guess they’re too cheap to be patriotic and foot the bill when a govt aircraft isn’t available. Maybe the trip wasn’t worth taking in the first place. Democrats = OPM

  19. #19
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:07 pm, feebiebabe said:

    Why doesn’t she just use her Broom?

    She had to give it up, when the wind changed – that’s really how she got her permanent “surprise” face.

    Sad story.

  20. #20
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:08 pm, SPCOlympics said:

    I think the USAF should reserve a DC-3 for her, and only that. Flown by cadets. No jets. Or a Chinook.

    If she doesn’t like it, she can fly commercial and deal with random TSA cavity searches.

    Or ride Amtrak.

  21. #21
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    What a hypocrite she is.

    The DoD should be sending her the bill for the costs involved in those canceled flights. If the time span is over the course of a year, I’d bet the bill would approach a million dollars. I’d love to see her have to write that check.

  22. #22
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    And I personally see no need for any member of Congress to travel to foreign countries at taxpayer expense.

    Not Iraq or Afghanistan?

  23. #23
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, chapoutier said:

    I am willing to admit, btw, that Pelosi and Reid are disasters.

  24. #24
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, formerwm said:

    This is the problem with most of our elected officials. They think they are a special class of people and should be treated as such. They work for us!! Let Nancy fly coach like the rest of us smucks.

  25. #25
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:13 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    SPCOlympics said:

    I think the USAF should reserve a DC-3 for her, and only that. Flown by cadets. No jets. Or a Chinook.

    That beautiful machine is too good for her.

    She can use an O2-A. Maybe Danny Glover will fly her around.

  26. #26
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, ADyer said:

    I’m all for transporting Pelosi on military aircraft, but these multi-seat corporate jets are overkill. I think a more amenable solution would be to rig up some kind of a harness for her to be strapped to a weapon pylon on an F-16. Or instead, maybe modify a drop tank for the purpose. It can have a little window and everything. I’d call it the Pelosi Pod(TM).

    That way Madame Speaker can get where she needs with less expense, while at the same time giving a fighter pilot much needed training hours.

  27. #27
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, JohnS said:

    While I agree that the President shouldn’t fly commercial for security reasons, I don’t believe the same for the Speaker of the House or The Senate Majority Leader. These are certainly not irreplaceable people and maybe if they did fly on commercial once in a while they would be more in touch with everyday Americas. That being said these are elitist liberals who look down on you an me (remember Dingy Harry thinks we smell!). It is an outrage that they are telling corporate America not fly on private jets, yet Pelosi flys everywhere on one on our DIME!

  28. #28
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    strapped to a weapon pylon on an F-16.

    “Botox2, Botox2…”

  29. #29
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, Mookie said:

    Didn’t the travel on the military jet start with Dennis Hastert?

  30. #30
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:28 pm, tarpon said:

    Do as I say, not as I do.

    Pelosi — The mountaintop of hypocrisy.

  31. #31
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, Jeddite said:

    Hmmm, I’m no accountant, but I suspect that if the taxpayer’s paid for an entire row of 1st class seats for Nancy Pelosi during his travels, that would cost tens of thousands less than flying on a private jet.

    Heck, let’s buy Nancy three rows so that nobody is seated in a row directly in front/behind her either.

    Still bet it’s cheaper!

  32. #32
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, walterc said:

    chapoutier said:

    And I personally see no need for any member of Congress to travel to foreign countries at taxpayer expense.

    Not Iraq or Afghanistan?

    Why do they need to go to Iraq or Afghanistan? If they need a briefing, I’m sure we can find a general that can fill them in. If they need to shake hands with the troops, let them pay for it out of campaign funds.

  33. #33
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Wade said:

    The lowest private in the Army has more rights than this POS to use military transportation. If there is a hop and space let her ride, other than that. NOTA. Taxpayers pay for these jerks to govern this country and should stop all overseas junkets also.

  34. #34
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, tpitman said:

    If she doesn’t like it, she can fly commercial and deal with random TSA cavity searches.

    Good Lord, man, some of us just ate lunch and would like to keep it down!

  35. #35
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, chapoutier said:

    Why do they need to go to Iraq or Afghanistan? If they need a briefing, I’m sure we can find a general that can fill them in. If they need to shake hands with the troops, let them pay for it out of campaign funds.

    Wasn’t there a whole lot of hand wringing here abotu how Obama had not yet made a trip to Iraq at some point in the election?

  36. #36
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Chief RZ said:

    Budget demands? What, this costs money?!

    “She can’t make up her mind”. What else is new.

    Glad Judicial Watch was able to publish. I wonder what % of the population knows what she is?

  37. #37
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, Wade said:

    Why do they need to go to Iraq or Afghanistan? If they need a briefing, I’m sure we can find a general that can fill them in. If they need to shake hands with the troops, let them pay for it out of campaign funds.

    Here Here. With todays communications there is no need for them to leave their office other than pandering.

  38. #38
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:39 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Speaker Pelosi’s office requesting an Army escort and three military planes to transport Pelosi and other members of Congress to Cleveland, Ohio, for the funeral services of the late Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones.

    Excuse me, but does she really need an Army escort and three military planes to attend a funeral in OH?

    Learjet Liberal.

  39. #39
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    Wasn’t there a whole lot of hand wringing here abotu how Obama had not yet made a trip to Iraq at some point in the election?

    The difference is, Obama doesn’t care, and didn’t want to go to Iraq.

  40. #40
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, conservativesRus said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    Not Iraq or Afghanistan?

    And exactly what does a member of congress going to Iraq or Afghanistan accomplish?

  41. #41
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:42 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, Mookie said:

    Didn’t the travel on the military jet start with Dennis Hastert?

    Hastert didn’t need a military jet either. No member of congress requires military transportation for domestic travel.

    If they’re going overseas for approved fact-finding missions or other authorized trips, that a different story. It’s sometimes important for in person visits to conflict areas.

    In fact, I think Ms. Pelosi needs to go to Warizistan as soon as possible.

  42. #42
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Rus, I think if members of congress are going to vote on issues affecting our military operations, it can be useful for them to be able to have a representative go there in person. Not the whole of congress… but some number of reps need to see the place, not just hear about it on CNN and MSNBC.

  43. #43
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, chapoutier said:

    The difference is, Obama doesn’t care, and didn’t want to go to Iraq.

    Wait, so you want them to want to go but not let them go?

  44. #44
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:48 pm, chapoutier said:

    Excuse me, but does she really need an Army escort and three military planes to attend a funeral in OH?

    And other members of Congress. How many? Doesn’t say.

  45. #45
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:
    And other members of Congress. How many? Doesn’t say.

    No, it doesn’t say how many members, but an Army escort? I can see if she was going to a funeral in Iraq, but Ohio?

    Give me a break.

    Wait, so you want them to want to go but not let them go?

    Actually, I prefer Obama NOT go to Iraq knowing his non-support of the surge, etc. Why bother showing up if you have no confidence in our military?

  46. #46
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:53 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Adding to my last comment… that if they are expected to go to conflict areas, they should be in the custody of the military from the time they leave our soil. I don’t think we want to risk the safety of any elected official, even the ones we don’t like, in a hostile area.

    But if Pelosi wants to go to France to chat with her kindred spirits, that should be be on her dime.

  47. #47
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, happy2behere said:

    Private air travel is a lot of fun if you can get it. However, one could get hooked on it if not used judiciously. Seems like Madam Speaker is mainlining .

  48. #48
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Blame-Am-Last. I would agree that a visit to Iraq by Obama had little chance of him changing his opinion, as would a visit to Gitmo. In his case, I don’t think there was any objectivity. But, I still think they should be afforded the opportunity to go.

    Not all would agree, but that’s ok.

  49. #49
    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Mookie- Bush started that with Hastert post 9/11. Matter of fact, I think that is actually in the original thread comments.

    It isn’t just that Princess Botox flies military, it is that she reserves a flight every weekend, apparently, whether she intends to fly or not, and demands certain aircraft.

    Now that the War on Terror is officially over (the November election results would certainly imply that), commercial travel should be just as safe as military travel, and even a first class seat for Pelosi would be a lot cheaper than reserving a jet every weekend for her use, whether she needed it or not.

  50. #50
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:00 pm, ajmontana said:

    chapoutier said:
    I am willing to admit, btw, that Pelosi and Reid are disasters.

    There’s hope for you yet Chapstick.

  51. #51
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:04 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    But, I still think they should be afforded the opportunity to go.

    Sure, and grudgingly he went because his PR folks said he HAD to (he had an election to win!), not because he WANTED to. There’s a difference.

  52. #52
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:05 pm, T-Bone said:

    3rd in line for the POTUS. Not only are her constituents idiots (which is totaly understandable in SF) but apparently, there are some mentally challenged Democrats in Washington. What is it she has on them? There are hundreds to choose from and they choose her. Ze plane boss, Ze plane.

  53. #53
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:17 pm, sonofdy said:

    Over on huffpo they are crowing over daily show and how it is the only news source they trust. Seriously. Go look.

    No wonder these guys voted for the dumbo in chief.

  54. #54
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    I am willing to admit, btw, that Pelosi and Reid are disasters.

    Common. You left off Cary and (erp) Kennedy to say the least. Oh, and Obama (who was probably not present at the time you were looking for people on that list).

    I am with AJ, this small list and you being on our side concerning the 2nd Amendment – there is hope.

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, Mookie said:
    Didn’t the travel on the military jet start with Dennis Hastert?

    Great comment – if you were lgm.

  55. #55
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, happyscrapper said:

    The documents also detail correspondence from intermediaries for Speaker Pelosi issuing demands for certain aircraft and expressing outrage when requested military planes were not available. “It is my understanding there are no G5s available for the House during the Memorial Day recess. This is totally unacceptable…The speaker will want to know where the planes are…” wrote Kay King, Director of the House Office of Interparliamentary Affairs. In a separate email, when told a certain type of aircraft would not be available, King writes, “This is not good news, and we will have some very disappointed folks, as well as a very upset [s]peaker.”

    Pelosi, you dumba$$…YOU work for ME, and YOU’RE FIRED!

  56. #56
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, LOBOMAN said:

    “On March 10th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:
    Well, it isn’t like there are non-stop commercial flights from IAD to SFO.
    What choice does the poor girl have?”
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>.
    I think she should get her broom upgraded and use that for these important trips she makes………. AH

  57. #57
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, walterc said:

    chapoutier said:

    Wasn’t there a whole lot of hand wringing here abotu how Obama had not yet made a trip to Iraq at some point in the election?

    Again, pandering for votes. Anyone running for office that wants to go to a combat zone to get votes should pay for the trip out of campaign funds.

    And if congress needs to see what’s going on in a combat zone, ask the military information officers for a video report.

    I can’ speak for the current troops, but when I was in the Air Force, having a visit from congress took us away from performing the jobs we were there to do. These guys are there to fight muslim insurgents and they don’t need to take time out to baby sit a bunch of politicians and reporters on a PR mission.

    And I felt the same way about McCain, Hillary, Biden, Kerry etc etc etc visiting during the election.

    It’s not congress’s job to run the war. Declare it and fund it and leave the fighting to the Executive Branch. I’d rather spend our defense budget on bullets and body armor rather than airfare for congress.

  58. #58
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:28 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, chapoutier said:
    I am willing to admit, btw, that Pelosi and Reid are disasters.

    Gee, that’s swell of you, Chap. And what was your first clue?

  59. #59
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:28 pm, conservativesRus said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Rus, I think if members of congress are going to vote on issues affecting our military operations, it can be useful for them to be able to have a representative go there in person. Not the whole of congress… but some number of reps need to see the place, not just hear about it on CNN and MSNBC.

    I respectfully disagree. I understand Japan is not Iraq – but when I lived in Japan there was a saying amongst the ex-pats. “There are two kinds of foreign experts on Japan, those that have been here more than 30 years and those who have been here less than two weeks”. I view most foreign travel by members of congress as in the less than two weeks category.

  60. #60
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, chapoutier said:

    Gee, that’s swell of you, Chap. And what was your first clue?

    When they pissed off Dear Leader.

  61. #61
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, ADyer said:
    I’m all for transporting Pelosi on military aircraft, but these multi-seat corporate jets are overkill. I think a more amenable solution would be to rig up some kind of a harness for her to be strapped to a weapon pylon on an F-16. Or instead, maybe modify a drop tank for the purpose. It can have a little window and everything. I’d call it the Pelosi Pod(TM).

    That way Madame Speaker can get where she needs with less expense, while at the same time giving a fighter pilot much needed training hours.

    And instead of going through the trouble of landing, they could just give her a parachute, open the door and push…preferaby over the water.

  62. #62
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, T-Bone said:

    NoO parachute needed. Just have her open her mouth and the hot air in there should slow her descent.

  63. #63
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, Flyoverman said:

    Auto executives are pilloried for flying a business jet to Washington.

    Pelosi’s organization is over $10 trillion dollars in debt and she wants her own personal air force. That’s just a bunch of Bravo Sierra.

    Unless they are on Air Force One, no civilian should be on a military aircraft flying from one US city to another.

  64. #64
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, Flyoverman said:

    That way Madame Speaker can get where she needs with less expense, while at the same time giving a fighter pilot much needed training hours.

    I once had a fighter driver guarantee me he could make me upchuck in less than five minutes if i went up with him. I wonder if he could be available to fly Nancy.

  65. #65
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, Flyoverman said:
    Auto executives are pilloried for flying a business jet to Washington.

    That is the entire point in one sentence. The blatant hypocrisy is so disgusting, it deserves to be ridiculed everywhere, every day! The fact that they can’t see their own hypocrisy just shows how far detatched from reality they are!! Apparently, they really do believe they are better than even corporate executives. They’re not.

  66. #66
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, Wade said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, Flyoverman said:
    Auto executives are pilloried for flying a business jet to Washington.

    The auto execs produce something other than misery. So they must be punished with more government misery.

  67. #67
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, cabrerski said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:
    strapped to a weapon pylon on an F-16.
    “Botox2, Botox2…”

    “Uhhh…Base, we have a problem…the Pelosi Pod was released followed immediately by a misfire with my starboard Slammer…Roger, the Slammer is tracking…”

  68. #68
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, graysonret said:

    These so-called “representatives” are more and more arrogant every day. They represent their own wishes, and nothing of the public. Reminds me of the feudal days…the aristocracy and the peasants. You’ll find it hard to “vote” them out too. They buy the elections through the party and “friends”.

  69. #69
    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, cabrerski said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 3:25 pm, LOBOMAN said: I think she should get her broom upgraded and use that for these important trips she makes

    I heard the guys at GAS (“Pimp My Ride”) will be ready for the broom as soon as they finish pimpin’ Hillary’s

  70. #70
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, luckydogg said:

    LET THE B!TCH WALK!!!!!!!

  71. #71
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:17 pm, swede said:

    Washington:

    Reversing Rising of Oceans Delayed Due To Essential Carbon Emissions For Congress and POTUS

    Film at 11

  72. #72
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, fairyfoose said:

    Just ducked in….Nancy wants to be President someday. She is just in training. (Whydo you think Hillary has been exiled out of Country?) These knuckle draggers up the Peninsula just love the old girl. So simpatico. The Republican that ran against her made more progress this last election, but only slightly. Arnold doesn’t help the Party, doesn’t help down ticket races. SHMUCK!

  73. #73
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, Christopher Estep said:

    Third in line for the presidency. We may not like it, but she should get the planes. Reid? no. He’s just a senator, but Speaker Pelosi is indeed high in the presidential line of succession.

    Would conservatives have suggested that Rumsfeld and Rice take commercial flight? Of course not, and they’re further down on the succession list.

    Yes, Pelosi is in many ways one of 435 congressmen, electable every 2 years. But in reality, she’s the highest official of one of our 3 branches of government.

    Like it or not, an attack on Pelosi would be (and should be) an attack on the United States itself, just as it would be on President Obama.

  74. #74
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, graysonret said:

    Maybe she pays carbon credits for the flights…I didn’t think so, either.

  75. #75
    On March 10th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, nail49 said:

    giving a fighter pilot much needed training hours

    ADyer: This “old” fighter pilot would consider flying from point A to deliver a Congressperson to point B would be a waste of precious flying time.

    We needed to keep our skills sharp by hurling our bodies at the ground to drop a bomb where it was needed (we didn’t need no stinkin’ GPS). When we weren’t dropping bombs we were down below 100 feet shooting our guns to make sure we killed what we aimed for.

    We needed to root around at 600knots and 500 feet off the ground (max) navigating to and from the range to hurl our bodies at the ground and shoot the gun.

    Finally, we needed to twist and turn while rooting around at 600 knots and 500 feet off the ground (max) so we could defeat an aggressor and get to the range to hurl our bodies at the ground and shoot the gun.

    Now, THAT is training every fighter pilot needs!

  76. #76
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, nail49 said:

    I once had a fighter driver guarantee me he could make me upchuck in less than five minutes if i went up with him. I wonder if he could be available to fly Nancy.

    Flyoverman: I guarantee any fighter pilot worth his salt could make her sick in less than a minute from when they break ground on takeoff!

    Heck, in Vietnam I even made myself sick — with a little help from the high humidity, bad weather and getting shot at causing me to do a lot of unplanned maneuvering!!

  77. #77
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:04 pm, Misscheryl said:

    Pelosi and those like her should be held accountable for this type of flaggrant missuse. Enough of her “not returning phone calls” on the matter. Apparently she believes she is accountable to no one. She must stand before the American people and explain herself and we should not stop demanding it until we get relief. She owes us that!!! One comment regarding Christopher Estep’s post – no she should not get the planes for unofficial busines.

    House Speaker has repeatedly requested military aircraft to shuttle her, colleagues and family around the country, according to a report from conservative watchdog

    quoted from Fox News.

  78. #78
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, nail49 said:

    There seems to be a total disregard for the lives and well-being of these crews. Air Force regulations REQUIRE 12 hours of uninterrupted rest before flights are conducted, except, of course in an emergency.

    To schedule a flight and then cancel it ripples down on succeeding flight operations. Crews who are called in and then sent home have to restart their “clocks” before they can show up for the next flight. By calling them in and sending them home you are upsetting Circadian rythms and putting everyone at risk.

    Also, the unavailability of aircraft comes about because of required maintenance. You plan flying around required maintenance inspections, coordinating to minimize impact on the schedule. Unplanned flight requests made at the last minute are often not possible because of planned maintenance.

  79. #79
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, Misscheryl said:

    nail49 – but it’s all about her donchano

  80. #80
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, BlameAmericaLast said:

    For those who say Hastert had the same thing…NO, he did not. He had access to a 12 seat jet — not an entire fleet of jets that include 757s and 737s.

    Overkill a bit?

  81. #81
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, chapoutier said:

    For those who say Hastert had the same thing…NO, he did not. He had access to a 12 seat jet

    12 seats? But then where would his staff sit?

  82. #82
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:44 pm, fairyfoose said:

    The issue is NOT that she needs a plane. The issue is Nancy Fancypant’s attitude and her demand to have the biggest planes to shuttle friends and family. It’s her arrogance. A little Humility from little Nancy would go a long way to smoother ruffled feathers. Like so many in power, she has a sense of entitlement. Horse Hockey as Col. Potter said. She is entitled to a flight, not the taxpayers purse.

  83. #83
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Gorebot said:

    Prime Minister Pelosi gives virulently toxic feculant sludge a bad name.

    That such vermin (eg, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Dodd, Conyers, Rangel, Waters, et al) — and of course Bwany Fwank — can rise to such positions speaks so badly of our nation.

  84. #84
    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:59 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    BlameAmericaLast said:

    But, I still think they should be afforded the opportunity to go.

    Sure, and grudgingly he went because his PR folks said he HAD to (he had an election to win!), not because he WANTED to. There’s a difference.

    B-A-L, yes. I agree. In fact, what he did when he got there was try to undermine the Bush Administration’s foreign policy. So yes. You are correct. For many, the trip is a waste. But there were some Dems that went that came back with slightly less asinine views. Though admittedly, none come to mind at the moment.

  85. #85
    On March 10th, 2009 at 6:08 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    conservativesRus said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Rus, I think if members of congress are going to vote on issues affecting our military operations, it can be useful for them to be able to have a representative go there in person. Not the whole of congress… but some number of reps need to see the place, not just hear about it on CNN and MSNBC.

    I respectfully disagree. I understand Japan is not Iraq – but when I lived in Japan there was a saying amongst the ex-pats. “There are two kinds of foreign experts on Japan, those that have been here more than 30 years and those who have been here less than two weeks”. I view most foreign travel by members of congress as in the less than two weeks category.

    Rus, I think you’re correct that there are no doubt visits that would be a waste of time. In fact, rarely do these members of congress spend more than a day on site. And as we were saying above, anyone as predisposed to whatever thinking they had, such as Obama, is wssting everyone’s time by going. I do think there are situations and objective persons that would benefit from some face time with the people doing the work where ever it may be.

    But the issue isn’t so much that someone like Reid or Durbin are dipsh!ts who would look at a soccer game and call it Civil War, but rather that if we send our own officials into a war zone, should they be escorted in and out by the military. I just think that’s not an unreasonable measure to take.

    Perhaps it should be left to the discretion of the military as to whether it’s warranted or not, and not left to the pol.

    In Nancy’s case, they should make her parachute to her destination.

  86. #86
    On March 10th, 2009 at 6:34 pm, Paul Revere said:

    I really hate this creature.

  87. #87
    On March 10th, 2009 at 7:25 pm, MrScribbler said:

    Like it or not, an attack on Pelosi would be (and should be) an attack on the United States itself, just as it would be on President Obama.

    I so want to reply to this. It’d get me banned, though.

    So I’ll just say the people who would attack the United States are all tight buddyroos with Botox Nan.

  88. #88
    On March 10th, 2009 at 8:50 pm, rowsdower said:

    This abuse and ethics violation by Pelosi will unquestionably and immediately be addressed by the media…….by attacking Sarah Palin.

  89. #89
    On March 10th, 2009 at 9:02 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Well, it isn’t like there are non-stop commercial flights from IAD to SFO.

    Met a flight attendant on that very leg (flight) in San Franciso. First Class does have its privileges. Flew her up to Vail last weekend too… but I digress….

    I dont think I really want to get my thug thizzle on with a GOV G5 flight attendant. They might have other commitments that limits their schedule flexibility.

  90. #90
    On March 10th, 2009 at 10:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    Met a flight attendant on that very leg (flight) in San Franciso. First Class does have its privileges. Flew her up to Vail last weekend too… but I digress….

    Kiss and tell, Rabbid.

  91. #91
    On March 10th, 2009 at 11:10 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    I’d almost rather pay my neighbor’s mortgage than foot the bill for Pelosi’s travel.

    Sen. Feinstein: Please explain to NanPel how navigate home to CA via commercial flights–maybe you could hold her hand on a few trips until she’s comfortable with it.

  92. #92
    On March 10th, 2009 at 11:14 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    I wouldn’t have a problem making a web seat in the back of a C-130 available. She can sit with her knees against a pallet of cargo and make 3 or 4 stops along the way. Coast to Coast, it should only take 15 or 18 hours, depending on the stops. One thing about C-130s though, it can be difficult to keep the temperature comfortable in the back. It always pays to be nice to the Flight Engineer.

  93. #93
    On March 11th, 2009 at 12:15 am, mattymatt10 said:

    On March 10th, 2009 at 5:55 pm, Gorebot said:

    That such vermin (eg, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, Dodd, Conyers, Rangel, Waters, et al) — and of course Bwany Fwank — can rise to such positions speaks so badly of our nation.

    Not just that they can reach these positions but also stay in them for decades. “Congressman” and “Congresswoman” were never meant to be career choices.

  94. #94
    On March 11th, 2009 at 1:50 am, emjem24 said:

    I hate to inform the likes Princess Peloozi, but the military is not her personal air taxi service. She’s breaking all kinds of rules such as bringing family members with her on Congressional jaunts to far off places like Iraq. She acts like the military (and its planes) should be at her beck and call whenever she feels like using up some jet fuel. This is a serious abuse of power and needs to be investigated. Would it hurt her to use commercial air travel? She has been playing up the recession so why shouldn’t she be a role model in economy?

    If I was one of those Airmen I’d be thinking to myself when I saw Nancy and family/friends on the tarmac:

    “Man, I didn’t sign up for this. She really does look more scary in person.” :roll:

  95. #95
    On March 11th, 2009 at 2:09 am, emjem24 said:

    self-edit: likes of Princess Peloozi…

  96. #96
    On March 11th, 2009 at 11:32 am, Mainah said:
  97. #97
    On March 11th, 2009 at 11:52 am, battleaxe said:

    We can blog furiously until the cows come home, but until we’re ready to march on DC with our torches, pitchforks, tar, and feathers, she (and the rest of the elitist Congressional scum) will continue to live it up on our tax dollars while nickel and dime-ing us to death. We do nothing except prove Schumer’s “chattering class” point by actionless blogging.

  98. #98
    On March 11th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, Marie said:

    To heck with all of this. Where is the puppy HE promised to his kids?

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs

February 9, 2012 10:08 PM by Doug Powers

50 Comments

Stealth altruism

Former Democrat Rep. Regrets Vote for Obamacare Due to Contraceptive Coverage

February 7, 2012 03:40 PM by Doug Powers

75 Comments

She wasn’t kidding

Biden Prediction: Dems Will Retake House

January 27, 2012 07:31 PM by Doug Powers

106 Comments

Joestradamus

Pelosi Doubles Down: Gingrich Won’t Be Elected — There is Something I Know

January 24, 2012 11:06 PM by Doug Powers

119 Comments

Inside information?

Pelosi’s Office Denies Daughter’s Retirement Claim

December 29, 2011 10:56 PM by Doug Powers

54 Comments

Familial clarifications

Pelosi Spends the Holidays Sacrificing on Behalf of Her Beloved 99%

December 26, 2011 01:02 PM by Doug Powers

89 Comments

#OccupyHualalaiResort

Nancy Pelosi, Down and Dirty

December 16, 2011 01:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments

Pelosi and Pickens sittin’ in a tree…

December 14, 2011 05:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

64 Comments


Categories: Nancy Pelosi

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook