<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: L.A. Times: We don&#8217;t cover citizen rallies&#8230;unless we agree with them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:18:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; L.A. Times: We Didn&#8217;t Cover the John and Ken Rally Because Those Guys Are Idiots Rallies of 15,000 People Aren&#8217;t Newsworthy. Oh REALLY?!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-750574</link>
		<dc:creator>Patterico&#8217;s Pontifications &#187; L.A. Times: We Didn&#8217;t Cover the John and Ken Rally Because Those Guys Are Idiots Rallies of 15,000 People Aren&#8217;t Newsworthy. Oh REALLY?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 07:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-750574</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Michelle Malkin for the link. Also, I should have mentioned in the post that that there were a couple of dismissive lines on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Michelle Malkin for the link. Also, I should have mentioned in the post that that there were a couple of dismissive lines on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Live from the Cali tax revolt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-701899</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Live from the Cali tax revolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 01:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-701899</guid>
		<description>[...] You won&#8217;t see it in the L.A. Times. They only cover rallies they agree with, remember? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You won&#8217;t see it in the L.A. Times. They only cover rallies they agree with, remember? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thetoysurgeon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-650565</link>
		<dc:creator>thetoysurgeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-650565</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from state run media....the truth?  Whats funny about this socialist take-over is that we know all the moves and we have seen it before. That should make it just that more simpler to take down...Lets see.. take over the media...the banks...our neighbors...our children...then us....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from state run media&#8230;.the truth?  Whats funny about this socialist take-over is that we know all the moves and we have seen it before. That should make it just that more simpler to take down&#8230;Lets see.. take over the media&#8230;the banks&#8230;our neighbors&#8230;our children&#8230;then us&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silverbids.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; L.A. Times: We Didn’t Cover the John and Ken Rally Because Those Guys Are Idiots Rallies of 15,000 People Aren’t Newsworthy. Oh REALLY?!</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-650418</link>
		<dc:creator>Silverbids.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; L.A. Times: We Didn’t Cover the John and Ken Rally Because Those Guys Are Idiots Rallies of 15,000 People Aren’t Newsworthy. Oh REALLY?!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-650418</guid>
		<description>[...] Thanks to Michelle Malkin for the link. Also, I should have mentioned in the post that that there were a couple of dismissive lines on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thanks to Michelle Malkin for the link. Also, I should have mentioned in the post that that there were a couple of dismissive lines on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cft999</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-647004</link>
		<dc:creator>cft999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-647004</guid>
		<description>Saturdays are notoriously slow in the  news biz, so even a modest rally/event like this would dictate editors send a reporter and photographer out to cover it ...

Unless they didn&#039;t want this to be covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturdays are notoriously slow in the  news biz, so even a modest rally/event like this would dictate editors send a reporter and photographer out to cover it &#8230;</p>
<p>Unless they didn&#8217;t want this to be covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetFireman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646374</link>
		<dc:creator>RetFireman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646374</guid>
		<description>The big quetion is, will they cover the rallies of people that begin to demand that Der Fuhrer and the entire Democrat Party step down and allow a new election to take place?

I can&#039;t help but think if things continue the way they have been, that such demonstrations are not all that far away.

And as for their guesstimates as to the size of rallies, remember, the &quot;Million Man March&quot; was stated to be over a million people, yet actual numbers were hundreds of thousands less, all the &quot;peace rallies&quot; supposedly always had hundreds of thousands of people in attendance yet looking at the pictures they actually had much, much less...

And then there are the Islamic Happy-Time Fun, Fun rallies which they claim have thousands in attendance...but actually have a few dozen helped by clever photography...

but the greatest example of how Liberal news outlets like to pump up the numbers of people who attend rallies for causes the outlets agree with would have to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cindysheehanwatch.com/sheehancluster.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one of Cindy Sheehan.&lt;/a&gt; Remember when the original picture was shown?  It was shown as a way to show how many people were in attendance, how all these anti-war, anti-Bush moonbats were all there, supporting Cindy&#039;s cause etc., etc., etc., and even came complete with a very dour looking Jesse Jackson, but when you saw the actual picture, from a camera that took a picture some ways back, you saw that all these supposed well-wishers and supporters were nothing more than photographers, reporters and other assorted gutter-trash.

Yeah...they just love being non-biased and reporting only the truth, don&#039;t they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big quetion is, will they cover the rallies of people that begin to demand that Der Fuhrer and the entire Democrat Party step down and allow a new election to take place?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but think if things continue the way they have been, that such demonstrations are not all that far away.</p>
<p>And as for their guesstimates as to the size of rallies, remember, the &#8220;Million Man March&#8221; was stated to be over a million people, yet actual numbers were hundreds of thousands less, all the &#8220;peace rallies&#8221; supposedly always had hundreds of thousands of people in attendance yet looking at the pictures they actually had much, much less&#8230;</p>
<p>And then there are the Islamic Happy-Time Fun, Fun rallies which they claim have thousands in attendance&#8230;but actually have a few dozen helped by clever photography&#8230;</p>
<p>but the greatest example of how Liberal news outlets like to pump up the numbers of people who attend rallies for causes the outlets agree with would have to be <a href="http://www.cindysheehanwatch.com/sheehancluster.html" rel="nofollow">this one of Cindy Sheehan.</a> Remember when the original picture was shown?  It was shown as a way to show how many people were in attendance, how all these anti-war, anti-Bush moonbats were all there, supporting Cindy&#8217;s cause etc., etc., etc., and even came complete with a very dour looking Jesse Jackson, but when you saw the actual picture, from a camera that took a picture some ways back, you saw that all these supposed well-wishers and supporters were nothing more than photographers, reporters and other assorted gutter-trash.</p>
<p>Yeah&#8230;they just love being non-biased and reporting only the truth, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogerCfromSD</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646362</link>
		<dc:creator>RogerCfromSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646362</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm.... I wonder if they&#039;ll cover a protest of thousands of Conservatives who &quot;spontaneously&quot; take to the streets without a permit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230;. I wonder if they&#8217;ll cover a protest of thousands of Conservatives who &#8220;spontaneously&#8221; take to the streets without a permit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Toast to the Dying Newspapers &#124; WTF?! Obama</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646303</link>
		<dc:creator>A Toast to the Dying Newspapers &#124; WTF?! Obama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646303</guid>
		<description>[...] the latest IOTW candidate is none other than the L.A. Times.  Seems they can&#8217;t cover the Chicago Tea Parties because they don&#8217;t qualify for coverage, no matter how many people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the latest IOTW candidate is none other than the L.A. Times.  Seems they can&#8217;t cover the Chicago Tea Parties because they don&#8217;t qualify for coverage, no matter how many people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Toast to the Dying Newspapers &#171; So Many Idiots, So Little Time</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646297</link>
		<dc:creator>A Toast to the Dying Newspapers &#171; So Many Idiots, So Little Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646297</guid>
		<description>[...] the latest IOTW candidate is none other than the L.A. Times.  Seems they can&#8217;t cover the Chicago Tea Parties because they don&#8217;t qualify for coverage, no matter how many people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the latest IOTW candidate is none other than the L.A. Times.  Seems they can&#8217;t cover the Chicago Tea Parties because they don&#8217;t qualify for coverage, no matter how many people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightisright</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646284</link>
		<dc:creator>rightisright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646284</guid>
		<description>The La&lt;strike&gt; Los&lt;/strike&gt;Raza &lt;strike&gt;Angeles&lt;/strike&gt; Times ignored the thousands of people who gathered in Fullerton CA on Saturday for a massive tax revolt that was just one of several demonstrations over the weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The La<strike> Los</strike>Raza <strike>Angeles</strike> Times ignored the thousands of people who gathered in Fullerton CA on Saturday for a massive tax revolt that was just one of several demonstrations over the weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WestCoastCoconut</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646255</link>
		<dc:creator>WestCoastCoconut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646255</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; alwaysright43 said:

Thank God for people like Michelle, Glenn Beck, Rush, etal because I think we would all look like zombies from a George Romero film by now.

Such as the case below.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWpU8sX10_4&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The best movie line.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> alwaysright43 said:</p>
<p>Thank God for people like Michelle, Glenn Beck, Rush, etal because I think we would all look like zombies from a George Romero film by now.</p>
<p>Such as the case below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWpU8sX10_4" rel="nofollow">The best movie line.</a></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lwssdd</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646217</link>
		<dc:creator>lwssdd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646217</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;DPM&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;(Democrat Propaganda Machine)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>DPM</strong> <em><strong>(Democrat Propaganda Machine)</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO2 Producer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646177</link>
		<dc:creator>CO2 Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646177</guid>
		<description>On March 11th, 2009 at 12:17 pm, tonyr951 said:
&lt;blockquote&gt;If it were 20 LAUSD teachers having a fit they would cover it&lt;/blockquote&gt;Glad you said it, or else I would&#039;ve had to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 11th, 2009 at 12:17 pm, tonyr951 said:</p>
<blockquote><p>If it were 20 LAUSD teachers having a fit they would cover it</p></blockquote>
<p>Glad you said it, or else I would&#8217;ve had to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646167</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All the major liberal rags in this country are on life support. The NY Times, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Detroit Free-Press, San Francisco Chronicle, the Philadelphia Inquirer….on and on. They are hemorrhaging money.

Their days are numbered, and we will ALL have the last laugh.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And of course the written media would be the NEXT bunch to seek (and GET) a bailout using taxpayer money. You think for one minute Zero would want to see the only reason (okay - other than DEAD people) he was elected disappear?

Racial profiling ... another victimization boondoggle! I was a NYC cop for 25 years. I once stopped a guy for making an illegal turn througha red light - nearly causing a 4 or 5 car collision. I chased him through another 3 red lights before stopping him. I arrested him and in court his attorney said I only stopped him because he was &quot;DWB&quot; (Driving While Black). Too bad I had pictures of his car, with dark tinted windows that prevented anyone from seeing into the car at all. After the judge saw that ... GUILTY - 30 days, $500 fine, license revoked for 6 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All the major liberal rags in this country are on life support. The NY Times, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Detroit Free-Press, San Francisco Chronicle, the Philadelphia Inquirer….on and on. They are hemorrhaging money.</p>
<p>Their days are numbered, and we will ALL have the last laugh.</p></blockquote>
<p>And of course the written media would be the NEXT bunch to seek (and GET) a bailout using taxpayer money. You think for one minute Zero would want to see the only reason (okay &#8211; other than DEAD people) he was elected disappear?</p>
<p>Racial profiling &#8230; another victimization boondoggle! I was a NYC cop for 25 years. I once stopped a guy for making an illegal turn througha red light &#8211; nearly causing a 4 or 5 car collision. I chased him through another 3 red lights before stopping him. I arrested him and in court his attorney said I only stopped him because he was &#8220;DWB&#8221; (Driving While Black). Too bad I had pictures of his car, with dark tinted windows that prevented anyone from seeing into the car at all. After the judge saw that &#8230; GUILTY &#8211; 30 days, $500 fine, license revoked for 6 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeOK</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/11/la-times-we-dont-cover-citizen-ralliesunless-we-agree-with-them/comment-page-1/#comment-646141</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24522#comment-646141</guid>
		<description>I think &quot;John and Ken&quot; should have a little fun with the LA Times -- start promoting liberal protests (unions, illegal aliens, etc.) on their show, and then show up and do live on-air remotes from those liberal protests.  Obviously, by their own standards, the LA Times can&#039;t cover those events, because &quot;John and Ken&quot; used them to promote their radio show.  If the LA Times &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; cover those events, have &quot;John and Ken&quot; bust them on the air.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think &#8220;John and Ken&#8221; should have a little fun with the LA Times &#8212; start promoting liberal protests (unions, illegal aliens, etc.) on their show, and then show up and do live on-air remotes from those liberal protests.  Obviously, by their own standards, the LA Times can&#8217;t cover those events, because &#8220;John and Ken&#8221; used them to promote their radio show.  If the LA Times <em>does</em> cover those events, have &#8220;John and Ken&#8221; bust them on the air.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

