<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to be a New York Times conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:16:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to be a New York Times conservative &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-656958</link>
		<dc:creator>How to be a New York Times conservative &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-656958</guid>
		<description>[...] Proceed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Proceed here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelby Steele on Conservatism, Minorities and the GOP &#124; The Great Illuminator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-649776</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelby Steele on Conservatism, Minorities and the GOP &#124; The Great Illuminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-649776</guid>
		<description>[...] Wall Street Journal by Shelby Steele about historical and societal obstacles Republicans have to contend with in order to entice minorities to vote for the party. Steele is a self-described black conservative, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wall Street Journal by Shelby Steele about historical and societal obstacles Republicans have to contend with in order to entice minorities to vote for the party. Steele is a self-described black conservative, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647922</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647922</guid>
		<description>To be an acceptable NY Times columnist, here are the most important terms and conditions:
1) First and foremost, you must be &quot;ashamed of Israel&quot; as Roger Cohen bragged last week.
2) You must be in favor of a full Israeli withdrawal back to the 1948 armistice lines and blame the failure of peace solely on Israel&#039;s alleged misconduct (Kristof, Cohen and Dowd make this charge about three times a month)
3) You must be sycophantic when discussing Islam (Cohen said how happy he was when Obama mentioned Islam before Judaism in the inauguration speech) and preferably you should have &quot;studied&quot; in the Arab world where you gained a full uderstanding of &quot;Muslim grievances&quot;). Kristof recently bragged that he learned Arabic while studying in Cairo and he therefore has an affinity for the Islamic world.
4) You must have a hatred of G.W. Bush based primarily on W&#039;s support for Israel and you must treat Israel as a naughty child who need Ivy League supervision. 
5) You must be utterly predictable and write the same column week in and week out. Cohen recently rewrote the same hit piece on Israel that he wrote a month earlier for the NY Review of Books.
7) You must be a terrible snob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be an acceptable NY Times columnist, here are the most important terms and conditions:<br />
1) First and foremost, you must be &#8220;ashamed of Israel&#8221; as Roger Cohen bragged last week.<br />
2) You must be in favor of a full Israeli withdrawal back to the 1948 armistice lines and blame the failure of peace solely on Israel&#8217;s alleged misconduct (Kristof, Cohen and Dowd make this charge about three times a month)<br />
3) You must be sycophantic when discussing Islam (Cohen said how happy he was when Obama mentioned Islam before Judaism in the inauguration speech) and preferably you should have &#8220;studied&#8221; in the Arab world where you gained a full uderstanding of &#8220;Muslim grievances&#8221;). Kristof recently bragged that he learned Arabic while studying in Cairo and he therefore has an affinity for the Islamic world.<br />
4) You must have a hatred of G.W. Bush based primarily on W&#8217;s support for Israel and you must treat Israel as a naughty child who need Ivy League supervision.<br />
5) You must be utterly predictable and write the same column week in and week out. Cohen recently rewrote the same hit piece on Israel that he wrote a month earlier for the NY Review of Books.<br />
7) You must be a terrible snob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EWTHeckman</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647777</link>
		<dc:creator>EWTHeckman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647777</guid>
		<description>Papa Louie wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Ross may be a Republican [RINO], but conservative he is not! Does the NYT really not know the difference?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Based on what I&#039;ve seen of the Times, he&#039;s so far to the right of them that consider him to be a right-wing fanatic. So no, they don&#039;t know the difference. And if there actually is anyone there that knows the difference, they probably view this guy as their &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman_fallacy&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;strawman&lt;/a&gt; conservative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papa Louie wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ross may be a Republican [RINO], but conservative he is not! Does the NYT really not know the difference?</p></blockquote>
<p>Based on what I&#8217;ve seen of the Times, he&#8217;s so far to the right of them that consider him to be a right-wing fanatic. So no, they don&#8217;t know the difference. And if there actually is anyone there that knows the difference, they probably view this guy as their <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawman_fallacy" rel="nofollow">strawman</a> conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The News Factor: News, opinion, current events &#8212; a rewarding news experience &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647551</link>
		<dc:creator>The News Factor: News, opinion, current events &#8212; a rewarding news experience &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647551</guid>
		<description>[...] Study finds many couldn’t care less if newspapers closed ► How to be a New York Times conservative ► ‘Paper is dying, but it’s just a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Study finds many couldn’t care less if newspapers closed ► How to be a New York Times conservative ► ‘Paper is dying, but it’s just a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647259</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647259</guid>
		<description>In other words, they are looking for a conventional RINO like Michael Steele.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, they are looking for a conventional RINO like Michael Steele.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CO2 Producer</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647127</link>
		<dc:creator>CO2 Producer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647127</guid>
		<description>Back OT (that stands for &quot;on topic,&quot; but I was too lazy to write that phrase)---hiring Douthat will bring in much new readership, I am absolutely sure. I&#039;m willing to bet Sulzberger&#039;s paper on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back OT (that stands for &#8220;on topic,&#8221; but I was too lazy to write that phrase)&#8212;hiring Douthat will bring in much new readership, I am absolutely sure. I&#8217;m willing to bet Sulzberger&#8217;s paper on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647091</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper:&lt;/strong&gt;

Same here, not even smoking or drinking for me (well OK, the occasional drink). Thankfully big brother doesn&#039;t restrict my freedoms at gun point when it comes to the drugs of their choosing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper:</strong></p>
<p>Same here, not even smoking or drinking for me (well OK, the occasional drink). Thankfully big brother doesn&#8217;t restrict my freedoms at gun point when it comes to the drugs of their choosing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647073</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647073</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We can totally hi-jack this thread if you like. *grin*&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ha!  Thanks, but no thanks!  My pot-smoking days are far far behind me!  Like in the 60&#039;s, man. Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We can totally hi-jack this thread if you like. *grin*</p></blockquote>
<p>Ha!  Thanks, but no thanks!  My pot-smoking days are far far behind me!  Like in the 60&#8217;s, man. Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647034</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647034</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper:&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;But I still find the issue of legalizing drugs boring.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Perhaps you never got ahold of really good drugs? In any case, it can&#039;t be that boring since you brought it up again.

We can totally hi-jack this thread if you like. *grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>But I still find the issue of legalizing drugs boring.</p></blockquote>
<p>Perhaps you never got ahold of really good drugs? In any case, it can&#8217;t be that boring since you brought it up again.</p>
<p>We can totally hi-jack this thread if you like. *grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647029</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647029</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 12th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, zeroangel said: 
happyscrapper:

Or, presumably, like you yourself admit doing? (second quote in #52)&lt;/blockquote&gt;Well, there ya go!  We&#039;re not so different, you and I!  But I still find the issue of legalizing drugs boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 12th, 2009 at 2:03 pm, zeroangel said:<br />
happyscrapper:</p>
<p>Or, presumably, like you yourself admit doing? (second quote in #52)</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, there ya go!  We&#8217;re not so different, you and I!  But I still find the issue of legalizing drugs boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Papa Louie</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-647019</link>
		<dc:creator>Papa Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-647019</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;His writing steers away from partisanship — he frequently criticizes Republicans — or doctrine, showing a concern for income inequality that is usually the terrain of more liberal writers. On abortion, he said in an interview, “I’m sort of a squishy pro-lifer,” interested in finding areas of compromise. He initially favored the war in Iraq, but later opposed it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Ross may be a Republican [RINO], but conservative he is not! Does the NYT really not know the difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>His writing steers away from partisanship — he frequently criticizes Republicans — or doctrine, showing a concern for income inequality that is usually the terrain of more liberal writers. On abortion, he said in an interview, “I’m sort of a squishy pro-lifer,” interested in finding areas of compromise. He initially favored the war in Iraq, but later opposed it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ross may be a Republican [RINO], but conservative he is not! Does the NYT really not know the difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-646977</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-646977</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper:&lt;/strong&gt;

Or, presumably, like you yourself admit doing? (second quote in #&lt;strong&gt;52&lt;/strong&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper:</strong></p>
<p>Or, presumably, like you yourself admit doing? (second quote in #<strong>52</strong>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-646963</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-646963</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Full of myself, moi? You mean how I say what I think and don’t always pull punches?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, like Rush Limbaugh...so I guess you can&#039;t be all bad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Full of myself, moi? You mean how I say what I think and don’t always pull punches?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, like Rush Limbaugh&#8230;so I guess you can&#8217;t be all bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zeroangel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/12/how-to-be-a-new-york-times-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-646954</link>
		<dc:creator>zeroangel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24551#comment-646954</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;happyscrapper:&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;even those (like yourself) who are, at times, “full of themselves”. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Full of myself, moi? You mean how I say what I think and don&#039;t always pull punches?

&lt;blockquote&gt;I do, however, say what I think…I think by now they know I am not very PC…and can sometimes be less than tactful, &lt;/blockquote&gt;Say it ain&#039;t so, &lt;strong&gt;happy&lt;/strong&gt;! Say it ain&#039;t so! *wink*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>happyscrapper:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>even those (like yourself) who are, at times, “full of themselves”. </p></blockquote>
<p>Full of myself, moi? You mean how I say what I think and don&#8217;t always pull punches?</p>
<blockquote><p>I do, however, say what I think…I think by now they know I am not very PC…and can sometimes be less than tactful, </p></blockquote>
<p>Say it ain&#8217;t so, <strong>happy</strong>! Say it ain&#8217;t so! *wink*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
