<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lesson of the Cramer/Stewart kerfuffle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:49:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-832437</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-832437</guid>
		<description>My hopes are dashed.  lgm has not been banned. :cry:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My hopes are dashed.  lgm has not been banned. <img src='http://michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cry.gif' alt=':cry:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-my-soap-box</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-832433</link>
		<dc:creator>On-my-soap-box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-832433</guid>
		<description>Sorry corkie but just because you believe the recession is over does not make it so.  The best you can say is, it was over for a quarter.  What will you say if the 4thQ GDP is down?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAT7X7HSyY0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I will believe Cramer.&lt;/a&gt;

Crist stinks like DC so he will prolly win.  He will NOT get my vote or support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry corkie but just because you believe the recession is over does not make it so.  The best you can say is, it was over for a quarter.  What will you say if the 4thQ GDP is down?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAT7X7HSyY0" rel="nofollow">I will believe Cramer.</a></p>
<p>Crist stinks like DC so he will prolly win.  He will NOT get my vote or support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huggybear</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-650174</link>
		<dc:creator>huggybear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-650174</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since he’s so concerned and indignant about financial fraud and shoddy journalism, perhaps the brave Speaker of Truth to Power will set his sights next on crony of color Maxine Waters or the ACORN crime racket.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This from one of the most unapologetically partisan bloggers around. You used to work for O&#039;Reilly, for crying out loud.  You know as well as anybody else, he doesn&#039;t have to be fair, he doesn&#039;t have to be objective.  It&#039;s his show -- He can report on whatever he chooses because it&#039;s his show and his priorities.  At least he does not pretend to be &quot;fair and balanced&quot;, unlike certain other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;clowns&lt;/a&gt; with entertainment shows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/hannity/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;masquerading&lt;/a&gt; as journalism.  As far as I can see, the only difference between the Fox News primetime lineup and The Daily Show is that Stewart&#039;s comedy is intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since he’s so concerned and indignant about financial fraud and shoddy journalism, perhaps the brave Speaker of Truth to Power will set his sights next on crony of color Maxine Waters or the ACORN crime racket.</p></blockquote>
<p>This from one of the most unapologetically partisan bloggers around. You used to work for O&#8217;Reilly, for crying out loud.  You know as well as anybody else, he doesn&#8217;t have to be fair, he doesn&#8217;t have to be objective.  It&#8217;s his show &#8212; He can report on whatever he chooses because it&#8217;s his show and his priorities.  At least he does not pretend to be &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221;, unlike certain other <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/oreilly/" rel="nofollow">clowns</a> with entertainment shows <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/hannity/index.html" rel="nofollow">masquerading</a> as journalism.  As far as I can see, the only difference between the Fox News primetime lineup and The Daily Show is that Stewart&#8217;s comedy is intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyzzyg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-649623</link>
		<dc:creator>zyzzyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-649623</guid>
		<description>The message that is missed in taking the messenger to task -

The notion was that the networks, being aware of a gap between image and reality that they had steadfastly refused to address in their coverage, had abdicated their journalistic responsibilities faster than you can say &quot;Judith Miller.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The message that is missed in taking the messenger to task -</p>
<p>The notion was that the networks, being aware of a gap between image and reality that they had steadfastly refused to address in their coverage, had abdicated their journalistic responsibilities faster than you can say &#8220;Judith Miller.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-649092</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-649092</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 15th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, lgm said: 
Cramer is a fraud preying on un-informed suckers - - - sort of like the Republican party.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There&#039;s always hope for the uninformed, it&#039;s the misinformed Democrat Party kool-aid drinkers for which there is no hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2009 at 2:26 pm, lgm said:<br />
Cramer is a fraud preying on un-informed suckers &#8211; - &#8211; sort of like the Republican party.</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s always hope for the uninformed, it&#8217;s the misinformed Democrat Party kool-aid drinkers for which there is no hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-649087</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-649087</guid>
		<description>Cramer is a fraud preying on un-informed suckers - - - sort of like the Republican party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer is a fraud preying on un-informed suckers &#8211; - &#8211; sort of like the Republican party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rambler</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-649011</link>
		<dc:creator>rambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-649011</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re going to get alot more of the &quot;shoot the messenger&quot; stuff especially if the message is resonating with the public.  Certainly, start the take down the most powerful messenger, it&#039;s the Chicago way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re going to get alot more of the &#8220;shoot the messenger&#8221; stuff especially if the message is resonating with the public.  Certainly, start the take down the most powerful messenger, it&#8217;s the Chicago way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648954</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 15th, 2009 at 2:30 am, RabbidSquirrel said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 14th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

Please don’t kick me out for going off topic!&lt;/blockquote&gt;Why have so many people been freaked out the last few months (since the election) for going off-topic (thread-jacking is a whole other discussion). Its like I missed the high school assembly where MM gave us the ‘you’re not gonna graduate if…” lecture. And I think I missed this years hall monitor elections too.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Actually, I was kinda being silly.  I don&#039;t really think Michelle would do that!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2009 at 2:30 am, RabbidSquirrel said: </p>
<blockquote><p>On March 14th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, happyscrapper said:</p>
<p>Please don’t kick me out for going off topic!</p></blockquote>
<p>Why have so many people been freaked out the last few months (since the election) for going off-topic (thread-jacking is a whole other discussion). Its like I missed the high school assembly where MM gave us the ‘you’re not gonna graduate if…” lecture. And I think I missed this years hall monitor elections too.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, I was kinda being silly.  I don&#8217;t really think Michelle would do that!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648878</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648878</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 15th, 2009 at 7:55 am, RogersUmp said: 
It seems that people who are critisizing Rush, Hannity and Coulter, are doing so because of their delivery style and not the content of what they are saying. I never hear complaints about specifics. &lt;strong&gt;Is it beacuse they would sound stupid critisizing the common sense and loical thinking that Rush, Hannity and Coulter ’spew’&lt;/strong&gt;?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think a lot of people believe what&#039;s said about them without ever actually listening to what they are saying. The same is true of the lefts hate for MM. If you&#039;re speaking out against their ideolgy, and you&#039;re effective, you are on their list to destroy. With the power of the MSM to help in the destruction, it&#039;s not surprizing how many people have opinions shaped by what they are told about those on the right, not anything they have actually listened to themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2009 at 7:55 am, RogersUmp said:<br />
It seems that people who are critisizing Rush, Hannity and Coulter, are doing so because of their delivery style and not the content of what they are saying. I never hear complaints about specifics. <strong>Is it beacuse they would sound stupid critisizing the common sense and loical thinking that Rush, Hannity and Coulter ’spew’</strong>?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think a lot of people believe what&#8217;s said about them without ever actually listening to what they are saying. The same is true of the lefts hate for MM. If you&#8217;re speaking out against their ideolgy, and you&#8217;re effective, you are on their list to destroy. With the power of the MSM to help in the destruction, it&#8217;s not surprizing how many people have opinions shaped by what they are told about those on the right, not anything they have actually listened to themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOB</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648843</link>
		<dc:creator>BOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648843</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 15th, 2009 at 12:18 am, MrScribbler said: 

Like him or not, Rush is a brilliant man IMO.

True, but he is, first and foremost, an entertainer. His act is so well-honed that even if he didn’t believe in 10% of what he says he could still sell it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re right, he is very. very good at what he does. Too bad the same cannot be said of our &quot;leadership&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2009 at 12:18 am, MrScribbler said: </p>
<p>Like him or not, Rush is a brilliant man IMO.</p>
<p>True, but he is, first and foremost, an entertainer. His act is so well-honed that even if he didn’t believe in 10% of what he says he could still sell it.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re right, he is very. very good at what he does. Too bad the same cannot be said of our &#8220;leadership&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RogersUmp</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648841</link>
		<dc:creator>RogersUmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648841</guid>
		<description>It seems that people who are critisizing Rush, Hannity and Coulter,  are doing so because of their delivery style and not the content of what they are saying.  I never hear complaints about specifics.  Is it beacuse they would sound stupid critisizing the common sense and loical thinking that Rush, Hannity and Coulter &#039;spew&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that people who are critisizing Rush, Hannity and Coulter,  are doing so because of their delivery style and not the content of what they are saying.  I never hear complaints about specifics.  Is it beacuse they would sound stupid critisizing the common sense and loical thinking that Rush, Hannity and Coulter &#8217;spew&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648806</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648806</guid>
		<description>OT - for those who think Obama is a Muslim, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/us/politics/15pastor.html?_r=1&amp;hp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;food for thought&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT &#8211; for those who think Obama is a Muslim, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/us/politics/15pastor.html?_r=1&amp;hp" rel="nofollow">food for thought</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabbidSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648792</link>
		<dc:creator>RabbidSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648792</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On March 14th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, happyscrapper said:

Please don’t kick me out for going off topic!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Why have so many people been freaked out the last few months (since the election) for going off-topic (thread-jacking is a whole other discussion). Its like I missed the high school assembly where MM gave us the &#039;you&#039;re not gonna graduate if...&quot; lecture. And I think I missed this years hall monitor elections too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On March 14th, 2009 at 8:42 pm, happyscrapper said:</p>
<p>Please don’t kick me out for going off topic!</p></blockquote>
<p>Why have so many people been freaked out the last few months (since the election) for going off-topic (thread-jacking is a whole other discussion). Its like I missed the high school assembly where MM gave us the &#8216;you&#8217;re not gonna graduate if&#8230;&#8221; lecture. And I think I missed this years hall monitor elections too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabbidSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648791</link>
		<dc:creator>RabbidSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 06:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648791</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Oh yeah, Jim Cramer was real responsible all right. Responsible for misinformation. Responsible for those idiots who took his advice to lose all their money. He is a fool. And so is Jon Stewart.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If anyone lost money because of Jim Cramer then its their own fault. When you get free advice on TV, what do you expect? Its free. Its up to the individual investor to valiate Cramers advice and dig into each company&#039;s financials and executive leadership.

If you just throw money at a company because you got a &#039;hop tip&#039; you probably have better odds hitting the slots in Vegas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Oh yeah, Jim Cramer was real responsible all right. Responsible for misinformation. Responsible for those idiots who took his advice to lose all their money. He is a fool. And so is Jon Stewart.</p></blockquote>
<p>If anyone lost money because of Jim Cramer then its their own fault. When you get free advice on TV, what do you expect? Its free. Its up to the individual investor to valiate Cramers advice and dig into each company&#8217;s financials and executive leadership.</p>
<p>If you just throw money at a company because you got a &#8216;hop tip&#8217; you probably have better odds hitting the slots in Vegas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frontierguy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/14/lesson-of-the-cramerstewart-kerfuffle/comment-page-2/#comment-648786</link>
		<dc:creator>frontierguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 05:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24642#comment-648786</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;whatever is going on, go Abe Simpson and ask that 3 states be abolished (fans will undestand), or whatever.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

LOL....I&#039;ll be deep in my grave before I ever accept Missourah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>whatever is going on, go Abe Simpson and ask that 3 states be abolished (fans will undestand), or whatever.</p></blockquote>
<p>LOL&#8230;.I&#8217;ll be deep in my grave before I ever accept Missourah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
