The trouble with Meghan McCain

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 15, 2009 06:03 AM

You know what’s wrong with Meghan McCain? It’s not her weight. It’s not her voice. It’s not her looks. She’s a beautiful young girl with TV-friendly poise and natural charm. The trouble with Meghan McCain is that, like her father, she has no fixed ideological principles — conservative, liberal, or otherwise. She seems to have inherited the notion that playing the “maaaaverick” imparts her with moral authority and credibility as a fresh voice for the GOP. I’m all for speaking truth to power. But like her father, Ms. McCain’s maaaaverick-iness appears to be rooted less in any firm set of beliefs than in the need for liberal approbation.

Take her “beef with Ann Coulter.” (Ms. McCain’s not the first or only one on the Right to ever criticize her, by the way.) If Ms. McCain sincerely detests Coulter’s “demeanor” and “extreme” thinking, statements, and behavior because they represent “hate” and alienate young voters, then how is it that the same genteel Ms. McCain can cheer the cretinous, left-wing extremist Russell Brand?

Here’s what she wrote on her Twitter page Friday evening:

Russell Brand is freaking hilarious, just started listening to his podcasts on itunes. Everyone should check it out. 6:05 PM Mar 13th from web

She followed up by linking to his website:

http://www.russellbrand.tv/ to everyone that asked, here is russell brand’s website

Ms. McCain, have you forgotten what Russell Brand said about your dad’s running mate and her family? Have you forgotten what he said about President Bush? Here, let me remind you…from my blog post on September 7, 2008:

Reader M.G. writes that the MTV Awards show was the latest venue for vicious Palin family-bashing:

“I know a few people at Viacom and I tuned in to see the MTV music awards tonight. I was disgusted and appalled when the British host Russell Brand started begging America to vote for Barack Obama. Like his opinion matters. He’s not even a citizen. What’s worse is that he attacked Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter. He made a snide joke that her baby was not a boy or a girl, but a P.R. stunt.”

You can watch Brand’s opening screed here. This cretin’s claim to fame? Dressing up as Osama bin Laden on the day after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

I’ve transcribed some of his Obama endorsement and GOP-bashing, which occurred barely 3-4 minutes into the show:

BRAND: “Now, as a representative of the global community and a visitor from abroad, I don’t want to come across a little bit biased, but could I please ask of you people of America, to PLEASE ELECT BARACK OBAMA. Please! On behalf of the world. (Camera pans to singers Chris Brown and Britney Spears applauding and cheering.) Some people, I think they’re called racists, say that America is not ready for a black president. But I know America to be a forward-thinking country, right. Because, otherwise, you know, would you have let that retarded cowboy fellow be president for eight years?

We were very impressed. It was nice of you to let him have a go. Because in England, George Bush wouldn’t be trusted with a pair of scissors.

I am obliged by broadcasting law to show some balance in this situation, which means, uh, the Republicans might be alright. Sarah Palin. She’s a VILF! A vice president I’d like to…fumble, fondle, I dunno. I do feel a little bit sorry for her daughter, getting pregnant, poor kid. Is it a boy? Is it a girl? It’s a P.R. stunt. Come on. Be honest.

And I feel most sorry for that poor teenaged father. Boy. One minute, he’s just a teenaged lad in Alaska having joyful, unprotected sex. And the next minute: Get to the Republican convention. I think that is the best safe sex message of all time. Use a condom or become Republican! …That boy will spend the rest of his life masturbating while wearing a condom…

…New music, new president, and brand new America. And you people deserve it after eight years of Bush. I promise you, you deserve it…

Does the GOP need a new generation of conservatives who can defend our core values against the constant campus/media/Hollywood/effete European onslaught? Hell, yes.

Does the GOP need rudderless, self-defeating representatives who embrace pop culture demagogues on the Left while castigating the incivility of the “extreme Right?” Hell, no.

In her blog post on Coulter last week, Ms. McCain wondered: “Is she for real or not? Are some of her statements just gimmicks to gain publicity…or does she actually believe the things she says? Et tu, Meghan?

More reminders: Ms. McCain’s favorite comedian went on last fall to trash the Jonas Brothers for vowing to abstain from premarital sex before marriage. He had planned even more disgusting, vicious jokes — some aimed at Ms. McCain’s father and another involving an electric chair gag targeting the Palins:

The British comedian appeared to annoy celebrities and some fans when he made a series of risque political and sexual jokes hosting the 25th anniversary show. But Brand, who called for Americans to vote for Democratic nominee Barack Obama in the presidential elections, claimed censors at the channel had already toned down his routine and vetoed several jokes.

He said: “I had John McCain gags pulled. And they asked me to tone down the gags about Sarah Palin. I wanted to say she was forcing her teenage daughter to have a baby because she is so anti-abortion.

“But also, as a Republican she is pro-execution so she is going to give her the electric chair for being a little slut.

“They weren’t keen on that one.”

Neverthless, he did manage to include a reference to George W Bush as a “retarded cowboy” during the routine.

Last fall, the BBC suspended Ms. McCain’s favorite comedian over prank phone calls he made to British actor Andrew Sachs in which he made a string of lewd comments about the actor’s granddaughter:

Mr Sachs’s granddaughter, 23-year-old Georgina Baillie, said the family was still considering a formal complaint to police – a move that could lead to the presenters facing prosecution for making a nuisance call. She said: “What is funny about humiliating a lovely old man who has never harmed anyone in his life? We’re very close and I can’t tell you how much it hurts to know they were so unkind to such a sweet person. They should at least pay for what they’ve done with their jobs.”

Ross and Brand left a series of obscene messages on the answering machine when they could not reach Mr Sachs, 78, for a pre-arranged phone interview. Each message, aired on October 18 after senior producers authorised the programme for broadcast, contained lewd jibes about how Brand he had slept with Ms Bailie. Further transcripts of the programme have emerged in which Ross and Brand joke about breaking into Mr Sachs’ house and performing a sex act on him by way of apology.
Ms Bailie, a burlesque performer known as Voluptua, confirmed she slept with him three times in late 2006 but said: “It was never going to be a serious relationship but I felt I could trust him as a friend. I feel utterly exposed and betrayed.

“What happened between us was supposed to be private but he is clearly no gentleman. What girl would ever want to have to tell their granddad who she slept with? He hasn’t asked me about it because he is too much of a gentleman – unlike Russell Brand.”

She added: “It was bad enough that they recorded these things on my grand-father’s answer machine but astonishing the BBC saw fit to broadcast it when they could have stopped it.”

What, exactly, does Ms. McCain find “freaking hilarious” about Russell Brand? If not his diatribes against social conservatives and mockery of 9/11, then what? Is it the photo of him urinating in the desert? The videos of him prancing around in his underwear? Or perhaps we’re just too old and too unhip to understand the humor and need to lighten up in order to broaden our base? Is that the takeaway?

How, exactly, does Ms. McCain reconcile her fervent disdain for Coulter with her fevered endorsement of an anti-American vulgarian who hates everything the Republican Party stands for?

I’d freaking like to know.

***

Related good read today: Kyle Smith in the New York Post is ready to convert and become a new liberal media star.

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Like Father, Like Daughter? « Patriot Burr
  2. Michelle Malkin spanks Meghan McCain « The Daley Gator
  3. Jules Crittenden » Iowa Buzz
  4. Hey Meghan McCain-How about a One on One debate with a kid you doesn’t exist? « Time to Choose Again
  5. Michelle Malkin comparing Ann Coulter to a comedian… and will soon issue the list of approved comedians! « Cowardly political musings…
  6. The Other McCain: Michelle Malkin brings the Mother Of All Punk-Smackings down on BBW Meghan McCain
  7. Megyn McCain needs to STFU and go away already | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  8. Five Hours Ahead » Blog Archive » Damaged Brand (contd)
  9. Dear MSM: I Hate Rush and Palin. Hire Me As Your House Conservative! | KyleSmithOnline.com
  10. Conservatives vs. Meghan McCain - Liberal Values - Defending Liberty and Enlightened Thought
  11. threedonia.com » Smith: Can I be your token conservative?
  12. Random Thoughts From Marybeth
  13. Catfight III « The TrogloPundit
  14. Video: Tucker Carlson calls Jon Stewart a "Sanctimonious, Partisan Hack" | Mofo Politics | Hoping Obama fails
  15. What if it was Sarah who made Hillary’s trip? « Jim Blazsik
  16. Ed Driscoll » I Never Sold Out Before Because Nobody Ever Asked Me
  17. Kyle Smith of the New York Post has fun with Meghan McCain and others « Danishova
  18. Reviewer Reviewed! | KyleSmithOnline.com
  19. Meghan McCain--Democrat in disguise? - Conservative Republican Discussion Forums
  20. Video: Meghan McCain on "The View", tells Laura Ingraham to "Kiss My Fat Ass" - 3/16/09 | Mofo Politics | Hoping Obama fails
  21. Seymour Nuts » Quick Hits from the Weekend
  22. Laura Ingraham Calls Meghan McCain Fat, Whines Obnoxiously When Criticized. Also, The Chawner family of England is enormously fat. | Popehat
  23. Phil Bronstein: A Weighty Battle Gets Uglier — Can We All Be a Little More Sensitive?
  24. The Sword and the Olive Branch » Blog Archive » On Meghan McCain
  25. The mind is the primary weapon - 039
  26. Tennesseefree.com » Rush Limbaugh’s Challenge to Liberals, eloquently expressed by…the LA Times.
  27. Rush Limbaugh's Challenge to Liberals, eloquently expressed by...the LA Times.
  28. Megan McCain - Feh « Nice Deb
  29. Michelle Malkin » G20 thugs impersonate police, break into bank
  30. Hypocrisy Flashback: Sarah Palin’s Campaign Wardrobe Attacks « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  31. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » ‘Future of the GOP’ really seems to dig anti-GOP entertainment
  32. Banned & Defamed by UK, Radio Talk Show Host Michael Savage Pushes Back | Updated 5/15/2009 « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  33. Meghan McCain Lashes Out at Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter | Christopher Howell
  34. Pajamas Media » Why Levi Johnston Matters

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #649253
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Mookie said:

    It’s okay, I’m prepared for the zombie invasion

    Somewhere, Chap’s radar just went off. :lol:

  2. #649255
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:41 pm, flmom said:

    Somewhere, Chap’s radar just went off. :lol:

    Oh no, now you’ve been and gone and done it.

  3. #649256
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:41 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, happyscrapper said:
    Hey Boiler…I assume you went to Purdue. So did my daughter. Very nice campus!

    Yep, it was a good school…graduated almost 10 years ago. The “P” stands for Purdue, not my name, BTW.

    Your daughter made a good choice ;)

  4. #649257
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:43 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:34 pm, Mookie said:

    Somewhere, Chap’s radar just went off. :lol:

    Does Chap support the zombies?

  5. #649259
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Does Chap support the zombies?

    Actually, I believe Chap IS a zombie. But don’t tell him I said that!

  6. #649262
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, Shay said:

    It’s not her weight. It’s not her voice. It’s not her looks.

    It’s her brains – or rather the lack thereof – she’s stooooooopid. Not a secret, that.

  7. #649263
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:50 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:46 pm, happyscrapper said
    Actually, I believe Chap IS a zombie. But don’t tell him I said that!

    Ah…well, I’m ready for him.

  8. #649265
    On March 15th, 2009 at 5:51 pm, redpeach said:

    Mookie said, “I think that if the tax laws were changed so that gay couples who have civil unions receive the equal tax/health care benefits of straight couples, the marriage issue would fade away.”

    Serious question: Then why haven’t they been pushing for changes to the tax code rather than wanting their unions defined as marriages? I have long wondered this – if it’s really about the benefits that are afforded married couples, then why aren’t they working to change the specifics of the laws that don’t allow those benefits?

  9. #649272
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:03 pm, flmom said:

    redpeach said:

    Serious question: Then why haven’t they been pushing for changes to the tax code rather than wanting their unions defined as marriages?

    Bingo!! Thank you for putting the obvious into one sentence.

  10. #649273
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:06 pm, Huskergirl said:

    I’m not surprised that political commentary is coming from someone with so little life experience.

  11. #649274
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, Joy said:

    24K – I found it! I had to click “Show all headlines” to see it. Thanks.

    Great article except the part where he claims MM is anti-immigration… the dolt. She’s anti-ILLEGAL immigration ivasion, duh.

  12. #649275
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:10 pm, Joy said:

    Or maybe even iNvasion…

  13. #649276
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:17 pm, TanyaB said:

    She described herself as a progressive Republican. Why no just go another step and be a moderate democrat?

    She is looking for fame, thinks she’s gorgeous, and brilliant. So she has to say something newsworthy. “Hmmm Ann Coulter would get my name on t.v., think I’ll attack her with all my brilliance”

  14. #649285
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:24 pm, RetFireman said:

    Hey Fireman, are you turning into a “dirty old man” or have you always been one? Ha!! Anyway, I know you are single, and so is she, so go for it!!

    HEY!!! I’m not old. I’m a young guy and it is purely out of interest in helping Conservatism.

  15. #649286
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:24 pm, Mookie said:

    Serious question: Then why haven’t they been pushing for changes to the tax code rather than wanting their unions defined as marriages? I have long wondered this – if it’s really about the benefits that are afforded married couples, then why aren’t they working to change the specifics of the laws that don’t allow those benefits?

    That’s a good question. There are groups that have been pushing to change the tax code but they don’t get a lot of attention because it’s not as headline grabbing as Prop. 8 or other marriage initiatives. There’s also the issue of how the federal government would recognize a gay couple that is eligible for those benefits. Without nationwide domestic partnerships or civil unions, there would be nothing in which to differentiate between a committed gay couple and one that’s just looking to looking for a tax break.

  16. #649287
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:25 pm, Mookie said:

    looking to looking for a tax break.

    Wow. I don’t even have alcohol to blame for that.

  17. #649290
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, happyscrapper said:

    HEY!!! I’m not old. I’m a young guy and it is purely out of interest in helping Conservatism.

    Ha! “dirty old man” is a rhetorical statement. Doesn’t mean you are actually old. But I notice your username is RetFireman, which I assumed was short for Retired? Maybe not. But again, I don’t think a person is necessarily old just because they are retired either…I am retired and don’t think I am OLD. Elderly maybe, but OLD? No way. Now, have I talked myself out of your “wrath”, or have I made it worse?

  18. #649292
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, RetFireman said:

    Retired yes, but for injuries sustained on the job.

  19. #649293
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:32 pm, RetFireman said:

    And wrath?? To you?? No way!!

  20. #649298
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:43 pm, moc23 said:

    If she really wants to help the Republican Party – then she should recast herself as a Democrat and pull them rightward. She’d be more believable that way.

    As it stands now, she is not a Republican or Conservative, and should stop identifying with my Party.

  21. #649304
    On March 15th, 2009 at 6:59 pm, 24Klady said:

    Joy, you are right about the “anti-immigrant” slant. Love it when somebody criticizes a political opinion and fails to read the book! Aw, well. I’m sure they are the youngest and brightest in the publishing world and MM was gracious…

  22. #649331
    On March 15th, 2009 at 8:03 pm, ErinF said:

    Does anybody really care what she has to say? I know I don’t.

  23. #649349
    On March 15th, 2009 at 8:28 pm, Mookie said:

    FWIW, Meghan updated her Twitter and said she didn’t know about Brand dressing as Bin Laden or the anti-American rants and apologized.

  24. #649371
    On March 15th, 2009 at 8:56 pm, frayed said:

    That fruitcake didn’t fall far from the tree.

  25. #649395
    On March 15th, 2009 at 9:39 pm, 24Klady said:

    Meg’s mom, Cindy McCain, is a tough act to follow. Ya think Meg/Meggy might be trying desperately to create a larger image for herself than the one lost any time they walk into a room together. Graduating a fine college then moving to Hollywood/Beverly Hills or whatever other ritzy address is not going to change the fact that she’s sheltered, not really all that sophisticated – but wants to be with the in-crowd and willing to say and do just about anything to get there. Perfect fodder for Paris and the girls to get her on track.

  26. #649420
    On March 15th, 2009 at 10:35 pm, Laree said:

    So John McCain is planning on Retiring from the Senate after this term? He thinks the Republicans are going to come out and vote for him after this? The apple doesn’t fall far from the Tree huh? This is what the McCains really think of Republicans and Conservatives? It’s good to know, will a Democrat Senator from Arizona really make that big a difference, then him sitting in the seat? I am done giving his “Seed” anymore attention, they want to alienate the base, let them it isn’t like he didn’t already let down a lot of people last November maybe it is time for him to retire. The best I can tell by his kid dissing real CONSERVATIVES she is just VAPID and SELF ABSORBED my last word, I am not going to contribute to another thread about someone so superficial.

  27. #649440
    On March 15th, 2009 at 10:59 pm, emjem24 said:

    Meghan McCain is nothing but a sheep. She may have had a high-priced education, but I see that like many of her generation, the “educated,” that she checked her curiousity and integrity at the door along with her father. I think it hilarious how Lefties continually bleat how they have the “educated” in their corner yet these same “educated” individuals know nothing about what made this country or how it functions.

    The MSM want to appoint her the new “spokesperson” of the GOP 20 somethings but that doesn’t make it so. You would have to “dig” real deep to find what exactly her “core” beliefs actually are… such as gay marriage. She really is a chip off the old block.

  28. #649483
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:08 am, California Red said:

    Ms. McCain has endeared herself to the liberal media and she will be annointed as the voice of the new republicans.

    She player her cards right coming out against Ann because it elevated her profile significantly.

  29. #649489
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:44 am, Laree said:

    Elevated her profile significantly? Ann Coulter won’t bother to respond and Laura Ingraham calls her chubby…yeah Republicans are really taking her serious…give me a break.

  30. #649495
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:16 am, love2rumba said:

    You would have to “dig” real deep to find what exactly her “core” beliefs actually are.

    If one did that there might not be anything left of her….

  31. #649562
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:08 am, md1964 said:

    The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. She learned her slobbering, Liberal A$$-kissing style from the best …. her dad.

  32. #649569
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:21 am, mike.musculus said:

    [1of 2]
    This morning, while helping Dad w/his rehab, he opened up slightly abt politics. He’s been avoiding it ever since he wokeup and found that Obie was president.

    We talked abt the Progressive Movement. What he told me was that when people call themselves Progressive-Democrats/ Republicans, think of them politically as putting the period after the Progressive, because their philosophy and guiding principles are the same — no matter what the follow the hyphen with.

    Another way to think of it is like M&Ms: they’re all exactly the same inside, just different color shells (Dad said they even taste the same, but I *still* think the orange ones taste best[wink]).

    This explains a lot abt McCain’s friendship w/HRC. They are PROGRESSIVES, and they’ve taken over both parties. It explains the kabuki: those who think that while the “Progressive-” are running the Repubs we have just 1 political party are correct! They simply hyphanate with another movement so as to infiltrate and take it over. Read about the Fabians, and the other groups of the Progressive movement… you’ll see McCalamnity and Her Thighness there, by their actions — and most of the pundits who call themselves “Conservatives” (Frum, etc) too.

    He related to me the last time this happened: FDR’s “Me Too” Republicans were Progressives, too. The difference is they didn’t have as complete control of the party machinery as they have today. The fight behind the scenes to regain control by the remaining Rs & Ds was difficult, but was make possible because of the acclaim of returning heroes from WW2. The Returning Hero status allowed them to go directly to the public, bypassing the “stops” ie the controls the Ps had built-in to retain control. The public lionzed these returning heroes, and it would have finished the Ps if they’d tried to fight it.

    These Heroes knew that Progressives are Socialists with a colorful candy shell. They (mostly) took back the parties – hence Term Limits on the Presidency.

  33. #649576
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:37 am, mike.musculus said:

    [2of 2]
    He said it was no accident that the people who set the rules stacked the deck so McCain won the primaries. The party machinery is still run by Ps, and they’re always the same.

    [Running out of time, have an appointment...]

    I’d like to post everything he told me, because it explains alot about what’s happened, but I’m out of time, so let me finish w/this:
    The other thing of high import he stressed was that the excoriation of “Ideological Purity” is not accidental, nor is it isolated — it is a core tactic/tool of the Progressive Movement that they use against competing ideologies and philosophies! When you view it in that light, and thing abt the reasons behind it, you’ll understand that we must absolutely discount every voice that clamors against Principle — especially those using the “…you Puriests[sp?] are going to drive everybody away…” hammer!

    Wow! Wish I had time to state that better — but I can not be late for my appt! Bye All!

  34. #649580
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:43 am, misterbee241 said:

    I’ve never been impressed with Megan McCain, just like i’m not impressed with her father.
    She was on Hannity the other night and I wondered, if her head collapses when the air gets low in it. I know that’s personal, but that was the thought running through MY head. She’s got all of the external requirements for TV, but the brain power is just not there.

  35. #649586
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:48 am, max said:

    That column was freaking awesome Michelle.

  36. #649692
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:08 am, Salt said:

    Related good read today: Kyle Smith in the New York Post is ready to convert and become a new liberal media star.

    I saw Kyle Smith’s column early this morning and loved it. Happy to see it cross linked here and also recommend it for humor value on the drool bucket “conservatives”.

  37. #649772
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:51 am, pabarge said:

    100% Michelle, but if Laura did say anything about McCain’s weight, Laura should be ashamed of herself.

  38. #650464
    On March 16th, 2009 at 7:57 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Her real problem is she has a dumb mama and dumb daddy.

  39. #650617
    On March 17th, 2009 at 12:27 am, atheling said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 7:57 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Yeah, but at least they’re not related, like yours.

  40. #657613
    On March 24th, 2009 at 3:01 pm, wckelly60 said:

    My problem with Meghan is that she’s 24. What are her chops? WHAT HAS SHE DONE WITH HER LIFE THAT HAS GIVEN HER THE EXPERIENCE TO MAKE PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW WHAT SHE THINKS? She’s the daughter of a failed presidential candidate. Last fall she was the daughter of a presidential candidate running a pitiful campaign.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’d take her to Vegas for a weekend but I wouldn’t care about her opinion on anything except the mirrors on the ceiling.

  41. #718135
    On June 11th, 2009 at 1:38 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    If the liberal media is saying conservatives should support Meghan McCain and her so-called “conservative principles” – run for the hills. We can’t trust a damn thing the press says–that’s how we got stuck with John McCain as our candidate in the last election. We should be running away from them both!! They’re just closet liberals.

  42. #718140
    On June 11th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Yeah, IHMC #228: just like the couple we have currently occupying the White House – welcome to the new USSR.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook