<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geithner crawls on his knees to AIG; Plus: Sunday open thread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:33:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulldroolcup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-2/#comment-650629</link>
		<dc:creator>fulldroolcup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-650629</guid>
		<description>Yeah, just a followup.  I was right. MOST of the AIG people getting  commissions/bonuses/retenttion incentives are NOT in the toxic assets 
category.  So...Frack you all.

Make up yer frackin minds:  do you want AIG to fail?  If so, do you want a shiteload of commerce to grind to a halt, worldwide.  Then drive the &quot;performers&quot; from the company. 

Do you want AIG to succeed?: then keep yer frackin hands off the bonuses/commissions/retentions of the people who CAN make the company survive.

I feel I&#039;m dealing with KOS and DU people here.

Sorry to see so many &quot;conservatives&quot; hating &quot;the rich&quot;, whether or not they&#039;ve ever worked on commission themselves.

Ditto those who think any jackass can step into the shoes of people in the PROFITABLE parts of AIG business.

I sense I&#039;m in the company of a bunch of Japanese &quot;sararimen&quot;  here:  a bunch of staff people who have NEVER had to &quot;make a number&quot;, or die if they don&#039;t.

And that includes YOU, MM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, just a followup.  I was right. MOST of the AIG people getting  commissions/bonuses/retenttion incentives are NOT in the toxic assets<br />
category.  So&#8230;Frack you all.</p>
<p>Make up yer frackin minds:  do you want AIG to fail?  If so, do you want a shiteload of commerce to grind to a halt, worldwide.  Then drive the &#8220;performers&#8221; from the company. </p>
<p>Do you want AIG to succeed?: then keep yer frackin hands off the bonuses/commissions/retentions of the people who CAN make the company survive.</p>
<p>I feel I&#8217;m dealing with KOS and DU people here.</p>
<p>Sorry to see so many &#8220;conservatives&#8221; hating &#8220;the rich&#8221;, whether or not they&#8217;ve ever worked on commission themselves.</p>
<p>Ditto those who think any jackass can step into the shoes of people in the PROFITABLE parts of AIG business.</p>
<p>I sense I&#8217;m in the company of a bunch of Japanese &#8220;sararimen&#8221;  here:  a bunch of staff people who have NEVER had to &#8220;make a number&#8221;, or die if they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>And that includes YOU, MM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twofoot</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-2/#comment-649806</link>
		<dc:creator>twofoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649806</guid>
		<description>DoD has decided to stop selling expended brass to civilian reloaders.  This will result in taking millions of rounds of ammo off the market.  Not just .223 or 7.62.  This will effect &lt;strong&gt;everyone&lt;/strong&gt; that shoots.

http://www.theshootist.net/2009/03/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military.html

This will quadruple the price of &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; ammo in just a few months.  

Who wants to bet this was a directive from 1600 Pennsylvania?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DoD has decided to stop selling expended brass to civilian reloaders.  This will result in taking millions of rounds of ammo off the market.  Not just .223 or 7.62.  This will effect <strong>everyone</strong> that shoots.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theshootist.net/2009/03/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theshootist.net/2009/03/dod-ends-sale-of-expended-military.html</a></p>
<p>This will quadruple the price of <strong>all</strong> ammo in just a few months.  </p>
<p>Who wants to bet this was a directive from 1600 Pennsylvania?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; AIG: Ain&#8217;t it gag-worthy?</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-2/#comment-649782</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; AIG: Ain&#8217;t it gag-worthy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649782</guid>
		<description>[...] snorted this weekend over the fecklessness of Tiny Tim Geithner, crawling on his knees to AIG in an attempt to avert a public relations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] snorted this weekend over the fecklessness of Tiny Tim Geithner, crawling on his knees to AIG in an attempt to avert a public relations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laree</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-2/#comment-649733</link>
		<dc:creator>Laree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649733</guid>
		<description>Imus announces he has stage II prostate cancer this morning.

http://imustimes.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/wabc-imus-announces-cancer-developing/

Depressing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imus announces he has stage II prostate cancer this morning.</p>
<p><a href="http://imustimes.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/wabc-imus-announces-cancer-developing/" rel="nofollow">http://imustimes.wordpress.com/2009/03/16/wabc-imus-announces-cancer-developing/</a></p>
<p>Depressing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillwaiting</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-2/#comment-649460</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649460</guid>
		<description>We taxpayers are bailing out one of my co-workers who gambled and lost on her mortgage--she and her husband have the money to pay their mortgage, but the house is now worth less than they owe and they don&#039;t want to live up to the deal they cut on the mortgage.  The bank is forgiving the $150k she&#039;ll owe after the short sale of her home.  She was indignant that she might have to claim that forgiven debt as income.  She now says she won&#039;t have too.  Why does that seem like adding insult to injury for those of us who are responsible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We taxpayers are bailing out one of my co-workers who gambled and lost on her mortgage&#8211;she and her husband have the money to pay their mortgage, but the house is now worth less than they owe and they don&#8217;t want to live up to the deal they cut on the mortgage.  The bank is forgiving the $150k she&#8217;ll owe after the short sale of her home.  She was indignant that she might have to claim that forgiven debt as income.  She now says she won&#8217;t have too.  Why does that seem like adding insult to injury for those of us who are responsible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What if it was Sarah who made Hillary&#8217;s trip? &#171; Jim Blazsik</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649429</link>
		<dc:creator>What if it was Sarah who made Hillary&#8217;s trip? &#171; Jim Blazsik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649429</guid>
		<description>[...] Culture of corruption: Banking hypocrite Maxine Waters By Michelle Malkin*The trouble with Meghan McCain By Michelle Malkin* [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Culture of corruption: Banking hypocrite Maxine Waters By Michelle Malkin*The trouble with Meghan McCain By Michelle Malkin* [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649428</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649428</guid>
		<description>Just watching Bernanke interview on &quot;60 Minutes&quot; where he made his feelings about AIG crystal clear: they are a rogue company that made monstrously bad bets. He is very angry about having to bail them out. (No questions on Paulson/Geithner policy).

He also stated clearly that it is critical that our politicians show the political will to deal with this. (Implying that they aren&#039;t?)

I take his willingness to take the unprecedented step of allowing himself to be interviewed on the most watched show on television as a desperate plea for our politicians to get their act together. 

It was also very interesting that he wasn&#039;t asked any questions about the various stimulus bills or fiscal policy in general. His comments addressed Fed actions only.

Most trenchant comment (and I paraphrase): &lt;em&gt;&quot;We are on the brink of a depression that we may never recover from if we don&#039;t handle this right.&quot; 
&lt;/em&gt;
Fed chairmen never do or say such things. I take it as a deliberate signal that things are going very badly among the entrenched criminal class of windbags Mr. Bernanke is saddled with in Washington.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just watching Bernanke interview on &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221; where he made his feelings about AIG crystal clear: they are a rogue company that made monstrously bad bets. He is very angry about having to bail them out. (No questions on Paulson/Geithner policy).</p>
<p>He also stated clearly that it is critical that our politicians show the political will to deal with this. (Implying that they aren&#8217;t?)</p>
<p>I take his willingness to take the unprecedented step of allowing himself to be interviewed on the most watched show on television as a desperate plea for our politicians to get their act together. </p>
<p>It was also very interesting that he wasn&#8217;t asked any questions about the various stimulus bills or fiscal policy in general. His comments addressed Fed actions only.</p>
<p>Most trenchant comment (and I paraphrase): <em>&#8220;We are on the brink of a depression that we may never recover from if we don&#8217;t handle this right.&#8221;<br />
</em><br />
Fed chairmen never do or say such things. I take it as a deliberate signal that things are going very badly among the entrenched criminal class of windbags Mr. Bernanke is saddled with in Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillwaiting</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649342</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649342</guid>
		<description>Michelle,

Thanks so much for the open thread.  Of course now I find myself without anything interesting to share.  I turned 50 last week and I seem to be turning into Grandpa Simpson...nothing coherent to share!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for the open thread.  Of course now I find myself without anything interesting to share.  I turned 50 last week and I seem to be turning into Grandpa Simpson&#8230;nothing coherent to share!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stillwaiting</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649339</link>
		<dc:creator>Stillwaiting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649339</guid>
		<description>Those bonuses are needed.  AIG can&#039;t afford to lose all those crackerjack executives who helped them lose $61.7 &lt;strong&gt;billion&lt;/strong&gt;!!!

You can&#039;t find quality exec&#039;s like that just anywhere...you&#039;ve got to turn over a lot of rocks to find worms like that!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those bonuses are needed.  AIG can&#8217;t afford to lose all those crackerjack executives who helped them lose $61.7 <strong>billion</strong>!!!</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t find quality exec&#8217;s like that just anywhere&#8230;you&#8217;ve got to turn over a lot of rocks to find worms like that!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BuckeyeSam</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649308</link>
		<dc:creator>BuckeyeSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649308</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 15th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, PhredE said: 
Maybe a previous poster had already covered this question, and I missed it, but…

How can a company that lost $50+ billion in the most recent quarter pay any bonus to anyone? - much less, relying on government printed cash to do so with… Tell me “it ain’t so!” 

***&lt;/blockquote&gt;

These are the questions to ask. First, what compensation scheme allows a company that lost $61.7 billion its most recent quarter to pay any bonuses whatsoever? And I suspect that the quarters leading up to the fourth were poor too. Second, how could the feds release this money without working this out in advance?

We are represented by colossal screw ups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 15th, 2009 at 12:08 pm, PhredE said:<br />
Maybe a previous poster had already covered this question, and I missed it, but…</p>
<p>How can a company that lost $50+ billion in the most recent quarter pay any bonus to anyone? &#8211; much less, relying on government printed cash to do so with… Tell me “it ain’t so!” </p>
<p>***</p></blockquote>
<p>These are the questions to ask. First, what compensation scheme allows a company that lost $61.7 billion its most recent quarter to pay any bonuses whatsoever? And I suspect that the quarters leading up to the fourth were poor too. Second, how could the feds release this money without working this out in advance?</p>
<p>We are represented by colossal screw ups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCloud9</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649281</link>
		<dc:creator>McCloud9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649281</guid>
		<description>Hmmmmm... 170 BILLION Dollars.
WoW, that is alot of money. It did get me thinking about someone tho who NEVER Recieved a BAILOUT... Just a Bullet.

http://www.rense.com/general75/kahl.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmmm&#8230; 170 BILLION Dollars.<br />
WoW, that is alot of money. It did get me thinking about someone tho who NEVER Recieved a BAILOUT&#8230; Just a Bullet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general75/kahl.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general75/kahl.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fulldroolcup</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649277</link>
		<dc:creator>fulldroolcup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649277</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Please read: The bonuses are going almost exclusively to those who created the toxic assets.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

D&#039;oh!!! That&#039;s what I get for listening to Chris Wallace, who said (without his guest admin spokesman Austan Goolsbee contradicting him) that the recipients included performers in the life insurance side of the business. 

If the article is correct, then....my arguments don&#039;t apply, since the $$ to pay such folks has to be public money, not AIG&#039;s. 

But since no authors are identified:  that&#039;s my story, and I&#039;m sticking to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Please read: The bonuses are going almost exclusively to those who created the toxic assets.</p></blockquote>
<p>D&#8217;oh!!! That&#8217;s what I get for listening to Chris Wallace, who said (without his guest admin spokesman Austan Goolsbee contradicting him) that the recipients included performers in the life insurance side of the business. </p>
<p>If the article is correct, then&#8230;.my arguments don&#8217;t apply, since the $$ to pay such folks has to be public money, not AIG&#8217;s. </p>
<p>But since no authors are identified:  that&#8217;s my story, and I&#8217;m sticking to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dpt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649264</link>
		<dc:creator>dpt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649264</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Treasury Department determined that the government did not have the legal authority to block the current payments by the company.&quot;

If the government does not have the authority to block these bonuses, how about at least publishing the names and photos of those executives and employees receiving the bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Treasury Department determined that the government did not have the legal authority to block the current payments by the company.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the government does not have the authority to block these bonuses, how about at least publishing the names and photos of those executives and employees receiving the bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildcatter1980</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649246</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildcatter1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649246</guid>
		<description>This action by AIG is another indicator that supports my belief that the reason the Wall Street financial types ran to their bud Hank Paulsen in D.C. was to save their big bucks bonuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This action by AIG is another indicator that supports my belief that the reason the Wall Street financial types ran to their bud Hank Paulsen in D.C. was to save their big bucks bonuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bailouts for Liars, Illegal Aliens, and Undeserved Bonuses&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/15/sunday-open-thread-6/comment-page-1/#comment-649241</link>
		<dc:creator>Bailouts for Liars, Illegal Aliens, and Undeserved Bonuses&#160;&#124;&#160;OpenMarket.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24688#comment-649241</guid>
		<description>[...] managers of the insurance giant AIG, which is being bailed out by taxpayers at a cost of over $170 billion, are using taxpayer money for hundreds of millions of dollars in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] managers of the insurance giant AIG, which is being bailed out by taxpayers at a cost of over $170 billion, are using taxpayer money for hundreds of millions of dollars in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

