Drool Bucket Award of the day

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 16, 2009 10:48 AM

For crying out loud. Monday’s barely begun and the Obamedia already has me reaching for a double-strength airsickness bag. New York magazine’s Stacy Schiff gets the overflowing drool bucket of the day award for her ode to Barack and Michelle Obama’s lust for each other — as symbolized in a mundane Inauguration Night shot of them bumping heads together in a freight elevator (hat tip: Newsbusters). Michelle Obama wears her husband’s jacket, and Schiff takes it as a sign of Kingdom Come. This is just the introduction:

Look, Ma, no hands! Only one cool forehead and some extra-strength hairspray touch, and yet everything combusts in this Inauguration Night photo. Not since Doris Day and Rock Hudson split a pair of pajamas—also under intoxicating circumstances, if not in a freight elevator—has there been such chemistry in a shared outfit. Admit it, if you were one of the Secret Service guys, you’d find your BlackBerry suddenly compelling too. And if you’re a woman, you want what she’s having. Here is the answer to Freud’s question; the black tie is optional.

You could be uncharitable: She outranked and outearned him. And after she had gamely explained the concept of billable hours, he went on to sabotage her career, introduce her to single motherhood, and shrink her salary. Under the circumstances, the least Obama can do is offer his wife his jacket. It’s been a long time, after all, since anyone sat on her stoop and aspired to be First Lady. Reese Witherspoon aside, no one goes to Harvard Law to be reduced to her wardrobe. The reason to get a fancy education is to avoid having to fuss about the fancy dress.

But we’re in uncharted territory here. The gesture is sweetly old-fashioned, redolent of letter sweaters, gallantry, and Cary Grant. The girl is spicy and newfangled. She’s ushering us around a social corner as much as a political one. Professional rivals, Rock and Doris leaped out of bed in those pj’s the year Obama was born; only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

Here’s more. Get ready to hurl:

In recent weeks, so much focus has been placed on Michelle Obama’s biceps, but I’m much more excited about the rest of her body. Especially her hips. Those beautiful curves are hopefully sending a message to women of all ethnicities—but black women like me in particular (and of course young girls)—that having some meat on your bones is and always has been a blessing you don’t have to be ashamed of. I think she should make a video: The First Lady’s Guide to Fitness and Self-Love or something.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Media Bias

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:52 am, quixoticBen said:

    Yeah, nothing like a gal with a giant racial chip and an incompetent socialist President to get those romantic juices flowing. Puke.

  2. #2
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:52 am, Jeff2161 said:

    You could be uncharitable: She outranked and outearned him. And after she had gamely explained the concept of billable hours, he went on to sabotage her career, introduce her to single motherhood, and shrink her salary.

    WTF ?
    :shock:

  3. #3
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:53 am, happyscrapper said:

    only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

    What does that even mean? That the author of that sugary piece has never before seen a “functioning marriage?” Also, what is meant by “he introduced her to single motherhood”?

  4. #4
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:54 am, hawkeye54 said:

    bumping heads together in a freight elevator

    Say, can’t doing that lead to potential brain damage? Reading this entire article and any like it certainly can.

  5. #5
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:54 am, cpodug said:

    I haven’t been feeling too good this morning. This sent me over the top. Thanks, Michelle. I now have an excuse to go home.

  6. #6
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:55 am, yak_rider said:


    For crying out loud. Monday’s barely begun and the Obamedia already has me reaching for a double-strength airsickness bag.

    You’d better lay in a large supply of those bags, the media’s verbal fellatio shows no sign of slowing down.

  7. #7
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:56 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    You could be uncharitable: She outranked and outearned him. And after she had gamely explained the concept of billable hours, he went on to sabotage her career, introduce her to single motherhood, and shrink her salary.

    so THAT’S what happened to her Law License. I thought she turned it in before she could be convicted.

    Silly me

  8. #8
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:57 am, Misscheryl said:

    Sorry Michelle, with the anger I feel right now, it’s best I don’t read this!

  9. #9
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:58 am, Old Tanker said:

    Thanks for posting that before lunch…..

  10. #10
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am, GregGates said:

    only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

    Ridiculous hyperbole and offensive. Get over yourself and take a cold shower along the way.

  11. #11
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am, wighttrasch said:

    only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

    maybe you are only now discovering this, but I’ve been in a wonderfully functioning marriage for a long time now.

  12. #12
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:01 am, jsr said:

    This goes beyond the usual slobbering sycophancy. That passage is barely comprehensible, almost as if the writer was using hallucinogenic drugs or speaking in tongues. But, I suppose that is the effect Dear Leader has on his followers.

  13. #13
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:05 am, happyscrapper said:

    maybe you are only now discovering this, but I’ve been in a wonderfully functioning marriage for a long time now.

    Me too! And, we are equals! The only vision conjured up in my head when I (seldom) think of Obama and Michelle in the WH, is the two of them up in their private quarters, bumping their fists together and laughingly shouting, “NOW, WE FINALLY HAVE THE POWER TO STICK IT TO THE MAN!

  14. #14
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:05 am, wighttrasch said:

    Schiff takes it as a sign of Kingdom Come

    Oh, MM–you cheeky minx.

  15. #15
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:06 am, kudafa said:

    Can’t quite understand how The He reduced The She to “single motherhood.” Just what is “single motherhood,”anyway? This may be news to Schiff, but it takes two to tango. If The O’s are into domination or something, I sure don’t want to know about it. If Schiff isn’t aware of reproductive biology, I have some books with real pretty pictures she could look at. Let me brag just a second here; If Schiff doesn’t know what a functional marriage looks like, she can stop by our house. I’ve been married to the most fabulous woman in the world for over 30 years now.

  16. #16
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:08 am, madmonkphotog said:

    New York magazine’s Stacy Schiff gets the overflowing drool bucket of the day award for her ode to Barack and Michelle Obama’s lust for each other…

    Quite frankly, this is all the media has left. Mein Fuhrer’s policy have failed at breakneck speed.

    And yes. I do hope he fails.

  17. #17
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:08 am, 1sttofight said:

    Stacy Shiff DOES know that Rock Hudson was Queer as a three dollar bill, Right, Right???

    Not really a good comparison.

    But then maybe it is.

  18. #18
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:09 am, granite said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:59 am, wighttrasch said:

    only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

    maybe you are only now discovering this, but I’ve been in a wonderfully functioning marriage for a long time now.

    Excellent point
    Likewise, agreed.

    This fool would likely think herself brilliant if she were to rediscover the wheel:
    “Hey, this round thing rolls!
    What a great idea!
    I gotta tell someone about this!”

  19. #19
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Cosmo said:

    In the words of my wonderful spouse, the only appropriate response to some people “WTF?”

    Stacy Schiff is one of these people.

  20. #20
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:12 am, wighttrasch said:

    granite, et al….most of these types would sh!t themselves if they could see how wonderful my marriage is…and just celebrated 22 years this week.

  21. #21
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:13 am, rocketman said:

    ***
    Stacy Schiff and the New York Magazine will get their WAKE UP CALL when they do their 2009 and / or 2010 tax returns–unless she is laid off before then and / or the magazine folds before then.
    ***
    The Michelle Obama / Barack Obama “star power” will be getting a little dim when the economic chickens come home to roost.
    ***
    As far as a marriage between equals–BONNIE AND CLYDE comes to mind. They got along very well as the robbed and murdered their way through “flyover country” in the 1930′s. A “marriage made in heaven” indeed.
    ***
    When I see this pair of clowns in action stealing our country’s future I keep looking for masks and guns!
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  22. #22
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:13 am, flmom said:
  23. #23
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am, sonofdy said:

    I get it. They have a good marriage. So what?

    So did Lenin.

    Just because previous presidents didn’t openly molest each other in public, doesn’t mean they didn’t have a good relationship.

  24. #24
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am, granite said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:12 am, wighttrasch said:

    Good for you and God bless you both.

    We’re coming up to #32 in a couple of months.

  25. #25
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am, maine yankee said:

    It’s just an amazing concept liberals

  26. #26
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:15 am, sonofdy said:

    BTW sonofdys marriage???

    13 years.

  27. #27
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:15 am, 1sttofight said:

    Mrs. 1st has been putting up with me for 35+ years.

  28. #28
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:16 am, Salt said:

    I love my wife.

    I can haz oval office, too?

  29. #29
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:18 am, MBuck said:

    The First Lady’s Guide to Fitness and Self-Love or something.

    Please oh GOD can I never see that??

  30. #30
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:18 am, warden said:

    Here’s an idea for a money making venture for the new administration:

    Pay per view White House arm wrestling! First Michelle warms up on the effete cabinet, then the main attraction: Obama-a-Obama.

    I’ve got 10 on Michelle, who wants the skinny guy?

  31. #31
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:18 am, wighttrasch said:

    salt–har!

    yes, but do you have sex 6+ times a week?

  32. #32
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:20 am, JohnnyD said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:58 am, Old Tanker said:
    Thanks for posting that before lunch…..

    Now what am I to do with these wonderful pot roast leftovers?

    She’s ushering us around a social(ist) corner as much as a political one.

    Had to fix that. I feel better now.

  33. #33
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:21 am, rambler said:

    So they have a great marriage… whoopee. At least they have one good thing going for them. This deserves a barf bag rather than a drool bucket.

  34. #34
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:21 am, Bob1234 said:

    Now you’ve done it! I’ve got the dry heaves.

    Not since Doris Day and Rock Hudson split a pair of pajamas…

    Um, Doris and Rock? Is that really the analogy she was searching for? We all know how genuine that chemistry was.

  35. #35
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:23 am, FruNobulux said:

    I could only read a few sentences of it. What drivel.

  36. #36
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:25 am, happyscrapper said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:14 am, granite said:
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:12 am, wighttrasch said:
    Good for you and God bless you both.

    We’re coming up to #32 in a couple of months.

    Don’t take this as bragging, but we will celebrate our 40th in October. Anyone got me beat? I’ve had 10 of the best years of my life…the other 30, not so great. Just kidding!!!

    I have a question about Barry introducing Michelle to single motherhood. Does that mean they had a shotgun wedding? What else could it mean? Not that it matters, but did they get married because she was pregnant? I hadn’t heard that, but then, I don’t know a thing about Barry except that he had radical friends, preachers, and mentors.

  37. #37
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:26 am, CrazyFool said:

    Professional rivals, Rock [Hudson] and Doris [Day] leaped out of bed in those pj’s the year Obama was born; only now are we discovering what a functioning marriage between equals actually looks like.

    Speak for yourself – us on the right have known for a few centuries now…

    And besides…. wasn’t Rock Hudson gay?

    And what scares me is not how they look…. but how they think….

  38. #38
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:28 am, docflash said:

    A drool bucket is not enough for that lady,she needs a barrel.

  39. #39
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:30 am, irving said:

    Not since Doris Day and Rock Hudson split a pair of pajamas—also under intoxicating circumstances, if not in a freight elevator—has there been such chemistry in a shared outfit.

    The chemistry wasn’t real. Rock Hudson was gay.

  40. #40
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am, pueblo1032 said:

    GOOD GRIEF MICHELLE, you went and did it again!!! I just finished my pancakes, and you sneak this SLOBBER into my morning… I don’t think I can hold it back this time… I’ll bet this PILE OF DOGGIE DOO DOO calls herself a “JOURNALIST”… It is strange how DEFINITIONS change over time…

  41. #41
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Gag me with a silver spoon.

    Blech.

  42. #42
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:32 am, WarEagle82 said:

    Well, at least there was no picture of Nancy Pelosi today. Thank goodness (and good editors) for small miracles.

    This insane drivel is what happens when leftists gain control of media, banks, regulatory agencies, churches, government, etc. Thank goodness we still have the NRA. It looks like we are going to need it to take back all the other institutions…

  43. #43
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:34 am, MarcoPolo said:

    The chemistry wasn’t real. Rock Hudson was gay.

    I heart irony!

    Personally, my first thought was that you’d think with all that education, she’d be smart enough to wear long sleeves in February. Liberals are never big on common sense, though.

  44. #44
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:34 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    You are a hard person yak_rider #6, hard and cruel: can I use it? :) Please?

    So the Obamas love each other eh?

    YOU ONLY HURT THE ONE YOU LOVE

    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  45. #45
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:36 am, vickisoup said:

    But we’re in uncharted territory here. The gesture is sweetly old-fashioned, redolent of letter sweaters, gallantry, and Cary Grant.

    “Uncharted territory”? What in the world is she talking about? Frankly, she must have missed the “Ronald and Nancy”, “Bar and George”, and “GW and Laura” years, and be thinking only of the “Bill and Hill” charade of a marriage.
    Is there no depth to which these mediamatrons will sink in eschewing dignity?
    Good grief.
    :roll:

  46. #46
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:36 am, cicerokid said:

    “…The First Lady’s Guide to Fitness and Self-Love or something.”

    I touch myself!

  47. #47
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:36 am, cheapseat said:

    she is just showing her racial pride, you know that thing that white people used to have until it became a hate crime to express it. she wants the black bubble butt to become the new fashion statement, but i doubt it will succeed as the hemlimes will have to be cut on the bias,short in front/longer in back. oh the fashion faux pas if one gets her gown on backwards.

  48. #48
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:39 am, cngerms said:

    Not bumping heads; BUTTING heads over the fact that he hasn’t yet taken control of what’s left of the private sector.

  49. #49
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:40 am, mojack420 said:

    whats funny is Michelle obamas arms are so tone because she is black , a darker skin color shows off cuts and tone better then white. why do you think body builders and wrestlers do a lot of tanning, its makes their bodies look more cut up . but hey lets not a little fact get in the way of the obamaluvfest get in the way with that .

  50. #50
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:44 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Love, you want Love? I will give you Love–I Love this:

    Tender, Juicy Obama Fingers Hit the Shelves

    From those most accomplished goose steppers Der Spiegel. Auchtung!

    Workers of the World Unite and have some Obama Fried Chicken! Yum Yum.


    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  51. #51
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:47 am, cicerokid said:

    Did the media swoon like this over Mao Tse Tung? I’m too young to remember…

  52. #52
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:48 am, spidgy said:

    MO is devoid of any grace or polish.

  53. #53
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am, TXGator said:

    Well, by those standards, Hillary certainly has, let’s say, ample booty. I met her in 1994. Hard not to notice the wideness of the booty, but the main thing I noticed was her scowling and screaming at the secret service (I worked security in college).
    I wonder why no one wrote about Hillary’s butt?

  54. #54
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am, granite said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:47 am, cicerokid said:

    Did the media swoon like this over Mao Tse Tung? I’m too young to remember…

    Don’t remember about the media, but “Mao jackets” were a bit of a fashion craze in the mid-late 60s, if I remember right.

  55. #55
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:51 am, TXGator said:

    Bill Clinton’s supple breasts were also largely ignored, except by Monica maybe.

  56. #56
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:54 am, vickisoup said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:40 am, mojack420 said:
    whats funny is Michelle obamas arms are so tone because she is black

    Nah. I’m giving this sistah her due: MO had great arms. Still, those guns don’t overcome her crappy personality and frightening scowl, IMHO.
    8)

  57. #57
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:55 am, prendad said:

    Those beautiful curves are hopefully sending a message to women of all ethnicities—but black women like me in particular (and of course young girls)—that having some meat on your bones is and always has been a blessing you don’t have to be ashamed of.

    Hmmmm, a hippopotamus has a generous amount of meat on its bones also, but I never really thought much about the beauty angle. Now that Stacy Schiff has proffered her justification for overly meatly black women, maybe she can follow up with some excuses for overly bulbous rumps.

  58. #58
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:57 am, prendad said:

    I know, I know, RAAACIIISSSSSSST.

  59. #59
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:58 am, DBNinKY said:

    Talk about hypocrisy – juxtapose the above media slobbering w/ the way they insinuated Presidents GW Bush and Nixon treated their wives.

  60. #60
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, shooter said:

    0:57 am, Misscheryl said:
    Sorry Michelle, with the anger I feel right now, it’s best I don’t read this!

    Me too.
    I’m SOOOO frickin tired of these thieves stealing any chance of a real AMERICAN dream coming to fruition.

    Make sure you read this.
    PROOF Obama is destroying wealth in his idea of fairness. Redistribution by destruction.

  61. #61
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:03 pm, lottadawg said:

    OOOOyeah! I see it now. There’s a lot in common between Michelle Obama and Doris Day.

  62. #62
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:12 pm, JT said:

    Please make it stop.

  63. #63
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:20 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    No one HAS to write about Miss Hillary’s wideness shall we say. She needs it to store up all that venom and it gives resonance to that cackle. It is another Clinton twofer. Who mentioned hippopotamus? Nasty critters with a nasty temper and big teeth. Put a TuTu on them and they are still nasty critters with a nasty temper and big teeth, not that I am comparing Miss Hillary and SistaObama to hippopotami although they are nasty critters with nasty tempers and big teeth.

    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  64. #64
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:26 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Just compare the cackeling Shrillery Clinton and the radical fist bumping Michelle O. to the classiness of Laura Bush. In a First Lady of the U.S., I will take classy any day.

  65. #65
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:27 pm, flmom said:

    shooter said:

    I read that on Friday, very illuminating and very disturbing.

  66. #66
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:30 pm, Regulus said:

    Those beautiful curves are hopefully sending a message to women of all ethnicities—but black women like me in particular

    The only substantively informative text in the entire article: “Sista Blood!” Everything else is just an effort to rationalize the central idea.

  67. #67
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Michelle Obama meets the Governator-she could have dressed a bit more modestly I would think. But she is cut.

  68. #68
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:38 pm, mchristian said:

    Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter, Gerald and Bette Ford.

    And among the vice-presidents who can forget Al and Tipper Gore. Didn’t Al say they were the inspiration for Love Story long before he invented the internet and global warming.

  69. #69
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:46 pm, DianeK said:

    Not since Doris Day and Rock Hudson split a pair of pajamas—also under intoxicating circumstances, if not in a freight elevator

    Is she trying to say that BO is gay?

  70. #70
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    You could be uncharitable: She outranked and outearned him. And after she had gamely explained the concept of billable hours, he went on to sabotage her career, introduce her to single motherhood, and shrink her salary.

    He wouldn’t want his daughter punished with a child, but he went and did this to his wife! Oh the humanity! Why is Motherhood always a travesty to these retards?

  71. #71
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Hangfire said:

    Gag me with a trowel!

  72. #72
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, deedledee said:

    I needed a drool bucket the other day when I opened a Title 9 (women’s sports products) catalog; for there on the inside page was an ode to Michelle Obama. You can’t escape these people. A bit:

    “She does all of us post-Title IXer’s proud, But Michelle Obama is not singular, just the most visible of a whole generation of fit, powerful, post Title IX women. When we celebrate her, we are in fact, celebrating our own strength, our own true selves. And, … we’ve only just begun.”

    It is also posted online.

    http://www.timeoutwithtitlenine.com/missys-musings/yes-she-did/

    I did a search of their site for Sarah Palin, since she has actually mentioned the original Title IX…can you guess? No mention.

  73. #73
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    Gag me with an iced tea spoon….go deep, lets get it all out….and then the syrup of ipecac…..

    Where’s the stomach pump and a good gastro doc when you need one????

    What absolute tripe. They pay obamatrons to write this crap? Or do they just give them extra big “dub’l stuff” versions of the crap sandwiches along with their Jonestown Kool-Aid???

  74. #74
    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, RetFireman said:

    This is all setting up for an enormous fall.

    There is something that all narcissists have in common. That is the constant need to be told how great and wonderful they are. Add to that a person who had been abandoned by BOTH parents and it doesn’t take Sigmund Freud to give you the game plan.

    Just how much longer do you guys think it will take until a “mysetery” woman appears and tells all about an ellicit affair that is either taking place or has already taken place, with Der Fuhrer? How much longer will it take until some reporter for the Enquirer decides the money for such a person or for the photographs of such an event far outweighs any threats to keep such things quiet?

    With the background that Der Fuhrer has, coupled with one of the largest egos the world has ever seen, would anyone be at all surprised?

    And would Lady MacBeth put up with it the way Hill-Dawg has and stick around? Or will she actually make a stand for women against philandering husbands and divorce him? How ambitions is the woman, deep down?

  75. #75
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    DianeK said:
    Is she trying to say that BO is gay?

    :)

    we are on a roll today! Little Timmy Geitner IS a LoneyBoy isn’t he?

    Yes Al and Tipper Gore do claim to be the model for Love Story although he always reminds me of a card board lock box for some reason.

  76. #76
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:02 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:20 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    No one HAS to write about Miss Hillary’s wideness shall we say.

    I believe she would prefer “overabundance of ampleness”…

    When we speak of her in my part of the cosmos, we simply refer to her as “Her Ampleness.”

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA hahahahahahahaha HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

  77. #77
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:03 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:
    Gag me with a silver spoon.

    Blech.

    HEH!!!

    Coming from a black lady with great hips! :P

  78. #78
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, CW4_KGP said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:
    Gag me with a silver spoon.

    Maybe one suspended on a chain from the neck….a really small one….you know, from the days before Pbo got right wit hissef.

  79. #79
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:32 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:
    Michelle Obama meets the Governator-she could have dressed a bit more modestly I would think. But she is cut.

    Got a big laugh out of that one! Thanks, Arizona!

  80. #80
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:29 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, RetFireman said:There is something that all narcissists have in common. That is the constant need to be told how great and wonderful they are.

    Yes, the golden globs, academy awards, emmys, country music awards, MTV awards, ad nauseum…proves that point nicely.

  81. #81
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:31 pm, happyscrapper said:

    we are on a roll today! Little Timmy Geitner IS a LoneyBoy isn’t he?

    And what about little Rahmie Emanuel in a tutu?

  82. #82
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:33 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Yes Al and Tipper Gore do claim to be the model for Love Story although he always reminds me of a card board lock box for some reason

    All I see when I look at him is a sweaty pig with a huge carbon paw print.

  83. #83
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:34 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Sorry for all the posts in a row! Not cool, I know.

  84. #84
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:37 pm, AlohaGuy said:
  85. #85
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Oh Nooooo – intelligent beautiful black people – we hate that more than anything.

    Our mamas taught us that all black people are inferior but in the real world we know that isn’t true.

  86. #86
    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, RetFireman said:

    Did these idiots really not look at George and Laura? I’m sorry, but I admire their marriage far more than I could EVER admire these two. The Bush’s actually looked at their children as blessings, not as punidhments, and the love seen in their eyes when they looked at each other spoke of a apir that truly, truly cared for each other, not for what the other could do for them.

  87. #87
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, rightisright said:

    The thought of those two anti-American racists together or alone wanna make me puke.

  88. #88
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, Wellsy said:

    You’re absolutely right, ILMC. We’re all profound racists, and you’re much better and enlightened than all of us. /sarc

    I’m glad Barack and Michelle have a good marriage, I really am, it’s a good example for their kids. The point, though, isn’t to celebrate their marriage but to inflate the Obama narrative even more. Because while the press is going ga-ga over the One’s pectorals and cooing approvingly over the Obama’s romance life, the $hit is hitting the fan. And, seriously, if this kind of doe-eyed over-the-top sycophantic romance-novel trash was written about GW and the “sphinx-like” Laura, I wonder how the left would have reacted?

  89. #89
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, RetFireman said:

    Looks like IHMC shows their personal inherent racism by finding anything anyone has said here to have ANYTHING to do with the color of their skin, including adding it’s imitation of how it was taught to think.

    Nice, you racist ba^^ard

  90. #90
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm, Salt said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm, RetFireman said:

    Looks like IHMC shows their personal inherent racism by finding anything anyone has said here to have ANYTHING to do with the color of their skin, including adding it’s imitation of how it was taught to think.

    Nice, you racist ba^^ard

    It’s just more blatant trolling and he seems to be escalating to see just how far he can go before banning.

    It would be nice just to see him gone at this point. He contributes nothing.

  91. #91
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, flmom said:

    It would be nice just to see him gone at this point. He contributes nothing.

    Rather, he takes away from this site, so he does contribute, but it’s more to the negative side of the equation.

  92. #92
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, Misscheryl said:

    It’s just more blatant trolling and he seems to be escalating to see just how far he can go before banning.

    Naw, he’s just frustrated with his own stupidity. Ever notice how troll’s personalities cycle. They become more and more toxic with their ever increasing personal frustration? MistressJustice was a good example of this. She’s was pretty even until a week of commenting would result in a heightened sense of frustration and she’d go postal and sound completely insane every Friday? By Monday, she’d had vented her frustration and sounded almost normal again?

  93. #93
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:56 pm, HeatherRadish said:

    I have a question about Barry introducing Michelle to single motherhood.

    It’s a feminist thing. A lot of married women like to whine about being “single mothers” when their husbands work long hours, golf, or traveling frequently for business, and feminists as well as the Oprah-type media have convinced them that they’re sad, sorry victims of evil patriarchy*. Nevermind they’re still cashing his paychecks, beneficiaries of his life insurance, and telling the kids “wait until your dad gets home!” They’re single mothers!

    Barry campaigning = poor beleagured Michelle left to raise her kids alone (on only his $400k/year, with free room and board). All women are victims, especially women living comfortable upper-class lives.

    I would love to see real single mothers–of the widowed or abandoned variety, not the “choice” kind–start beating the daylight out of everyone who perpetuates this view, but they’re too tired/busy to fight.

    * Interestingly, spouses of deployed soldiers don’t get the “oh, you poor dear, let us help you” treatment. Which crankifies me further, since military deployment, esp. to a combat theater, is nothing like going out of town for a week to a conference.

  94. #94
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, Member-VRWC said:

    Stacy’s wordsmithing (as it were) screams of Afirmative Action hire.

    Just wondering …

    Isn’t it racist to make comments about a black woman’s ample boo-tay?

    Oh, yeah, that’s only when whitey does it.

  95. #95
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:39 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Hear that? That’s the collective eye roll of all men whose wives and girlfriends voted Democrat.

    “Now why can’t you be more like Obama? Ow! What was that for?”

    “I thought you were telling me to give you a head butt. Oh, yeah, the extra weight around the hips don’t bother me none. And lift some weights while you’re at it.”

    Yeah, that’ll fly.

  96. #96
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pm, emjem24 said:

    Schiff and New York magazine are really the lamest of lame. I mean, does this Schiff woman have Obummer and the Mrs. as personal gods at her house or what?

    Schiff and a lot of other liberals have serious boundary issues. Obummer is a freaking politician not some Rock Hudson copy cat. When the sheen wears off we’ll discover (just like we did with Hudson) that it was all a lie.

    Did New York magazine say such glowing things about the Bush marriage? I didn’t know that liberals were so in to “commitment” when most of them not only defend reckless abortion on demand but not taking responsibility for one’s actions.

    Stop putting these made up people on pedestals that regular humans would fall off in a heartbeat.

  97. #97
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:49 pm, emjem24 said:

    sonofdy said:
    BTW sonofdys marriage???

    13 years.

    No fair… my husband and I just celebrated 9 years of marriage. No kids. Do we get the newlywed title? :grin:

  98. #98
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Yeah, that Mao Zedong/Jiang Qing just didn’t have the “fairy tale” aspect of BHO and MO…

    But, at least we don’t have Algore sticking his tongue down Tipper’s throat!

  99. #99
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:15 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Ilovemycountry

    Please slither back under your rock and stay there.

    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, WarEagle82 said:
    Yeah, that Mao Zedong/Jiang Qing just didn’t have the “fairy tale” aspect of BHO and MO…

    But, at least we don’t have Algore sticking his tongue down Tipper’s throat!

    Good grief! I was able to keep my lunch down after reading MM’s blog. But that image of the Gore’s you conjured up was too much for me…Thanks a lot.

  100. #100
    On March 16th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Sorry, there happyscrapper. I forgot some people may on “left coast time” when I made my post. There are just some images we can all do without around lunch time.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


MSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney

December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Sorry we much

Did Newt Gingrich Say the Worst Thing Any Presidential Candidate Has Ever Said?

November 21, 2011 01:02 PM by Doug Powers

159 Comments

“It’s absolutely disgusting”

Nina Totenberg: No Evidence of Anything Political About Solyndra

November 19, 2011 04:21 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

None at all

Media Seminar: How to Silence an MSNBC Panel 101

November 16, 2011 11:45 AM by Doug Powers

205 Comments

Just say “Solyndra”

‘Smug Shot’ from the GOP Debate

November 14, 2011 02:01 PM by Doug Powers

143 Comments

CNN’s John King Defends Joe Biden’s Honor; Demands Satisfaction

October 27, 2011 03:46 PM by Doug Powers

68 Comments

Unethical?


Categories: Media Bias

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook