L.A. Times refused to report 15k Fullterton anti-tax protest, but features A.N.S.W.E.R.’s anti-AIG/anti-war events before they happen

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 16, 2009 02:07 PM

This is why Old Media is dying. The Los Angeles Times today recycles press releases from left-wing A.N.S.W.E.R. announcing a protest of AIG this afternoon and an anti-war rally next weekend. The paper has no problem serving as advance publicity team for radical Left groups:

Demonstrators plan to rally outside the AIG building today in downtown Los Angeles to protest the giant insurer’s decision to pay $165 million in bonuses to key employees. American International Group Inc. recently received the first part of $180 billion in federal bailout funds.

“We’re going to be down there with whoever we can get,” said Ian Thompson of the Los Angeles chapter of the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (A.N.S.W.E.R.) coalition. “We’re going to be expressing anger and outrage about the new bonuses that were announced, that will be given to the very same folks who helped cause the financial meltdown.”

The protest is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. near the intersection of 8th and Figueroa streets. The group also will help lead an anti-war protest Saturday at noon to mark the sixth anniversary of the war in Iraq. A march is set to start near Hollywood Boulevard and Vine Street and continue to Hollywood Boulevard and Highland Avenue.

Not a single body has shown up for these events yet. But it’s newsworthy to the LA Times.

On the other hand, if 15,000 people turn out to lambaste tax-and-spend politicians in both parties in Fullerton, CA, it’s not news.

It’s a “stunt.”

What media bias? Yeah, that media bias.

Ready for pushback? Eric Odom is organizing.

You can also leave comments at the L.A.Times/A.N.S.W.E.R. publicity headquarters here.

Posted in: Tea Party

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Hypocrite much L.A. Obama Times? You wouldn’t cover the Fullerton anti tax protests that draw 15,000, but have no problem covering AIG protests today | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  2. 15,000 People Protest at California Tea Party - LA Times Refuses to Cover the Story « The IUSB Vision Weblog
  3. L.A. Times Tea Party Eye Chart
  4. LA Times Covers Tea Party! « American Glob
  5. What Media bias? - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source!
  6. Card Check is Tyranny! And also a war against the free market and specifically Wal-Mart « Jim Blazsik
  7. The Saloon dot net
  8. Moonbattery and Malkin with Tea Party Updates :: Daily Uprising
  9. L.A. Times refused to report 15k Fullterton anti-tax protest, but features A.N.S.W.E.R.’s anti-AIG/anti-war events before they happen

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #650038
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, sonofdy said:

    You mean the MSM is :shock: BIASED????

    Say it ain’t so Michelle…

  2. #650043
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Khyris said:

    Indefensible

  3. #650045
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Hey L.A. Times, the Labrea tar pits await!

  4. #650046
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    LA Times… ACORN edition.

  5. #650050
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, RedDog said:

    Neo-Marxist shock troops doing their thing. Speaking truth to power as usual. Sure.

  6. #650051
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:17 pm, cpodug said:

    “If I close my eyes hard enough, I can’t see it. Therefore, it didn’t happen.”

  7. #650059
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I wonder if China is watching. They’re been working on how to topple the US. Obama and the liberal media are doing it for them.

  8. #650061
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    They’ve been…

  9. #650065
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, lgm said:

    This is why Old Media is dying.

    The MSM is dying because it’s losing its advertising base, which mostly was classifieds, because of things like craigslist and ebay. Readers can and do get the content free on the web.

    The MSM doesn’t cover Tea Parties because they’re puny. The ones that draw more than a dozen people, like the one in Cincinnati, do get reported.

    Besides, the Tea Parties are explicitly unpatriotic — refusing to pay taxes and suggesting violent overthrow of the government. It’s like demanding the press cover KKK rallies (which probably draw more people on average).

  10. #650067
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:25 pm, political junkie said:

    They also managed to do a hit piece on conservative radio, John and Ken in general. Classic stuff.

  11. #650072
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The LA Times: More Tools than Home Depot ™

  12. #650077
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Khyris said:
    Indefensible

    I do not think he knows what that word means!

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, lgm said:

    Nothing – move along.

  13. #650080
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The MSM is dying because it’s losing its advertising base, which mostly was classifieds

    …except for all those pages and pages and pages of display ads…which they are losing because people don’t read the propoganda sheets anymore.

  14. #650083
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:31 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    The MSM doesn’t cover Tea Parties because they’re puny.

    Is there anything punier than an event that hasn’t happened?

  15. #650084
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:32 pm, Khyris said:

    Besides, the Tea Parties are explicitly unpatriotic — refusing to pay taxes and suggesting violent overthrow of the government.

    I think you’ll find the opposite is true… these are the people who DO pay their taxes, therein lies the complaint… if these people were refusing to pay legally owed taxes, they wouldn’t have anything to complain about. And they are advocating legal political actions (no on 1A) to reform the system…

    Yes, by all means keep marginalizing common people with the “RAAAAACIIIIISTS” type comments. See how long they put up with it. Libs are shooting themselves in the foot doing everything they can to ensure that CA votes Red come 2010.

  16. #650085
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Yeah, well don’t liberals here tell us we’re just a bunch of paranoid losers for protesting their beloved Obama?

    The media is merely giving them what they want.

    Of course this, and comments like lgm’s, smack of a child sticking his fingers in his ears, yelling, “I CAN’T HEAR YOU!” at full throat in an attempt to deny the ever-shifting reality.

  17. #650086
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    lgm said:

    And then everything else you said made even less sense.

  18. #650087
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:33 pm, sonofdy said:

    The MSM doesn’t cover Tea Parties because they’re puny.

    At first they were puny. A few dozen. Now a few weeks later, some are as big as 15,000. In 6 months?????

    LGM denial is an ugly thing.

  19. #650088
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, twiggman said:

    lgm 15,000 people is puny…you are an IDIOT…

  20. #650090
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:34 pm, granite said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:29 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Nothing – move along.

    Exactly.

    It’s just Muffy leading a cheer:

    Two bits
    Four bits
    Six bits
    A dollar

    Ev’ryone for ‘Bama
    Stand up and holler

    Yay-yay-yay…in a flurry of pom-poms….

  21. #650092
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, txvet2 said:

    The MSM is dying because it’s losing its advertising base, which mostly was classifieds

    The advertising base is disappearing because it’s driven by circulation, which is falling through the floor.

    I have to admit, for a long time you had me fooled with this over-the-top parody of a street liberal, but I’m afraid you’ve jumped the shark once too often. No lib could be this stupid. Well, hardly any.

  22. #650094
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm#Graphic

    LGM, look at the direction the lines are going.

    Not good for your messiah.

  23. #650095
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Khyris said:
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Khyris said:
    Indefensible

    I do not think he knows what that word means!

    You don’t think who knows what that word means? lgm?

  24. #650096
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, d1carter said:

    And they still don’t understand why they are going out of business….!

  25. #650099
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, granite said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, d1carter said:

    And they still don’t understand why they are going out of business….!

    Agreed.

    And the bad news is…?

  26. #650100
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, sonofdy said:

    And they still don’t understand why they are going out of business….!

    Sure they do, its bushes fault.

  27. #650107
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Besides, the Tea Parties are explicitly unpatriotic — refusing to pay taxes and suggesting violent overthrow of the government.

    Hysterical. Absolutely hysterical.

    Read up on your history. This country was founded by people doing the exact same thing.

    And how many liberals threatened not to pay taxes because of Bush and “his” war? Lots.

    Oh, but they were “unpatriotic”, too, right? Guess lgm would have fought with the Red Coats back in 1776…

    By the way, what about this part of the First Amendment is unclear to you:

    Congress shall make no law respecting …the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    This is the classic First Amendment being played out.

    Nothing that happens here isn’t Obama’s fault. If he (aided by the media) didn’t lie about being the “moderate” then come out and be nothing short of a socialist and attempt to enact policies reflecting that, then people wouldn’t be engaging in protest and backlash.

    I said it before and I’ll say it again: liberals are just sore that The One is being criticized, since they live in a fantasy world where he’s the second coming and above all question and reproach.

    Reality bites, don’t it?

  28. #650109
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:42 pm, On-my-soap-box said:
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, Khyris said:
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:11 pm, Khyris said:

    Indefensible

    I do not think he knows what that word means!

    You don’t think who knows what that word means? lgm?

    Just a line from a great movie. The actual word is:

    Inconceivable!

    Close enough. Come to think of it, both words describe lgm well.

  29. #650112
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, Khyris said:

    Inconceivable!

    I do not think that word means what you think it means…

  30. #650116
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Great post – one fix:

    Reality lgm bites

  31. #650117
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:46 pm, Cosmo said:

    pj (#10) Off-topic, but don’t feel too sorry for John and Ken. They’re CINOs at best, regardless of any good they’ve done (Westerberg, Scott Peterson, etc.)

    My lot is cast with John Ziegler on this issue.

    The LA Times is still not even good enough for birdcage liner, though.

  32. #650122
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:50 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:44 pm, Khyris said:
    Inconceivable!
    I do not think that word means what you think it means…

    ROFL – I blew it I know. Need sleep!

  33. #650128
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, lgm said:

    Most people read news on the web for free. Most of this news was gathered by MSM reporters and comes from MSM outlets like NYTimes.com. Most of the stories on MM are sourced to the MSM, including this one. Classified ad revenue is down because of craigslist.

    Refusing to pay taxes is like refusing the draft. You have a right to stand up and say it, but it isn’t good for the country.

    Your punk sized tea parties will be dwarfed by real rallies by real Americans looking out for the American worker.

  34. #650129
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, CrazyFool said:

    This is nothing new. The Seattle Tea Party hardly was mentioned in the local media. One station mentioned it beforehand in a sort-of ‘lets go see how many show up…’ kind of way….

    As I recall, soon after the Iraq invasion there was a protest in Iraq – organized and held by Iraqi’s in several cities. Not for the US but more against terrorism. Reports were that there were 100K to 3M (as in MILLION) Iraqi’s present.

    The MSM didn’t even mention it. Yet if some self-described spokesman for AL-Q farts the MSM is all over it like cats on cream.

  35. #650134
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:55 pm, Flyoverman said:

    As the LA Times, NY Times, and Washington Post sink quietly into the abyss never to return.

    Adios.

  36. #650139
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:57 pm, Salt said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, lgm said:

    LOL. Another TPM link? Must be a lazy day for you, eh?

    Are you here to tell us that you support the EFCA?

  37. #650140
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:57 pm, emjem24 said:

    “We’re going to be down there with whoever we can get,” said Ian Thompson of the Los Angeles chapter of the Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (A.N.S.W.E.R.) coalition. “We’re going to be expressing anger and outrage about the new bonuses that were announced, that will be given to the very same folks who helped cause the financial meltdown.”

    So this bunch of uninformed liberal street protesters have a problem with contracts and the rule of law? While AIG is at fault for their lousy investment vehicles and short-term money making devices while putting too much faith in an overly inflated housing market (the 7th in American history), they made a contract with their employees and will be sued if they do not fulfill the terms of that contract.

    It’s curious that the LA Times is hyping up this group in particular. They’re casting a light on a group who’s protesting a war (the Iraq War) that Obummer still supports. This group is protesting a private business (okay not so private since the American taxpayers own 80% of it now) that has nothing to do with their specific mission statement. Finally, what does war and capitalism have to do with one another?

    Or could it be that this is ANSWER’s version of War on Capitalism? Can’t wait for the geers of Obummer Lied, Capitalism Died. Film at 11:00.

  38. #650142
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    Sorry lgm-
    The comparison of the Tea Parties to the KKK is weak at best.

    The better analogy would be ACORN/SPLC/NAACP/Neo-Nazis/New Black Panther Party/La Raza to the KKK. Their methods are very simuliar in creating racial hatred and discord-both openly (smear by association) and covertly (refuse to hire people based on white male sounding names).

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

  39. #650143
    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:59 pm, Special K said:

    Wonder how much a full page ad in the LA Times cost?

  40. #650145
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:00 pm, emjem24 said:

    sonofdy said:

    LGM denial is an ugly thing.

    More specifically, reality for LGM is an ugly thing.

    Liberal intelligence is really an oxymoron. :)

  41. #650150
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, sonofdy said:

    LGM is sounding more and more nervous.

    I wonder why…

    http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm#Graphic

  42. #650152
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, RetFireman said:

    The Times moderates it’s comments. If anyone thinks they are going to allow any comment that speaks poorly of that fishwrap, they are only fooling themselves. If my comment gets posted, I might have to call an ambulance to take me to the ED for a heart attack.

  43. #650156
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:06 pm, Hangfire said:

    lgm reminds me of good old Dr. Smith on the otherwise forgetable 60’s TV show Lost in Space.

    He was stuck on the same planet as the others, but did everything in his power to sabotage their existence.

  44. #650157
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:07 pm, sonofdy said:

    In real life dr smith would have been executed or expelled very quickly.

  45. #650160
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:09 pm, Hangfire said:

    Or elected.

  46. #650163
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:10 pm, RetFireman said:

    LGM, never letting an opportunity to demonstrate his unbelievable stupidity and ignorance, once again spews forth his normal blather.

    I guess he thinks all those “peace” rallies were pro-American, peaceful and never had anything said during them concerning President Bush and how long he should remain in office.

    Never mind all the groups backed by SOcialist and Communist organizations. Never mind all the signs and speakers who called for the assasination of President Bush, never mind all the riots and damage to both public and private property or the number of people injured by those “peaceful, nonviolent” protesters.

    Like I have asked before, I wonder what the air is like on his planet. Obviously it is very dense, because to read his drivel, you see that he is showing all the classic signs of hypoxia.

    Geez what an idiot. See folks…this is what happens when you can’t handle pixie sticks.

  47. #650164
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, emjem24 said:

    Your punk sized tea parties will be dwarfed by real rallies by real Americans looking out for the American worker.

    Lgm, if you think that rallies run by unions is meant to “look out for the American worker” you’re even crazier than your post implies. These rallies and this bailout are to insure that unions will never enjoy the inevitable demise that all anochronistic social/labor movements eventually see happen.

    Most Americans no longer belong to unions. Only about 12% of the American workforce now can claim that. Many of the labor movement’s contributions to labor reform have become law. Why do we need fat cat labor unions and bosses to intimidate businesses and employees?

    Labor unions had their heyday and now it’s time to move on. Liberals and labor tycoons use unions to stunt innovation and growth as well as to financially help themselves. They certainly only look out for themselves… not the American worker.

  48. #650166
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, Cosmo said:

    lgm: rallies born out of the grassroots vs. rallies populated by union members who are coerced, strong-armed or straight-up threatened with violence for not attending are two completely different things.

    Of course, since most union members who I’ve had the (dis)pleasure of working alongside are some of the laziest people I know, it doesn’t surprise me in the least that they would jump at the chance to come out from behind their “shame on ” banner and attend a rally where they get to stretch their legs and their larynx.

    The SEIU…haven for lazy bed-changers and toilet scrubbers. What a crock.

  49. #650167
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:11 pm, cpodug said:

    lgm: a thought for you. There are an awful lot of people around the country, and here on this website, who are saying loudly and clearly, “I am John Galt.” I suggest you go and read Atlas Shrugged before you start dumping on “puny” demonstrations. Then do something strange for you – THINK about it and what it means.

    Of course, for the rest of you, I realize you think I am expecting some kind of a miracle here. Sorry. I’m not. lgm is a hopelessly lost cause.

  50. #650169
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:15 pm, RetFireman said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm, sonofdy said:

    LGM is sounding more and more nervous.

    I wonder why…

    http://www.pollingreport.com/obama_job.htm#Graphic

    Lookie there…Der Fuhrer is making even more history. He is rapidly becoming less popular than any other President at the same point in their Presidency.

    He already has a higher disapproval rating than Bush did at this point…hats off to him.

    I can’t wait to hear all the excuses and apologies for him once he has approval ratings at or below Bush’s…and without a war to blame it on, and way WAY sooner.

    “Hope and Change”…hee hee hee hee

  51. #650176
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:22 pm, rplatt said:

    Disgusting, but the LA Times is a far left propaganda rag and they’re behaving as expected.

  52. #650178
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pm, cabrerski said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, lgm said: The MSM is dying because it’s losing its advertising base

    On this part, lgm, you are right. But advertising will always chase the audience. This is why we have subcription numbers and ratings in TV/radio. Many of the old school (such as myself) love to read the news regardless of its source unless the source proves over and over again that it is biased. By not revealing all the story to allow the reader/listener to draw their own conclusions, many such as myself will just terminate our subscriptions or never tune in the offending stations. Thus, lose your audience, lose your advertising.

    This is a reason (but not the only reason) why newspapers are failing.

  53. #650179
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    it doesn’t surprise me in the least that they would jump at the chance to come out from behind their “shame on ” banner and attend a rally where they get to stretch their legs and their larynx.

    No kidding, here in utah they hire illegals to hold the signs for them. That sounds like a joke but I am dead serious.

  54. #650180
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, sonofdy said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, lgm said: The MSM is dying because it’s losing its advertising base

    Blaming the net would make more sense if they weren’t also on the net. Go ahead and look them up on line. All of them are there.

  55. #650182
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, jwm said:

    lgm said “Your punk sized tea parties will be dwarfed by real rallies by real Americans looking out for the American worker.”

    I’m a real American worker living in the Bay Area and attended some of those “real rallies” you are alluding to and can state with conviction that there were very few “workers” attending those rallies. The reason being, real workers can’t attend rallies held at 9 in the morning on a weekend, but students and professional protesters can.

  56. #650201
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:52 pm, lgm said:

    …nothing even remotely close to reality.

  57. #650213
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, jwm said:

    Big oops on my part. I meant to write during the week and not the weekend. Still, wouldn’t most real workers want to spend their weekends at the bbq?

  58. #650219
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:53 pm, RetFireman said:

    Your punk sized tea parties will be dwarfed by real rallies by real Americans looking out for the American worker.

    Awe look…he even is trying to appear informed. However, to use that article as his evidence that “Real” Americans are those that run Unions and that the Union Executive boards are looking out for anything other than themselves…wow…that shows an ignorance to stun the gods.

    And to use TPM and his “unbiased”, “non-partisan”, source of where he gets his information…OMG…my sides are KILLING me.

    This guy is really a stand-up comedian somewhere, isn’t he? A failed one, for sure, but a stand-up none-the-less. Is he just trying out new material here? Come on…come clean. What’s the gag?

  59. #650223
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, lgm said:

    I figured you guys would think Republican demonstrators heroes and have other choice words for the much more numerous Democratic demonstrators.

    But why are you pretending Obama is unpopular on the basis of polls that show his approval in the sixties and disapproval in the thirties, and this despite massive job losses and the full throated blast from the entire right wing noise machine.

  60. #650228
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, cpodug said:

    jwm – if you were a teacher, you could take your entire class to the demonstration for extra credit – sort of like lgm

  61. #650231
    On March 16th, 2009 at 3:59 pm, RetFireman said:

    Why are you pretending that he is not losing points rapidly, when his numbers have been in steady decline since talking the oath? Where can you point to another Presidency that has had similar numbers within the first 60 days of their Presidency?

    That’s OK..you can admit to being nervous. We all know you are, because you are actually doing nothing here but making excuses for him rather than just your standard inane comments.

    Dance little monkey, dance.

  62. #650233
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:02 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    But why are you pretending Obama is unpopular on the basis of polls that show his approval in the sixties and disapproval in the thirties, and this despite massive job losses and the full throated blast from the entire right wing noise machine.

    What is the political breakdown of the people polled?

    Polls are biased.

    By the way, I wouldn’t boast about polling percentages in the 60s. On most grading scales, that’s D territory, if not full-blown F.

  63. #650236
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, sonofdy said:

    But why are you pretending Obama is unpopular on the basis of polls that show his approval in the sixties and disapproval in the thirties,

    Didn’t look at the chart did you LGM??? I know it is painfull but a 21 point increase in the negatives and 7-8 point decrease in the positives in 2 months????

    Thats historicaly bad.

    much more numerous Democratic demonstrators

    These are not GOP rallies (is that the talking point now?) and they are just beginning.

    Its going to get much worse. Plug your ears and close your eyes all you want, but it is coming. I pity you.

  64. #650242
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:07 pm, jwm said:

    lgm nice red herring. My point was in response to you “real american workers” line. Tell you what, come out to San Francisco and we’ll watch a protest together so you can point out the real american workers for me. It’ll be worth a vacation day to see and hear this.

  65. #650248
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, RetFireman said:

    And allow me to point out the difference between Bush and Der Fuhrer:

    Sure, people were out there whining and crying about the lie they were attempting to sell to everyone about how they were all “Disenfranchised” and how Bush allegedly stole the election etc., etc.,

    But no one was saying ANYTHING about his policies, his plans etc. There was no one protesting what he was doing to the country or how he was tripling the spending of his predecessor’s eight years in office, in one month. No, it was merely them carrying on and attempting to have a lie begun by their candidate’s inability to admit defeat and attempt at throwing out the Constitution.

    See, here, we have a rapidly growing portion of the country who are finally waking up to the horrible mistake they made by falling for what the MSM fed them and the lies they were told. They are waking up to the fact that they sold their country out for a stupid slogan that no one bothered to ask what it meant.

    And that is not counting all the people who never were fooled to begin with.

    They are upset that the people entrusted with the safety and security of this nation have sold us out. They are upset with the fact that the person they voted for has done more to destroy this country in one month than the Soviet Union tried to do in 60 years.

    If these things are that difficult for you to understand, then maybe you should just stick to the comic book blogs and keep your arguments geared towards why Aquaman is still considered to be a superhero.

    And let the adults talk.

  66. #650252
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:11 pm, James Felix said:

    Sweet fancy Moses this guy is a moron.

    The MSM doesn’t cover Tea Parties because they’re puny. The ones that draw more than a dozen people, like the one in Cincinnati, do get reported.

    You can’t get more puny than -zero- attendees, which is what the rally they did report on has. That’s the whole point.

    Besides, the Tea Parties are explicitly unpatriotic — refusing to pay taxes and suggesting violent overthrow of the government.

    It’s not a march of people refusing to pay their taxes (if you want to see such a line just watch the front door of the White House). It’s people saying that our tax policy is unfair and the money collected is being spent wastefully. It is, in other words, the exact sort of thing the First Amendment refers to when it says people can seek redress from the government.

    And unlike the signs your moronic and assinine idealogical bretheren carry, no one is advocating overthrow of the government. Which, by the way, if they were doing so should make it more newsworthy, not less.

    It’s like demanding the press cover KKK rallies (which probably draw more people on average).

    We do demand press coverage of KKK rallies. As for such rallies drawing more people I tend to doubt it but I’ll take your word for it. As a supporter of the only party that has an actual klansman in congress I guess you’d know better than I would.

  67. #650255
    On March 16th, 2009 at 4:13 pm, RetFireman said:

    They are “Real American Workers”. Since they are professional protesters, and since they are paid for their services, that means they are working.

    See…Der Fuhrer rides again…putting people to work, right before our eyes.

  68. #650347
    On March 16th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:35 pm, txvet2 said:
    No lib could be this stupid.

    Don’t sell lgm and the rest of them short.

    Hope is not a plan; not all change is good. The resistance is here; the resistance is now. RESIST!!!!

    ECS

  69. #650364
    On March 16th, 2009 at 5:25 pm, Ron said:

    Same LATimes gloating over the folding of a couple of local (state) conservative talk radio shows. Like they’re making money hand over fist, right? Then they imply that nobody’s really checking Rush Limbaugh’s ratings very closely to see if he really has all those listeners. Riiight. Well, we know they aren’t buying copies of the Slimes, that’s for sure.

  70. #650403
    On March 16th, 2009 at 6:13 pm, RogerCfromSD said:

    Once again, lgm has lived down to my expectations of him.

    What an absolute fool.

  71. #650406
    On March 16th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, John Deaux said:

    On March 16th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, lgm said:

    The MSM doesn’t cover Tea Parties because they’re puny. The ones that draw more than a dozen people, like the one in Cincinnati, do get reported.

    Then why didn’t the rally of 15,000 people get covered by the L.A. Times?

    Did you even read the topic before commenting?

    I swear if you were any dumber, we’d have to water you.

  72. #650407
    On March 16th, 2009 at 6:18 pm, CrazyFool said:

    Real American workers simply don’t have time to attend a protest at 9AM on a weekday (someone pointed this out earlier).

    Professional Protesters, Students, and those on the public teat can.

    And yes, there are professional protesters – what do you think that $2B for Acron is for?

  73. #650411
    On March 16th, 2009 at 6:19 pm, Trollman said:

    lgm said:

    Besides, the Tea Parties are explicitly unpatriotic — refusing to pay taxes and suggesting violent overthrow of the government.

    So it’s OK to question people’s patriotism now? Kewl!

    Oh, and you are historically ignorant. From wikipedia concerning the first tea party:

    “The incident, which took place on December 16, 1773, was a major catalyst of the American Revolution and remains an iconic event of American history.”

    Tea parties are the epitome of American patriotism.

  74. #650455
    On March 16th, 2009 at 7:42 pm, michellemalkinfanclub said:

    We are patiently anticipating the day when the unemployed members of the dinosaur media utter that famous phrase “would you like fries with that?”

  75. #650501
    On March 16th, 2009 at 9:17 pm, cicerokid said:

    Excuse me if this has already been posted but i’m between getting mad and just shaking my head in disgust…

    8,500 earmarks worth billions, ok.

    bonuses worth 350 million, not ok.

    naaaa, this is not a distraction, is it?

  76. #650541
    On March 16th, 2009 at 10:18 pm, RetFireman said:

    If Obama’s Government does not like what these corporations were planning on doing with the money, he should not have given it to them.

    When you go in for a loan, or when someone gives you money, is it really that person’s or the bank’s business what you do with the money?

    Are we really supposed to believe that Obama was taken totally by surprise?

    Well, actually when you consider he has never held a real job, let alone managed or run a company of any sort, yeah…it is more than likely that he really had no clue as to what was going to happen.

    He has never run a business, so the voters gave him the keys to the largest business in the world, and now they are all shacked that he has no idea how to run it. And Der Fuhrer has the gaul to talk about how these other corporations are running their business? Tis the Liberal way.

  77. #650576
    On March 16th, 2009 at 11:01 pm, Blackstone said:

    Note the missing L-word from the article’s descriptions of A.N.S.W.E.R.

  78. #650711
    On March 17th, 2009 at 8:57 am, secondsight said:

    AIG bonuses = $165M red herring.

    Which distract you from seeing trillion deficit spending.

    Notice that none, NONE, are railing against the foundational enablers of the current credit crisis: the rating agencies that slapped AAA grades on real sludge. Why they are not being burnt at the stake at politico’s evening campfires every day is simply amazing. NO ONE, not even the blogosphere, is going after them.

  79. #650755
    On March 17th, 2009 at 10:01 am, dan708 said:

    I am SO looking forward to the ‘10 midterms. Just think – in ‘94 the press didn’t see the Republican Revolution coming. Will history repeat? It all depends on whether the moderates get mad enough.

  80. #651082
    On March 17th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    Boohoo – you people are such victims.

    You folks remind me of Al Sharpton.

  81. #651699
    On March 17th, 2009 at 6:28 pm, flaming_o said:

    On March 17th, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    You folks remind me of Al Sharpton.

    Thank you, Jeremiah Wright.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Protesting Pelosicare in her own backyard

November 16, 2009 10:37 AM by Michelle Malkin

21 Comments | 1 Trackback

Newt for 2012? No, thanks.

October 26, 2009 09:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

135 Comments | 7 Trackbacks

Dallas Tea Party activists push back against Gingrich’s straw men

October 23, 2009 02:33 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Call them out.

Protesting the media culture of corruption

October 19, 2009 01:13 PM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Plus: Reuters punked. And a Balloon-Boy/media conspiracy?

A message from NY-23 conservative candidate Doug Hoffman

October 17, 2009 09:54 AM by Doug Hoffman

258 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

“It’s time for conservatives to show the Republican establishment who’s in charge.”

Dear RNC: What part of “NO” don’t you understand?

October 16, 2009 02:50 PM by Michelle Malkin

103 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

What up?!

Tea Party for Obama: A San Francisco treat

October 16, 2009 11:56 AM by Michelle Malkin

55 Comments | 5 Trackbacks


Categories: Tea Party



Nice Deb

» O
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook