<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John McCain&#8217;s AIG bailout revisionism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook123</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-1212279</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-1212279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: facebook123</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-1212264</link>
		<dc:creator>facebook123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-1212264</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;You should check this out...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You should check this out&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...] Wonderful story, reckoned we could combine a few unrelated data, nevertheless really worth taking a look, whoa did one learn about Mid East has got more problerms as well [...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Big Government Huckster John McCain&#8217;s bitter, clingy $21 million primary fight</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-976239</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Big Government Huckster John McCain&#8217;s bitter, clingy $21 million primary fight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-976239</guid>
		<description>[...] $85 billion AIG bailout; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] $85 billion AIG bailout; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Attention, GOP: John McCain is the problem</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-894224</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Attention, GOP: John McCain is the problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-894224</guid>
		<description>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McCain a &#8216;RINO&#8217;&#8230;READ and Decide for yourself at Desert Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-890007</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain a &#8216;RINO&#8217;&#8230;READ and Decide for yourself at Desert Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-890007</guid>
		<description>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Malkin &#187; Dick Armey whitewashes John McCain&#8217;s fiscal irresponsibility record</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-888716</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Malkin &#187; Dick Armey whitewashes John McCain&#8217;s fiscal irresponsibility record</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-888716</guid>
		<description>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *The first $85 billion AIG bailout. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Everything That Stands, The End</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-845921</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Everything That Stands, The End</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-845921</guid>
		<description>[...] True, all true. But what about &#8220;we the people?&#8221; Aren&#8217;t we the one&#8217;s who voted for &#8220;compassionate progressive conservatism,&#8221; and stumped for &#8220;Wilsonian&#8221; McCain? Seriously. McCain drastically infringed our right of free speech, and &#8220;suspended&#8221; his campaign to pass TARP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] True, all true. But what about &#8220;we the people?&#8221; Aren&#8217;t we the one&#8217;s who voted for &#8220;compassionate progressive conservatism,&#8221; and stumped for &#8220;Wilsonian&#8221; McCain? Seriously. McCain drastically infringed our right of free speech, and &#8220;suspended&#8221; his campaign to pass TARP. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop the huge Bonuses For AIG Employees &#124; The Experts In Real Estate And Mortgages</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-655450</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop the huge Bonuses For AIG Employees &#124; The Experts In Real Estate And Mortgages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-655450</guid>
		<description>[...] John McCain&#8217;s AIG bailout revisionism (michellemalkin.com)    addthis_url = &#039;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theexpertsinrealestate.com%2F2009%2F03%2F17%2Fstop-the-huge-bonuses-for-aig-employees%2F&#039;; addthis_title = &#039;Stop+the+huge+Bonuses+For+AIG+Employees&#039;; addthis_pub = &#039;&#039;; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John McCain&#8217;s AIG bailout revisionism (michellemalkin.com)    addthis_url = &#8216;http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theexpertsinrealestate.com%2F2009%2F03%2F17%2Fstop-the-huge-bonuses-for-aig-employees%2F&#8217;; addthis_title = &#8216;Stop+the+huge+Bonuses+For+AIG+Employees&#8217;; addthis_pub = &#8221;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AIG Bonuses: Paulson, Geithner and the Money Laundering Smoke Screen &#124; The Great Illuminator</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-652097</link>
		<dc:creator>AIG Bonuses: Paulson, Geithner and the Money Laundering Smoke Screen &#124; The Great Illuminator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-652097</guid>
		<description>[...] the charge was the largest recipient getting $281,400. Let&#8217;s also not forget that Republican John McCain was also the fourth largest recipient of AIG contributions. (From Michelle) Fox Business reporter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the charge was the largest recipient getting $281,400. Let&#8217;s also not forget that Republican John McCain was also the fourth largest recipient of AIG contributions. (From Michelle) Fox Business reporter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ITookTheRedPill</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651842</link>
		<dc:creator>ITookTheRedPill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 02:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651842</guid>
		<description>On March 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, RTater said: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;John McCain - the best argument against open primaries.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Exactly.  

You know why the Democrats initially said their Michigan and Florida primaries would not count?  

Because they wanted Democrats to vote in the Republican primary!

That helped McCain win Florida, which was very important for him and the Democratic Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm, RTater said: </p>
<blockquote><p>John McCain &#8211; the best argument against open primaries.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly.  </p>
<p>You know why the Democrats initially said their Michigan and Florida primaries would not count?  </p>
<p>Because they wanted Democrats to vote in the Republican primary!</p>
<p>That helped McCain win Florida, which was very important for him and the Democratic Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651687</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651687</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On March 17th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, lgm said:

Salt(#79): You can huff and puff until dawn, 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Cute emotional argument, but it doesn&#039;t change the fact that you made up a claim, I asked you for a source, and you claim that my lack of proving you wrong means you&#039;re right. 


&lt;blockquote&gt;
...but you don’t have a name. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ad Naseum doesn&#039;t make you any more accurate.

The legislature is not made up entirely of Democrats, nor do all Governors have a (D) after their name.  This by itself would disprove your theory that their constituents disapprove of them more than approve.


&lt;blockquote&gt;
There isn’t a Republican more popular than Pelosi or Reid or even Barney Frank, let alone Obama. Can you name a Republican more popular than McCain? I don’t think so.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nancy and Harry popular?  I suppose it depends on which definition of popularity you are using.  It sounds more like notoriety or familiarity.  I&#039;ll grant you that a lot of people know who Nancy Pelosi is, but that doesn&#039;t necessarily imply she&#039;s popular.


&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Speaker&#039;s unfavorable rating jumped to 43 percent in a Diageo/Hotline poll released March 5, up from 34 percent at the end of January. And, for the first time this year, &lt;strong&gt;Daily Kos&lt;/strong&gt;/Research 2000 polling shows Pelosi&#039;s disapproval rating eclipsing her approval rating, 38-42, in a poll conducted last week.

Reid has been sliding in public opinion polls as well. His favorable/unfavorable split was 18-27 in the March 5 Diageo/Hotline poll, down from an 18-20 split in the Jan. 28 poll. His 33-46 favorable/unfavorable split in a recent Daily Kos/Research 2000 -- a 13-point differential -- is his lowest of 2009 in that poll.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/pn_20090316_4768.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So, where congressional approval has upticked in some polls, it appears that the leadership has not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On March 17th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, lgm said:</p>
<p>Salt(#79): You can huff and puff until dawn,
</p></blockquote>
<p>Cute emotional argument, but it doesn&#8217;t change the fact that you made up a claim, I asked you for a source, and you claim that my lack of proving you wrong means you&#8217;re right. </p>
<blockquote><p>
&#8230;but you don’t have a name.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Ad Naseum doesn&#8217;t make you any more accurate.</p>
<p>The legislature is not made up entirely of Democrats, nor do all Governors have a (D) after their name.  This by itself would disprove your theory that their constituents disapprove of them more than approve.</p>
<blockquote><p>
There isn’t a Republican more popular than Pelosi or Reid or even Barney Frank, let alone Obama. Can you name a Republican more popular than McCain? I don’t think so.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Nancy and Harry popular?  I suppose it depends on which definition of popularity you are using.  It sounds more like notoriety or familiarity.  I&#8217;ll grant you that a lot of people know who Nancy Pelosi is, but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily imply she&#8217;s popular.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Speaker&#8217;s unfavorable rating jumped to 43 percent in a Diageo/Hotline poll released March 5, up from 34 percent at the end of January. And, for the first time this year, <strong>Daily Kos</strong>/Research 2000 polling shows Pelosi&#8217;s disapproval rating eclipsing her approval rating, 38-42, in a poll conducted last week.</p>
<p>Reid has been sliding in public opinion polls as well. His favorable/unfavorable split was 18-27 in the March 5 Diageo/Hotline poll, down from an 18-20 split in the Jan. 28 poll. His 33-46 favorable/unfavorable split in a recent Daily Kos/Research 2000 &#8212; a 13-point differential &#8212; is his lowest of 2009 in that poll.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/pn_20090316_4768.php" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p></blockquote>
<p>So, where congressional approval has upticked in some polls, it appears that the leadership has not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tarpon</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651686</link>
		<dc:creator>tarpon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651686</guid>
		<description>Who cares ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651645</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651645</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Salt&lt;/strong&gt;(#79): You can huff and puff until dawn, but you don&#039;t have a name.  There isn&#039;t a Republican more popular than Pelosi or Reid or even Barney Frank, let alone Obama.  Can you name a Republican more popular than McCain?  I don&#039;t think so.  

Republicans in Congress are headed for single digits, like rats following Rush Limbaugh out of town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Salt</strong>(#79): You can huff and puff until dawn, but you don&#8217;t have a name.  There isn&#8217;t a Republican more popular than Pelosi or Reid or even Barney Frank, let alone Obama.  Can you name a Republican more popular than McCain?  I don&#8217;t think so.  </p>
<p>Republicans in Congress are headed for single digits, like rats following Rush Limbaugh out of town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651625</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651625</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 17th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

Time for John to retire. Play some gold, soak up the Arizona sun, with the proper SPF, don’t want a recurrence of the skin cancer.

40 years ago he did a real service for his country.

But he really needs to retire in 2010.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Or be retired.  And I don&#039;t want his daughter to successfully follow in his footsteps, especially in the McCain clan&#039;s desire to destroy the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 17th, 2009 at 1:11 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:</p>
<p>Time for John to retire. Play some gold, soak up the Arizona sun, with the proper SPF, don’t want a recurrence of the skin cancer.</p>
<p>40 years ago he did a real service for his country.</p>
<p>But he really needs to retire in 2010.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or be retired.  And I don&#8217;t want his daughter to successfully follow in his footsteps, especially in the McCain clan&#8217;s desire to destroy the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveegg</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/17/john-mccains-aig-bailout-revisionism/comment-page-1/#comment-651620</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24847#comment-651620</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On March 17th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, DagneyT said: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;(from the boss)&lt;/i&gt; It can be a very effective, powerful too for organizing and for news-gathering.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If you know how to use it.
Are you offering to teach us, Michelle? You’re the only reason I signed up, and now strange people are “following” me!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
You already got a good start.  I recommend following &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ericjodom&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Eric Odom&lt;/a&gt;, he of the Tea Parties and Don&#039;t Go movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On March 17th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, DagneyT said: </p>
<blockquote><p><i>(from the boss)</i> It can be a very effective, powerful too for organizing and for news-gathering.</p></blockquote>
<p>If you know how to use it.<br />
Are you offering to teach us, Michelle? You’re the only reason I signed up, and now strange people are “following” me!</p></blockquote>
<p>You already got a good start.  I recommend following <a href="http://twitter.com/ericjodom" rel="nofollow">Eric Odom</a>, he of the Tea Parties and Don&#8217;t Go movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

