The Kabuki Theater of AIG Outrage

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 18, 2009 05:02 AM

My syndicated column today looks at the award-winning performances of Washington hypocrites outraged by the AIG entitlement beast they nurtured through four massive bailout infusions. For added comic relief, be sure to read through the entire transcript of Robert Gibbs’ press briefing yesterday. (It’s been sanitized. Just add 25 “ums” during every exchange on AIG and you will ensure accuracy.) This morning, AIG president Edward Liddy will take the hot-seat during a congressional hearing so that his enablers can wag their fingers at him while letting themselves off the hook again. One observer expects “outright talk of nationalization.” The House Financial Services subcommittee hearing begins at 10am Eastern.

As that flogging ritual takes place, hark! Tiny Tim Geithner hears the distant sounds of yonder bus wheels thumping.

On with the show…

***

The Kabuki Theater of AIG Outrage
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009

All the world’s a stage, wrote Shakespeare, and in the world of Washington, the curtains have opened on the most elaborate farce of the year. Welcome, taxpayers, to the Kabuki Theater of AIG Outrage – where D.C.’s histrionic enablers of taxpayer-funded corporate bailouts compete for Best Performance of Hypocritical Indignation.

Over the weekend, cloaked in their finest populist costumes, the Beltway’s hair-sprayed and powdered politicians and White House aides took to the airwaves to inveigh against $165 million in employee retention payments paid out by the government-backed insurance giant. Those bennies were reportedly part of a larger $450 million round of bonuses. After subpoenaing AIG, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo informed Congress that 73 employees in the very division responsible for the financial meltdown received bonuses of $1 million or more – 11 of whom left the company after getting the cash to retain them.

The checks were mailed Friday, but the March 15 bonus deadline had been on the Capitol Hill radar screen since December — when Maryland Democrat Rep. Elijah Cummings released a letter to AIG president Edward Liddy that noted: “Without taxpayer intervention, AIG would have ceased to exist and, to be blunt, all of its employees would have lost their jobs. Against this background – and given the massive layoffs occurring at other major financial entities, such as Citibank – the American taxpayers have a right to know why senior executives at AIG, who are frankly lucky to still have jobs, need to receive additional bonus payments of any kind to retain them at AIG.”

But it wasn’t until last week that the hapless court jester of the Obama administration, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, scrambled to rein in the payments. Liddy basically told him to buzz off. Geithner, the primary architect of the original $85 billion AIG bailout last fall, “reluctantly” approved the bonuses anyway. And now his outraged boss has ordered him to scour every legal nook and cranny possible to get the money back.

Spare me President Obama’s finger wag. He’s “outraged?” Meh. Two weeks ago, Team Obama forked over another $30 billion for the basket-case company after it reported $61.7 billion in fourth-quarter losses. That’s on top of the first $85 billion round and the second $38 billion round under Bush – both of which Barack Obama supported. (Obama, by the way, collected $103,000 in AIG campaign contributions.) Don’t talk to me about how the Obama administration opposes rewarding failure.

And don’t talk to me about all the politicians stampeding to tax AIG’s bonuses. Democrat Sen. Chris Dodd, the corporate crony who is the largest recipient of AIG donations (total: $281,400), is now leading the charge to tax the retention payments in order to recoup the $450 million the company is paying to employees in its financial products unit.

But Dodd, it turns out, was for protecting AIG’s bonuses before he was against them.

Fox Business reporter Rich Edson pointed out that during the Senate porkulus negotiations last month, Dodd successfully inserted a teeny, tiny amendment that provided for an “’exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009,’ which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are seeking to tax.” Pay no attention to what his left hand was doing. Dodd’s right fist is pounding mightily, mightily for the sake of the taxpayers.

The hypocritical indignation on the Hill is bipartisan. On his Twitter page last night, GOP Sen. John McCain huffed: “If we hadn’t bailed out AIG = no bonuses for greedy execs.” Well, if the GOP presidential candidate had held fast to his opposition to such doomed corporate bailouts in the first place, maybe bailout-palooza wouldn’t have spiraled into the gazillion-dollar mess it inevitably became. McCain asserted in a Twitter interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulous Tuesday morning that he “would have never bailed out AIG.”

But on September 18, 2008, McCain performed a 24-hour flip-flop and abandoned his principled opposition to the $85 billion AIG bailout, lamenting that the “government was forced” to do it. Soon after, McCain joined Obama in supporting the $25 billion auto bailout, the first $350 billion banking bailout (TARP I), and his own massive $300 billion mortgage bailout.

If Washington’s newfound opponents of rewarding failure want to do taxpayers a favor, how about giving back their automatic pay raises? How about returning all their AIG donations? How about taking back all the bailout money to all the failed enterprises, from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to AIG, the automakers, and the big banks? Barry? Harry? Nancy? John? Chris? Bueller? Bueller?

Exit stage left. The curtain falls.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: AIG

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:16 am, Micheleeroo said:

    A Seattle website called Examiner.com reports that Senator Obama received a nice “bonus” from AIG to the tune of $101,000 in contributions. Oh, cry us a river, B.O.! Saw this on Drudge.

  2. #2
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:16 am, Micheleeroo said:

    ..or could we say Obama was FOR AIG before he was against them???

  3. #3
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:20 am, Michelle Malkin said:

    Uh, did you read my column? It’s right there:

    (Obama, by the way, collected $103,000 in AIG campaign contributions.)

  4. #4
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:38 am, graysonret said:

    First, create an “enemy” (Corporations and the rich). Second, move in to make sure they run properly and the rich don’t “get richer” (nationalization). Third, dupe the people into thinking you solved a problem (socialism and party power).

  5. #5
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:52 am, AcidReflux said:

    March 18 (Bloomberg) — Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told congressional leaders the U.S. will recoup executive bonuses paid by American International Group Inc. as outraged lawmakers raced to take back such payments from all companies getting federal bailouts.

    Geithner, who has come under fire from Congress over the AIG payments, said in a letter to lawmakers last night the government will recover the money by requiring it be repaid from company operations and deducting the amount from the next $30 billion in aid being provided to the insurer.

    DO THEY REALLY THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID?

  6. #6
    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:57 am, gridlock said:

    Obama and Geithner have chosen to look incompetent instead of dishonest. The coming AIG bonuses were known to all for half a year. They were required by law (thanks to Senator Dodd (D-CT)). For Obama and Geithner to claim that they did not hear about these bonuses until last week “strains belief”, as Hillary! would say…

  7. #7
    On March 18th, 2009 at 6:11 am, conservativesRus said:

    Every last congress person who claims “I didn’t know that was in there” then is going to have a very difficult time claiming to me they read the entire stimulus bill in only a few days.
    Chap has defended the short bill reading/analysis/debate time in the past saying essentially “they all knew what was in the bill”. I realize these are different bills, but the fact is, very few congressritters actually read what it is they vote on.
    My local rep claims he didn’t know these “bonus” items were in the bill.

  8. #8
    On March 18th, 2009 at 6:17 am, conservativesRus said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:52 am, AcidReflux said:
    DO THEY REALLY THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID?

    Yes – and trouble is, a great percentage of the people (including congress) are in fact that stupid.
    Geithner might be that stupid too. He hasn’t done anything to demonstrate otherwise.

  9. #9
    On March 18th, 2009 at 6:17 am, PKAmmoTroop said:

    Senator Barack Obama received a $101,332 bonus from American International Group in the form of political contributions according to Opensecrets.org. The two biggest Congressional recipients of bonuses from the A.I.G. are – Senators Chris Dodd and Senator Barack Obama.

    The plot thickens!!!

  10. #10
    On March 18th, 2009 at 6:41 am, CoastalConservative said:

    Can anyone explain to me why the Nobama administration is so concerned with distancing itself from rewarding failure? Haven’t these statists (per Mark Levin directive :-) ) been doing the same with welfare for decades?

  11. #11
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:02 am, jimpenny said:

    Kabuki Theater……loved it!

    Vote. The. Bums. OUT!

  12. #12
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:07 am, Mach1Duck said:

    The whole idea and implementation of a bailout is stupid. All it has done is to maintain an artificial economic stage in a market which is trying to correct itself. Pouring money into it will only porlong its process of correction.

  13. #13
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:20 am, zorro said:

    Excellent column.

    I would love to hear some direct, honest answers to your questions in the closing paragraph. It will never happen, honesty is a rare commodity in DC.

  14. #14
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:22 am, maine yankee said:

    ” I’m shocked, I tell you, shocked !”

  15. #15
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:22 am, jjmurphy said:

    In previous comments I have likened these buffoons in D.C to pre-school children and junior high school students for their actions.

    My deepest apologies to pre-school children and junior high school students. Even the governance of the US by these young kids would be better than what we have now.

    Incompetence, hypocrisy, corruption, power-grabs, cowardice, are the order of the day in D.C.

    I am tempted to ask, can it get any worse, but we all know it can, and will.

  16. #16
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:33 am, ricnrolle said:

    Obama can’t find 540m for our wounded troops yet…
    20B increase for food stamps
    46.7B for Education
    26.3B for energy
    72.5B for transportation
    13.3B for labor
    12B for windmills and solar???wtf
    18.7B to monitor GLOBAL WARMING wtf
    and the topper of the topper
    51.7BILLION for FOREIGN AID
    Total just for these few

    261.2 Billion

    WHERE WOULD THOSE BASTARDS BE WITHOUT OUR MILITARY?????
    Why not drop that last one for those who gave so much?
    I am really pissed!!!!!!!!

  17. #17
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:34 am, ricnrolle said:

    sorry for going off topic but again I am really pissed!!!!!!!!

  18. #18
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:45 am, rambler said:

    So the gov is outraged about about the millions in bonuses but doesn’t care much about the trillions in debt to shore up AIG and other banks. If anyone needs to resign or commit suicide it’s the member of congress who voted for all this without first reading the bills.

  19. #19
    On March 18th, 2009 at 7:53 am, scituate_tgr said:

    rambler said: So the gov is outraged knew all along about the millions in bonuses but and doesn’t care much about the trillions in debt to shore up AIG and other banks.

    Just sayin…

  20. #20
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:02 am, Send_Me said:

    1. Mrs. Malkin, thanks for the informative column.
    2. It’s a shame that folks in this country don’t know the basics of the Constitution anymore. If only they’d read skim it, they’d know that this indignation is unfounded. The executive branch executes the laws written by the legislative branch. As Mrs. Malkin’s column states, the law passed by Congress (thank you Sen. Dodd) actually sought to protect the bonuses. Now Obama is looking for all “legal means” to get the money back? I see that was the plan all along. “The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower becomes the lender’s slave.” Proverbs 22:7

  21. #21
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:02 am, ajmontana said:

    Exit stage left. The curtain falls.

    We need a Vaudeville stage hook to yank these clowns out of office.

  22. #22
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:05 am, johnsteele said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 5:52 am, AcidReflux said:

    DO THEY REALLY THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID?

    fifty-Two percent of us are, the 52% that voted for this Marxist.

  23. #23
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:16 am, JohnnyD said:

    If I were Liddy, I’d sit there and let the “inmates” pontificate and bluster. Then when it is my turn to talk, I’d call them all hipocites and remind them about the little provision they VOTED on and then say Screw You. Then get up and leave.

    Of course, the press would make Liddy look like the fool instead of the idiot scum called senators!

    OH, and keep up the great work Michelle.

  24. #24
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:17 am, mjk said:

    I was talking to a friend of mine about the insurance for the military thing. Of course, I didn’t tell her that her favorite person eva was the one who came up with the idiotic idea of the military getting private insurance. I did, however, point out that if you’re injured in an act of war, the insurance won’t cover you. She thought it was beyond stupid. Of course once she finds out that Obama was the one with the bright idea, she’ll change her tune right quick.

  25. #25
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:53 am, mytake said:

    Best column ever! Glad it was on Drudge so more people will read it. Can’t wait until April 15!!!!

  26. #26
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:56 am, mytake said:

    I wonder if Obama will send his hitmen after Michelle?

  27. #27
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:57 am, orlandocajun said:

    A small price to pay…

    Although I would have rather that the government not get into the bail out business in the first place, a lot of good may come from this. There is so much genuine outrage from Americans about bail-outs, and their related fall-outs, it’s unlikely that the government will try this again. So, if at the end of the day the American taxpayers wind up owning one failed insurance company, it may be a small price to pay in order to save our capitalistic system.

    Also, the disgust and contempt that many Americans now have for the Federal Government (too bad it took some so long to open their eyes), could result in a positive change in Congress in ’10.

    Now is the Democrats don’t destroy what’s left of the country by then, we still have hope.

  28. #28
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:58 am, mytake said:

    Bueler? Loved it!

  29. #29
    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:59 am, RedDog said:

    Breaking News Consumer Prices Rise 0.4 Percent in February

    Leave or Die?
    Senator Grassley defends saying AIG executives should ‘resign or go commit suicide’

    Here we go. The inflationary sprial amidst economic stagnation. Jimmy Carter years on steroids. Stop the barking and screeching you rats. Never mind Wall Street executives. This old toad Grassley needs to commit ritual seppuku along with all his cohorts in congress who conspired to steal tens of trillions in world savings for their own political benefit. The dope does not even see the irony. At the least he and the other congressional crooks need to be in a jail cell for 30 years.

  30. #30
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:03 am, Trollman said:

    Michelle Malkin said:

    White House aides took to the airwaves to inveigh against $165 million in employee retention payments

    Michelle used the word “inveigh.” I don’t know what that means. You need to take it easy on me, I went to government schools.

    Now in olden days, before the era of hope and change, whenever I found a word I didn’t know, I would just look it up. But now I think I’ll just sit here on my rooftop waiting for Obama to bail me out from my ignorance…

  31. #31
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:05 am, mytake said:

    This is so unfair. We need to give Obama and his team a fair chance. It’s too soon to judge. Yea, right!

  32. #32
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:07 am, chapoutier said:

    fifty-Two percent of us are, the 52% that voted for this Marxist.

    53!!! 53 percent of us voted for that marxist!!!

    Nice article MM. Why did you leave out Grassley here? I thought his quotes were at least the most entertaining. Or was it more about hypocrisy (presuming Grassley relatively clean here) than kabuki?

  33. #33
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:16 am, Misscheryl said:

    How bout the salary for congress be $1.00/year.

  34. #34
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:18 am, Misscheryl said:

    Chap – as a lawyer you know what “evidence” is of value to the crux of a case vs that which is not. Grassley’s comments were stupid, no more or less than that. PS – why do you always start the side show.

  35. #35
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:20 am, RedDog said:

    Drudge headlines re: the Grade School Bandits…

    OBAMA THANKS HIMSELF IN TELEPROMPTER BLUNDER AT WHITE HOUSE…
    ——————————————————————————–
    Obama Administration: We Didn’t Find Out About AIG Bonuses Until This Month…
    ——————————————————————————–

    PAPER: Obama Received a $101,332 ‘Bonus’ from AIG…

    PELOSI EYES ATTORNEY GENERAL TO RECOVER $$ FROM COMPANIES GETTING AID…
    ——————————————————————————–
    White House Defends Geithner’s Handling…

    CITI Economist Heads to Treasury…

    They apparently have an excuse for everything. These morons are going to plant this 757 into a mountainside. Absolutely clueless when it comes to anything other than advancing their own personal gain. They can always return to their fall back position: George Bush did it.

  36. #36
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:21 am, ajmontana said:

    53!!! 53 percent of us YOU MORONS voted for that marxist!!!

    Fixed.

  37. #37
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:28 am, Jeff2161 said:

    compete for Best Performance of Hypocritical Indignation.

    Heh

  38. #38
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:29 am, Kevin K. said:

    [From MM's text:]

    One observer expects “outright talk of nationalization.”

    You mean, 80% isn’t nationalization??

  39. #39
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:33 am, Misscheryl said:

    Be thankful – we are witnessing some thing historic. The era when the United States of America becomes a facist state run by our own true blue African American Facist (AAF for quick reference)! The era when we become subjects and not citizens.

  40. #40
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:36 am, sonofdy said:

    158 million on bonuses is an outrage, but 1.4 trillion and growing is a good thing…

    obamalogic at work.

  41. #41
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:37 am, Jeff2161 said:

    ” Time to round up the USUAL suspects…”

  42. #42
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:40 am, chapoutier said:

    Chap – as a lawyer you know what “evidence” is of value to the crux of a case vs that which is not. Grassley’s comments were stupid, no more or less than that. PS – why do you always start the side show.

    Huh? The title of the column is “Kabuki Theater of AIG Outrage” the subtitle of the Grassley post is… wait for it…. “Kabuki Theater of Outrage.” I am not criticizing, I am curious about why Grassley was left out when she made such a big deal of him just yesterday. And that is hardly a “sideshow” question. That is a question about the freaking column itself. What could be more on topic?

  43. #43
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:48 am, BOB said:

    Obama will get some of the money by trying to eliminate most of the military.

    Russia just announced a “major military buildup.” They shouldn’t have to do a lot of building to be superior to what Obama will leave us with after he finishes off the military.

  44. #44
    On March 18th, 2009 at 9:49 am, Misscheryl said:

    Chap – my apologies. Your post sounded critical to me, I’m glad you are in total agreement with Michelle on the hypocracy of Obama and his administration. Again, I apologize

  45. #45
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:07 am, cheapseat said:

    loved the post article michelle, and i find it incredibly hard to believe that i knew the aig big wigs were going to get retention bonusses while all the people inside the beltway didn’t. i heard about it last fall when the 1st bailout was being rushed through congress. dodd had to know about it, because he specifically blocked the part of the bill designed to eliminate it. the head of aig was on a sunday news show explaining that if aig was to ever pay the money back it needed to keep it’s valuable staff. how can these lying a-holes now claim they didn’t know about this until last week. was barry in hawaii when this was on the news, tending to his grandmother? i know i saw the aig president on a news show explaining this debacle last year.

  46. #46
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:21 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    DO THEY REALLY THINK WE ARE THAT STUPID? Sadly they and their MSM apologist do indeed think at least a large enough segment of the population is that stupid as has been pointed out—

    53!!! 53 percent of (us, we, you, them) MORONS voted for that marxist!!!

    Yes, there are indeed people that stupid. The moral outrage, screaming and histrionics of our Senators and Congressmen is over the top but really stupid and lazy people are easily impressed.

    If there had never been a bail-out there would be no argument but that is beyond some folks grasp.


    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  47. #47
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:24 am, right4life said:

    becomes a facist state run by our own true blue African American Facist (AAF for quick reference)!

    we’re back in the USSA..don’t know how lucky you are boys…back in the US back in the USSA…

  48. #48
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:25 am, corona said:

    You’re going to have to write a retraction, Michelle. Search the web for the original coverage of this – Dodd proposed the amendment to stop the bonuses, but had nothing to do with the exemption.

  49. #49
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:35 am, Misscheryl said:

    Analysis: AIG bonuses new cloud over Treasury boss

    WASHINGTON – If not distancing itself from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner

    As I mentioned yesterday, Obama throwing Geithner under the bus in 3…2…1…

  50. #50
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:36 am, nbarry said:

    Michelle cannot emphasize strongly enough that these posturing politicians were all in favor of taking Wall Street’s campaign contributions until they were against it. We need to legally redefine bribery to include campaign quid pro quos.

  51. #51
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:41 am, KCK said:

    Democrats are against compensation, and against profits. Control is good, though. They love control.

    And they want our guns now (HR 45). And someone (everyone denies responsibility) sent the active army into an Alabama town – see Drudge. Feeling safe?

    Paint me fed up.

  52. #52
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:42 am, kilroyshere said:

    OBAMA; Less then 4 to go and out.

  53. #53
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:43 am, walterc said:

    corona said:

    You’re going to have to write a retraction, Michelle. Search the web for the original coverage of this – Dodd proposed the amendment to stop the bonuses, but had nothing to do with the exemption.

    source please.

  54. #54
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:46 am, RedDog said:

    One observer expects “outright talk of nationalization.” The House Financial Services subcommittee hearing begins at 10am Eastern.

    How about outright talk of armed revolution by American workers? How ’bout them apples you thieving frauds? Please have the decency to commit ritual seppuku now.

  55. #55
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:51 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Yep, Geithner is the next one to feel bus tire tracks. Wonder when it will happen…when BHO’s approval numbers go below a certain point?
    Anyway, it’ll be another thing to get the media off topic for several weeks.
    What a mess….and this ole country keeps on keepin on….
    God Bless America

  56. #56
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:55 am, corona said:

    more on the Dems’ incompetence (which this blog and others failed to catch) here

  57. #57
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:57 am, cheapseat said:

    chap, 51% actually, but 2% voted twice. nonetheless, we are all in the crapper now. but the 64 trillion dollar question now is why are the msm going along with this farce that geithner and obama didn’t know about this when the entire educated population of the u.s. knew about it months ago? must not be NEWS to catch a democrat president in a bald faced lie. i did not have sex with that woman, miss lewinsky. how my semen got on her dress is a total mystery.

  58. #58
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:57 am, right4life said:

    Dodd is just a victim of all that AIG donation money…corrupting a good man like chris dodd :roll:

  59. #59
    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:58 am, GladzKravtz said:

    Will Obama throw Chris Dodd under the bus for coming up with the exclusion that allowed the bonuses (bona)?

    Why isn’t Chris Dodd being questioned more about this? Can anyone direct me to any heat he is feeling?

  60. #60
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:01 am, chapoutier said:

    chap, 51% actually, but 2% voted twice.

    That only gets you to 52.02%. Almost 3.9% of Obama voters must have voted twice to get to 53%.

  61. #61
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:01 am, RobM1981 said:

    IT’S OFFICIAL! GEITHNER HAS BEEN THROWN UNDER THE BUS!

    You catch the Press Briefing just now? “Obama has complete confidence in his Treasury Secretary,” BUT…

    “Secretary Geithner last week engaged with the CEO of AIG to communicate what we thought were outrageous and unacceptable bonuses,” White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday.

    President Barack Hussein Obama? He had NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. He doesn’t even KNOW Timothy Geithner…

  62. #62
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Misscheryl said:

    President Barack Hussein Obama? He had NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. He doesn’t even KNOW Timothy Geithner…

    hahahaahhahahahaha!!!! The sad part is, he could actually use this excuse and 51% of the population would believe him.

  63. #63
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:05 am, dan708 said:

    The thing that continues to astound is the complete and utter lack of shame on the part of all the people involved. If this were a less-civilized country, people would be rioting in the streets over this.

  64. #64
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:08 am, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 10:57 am, right4life said:

    Dodd is just a victim of all that AIG donation money…corrupting a good man like chris dodd :roll:

    Should we take up a collection and send him to the Emerald City in the Land of OZ so the Wonderful Wizard can give him a brain?


    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  65. #65
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:09 am, Gorebot said:

    It would be so cool if Liddy virulently dressed-down the Dais of Clowns presuming to question him.

    AIG is no saint in this, but the real culprits are the profound morons presuming to chastise it.

    Dodd: “You paid a bonus I approved for special exemption??!? How dare you?”

    Pelosi: “You flew a private jet for your own convenience to get here without paying for it yourself??? How dare you???”

    Grassley: “You haven’t committed suicide yet??!? How dare you???”

    Why did Flight 93 have to be the one that failed?

  66. #66
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am, Socky said:

    You know why I’m happy to be a conservative? Because this is what the voices of the left sound like.

  67. #67
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:10 am, Laree said:

    Jon Stewart admits Tucker Carlson was right.

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/jon-stewart-tucker-carlson-was-right.html

    Jon Stewart weighs in on Tea Bagging the White House.

  68. #68
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:12 am, Misscheryl said:

    It’s off topic but very important:

    House Readies Passage of Volunteerism Bill Critics Call Pricey, Forced Service
    The legislation will expand the1993 AmeriCorps program to match the renewed interest in national service since President Obama’s election, which backers say is crucial in tough economic times.
    By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos

  69. #69
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:14 am, moonsbreath said:

    I’m more upset over the $90 billion of taxpayer money that AIG gave to European banks.

    Where’s the outrage on this?

  70. #70
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am, ErinF said:

    From the First Book of Democrat:
    Psalm 2008-2012

    Obama is my shepherd, I shall not want.
    He leadeth me beside the still factories.
    He restoreth my faith in the Republican Party.
    He guideth me toward the path of unemployment.
    Yea, though I walk through the valley
    of the breadline, I shall not go hungry.
    Obama has anointed my income with taxes.
    My expenses runneth over my income.
    Surely, poverty and hardship will follow me
    all the days of his term.
    From hence forth, we will live all the days of our lives in a rented home with an overseas landlord.

    “I am glad I am an American,
    I am glad that I am free.
    But I wish I was a dog,
    and Obama was a tree.”

  71. #71
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:20 am, pueblo1032 said:

    We have senators (named SCHUMER) who are threatening to tax the AIG bonuses at a rate of 100%… This BRAINDEAD IDIOT obviously has no concept of THE CONSTITUTION… That alone should scare the people to take action against this MORON… These are the same LAWMAKERS who said we must not delay TAXMAN GIETHNER appointment… HURRY, HURRY!!! The same administration who said pass the “STIMULUS” PRONTO, no time to read it, let alone DEBATE… HURRY, HURRY!!! Now we have to CHASTISE the HEAD of AIG, just like the AUTO EXECS… Wring our hands, and show DEEP CONSTERNATION!!! MICHELLE, as you say DEEEEP KABUKI, or as I interpret it, DEEEEEEEEP BULL S*#T!!!

  72. #72
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:22 am, prendad said:

    Dear, dear Michelle, you are brilliant.

  73. #73
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:22 am, Misscheryl said:

    pueblo1032, my next question – what if they don’t care for what mainstream Americans are doing? Will we get taxed to the point of oblivion? They are using taxation as a weapon. What the heck else do we as American’s need? This is blatant criminality.

  74. #74
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:26 am, JohnnyD said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am, ErinF said:


    ROFLMAO!

    AMEN!!

  75. #75
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:31 am, prendad said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:19 am, ErinF said:
    From the First Book of Democrat:
    Psalm 2008-2012

    I hope you will be happy, your quote has just been sent to most of Northern Indiana :) .

  76. #76
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:33 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Why is anyone asking why? I mean really. This is not about the facts of the matter. Its about perception. If AIG could have paid these bonuses and made our congressmen/women look good, we’d not be having these hearings. Nothing about any of this, or what is still coming that will be just like this AIG mess, should surprise anyone. Expect more of it. The way these companies can avoid it is by either finding a way to blame Bush for it OR by making our current batch of “leaders” look good. Nothing about any of this is based on what is “right or wrong”, what makes sense or doesn’t, what is sane or insane.

    We are not at some place of reason and principle in this country. Where we are is media sound bites and perceptions. We just elected a president due to the winner managing perceptions successfully enough to win.

    Give up the “why’s”. We can’t argue our way into this making sense to the folks in power. We will need to file law suits regarding constitutionality as stop gap and then in 2010 VOTE VOTE VOTE, and in 2012 VOTE VOTE VOTE.

    The left cares nothing about if something is constitutional or not. They only care about what they can get away with.

    It is time to stop fighting them at the current site of this war. It is time to move all that effort, the making sense of it, the expectation that “R” congress folks will fight for us, and re-focus funds and energy to the court system and start blocking aspects of their current attempt to remake America with legal challenges.

    The longer we wait for someone at the congressional level to stand up for us, the more we will lose freedom and liberty.

    We have to fight where it will matter. Challenging the constitutionality of these new “laws” is our best hope.

    Let them do whatever they want. We’ll see them daily in court.

    This stuff is actually pretty cool. Can’t think of a better example than how the government wants to take over than this AIG matter.

    It is just starting to get interesting isn’t it?

  77. #77
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:35 am, Salt said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:01 am, RobM1981 said:

    President Barack Hussein Obama? He had NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS. He doesn’t even KNOW Timothy Geithner…

    Ha. He’s just some guy from the neighborhood.

  78. #78
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:35 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Barney Frank this morning on the wisdom of retaining AIG executives via bonuses (I paraphrase):

    “It doesn’t make sense that those who created this mess should be in charge of fixing it”.

    Frank said the U.S. stood a better chance of prevailing in court against the company or its employees if it acted as the owner rather than as a regulator intervening in the private sector.

    And who were the primary political architects of the “ownership society” AIG’s products were accommodating? Clueless.

    BTW, McCain was 3rd or 4th on that list of AIG campaign contributions.

  79. #79
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:38 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Bloomberg TV is reporting that rumors are circulating that dissent is brewing on the Fed Board. Sentiment is growing for a more neutral Fed. Keep in mind that Bernanke cannot act without majority support of the Board.

  80. #80
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:40 am, Salt said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:35 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Barney Frank this morning on the wisdom of retaining AIG executives via bonuses (I paraphrase):

    “It doesn’t make sense that those who created this mess should be in charge of fixing it”.

    No matter what he does (or did) Barney will always consider himself completely blameless.

  81. #81
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:40 am, prendad said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:33 am, jsmiddleton4 said:
    Why is anyone asking why? I mean really. This is not about the facts of the matter. Its about perception. If AIG could have paid these bonuses and made our congressmen/women look good, we’d not be having these hearings. Nothing about any of this, or what is still coming that will be just like this AIG mess, should surprise anyone. Expect more of it. The way these companies can avoid it is by either finding a way to blame Bush for it OR by making our current batch of “leaders” look good. Nothing about any of this is based on what is “right or wrong”, what makes sense or doesn’t, what is sane or insane.

    We are not at some place of reason and principle in this country. Where we are is media sound bites and perceptions. We just elected a president due to the winner managing perceptions successfully enough to win.

    Give up the “why’s”. We can’t argue our way into this making sense to the folks in power. We will need to file law suits regarding constitutionality as stop gap and then in 2010 VOTE VOTE VOTE, and in 2012 VOTE VOTE VOTE.

    The left cares nothing about if something is constitutional or not. They only care about what they can get away with.

    It is time to stop fighting them at the current site of this war. It is time to move all that effort, the making sense of it, the expectation that “R” congress folks will fight for us, and re-focus funds and energy to the court system and start blocking aspects of their current attempt to remake America with legal challenges.

    The longer we wait for someone at the congressional level to stand up for us, the more we will lose freedom and liberty.

    We have to fight where it will matter. Challenging the constitutionality of these new “laws” is our best hope.

    Let them do whatever they want. We’ll see them daily in court.

    This stuff is actually pretty cool. Can’t think of a better example than how the government wants to take over than this AIG matter.

    It is just starting to get interesting isn’t it?

    Yes it is brother, yes it is.

  82. #82
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:46 am, Pasadena Phil said:

    Here’s the Bloomberg link on dissention brewing in the Fed.

  83. #83
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:49 am, retro said:

    This hypocrisy reminds me of that Dilbert cartoon that came out a week or two back…

    “I yeild to the hippocryte from another state…”

  84. #84
    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:55 am, jsmiddleton4 said:

    Usually there is a longer loop between the government’s actions and the unintentional consequences of their action. Those of us abnormal political junkies can usually follow the dots and connect them so that we get it. We get that the mom and pop tool and die that specialized in making hardware for high end sail boats and to close their shop and lay off workers in the middle of Wisconsin because congress raised taxes on luxury boats so that the boat builder in Seattle stopped selling and making boats.

    We political junkies easily see that the blame for laying off workers and closing down the mom and pop operation in Wisconsin is due to Congress raising taxes on luxury sail boats.

    However almost no one else is tenacious enough to to the work to get through all the steps because normally the steps and the loop are too long to navigate.

    And those of us who get it, we just don’t understand why folks don’t.

    However the good news is with this AIG thing, the loop is short and the dots/steps are few. The unintended consequence of AIG executives getting their contractual bonuses is only a few steps removed from Dodd, Frank, bail-out money. This time folks who normally don’t get it because the dots/steps/loop are too long, too many dots to connect, even THOSE folks see it this time.

    Even THOSE folks are realizing that their tax money going to AIG execs is pissing them off, those folks see its not JUST AIG this time. This time its the congress and Obama. There are only a few dots to connect this time.

    Oh this is so interesting…..

  85. #85
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:00 pm, prendad said:

    Oh yes it is brother, yes it is.

  86. #86
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:05 pm, prendad said:

    You know, I want to laugh at such an inexperienced, juvenile president, but then I hesitate, knowing what damage he IS doing and CAN DO to this country during the next 3 years. May GOD show us wisdom.

  87. #87
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, Buy Danish said:

    Well done, Michelle. Speaking of “hypocritical indignation”, it’s worth recalling that Andrew Cuomo bears great responsibility for this housing crisis too – the very crisis which precipitated A.I.G.’s decline.

  88. #88
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:47 pm, Laree said:

    This Morning Imus In The Morning.

    Laura Ingraham Weighs in on Today’s Topics including A.I.G. To Big to Fail.

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/03/imus-guest-laura-ingraham-weighs-in-on.html

  89. #89
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:54 pm, azcojones said:

    Michelle:

    I don’t want to insult the folks from Warner Brothers and the Merry Melodies gang, but I thought the following to be most appropriate for what we are currently witnessing on stage in the DC Kabuki Theater:

    Overture, curtains, lights,
    This is it, the night of nights.
    No more rehearsing and nursing a part
    We know every part by heart.
    Overture, curtains, lights
    This is it, you’ll hit the heights.
    And oh what heights we’ll hit.
    On with the show this is it!

    Tonight what heights we’ll hit,
    On with the show this is it!

  90. #90
    On March 18th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, corona said:

    Hellooooooooooooooooo ….

    While the Senate was constructing the $787 billion stimulus last month, Dodd added an executive-compensation restriction to the bill. The provision, now called “the Dodd Amendment” by the Obama Administration provides an “exception for contractually obligated bonuses agreed on before Feb. 11, 2009” — which exempts the very AIG bonuses Dodd and others are now seeking to tax.

    Dodd’s original amendment did not include that exemption, and the Connecticut Senator denied inserting the provision.

    yet another link

  91. #91
    On March 18th, 2009 at 1:07 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Sit down for this one. Apparently in his letter to Congress this morning, Golden Tim Geithner assured outraged lawmakers that the Treasury will “recover” the bonus payments by reducing the next bailout payment!!!

    (((((((((((AAARGH!!!!))))))))))

  92. #92
    On March 18th, 2009 at 1:16 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Good work Michelle. As a bonus, people here in Vero are canceling their subscriptions to our local mullet wrapper because your column is in the op-ed “On the Right”. I can’t wait until they are out of business.

  93. #93
    On March 18th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, Elm Creek Smith said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 11:01 am, chapoutier said:

    chap, 51% actually, but 2% voted twice.

    That only gets you to 52.02%. Almost 3.9% of Obama voters must have voted twice to get to 53%.

    With Acorn on the job, the number of Da One’s voters who voted multiple times is irrelevant. There is clear evidence of massive voter fraud. Many of them may have voted in multiple states, multiple times, both in person and by absentee ballot.

    Hope is not a plan; not all change is good. The resistance is here; the resistance is now. RESIST!!!!

    ECS

  94. #94
    On March 18th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Here is the link to Geithner’s letter to Congress.

  95. #95
    On March 18th, 2009 at 1:41 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    The full text of Geithner’s letter.

  96. #96
    On March 18th, 2009 at 2:15 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    So what Obama says today is this.

    “Just as outrageous is the culture that these bonuses are a symptom of, that has existed for far too long: excess greed, excess compensation, excess risk-taking,”

    Since when does he get to say what the private sector will pay someone for doing a job?

    This guy is a huge socialist. But he won’t say a damned word about the gigantic sums of money Bill Clinton got paid for flapping his jaw in front of an audience. No… that’s different.

    What about George “I whine like a baby when my computer breaks” Soros? Nooooo….. that’s different.

    Obama is hellbent of destoying the values of that built this country. He can rot in hell after he gets’ booted out of office in 2012.

  97. #97
    On March 18th, 2009 at 2:38 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Why all the worry over the chump change to AIG?

    Chris Dodd’s Buddies at Fannie Mae are doing well it seems:

    Fannie plans bonuses of up to $611K for 4 execs

    But they are not done yet

    ACORN to Help with 2010 Census… Are you kidding me?

    Farewell our America, you will be missed.


    Keep the change-I’ll keep my guns

  98. #98
    On March 18th, 2009 at 2:49 pm, davidcaskey said:

    What about Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae? They got bonuses but were friends of Obama and group.

    For that matter, the politicians got a raise despite the fact the country is broke and the budget is in deficit.

  99. #99
    On March 18th, 2009 at 3:27 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On March 18th, 2009 at 8:56 am, mytake said:
    I wonder if Obama will send his hitmen after Michelle?

    Um…let him try. There will be dire consequences if ANYTHING happenes to Michelle, Rush, or any of our spokespeople!! I believe that would start the war. And, folks…they will NEVER get our guns, count on it. NEVER. If they try, there will be a lot of very dead marxists. I think they know that.

  100. #100
    On March 18th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, cheapseat said:

    chap, the other 1% was the military ballots democrat election judges threw out because they were not notorized. after all, notary publics in afghanistan and iraq are everywhere.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Bush nostalgia: Let’s not get carried away, ok?

November 9, 2010 10:04 AM by Michelle Malkin

91 Comments

Barney Frank has a snit fit

June 11, 2009 12:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments

Goodbye, sir!

After the “Special Master of Compensation”

June 9, 2009 04:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Feds extend Crap Sandwich to life insurers

April 8, 2009 09:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments

Gulp.

Salary control: You knew it was coming

March 31, 2009 10:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

168 Comments

Grabby Hands.

“Because they are undeserving of it”

March 30, 2009 06:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments

Asshats In Government.

Financial manipulation alert: Did AIG bailout money secretly prop up banks?

March 30, 2009 10:03 AM by Michelle Malkin

41 Comments

Artifice in government.


Categories: AIG

Babalu Blog

» Greece is Burning
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook