<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lovely: 13 bailout recipients owe $220 million in back taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:30:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: April Fool&#8217;s Day - Mail Order Tea Party &#171; Designated Conservative</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-663043</link>
		<dc:creator>April Fool&#8217;s Day - Mail Order Tea Party &#171; Designated Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-663043</guid>
		<description>[...] to protest the massive growth in the federal government through the bailout, borrow, spend, and tax policies of President Obama and the Democrat Congressional leadership.  This Designated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to protest the massive growth in the federal government through the bailout, borrow, spend, and tax policies of President Obama and the Democrat Congressional leadership.  This Designated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lovely: 13 bailout recipients owe $220 million in back taxes &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-655431</link>
		<dc:creator>Lovely: 13 bailout recipients owe $220 million in back taxes &#171; Top Daily Digest Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-655431</guid>
		<description>[...] Learn more here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Learn more here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13 Companies Receiving Bailouts Owe $220 Million In Back Taxes. Is it Time to Let Failing Companies Fail? &#124; THE WEEKLY POINT</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-654472</link>
		<dc:creator>13 Companies Receiving Bailouts Owe $220 Million In Back Taxes. Is it Time to Let Failing Companies Fail? &#124; THE WEEKLY POINT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-654472</guid>
		<description>[...] Michelle Malkin » Lovely: 13 bailout recipients owe $220 million in back taxes   Tell Your Friends: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michelle Malkin » Lovely: 13 bailout recipients owe $220 million in back taxes   Tell Your Friends: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micheleeroo</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-654459</link>
		<dc:creator>Micheleeroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-654459</guid>
		<description>Why is it that these democrats hate successful companies, yet throw massive $$ at dysfunctional companies who even owe back taxes??? Is the world upside down or what??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that these democrats hate successful companies, yet throw massive $$ at dysfunctional companies who even owe back taxes??? Is the world upside down or what??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PKAmmoTroop</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-654233</link>
		<dc:creator>PKAmmoTroop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-654233</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;      On March 19th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, lgm said:

      The bailouts are to keep collapsing companies from bringing down the US economy with them. You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not only do I know this theory, I wholly disagree with it and label it STUPID. MORONIC. IGNORANT. USELESS. CRIMINAL.

There&#039;s already a bailout built into US Law - it&#039;s called BANKRUPTCY. Don&#039;t pretend you don&#039;t know about it but you may be too ignorant of the law to realize what it really it.

A company that&#039;s down on their luck can file for BANKRUPTCY, restructure their debt, cut off the dead wood, throw out money loosing contracts and return stronger than ever without going out of business, without taking down the banks with them, and without putting undue burden on the American tax payer.

The only people that would lose are touchy-feely morons with no idea of how the financial system works and Democrats who are doing everything they can to sink this economy.

Of course with BANKRUPTCY you don&#039;t get Democrats handing out millions of taxpayer dollars for bonuses for their buddies and Democrat displays of manufactured rage when their hands are caught in the cookie jar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>      On March 19th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, lgm said:</p>
<p>      The bailouts are to keep collapsing companies from bringing down the US economy with them. You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Not only do I know this theory, I wholly disagree with it and label it STUPID. MORONIC. IGNORANT. USELESS. CRIMINAL.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s already a bailout built into US Law &#8211; it&#8217;s called BANKRUPTCY. Don&#8217;t pretend you don&#8217;t know about it but you may be too ignorant of the law to realize what it really it.</p>
<p>A company that&#8217;s down on their luck can file for BANKRUPTCY, restructure their debt, cut off the dead wood, throw out money loosing contracts and return stronger than ever without going out of business, without taking down the banks with them, and without putting undue burden on the American tax payer.</p>
<p>The only people that would lose are touchy-feely morons with no idea of how the financial system works and Democrats who are doing everything they can to sink this economy.</p>
<p>Of course with BANKRUPTCY you don&#8217;t get Democrats handing out millions of taxpayer dollars for bonuses for their buddies and Democrat displays of manufactured rage when their hands are caught in the cookie jar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-654232</link>
		<dc:creator>Salt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-654232</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On March 19th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, lgm said:

From the original…

&lt;blockquote&gt;        You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;m not sure that &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; know it.  Care to explain it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On March 19th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, lgm said:</p>
<p>From the original…</p>
<blockquote><p>        You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it.
</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure that <em>you</em> know it.  Care to explain it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chotii</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-654147</link>
		<dc:creator>chotii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-654147</guid>
		<description>The thing I want to say, and I&#039;m surprised nobody&#039;s said yet is this:

Aren&#039;t these the guys who donated BIG BUCKS to get Obama elected?

And if they are, why should we be surprised that they didn&#039;t pay their taxes? that seems to be the SOP for that crowd of &quot;bigwigs&quot; and &quot;prominent people&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I want to say, and I&#8217;m surprised nobody&#8217;s said yet is this:</p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t these the guys who donated BIG BUCKS to get Obama elected?</p>
<p>And if they are, why should we be surprised that they didn&#8217;t pay their taxes? that seems to be the SOP for that crowd of &#8220;bigwigs&#8221; and &#8220;prominent people&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lgm</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653986</link>
		<dc:creator>lgm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653986</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Salt&lt;/strong&gt; said (#34):

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;The bailouts are to keep collapsing companies from bringing down the US economy with them... &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Assuming all this is true, would you care to explain why the government would hand them a large sum of money?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

From the original...

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Salt</strong> said (#34):</p>
<blockquote><blockquote>The bailouts are to keep collapsing companies from bringing down the US economy with them&#8230; </p></blockquote>
<p>Assuming all this is true, would you care to explain why the government would hand them a large sum of money?</p></blockquote>
<p>From the original&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><blockquote>You may disagree with that theory, but don’t pretend you don’t know it.  </p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sillygatboy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653898</link>
		<dc:creator>sillygatboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653898</guid>
		<description>Millilons?

  Chump change.

  We don&#039;t even speak in billions any more.  

  It&#039;s all about trillions, baby!

  Rushing healong into Godzillions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Millilons?</p>
<p>  Chump change.</p>
<p>  We don&#8217;t even speak in billions any more.  </p>
<p>  It&#8217;s all about trillions, baby!</p>
<p>  Rushing healong into Godzillions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vsatt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653883</link>
		<dc:creator>vsatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653883</guid>
		<description>I owed a few hundred when I did last year&#039;s taxes, how much you want to bet they would come after me with a far greater intensity than the companies who owe the $220 million? I doubt I&#039;d get a bailout, I&#039;m probably not too big to fail in their opinion.

Tell me again, which party is looking out for the little guy and who&#039;s in the tank for the giant corporations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owed a few hundred when I did last year&#8217;s taxes, how much you want to bet they would come after me with a far greater intensity than the companies who owe the $220 million? I doubt I&#8217;d get a bailout, I&#8217;m probably not too big to fail in their opinion.</p>
<p>Tell me again, which party is looking out for the little guy and who&#8217;s in the tank for the giant corporations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enough with AIG; Obama&#8217;s Puppet Show and Democratic faux-Outrage &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653874</link>
		<dc:creator>Enough with AIG; Obama&#8217;s Puppet Show and Democratic faux-Outrage &#171; Northern Thoughts And Reflections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653874</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;assist&#8221; with the census, they continue to put BILLIONS into a failing school system, put even more BILLIONS into the pockets of tax-cheats, etc and this is what they do? Attack those in the private sector? I am not surprised that investors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;assist&#8221; with the census, they continue to put BILLIONS into a failing school system, put even more BILLIONS into the pockets of tax-cheats, etc and this is what they do? Attack those in the private sector? I am not surprised that investors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vsatt</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653847</link>
		<dc:creator>vsatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653847</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack Obama picked North Carolina to defeat Louisville for the NCAA championship, a relatively safe selection for a trailblazing president.

Obama spent part of Tuesday making his tournament picks for ESPN, which posted his completed bracket online Wednesday and showed the First Fan filling it out with Andy Katz on the noon edition of “Sportscenter.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Fantasy economics, fantasy basketball, it&#039;s all the same to him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Barack Obama picked North Carolina to defeat Louisville for the NCAA championship, a relatively safe selection for a trailblazing president.</p>
<p>Obama spent part of Tuesday making his tournament picks for ESPN, which posted his completed bracket online Wednesday and showed the First Fan filling it out with Andy Katz on the noon edition of “Sportscenter.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Fantasy economics, fantasy basketball, it&#8217;s all the same to him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torabora</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653821</link>
		<dc:creator>torabora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653821</guid>
		<description>How can you owe taxes (which means you made a profit) and need a bailout (which means you lost money)???????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you owe taxes (which means you made a profit) and need a bailout (which means you lost money)???????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: right_on</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653735</link>
		<dc:creator>right_on</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653735</guid>
		<description>Failure to pay taxes? Hmmmm...it fits a certain pattern, does it not?

Speaking of tax payments, I haven&#039;t seen nor heard anyone address &lt;strong&gt;property tax &lt;/strong&gt;payments that are&lt;strong&gt; owed by&lt;/strong&gt; those poor, unfortunate (and ignorant), in &lt;strong&gt;mortgage foreclosure&lt;/strong&gt;. How much more is owed to the various state governments by these &quot;oppressed&quot; homeowners?

In California, unless you are protected (more or less) by Proposition 13, your property tax billed by the state is onerous. Even with Prop 13, my property has doubled since it passed, but I still pay it on time.

&lt;strong&gt;Does bailing out those in foreclosure exonerate them from paying their fair share of state property tax&lt;/strong&gt;, or will the elected representatives hand out yet another perk at taxpayer (those of use who actually pay their taxes on time) expense, and &lt;strong&gt;waive said taxes&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;em&gt;in order to save the homeowner&lt;/em&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failure to pay taxes? Hmmmm&#8230;it fits a certain pattern, does it not?</p>
<p>Speaking of tax payments, I haven&#8217;t seen nor heard anyone address <strong>property tax </strong>payments that are<strong> owed by</strong> those poor, unfortunate (and ignorant), in <strong>mortgage foreclosure</strong>. How much more is owed to the various state governments by these &#8220;oppressed&#8221; homeowners?</p>
<p>In California, unless you are protected (more or less) by Proposition 13, your property tax billed by the state is onerous. Even with Prop 13, my property has doubled since it passed, but I still pay it on time.</p>
<p><strong>Does bailing out those in foreclosure exonerate them from paying their fair share of state property tax</strong>, or will the elected representatives hand out yet another perk at taxpayer (those of use who actually pay their taxes on time) expense, and <strong>waive said taxes</strong> <em>in order to save the homeowner</em>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happyscrapper</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/03/19/lovely-13-bailout-recipients-owe-220-million-in-back-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-653719</link>
		<dc:creator>happyscrapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=24973#comment-653719</guid>
		<description>On his show today, Rush said he hoped  those who got the bonuses and are now being targeted by Congress ALL voted for Obama, so they can see first hand what they have done!  I kinda doubt that people in that income bracket voted for Obama, but maybe a few of them did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his show today, Rush said he hoped  those who got the bonuses and are now being targeted by Congress ALL voted for Obama, so they can see first hand what they have done!  I kinda doubt that people in that income bracket voted for Obama, but maybe a few of them did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- NEW -->
