And so, it has come to pass…

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 24, 2009 10:43 PM

October 23, 2008: “New York Times bonds near junk territory…Anyone smelling a bailout plea coming on?”

November 11, 2008: “The newspaper bailout countdown clock: I think it’s time to start the newspaper bailout countdown clock. A few weeks ago, I joked that it wouldn’t be long until the junky New York Times started crawling to the government for a handout. Now, with the Fed waving its magic wand and redefining American Express as a “bank holding company,” with insurers and Hollywood getting a cut of the Crap Sandwich 2.0, with indebted state governments looking for help, and with China lobbying and with automakers poised to get a bigger piece of the action, my joke isn’t so funny anymore.”

December 1, 2008: “The newspaper bailout countdown clock: It’s here! Back in October, I joked that it wouldn’t be long before the junk-bond New York Times was lining up for a government bailout. Last month, I followed up with the launch of the Newspaper Bailout Countdown Clock in a post about Tribune Media’s financial woes. Well, it has come to pass: Democrats have proposed a newspaper bailout in Connecticut…”

December 3, 2008: New moochers in town: Newspapers.

January 1, 2009: First “See, I told you so” post of 2009! “I launched the Newspaper Bailout Countdown Clock on Nov. 11, reported on Connecticut’s move to prop up ailing dead-tree dailies on Dec. 1, and followed up with a column on the coming government rescues for the MSM on Dec. 3. And now, here comes Reuters, heralding the new year with this: Government aid could save U.S. newspapers, spark debate.”

March 24, 2009:

With many U.S. newspapers struggling to survive, a Democratic senator on Tuesday introduced a bill to help them by allowing newspaper companies to restructure as nonprofits with a variety of tax breaks.

“This may not be the optimal choice for some major newspapers or corporate media chains but it should be an option for many newspapers that are struggling to stay afloat,” said Senator Benjamin Cardin.

A Cardin spokesman said the bill had yet to attract any co-sponsors, but had sparked plenty of interest within the media, which has seen plunging revenues and many journalist layoffs.

Cardin’s Newspaper Revitalization Act would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits for educational purposes under the U.S. tax code, giving them a similar status to public broadcasting companies.

Under this arrangement, newspapers would still be free to report on all issues, including political campaigns. But they would be prohibited from making political endorsements.

Advertising and subscription revenue would be tax exempt, and contributions to support news coverage or operations could be tax deductible.

Voila: The Fishwrap Rescue and Recovery Act of 2009.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: New York Times

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On March 25th, 2009 at 6:18 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    Chap is right about ads in and subscriptions to non-profit publications not being tax deductible. There are many non-profit publications–such as National Geographic–and the cost of the magazine itself is not tax deductible and neither are the cost of ads. Usually you don’t “subscribe” to a non-profit publication…you pay to become a member of their organization and the publication is provided to you as a benefit of membership. At the most basic membership level, the “benefits” you receive equal the amount paid and you get no tax deduction. As you move into the higher membership categories the value of the benefits you receive goes up, but some portion of the membership price is deductible.

    If newspapers DO end up being treated as non-profits (horrible idea!!!), you will start getting some very, very funny junk mail–newspapers asking you to please subscribe at higher levels to help support their educational mission!!! LOL

  2. #102
    On March 25th, 2009 at 6:21 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    On March 25th, 2009 at 8:59 am, jangar said:

    Thanks jangar. It’s always nice to know someone read your post.

  3. #103
    On March 25th, 2009 at 6:53 pm, MuscleDaddy said:

    …as if they couldn’t already count-the-reasons to worship The One…

    – MuscleDaddy

  4. #104
    On March 26th, 2009 at 3:33 pm, 2cents said:

    State-run newspapers? How is this news? They are already the propaganda mouthpiece for the Obama administration, so this really won’t be much of a change. The only difference is that it’ll be compelled rather than voluntary; quite frankly, I think the voluntary is worse since they can still claim (though falsely) that they’re objective. At least once they’re officially state-run, they’ll lose that argument.

  5. #105
    On March 26th, 2009 at 10:13 pm, Stillwaiting said:

    Non-profit does not equal state-run.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Lib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release

December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

31 Comments

Fishwrap of Record’s resident sap confesses

September 20, 2011 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

88 Comments

Faith and the Fishwrap of Record

August 25, 2011 05:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

157 Comments

Four New York Times journalists missing in Libya

March 16, 2011 04:22 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments

The blabbermouth media strikes again

July 26, 2010 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin

120 Comments


Categories: New York Times

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook