And so, it has come to pass…

October 23, 2008: “New York Times bonds near junk territory…Anyone smelling a bailout plea coming on?”
November 11, 2008: “The newspaper bailout countdown clock: I think it’s time to start the newspaper bailout countdown clock. A few weeks ago, I joked that it wouldn’t be long until the junky New York Times started crawling to the government for a handout. Now, with the Fed waving its magic wand and redefining American Express as a “bank holding company,” with insurers and Hollywood getting a cut of the Crap Sandwich 2.0, with indebted state governments looking for help, and with China lobbying and with automakers poised to get a bigger piece of the action, my joke isn’t so funny anymore.”
December 1, 2008: “The newspaper bailout countdown clock: It’s here! Back in October, I joked that it wouldn’t be long before the junk-bond New York Times was lining up for a government bailout. Last month, I followed up with the launch of the Newspaper Bailout Countdown Clock in a post about Tribune Media’s financial woes. Well, it has come to pass: Democrats have proposed a newspaper bailout in Connecticut…”
December 3, 2008: New moochers in town: Newspapers.
January 1, 2009: First “See, I told you so” post of 2009! “I launched the Newspaper Bailout Countdown Clock on Nov. 11, reported on Connecticut’s move to prop up ailing dead-tree dailies on Dec. 1, and followed up with a column on the coming government rescues for the MSM on Dec. 3. And now, here comes Reuters, heralding the new year with this: Government aid could save U.S. newspapers, spark debate.”
With many U.S. newspapers struggling to survive, a Democratic senator on Tuesday introduced a bill to help them by allowing newspaper companies to restructure as nonprofits with a variety of tax breaks.
“This may not be the optimal choice for some major newspapers or corporate media chains but it should be an option for many newspapers that are struggling to stay afloat,” said Senator Benjamin Cardin.
A Cardin spokesman said the bill had yet to attract any co-sponsors, but had sparked plenty of interest within the media, which has seen plunging revenues and many journalist layoffs.
Cardin’s Newspaper Revitalization Act would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits for educational purposes under the U.S. tax code, giving them a similar status to public broadcasting companies.
Under this arrangement, newspapers would still be free to report on all issues, including political campaigns. But they would be prohibited from making political endorsements.
Advertising and subscription revenue would be tax exempt, and contributions to support news coverage or operations could be tax deductible.
Voila: The Fishwrap Rescue and Recovery Act of 2009.
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The abysmal incompetence of the non-Romneys; Huntsman, Gingrich, Perry all go Occupier; Santorum declines
January 9, 2012 10:36 AM by Michelle Malkin
370 CommentsLib media journos punked by fake SEIU press release
December 7, 2011 09:41 AM by Michelle Malkin
31 CommentsCharge: Fishwrap of Record virtually outed Sandusky rape victim
November 30, 2011 01:27 PM by Michelle Malkin
32 CommentsFishwrap of Record’s resident sap confesses
September 20, 2011 09:44 AM by Michelle Malkin
88 CommentsHow to ‘Green’ Your 4th of July (Take Note, Right Wing Revelers)
July 1, 2011 04:38 PM by Doug Powers
119 CommentsFour New York Times journalists missing in Libya
March 16, 2011 04:22 PM by Michelle Malkin
101 CommentsStop the hate campaign against law-abiding American businesses
February 2, 2011 04:03 AM by Michelle Malkin
244 CommentsThe blabbermouth media strikes again
July 26, 2010 09:20 AM by Michelle Malkin
120 Comments
Categories: New York Times
Patterico
» Rick Santorum and the two playbooks


Pundit & Pundette
» King Barack vs. the Nonconformists
JustOneMinute
» Cat Blogging In A Harsh New Light

NRO
» The Church of Obama










Chap is right about ads in and subscriptions to non-profit publications not being tax deductible. There are many non-profit publications–such as National Geographic–and the cost of the magazine itself is not tax deductible and neither are the cost of ads. Usually you don’t “subscribe” to a non-profit publication…you pay to become a member of their organization and the publication is provided to you as a benefit of membership. At the most basic membership level, the “benefits” you receive equal the amount paid and you get no tax deduction. As you move into the higher membership categories the value of the benefits you receive goes up, but some portion of the membership price is deductible.
If newspapers DO end up being treated as non-profits (horrible idea!!!), you will start getting some very, very funny junk mail–newspapers asking you to please subscribe at higher levels to help support their educational mission!!! LOL
Thanks jangar. It’s always nice to know someone read your post.
…as if they couldn’t already count-the-reasons to worship The One…
– MuscleDaddy
State-run newspapers? How is this news? They are already the propaganda mouthpiece for the Obama administration, so this really won’t be much of a change. The only difference is that it’ll be compelled rather than voluntary; quite frankly, I think the voluntary is worse since they can still claim (though falsely) that they’re objective. At least once they’re officially state-run, they’ll lose that argument.
Non-profit does not equal state-run.