To GIVE and to SERVE: the $6 billion National Service boondoggle
My syndicated column today looks at the massive expansion of government-funded “national service.” Debate began yesterday in the Senate, where the $6 billion SERVE Act’s primary co-sponsors are Sens. Ted Kennedy and…Orrin Hatch. And there’s the rub. Since its inception, AmeriCorps has been a bipartisan-supported beast. The Evil Party and the Stupid Party strike again. If this does lead to the establishment of a civilian national security force, as Obama signaled during the campaign, Republicans who vote for this Trojan Horse will have no one to blame but themselves.
***
To GIVE and to SERVE: The $6 billion National Service boondoggle
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2009
Maybe it’s just me, but I find federal legislation titled “The GIVE Act” and “The SERVE Act” downright creepy. Even more troubling: The $6 billion price tag on these bipartisan bills to expand government-funded national service efforts. Volunteerism is a wonderful thing, which is why millions of Americans do it every day without a cent of taxpayer money. But the volunteerism packages on the Hill are less about promoting effective charity than about creating make-work, permanent bureaucracies, and left-wing slush funds.
The House passed the “Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act” – or the GIVE Act – last week. The Senate took up the companion “SERVE Act” Tuesday afternoon. According to a Congressional Budget Office analysis of the Senate bill, S. 277, the bill would cost “$418 million in 2010 and about $5.7 billion over the 2010-2014 period.” And like most federal programs, these would be sure to grow over time. The bills reauthorize the Clinton-era Americorps boondoggle program and an older law, the Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973.
The programs have already been allocated $1.1 billion for fiscal 2009, including $200 million from the porkulus package signed into law last month. In addition to recruiting up to 250,000 enrollees in AmeriCorps, the GIVE/SERVE bills would create new little armies of government volunteers, including a Clean Energy Corps, Education Corps, Healthy Futures Corps, Veterans Service Corps, and and expanded National Civilian Community Corps for disaster relief and energy conservation. And that’s not all. Spending would include new funds for:
*Foster Grandparent Program ($115 million);
*Learn and Serve America. ($97 million);
*Retired and Senior Volunteer Program ($70 million);
*Senior Companion Program ($55 million);
*$12 million for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 for “the Silver Scholarships and Encore Fellowships programs;”
*$10 million a year from 2010-2014 for a new “Volunteers for Prosperity” program at USAID to “award grants to fund opportunities for volunteering internationally
in coordination with eligible organizations; and
*Social Innovation Fund and Volunteer Generation Fund-$50 million in 2010; $60 million in 2011; $70 million in 2012; $80 million in 2013; and $100 million in 2014.
“Social Innovation Fund?” If that sounds familiar, it should. I reported last fall on the Democratic Party platform’s push to fund a “Social Investment Fund Network” that would reward “social entrepreneurs and leading nonprofit organizations” and “support results-oriented innovators.” It is essentially a special taxpayer-funded pipeline for radical liberal groups backed by billionaire George Soros that masquerade as public-interest do-gooders.
Especially troublesome to parents’ groups concerned about compulsory volunteerism requirements is a provision in the House version, directing Congress to explore “whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds.”
Those who have watched AmeriCorps from its inception are all-too-familiar with how government voluntarism programs have been used for propaganda and political purposes. AmeriCorps “volunteers” have been put to work lobbying against the voter-approved three-strikes anti-crime initiative in California and protesting Republican political events while working for the already heavily-tax-subsidized liberal advocacy group ACORN.
Citizens Against Government Waste, the D.C. watchdog, also documented national service volunteers lobbying for rent control, expanded federal housing subsidies, and enrollment of more women in the Women, Infants, and Children welfare program. AmeriCorps volunteers have also been paid to shuffle paper at the Department of Justice, the Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Legal Services Corporation, and the National Endowment for the Arts.
(Now, imagine Obama’s troops being sent overseas – out of sight and unaccountable — as part of that $10 million a year USAID/”Volunteers for Prosperity” program. Egad.)
One vigilant House member, GOP Rep. Virginia Foxx, successfully attached an amendment to the GIVE Act to bar National Service recipients from engaging in political lobbying, endorsing or opposing legislation, organizing petitions, protests, boycotts, or strikes; providing or promoting abortions or referrals; or influencing union organizing.
Supporters of GIVE/SERVE are now fighting those restrictions tooth and nail, screaming censorship and demanding that the provisions be dropped. Which tells you everything you need to know about the true nature of this boondoggle: Taxpayers GIVE their money to SERVE a big government agenda under the guise of helping their fellow man. It’s charity at the point of a gun.
***
Don’t know why, but the creepy title of the Senate bill reminds me of that classic Twilight Zone episode, “To Serve Man.” Remember?
See what others have said
Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
 |
Stammertime: Jay Carney asked if Chicago protests have soured Obama’s support for OWS
May 23, 2012 07:44 PM by Doug Powers
31 Comments
Biden: Tea Party stopped us from growing the economy
May 23, 2012 01:55 PM by Doug Powers
41 Comments
Catholic lawsuit against Obamacare mandate cites 1993 legislation written by Ted Kennedy and Chuck Schumer
May 22, 2012 04:35 PM by Doug Powers
48 Comments
Biden: Hey, I don’t blame people for voting for a convicted felon instead of my boss
May 18, 2012 01:21 PM by Doug Powers
73 Comments
Senate narrowly votes down Obama budget
May 16, 2012 06:09 PM by Doug Powers
47 CommentsTransparency update: Donors told to hand over cell phones upon entering Obama fundraisers
May 15, 2012 04:40 PM by Doug Powers
42 Comments
#ObamaInHistory
May 15, 2012 12:29 PM by Michelle Malkin
122 Comments
Categories: Barack Obama,National Service
Twitchy
» Sean Combs brags about spending millions on strippers; Photographer replies: ‘#payyourbillsdiddy’American Thinker
» Fun & Games with Mainstream Media NumbersRedstate
» Bomber Turned Left Wing Activist, Brett Kimberlin, Tries to Silence Conservative Oppositionprotein wisdom
» Hey, Barry … who is this “we” you speak of? [Darleen Click]Twitchy
» Weaponized misogyny: Hustler punishes S.E. Cupp for pro-life views with explicit fake imageTwitchy
» Roseanne Barr: Defending S.E. Cupp is more disgusting than Photoshopping a penis in her mouthBetsys Page
» Cruising the Web
By using the nickname feature and “display name publicly as” feature.
The Bill of Rights also guarantees the right to own and bear arms. I ask (in my best Dr Phil voice) “How is that working out for you?”
These Community Security Forces are the ones who will come for your guns- it will not be the military by and large. Most I believe will resign and join forces with the rebels. (Civil War History 101) I predict a different outcome.
It was Voluntary. Everyone owes the Nation something but Obama has not given The Nation anything but anything but Lip Service, higher Taxes and fear about what quasi-legal monkey business will pop up next.
I don’t see how that’s related to Americorp, and it’s not like the guy followed voters into the booth. I’m not saying I’m okay with it, mind you, but I’ve seen politicking too close to voting sites numerous times in democrat held cities. This might have been a more extreme example given the man’s affiliation, but I see it as no different that the supporters who hand out flyers at the school doors where voting is held. MY calling and complaining hasn’t made a difference there, either. —my point is, that this is not unique to Obama, but rather a phenomena that is seen is democrat strongholds.
Again, I need to reiterate that I don’t support Americorp, I think it’s a worthless program. But my experience with the program shows that they don’t have the wherewithal to do much.
I don’t disagree with that. But it was never really volunteerism to begin with, as the people got paid. AS far as it being a string attachement ona gov’t loan, it sucks, but you don’t have to take it, and chances are you’ll accmplish nothing over a three month period anyway.
One of the big problems with the program(in terms of it’s efficacy) is that you can’t take systemic neighborhood problems that have persisted for decades, insert a random stranger in a “helping role” for a few months and expect them to do anything.
This may or may not be true, but consider that a few weeks back there was a news article about how the govt was considering saving money in the public education system by cutting the number of school days from 5 to 4.
This would cause a huge amount of pressure for working parents as they’d have one day a week in which their children would have nothing to do.
My prediction: We’ll see the 4 day school week, and the 5th day problem will be resolved with a day of direct indoctrination.
Gun owners will not put up with this. This will be the last straw that sparks the next revolution.
Do you seriously think that they don’t? If one of them wants it, it’ll be in there, no matter what.
The usual leftist argument. One set of rules for me, another for thee.
Wrong – they hate us both because we have dictionaries and *KNOW* what the word volunteer really means – service on behalf of other people in the name of the Creator for nothing tangible.
Called Feinstein and Boxer and registered my extreme displeasure of the pending legislature. Not that I think they will take it under advisement, they are Senate lifers after all, but I am still an American and my cell phone was in the mood. It got a little feisty after hearing about TOTUS’s adventures last night.
Hold on a minute there cowboy. What exactly is not true?
She wrote that a provision of the bill is troublesome to parents concerned about compulsory service. She didn’t say that it was or was not in the bill that passed. Only that it was present in the bill and was a concern.
The issue is… that it was there at all. And since it was there… it’s likely if not certain to be brought back in. So that’s a concern for parents. The content of the final house bill isn’t the point. It’s what the democrats in congress are attempting to do.
We all know how much safer Chicago is after the Community Organizer in Chief did his part. You are actually safer in Baghdad than Chicago, Detroit or DC.
If I write that a very controversial provision is in a bill when it really isn’t, feel free to call me out on it.
Do YOU want to take my bet? If that provision is in there when the bill is signed, I will change my screen name for a month to whatever you want. If not, I can change yours.
Term Limits … NOW!!!!
Not so much. Voluntary by definition is not mandatory. “Service” by itself does not imply either.
My definition of is, is is.
I’m not sure how this made it into the thread, but it would be an ill-advised venture to attempt to enter my home to confiscate legally possessed weapons.
Its not present in the bill. Those previous versions are meaningless.
Jeez. She was wrong. She made a mistake. Just accept it, people.
Upon suspension of the Bill of Rights, my personal Rules of Engagement apply on my property.
Otherwise my No Trespassing signs apply.
My kids are all in agreement that Mr Obama can go have sexual relations with himslef.
Two examples why this is a bad idea:
) When in the military, kids quickly discovered that smoking was the best way to get out of work. About 50 times a day, all of them would leave the workspace to go for a smoke, leaving myself and one or two other guys to do actual work. I finally just got to where as soon as they left, I would kick back and stop my work until they returned.
) People with really nice cars should never ever ever never take up two parking spaces in order to protect their paint job. When the kids were younger, it became a fun little family game, where when we found a car taking up more than its share, I would turn the kids loose in the parking lot to do what they wanted to do, as I walked into a store. And my kids arent even hoodlums. They are just Abercrombie and Fitch/Hollister/Hot Topic suburban preppies that hate preppies. Just think what the real hoodlums will be doing.
Lets just wait for the Final Product. Obama promised to post it on his .gov website 5 days prior to any action. Like he promised not to hire any Lobbyists. Hah!
Looks to me like Michelle was either punked by the source or was not able to revise the pre-written article after a newer version was passed.
Perhaps the Senate will add the paragraph to their version of the bill, who knows?
The bill’s language is a concern nonetheless.
Wow, you’re getting all upset again. Why are you obsessing on such a trivial point? If she’s wrong, I’m sure she’ll issue a correction in a month or two on page 46 of the classifieds, like the NY Times.
His brother isn’t homeless, he lives in a shack. The D’oh cannot be concerned with a few raindrops splashing inside the place once in a while. Plus, they’ve been having a drought. He’s dry.
/sarc off
Then PLEASE take it up DIRECTLY WITH MICHELLE for crying out loud! Her email is on her contact page, and she’s usually pretty good at responding. Give it a freaking rest, chaffepowder!
Call me crazy, but I don’t feel obligated to believe obama nor the congressional dems will EVER DO THE RIGHT THING and PRESERVE OUR FREEDOMS. Their record so far dictates they want to take our freedoms (and money) to feed “the common good”.
You like socialism/communism so much? Fine. There are many dictatorships/3rd world nations you can choose from to move to. Leave America alone.
hahahahaha!
thanks chap!
what?
Elections have consequences.
Sigh.
hmmm; it doesn’t let me post anything under a new ‘nickname’.
CHAP: Thanks for reminding us on how we can change our screen names.
I’ve been wanting to do that since I moved back from CA from CO.
tam
You think that provision is trivial?
MM doesn’t. She calls it “especially troublesome.” I think it is very important that she is misinforming people, telling them that there is a provision that could lead to mandatory service when there is not. Isn’t that what 90% of the comments are bitching about?
Hello. She already is wrong. She is claiming that the provision is in the bill. It is not.
The bootlicking here is amazing.
Thanks CHAP, wanted to do that for a while.
NJ – Simply pass a law that makes those weapons illegal. Simple, no? Something along the lines of…. they aren’t registered in the federal registry, didn’t have the annual inspection, when the inspector went to NJ Aviator’s home for the purpose of inspecting the registered firearms, he was denied entry.
Now they are no longer legally possessed weapons, are they? No. Now you are a felon.
House Bill 45
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45/show
Sponsored by Rep Bobby Rush (D) IL
This is the same Bobby Rush who went AWOL from the US Army to found a chapter of the Black Panthers, and was convicted, sentenced, and served 6 months for illegal weapons possession (I haven’t found the details on that yet).
In fairness, I don’t think Rep Rush is 100% bad, he does protest the genocide in Sudan.
We already have a civilian national security force. It is described in Title 10, Chapter 13, USC.
The best part is that it doesn’t require funding, thanks to the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
Hope is not a plan; not all change is good. The resistance is here; the resistance is now.
ECS
You do not seriously believe NO ONE will intervene? No offense but that would be naive. One of his disciples will take it upon themselves to hook her up. Then he can claim ignorance.(he always could in my opinion).
On March 25th, 2009 at 10:47 am,
Remember the kid in The Sound of Music who loved the Von Trapp girl? He was in Hitler’s youth corps and ended up betraying the Von Trapps even though he was in love with the girl. He was brainwashed into doing the bidding of his leader. This is no stretch at all. This particular history is very very close to repeating itself!
You think its trivial? MM does not. She thinks its “especially troublesome.” Aren’t 75% of the comments here whining about some mandatory service requirement that doesn’t exist?
She is wrong. There is no “if.” She says the bill contains the provision. It does not.
The bootlicking here is amazing.
When the provision reappears, my vote for Chap’s new nickname is: AsslessChaps.
I don’t have a big problem with volunteer service of many forms. I was a Peace Corps volunteer over 10 years ago, and, by and large, it made me the staunch conservative I am. I finally began to realize what utter incompetence and corruption rackets the whole industry is. And it truly is an industry racket.
Unfortunately, many liberals who go into these programs come out the same liberals they went in as, and it never dawns on them that the people they’re supposed to be trying to help have to solve their own problems to make any real CHANGE in their lives. The intention is to make people independent, but that rarely happens, it turns into a governmental paternalism problem instead. The main way people are ultimately helped is that they need to be forced to literally sink (starve) or swim (succeed) on their own. Most people, like teens kicked out of the house, ultimately make it on their own, and if they don’t or won’t, they CHOOSE to become failures. The never ending program here and there merely postpones the independence of the people you are trying to help. And why not be a slug if someone else will foot the bill?
I’ve rarely seen volunteers with the skills to actually help people out anyway. It’s a real world indictment of the university system, but don’t tell that to the liberals. You can come out of the university system, in debt up to your eyeballs, and with few, if any, real skills needed to help the very people who will, uneducated, will teach you more how to get along than any college professor could. Worse, the university system leaves you arrogant and thinking you have all the answers, when you’re a complete dope anyway.
I’d like to see interns working alongside entrepeneurs who, real world, have to put together a business and run it, pay a payroll and taxes and put a real product out. What an education that would be for the intern volunteer. Then they can go out and help the next business guy. A volunteer corps for business. Yep, some could be volunteers for the disabled etc who really need the hand (like war veterans, that might just impress upon the volunteer the real sacrifices the veteran made to his country). But, most of this will never happen, because the rackets are more there for reinforcing the liberal mindset than for breaking the liberal mindset, as it did for me.
Last, these poor volunteers are going to be promised their service is going to be a big thing on their resume, when in fact, nobody out there in the real world gives a rat’s behind that you served, they only want someone with the skills to do the job they’re providing you. Volunteering is never a complete waste of time, but it doesn’t entitle you to a job afterward.
It won’t matter whether its constitutional or not. Obama , along with a completely ignorant group of his politically correct army of paid volunteers established in each community.
In Russia and Red China they were called block bosses.
They’re paid by tax dollars, favored for government jobs, or when it gets really bad front line privileges for the best protein.
Sorta like your neighbor than shows up with a demand and a lead pipe. ( read Mafia, Union Boss, or weasel)(no disrespect to weasels).
This is criminal, insidious,and goes against every principle of freedom.
Make no mistake. This is a very real possibility.
It happened like that under Lenin, Stalin,Mao, Castro, and Chavez.
There is a reason why Che posters are all over the Obama campaign.
This needs to be fought.
David check the Ka Bar.
“The SERVE Act…it’s a cookbook!”
Sounds snappy, except for the fact this person is 100% ass. How about if we just go with “OneBigAss”, and leave it at that?
Agreed, the unknown issue, to me at least, is whose command I/we would fall under. The first thing the sissy politicians in IL, where I live, would want to try and lock my weapons up in an armory someplace. That’s a serious issue, because i am sure that would be the first thing they try to do if a militia comes out into the open.
Forced compulsory service would be next.
No way will they do anything to encourage parents to stay home with their kids, that’s for sure.
The administration is also looking at a year-round school calendar, and more government funded “early childhood education” programs.
Scary, scary stuff.
That is the God’s truth!
I worked for a while in my state government where there were a sprinkling of these “volunteers” assigned. They had no skills and no one wanted them. They were given desks and tucked into out-of-the-way niches.
Some spent their days playing video games. Others simply managed their personal lives and surfed the web. Still others spent their time in “giving back,” with leftwing activism, to the power structure that put them in these idle positions.
Advice to young people: If you really want to contribute, to make a difference yada yada, there is one really great way to do it: GO OUT AND GET A PRODUCTIVE JOB, SUPPORT YOURSELF, PAY TAXES, AND SUPPLY PRODUCTS AND SERVICES THAT YOUR FELLOW CITIZENS ACTUALLY WANT AND ARE WILLING TO PAY FOR.
Of course – Rolf. He had a whistle.
And Obama is funding abortions for his girlfriends again, right?
Good Lord, you don’t actually expect words to mean anything, do you? (HUGE SARCASM HERE for those who don’t pick up on it!)
I fully expect Obama to roll it out as a voluntary service, and then school systems to promote that as their only choice in a mandatory graduation requirement.
Some people only look at the law.
Others look ahead to how it will be applied.
Changed my nickname from Jeff2161
posting under new nickname…
I don’t think that’s neccesary. Chap is entitled to his opinion and is usually able to state it without mean personal attacks. I often enjoy his posts.
Linky:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s111-277
I’m sure everyone in the House and Senate read the entire thing before voting.
I will change it to whatever no matter how silly, nasty or degrading, so long as it does not violate the terms of use.
83 Republicans voted for this, two fewer than for the AIG bonus confiscation.
It may be interesting to compare the two lists; we probably now have a working list of RINO capitulators to the Obamabots.
Republicans Voting ‘Aye’
Name Voted
Rep. Steve Austria [R, OH-7] Aye
Rep. Spencer Bachus [R, AL-6] Aye
Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6] Aye
Rep. Judy Biggert [R, IL-13] Aye
Rep. Gus Bilirakis [R, FL-9] Aye
Rep. Mary Bono Mack [R, CA-45] Aye
Rep. Henry Brown [R, SC-1] Aye
Rep. Virginia Brown-Waite [R, FL-5] Aye
Rep. Vern Buchanan [R, FL-13] Aye
Rep. Michael Burgess [R, TX-26] Aye
Rep. Ken Calvert [R, CA-44] Aye
Rep. David Camp [R, MI-4] Aye
Rep. Anh Cao [R, LA-2] Aye
Rep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2] Aye
Rep. Bill Cassidy [R, LA-6] Aye
Rep. Michael Castle [R, DE-0] Aye
Rep. Jason Chaffetz [R, UT-3] Aye
Rep. Mike Coffman [R, CO-6] Aye
Rep. Tom Cole [R, OK-4] Aye
Rep. Ander Crenshaw [R, FL-4] Aye
Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15] Aye
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart [R, FL-25] Aye
Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart [R, FL-21] Aye
Rep. David Dreier [R, CA-26] Aye
Rep. Vernon Ehlers [R, MI-3] Aye
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson [R, MO-8] Aye
Rep. Mary Fallin [R, OK-5] Aye
Rep. Jeffrey Fortenberry [R, NE-1] Aye
Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen [R, NJ-11] Aye
Rep. Elton Gallegly [R, CA-24] Aye
Rep. Jim Gerlach [R, PA-6] Aye
Rep. Brett Guthrie [R, KY-2] Aye
Rep. Dean Heller [R, NV-2] Aye
Rep. Timothy Johnson [R, IL-15] Aye
Rep. Peter King [R, NY-3] Aye
Rep. Leonard Lance [R, NJ-7] Aye
Rep. Steven LaTourette [R, OH-14] Aye
Rep. Christopher Lee [R, NY-26] Aye
Rep. Jerry Lewis [R, CA-41] Aye
Rep. Frank LoBiondo [R, NJ-2] Aye
Rep. Frank Lucas [R, OK-3] Aye
Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer [R, MO-9] Aye
Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3] Aye
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10] Aye
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter [R, MI-11] Aye
Rep. Patrick Mchenry [R, NC-10] Aye
Rep. John McHugh [R, NY-23] Aye
Rep. Howard McKeon [R, CA-25] Aye
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [R, WA-5] Aye
Rep. Candice Miller [R, MI-10] Aye
Rep. Tim Murphy [R, PA-18] Aye
Rep. Sue Myrick [R, NC-9] Aye
Rep. Erik Paulsen [R, MN-3] Aye
Rep. Mike Pence [R, IN-6] Aye
Rep. Thomas Petri [R, WI-6] Aye
Rep. Joseph Pitts [R, PA-16] Aye
Rep. Todd Platts [R, PA-19] Aye
Rep. Adam Putnam [R, FL-12] Aye
Rep. Dennis Rehberg [R, MT-0] Aye
Rep. Dave Reichert [R, WA-8] Aye
Rep. David Roe [R, TN-1] Aye
Rep. Michael Rogers [R, MI-8] Aye
Rep. Harold Rogers [R, KY-5] Aye
Rep. Thomas Rooney [R, FL-16] Aye
Rep. Peter Roskam [R, IL-6] Aye
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R, FL-18] Aye
Rep. Steve Scalise [R, LA-1] Aye
Rep. Aaron Schock [R, IL-18] Aye
Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19] Aye
Rep. Christopher Smith [R, NJ-4] Aye
Rep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21] Aye
Rep. Adrian Smith [R, NE-3] Aye
Rep. Lee Terry [R, NE-2] Aye
Rep. Glenn Thompson [R, PA-5] Aye
Rep. Patrick Tiberi [R, OH-12] Aye
Rep. Michael Turner [R, OH-3] Aye
Rep. Frederick Upton [R, MI-6] Aye
Rep. Greg Walden [R, OR-2] Aye
Rep. Zach Wamp [R, TN-3] Aye
Rep. Edward Whitfield [R, KY-1] Aye
Rep. Rob Wittman [R, VA-1] Aye
Rep. Frank Wolf [R, VA-10] Aye
Rep. Donald Young [R, AK-0] Aye
I dont know, if true, we’ll have to see how this turns out.
Several years ago I talked with one of the Secret Service agents that was on the detail where the Bush twins were busted for underage drinking.
When I asked why he didnt use the power of the Secret Service to save them, he said that President Bush explicitly ordered the Secret Service to never be involved in the twins private matters. The girls had to make their own mistakes and learn their own lessons.
Then again, that was Bush not BO, so who knows….. lol OK we know whats going to happen……
yeah; esp. since he told me how to change my screen name…even tho’ I can’t do it right…
It’s called “service learning” and schools have been doing it long before Obama.
Lets try this…
Here ya go. It can be done.
hmmmm…
huh
see wight.
It can be done.
Problem with comments?
They will be called the New Young Pioneers. First it will start out in a scouting type atmosphere and progress, thats termed loosely,to a full fledged movement. This will encompass the Youth Camp thing where all, YOUTH, will stay the summer doing various good deeds for the public. Of course the leftist view of the world will be shared with those gullible YOUTH.
Lets try this again.
Can’t post comments with nickname?
There we go. See.
I was having the same problem as wright, CHAP.
Odd. I used to post on occasion under l’il seige, using the nickname thing, to tweak the original undrseige. But now it appears you can’t do it.
So I guess the bet is moot.
“Creepy” was being kind Michelle.
In my high school, we had a “careers” class to prepare us for the real world. Perhaps they will now have a “liberalism” class to teach our youth how to vote properly.
The civilian force can be the hammer to keep our youth and elders on the right path so they don’t stray to the evil republican side that doesn’t care about children, or the environment, or immigrants, or poor people, or people of color, or fairness.
In fact, I don’t need my beatdown, I can now clearly see that Republicans only care about making a buck, no matter who they step on to get it. Thats all they care about. But wait, they don’t like to kill innocent unborn children. Maybe they aren’t all bad. No wait, anti abortion means no choice for those mothers. I am confused. Maybe this volunteer force can steer me to the correct
indoctrinationtraining classes.1st period- Fuzzy Math 1+1
2nd period- Spanglish 10uno
3rd period- Liberalism 1toall
Lunch- free to all, paid for by rich
4th period- Revisionist History 1=2
5th period- Climate Change Science 98.6
6th period- Activism 1on1
Homework- write your own manifesto.
It works
-~Taylork
test
works for me
My view of the obama white house.
It cannot be denied that socialism/communism/fascism is on the march in the United States.
God be with us through these tribulations.
RWR
http://www.rightwingrocker.com
Why doesn’t the federal government just bring back slavery and cut out the middle man altogether?
I don’t care who you are, the government cannot make anybody volunteer or serve the will of the Government. As a teacher, I was skeptical at certain curriculum “mandates” that require high school seniors to “volunteer” to graduate. We graduated kids decades ago who were smarter and knew more about their country who never had to volunteer to graduate.
This smacks of government intrusion and is anti-American. Next, they’ll make “forced volunteership/servitude” a component of citizenship just to stay in the country.
This government is outta control. Republicans who still have their spines need to steer clear of this legislation.
Congress never considers the Law of Unintended Consequences.
A military draft is one thing. Manadatory service is another. If participation in this program becomes “mandatory” just wait until the first draftee “community volunteer” gets assualted, murdered or raped.
All hell will break loose. Mom and dad did not raise their kids to be sent by the State to Detroit and butchered. Wait till you see the children of the priviliged getting “deferments.” Wait till you see what are defferments and what are not. Like buying carbon credits or the Civil War draft the wealthy can buy their way out.
They make this service mandatory and the backlash will make these Congressman wish they chosen careers at McDonalds.
Volunteership does not make for a more cohesive, national fabric. These libs act like volunteering will make people feel like they’re on the same “team.” That volunteership can fill in all the gaps created by single parenting, poor parenting, decaying black communities, lack of responsibility, civic greed, and dependency.
This is just another government boondoggle that will grow outta control. Even JFK would roll in his grave if he saw this and he pushed for people to volunteer… just not on this level.
Dear Taylork,
And how many of those brochue givers were armed?
Rats…If someone could check the filter, I had linked to a Obama Support site and included some quotes from it, forgetting to read them for foul language, and I know there must have been at least one thing that didn’t pass the screen.
It is a pretty important post, so if it could get cleaned or cleared or whatever, I would appreciate it and will try to be more dilligent in the future about removing all the words.
I knew I was going to miss one.
It was from “The Obama Forum” and it listed quotes from such threads as “Post Enemy License Plates Here” meaning anyone who has Republican/anti-tax/anti-Obama stickers or paraphanalia on their cars in order to get a database begun “Just in case” and from the thread “Should We Declare War On White People” with responses such as “The white devil speeks with a forked toungue
Better start filling those sandbaggs inside your wooden shack Zeke….the Obama Army will show NO MERCY to your ilk ”
Then again, I included several links to such postings. It might not have been language but the linkage amount that got it tossed.
At any rate, hopefully Michelle or someone will rescue it and post it for me. I will try to be better about it in the future.
Oh, and it was in regards to the video that ErinF had posted. If you think that video and the one with the kids singing like Hitler Jungend and Mao’s Kids to their “Glorious Leader”, just follow the above link and prepare to be sick.
I have anti Obama stuff on my car. I hope they have my license plate…In their vernacular…Bring it!!!!!!!
Some of the pollworkers in my Philly ‘hood share their home with family members who are out on the street dealing drugs everyday, so I’m guessing it’s possible.
Besides, I would consider this equal intimidation, if not more intimidation against liberals. Why you ask?
–liberals are scared of guns, conservatives aren’t (besides of which is was a baton, the functional equivalent of a stick)
— The area where the black panther are is consists of mostly African Americans or Hispanicsliving in public or subsidized housing, not exactly where you’d find a bunch of conservative voters.
Here’s what we are to become
NYT Praises Russia’s “Citizen Volunteers”.
http://sweetness-light.com/
What is amazing is that we should take your “word” for it when Congress has done nothing so far to instill any trust in their “stewardship.” What is amazing is that you and many Obummer supporters think that the rest of us should give him a chance while he spends this country into bankruptcy. If there was a vote of no confidence in Congress like there was in the Czech Republic this past week, he’d already be gone.
BTW, many high schools require “volunteerism” whether or not the students want to volunteer. Kids aren’t allowed to think for themselves or decide what’s right for themselves, they’re “directed” to volunteer. As a teacher, I find this suspect since I’m supposed to teach kids how to think and decide what’s right for themselves, not the State.
If Obummer is so confident in the power of the State, why does he need people to “volunteer” for it and get goodies in return? Why is that? It’s been shown in the past, by MM, that these volunteers have been used for political causes, which contradicts the original purpose of their volunteership.
Obummer and the federal government is a danger to all of us. You would see that if you could get past this sick belief that what he says at news conferences actually matters. The world is burning and all you have to say is that MM put in a passage you find “untruthful” and “objectionable.”
When are you going to stand up against this crap as a tax-paying citizen, or have you already given your allegience to one-party socialism? Where are your priorities?
#162 The toy surgeon
Just from experience becareful about anti-obama stickers. I had an Nobama-No Socialism sticker on my window and the 1st vandalism was dog poop rubbed over sticker on the window the 2nd was flour thrown all over my car the 3rd and final was paint thinner thrown all over the car. $4000 worth of damage to repaint the car and it was a brand new BMW!
Just becareful!!!!!
The final version of the bill I read has it in there. And I went to the link you provided, and it gave me a search error. So please, CHAP, prove to me they removed the amendment by directly linking to the version that passed the House and show us where it was amended and/or removed.
twilight zone “To Serve Man”…that was a great episode…my kids in college says dear leader can go pound sand….
Don’t take my word for it. Go to thomas.loc.gov, search for “hr 1388″ and look at the text of the bill as passed. I would link to it directly but it doesn’t allow you to, as the search “runs out” or something.
Also, feel free to look at the version the Senate is considering.
Where did I say anything Obama said at the press conference actually mattered?
“I find” nothing. It is objectively false, and a very substantive error. I am not picking nits here. She is getting people all frothed up (the evidence for that is here) about a section of a bill that is not actually in the bill.
I am well aware. I had to do it to graduate. I found it distasteful.
Dear xler8bmw,
thanks for the advice..but i am not scared. there is a 45 hp with their name on it if they mess with me…We cannot cower from them and their distain of the law. Thats what they want to do. It will take obtuse laws to curb law into their favor. I live in the south, one of the last conservative strongholds. I will fight to the last breath.
Isn’t it amazing how many intolerant, immature idiots posing as adults are out there ready to tell the rest of us that we live “under their rule” now? This is no longer the land of the free as people like Chaps think. There are many rational Dems out there who would never pull such stunts yet when you tell them what the far-left fanatics do to shut up free speech, it’s all crickets.
While I love Colorado Springs (my husband was assigned there for 3 years) it isn’t the accepting bastion that many think it is. I worked for one of the public school districts as a sub and I had a yellow ribbon magnet on the back of my SUV to support the troops. It constantly got stolen, either by students, parents, or teachers. I’m not sure who. I went through at least 3 of those ribbons.
There’s just as much intolerance for military support as there is for anti-Obummer stickers. Ironic, isn’t it?
“IT’S A COOKBOOK!!!! A COOOOOOKBOOOOOOK!!”
Lets face it liberals,, you are not going to convince me of anything different, just like we cannot convince you of your blind faith in Obama and the double talk and smoke and mirrors he presents. He can disguise these social programs with meaningful titles, but a spade is still a spade. Obviously most of you don’t know diddly about history with your “gimme” mindset.. Its a waste of time to explain points to either side. Why you come to this site to stir it up is besides me, unless you are bored sitting with nothing to do in your crib. I wouldn’t want to even comment on those MSM sites. I would get banned anyway. Interesting that an anti-obama conservative gets banned for speaking his mind on a liberal website, but here on MM you liberals go unmolested. Hmmm. might have something here. Maybe we believe in the first amendment and you don’t.
As I said, the Thomas site (which is the one you should refer to because it is the official government site for legislation) doesn’t seem to allow it because the search times out. But go to thomas.loc.gov. Search under bill number hr 1388. Then click on “Text of Legislation.” Then click on version 3 of the bill, which is the engrossed and voted upon version of the bill. Then search to your heart’s desire for that language. It is not there.
The thing that makes a good volunteer is that the person doing it WANTS to volunteer. When you force people into community service and public service, what you get is a large section of the population that is incredibly resentful and will do a piss-poor job of whatever it is they are doing, as well as making everyone else…especially those that actually DIS volunteer and who want to be there, completely miserable.
There has already been an amazing amount of television commercials telling people to volunteer for all sorts of Obama’s pet projects. The big question is will they actually read this bill prior to the forced vote it is sure to go through and just how long before the compulsory “volunteerism” begins?
You can be damn sure that it will be a cold day in hell before I spend one second of my life volunteering for anything that Obama or his cronies find necessary.
Re-education camps will be filled with the same people I find to be wonderful people and true Americans, so it won’t be bad at all.
Is it or is it not in the final version? Which one is it?
This legislation is FORCING volunteerism, creating new federally-backed organizations accountable to no one, without restrictions, where these volunteers can be put to work doing ANYTHING that’s not related to the original goal of the volunteership. Furthermore, when you angle a return for volunteership, it’s no longer volunteership… it’s unpaid work with benefits.
Why does the federal government need to direct money in this manner? Why are they discouraging charity? Something doesn’t fit.
I was making a larger point that this man is a media creation and that he’s making all of these changes in a time where our economy is shakey and unstable. He’s using his Congressional cronies to push this legislation.
Please give us a REAL link to what is ACTUALLY in the bill. People are all “frothed up” over a bill that is directing our tax dollars to volunteer groups where the work is neither “voluntary” or it’s for political purposes to perpetuate a larger federal government. It isn’t one section of the bill people have problems with, it’s the ENTIRE bill.
The federal government has already shown that they’re pushing forward legislation that is intruding into the private lives of Americans in an unprecedented manner. It’s just not adults’ lives, it’s kids. Do you not have a problem with the inconsistencies that exist in this bill?
Yet you don’t find it “distasteful” that the federal government is now directing our tax dollars toward different volunteering opportunities that will either a) perpetuate a larger government b) have readily accessible political workers c) giving incentives for volunteership for certain segments of the population that wouldn’t go to other segments. Then Obummer is going to do away with the charitable tax deducation which will force people to reexamine their giving. Charities will lose but federally-subsidized volunteer rackets will gain.
This bill has so many inherent inconsistencies and problems that I’m shocked you haven’t pointed them out. If you don’t like volunteering then why do you support forcing others (even kids) to volunteer, attach conditions to it, or limit how much the average American citizen can give?
As we did not tolerate King George’s press gangs let us not tolerate Obama’s
WHAT THE FOUNDING FATHERS MEANT BY
THE “MILITIA”
George Mason: “I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people.” (Elliott, Debates, 425-426)
Richard Henry Lee: “A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms.” (Additional letters from the Federal Farmer, at 169, 1788)
James Madison: “A WELL REGULATED militia, composed of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country.” (1st Annals of Congress, at 434, June 8th 1789,
On the Right to Keep and Bare Arms:
George Washington: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the people’s liberty teeth (and) keystone… the rifle and the pistol are equally indispensable… more than 99% of them [guns] by their silence indicate that they are in safe and sane hands. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference [crime]. When firearms go, all goes, we need them every hour.” (Address to 1st session of Congress)
To me these are more inspirational, moving and honest then that Hopey Changy thing.
It is the one that the House passed.
See above to get to the text. That is as much as I can do. You can do a little leg work too, and MM certainly should have before writing the article.
As for the substance of the bill, I don’t know. I don’t believe I said one word as to the merits of it. But I am not going to stand here and say there is one word in it that forces volunteerism. That is a lie. And unsubstantiated moaning about “forced service” does indeed seem to be the main frothmaker.
My idiot Congressman Roe voted for this crap.
What can we do when we find out about this stuff a week too late?
Hilarious. Now all the comments people tried to post under nicknames have popped up.
Well, I guess the bet can be back on now.
Nothing but programing, re-education and assimilation! Free thinkers need not apply.