Financial manipulation alert: Did AIG bailout money secretly prop up banks?

By Michelle Malkin  •  March 30, 2009 10:03 AM

Financial blogger Zero Hedge has a provocative post that will raise your blood pressure this morning. This is worth fist-pounding and investigation in Congress:

Exclusive: AIG Was Responsible For The Banks’ January & February Profitability

It’s complicated, but it boils down to this: Banks bragged about their wonderful performance the first two months of the year. The market responded positively. But Zero Hedge makes the case that the profitability was illusory — and that the feds surreptitiously funneled money to the banks via AIG.

ZH writes:

For those to whom this is merely a lot of mumbo-jumbo, let me explain in layman’s
terms:

AIG, knowing it would need to ask for much more capital from the Treasury imminently, decided to throw in the towel, and gifted major bank counter-parties with trades which were egregiously profitable to the banks, and even more egregiously money losing to the U.S. taxpayers, who had to dump more and more cash into AIG, without having the U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner disclose the real extent of this, for lack of a better word, fraudulent scam.

In simple terms think of it as an auto dealer, which knows that U.S. taxpayers will provide for an infinite amount of money to fund its ongoing sales of horrendous vehicles (think Pontiac Azteks): the company decides to sell all the cars currently in contract, to lessors at far below the amortized market value, thereby generating huge profits for these lessors, as these turn around and sell the cars at a major profit, funded exclusively by U.S. taxpayers (readers should feel free to provide more gripping allegories).

What this all means is that the statements by major banks, i.e. JPM, Citi, and BofA, regarding abnormal profitability in January and February were true, however these profits were a) one-time in nature due to wholesale unwinds of AIG portfolios, b) entirely at the expense of AIG, and thus taxpayers, c) executed with Tim Geithner’s (and thus the administration’s) full knowledge and intent, d) were basically a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks (in yet another form) using AIG as an intermediary.

For banks to proclaim their profitability in January and February is about as close to criminal hypocrisy as is possible. And again, the taxpayers fund this “one time profit”, which causes a market rally, thus allowing the banks to promptly turn around and start selling more expensive equity (soon coming to a prospectus near you), also funded by taxpayers’ money flows into the market. If the administration is truly aware of all these events (and if Zero Hedge knows about it, it is safe to say Tim Geithner also got the memo), then the potential fallout would be staggering once this information makes the light of day.

…This wholesale manipulation of markets, investors and taxpayers has gone on long enough.

***

Surprise, surprise: Geithner Says Some Banks Need ‘Large Amounts’ of Assistance

Posted in: AIG

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Blog @ MoreWhat.com
  2. World Stocks Tumble amid renewed auto, banking fears « Goodtimepolitics
  3. Billions More for Failed Bailouts | OpenMarket.org
  4. Glenn Beck Does the Unthinkable: Asks What Law Permits the Government to Demand AIG Bonuses « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #663034
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:16 am, Jeff2161 said:

    This is NO surprise. I’m sure the foreign banks were equally ” profitable”.

  2. #663035
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:17 am, James Felix said:

    AIG, knowing it would need to ask for much more capital from the Treasury imminently, decided to throw in the towel, and gifted major bank counter-parties with trades which were egregiously profitable to the banks, and even more egregiously money losing to the U.S. taxpayers…

    I work in the securities industry. If I did this I’d lose my license and most likely face jail time. Period.

  3. #663040
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:19 am, Jeff2161 said:

    Next, Hedge funds will be given billions too.

  4. #663046
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:20 am, Jeff2161 said:

    I work in the securities industry. If I did this I’d lose my license and most likely face jail time. Period.

    Unlikely, now a days…

  5. #663050
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:22 am, karl9000 said:

    I’ve been saying for years that this country was on the precipice of fascism.

    Sometimes I hate it when I’m right.

    About the only good thing to come out of this is that we can no longer claim with a straight face that large corporations are capitalists.

    The anarchists at G20 are complaining that capitalism caused the current meltdown. It should be clear that it’s the facist/socialist welfare system at all levels that caused this mess.

    But it is easier to blame something that died long ago…

  6. #663052
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:22 am, Misscheryl said:

    But Zero Hedge makes the case that the profitability was illusory

    Our economy has been nothing but an illusion for years.

  7. #663053
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:22 am, Insomniac said:

    Just more smoke and mirrors, at the taxpayers’ expense. This should be no surprise to anyone who’s been paying attention.

  8. #663055
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:26 am, DBNinKY said:

    What this all means is that the statements by major banks, i.e. JPM, Citi, and BofA, regarding abnormal profitability in January and February were true, however these profits were…one-time in nature due…entirely at the expense…[of]taxpayers…executed with Tim Geithner’s (and thus the administration’s) full knowledge and intent…basically a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks… .

    Wow! That does explain how major banks, many of them head-deep in suspect securities and wavering derivatives, could even come close to reporting profits so early in a year where the economy is yet to bottom out in many lead key-indicators.

  9. #663056
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:27 am, WarTip said:

    It should not have been a secret to anyone who has been paying attention to this attack on our capitalist society. Dying companies should be allowed to die a natural death, let the up and comers take their place. We the people win. Get the government OUT OF PRIVATE INDUSTRY NOW!

  10. #663058
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:28 am, conservativesRus said:

    Of course – do you trust any reporting the gov’t does?
    The gov’t collects and publishes all sorts of data. I’ve been skeptical for quite a while about the integrity of presented data, but with the continued decline in the value of honesty (both those in the government and the citizenry), ANY report should be taken with a grain of salt.

  11. #663064
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:35 am, jjmurphy said:

    I was curious as well about the supposed profitability of the banks in Jan/Feb. I guess we’ll see in a few months what their statements look like after all this money is gone.

  12. #663068
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:37 am, rktkr said:

    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:19 am, Jeff2161 said:
    Next, Hedge funds will be given billions too.

    yeah… Soros is already practicing his dr. evil laugh

  13. #663069
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:37 am, BlackFlag55 said:

    I keep getting emails that claim AIG is the insurer of Congressional pensions. I generally don’t rely on random angry emails for Due Diligence, but this would fit the profile of Congressional CYA while screwing all other American businesses and citizens. Any Malkin poster have definitive Yes or No on this?

  14. #663080
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:44 am, WarTip said:

    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:37 am, BlackFlag55 said:
    I keep getting emails that claim AIG is the insurer of Congressional pensions. I generally don’t rely on random angry emails for Due Diligence, but this would fit the profile of Congressional CYA while screwing all other American businesses and citizens. Any Malkin poster have definitive Yes or No on this?

    I have also heard it rumored that they could indeed be the banking resource for a large number of black ops and other “hidden” resources of the US government but I have not seen any proof of any of this. Personally, I do not care. The government needs to get its danged nose out of the private sector before it gets bloodied. I do not care if it is something so complex as national security funds or something so simple as campaign contributions, the government needs to get the heck out of the way and let the free market run its course.

  15. #663081
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:44 am, sonofdy said:

    Are you telling me that there was dishonesty??? :shock:

    And that the government was involved??

    :shock:

    REALLLYYYY?????

    :shock:
    :shock:
    :shock:
    :shock:
    :shock:
    :shock:

  16. #663098
    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:58 am, nacho475 said:

    I don’t see this reported/quoted anywhere yet but when Geithner said that the free market won’t get us out of this – I almost lost my breakfast.

  17. #663100
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:00 am, WarTip said:

    The Free Market WOULD get us out of this if the Bubba Gubmint machine would get out of the way and let it do its job. But alas, this is what we get for so many generations of career welfare recipients being allowed to vote … and no, that is not directed at any single race.

  18. #663103
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:04 am, Jeff2161 said:

    Round up the usual suspects. ACORN to the rescue.

  19. #663104
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:07 am, Misscheryl said:

    AAAAhhhh, noot to worry- Obama gonna fix evieting.

  20. #663114
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:20 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Not to toot my horn, but I was linking to articles and blog posts the last week or so saying that AIG was bailed out to save politically connected banks and investment houses.

  21. #663118
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:22 am, John Deaux said:

    On March 30th, 2009 at 10:37 am, rktkr said:
    yeah… Soros is already practicing his dr. evil laugh

    He’s been laughing for a while. Ever since he got his bought-and-paid-for Senator Schumer to crash IndyMac so he could buy it up at fire sale prices. Now he’s making a mint.

    George Soros is shorting our country and through his network of bought-and-paid-for politicians, having the deck stacked in his favor.

  22. #663125
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:24 am, right_on said:

    AIG is the name of a business. Much like a gun, it cannot take independent action. It takes a person to pull the trigger. Why don’t we get the names of those involved (aside from T.G.) in creating this deal, if indeed it is true?

    Vilification! Yeah, they continue to create villains to distract America from what’s really going on…the systemic de-capitalization of private business, and the consolidation of absolute power by the Obama Administration.

    By the time the citizens realize what has happened, there will be no more “We The People.”

    1) The MSM…in the bag.
    2) Liberal domination in Congress…in the bag.
    3) Conservative talk radio…working to eliminate it.
    4) Conscription of the U.S. financial markets…in the bag.
    5) Justice Department…in the bag.
    6) SCOTUS…working on it.
    7) Outlawing lawful gun ownership…in the works.
    8) The military…he is the “lawful” Commander in Chief.

    What’s it look like to YOU?

  23. #663146
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:35 am, monad888 said:

    Can someone please identify a large non-politically connected bank or investment house for me? I’m having trouble finding one, because when you get large, you HAVE to be politically connected.

    This type of hysteria isn’t going to help the problem, it’s just going to make things worse.

    We have no choice but to clean up the mess. We either pump federal money into the system to let it unwind via the private market driven deals, which is what is really going on with AIG, or we nationalize everything and essentially zero out all their transactions under one roof….the government owned financial system roof.

    Its one or the other, take your pick. The notion that we can just let the entire shebang fail is sort of insane. The more people complain about how the system unwinds, the more likely we’ll get federalization of the system. Be careful what you complain about.

  24. #663147
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:36 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    AIG was a very profitable and well run company until the whore-mongering Elliot Spitzer threatened the company with criminal prosecution, as he had done to many other companies to shake down campaign contributions, and forced the Republican CEO out…

  25. #663153
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:37 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Bear Stearns- nowhere near as politically connected as Goldman Sachs.

    One was sold off to JP Morgan, and one wasn’t.

  26. #663168
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:47 am, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Lehman Brothers isn’t around anymore either…

  27. #663193
    On March 30th, 2009 at 12:04 pm, monad888 said:

    Ed……Both Bear Stearns or Lehman were politically connected. Undeniable. It would not matter who is gone or who is left standing, you would be pointing to those connections and making the same argument…that some “insider” is screwing the rest of us.

    I also find it ironic that you are slamming political connections, but at the same time complaining about Spitzer ousting Greenberg. Hank Greenberg was one of the most politically connected of the bunch.

  28. #663208
    On March 30th, 2009 at 12:11 pm, Ken M. said:

    One huge money-laundering scam, under the auspices and sponsorship of our Government.

    Even liberals, like Michael Goodwin of the NY Daily news, are finally getting it:
    Follow the Money

  29. #663278
    On March 30th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, txvet2 said:

    I don’t know why this comes as a shock or a surprise. What part of “insure” don’t you understand???? What did you think the money was for?????

  30. #663290
    On March 30th, 2009 at 12:48 pm, nbarry said:

    One of the banks to which AIG funneled our tax dollars is UBS, which has made fortunes helping tax evaders and money launderers get away with it.

  31. #663347
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:15 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    So long as the game requires that we all assume that this is just a crisis in investor confidence, nothing will get fixed and we will continue to dump taxpayer money into the abyss never to see it again.

    You would think that with all the talk of disclosure and accountability, we would be getting disclosure and accountability.

    This is the biggest organized looting of public wealth in history by far.

  32. #663352
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, flenser said:

    were basically a transfer of money from taxpayers to banks

    Not exactly communism, is it? It’s almost like we’re getting ripped off by politically connected rich people.

  33. #663360
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:23 pm, flenser said:

    We either pump federal money into the system to let it unwind via the private market driven deals, which is what is really going on with AIG, or we nationalize everything and essentially zero out all their transactions under one roof….the government owned financial system roof.

    How about we do neither of those things? Pumping money into the system is being done to stop it unwinding. If we ever want things to really resolve themselves we need to stop pumping money into these companies.

  34. #663370
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:27 pm, flenser said:

    Get the government OUT OF PRIVATE INDUSTRY NOW!

    Yes, but private industry will fight you every step of the way in doing that.

    There are no atheists in foxholes, and there are no free-marketeers in bankrupt corporations.

  35. #663379
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:30 pm, flenser said:

    alas, this is what we get for so many generations of career welfare recipients being allowed to vote

    You’re correct, as long as you understand that the biggest welfare recipients of all are on Wall Street.

  36. #663391
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, jhn1 said:

    “(readers should feel free to provide more gripping allegories).”

    How about AIG sells off “troubled” thousand dollar bills at 5% of face value to other financial institutions also “too big to be allowed to fail”.
    Favored financial institutions resell “troubled” thousand dollar bills at 15% of face value and pocket lots of “profits”, while holding press conferences about return of profitability (spiking their stock prices upwards). Whoever bought these is going to have to go through whatever legal battles to recover the value, and suffer whatever losses occur to whatever part is not recoverable.
    Taxpayers replace AIG’s “troubled” thousand dollar bills at face value.

    Two winners
    One maybe winner yet to play
    Only one nonwinner, and if the maybe wins they can be attacked for winning at taxpayer expense and the profits “recovered” for “the people”.

  37. #663429
    On March 30th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, Bruce said:

    HOW ARE WE GOING TO STOP ALL THIS??

  38. #663703
    On March 30th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, MarcoPolo said:

    I have a friend on Wall St. Here’s what he told me:

    Anyone who believes the bank profits are anything but accounting gimmicks is a fool. Here’s the deal – Banks have been booking their normal monthly and expenses, from their regular operating activities, in the first 2 months of 1st quarter. These typically are profitable (duh.) Coupled with the fact that most banks can borrow money at zero percent interest, they’re turning a profit.

    But at the end of March, they will have to assess the garbage assets (like their CDOs) still on their balance sheets. Given there is no market for these, they will incur further massive writedowns which will obliterate any operating line profits they have. (unless Tiny Timmy waves his wand and takes them away.)

    This is why they are desperately begging to get rid of the mark-to-market rule for illiquid assets. It makes it all too clear that they really are in deep, deep $#%^.

    (edited for naughty word.)

  39. #663791
    On March 30th, 2009 at 7:09 pm, cheapseat said:

    i tried to explain to lgm and chappie last week as the stock market was going up that it was all end of quarter short covering, and after the month end, look out. well the dow has fallen 400 plus points in the last 2 days. by the end of this week as obama gets his ass kicked in europe, the market will be back at 6500.

  40. #663970
    On March 30th, 2009 at 11:27 pm, love2rumba said:

    Not to toot my horn, but I was linking to articles and blog posts the last week or so saying that AIG was bailed out to save politically connected banks and investment houses.

    Yep..it is a matter of degree of connection, not sane financial practices

  41. #663991
    On March 31st, 2009 at 12:26 am, plymouthacclaim said:

    Capitalism can’t die any more than gravity can die. You can temporarily overcome gravity with brute force, but it will triumph in the end. The same with capitalism. It might just take a while.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Barney Frank has a snit fit

June 11, 2009 12:57 PM by Michelle Malkin

101 Comments | 18 Trackbacks

Goodbye, sir!

After the “Special Master of Compensation”

June 9, 2009 04:39 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Feds extend Crap Sandwich to life insurers

April 8, 2009 09:10 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 8 Trackbacks

Gulp.

Salary control: You knew it was coming

March 31, 2009 10:42 AM by Michelle Malkin

168 Comments | 31 Trackbacks

Grabby Hands.

“Because they are undeserving of it”

March 30, 2009 06:26 PM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 15 Trackbacks

Asshats In Government.

The strange sacking of a top Treasury official

March 27, 2009 05:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

48 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

And another one down, and another one gone…

The coming G20 riots & the spread of mob rule

March 27, 2009 04:32 AM by Michelle Malkin

167 Comments | 30 Trackbacks


Categories: AIG



Legal Insurrection

» Yes, It Really Is That Bad
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook