Salary control: You knew it was coming
| Tweet |

This is not a surprise. Grabby Hands Barney Frank has been signaling his salary control plans for weeks. In early February, you’ll recall, he told Business Week that compensation restrictions might be restricted to all US companies, not just TARP recipients.
Now, via Byron York:
[I]n a little-noticed move, the House Financial Services Committee, led by chairman Barney Frank, has approved a measure that would, in some key ways, go beyond the most draconian features of the original AIG bill. The new legislation, the “Pay for Performance Act of 2009,” would impose government controls on the pay of all employees — not just top executives — of companies that have received a capital investment from the U.S. government. It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place. And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.
The purpose of the legislation is to “prohibit unreasonable and excessive compensation and compensation not based on performance standards,” according to the bill’s language. That includes regular pay, bonuses — everything — paid to employees of companies in whom the government has a capital stake, including those that have received funds through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The measure is not limited just to those firms that received the largest sums of money, or just to the top 25 or 50 executives of those companies. It applies to all employees of all companies involved, for as long as the government is invested. And it would not only apply going forward, but also retroactively to existing contracts and pay arrangements of institutions that have already received funds.
In addition, the bill gives Geithner the authority to decide what pay is “unreasonable” or “excessive.”And it directs the Treasury Department to come up with a method to evaluate “the performance of the individual executive or employee to whom the payment relates.”
The bill passed the Financial Services Committee last week, 38 to 22, on a nearly party-line vote. (All Democrats voted for it, and all Republicans, with the exception of Reps. Ed Royce of California and Walter Jones of North Carolina, voted against it.)
But you can thank the 85 Republicans, led by Minority Whip Eric Cantor, who helped pave this path with their hysterical vote for the 90 percent AIG bonus tax.
“A” Is for Agitation: Radical Chicago Teachers on Parade
September 12, 2012 11:47 AM by Michelle Malkin
Say it ain’t so: Nancy Pelosi’s female staffers paid less than men?
June 3, 2012 10:37 AM by Doug Powers
Sacrifice: Obama, Holder, Kerry give back 5 percent of their salaries in solidarity with furloughed federal workers
April 6, 2013 05:13 AM by Doug Powers
Fundraiser-in-chief’s campaign on unsustainable spending spree
July 23, 2012 11:43 AM by Michelle Malkin
Categories: 2012 Campaign, Politics
Daily Caller
» It’s official: Chicago Public Schools will close 49 elementary schools for goodGreen Room
» Carney: On second thought, reporters, your questions are teh awesomeGreen Room
» No TEMS todayGay Patriot
» The Slow Death of Irony Continues in ColoradoDaily Caller
» Google actually does something patrioticGay Patriot
» Thoughts on the Boy Scouts & gaysDaily Caller
» Jeb Bush boosts Senate bill by supporting outline of dealGay Patriot
» And still some (journalists) swoon at the mere mention of his name






