Afternoon conservative Rorschach test

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 2, 2009 12:16 PM

Take a look here and come back and share your thoughts.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Politics

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    Uhhhh….

    Bizzare?

    Where does that put me on the old scale?

  2. #2
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:22 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I see a total devaluation of life in general, and motherhood specifically. I also see the absolute devaluing of a child , especially a baby. Lastly, the “I’ll do whatever I want” look to the photos seals it for me. I’m a traditional, original intent, conservative American.

  3. #3
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    From some of the comments:

    “Love it! I am so sick of the cult of the mother that has been growing to epic proportions in this country. It’s ridiculous.”

    Said by a person borne and raised by…a mother.

    Those pictures are terrible, but no shock. The left HATES traditional families and women who use their bodies for something other than random sex and multiple abortions.

    I, for one, am perfectly happy to be a part of the “cult of the mother” because I am raising a beautiful son, expecting another (we find out if the baby’s a boy or a girl on April 10!), and hope to have at least 1-2 more. These children our are future and, ironically, liberals who disdain having children are contracepting themselves (and their ideologies, thank goodness!) out of exsistence.

    There’s nothing like brining fecundity to a culture fight.

  4. #4
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Jeff2161 said:

    Let’s see….Pregnant woman throwing away a child already born, check. Child number two on the way. Contraception through infanticide ?

    :shock:

  5. #5
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:26 pm, sonofdy said:

    Its just what liberals call “art”

    shurg

    dumb.

  6. #6
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:27 pm, granite said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:22 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    I see a total devaluation of life in general, and motherhood specifically. I also see the absolute devaluing of a child , especially a baby. Lastly, the “I’ll do whatever I want” look to the photos seals it for me.

    Yep.
    You beat me to it.
    Irreconcilably opposite worldview.
    Those photos are infinitely bizarre…still stuck in the 60s.

    I’m a traditional, original intent, conservative American.

    Yep again.
    I’m with you.

  7. #7
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, pressto said:

    “Love it! I am so sick of the cult of the mother that has been growing to epic proportions in this country. It’s ridiculous.”

    Nadya ‘Octomom’ Suleman would agree with her.

  8. #8
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:28 pm, CyberCipher said:

    The question is “What would it look like if Paris Hilton had children?”

    My collie says:

    I hope the final jeopardy question is that easy.

  9. #9
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, Misscheryl said:

    The modern woman = ME, ME, ME, ME…it’s all about ME! I WANT, WANT, WANT, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme

    ME, Myself and I!!!!!!! No class, no grace, no kindness!

    That pretty much sums up for me.

  10. #10
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    I’d also have to go with

    Bizarre.

    I’m not even sure what message they’re trying to convey. But maybe…..

    Complete irreverence for a child being carried?

    That you can wear trendy clothes when you’re pregnant?

    That babies are a fashion statement?

    Whatever the message, I doubt it’s about the “glow” of expectant mothers.

  11. #11
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    Motherhood is a “cult”? What about people who eat? Is eating a “cult” too? Product of a troubled mind.

  12. #12
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, stillontheroad said:

    The Cult of the Mother? One wonders what she thinks of hers.

  13. #13
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm, NJ-Aviator said:

    Misscheryl said:

    The modern woman = ME, ME, ME, ME…it’s all about ME! I WANT, WANT, WANT, gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme

    You could be on to something there.

  14. #14
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:33 pm, denver republican said:

    I see some fierce shoes and nothing else of interest.

  15. #15
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, tomg51 said:

    I couldn’t get past the bizarre clothing. Is this how the French dress?

  16. #16
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm, RufusTFirefly said:

    I see a very lame attempt at some sort of message whilst basically advertising expensive clothing & accessories.

    It is ‘lame’ because the message is unreadable. They’re simply trying to be edgy or avant-garde. Fail.

    That aside, I’m more frightened of a female that apparently does not eat and stands in shoes that high when it is pregnant.

    Just trying to sell clothes. $1500 blouse anyone?

  17. #17
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:39 pm, LibTired (KO) said:

    Appalling.

  18. #18
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:39 pm, granite said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Those pictures are terrible, but no shock. The left HATES traditional families and women who use their bodies for something other than random sex and multiple abortions.

    Correct.

    I, for one, am perfectly happy to be a part of the “cult of the mother” because I am raising a beautiful son, expecting another (we find out if the baby’s a boy or a girl on April 10!), and hope to have at least 1-2 more.

    God bless you.
    We had three kids, and have two grandchildren…a third is on the way.

    These children our are future and, ironically, liberals who disdain having children are contracepting themselves (and their ideologies, thank goodness!) out of exsistence.

    There’s nothing like brining fecundity to a culture fight.

    That is likely one reason that socialists/opposite worldview-holders/nihilists are so hot about human cloning and embryonic stem-cell research; about public education’s starting as early as possible; about the ridicule and marginalization of Judeo-Christian traditions and morals (socialists have perverted the word “ethics”); etc….

    Hey, creating babies and raising them outside of the traditional family, and indoctrinating them in state-controlled “schools” is the only way the opposite worldview-holders can maintain and perpetuate themselves ; otherwise, they would ultimately dwindle away (Oh, God, please let it happen!) and disappear, not unlike the way the Shakers did.

  19. #19
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:40 pm, battleaxe said:

    Liberals should really hate that spread too. The first baby lived, the second hasn’t been aborted yet, and the mother is smoking but social services hasn’t taken away the baby.

  20. #20
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    The idea that this image does anything other than disgust a viewer confirms my worst fears for this society.

    bada bing!

  21. #21
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, RedDog said:

    These fools will get a wake-up call when forced to contend with traditionalist Latinos and uber-Muslims as their populations explode here in the coming years.

  22. #22
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:41 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    My comments would get me banned faster than a cop on a donut.

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

  23. #23
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:42 pm, expat said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    How dare you keep women in bondage and submit yourself willingly? /sarc

    You hit it on the head. As long as we continue to have families that replace ourselves and the libs don’t, we will come out ahead. Just hate the pain the US has to go through to get there. I am very concerned for my children and their opportunities in the future.

  24. #24
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:43 pm, no2pcbs1 said:

    individuals like tabitha and jill will say completely stupid things to take away from the fact they can’t accept being women. they ridicule that which they haven’t got the courage to undertake, give birth. they look at themselves in the mirror and see how pathetic they are, get angry and decide to take it out on those who want to have a baby. these women have simply set a standard too high for tabitha and jill to attain.

  25. #25
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:43 pm, Dexter Alarius said:

    Casey Anthony models?

  26. #26
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:44 pm, RufusTFirefly said:

    Can I be the first to also suggest the removal of the term ‘baby-bump’ from our lexicon?!

  27. #27
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:48 pm, ErinF said:

    Save a baby. Abort liberalism.

  28. #28
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:50 pm, MtsEdge said:

    These children our are future and, ironically, liberals who disdain having children are contracepting themselves (and their ideologies, thank goodness!) out of exsistence

    granite beat me to it. This is why libs have such a strong need to indoctrinate others, self-perpetuation.

  29. #29
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, MtsEdge said:

    The first baby lived, the second hasn’t been aborted yet, and the mother is smoking but social services hasn’t taken away the baby.

    But smoking is GOOD now, just ask POTUSINO.

  30. #30
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, pedro4 said:

    I enjoy looking back at pictures of my mother in 1959 smoking a cigarette, holding a cocktail, and 7 months pregnant with me. You would get arrested for that today! The comment “This is Sparta” strikes me as the correct interprtation of picture number 2. I just finished reading “A Nation Of Wimps”, and feel that we are creating the neediest bunch of whiners that our country will ever see. Time to symbolically throw our kids out there and let them get hurt a little, maybe even get a “B” on their report card!

  31. #31
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:51 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    I see the cult of the Anti-Mother. Nothing nurturing here. Can’t see the glow of pregnancy under all those nicotine stains.

  32. #32
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm, englishqueen01 said:
    From some of the comments:

    “Love it! I am so sick of the cult of the mother that has been growing to epic proportions in this country. It’s ridiculous.”

    Said by a person borne and raised by…a mother.

    With whom she apparently has issues.

  33. #33
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Motherhood is a “cult”? What about people who eat? Is eating a “cult” too? Product of a troubled mind.

    Remember, to liberals gender roles and motherhood are not instinctual, but the product of social constructs.

    Meanwhile, all manners of sexual proclivity and abortion are immutable (I actually had someone on a blog tell me the desire to abort is “in our DNA”).

    If that dizzying logic makes your head hurt, take two aspirin and join the club because it sure doesn’t make sense to me.

  34. #34
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:54 pm, HomeoftheBrave said:

    The ads are ugly and negatively shocking. As a marketer, I see no value. The models are ugly, too. The baby, though it is a doll, is cute. The French and most other Euros are actually backward, snotty, and self-centered socialists. Real mothers are cool, inspiring, and heroic. I guess I’m a conservative. God that feels good!

  35. #35
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:55 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Real mothers are cool, inspiring, and heroic.

    Taking a cue from your moniker,they’re also brave.

    As I saw on a bumper sticker recently, “Motherhood is not for wimps!”

  36. #36
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, MtsEdge said:

    oops heroic = brave :oops:

  37. #37
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, RTater said:

    Rufus – The next time the opportunity presents itself, instead of “baby bump”, you could use “fetus foothill” or “zygote zenith”, or in keeping with the Kenyan Bastard’s redefining of terms, “burden bump”. Or maybe “mommy mountain”, or “pregnancy pinnacle”. I like alliteration.

  38. #38
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Dawn Johnsen, a feminist (as if you wouldn’t be able to put it together) states:

    “The argument that women who become pregnant have in some sense consented to the pregnancy belies reality…and others who are the inevitable losers in the contraceptive lottery no more ‘consent’ to pregnancy than pedestrians ‘consent’ to being struck by drunk drivers.’”

    “The woman is constantly aware for nine months that her body is not wholly her own: the state has conscripted her body for its own ends. Thus, abortion restrictions ‘reduce pregnant women to no more than fetal containers.’”

    “Statutes that curtail her abortion choice are disturbingly suggestive of involuntary servitude, prohibited by the Thirteenth Amendment, in that forced pregnancy requires a woman to provide continuous physical service to the fetus in order to further the state’s asserted interest.”

    I can’t wait to try my hand again at becoming a fetal container. It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

  39. #39
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:57 pm, Hangfire said:

    Motherhood is not a cult.

    What has become ridiculous, however, is the elevation to sainthood of the S I N G L E mother in our society. So much is made of the “bravery, sacrifice, power” ad nauseum of single mothers that the marginalization of the American Male is the obvious result.

  40. #40
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:58 pm, UrbanSpaceman said:

    I have mixed feelings about stating that smoking during pregnancy causes problems–my mom smoked while pregnant with my brother then with me (as well as when nursing us), and I am not aware of any issues we have that can be pinpointed on her smoking.

    Overall, I do agree that a mom-to-be should abstain from actions that do seem to cause issues, like smoking and drinking alcohol.

    As for the ads/pix: I think they are some of the dumbest things I have seen. This new photo style stinks.

    As for the subjects: if a woman is not willing to care for a child and change her ways, she should keep her knees together–or give her kid (for Mr. Obama fans, “burden”) up for adoption. I know the “ME ME ME” attitude is practiced by too many people, and it is wrong. If you are not willing to deal with the results of your action, do not do that action (e.g., if you do not want kids, do not have sex, if you do not want to go to jail for DUI, do not drink and drive).

    I guess I am ranting on the lack of accepting responsibility for one’s actions that is so pervasive.

    Also, I agree that stilettos should be discarded after the first trimester.

  41. #41
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:02 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

    30pcs: I recently lost a baby. I wish you the best. Things will get better.

    P.S. Dawn Johnsen sounds like one bitter female.

  42. #42
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:03 pm, vargas said:

    I feel…ehh. Where does apathetic put me on the scale?
    I didn’t get much out of the spread one way or the other. Mostly I imagine because I don’t care about fashion. I find most fashion shoots don’t really convey much of a message to me.
    That being said, I found the smoking mother one distasteful (and I say this as a smoker), as well as the one with the model ‘shooting up’ the bottle (I say this not as a heroin user). I think there are ways to be edgy, and comment on motherhood (or whatever they were going for) without also, directly or subconsciously, glamorizing dangerous behavior.

  43. #43
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:03 pm, txvet2 said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    Uhhhh….

    Bizzare?

    Where does that put me on the old scale?

    Somewhere around “illiterate”, I would imagine. But those pictures are definitely “bizarre”. As an ex-husband and father of three, it looks to me more like a beer gut than a pregnancy, but maybe Europeans do it differently.

  44. #44
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:04 pm, granite said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I can’t wait to try my hand again at becoming a fetal container. It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

    Glad you’re OK.
    Some ectopics are potentially life-threatening.

    We’ve exchaged posts on this before; so, I’ll just say good luck and God bless!

  45. #45
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:08 pm, MrScribbler said:

    I see photos that did exactly what those who created them intended: they attracted attention.

    Whatever they represent is in the viewers’ eyes. And, to use an archaic phrase, Michelle and each of you walked into the trap like a round-eyed baby.

    It’s the old “I don’t care what they say, as long as they talk about me” trick. And it works, after all these years.

    Slow news day, MM?

  46. #46
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:08 pm, right_on said:

    Too many messages to sort out in that picture to know what exactly what point the photographer was trying to convey.

    From top to bottom:

    Glamor: Appearance is everything in liberalism.

    Smoking: It’s my body, and I’ll do what I want. Don’t tell me what to do.

    The clothing: Upper, business sheik; bottom, trailer trash/ hooker sheik.

    Long leg exposure: Unabashed, unrestricted sex.

    The baby: #1) Baggage; #2) Abortion, lose the baby.

    I guess the message I get is that liberalism has no ethical encumbrances, is guiltless and callous.

    I didn’t need a picture to tell me that.

  47. #47
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:12 pm, CJ said:

    I see another reason I’m to be thankful my ancestors left France 300 years ago. I’m just not weird enough to appreciate that form of “art.”

  48. #48
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:17 pm, Hangfire said:

    I must confess to a weakness for Courvoisier. Other than that, I see no reason that France can’t be an accumulation point for nuclear and toxic waste.

    A favorite picture I have on my hard-drive is of the “French Army Knife.” It consists of a corkscrew and a white flag.

  49. #49
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:21 pm, JustAThought said:

    Since I’m actually at work I didn’t take time to read through all of the comments so I apologize if someone else already stated what should be painfully obvious: They’re French. Who give a rat’s %$# what they think, in particular, what they think about the morals and standards of the USA?

  50. #50
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:27 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:02 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:
    It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

    30pcs: I recently lost a baby. I wish you the best. Things will get better.

    P.S. Dawn Johnsen sounds like one bitter female.

    Thanks, MtsEdge.

    Sorry for your loss.

  51. #51
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:29 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Disgusting display of immoral behavior, as is many of the sights you see in the liberal media. Not surprising, but disgusting nevertheless.

    I saw video yesterday of a man at a baseball game, up in the bleachere holding a small child. A fly ball came at hims and he stood up and, holding the kid with one hand, caught the ball with the other. Then, in his excitement, he lifted his arm up high with the ball and at the same time caused the child to jerk backward. It looked like the child must have gotten a bad whiplash from that. Yeah, people are pretty stupid sometimes and I pity our children. They should ALL be TREASURED

  52. #52
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:30 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I keep hitting the submit button!! Gotta cut those nails. I wanted to finish my sentence. They should ALL be TREASURED and not used as props!

  53. #53
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:04 pm, granite said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I can’t wait to try my hand again at becoming a fetal container. It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

    Glad you’re OK.
    Some ectopics are potentially life-threatening.

    We’ve exchaged posts on this before; so, I’ll just say good luck and God bless!

    Hey there, granite!

    Thanks. This one wasn’t without complications. Just last week I thought I would be having emergency surgery as they thought I was bleeding internally. Luckily, I was not.

    It turns out that the embyro was in my tubes at the time that they thought I was miscarrying … by the time they figured out that it was an ectopic pregnancy the embryo was free floating in my abdominal cavity. I was given methotrexate to help reabsorb the pregnancy but no one mentioned just how painful all of that would be. At any rate, I’m better now that I had a few days on bed rest. Oh, and sorry for being so graphic.

    Take care.

  54. #54
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:33 pm, huggybear said:

    As long as we continue to have families that replace ourselves and the libs don’t, we will come out ahead.

    Oh dear, you don’t actually believe this, do you? Liberals are aborting and contracepting their ideology out of existence? This is just as goofy as the “cult of motherhood” comments, you know.

    Anyway… I see some ugly clothes that are getting a lot of extra exposure beyond the readership of French Vogue, thanks to an “edgy” fashion shoot. Bravo to the photographer.

  55. #55
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm, MtsEdge said:

    Anyway… I see some ugly clothes that are getting a lot of extra exposure beyond the readership of French Vogue, thanks to an “edgy” fashion shoot. Bravo to the photographer.

    funny, I didn’t notice the clothes…

  56. #56
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:35 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Go for it 30! Well, I mean, uh, you know what I mean…. :)

    My first thought on the first picture? “Is that really underwear?”

  57. #57
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, zeroangel said:

    *yawn*

    Bizarre. It’s in the same camp as “modern-art” (or whatever it’s called these days).

    It’s just supposed to edgy and exact some kind of “emotional response” or just go against “cultural norms.” It doesn’t matter how distasteful, in fact the more distasteful or bizarre the better.

    Paintballs on canvas is “art.” Disturbing images of mutilated genitals is “art” (no kidding, I actually saw a display like that in the Met years ago).

    It’s just stupid. I guess that makes me a philistine.

    /me clicks “ignore.”

    30 pcs of silver:

    I am sorry to hear this. You have my sincere sympathies.

  58. #58
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Thanks, AlohaGuy!

    I swear I’ll have some good news to report one of these days.

  59. #59
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:40 pm, Tagwife said:

    Reminds me of this from 2 Timothy 3:1-4 1 But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God
    But that is my opinion

  60. #60
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, zeroangel said:

    Thanks, ZA!

    Much appreciated.

  61. #61
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:57 pm, granite said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:31 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    …sorry for being so graphic.

    No problem.
    I’ve seen plenty of those, and much that’s even worse.

    Again, glad you’re OK!

  62. #62
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:58 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 12:56 pm, 30 pcs of silver said: I can’t wait to try my hand again at becoming a fetal container. It turns out that what they thought was a miscarriage for me was indeed an ectopic pregnancy. Therefore, it will take a little more time before we can try again but that say will come and I can’t wait!

    I have been there. I had a miscarriage between my first and third child. It was a fourth month pregnancy and was a boy. My two other children are girls. You will have another child…have faith. By the way, I have 2, almost 3 grandSONS, so God has blessed us!

  63. #63
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:00 pm, Joy said:

    Disgusting… which apparently makes me a bonafide Conservative. GOOD.

  64. #64
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:03 pm, tre said:

    30 Pieces of Silver, I’ll say a prayer for you. God will give you children when He feels you’re ready.

    The term “Fetal Container” makes it sound like a curse, or a job. I love my two children. Fatherhood isn’t always easy, especially with an autistic son. And there are some things I like to do that can’t always be done with a family, such as touring on my motorcycle.

    But I wouldn’t trade them for anything.

  65. #65
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm, Salt said:

    30 pcs of silver:

    Happy to see you back and well. You’ll be in my prayers.

  66. #66
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:15 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 1:37 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    I swear I’ll have some good news to report one of these days.

    And you’ll appreciate it that much more.

    Best of luck to you.

  67. #67
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:15 pm, DagneyT said:

    And the good news is

    it’s something that makes us boring and backward compared to our culturally enlightened counterparts in Europe.

    I agree on his assessment of a person’s response being indicative of their political views!

  68. #68
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:25 pm, DagneyT said:

    So much is made of the “bravery, sacrifice, power” ad nauseum of single mothers that the marginalization of the American Male is the obvious result.

    I could not agree more!

  69. #69
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:27 pm, MtsEdge said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:25 pm, DagneyT said:
    So much is made of the “bravery, sacrifice, power” ad nauseum of single mothers that the marginalization of the American Male is the obvious result.
    I could not agree more!

    ditto here – way too much demeaning of men/fathers in this society

  70. #70
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:30 pm, mchristian said:

    It’s French. It’s merde.

  71. #71
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:32 pm, cicerokid said:

    “Yet over at Jezebel, blogger Tabitha loves the spread, and expresses regret that it wouldn’t be possible in the U.S. because of the puritanical nature of our society.”

    Has she been to L.A.? Folsom Fest?

    My first reaction: one fugley feline. Fake. Pretentious. Calous. Rude.

    Lady Liberty. The French gave us that gal?
    Note to self: avoid snails. Call mom.

  72. #72
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:39 pm, thewariscoming said:

    That’s what I’ve always said, englishqueen01 . Let the liberals abort their kids. That way, when the liberals die, their genes and, hopefully, beliefs die with them!

  73. #73
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:48 pm, 24Klady said:

    30 pcs of silver
    We’ll all keep you in our prayers and wait for the good news waiting for you. I thank God everyday for the one child/blessing I was able to have.

    The pictures are just more examples of the total breakdown of values, common sense, and morals. Hard to feel sorry for such shallow minds and selfish behavior.

  74. #74
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:49 pm, DirkBelig said:

    I see another example of “fashion” photography in which the clothes seem an afterthought instead of the focal point.

  75. #75
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:52 pm, Laree said:

    Which Supreme Court Justice are You?

    I am Alito…

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2009/04/supreme-test.html

  76. #76
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:54 pm, 30 pcs of silver said:

    Thanks for the well wishes, everyone!

    You guys rock!

  77. #77
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    You hit it on the head. As long as we continue to have families that replace ourselves and the libs don’t, we will come out ahead. Just hate the pain the US has to go through to get there. I am very concerned for my children and their opportunities in the future.

    I totally agree. Which is why we have to be strong and hard as diamonds to raise our children properly. It’s not easy, but it is a learning opportunity for them. We also need to watch out for intolerant liberals who will take away our parental rights (and our kids) in order to stifle us. Because they know fertility is the best way to pass on your values; hence all the clamor about banning homeschooling, and rampant indoctrination of our kids.

    Let the liberals abort their kids. That way, when the liberals die, their genes and, hopefully, beliefs die with them!

    Believe me, it is not my preference that liberals abort their kids. By all means, give them up for adoption to loving conservative families. I do, however, believe that every aborted and murdered child in this world goes to Heaven, where they are cared for by the Blessed Mother in ultimate happiness. Sometimes, that’s the only thought that brings me peace when I see what this world does to children.

    But – knowing my history – I know that voluntary sterility and a refusal to reproduce was a tenet of the Shakers and, well, they’re all but gone now, aren’t they? I mean, how many Shakers do any of us know in 2009?

    And, 30 pcs of silver, I will say a prayer for you!

  78. #78
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:57 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Meh. Weak, attention-fishing, noncontroversial, unimaginative wannabe art. Pretty easy to do those things with a doll.

    But what about the statements they’re trying to make, the thoughts they’re trying to evoke?

    Some people try too hard, and others look too deep for meaning behind such efforts. Some of those others are also easy to amuse or outrage, it seems. As for me, I see a pregnant model with high heels and no pants throwing a doll over her shoulder. I see a pregnant model in some ugly outfit smoking a lit cigarette over a doll in a basket. I see a pregnant model advertising perfume while looking at her stomach. I see a pregnant model rubbing her stomach and looking awkward in high heels while trying to tend to a doll in a carriage and holding a baby bottle between her legs. I see a pregnant model…

    Lame.

    As a conservative Rorschach test, I’d say that the message is clear: no baby-tossing, no holding lit cigarettes over baby, spend quality time with your baby, your hair looks stupid, take your sunglasses off before you put your baby in a high chair, you’re going to fall in those heels, and for pity’s sake, put some pants on. Oh, and don’t inject milk into your veins.

    Best of luck to you, 30.

  79. #79
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 3:06 pm, RufusTFirefly said:

    Laree–I must be hardcore; I scored a ‘Scalia’.

  80. #80
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 3:07 pm, tre said:

    Believe me, it is not my preference that liberals abort their kids. By all means, give them up for adoption to loving conservative families

    AMEN, English Queen. Let good Christian Conservatives raise them, teach them Christian Conservative values, and let them do the work God created them to do.

  81. #81
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 3:08 pm, RufusTFirefly said:

    Actually, the test popped up a window that read

    Attention: Your score was reported to the FBI, CIA and NSA. You will be contacted shortly.

  82. #82
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 3:28 pm, drivingjack said:

    My thought? I want to be backward, and do not regret it might not be shown here. Europeans pride themselves in the unconventional. You can also define that as immoral, lazy, lacking in substance. Nope, let me be a boorish American and stick to my traditional values that prizes the “cult of motherhood“.

  83. #83
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 3:43 pm, long_haired_conservative said:

    Not to sound like a broken record…. in Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” the concept of parenthood was considered pornographic.

    Just FFT.

  84. #84
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 4:05 pm, On-my-soap-box said:

    Since when are the French relevant?

    I look at those photo’s and wonder if mom and dad are proud. I sure hope not.

  85. #85
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 4:11 pm, thewariscoming said:

    Don’t get me wrong. I don’t wish innocent babies to be dead. I would rather the liberals not even get pregnant, ever. And they can bask in their selfish lifes. And then when they’re gone, it’s over. If one line dies out, another one will take over in this world.

  86. #86
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 4:15 pm, CO of Fort Housewife said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 2:55 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    EQ~your posts are so eloquent. Amen to everything you said.

    My thoughts on the photos? Gaudy. Ugly. Tasteless. And don’t get me started on the clothes…:) I, for one, am proud to be a mother. It’s a pity that some women don’t understand how wonderful it can be, because they are so wrapped up in themselves.

  87. #87
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 4:30 pm, Buy Danish said:

    The “cult of motherhood” is killing the planet. Babies are polluters. Only people who deconstruct our hetero-normative stereotypes should be allowed to produce, using surrogates and donated eggs and sperm. At birth the government should take over and raise the child. Our dying planet demands it.

  88. #88
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 4:34 pm, spaceycakes said:

    *test*

  89. #89
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 5:19 pm, Roman Con said:

    I really couldn’t get past the photographer’s utter ignorance of light and shadow. Aren’t these Froggies supposed to be artists?

    Oh yeah, and she’s a skank. As this was in Vogue (FR), I am surprised she wasn’t sporting a needle full of smack in her arm while wearing a mesh thong and aborting the live child like some postmodern manifestation of King Herod the Butcher.

    But really, did you see that horrible shadow on the left? What a bunch of Philistines.

  90. #90
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 5:45 pm, tanksoldier said:

    While I can’t comment on the cultural viewpoint in France I can say that in the US the sheer absurdity of the photos delivers the opposite message from what was probably intended.

    Here in the US viewers would mostly be saying “Well of _course_ you don’t smoke around a baby or handle your infant like Britney Spears; silly French people!”

    Here the same photos that were apparently intended to promote the “freedom” and “liberty” of women from the responsibilities of motherhood could just as well be used in an ad campaign to PROMOTE responsibility by mothers… ie: “Don’t be like these goofballs…”

  91. #91
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 5:50 pm, tanksoldier said:

    As for me, I see a pregnant model with high heels and no pants throwing a doll over her shoulder. I see a pregnant model in some ugly outfit smoking a lit cigarette over a doll in a basket.

    You know, that’s a good point. IF they really believe the view that they espouse in these pics, that babies are inconvenient useless baggage, they would have been using _real_ babies.

    Seriously. IF they hold that view then logically babies are of no value… so why lessen the impact of your message by using a doll?

  92. #92
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 6:18 pm, Brian Roastbeef said:

    I see a very small likelihood that the pregnant model waited until marriage.

    I see something stupid that I wouldn’t have wasted a second glance on if it weren’t for the article.

    So I guess the Rorshach test would put me at somewhere between “judgmental prude” and “sick of this world’s notion of ‘celebrity’”

    (whatever happened to those Mike Straka GRRR articles, anyway?)

    I guess I’d call myself a “chronically pissed-off conservative white male” at least for another 1389 days.

  93. #93
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 6:20 pm, zorro said:

    I see the “work” of someone who is very very disturbed.

    It reminds of an old saying, you can’t reason with a sick mind.

  94. #94
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 6:34 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    Why are we photo-documenting my life? The only thing we’re missing is the other guys in the background who were waiting for me to be overseas….

    :grin:

    (I’m a role model, not an idol :: Miley Cyrus, 2009)

  95. #95
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 6:35 pm, 29Victor said:

    spoiled empty narcissists

  96. #96
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 7:18 pm, happyscrapper said:

    I can’t tell you how much I miss the 1950′s! Seriously, life was good then and we had an innocence that was decent and peaceful. Family values, a sense of shame and conscience, and good old fashioned peace and good will toward each other. Sure, we had some problems, but they pale in comparison to today. I so desparately want to go back to the days of talking to the neighbors over the back fence while hanging clothes on the line. And letting my kids out to play until way past dark without worrying about them. Sorry…I got carried away. I just miss those great old days so much!

  97. #97
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 7:36 pm, zyzzyg said:

    OK, I’ll play.

    Thought the first pic was a PSA (Public Service Announcement) for women ‘with child.’ Yep, that is fine and certainly wise.

    Then the second. Hmmmm, was she tossing or catching the baby? Did not know how that connected to the first. Confusion.

    Followed the second link to the actual magazine. Heck, it is a series. There are captions that, more or less, explain the intent and motive.

    What I noticed overall, were the shoes. Good greif, were they tall. LOL.

  98. #98
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 7:39 pm, mockingbyrd said:

    I see photos of a self absorbed woman who has never known the fierce passion that motherhood awakens within a woman’s soul.

  99. #99
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 7:41 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 2nd, 2009 at 7:39 pm, mockingbyrd said:
    I see photos of a self absorbed woman who has never known the fierce passion that motherhood awakens within a woman’s soul.

    Great post! Your words gave me goose bumps.

  100. #100
    On April 2nd, 2009 at 9:27 pm, MNUSMCDavid said:

    happyscrapper
    when I was a kid in South Philly…. during the sumer we left the house at 7:30 AM didn’t come home until 4:30PM….. South Philly?!!!!… what ever happened? our culture weenified themselves, that’s what. Our streets, statistically (excepting Hmong and Somali thugs) are safer than they were when we were kids.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Cincinnati-Area School Pays Kids to… Show Up to School

February 13, 2012 09:43 PM by Doug Powers

15 Comments

Video: Mr. America

February 13, 2012 10:23 AM by Michelle Malkin

32 Comments

Greece Erupts After Vote for Austerity Measures to Secure Another Bailout

February 12, 2012 10:19 PM by Doug Powers

55 Comments

Preview of coming attractions?

More CPAC speeches in 20 words

February 11, 2012 06:53 PM by Michelle Malkin

75 Comments

US State Department Expands Travel Warning for Mexico

February 11, 2012 03:29 PM by Doug Powers

43 Comments

War zones

‘Occupy CPAC’ Protester Paid $60 a Day

February 10, 2012 02:32 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Living wage?

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

February 10, 2012 09:06 AM by Michelle Malkin

199 Comments


Categories: Politics

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook