Obama’s weather czar: Goodbye, thermostat control. Hello, “climate geoengineering”

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 8, 2009 01:07 PM


Photo source: Project Earth

This is not a joke:

The president’s new science adviser said Wednesday that global warming is so dire, the Obama administration is discussing radical technologies to cool Earth’s air.

John Holdren told The Associated Press in his first interview since being confirmed last month that the idea of geoengineering the climate is being discussed. One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays. Holdren said such an experimental measure would only be used as a last resort.

“It’s got to be looked at,” he said. “We don’t have the luxury of taking any approach off the table.”

…At first, Holdren characterized the potential need to technologically tinker with the climate as just his personal view. However, he went on to say he has raised it in administration discussions.

Next up: The elimination of spring and summer!

***

Just fyi, this idea of “intentional large scale manipulation of the global environment” has advocates on both the left and right.

Posted in: Enviro-nitwits

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Evangelical Ecologist Blog - Conservative Christians and the Environment
  2. Whitehouse Solves Issue Of Too Much Garbage « Vets On The Watch
  3. Obama-rama in Europe! The President who keeps on giving: Way to go - Obama ticks off the Europeans « Jim Blazsik
  4. Obama’s new weather czar: Global warming is so dire that we may start shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays! | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  5. The Arrogance of Man | Pirates! Man Your Women!
  6. Obama’s Dr. Frankenstein: John Holdren « Danishova
  7. Obama administration considers “climate engineering” « Wellsy’s World
  8. Not Getting It; Obama loses touch with reality, supporting Turkey’s EU push « Northern Thoughts And Reflections
  9. ChooseTheHero.com » Blog Archive » I Apologize For My Nation
  10. More Global Warming Hysteria « The Underground Conservative
  11. Earth Day & Air Force One: Obama’s ‘Carbon Footprint’ Grows Again While He Embraces Junk Science « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  12. Rush Limbaugh & Charlton Heston: The Vanity and Arrogance of Earth Day, Global Warming, and Climate Change « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  13. Weatherman Takes on MSNBC for Its Global Warming Arrogance, Al Gore Lies about Money Pocketed from Global Warming Crusade « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  14. Leapfrogging Powers! Waxman Says He Will Jump Over Subcommittee to Ram through Controversial Climate Change Bill « Frugal Café Blog Zone

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #101
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, William said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:18 pm, John Deaux said:
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:14 pm, William said:
    Darwinism-evolutionism as 100% fact while Intelligent Design is mocked as religion, Creationism, and anti-science.

    He didn’t mean it ZA, really he didn’t. He’s drunk. Yeah, that’s it, he stinkin drunk.

    Who is ZA?

    I wouldn’t be the person who is drunk. I do not drink any alcoholic beverages whatsoever, not even while toasting at a wedding reception. I just don’t like them, their taste, etc., and I have no use for them.

    William

  2. #102
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:39 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:35 pm, William said:

    I was just having a little fun at zeroangel’s expense. He was involved in a couple of long threads defending Darwinism.

    As far as the drinking, I’m sure chapoutier drink enough for the both of you. See, it’s all about balance.

  3. #103
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, sonofdy said:

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real. Making fun of them doesn’t make you look good.

    So solving a “problem” (hint, look at the ice levels, they have returned to 1970 levels) caused by crap in the air they plan to shoot MORE crap into the air.

    And you think this is a GOOD idea???

    REALLY??? :shock:

  4. #104
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, minpinmom said:

    Someone else has probably noted this, but I would have thought with all the tin-foil hats in use that the sun’s rays would be deflected thus causing a cooling trend.

  5. #105
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:43 pm, MuscleDaddy said:

    Reflect the sun’s…

    Aw, HELL no!

    Someone’s gone and started using movie plots as policy propositions!

    Killer Asteroid?
    “The administration has sent out a formal request to Bruce Willis…”

    – MuscleDaddy

  6. #106
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Actually, folks, this IS NOT rocket science. Follow the money….just follow the money right into the pockets of Obama and all his ecomaniacal friends. If this wasn’t so sick, I’d be laughing.
    On second thought, thanks Twofoot #19, everything FlyoverMan said, and Roman Con #31 – You are sooo funny!!

  7. #107
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, sonofdy said:

    MuscleDaddy
    I KNEW I had seen it in a crappy movie somewhere.

  8. #108
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:46 pm, RedDog said:

    Between all the commentary here as well as from the Obama administration…. I am bent over in tears laughing.

    When the reality sinks in that these freaks running the government are serious, the tears will be from sheer terror.

  9. #109
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, zeroangel said:

    John:

    I am too busy at work to bother, besides I said I wouldn’t anymore. I will mention one or two things though since you called me by name.

    William:

    I am the resident libertarian atheist.

    I reccomend Jerry Coyne’s “Why Evolution is True.” If you are serious about learning you should check it out.

    I recommended the same to John.

    The “right-wing” opposition to evolution makes “us” look uneducated and foolish. Even the Catholic Church accepts evolution as a truth. This doesn’t mean there isn’t room for god anymore, it just means (at the least) he used a complex method. Personally, I don’t think a “god” that messes around with dinosaurs makes any sense unless you believe he used evolution as the method.

  10. #110
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:48 pm, William said:

    … BTW, Hawaii has had an unusually cold winter which someone actually tried to tell me was proof of warming…

    April 8th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, AlohaGuy

    AlohaGuy,

    My wife and I married outdoors, overlooking the sea and Molokini Crater at sunset in Makena, Maui, Hawaii.

    This past September 2008 we revisited Maui, this time with our four children – two girls, two boys, ages 11 through 6 months – in tow, showing them where we married, and visiting different parts of the island, even staying in Hana at a private property all to ourselves. They LOVED Maui and want to live there! They loved the ocean, and loved playing in the waves. Our 11 year old daughter, for comfort, held my hand and went snorkeling with me at Ulua Beach as well, snorkeling for the first time in her life, and she LOVED it. She saw amazing fish and even a small octopus at the coral reef that we swam out to.

    I LOVE Maui and Kauai!

    When we were in Maui in September I did not notice if the weather was unusual for Hawaii.

    Aloha Guy, from experience there is one thing I know is a typical behavior from Global Warming cultists, and the general public who swallow their swill, they WILL tell you that, if the temperature is high and hot, then it is due to Global Warming, and, the reverse, if the temperature is low and cold it is also due to Global Warming.

    Whatever takes place, increase in rain fall, reduction in rain fall, increase in snow fall, decrease in snow fall, hot, cold, plants grow, they don’t grow, and on and on, it is ALL due to Global Warming.

    That begs the question, what ISN’T caused by Global Warming?

    Aloha!

    Maui no ka oi!

    William

  11. #111
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://projectearth.com/HTML/EditorialArchive/global_cooling.html

    It gets worse. They are chemtrail conspriacy nuts as well. According th the project earth guys, WE ARE ALREADY DOING THIS!!!

    :shock:

    LOL

  12. #112
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    The facts;

    Cro-magnum man is 40,000 years old.
    the earth is 4.5 billion years old.
    First weather records kept by James Tilton was in 1814. We have about 200 years of weather records which represents 0.5% of the time man has been on the earth. So how many billions or trillions are we throwing at this? Somebody’s gonna get rich off of this scam!!!!!! I wonder if these particles in the atmosphere will cause permanent winter? I doubt they have thought it out…

  13. #113
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:29 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, lgm said:

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real.

    Prove it

    There’s consensus, doncha know? All you have to do is train yourself to ignore all those who disagree with you, and ignore countervailing facts and analysis (or apply sophomoric rhetorical tactics against them) and voila, consensus.

  14. #114
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:52 pm, jbh45 said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 1:28 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:
    because I like the idea of having mercury around because of how much it drives my “eco-aware” friends crazy.
    We broke a thermostat in 8th grade science class that was sitting on the bookshelf right next to us. We played with those little balls of mercury all year long.

    Did I forget to mention that friable asbestos covered our ceilings and we were always throwing things up there to make them stick?

    I dont think any of us have died yet.

    Yep, but now in CA when this happens they shut the building down for a week. Remove the carpet, the furniture, purify the airducts, and spend a cool $100k without blinking an eye. If you think I am joking, I’m not. I saw a recent claim where this very thing happened. Later upon claim review the enviro “expert” said it may have been an over-reaction.

    Yeah, right.

  15. #115
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, travlinman said:

    I can almost hear Rod Serling welcoming us to the Twilight Zone…

    I pray that we can hold on until early November 2010 and that we send a clear message to the loony-tunes crowd about how they are destroying our country.

  16. #116
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:56 pm, Hannibal said:

    one such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays

    John Holdren stated that, “while this solution may be expensive and add to our deficit, the Obama administration has plans to cut the deficit by using less expensive Chinese pollution particles. The Chinese produce high quality pollution particles at a much lower per particle cost than American pollution particles which have excessive management pay and union legacy costs attached. This is a free country and it is not unpatriotic to shoot foreign pollution particles as long as you like the quality and the price”.

  17. #117
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:57 pm, thetoysurgeon said:

    Its not enough Obama wants to control everything here in the USA if not the world . Now he wants to play the deity he knows he can be by controlling the weather. Whats next, walking on water?
    What an egomaniac! Maybe he wants to destroy agriculture so he can command the starving masses.

  18. #118
    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:58 pm, spaceycakes said:

    I think it’s a good time to bring out this quote again…

    “The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” C. S. Lewis

    (emphasis mine)

  19. #119
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:03 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:47 pm, zeroangel said:
    John:

    I am too busy at work to bother, besides I said I wouldn’t anymore.

    As I said, I was just having fun at your expense.

    Good to see you’re still around.

  20. #120
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, zeroangel said:

    John:

    Yah. I am still here. I wouldn’t leave MM’s site; it gives a good counter-balance for other things out there.

    Have you picked up the book yet? I really hope you do. It’s suposed to be very good and concise.

  21. #121
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:09 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:51 pm, sonofdy said:

    http://projectearth.com/HTML/EditorialArchive/global_cooling.html

    It gets worse. They are chemtrail conspriacy nuts as well. According th the project earth guys, WE ARE ALREADY DOING THIS!!!

    :shock:

    LOL

    I’ve literally worked on thousands of aircraft and on each and every one I’ve found a ‘chemtrail producing device’

    They’re called ENGINES! :o

  22. #122
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:16 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 2:27 pm, docflash said:
    This is the kind of acid flashback ideas you get when the Woodstock (my)generation is in charge.Before it is over we will be hearing about the pretty colors from the shooting particles.

    All I can think of is Tommy Chong saying: “Watch me turn this napkin and this glass, into a piece of fruit! (wraps napkin around glass into a phallic shape) Ain’t it a peach?!

  23. #123
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:18 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, zeroangel said:

    Have you picked up the book yet? I really hope you do. It’s suposed to be very good and concise.

    Not yet, but I will. Right now, I have three queued up, but I’ll get to it.

  24. #124
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, zeroangel said:

    John:

    Glad to hear it. Hopefully we can continue our discussion afterwards.

    Have a good evening.

  25. #126
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, Cameron said:

    So we have gone from “Bringing science back to the White House” to setting up global warming as the official religion of this country.

  26. #128
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Isn’t there actual scientific evidence that we are not warming, but are indeed COOLING? I thought there was actual concrete proof of that!

  27. #129
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:37 pm, sonofdy said:
  28. #130
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, lgm said:

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real. Making fun of them doesn’t make you look good.

    lgm, please explain the following:

    1) Since 1998 global temperatures have cooled each year. Why?
    2) If you historically correlate the earth’s temperature overall with the amount of CO2, water vapor, methane, soot and anything else you can measure only one measurement correlates with the earth’s temperature; solar activity. What does that tell you?
    3) Since the end of thelast Ice Age 18,000 years ago, temperatures have gone up and down annually, but the amount of CO2 has increased without any correlation to temperature. What does that imply?
    4) NASA has measured the temperature variations of 9 solar system planets and moons. All of their annual temperature variations correlate to each other and Earth’s. What does that tell you?
    5) It was revealed that a large number of temperature recording devices are located in urban areas. What impact might htat have on their readings?
    6) NASA recently admitted its sensors under recorded amount of Arctic Ice for the last few years by an area the size of Califiornia. What does that imply?
    7) Prior to the Little Ice Age from @1300 – 1800, it was so warm that Greenland was farmed and grapes grew in Northern Scotland. How small do you think the Arctic Ice Cap got? The Gulf Stream was unaffected? Why wasn’t it? And best of all despite this period of warm weather with no humans to protect them, the polar bear did not go extinct. Givcen the warmth of the Arctic region how did the polar bear survive?

    You have the floor, sir.

  29. #131
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:47 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:43 pm, Flyoverman

    Let me channel “lgm”:

    “Bush has a lot of explaining to do, doesn’t he?”

  30. #132
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:53 pm, torabora said:

    Commiefornia is implementing new diesel regulations to take soot OUT of the air. There is even an idea to use giant fans in the LA area to scrub the air of soot.

    That stupid SOB should have been a private in the army where there is much fondness for digging holes and then putting the dirt back into the hole.

    sheesh, moi stupido

  31. #133
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, lgm said:

    John Deaux said (#96):

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real.

    Prove it.

    This is asking me to prove that vaccinations prevent disease. You could refuse to accept consensus, blame it on profit hungry drug companies, etc. But the real world accepts the benefits of vaccinations and the dangers of global warming.

  32. #134
    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, graysonret said:

    Thank you, flyoverman. May I add that if no-one believes that grapes/wine was grown in Scotland, they can always check many old village street names there. (Vineyard names). I always ask people…why did they name that island “Greenland”? Not for the ice, I’m sure. In 1000 A.D., we had a lot of “global warming” which was a boon to agriculture and exploration. Famines in Europe were ended. Why is it that the earth warms, THEN co2 goes up; not vice-versa. It’s all about power and money. When the money and power dries up, they will switch to global cooling. I once listened to an 80 year old man, who remarked how frightened he was, as a child in the ’30s, going to the movies and seeing newsreels about global warming and, especially, the extinction of polar bears. He ran home to his mother, all upset. Yes, they had more than one global warming scare, with cooling mixed in. It’s a great money-maker, like the asteriods hitting us, between the Yellowstone volcano,tsunamis on the east coast and major earthquakes, not to mention aliens, wiping us all out, any day now. I live in the tidewater region of Virginia. Aren’t we supposed to be underwater by 30-50 feet by now? They said so, several years ago.

  33. #135
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, lgm said:

    I strongly recommend the Nizkor project to you in general (as I think you, and many like you, could benefit from it quite a lot), but at least look at this page and this page.

  34. #136
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:07 pm, sonofdy said:

    You could refuse to accept consensus

    THERE IS NO CONSENSUS.

    Just because al gore and his small hand picked set of scientist who already agreed with him say one thing, doesn’t mean it is true.

    In fact its a flat out lie.

  35. #137
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, lgm said:

    John Deaux said (#96):

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real.

    Prove it.

    This is asking me to prove that vaccinations prevent disease. You could refuse to accept consensus, blame it on profit hungry drug companies, etc. But the real world accepts the benefits of vaccinations and the dangers of global warming.

    Um, no it isn’t. There would be overwhelming imperical evidence showing a significant warming trend that has increased for several years, if not decades.

    A mere 30 years ago, average global temps cooled so much they talked of a second ice age.

    Since 2001, we’ve also seen cooling, rather than warming.

    The only people who take “global warming” seriously aren’t living in the “real world” – they’re living in a fantasy land wherein they get to control the lives of others for the sake of “saving the planet.”

  36. #138
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, jjmurphy said:

    I live in the tidewater region of Virginia. Aren’t we supposed to be underwater by 30-50 feet by now? They said so, several years ago.

    I live in central NC. I am supposed to be beachfront property by now. What the heck happened?

  37. #139
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, lgm said:

    This is asking me to prove that vaccinations prevent disease.

    I believe lgm, that proving the sun rises in the east MIGHT be the only thing easier to prove from a scientific standpoint. The reductuion in disease due to vaccination is measureable and demonstrable. Seen any smallpox or polio victims lately?

    Consensus is a discipline used in the poltical and social areas of studies. The Scientific Method calls for conclusions based on observation, measurement and when required experimentation with an active and control group.

    My post 124 is based on those principles. As I said, you have the floor.

  38. #140
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, frontierguy said:

    This is like everything else the government gets involved in, that being money. If there is a small problem, the government gives it little or no money. Or…a big problem. Lots of money, the Dems are famous for “fixing” things by throwing money at it. The people who gain money through crisis engineering are really good at it. Smoking, obesity, homelessness, Global cooling then Global warming then Climate Change. Climate Change thugs have really given a lot of scientists a hard time for not towing the line. Was not a high ranking guy at the Weather Channel fired for saying he thought Global Warming was bull? The lefty trolls in here yelled at us because Bush was leading through fear. Obama has been the biggest fear monger ever.

  39. #141
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 4:57 pm, graysonret said:

    I live in the tidewater region of Virginia. Aren’t we supposed to be underwater by 30-50 feet by now? They said so, several years ago.

    Go to the mirror and check your cheeks for gill slits. If none are present, you are still on dry ground and good to go. ;)

  40. #142
    On April 8th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    The consensus here is that lgm is sitting on his brain, that it has never been used and still in the original packaging…

  41. #143
    On April 8th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, cicerokid said:

    These people are f*&^$(*g retarded. Without doubt, absoultely lacking in any type of real, logical thoughts. This is the result of money for nothing for research. Paid hacks.

    They suppose themselves to be above God, to be able to “fix our climate”.

    God help us.

  42. #145
    On April 8th, 2009 at 7:00 pm, CO2 Producer said:

    Socioengineering, econoengineering, now geoengineering. Ultimate goal: omniversoengineering.

    You know somebody wants to try it. Others will undoubtedly take heed and consider the possibilities.

  43. #146
    On April 8th, 2009 at 7:02 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    This is called terraforming, and the only time I’ve seen it, Sigourney Weaver had to kill plenty of aliens.

  44. #147
    On April 8th, 2009 at 7:15 pm, oldbuckaroo said:

    I think a humongous pait of Blu-Blocker sunglasses would do the trick.

  45. #150
    On April 8th, 2009 at 7:48 pm, Speakup said:

    One such extreme option includes shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays.

    The Matrix comes true.

  46. #151
    On April 8th, 2009 at 7:50 pm, jamesgreenidge said:

    Huh. It’s like being part of the Gullible Warning — er, Global Warming crowd makes you feel snugly more of a hero than the grunt in Iraqi ducking fanatic bullets while teaching a paltry number of kids because your concern gets to save an ENTIRE Planet! Wow, Captain Planet!

    I wonder how much these volcanoes of late have been contributing to the “warming” over ours! Hello MSM?

    James Greenidge
    Queens, NY

  47. #152
    On April 8th, 2009 at 8:48 pm, Lee Hazel said:

    This is truly insanity. Meglomania on a scale that dwarfs even a Roman Emporer.

    That these people believe that given our present understanding of climate dynamics and the inability to adaquately model such a sytem that we should fool around with it is Idiotic.

    Just for grins look at some simple stats:

    Atmospheric mass = 4.5 millionbillion metric tons.
    CO2 mass =

  48. #153
    On April 8th, 2009 at 8:53 pm, Mercy4Me said:

    I swear to myself these people are idiots.

    Anyone who believes in man made global warming climate or whatever type of change it is now, is also an IDIOT!!

    God

  49. #154
    On April 8th, 2009 at 8:55 pm, PKAmmoTroop said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 3:26 pm, lgm said:

    Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real. Making fun of them doesn’t make you look good.

    I’m getting so sick of you reality deniers.

    The sun was highly active up until 1998 – the earth warmed as did all the other planets.

    The sun entered an inactive period starting in 1998, the earth has began to cool, as are all the other planets.

    No amount of delusional proselytizing, or paranoiac babbling is going to change that. Neither is singing Kum-Bai_Ya, wearing Birkenstocks or worshiping some made up earth goddess. And neither is taking statistical data and calling it Science.

    Science is cause and effect, not worshiping at the feet of Al Gore and his shot full of holes imagination created PowerPoint slide show. You and your pathetic brain washed brethren have been hoodwinked into believing that a trace element making up less than 0.0035% of the atmosphere is causing global warming and none of you have the guts to realize that the people still pushing this global warming lie while the Earth slowly turns into an ice ball are making MILLION$ of dollars off of your gullibility.

    Wake up! Smell the coffee! It’s a huge money making scam and You Got Took! Took so bad you elected the imaginary Nigerian prince as president.

    But then you can’t fix stupid.

  50. #155
    On April 8th, 2009 at 9:07 pm, plymouthacclaim said:

    Honestly, you’d think George Noory was the President’s science advisor.

    Actually, that’s not fair to George, since I think he doesn’t believe in anthropogenic global warming.

  51. #156
    On April 8th, 2009 at 9:34 pm, beenthere said:

    Just when you think this Administration has gone has far as it possibly can go, if you just wait a bit, it tops itself.

    Yes, spraying dust and gas and stuff into the air will have a cooling affect, volcanoes (e.g. Penitubo, Krakatoa) do it all the time. But for humans to try and replicate and control such a phenomena using god-knows-what means on that scale? That would cost trillions. Whoops, no problem. I forgot.

    But instead of a DIY volcano, why not send robot probes to small asteroids (say a kilometer in diameter) and nudge them on a collision course with earth (Sahara)? Upon colliding they would kick up a lot of dust and make for some really cool explosions. Do this every few years or so.

    Think big. Think very big. The Might “O” is.

  52. #157
    On April 8th, 2009 at 9:50 pm, tbear44 said:

    If anyone tells you it is getting warmer in Alaska; I have lived here for 35 years and it’s as cold as it ever has been. Record cold in Anchorage last summer. Same thing for Seattle winters the last 3 years. Oh, it must be “climate change” now.

  53. #158
    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:
    lgm said:Global warming and attempts to deal with it are serious and real.

    John Deaux said (#96):
    Prove it.

    This is asking me to prove that vaccinations prevent disease.

    I guess the better terminology in keeping with the vacination analogy – show us some DATA THAT SUPPORTS THE CLAIM.

    For vaccines, it is SIMPLE to produce mortality data of a given disease before and after the introduction of the vaccine to suggest that it had an affect.

    But with global warming, the alarmists have not offered ONE SINGLE PIECE OF MEASURABLE EVIDENCE to support the claim that human CO2 from fossil fuel causes global warming… not one.

    Conversely, we are now armed to the HILT with evidence CONTRARY to your claim. Going with your analogy it would be like seeing an INCREASE, triple the number of polio cases, after the vaccine was introduced.

    Sure, still no way to PROVE that the vaccine did it but doesn’t it make sense to STOP the vaccine to see what happens?

    This is where you flat earth alarmists are at right NOW. OPPOSITE to what the IPCC and your computer programming twit James Hansen predicted, it has RAPIDLY been getting cooler for the last 7 years, over the last three years the rate of sea level rise has decreased and hordes of killer storms that Gore scared everyone about failed to materialize. All that while CO2 just kept going … UP! You are like the black knight in Monty Python’s Holy Grail. We’ve cut off your arms and legs but you keep saying you haven’t even started fighting yet.

    The whole thing is a LIE and never made any sense to me from the first day I heard it. There is simply too LITTLE of CO2 to make any huge difference.

  54. #159
    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    graysonret said: Aren’t we supposed to be underwater by 30-50 feet by now? They said so, several years ago.

    What’s hilarious is that Bangladesh, one of the countries that Gore said would be under water real soon and cause ‘mass migration’ is actually GAINING land at the coast! The idiot never considered… river silt, (any maybe a little geologic uplift as well).

  55. #160
    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:33 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Testimony of John Coleman to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands April 7

    …Scientists with an anti-fossil fuel agenda developed a theory of radiative forcing to explain how this trace gas could create runaway greenhouse warming. They put that theory into general circulation computer models. Their models then projected a continuous rapid rise in global temperatures year after year. In the 1980s and 1990’s the models seemed on track as temperatures climbed. But in 1998 the warming stopped. By 2002 a rapid cooling had begun. That cooling continues today. The computer proof has failed. It has become clear the warming in the 80s and 90s was at the peak of a solar cycle and now that the sun has gone very quiet, cooling has gripped the planet. Yet the models continue to predict warming that is not happening. There is no significant warming from CO2. ….

  56. #161
    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:44 pm, Send_Me said:

    These people aren’t breathing pure air…

  57. #162
    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:49 pm, jangar said:

    Just fyi, this idea of “intentional large scale manipulation of the global environment” has advocates on both the left and right.

    Failure to not recognize that there is a God much larger than yourself results in such insane beliefs.

  58. #163
    On April 8th, 2009 at 11:28 pm, CleanGuy said:

    But if the Redoubt volcano blows enough ash into the atmosphere that there is global cooling, it will give the left some more ammunition against Gov. Palin.

  59. #164
    On April 8th, 2009 at 11:29 pm, HotWeaver said:

    Three words: Environmental Impact Statement.

  60. #165
    On April 8th, 2009 at 11:46 pm, laggarticus said:

    Weren’t they calling for idiotic measures like this in the 19070’s to curb Global Cooling?

  61. #166
    On April 8th, 2009 at 11:46 pm, Cal City Conservative said:

    On April 8th, 2009 at 10:25 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    graysonret said: Aren’t we supposed to be underwater by 30-50 feet by now? They said so, several years ago.

    What’s hilarious is that Bangladesh, one of the countries that Gore said would be under water real soon and cause ‘mass migration’ is actually GAINING land at the coast! The idiot never considered… river silt, (any maybe a little geologic uplift as well).

    Along those lines I’m sure everyone here has taken note that anything the GOREACLE has ordained has never come to pass.

    Why do all their hokey schemes seem to always get a pass? As someone said just follow the money. Has Gore ever cut back his lifestyle? No way that is for the serfs to do not the masters.

  62. #167
    On April 9th, 2009 at 1:18 am, fulldroolcup said:

    LGM:

    This is asking me to prove that vaccinations prevent disease.

    You fracking dumbass. It is easy to “prove” that vaccination prevents the diseases it is made to prevent.

    Take public health data on, say, the incidence of polio, before vaccines are administered to the general population, and then take the data aferwards over a number of years.

    Do this everywhre in the planet where large populations got the vaccine.

    Gosh!!! What do you learn pre- and post??

    People who got the vaccine don’t get the disease.

    That’s why Americans don’t get about a half-dozen diseases that used to kill people, especially kids, a hundred years ago.

    And no bullbleep, please, about that not
    being “proof”, which applies only to mathematics.

    It’s just evidence, iron-clad evidence of the type that SCIENTISTS and normal people understand.

    Too bad there’s no vaccine against STUPIDITY, lgm.

    Too bad for you, that is.

  63. #168
    On April 9th, 2009 at 1:27 am, fulldroolcup said:

    OK, so I’m Canada and Russia, and Barack comes along and says “Brother, for the planetary good we’re going to shorten your seasons for raising crops so that we down here the USA can avoid having to deal with brutal heat about 1 degree higher than “normal”.”

    The Canadians (having had their backbones forcibly ripped from them by their socialist squish government) will, of course, take their threatened national impoverishment supinely — but will the nuclear-armed Russkies???

  64. #169
    On April 9th, 2009 at 8:05 am, jones said:

    Does “Cane Toad” ring a bell here?

  65. #170
    On April 9th, 2009 at 8:24 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    It simply AMAZES ME that there really are people who persist in defending the theory of CO2 causing ‘global warming’ even when YOU SHOVE CONTRARY DATA LIKE THIS RIGHT IN THEIR FACE?

    Anyone who refuses to accept the reality of that comparison is either a total IDIOT, a LUNATIC or someone who stands to profit from the SCAM.

  66. #171
    On April 9th, 2009 at 8:26 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Here’s SOME MORE DATA CONTRARY TO AGW fer ya lgm.

  67. #172
    On April 9th, 2009 at 10:01 am, lgm said:

    fulldroolcup said (#158):

    You fracking dumbass.

    You frakkin’ skinjob cylon.

    It is easy to “prove” that vaccination prevents the diseases it is made to prevent.

    You might think so, but there are anti vaccine forces who dispute this data.

    Danceswithdachshunds said (#162):

    Here’s SOME MORE DATA CONTRARY TO AGW fer ya

    Hey, Dance, I’m assuming you yourself are not an expert on climate science. That puts you in the same position as me, having to rely on experts. All arguments you’re making are being made at scientific meetings of climate scientists, where they are discussed and rebutted by experts. It they held water, we would hear about it. Turns out that they don’t.

  68. #173
    On April 9th, 2009 at 10:29 am, englishqueen01 said:

    Don’t know why my response won’t post, so let me try it again.

    That puts you in the same position as me, having to rely on experts.

    Ah, “experts”, including notorious global-warming liar Al Gore?

    What about these actual experts who don’t believe in or question global warming.

    Believe global warming is not occurring or has ceased

    * Timothy F. Ball, former Professor of Geography, University of Winnipeg: “[The world's climate] warmed from 1680 up to 1940, but since 1940 it’s been cooling down. The evidence for warming is because of distorted records. The satellite data, for example, shows cooling.” (November 2004)[5] “There’s been warming, no question. I’ve never debated that; never disputed that. The dispute is, what is the cause. And of course the argument that human CO2 being added to the atmosphere is the cause just simply doesn’t hold up…” (May 18, 2006; at 15:30 into recording of interview)[6] “The temperature hasn’t gone up. … But the mood of the world has changed: It has heated up to this belief in global warming.” (August 2006)[7] “Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970’s global cooling became the consensus. … By the 1990’s temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I’ll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global temperature trends now indicate a cooling.” (Feb. 5, 2007)[8]

    * Robert M. Carter, geologist, researcher at the Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University in Australia: “the accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998 … there is every doubt whether any global warming at all is occurring at the moment, let alone human-caused warming.”[9]

    * Vincent R. Gray, coal chemist, founder of the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition: “The two main ’scientific’ claims of the IPCC are the claim that ‘the globe is warming’ and ‘Increases in carbon dioxide emissions are responsible’. Evidence for both of these claims is fatally flawed.”[10]

    Believe cause of global warming is unknown

    * Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and Founding Director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks: “[T]he method of study adopted by the International Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is fundamentally flawed, resulting in a baseless conclusion: Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations. Contrary to this statement …, there is so far no definitive evidence that ‘most’ of the present warming is due to the greenhouse effect. … [The IPCC] should have recognized that the range of observed natural changes should not be ignored, and thus their conclusion should be very tentative. The term ‘most’ in their conclusion is baseless.”[44]

    * Claude Allègre, geochemist, Institute of Geophysics (Paris): “The increase in the CO2 content of the atmosphere is an observed fact and mankind is most certainly responsible. In the long term, this increase will without doubt become harmful, but its exact role in the climate is less clear. Various parameters appear more important than CO2. Consider the water cycle and formation of various types of clouds, and the complex effects of industrial or agricultural dust. Or fluctuations of the intensity of the solar radiation on annual and century scale, which seem better correlated with heating effects than the variations of CO2 content.”[45]
    * Robert C. Balling, Jr., a professor of geography at Arizona State University: “[I]t is very likely that the recent upward trend [in global surface temperature] is very real and that the upward signal is greater than any noise introduced from uncertainties in the record. However, the general error is most likely to be in the warming direction, with a maximum possible (though unlikely) value of 0.3 °C. … At this moment in time we know only that: (1) Global surface temperatures have risen in recent decades. (2) Mid-tropospheric temperatures have warmed little over the same period. (3) This difference is not consistent with predictions from numerical climate models.”[46]
    * John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports: “I’m sure the majority (but not all) of my IPCC colleagues cringe when I say this, but I see neither the developing catastrophe nor the smoking gun proving that human activity is to blame for most of the warming we see. Rather, I see a reliance on climate models (useful but never “proof”) and the coincidence that changes in carbon dioxide and global temperatures have loose similarity over time.”[47]
    * Petr Chylek, Space and Remote Sensing Sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory: “carbon dioxide should not be considered as a dominant force behind the current warming…how much of the [temperature] increase can be ascribed to CO2, to changes in solar activity, or to the natural variability of climate is uncertain”[48]
    * William R. Cotton, Professor of Atmospheric Sciences at Colorado State University said in a presentation, “It is an open question if human produced changes in climate are large enough to be detected from the noise of the natural variability of the climate system.”[49]
    * Chris de Freitas, Associate Professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland: “There is evidence of global warming. … But warming does not confirm that carbon dioxide is causing it. Climate is always warming or cooling. There are natural variability theories of warming. To support the argument that carbon dioxide is causing it, the evidence would have to distinguish between human-caused and natural warming. This has not been done.”[50]
    * David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma: “The amount of climatic warming that has taken place in the past 150 years is poorly constrained, and its cause – human or natural – is unknown. There is no sound scientific basis for predicting future climate change with any degree of certainty. If the climate does warm, it is likely to be beneficial to humanity rather than harmful. In my opinion, it would be foolish to establish national energy policy on the basis of misinformation and irrational hysteria.”[51]
    * Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences: “We are quite confident (1) that global mean temperature is about 0.5 °C higher than it was a century ago; (2) that atmospheric levels of CO2 have risen over the past two centuries; and (3) that CO2 is a greenhouse gas whose increase is likely to warm the earth (one of many, the most important being water vapor and clouds). But – and I cannot stress this enough – we are not in a position to confidently attribute past climate change to CO2 or to forecast what the climate will be in the future.”[52] “[T]here has been no question whatsoever that CO2 is an infrared absorber (i.e., a greenhouse gas – albeit a minor one), and its increase should theoretically contribute to warming. Indeed, if all else were kept equal, the increase in CO2 should have led to somewhat more warming than has been observed.”[53]

    That’s quite a list, and an incomplete one at that.

    I don’t suppose you’ll see the irony in claiming global warming is irrefutably proven while you simultaneously say about vaccines:

    You might think so, but there are anti vaccine forces who dispute this data.

    There are lots of experts who dispute the data concerning global warming, its causes, and its effects.

    Yet, since it doesn’t fit your narrative, and stands in the way of liberal justification for further control over our lives, they don’t matter, right?

  69. #174
    On April 9th, 2009 at 11:31 am, zeroangel said:

    LGM:

    The problem I have with global warming is as follows:

    I simply don’t see how we can be so certain. That is to say, evolution, vaccines, relativity, and even quantum mechanics (to a point) make sense to me.

    With global warming I just don’t see how we could possibly have enough data to conclude that humans are responsible. Since you subscribe to this idea you must have SOME idea, right?

    I mean, you just don’t accept it at face value because experts say so, do you? It’s never been sufficiently described to me and I have yet to see a global warming advocate that puts forward anything more than “it’s a scientific consensus.”

    This (from wiki) is key to me:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming#Climate_models

    The main tools for projecting future climate changes are computer models of the climate. These models are based on physical principles including fluid dynamics and radiative transfer. Although they attempt to include as many processes as possible, simplifications of the actual climate system are inevitable because of the constraints of available computer power and limitations in knowledge of the climate system.

    It’s not a hard and true fact. It’s like predicting the weather. Sure, it might be close, and I have little doubt that human beings are responsible for at least some part of global warming (though it might be insignificant), but I don’t know if it’s significant enough to institute radical changes over it.

  70. #175
    On April 9th, 2009 at 11:54 am, englishqueen01 said:

    It’s like predicting the weather.

    And weather isn’t predictable. We’re also forgetting that for all of earth’s history, we’ve only been recording temperatures for 150 years or so.

    So the data is an extremely small sample from a very large pool; how do we not know there weren’t warming and cooling trends before men started keeping track of the weather?

  71. #176
    On April 9th, 2009 at 12:22 pm, HotWeaver said:

    Englishqueen01: We do know there was warming and cooling before weather records. The press won’t report that. Just as the press is reporting that a bit of ice broke free in Antarctica but won’t report that it’s surrounded by a lot more ice than average.

    Yeah, Antarctic ice has been increasing. That’s not reported. A miniscule piece breaks loose and it gets headlines.

  72. #177
    On April 9th, 2009 at 12:25 pm, Sniper One said:

    This is pure arrogance. If there is no arthorprogenic global warming, then how do you expect to undo it? If man can’t cause the planet to warm, why worry about trying to make it cool.

    Besides, Mount Redoubt is spewing “greenhouse” gasses faster than man is anyway…

  73. #178
    On April 9th, 2009 at 1:35 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    LGM: Hey, Dance, I’m assuming you yourself are not an expert on climate science. That puts you in the same position as me, having to rely on experts. All arguments you’re making are being made at scientific meetings of climate scientists, where they are discussed and rebutted by experts. It they held water, we would hear about it. Turns out that they don’t

    RUBBISH!!! It DOES ‘hold water’ and we DO NOT hear about it because of Oprah Winfrey and General Electric and all the same apparatchiks who elected a totally inexperienced commie president by withholding/misrepresenting the truth from/to the public.

    You have almost ZERO ‘experts’. James Hansen is an astronomer and computer programmer – NOT A CLIMATE GUY. The head of the IPCC, Rajendra Pachauri, is a railroad engineer, (as in choo-choo, ok he’s a chemical engineer but he only worked for the railroad), – NOT A CLIMATE GUY. etc

    On MY side I have mostly PhD’s in climate, geology, physics, chemistry, etc. who signed a letter to Obama :

    We, the undersigned scientists, maintain that the case for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated. Surface temperature changes over the past century have been episodic and modest and there has been no net global warming for over a decade now.1,2 After controlling for population growth and property values, there has been no increase in damages from severe weather-related events.3 The computer models forecasting rapid temperature change abjectly fail to explain recent climate behavior.4 Mr. President, your characterization of the scientific facts regarding climate change and the degree of certainty informing the scientific debate is simply incorrect.

    (Note that Dr. Harry F. Lins is ON the IPCC!)

    Look at that list of signers LGM. WHO do YOU have? HMMM? I don’t want to hear any more of your CRAP that you have ‘experts’ and that they have EVER rebutted a damn thing! I’d simply LOVE to see any of them dispute any point made in that letter.

  74. #179
    On April 9th, 2009 at 1:52 pm, lgm said:

    englishqueen01 said (#164):

    Ah, “experts”, including notorious global-warming liar Al Gore?

    Gore doesn’t claim to be a technical expert, though he surely knows more about it than the average person, you for instance.

    What about these actual experts who don’t believe in or question global warming.

    Your wikipedia list is interesting, but very small considering how many people have the credentials to be on it. For example, MIT has the world’s most distinguished department of atmospheric and climate science. Exactly one of its faculty has doubts. There’s nobody from Princeton or Harvard or Cal Tech or UCLA or any of the other major research centers. It’s not unanimity, but its consensus.

  75. #180
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:04 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Gore doesn’t claim to be a technical expert, though he surely knows more about it than the average person, you for instance.

    Thanks, lgm, for the great laugh! You’re an expert because you blindly believe what some scientists say (despite being proven wrong or contradicted).

    I, at the very least, would make a documentary that got the facts straight, as opposed to the many glaring errors in “An Inconvenient Truth.”

    Also, if Gore really believed in global warming, why does he use cars? Electricity? Planes? Shouldn’t he be the ultimate greenie? Oh, that’s right, those restrictions only apply to folks like me. Not important people like you or Al Gore.

    Your wikipedia list is interesting, but very small considering how many people have the credentials to be on it.

    Okay…so when a small number of people don’t speak out against global warming, it means those who do are correct? Besides, the Wikipedia entry itself says it’s only a partial list. So now if every single scientist who doubts global warming isn’t all over the web, they don’t count? Give me a break.

    Again – where’s your proof?

    Ah, I remember. You can’t “prove” global warming like you can’t “prove” vaccines work. But your logic behind being unable to look at the fact some diseases have all but been eradicated since the dawn of vaccines and conclude that vaccines work is…because a small group of people disagree about the effectiveness of vaccines.

    Wow. :shock:

    Keep spinning. Just make sure you’re not near any hard surfaces when you fall over from all the dizzying (but lacking) logic you’re attempting.

  76. #181
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:14 pm, Reliq6 said:

    englishqueen01 – it’s not “small group of people ” who disagree that vaccines work – it’s

    anti vaccine forces

    Forces!!!

    /shudder

    Sorry lgm – you are not applying logic at all – you are “feeling” that global warming is real because Gore says so. Period. Admit it so we can move along.

  77. #182
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:17 pm, stillontheroad said:

    LGM — you picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue — firing pollutants into the stratosphere, wasn’t it the environuts that complained the Concord polluted same stratosphere and it would cause Global Warming? Be that as it may, you and all your ilk are like walking into an empty room when it comes to any kind of analysis concerning anything that requires any kind of thoughtful research.Global warming that morphed into Climate Change that morphed into climate crisis ad nausea… is one more example of drumming up hysteria over something that cannot be proved. As a further note – I assume you have changed out all those wicked lightbulbs to CFL’s. Where do you throw the bad ones away.

  78. #183
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, zeroangel said:

    LGM:

    I do understand and respect the fact that so many scientists have reached a consensus.

    I guess I am just going to continue to be a skeptic until I get more evidence than computer models everyone admits are incomplete.

    In short, I think it is wise to hold off on any action until we have more evidence and (more importantly) better technology to mitigate any damage that may have been caused. This idea of adding more pollutants seems ill-conceived. I would be more in favor of some kind of atmospheric processing (when the technology becomes available and assuming it is necessary).

  79. #184
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:21 pm, Danceswithdachshunds said:
  80. #185
    On April 9th, 2009 at 2:24 pm, englishqueen01 said:
  81. #186
    On April 9th, 2009 at 6:56 pm, DBNinKY said:

    For example, MIT has the world’s most distinguished department of atmospheric and climate science. Exactly one of its faculty has doubts. There’s nobody from Princeton or Harvard or Cal Tech or UCLA or any of the other major research centers.

    Consensus is but irrelevant group think – especially when the taint of government grants and foundation stipends to study AGW are more acquirable when a consensus of an institution’s or universities science dept believes it actually exists.

    In other words, the institutions you mention as believing in AGW are not credible because they have a vested($) in putting forth the premise that it [AGW] is real.

    And BTW, many of Asia & Europe’s top scientists doubt AGW.

  82. #188
    On April 9th, 2009 at 7:33 pm, mattm said:

    This is even scarier that his thermostat idea. If our cars, factories, etc are polluting you are advocating tossing tons of crap into the atmosphere that will either solve the problem or make the problem 1000 times worse.

  83. #189
    On April 9th, 2009 at 8:10 pm, DBNinKY said:

    Edit: “…vested($) [interest] in putting forth… .”

  84. #190
    On April 10th, 2009 at 8:00 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    Worth a read from American Policy:

    ….Also part of the Temple of Understanding is Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the 1993 UN Earth Summit and now number two man at the United Nations. Strong has said, “isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Strong has owned a ranch in Colorado where he built a Babylonian sun god temple. The ranch became a hotbed of a variety of New-Age religious activities.

    Those who worship at the Temple of Understanding follow the teaching of Peter Singer, the father of animal rights. He wrote, “Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition.” Helen Caldicott, of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a former Soviet KGB front group and a driving force in the Temple, says, “Capitalism is destroying the earth.”

    Now these same people have launched a massive campaign to form an environmental partnership with Christians. Can there be any doubt as to their motivation? Western Culture, with its very foundation in Christianity, is the target. Destroy Christianity and our whole way of life, our laws, our relationships to one another, our humanity, will be destroyed.

    There never really was an actual global warming ‘crisis’ and there never was a global cooling ‘crisis’ in the 70’s either. Those are total INVENTIONS to support AN ATTACK AGENDA that has been around for a long time .. DESTROY THE USA AND WESTERN CULTURE. Read all about it; just Google – “maurice strong” + “al gore” + gaia + “union of concerned scientists” + communist

    Then you’ll start to realize that all of these people must be exposed for who they really are and the harm they intend to bring to us, our sovereignty and our way of life. THEY ARE ALL ENEMIES OF LIBERTY.

  85. #191
    On April 10th, 2009 at 8:14 am, Danceswithdachshunds said:

    This just in, wind power is a bust -

    The European experience is instructive. Denmark, the world’s most wind-intensive nation, with more than 6,000 turbines generating 19% of its electricity, has yet to close a single fossil-fuel plant. It requires 50% more coal-generated electricity to cover wind power’s unpredictability, and pollution and carbon dioxide emissions have risen (by 36% in 2006 alone).

    Now add that to an earlier revelation that solar cells are virtually useless because you can’t use them over or under crops or forest land and the nitwits who advovate “alternative energy” won’t even allow them to be installed where they make even the slightest sense – in the desert.

    The whole thing is just falling apart, BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

  86. #193
    On April 11th, 2009 at 9:19 am, TK-421 said:

    God help us all if this happens… Dont those fools know what they are doing?

    Yes we have done some damage, hell but not ALL OF IT. And we DO NOT have the technologies on hand to change it all over night, doing so is to hold the door up and ask for disaster. The road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.

    You want to fix the problems, how about taking these trillions of dollars we can just throw away and use them to redesign some major cities, use newer building designs, and tram systems in said cities to cut down on the use of the automobile. (but the problems with such a project the Fool in Chife and the Clowns in DC could never solve or do). Hell plant some more trees, say screw you to international law of the Sea and start harvesting the various garbage spills. (For instance in the Pacific ocean is a huge spot where plastic garbage just joins into pile. Claim it and melt it down, you get new raw Material AND help the enviroment.

    The point is, we should help nature to help its self. Not say YOU BETTER DO THIS NATURE OR WE WILL MAKE YOU! Our jumping in rather that allowing it to regulate has caused this mess.

    This is a dangerous game Obama is thinking of playing, one we have no more control over than a run away training hitting a fuel and ammo depot. The Nations of the World, or the words of history will not be kind to us. Provided anyone is even left alive to read it.

  87. #194
    On April 13th, 2009 at 9:16 pm, nlebou said:

    I’m sure someone has already said this but; “It’s not nice to fool with Mother Nature?”

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Obama’s war on fishing?!?!?!

March 9, 2010 05:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

97 Comments | 12 Trackbacks

A wind power cautionary tale

March 2, 2010 12:10 PM by Michelle Malkin

121 Comments | 1 Trackback

Democrat slow learners wake up to EPA power grab

February 23, 2010 11:48 AM by Michelle Malkin

29 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

In defense of Colorado Springs, Pt II

February 23, 2010 10:44 AM by Michelle Malkin

49 Comments | 1 Trackback

Enlightenment.

The global warming scandal of the century deepens

February 15, 2010 09:17 AM by Michelle Malkin

99 Comments | 19 Trackbacks

The Van Jones show comes to Columbia U.

February 9, 2010 12:58 PM by Michelle Malkin

54 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

About that “Green Police” Super Bowl ad

February 8, 2010 01:00 PM by Michelle Malkin

147 Comments | 14 Trackbacks

Last laugh.


Categories: Enviro-nitwits



Pundit & Pundette

» Friday various & sundry

protein wisdom

» Finally!
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook