Yes we have done some damage, hell but not ALL OF IT. And we DO NOT have the technologies on hand to change it all over night, doing so is to hold the door up and ask for disaster. The road to hell is paved with the best of intentions.

You want to fix the problems, how about taking these trillions of dollars we can just throw away and use them to redesign some major cities, use newer building designs, and tram systems in said cities to cut down on the use of the automobile. (but the problems with such a project the Fool in Chife and the Clowns in DC could never solve or do). Hell plant some more trees, say screw you to international law of the Sea and start harvesting the various garbage spills. (For instance in the Pacific ocean is a huge spot where plastic garbage just joins into pile. Claim it and melt it down, you get new raw Material AND help the enviroment.

The point is, we should help nature to help its self. Not say YOU BETTER DO THIS NATURE OR WE WILL MAKE YOU! Our jumping in rather that allowing it to regulate has caused this mess.

This is a dangerous game Obama is thinking of playing, one we have no more control over than a run away training hitting a fuel and ammo depot. The Nations of the World, or the words of history will not be kind to us. Provided anyone is even left alive to read it.

The European experience is instructive. Denmark, the world’s most wind-intensive nation, with more than 6,000 turbines generating 19% of its electricity, has yet to close a single fossil-fuel plant. It requires 50% more coal-generated electricity to cover wind power’s unpredictability, and pollution and carbon dioxide emissions have risen (by 36% in 2006 alone).

Now add that to an earlier revelation that solar cells are virtually useless because you can’t use them over or under crops or forest land and the nitwits who advovate “alternative energy” won’t even allow them to be installed where they make even the slightest sense – in the desert.

The whole thing is just falling apart, BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!

….Also part of the Temple of Understanding is Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the 1993 UN Earth Summit and now number two man at the United Nations. Strong has said, “isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” Strong has owned a ranch in Colorado where he built a Babylonian sun god temple. The ranch became a hotbed of a variety of New-Age religious activities.

Those who worship at the Temple of Understanding follow the teaching of Peter Singer, the father of animal rights. He wrote, “Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition.” Helen Caldicott, of the Union of Concerned Scientists, a former Soviet KGB front group and a driving force in the Temple, says, “Capitalism is destroying the earth.”

Now these same people have launched a massive campaign to form an environmental partnership with Christians. Can there be any doubt as to their motivation? Western Culture, with its very foundation in Christianity, is the target. Destroy Christianity and our whole way of life, our laws, our relationships to one another, our humanity, will be destroyed.

There never really was an actual global warming ‘crisis’ and there never was a global cooling ‘crisis’ in the 70′s either. Those are total INVENTIONS to support AN ATTACK AGENDA that has been around for a long time .. DESTROY THE USA AND WESTERN CULTURE. Read all about it; just Google – “maurice strong” + “al gore” + gaia + “union of concerned scientists” + communist

Then you’ll start to realize that all of these people must be exposed for who they really are and the harm they intend to bring to us, our sovereignty and our way of life. THEY ARE ALL ENEMIES OF LIBERTY.

For example, MIT has the world’s most distinguished department of atmospheric and climate science. Exactly one of its faculty has doubts. There’s nobody from Princeton or Harvard or Cal Tech or UCLA or any of the other major research centers.

Consensus is but irrelevant group think – especially when the taint of government grants and foundation stipends to study AGW are more acquirable when a consensus of an institution’s or universities science dept believes it actually exists.

In other words, the institutions you mention as believing in AGW are not credible because they have a vested($) in putting forth the premise that it [AGW] is real.

And BTW, many of Asia & Europe’s top scientists doubt AGW.

Forces!

Indeed.

“I find your lack of faith disturbing.”