You might be a radicalized rightwing extremist if…

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 15, 2009 10:47 AM

…if you are heading out to a Tea Party today!

Here’s my syndicated column on the DHS hit job. A few may be inclined to give DHS the benefit of the doubt. Andrew McCarthy reminds you of the many reasons why you should not.

***


(Photoshop: Tennyson Hayes)

You might be a “radicalized rightwing extremist” if…
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 200

What and who exactly are President Obama’s homeland security officials afraid of these days? If you are a member of an active conservative group that opposes abortion, favors strict immigration enforcement, lobbies to protect Second Amendment rights, protests big government, advocates federalism, or represents veterans who believe in any of the above, the answer is: You.

DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano has turned her attention away from acts of Islamic jihad on American soil (which she now refers to as “man-caused disasters”). Instead, her department is sounding the alarm over an un-quantified “resurgence” in “rightwing extremism activity.” On April 7, DHS sent a nine-page warning memo to law enforcement offices across the country titled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.”

The report includes a sweeping definition of the threat:

“Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

You cannot ignore the context or the timing of this DHS report. It’s no small coincidence that Napolitano’s agency disseminated the assessment just a week before the nationwide April 15 Tax Day Tea Party protests. The grass-roots events organized by fiscal conservatives, independents, Libertarians, and yes, even some blue Dog Democrats were fueled by the “current economic and political climate” of bipartisan profligate spending and endless taxpayer-funded bailouts. The growing success of the loose-knit movement has invited scorn, ridicule, and fear-mongering from Obama’s supporters. Liberal bloggers have likened the Tea Party movement to neo-Nazis, militias, and even Weather Underground terrorists.

These attempts to demonize the Tea Party movement come on the heels of widespread conservative-bashing over the recent shooting sprees in Pittsburgh and Binghamton, New York. Taking Hillary Clinton’s advice to “never waste a good crisis,” left-wing pundits and analysts have blamed the tragedies on everyone from Rush Limbaugh to Fox News to the NRA.

The DHS spokespeople I talked to on Monday insisted that the report was not a politicized document and that DHS had done similar assessments on “leftwing extremism” in the past. But past domestic terrorism reports have always been very specific in identifying security threats – such as the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front – and very specific in identifying their methods and targets, including repeated physical harassment, arson, and vandalism against pharmaceutical companies, farms, labs, and university researchers.

By contrast, the Obama DHS report is an overarching indictment of conservatives. “Rightwing extremist chatter on the Internet continues to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures,” the assessment warns. When I asked DHS spokeswoman Sara Kuban to explain who was responsible for this “extremist chatter,” she could not and would not name names.

Moreover, the report relies on the work of the left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center to stir anxiety over “disgruntled military veterans” – a citation which gives us valuable insight into how DHS will define “hate-oriented” groups. The SPLC, you see, has designated the venerable American Legion a “hate group” for its stance on immigration enforcement. The report offers zero data, but states with an almost resentful attitude toward protected free speech: “Debates over appropriate immigration levels and enforcement policy generally fall within the realm of protected political speech under the First Amendment, but in some cases, anti-immigration or strident pro-enforcement fervor has been directed against specific groups and has the potential to turn violent.”

“Potential to turn violent?” So did the hysterical fervor whipped up by Capitol Hill over the AIG bonuses, which prompted ugly death threats from across the country. No mention here, though. Not “rightwing” enough. Nor will you see Obama DHS warnings to police and sheriff’s departments about self-proclaimed bank terrorists such as Bruce Marks of the aggressive Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America or the mob activists of ACORN who have committed burglary, stormed corporate executives’ homes, and vowed to conduct “civil disobedience” by “any means necessary” in response to the “current economic and political climate.”

If you can redefine dissenting opinion as “hate,” you can brand your political opponents as “extremists” – and you can marginalize electoral threats. “Antigovernment?” “Pro-enforcement?” “Disgruntled?” Feeling taxed enough already and “recruiting” and “radicalizing” your friends and neighbors through “chatter on the Internet?”

We are all rightwing extremists now. Welcome to the club.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~
Posted in: Homeland Security

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #1
    On April 15th, 2009 at 10:53 am, BlameAmericaLast said:

    How long until they come after conservative bloggers and their commenters and put them on the terrorist “watch” list?

  2. #2
    On April 15th, 2009 at 10:54 am, RedDog said:

    I will be in Chattanooga at Ross’s Landing today with my father-in-law’s 5′x8′ American flag.

    One thing I have noticed about the Left with regard to characterizing their role in American history: They view the defeat of Nazi Germany as a glorious testimony to the triumph of world secular-progressivism over fascism. It is their victory and theirs alone. No conservative or traditionalist contributions are recognized in the least. That is why they are predisposed towards characterizing conservatives as “rightwing” or “extreme”.

    Forget debate or the democratic process altogether – something they typically avoid anyway. They do not consider non-“progressive” Americans as part of their social family or worthy of even minimal consideration. So when you see them freak out at Americans carrying American flags or protesting onerous and heavy-handed government actions, keep in mind that they do not believe we have the right to do so – that is their personal province, not ours.

    Recall all the Bush = Hitler nonsense over the past years (funny since most of the current crop of harpies have little knowledge of history in general and fascists in particular, but seem to know that Hitler was a bad dude). Therefore anyone challenging their neo-socialist leaders must, by definition, be a fascist enemy and not a sincere American with a legitimate beef.

    They seem incapable of seeing that they have become the very thing they profess to hate and the thing they lay on others. They will not ever believe that anyone else can hold moral high ground and that they could, in a very real sense, be wrong.

  3. #3
    On April 15th, 2009 at 10:58 am, RedDog said:

    …Yes I did type up my yarn earlier to post on another thread. This seemed a nice segway.

  4. #4
    On April 15th, 2009 at 10:58 am, Marshall Russ said:

    How long until they come after conservative bloggers and their commenters and put them on the terrorist “watch” list?

    They already have.

  5. #5
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:00 am, pickax411 said:

    We have written a Constitution where we have granted it limited rights. There is no King and the government has only what we have granted it and no more. There men in Government that want more power for themselves that cloak themselves in the in the robes of rulers. I say that ‘We are the Government!’ and tyrants shall be driven out.

  6. #6
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:02 am, DBNinKY said:

    But past domestic terrorism reports have always been very specific in identifying security threats – such as the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth Liberation Front – and very specific in identifying their methods and targets, including repeated physical harassment, arson, and vandalism against pharmaceutical companies, farms, labs, and university researchers.

    It’s the vagueness that’s so troublesome about the DHS report.

    The generalized, non-descript terminology used to id the M.O. of potential threats could lead some overzealous local law enforcement officers to harass conservatives w/o the officers even being aware of it.

  7. #7
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:04 am, MTConservative said:

    You might be a right wing extremist if you get behind Pat Toomey in his bid to unseat RINO Arlen Specter. I am there, man. As soon as Toomey has a website up, I am making a donation to him.

  8. #8
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:07 am, 55dodger said:

    We are all rightwing extremists now. Welcome to the club.

    As a proud American and the father of a deployed serviceman, I am glad to be part of the ‘club’.

    Was hoping to get up to Sacto today but not able to. My father will be there though.

    God Bless you all.

  9. #9
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:08 am, xler8bmw said:

    How much are the monthly dues for our club? LOL

  10. #10
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:13 am, jjmurphy said:

    This is so cool. Now, if I ever am blessed with grandchildren I can tell them about the days when I was a radical extremist!

  11. #11
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:15 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:08 am, xler8bmw said:
    How much are the monthly dues for our club? LOL

    Not nearly as much as it would cost to not be in the club. If you get my drift. ;-)

  12. #12
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:15 am, GraniteMan said:

    I’m proud to make Obama’s “Enemies” list. 76, arthiritic knee, retired and a little slow but dammit I can and will get out to a TEA PARTY and I can vote.

  13. #13
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:15 am, stillontheroad said:

    I guess I am all of the above and then some. I am proud to be called an extremist because my conservative beliefs, I am a free thinking man and nobody is going to take that away from me by either force, coercion or any Liberal tactic.

  14. #14
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:15 am, xler8bmw said:

    #11 so true!

  15. #15
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, ajmontana said:

    Guilty, and don’t give a flip about what DHS thinks, what are they going to do send me to GITMO for being a Conservative. ahahahahhahahahahhahhahaha
    ahahahahahhaahahahahhaha,
    ahahahhahahahahhahahahhahahaha,
    ahahahahhahahahhaahhaha. 8)

  16. #16
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, happyscrapper said:

    I am proud to be a Conservative Extremist and gladly join the club!! We need to give our club a clever name. Any ideas?

  17. #17
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:21 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, happyscrapper said:
    I am proud to be a Conservative Extremist and gladly join the club!! We need to give our club a clever name. Any ideas?

    The “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” club. Shout out to Whoopie. ;-)

  18. #18
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:21 am, cpodug said:

    Unfortunately, I have to work to pay my taxes to support Obummer’s giveaways. My heart is with the tea parties everywhere.

    I am considering organizing one here in Fremont, CA on July 4th in front of Pete Stark-Raving-Mad’s local office, just so I can protest on a day which I feel is more in the spirit of the protests – the day in which we became the United States.

    I welcome all my fellow “Disgruntled Veterans” and “radicalized rightwing extremis” to join me. I will soon have an e-mail address for any correspondence regarding July 4th. With our hostess’ kind permission, I will post it here.

    The time to sit on the fence is long past.

  19. #19
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:22 am, happyscrapper said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:04 am, MTConservative said:
    You might be a right wing extremist if you get behind Pat Toomey in his bid to unseat RINO Arlen Specter. I am there, man. As soon as Toomey has a website up, I am making a donation to him.

    If there are any “dues” to belong to this club, I say give the money to any good candidate who opposes the worst of the crapweasels up for re-election in 2010! Pat Toomey would qualify. And whoever is running against John “Redneck” Murtha.

  20. #20
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:23 am, spaceycakes said:

    aj–if you go, you won’t be able to take your Bible, but if you have a Quran, they’ll wrap it in a waterproof cover for you and read it by your bedside at night.

  21. #21
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:24 am, plymouthacclaim said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 10:54 am, RedDog said:

    One thing I have noticed about the Left with regard to characterizing their role in American history: They view the defeat of Nazi Germany as a glorious testimony to the triumph of world secular-progressivism over fascism. It is their victory and theirs alone. No conservative or traditionalist contributions are recognized in the least. That is why they are predisposed towards characterizing conservatives as “rightwing” or “extreme”.

    Of course, the Left denies that Hitler was a socialist.

  22. #22
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:25 am, Jeff2161 said:

    How much are the monthly dues for our club? LOL

    The deadline for mailing it in, is midnight tonight.
    :shock:

  23. #23
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:25 am, flmom said:

    Anyone else see the irony of this administration’s stance on tiptoeing around the phrase ‘Islamic Extremist’, but it’s okay to call the Right Wing ‘extremists’.

  24. #24
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:25 am, traveler49 said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, happyscrapper said:
    I am proud to be a Conservative Extremist and gladly join the club!! We need to give our club a clever name. Any ideas?

    How about CLUB MALKINTENTS

  25. #25
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:26 am, tarpon said:

    I question the timing …

    Toomey is the one for me as well. Give direct to candidates, forget parties and party committees.

    Be wary of Blue Dogs, just another term for lying Democrats.

  26. #26
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:

    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

  27. #27
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:29 am, spaceycakes said:

    How dare you.

  28. #28
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:29 am, Jeff2161 said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:
    I agree with a left wing blogger.

    :shock: :)

  29. #29
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:30 am, Elm Creek Smith said:

    I was a radicalized right-wing extremist before being a radicalized right-wing extremist was cool. Now I have to join the American Legion to complete my “full house” of “indicators*.”

    Hope is not a plan; not all change is good. WE are the civilian national security force. The resistance is here; the resistance is now. RESIST!!!!

    ECS

    *(White, male, NRA member, retired Army. The American Legion fills it.)

  30. #30
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:30 am, John Deaux said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, ajmontana said:
    Guilty, and don’t give a flip about what DHS thinks, what are they going to do send me to GITMO for being a Conservative.

    We’ll save you a seat.

  31. #31
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:31 am, 30 pcs of silver said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:
    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

    I take it then that you will be relinquishing your ability to comment on her blog, right? Don’t want to be associated with someone like that right, lgm? lgm? Hello?

  32. #32
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:32 am, flmom said:

    lgm said:

    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this.

    Well, color me surprised.

  33. #33
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:33 am, Fuller said:

    Thanks Michell and all patriots here for the info and thoughts on this DHS manifesto bias BS. It’s over the top and offensive. As a vet and very pro military, I take it personal.

    Off to the local tea party now, will be in Tucson for one this afternoon. Extremely windy in these parts today – the stars and stripes will flutter with authority.

  34. #34
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:35 am, Salt said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:

    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this.

    You don’t say… we’re all shocked by this.

    Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh…

    Several here, including at least one liberal, have commented on the fact that the report is poorly written and very indirect as it makes no specific references to any specific groups (or evidence for that matter).

    and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

    You’re mixing your metaphors. Richard Reid (aka Abdul Raheem, an Islamic terrorist) was the shoe bomber, not Timothy McVeigh.

    (I figure if you’re going to be intellectually dishonest about representing MM’s comments, we can all be as obtuse about yours.)

  35. #35
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:37 am, Flyoverman said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, ajmontana said:
    Guilty, and don’t give a flip about what DHS thinks

    You should give a flip and we all should.

    DHS has limited resources; everyone does. This is the equivalent of TSA randomly searching 88 year old women in wheel chairs at the expense of not performing extra screening Middle Eastern men age 18 to 50.

    For you non-vets out there its called Battle Focus or Mission Focus.

    These idiots are going to deplete resources chasing after a group of Americans whose only objectionable trait is they do not fit the politically correct mode of The One.

    It stupid, incompetent and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano should be told in no certain terms, “If you cannot focus on the real HS threats, your replacement will.”

    As mentioned in a prior post, Obama’s reaction or lack of it to this DHS NONSENSE will tell us all much.

  36. #36
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:38 am, ajmontana said:

    Is it a rule we have to have a token libtard like lgm here or something? :roll:

  37. #37
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:39 am, HaileTsada said:

    Whoever was involved in drawing up this alert from DHS should be fired. We should be stoking the fires under our reps to try our best to have these people outed and fired. We should not let this just dry up and blow away.

  38. #38
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:39 am, Straight_Talk_Luigi said:

    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

    1) Considering that you don’t know the name, did you even read the entire blog

    2) Do you realize that by insinuating that Mrs. Malkin is a terrorist you are accusing her of committing crime(s)? Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Folks on the left are so willing to make sure this applies to GITMO detainees who were captured in the middle of the field of battle in a hot war, but when it comes to conservatives, they have a different standard.

    But, I guess it’s okay because it’s for the sake of “progress!” Any and all means are necessary to achieve that!

    3) I have friends and family who are pro-life and against gay marriage and who served in the US military (not happy about serving in Iraq) who voted for Obama. Does this mean they are “right wing extremists?” Or do Obama supporters get a free pass since this little report is pretty much all about silencing those who don’t agree with Obama?

  39. #39
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:40 am, ajmontana said:

    flyover, I don’t give a flip about what DHS thinks of me specifically, I do have concerns in the big picture.

  40. #40
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:42 am, jt3151 said:

    Can I get a job at Northwestern now?

  41. #41
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:43 am, On-my-soap-box said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:
    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

    Just when I think you cannot lower the bar any lower you make yourself out to be an even bigger idiot/target.

    Explain how this report is going to prevent the next McVeigh.

    I suppose if McVeigh was a cop killer, you, the liberals and Hollywood would hold him up as some kind of hero.

    How is that for some good ol’ lgm projection?

    .oO my brain hurts

  42. #42
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:48 am, rplatt said:

    Political oppression, the demise of our Constitutional rights and the elimination of free speech . . . it’s all in the memo.

  43. #43
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:48 am, Flyoverman said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:
    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her?

    I hope they stop the next Tim VcVeigh too. Or do you think we support people who blow up a building after reconing it and knowing there was a day care center in the building? If so, I hope MM throws you off this site.

    What is objectionable in the DHS document is they equate a 73 year old veteran who flies a “Don’t Tread on Me” flag below the U.S. flag in his yard to Tim McVeigh.

    It is the equivalent of calling Joan Biaz, a devote pacifist, a national security threat and sending assets to investigate her. IT’S STUPID!!!! It makes one believe they can’t even secure their car in the parking lot much less the country.

  44. #44
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:49 am, Rogue Cheddar said:

    Paranoia will destroya!

    Rockwell -Somebody’s watching me.

  45. #45
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:49 am, PhredE said:

    And all this time we only jokingly made passing references to the ‘language police’, but, lo and behold, they are here. When do the ‘purges’ begin???

    Flyoverman wrote: “It [sic] stupid, incompetent and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano should be told in no certain terms, “If you cannot focus on the real HS threats, your replacement will.”

    Man, you got that one spot on. I knew she was woefully un/under-qualified for the DHS job and shuddered when I learned of her appointment.

  46. #46
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:50 am, pueblo1032 said:

    I love the WACKOS that pull the MC VEIGH CARD all the time… As if this justifies all the MURDER and MAYHEM caused by RADICAL ISLAM over the last 30 or so years… It don’t work WACKOS… As for the HS report (TOTALLY WRITTEN BY B.HUSSEIN), this may be the PROVERBIAL STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL’S BACK… Especially for the so called MODERATES and other FENCE SITTERS… As for myself, I would rather be called a RIGHT WING RADICAL then a SOCIALIST LIBERAL anytime!!!

  47. #47
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:51 am, Flyoverman said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:40 am, ajmontana said:
    flyover, I don’t give a flip about what DHS thinks of me specifically, I do have concerns in the big picture.

    The good news is we give a flip about what you think? ;) Keep up the fight!

  48. #48
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:57 am, DBNinKY said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:

    LGM, a real liberal would be more concerned w/ Obama’s apparent turn to “cowboy” diplomacy/use of force over dialog in handling the pirate hostage situation – something he said, during the campaign, his administration would never do – rather than fret some free-speech Tea Parties. (As a GOP plant, you should know this.)

    O/T but a question for you:

    How can Captain Phillips’ release be seen as “military” victory for Obama when, as was adroitly pointed out to me on this site, pirates constitute neither a political philosophy nor ideology?

    Instead of the Left spinning it as a military victory, wasn’t it more a less a successful police action?

    But then again, never mind answering. We pretty much know what you’ll say.

  49. #49
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, madmonkphotog said:

    Not only am I a right wing extremist, I’m a racist, nativist, homophobe, part of the conspiracy, and uncaring of my fellow man. Boy,today is a good day!

  50. #50
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, RTater said:

    McVeigh (spit when you say that) was taught bomb-making by Ramsey Yusef (spit when you sy that, too) while in Indonesia. McVeigh was also nutty as a fruitcake. Hardly a paragon of “the right”.

  51. #51
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:01 pm, PhredE said:

    Stepping back, and looking at the progression of events in the last couple weeks (eg. the announcement of a push for amnesty, surfacing of Dream Act bills at the state level, more news/media coverage of the supposed ‘plight’ of illegal aliens and/or their children, etc)…

    It is becoming clear to me, that an offensive (as in opposite of defensive) and concerted ‘push’ is being made to stifle speech and debate on the issue of immigration – especially the white-hot debate on ILLEGAL immigration. Look for all the stops to be pulled to control language, defame persons that don’t use the politically correct terminology, and similar tactics.

    Contact your elected Representatives – early and often.

  52. #52
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, Rogue Cheddar said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:
    I agree with a left wing blogger (Yglesias?) on this. Why would MM read something aimed at stopping the next Timothy McVeigh and think it’s about her? On the other hand, if the shoe fits …

    The blogger to which you refer was Andrew Sullivan. Did you read any of the DHS report? Could you not find overbroad characterizations that might offend? Say people of Christian faith, or members of the American Legion,
    or people who legitimately own firearms to protect hearth and home, or returning members of the military who provide the very freedom for you to write one inane post after another?

    Just asking is all.

  53. #53
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:02 pm, Taz said:

    hmmm ‘Right Wing Extremist’ … looks like I need a new T-Shirt…

  54. #54
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:03 pm, b-cat said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:38 am, ajmontana said:
    Is it a rule we have to have a token libtard like lgm here or something?

    For comic relief.

  55. #55
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:05 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #49 you left out xenophobe!

  56. #56
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, Southpaw said:

    I plan to join the Sierra Club and ACORN. Won’t have to worry about DHS
    watching me and I can be free to express my political opinions, which I will.

  57. #57
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:09 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    I is, I is! I am so proud.

    Central Arizona:

    http://valleyteaparty.com/site/index-5.html

    demonize the Tea Party movement? A day without being insulted by the Left is like a day without homophobic orange juice :)

    Fascism IS here–just listened to John McCain on the Nearly Famous Barry Young Program-KFYI 55 am-that Senator is getting even more weird.

  58. #58
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:14 pm, b-cat said:

    Gretchen Wilson & Merle Haggard, Politically Uncorrect.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZu0nExoN9s

    Guess they’re extremists now.

  59. #59
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:17 pm, xler8bmw said:

    The “One” is on TV again hearing himself talk.

    Ok off subject for a sec he keeps touting this 95% of people tax break again! So if people making over 92K pay 72.8% of all fed income tax how is that possible? Now I am no economist but, again the liberal math doesn’t make sense!

  60. #60
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:18 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:27 am, lgm said:

    I have to turn the radio off when an idiot calls in to a conservative talk show. It’s just too painful to hear. In the same way, it’s painful to read lgm’s posts.

  61. #61
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:21 pm, battleaxe said:

    The pen is mightier than the sword, and he who holds the presidential pen writes the definitions.

    Extremists are now anyone who thinks the government is spending too much.

    WMD (weapons of mass destruction) are now anything that has the capability to injure.

    They’ll soon be confiscating “WMDs” from “extremists”. That’s double-plus bellyfeel goodthink.

    If you drop the newspeak, that means they’ll soon be ignoring the constitution to confiscate Americans’ guns under the guise of terrorism prevention.

  62. #62
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:23 pm, spaceycakes said:

    lgm posting here speaks volumes to Michelle Malkin’s generosity & grace to allow him to express himself.

    Then, typical of a leftist fiend, he insults, nay–nearly libels, her with a comparison to McVeigh.

  63. #63
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:24 pm, norm1111 said:

    Great piece, Michelle…aka..the Boss; one of your best. After I read the DHS report yesterday, I found much to my chagrin, that I am a right wing extremist. Then I spent a few moments thinking about it…..that chagrin, became pride….and today, I carry my “right wing extremism” as a badge of honor…..

  64. #64
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:33 pm, maisy said:

    Maybe this explains why Homeland Security’s number was on my caller Id…?
    No message just a hang up.
    Must say it made me more than a little bit nervous….(intimidating as it is supposed to be.?)…
    Brown shirts on the way???

  65. #65
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:35 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    Ok off subject for a sec he keeps touting this 95% of people tax break again

    A huge portion of the 95% are people who’s income is too low to pay income taxes and they qualify for and get an Income Tax Credit – that’s how liberal math works. Some tax break – take from those who pay and give to those who don’t pay at all.

  66. #66
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:37 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    WMD (weapons of mass destruction) are now anything that has the capability to injure.

    Man, that’s going to put a stop to my hobbies if they take my X-ACTO knives away : )

  67. #67
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, Average Joe said:

    There is a very simple solution to this. Michelle and other sympathetic bloggers all need to host a downloadable “registration” form that people can download and mail into Janet. Just as sex offenders, criminals, etc must register, us “Freedom Offenders” can register too as “defenders of the vision laid out by the founding fathers in the constitution”. John Hancock proudly signed his name to paper in big bold letters to foster the noble concept that became our nation. I am sure many others are willing to sign and send DHS a form registering as a Freedom Offender. If Janet’s office had to deal with a million plus letters over the next month from people registering as Freedom Offenders then the fool authors of this publication might get a clue. P.S. …Besides, the post office needs the business.

  68. #68
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:42 pm, xler8bmw said:

    #64 that I realize but, again how can you give a tax break to someone that doesn’t pay taxes????? A welfare check

  69. #69
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:50 pm, Living in the PSRK said:

    I found this video on Resistnet.net:

    Here is the link for a video, The Third Jihad by an American Muslim about the goals of Jihadist Muslims. It is fully engrossing as well as factual in its explanation of the steps Jihadists have taken and are taking in the USA to implement sharia law.

    The author is careful to point out that these folks have been working on this for decades; no one party is to blame. It is about 30 minutes long, but is an amazing journalisic piece. Dr. Jaffar is an MD. He should be a Senator. Running DHS. Something important. Instead, he is being shunned by the Muslim community. (He has been on GB, so some of you may know of him.)

  70. #70
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:50 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    how can you give a tax break to someone that doesn’t pay taxes????? A welfare check

    One can call it a tax break if it suits one’s purposes and can easily fool a non-thinking audience. Welfare is basically what it amounts to. Liberal compasion at work, buying a voting bloc with our tax payments.

  71. #71
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:55 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    It is fully engrossing as well as factual in its explanation of the steps Jihadists have taken and are taking in the USA to implement sharia law.

    Come, come, stick to the topic in the thread and leave these harmless peace loving people, as so obviously determined by DHS, out of this conversation.

    Or are you just trying to distract this discussion away from your own hateful right-wing extremism?

    /sarc off

  72. #72
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:57 pm, rocketman said:

    ***
    Sign up the Rocketman! Clinging to Bible, guns, Traditional American values, old, white, served in the U.S. Military and promised to defend and protect the U.S.A. against all ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC. Check!
    ***
    Against wasteful spending of our tax dollars. Wants LEGAL IMMIGRATION instead of open borders and ILLEGAL ALIEN AMNESTY. Pro life and ANTI ABORTION–Check!
    ***
    Believes that the U.S.A. is the LAST BEST HOPE FOR FREEDOM. Thinks that our enemies should be engaged with REAL POWER–Ronald Reagan style–bombs, bullets, missiles, economic embargos, etc. Feels that “smart power” and “smart diplomacy” are code words for Neville Chamberlain style appeasing of evil dictators and selling out their victims freedom. Check!
    ***
    Knows that the current GREENIE ENERGY AGENDA and high taxes will destroy our economy and cost every American more money for less energy. Feels that most federal agencies are inefficient and usually too slow and / or dumb to do their jobs properly. Check!
    ***
    Believes that the right way to change our government is to organize and VOTE OUT THE CROOKS in 2010 and 2012–instead of taking part in violence. Check!
    ***
    Janet Neapolitano and President Obama (PBUH) got it right. I am one of those stupid right wing extremists–like George Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan. DHS finally gets one right. I hope they can find the Jihadis from Gitmo that will be in our country soon–living next door on welfare yet! See you at the El Paso Stateline Restaurant Tea Party at 1600 hours. For you liberals–that is when Mickey’s big hand is on the 12 and his little hand is on the 4.
    ***
    John Bibb
    ***

  73. #73
    On April 15th, 2009 at 12:58 pm, happyscrapper said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:25 am,

    traveler49 said:
    On April 15th, 2009 at 11:16 am, happyscrapper said:
    I am proud to be a Conservative Extremist and gladly join the club!! We need to give our club a clever name. Any ideas?
    How about CLUB MALKINTENTS

    Great suggestion! Very creative!

  74. #74
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, DesertLover said:

    Normally I am able to pass off and ignore lgm’s comments … and even to occasionally try to actually try to carry on a reasonable debate on some topic …

    BUT … NOT THIS TIME …

    I lost relatives in the Oklahoma City bombing … I have good friends that lost friends and relatives on 9/11 … and I guarantee you if I could have gotten my hands on McVeigh and Nichols I would have saved the legal systems millions … and they would not have ever found the bodies … and I would consider it a great honor to take out Bin Laden …

    Attempting to compare ALL VETERANS with McVeigh as home grown anti-American extremists is every bit as much of an insult as comparing them to Al Qaeda terrorists … and I am tired of that as well …

    Only because of the military veterans of this great country do any of you retarded ingrates even get the opportunity to voice your so called opinions … here or in public … no matter how ridiculous and asinine they may be …

    If anything you should be kissing the feet of veterans … without them you idiots will not last because in your misguided stupidity you fail to realize that all of your liberalism will make you the first ones to go …

    Tools is all you are … bunch of mindless lemmings …

    /rant off …

  75. #75
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:01 pm, HomeoftheBrave said:

    lgm…. please…. puhleeeeze…. go back to that rock you crawled out from under, the light has to be hurting your beady little eyes. As things continue to heat up and the silent majority really picks up steam, you and the rest of the closet commies will have a lot less room to spew your crap.

  76. #76
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:03 pm, sgcwi said:

    I am PROUD to be a part of “right wing extremism”. It feels good to be labeled something else but a screwed over taxpayer.

  77. #77
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:05 pm, cpodug said:

    DL – I couldn’t agree more – and rant away. lgm is nothing more than a pimple on the @$$ of humanity, and certainly doesn’t warrant a response normally, but in this case, as in the past, he definitely stepped over the line. BZ and Semper Fi

  78. #78
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:06 pm, happyscrapper said:

    Obama came on TV at 11:00 right on cue, just as Rush Limbaugh’s show started. Obama does that all the time. It can’t be an accident! Rush mentioned that he needs the e-mail address of the White House so he can send them a reminder when he is set to start his program so they can be sure and get Obama out to the podium in time! Ha! One sound bite from Obama’s speech this a.m. stood out to me…”We need taxes and our government to create jobs.” Whaaaat??? The government and our taxes create jobs now? I thought capitalism and the entrepreneurial spirit created the jobs. At least they used to.

  79. #79
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:12 pm, DesertLover said:

    cpodug … thanks for having my back my friend …

  80. #80
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I keep thinking, if I were a cop and having read this DHS “warning”, wouldn’t I laugh it off for what it is? What exactly are they supposed to do to us? These Tea Parties are like family picnics, mostly good-natured regular folks, many with children.

    I will be attending wearing a business suit. How threatening is that? What is there to fear? A paper cut? (I know, paper cuts are the worst.)

  81. #81
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    How about CLUB MALKINTENTS

    I like it.

  82. #82
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:17 pm, Salt said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I keep thinking, if I were a cop and having read this DHS “warning”, wouldn’t I laugh it off for what it is?

    Many of the cops I know resemble that which the DHS is warning: Christian, “right wing”, 2nd Amendment supporters… etc

  83. #83
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:19 pm, Flyoverman said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:14 pm, Pasadena Phil said:

    I will be attending wearing a business suit. How threatening is that?

    OHHHHHH a suit…….. You’re one of those greedy bankers who hijacked our money, blew all on risky loans, and then got a million dollar bonus.

    Fes’ up you Nazi.

    Sorry, nothing personal. I’m just working on refining my paranoia.

  84. #84
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    happyscrapper said:
    I am proud to be a Conservative Extremist and gladly join the club!! We need to give our club a clever name. Any ideas?

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots….. man this is fun, so many names fit your profile.

  85. #85
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Ed Mahmoud abu al-Kahoul said:

    Well, I’m 45, not in great shape, and my military service was as a technician, not a warrior. I probably won’t be running around the woods with an AR-15. Especially with young children. If it gets that bad, maybe head for Canada. I’m closer to Mexico, but that wouldn’t be more than a transit point on the way to another nation.

    But if Texas secedes, I would take up arms to defend my state against a corrupt and over-reaching federal government.

  86. #86
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:25 pm, Salt said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, Ilovemycountry spewed:

    Ignore this clown.

    He should have been gone a long time ago after this comment. He is only here to agitate.

  87. #87
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, hawkeye54 said:

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots

    They already have their clubs: Democrat Party, ACORN, CBC, ad nauseum.

  88. #88
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:26 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots….. man this is fun, so many names fit your profile.

    Real mature. I think liberals are programmed to be perpetual 17-year-olds because that’s the level of civility and intellectual discourse they so regularly display.

    All the groups you named would actually be liberal constituent groups. Conservative extremists – gasp! – believe in working, getting a good education, not doing drugs, and not relying on government largess to support them.

  89. #89
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:28 pm, Jet Jaguar said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:22 pm, Ilovemycountry said:

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots…..

    Don’t change the subject of this thread. We’re talking about Conservatives, not libtards (like you).

  90. #90
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:32 pm, DesertLover said:

    FYI …

    Very large crowds already being shown in Boston, DC, Sacramento and Tulsa on Foxnews …

    What makes that impressive is that the tea parties are not even supposed to be starting for a couple of more hours in some of those locations …

  91. #91
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, sbw999 said:

    This is more proof that traditional Americans are fighting for the very life of this Country against Orwellian propagandists, corrupt media, and socialists citizens and highly placed politicans. This is a match of survival between people that want our country to commit suicide, and people who want our Country to be as the Founding Fathers envisioned it.

  92. #92
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    but if you have a Quran, they’ll wrap it in a waterproof cover for you and read it by your bedside at night.

    “…and then the Big Bad Wolf grabbed Little Red and shouted, ‘You little Infidel, you have dishonored our family by going to school!’ And so he beat her and beat her and beat her while Grandma sharpened her knife.”

    “Meanwhile, back at the White Castle (home of tiny little Wagyu burgers), the King’s personal Stooge Sir Janet announced, ‘As of today, all Woodsmen are to be considered radical extremists! We will confiscate their axes and prosecute them to the fullest extent of International Law. In addition – we have changed the phrase ‘Big Bad Wolf’ to ‘Furry Natural Disaster’. That is all. Go to sleep.”

  93. #93
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:40 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots….. man this is fun, so many names fit your profile.

    Really? Happyscrapper is a Grandmother. Would you say that to her face? To your grandmother’s face?

    None of those terms fits anyone on this board.

  94. #94
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:44 pm, sbw999 said:

    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:36 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Well played!

  95. #95
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:53 pm, tampadave said:

    My faith in America is slipping drastically under the tyranny of the Obama administration and Pelosi’s Congress. The DHS report is a deliberate attempt to target Obama’s political foes right before the April 15 Tea Party demonstrations. First Amendment suppression at its finest….

  96. #96
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, xler8bmw said:

    High School Dropouts, Welfare Recipients, Drug Addicts, Losers, Bigots, Idiots….. man this is fun, so many names fit your profile.

    Your screen name sounds like an oxymoron for you to have posted such a racist, bigoted, moronic posting!

  97. #97
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:55 pm, lgm said:

    Straight_Talk_Luigi said (#38):

    2) Do you realize that by insinuating that Mrs. Malkin is a terrorist you are accusing her of committing crime(s)?

    That’s the opposite of what I’m doing. Unless you think about how the King reacted to the play in Hamlet.

    DesertLover said (#73):

    Attempting to compare ALL VETERANS with McVeigh…

    Nobody did that. Relax.

    Finally, it takes a long time to write reports like this. Most of the work was done by Bushies.

  98. #98
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:58 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    Finally, it takes a long time to write reports like this. Most of the work was done by Bushies.

    If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you. Cheap.

  99. #99
    On April 15th, 2009 at 1:59 pm, b-cat said:

    Finally, it takes a long time to write reports like this. Most of the work was done by Bushies.

    It takes about 10 minutes to write such a thing.

  100. #100
    On April 15th, 2009 at 2:00 pm, englishqueen01 said:

    It takes about 10 minutes to write such a thing.

    Especially when you consider that most of the supposed “extremists” merely take opposition to Obama’s policies and there are NO real, documented instances of terror activity or violence cited in the report.

    On the other hand, let’s give lgm the benefit of the doubt. Maybe it was started by Bush – but replace “right” with “left” and liberal causes.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Latest Addition to the Super Bowl Counterterrorism Squad: Hot Dog Vendors

February 3, 2012 07:53 PM by Doug Powers

45 Comments

Hope for the best, plan for the wurst

Obama heads to Disney World to push looser visa policies

January 17, 2012 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

95 Comments

A few more words about Koward Krugman Update: Take two!

September 12, 2011 12:53 AM by Michelle Malkin

74 Comments

Video flashback: A ride to the Top of the World

September 11, 2011 06:51 PM by Michelle Malkin

17 Comments

Ten years on at the 9-11 7-11

September 11, 2011 06:36 AM by see-dubya

44 Comments

The Little Rock Jihadist gets a life sentence

July 26, 2011 11:41 AM by Michelle Malkin

50 Comments


Categories: Homeland Security

Betsys Page

» Cruising the Web
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook