Video: Janet Napolitano’s Extremist Makeover tour

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 16, 2009 11:01 AM

Janet Napolitano made the media rounds this morning to face the public firestorm over DHS’s hit job on conservatives.

I’m calling it the Extremist Makeover tour.

She offered an apology to veterans, saying it wasn’t her intention to offend. It may not have been the intention of the report authors or Napolitano to offend or overreach, but that was certainly the effect. And it remains a mystery why Napolitano felt it necessary to distribute a shoddy nine-page report that was supposedly in the works under the Bush administration for a year, as Napolitano claims, containing zero data backing up the claim of a “resurgence” of rightwing extremist violence — and was padded with analysis from the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center to stir fear of “disgruntled military veterans.”

On Fox and Friends this morning, Napolitano admitted that she would have changed the definition included in the report.

A reminder:

Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.

So, how exactly would she rewrite the definition?

We rightwing extremists want to know.

Posted in: Homeland Security

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Sovereignty, Secession, and Stupidity | NEOAVATARA
  2. Bloodthirsty Liberal » Stand By Your Slander
  3. Let The Excuses Begin « Vets On The Watch
  4. Napolitano, Homeland Security Join Parts of the American Government That Can’t Be Trusted « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  5. Janet No-poligize-o
  6. Not Extremists By Reason Of Insanity « Jane Q. Republican
  7. Warning: If you are a pro-life conservative, you may be considered an enemy of the State Update: Napolitano apologizes to Vets - there is still a lot of apologizing to do. « Jim Blazsik
  8. The Greenroom » Forum Archive » Term Limits
  9. PAXALLES
  10. Hot Air » Blog Archive » Video: The Napolitano walkback begins
  11. CNN’s Jack Cafferty Sounds Off On DHS “Right Wing” Report; Network Adds Nazi Flag Image « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  12. Tea Party Fall Out: Bobby Jindal Takes Himself Out of GOP, Conservative Leadership Role « Peace and Freedom Global Future
  13. DHS Czarina Janet Napolitano’s Attempt at Damage Control, There Are No Coincidences « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  14. Napolitano Apologizes To Veterans For DHS Report - Video Added » Pirate’s Cove
  15. Napolitano Apologizes To Veterans For DHS Report - Video Added : Stop The ACLU
  16. Dear Mommy, I’ve become an RRE… « Get Clued
  17. Nanny Obama Knows Best–How Far Can One Man/Woman Go–Read Rightwing Extremism–Nanny Obama Is Watching You! « Pronk Palisades
  18. Designated Conservative
  19. DHS Report Against Conservatives: Heads May Roll, Bring Popcorn « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  20. Steynian 347 « Free Canuckistan!
  21. Big Hollywood » Blog Archive » Official: Dissent Now Unpatriotic
  22. Hollywood Angst: Country Music’s Toby Keith Claims Celebrities Fear Peer Backlash for Support of Military « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  23. IMAO » Blog Archive » Award!
  24. Michelle Malkin » Clown alert: Janet Napolitano says the “system worked”
  25. Dammit, Janet « Around The Sphere

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #101
    On April 16th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, WarTip said:

    On April 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, Flyoverman said: She did NOTHING to change my opinion that this report is a piece of worthless junk that law enforcement will ignore. It is too broad to have any real use in the field.

    You are missing the entire point though. The idea is not to change the LE perception all at once. The idea is to instigate a subtle nuance using semantics in much the same way as has been done by calling our nation a “democracy” instead of a constitutional republic, calling illegal aliens “immigrants” and thus, to allow for a creeping change to begin that will only become effective over the course of time.

    Interestingly enough, for people with an in-depth view of history (or those like me who simply have no real social life LOL) Ben Franklin also used this method very effectively to influence people’s thinking and decisions. Marx, Stalin, Pol Pot, Hitler, liberals and others, simply use(d) this method for more nefarious purposes.

    As for the length (or lack thereof) of this report, it is actually an analysis of the report in order to give a summary of the completed report itself. Many departmental heads of large organizations need to have everything summarized in order to have a better view of what is going on overall. It certainly does pose some interesting questions about what is in the complete (and fully classified) report.

    Just the two cents of a Gun-toting, Bible-thumping veteran right wing extremist.

  2. #102
    On April 16th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, DBNinKY said:

    Corrected:

    I still find it too big a stretch to consider that the Bush ad is responsible for the [this] DHS report – as written – and[it] is just not something I feel they would put forth.

    Sorry for the sloppy syntax, folks; but that’s how it is when I try to do five things at once – one of them always goes awry.

  3. #103
    On April 16th, 2009 at 5:47 pm, gunslingerpatriot said:

    As a veteran, I do not accept your apology Madame Janet Nepolitino and after reading the entire report demand that you either be fired or resign.

    Midterms coming up in 2010!

    GSP
    “This is Sparta!”

  4. #104
    On April 16th, 2009 at 6:48 pm, Leatherneck said:

    I suspect anyone who is a Nationalist, and does not like the UN puke blue color is their enemy.

    Dr. Savage said we have the enemy within. Perhaps, the enemy is feeling brave with a Marxist in office.

  5. #105
    On April 16th, 2009 at 6:51 pm, limmo said:

    “It’s the violence we’re trying to PROTECT.” Huh?

    Maybe she was talking about protecting the violence against Tom Tancredo at UNC. Does she means she wants to make sure that kind of thing goes undisturbed, unpunished and is protected? I’m confused.

  6. #106
    On April 16th, 2009 at 6:55 pm, MtsEdge said:

    the enemy is feeling brave with a Marxist in office.

    FIFY ;)

  7. #107
    On April 16th, 2009 at 9:22 pm, MuscleDaddy said:

    Leather neck – are you aware of how squarely you’ve hit that nail?

    While DHS is out looking for their blond-haired, blue-eyed terrorist, the enemy is already IN the gate.

    – MuscleDaddy

  8. #108
    On April 16th, 2009 at 10:34 pm, Jimmie said:

    I downloaded this thing….it is not unreasonable to see this as setting up the legal framework for the killing of those who would protest this administration. We were a very peacefull group of citizens concerned about our God given rights and we are being set up as a “Perceived Threat So it seems the question is Should DHS protect an administration or protect the United States of America

  9. #109
    On April 16th, 2009 at 10:42 pm, garydt said:

    Jim M,, well it should be a big deal when the attorney general castigates half the population, from pro life, anti illegal immmigration, anti military, and I bet everything I have she hates the military. She seems to be a bitter old fool and unfortunately she now has some power and I fear she could arrest people who disagree with her viewpoints as well as her boss. She and the BO could declare a national emergency and then arrest anyone who apposes her.

  10. #110
    On April 16th, 2009 at 10:54 pm, Leatherneck said:

    Thank you MtsEddge, and MuscleDaddy.

    You folks have a great evening. I’m going to go cling to my religion, wife, and weapon.

    Over.

  11. #111
    On April 16th, 2009 at 11:41 pm, frontierguy said:

    What’s the Secretary of Homeland Security doing in Mexico City? Keeping the homeland secure?

    Kissing butts of the people that all the new voters in the United States will really keep their allegiance to. Mexico City will let all the new Mexican Americans know to vote DEMOCRAT!!!! Besides, Mexico City butt probably seems tasty to Napolitano.

  12. #112
    On April 17th, 2009 at 12:29 am, Flyoverman said:

    On April 16th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, WarTip said:

    On April 16th, 2009 at 2:41 pm, Flyoverman said: She did NOTHING to change my opinion that this report is a piece of worthless junk that law enforcement will ignore. It is too broad to have any real use in the field.

    You are missing the entire point though.

    No I am not. War game what it will take in the way of effort to track and report on anyone that fits the description. Their whole system will break down from information overleoad.

    Consider this. They are REALLY rolling the dice here. You have seen this report and what it implies. What will be the reaction of the American people if they are predisposed with us and Al Queada hits us again?

    Napolitano will eaither resign or be crucified in the public arena. As I remarked in another post. It will be Carter’s Desert One times 100.

    Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Clinton, control of Congress, liberal agenda, POOOOOOF. This report really set them up. They were stuipid.

  13. #113
    On April 17th, 2009 at 8:17 am, SpeakEasy said:

    On April 16th, 2009 at 11:23 am, jim m said:
    Michelle, how much $$ are you personally making off of this supposed hit job in the form of extra site revenue and such from this site and Hot Air? And how much extra money is Ed Morrisey making off of this?
    I’d like to understand the financial motivations for blowing this out of proportion.

    Jim m, It’s okay to ask but the answer is probably “none of your business.”

    If you don’t like that answer I suggest you start your own blog. The rest of us are happy with the job Michelle is doing.

  14. #114
    On April 17th, 2009 at 8:49 am, rplatt said:

    By her own definitions, Reichsführer Napolitano has declared that about half of the citizens of this country are enemies of the state. Thank you enlightened voters, you really stuck it to us this time.

  15. #115
    On April 17th, 2009 at 8:54 am, rplatt said:

    On April 16th, 2009 at 11:23 am, jim m said:
    Michelle, how much $$ are you personally making off of this supposed hit job in the form of extra site revenue and such from this site and Hot Air? And how much extra money is Ed Morrisey making off of this?
    I’d like to understand the financial motivations for blowing this out of proportion.

    Go ponder it for a decade or two Jim then when you come down from the mountain you can enlighten the world with your findings.

  16. #116
    On April 17th, 2009 at 9:00 am, thetoysurgeon said:

    So what about the HATE leveled at conservative Americans from the left. We are amercians Doesn’t that count. even though you won the election you have no right to charge one side with hate and the other gets away with murder. Did political correctness fall off the bus when the left won the election? Did the left use political correctness to get what they wanted then throw it away?

  17. #117
    On April 17th, 2009 at 9:40 am, md1964 said:

    She Said she didn’t mean to Lump ALL Veterans in the Assessment..

    Which Begs the question.. if not ALL…which ones were she targeting??

    As a Vet.. how do I know if I am excluded or not..

  18. #119
    On April 17th, 2009 at 10:47 am, Flyoverman said:

    On April 17th, 2009 at 9:40 am, md1964 said:

    You are not excluded. This bunch has hated us for 40 years. I saw this during Vietnam when I was in HS and later as a soldier.

    They will only stop hating us when they eventually die of whatever kills them. If you think they care about you, go to The Wall. They did not care about winning and they did not care about us dying while they were playing they charade. There are 58,000 reasons on that Wall why you should never trust them and never doubt for a moment what they think about you.

    All during the Iraq debate up until this moment, did you ever here ONE even ONE of them talk about the importance of winning. “Ending the war” is not winning. They do not care about the sacrifices made to date. They only want votes and power.

    Those are the people in charge again. Never forget it and never trust them.

  19. #120
    On April 17th, 2009 at 11:23 am, SeniorD said:

    It must really irritate Janet Napolitano to dress like a girl.

  20. #121
    On April 17th, 2009 at 11:49 am, Bogtrotter said:

    She was not trusted here in AZ as Gov., that’s for sure.

    On to the military. Liberals like her, and Obama, and pretty much the majority of liberals despise the military. Right now they have to pretend they do not, that the “support the troops”. That will change and before you know it they will be gutting the military budget. In thier minds vets as terrorists makes perfect sense. They really do think something has to be seriously wrong with anyone who would choose to go in the service. And once they get back from Iraq or Afganistan they cannot be trusted, they all have PTSD. I would not put it past them in the future to try and get having been in the military used to bar you from owning a gun.

  21. #122
    On April 17th, 2009 at 12:33 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On April 17th, 2009 at 11:23 am, SeniorD said:

    It must really irritate Janet Napolitano to dress like a girl.

    Oh my bad. Not that it matters, cuz Im cool with the alternative lifestyles, but I thought that was a tranny…

    Bad squirrel! Bad! Sorry, wrong website, wrong thread

  22. #123
    On April 17th, 2009 at 1:50 pm, blues said:

    She said she would have changed the definition.What that tells me is she didn’t bother to read it before releasing it.Does this sound familiar?

  23. #125
    On April 17th, 2009 at 2:47 pm, Bogtrotter said:

    “It must really irritate Janet Napolitano to dress like a girl.”

    On the weekends she can unwind wearing jeans, a flannel shirt, Doc Martin boots. Accessorizing, with a tasteful wallet with heavy chain attached to belt loop

  24. #126
    On April 17th, 2009 at 4:39 pm, emjem24 said:

    jim m said:
    Michelle, how much $$ are you personally making off of this supposed hit job in the form of extra site revenue and such from this site and Hot Air? And how much extra money is Ed Morrisey making off of this?

    I’d like to understand the financial motivations for blowing this out of proportion.

    Jim, would you also like to make some money off of this? What kind of question is this? In college, one of my professors used to say that there is no such thing as a stupid question but there are always exceptions for “unique individuals” (how is that for civil?) like yourself.

    Would you like to start your own blog yourself? Work for yourself? Or are you just jealous being that making money or being a capitalist is considered a sin these days?

    I don’t think this report was blown out of proportion. You try being a veteran or an active duty military member. Are you? It’s insulting for the DHS to suggest that vets have a propensity for violence because they may have experienced PTSD or served in the military (stateside or overseas). You try being the spouse of one of those military members (like myself) and get back to me.

    You have either got to be the most uninformed person on the planet or just plain obtuse. Napolitano, like many libs, is ignorant about the military, and unconsciously carries a bias toward them. This shoddily done report, which I suspect was leaked, wasn’t meant to be released.

    Whatever the circumstance, aren’t you even the least bit curious about why this report was released and the purpose behind it? Is this the appropriate use of our tax dollars? Do you possess any curiousity? Or, are you like many Americans who have decided to stop asking questions of your government in return for your own comfort?

    Personally, I’d like to know YOUR motivations for being on a blog that appears to not be to your liking.

  25. #129
    On April 19th, 2009 at 11:42 pm, SSG David Medzyk said:

    HOOAH!! I’m a Right Wing Extremist!

    I always thought being a citizen, Soldier, veteran, and Chaplain of my Elks Lodge was enough to qualify :)

  26. #130
    On April 22nd, 2009 at 10:02 am, Hanover Fiste said:

    What I find interesting is this, what would make a government afraid of those who have sworn to give their lives in defense of it and the our constitution?

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Courting Disaster hits #9 on NYTimes best-seller list

February 4, 2010 09:50 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Airline insecurity story of the day

February 3, 2010 01:14 PM by Michelle Malkin

63 Comments | 0 Trackbacks

Video: The confession of KSM

February 3, 2010 11:55 AM by Michelle Malkin

18 Comments | 5 Trackbacks

“From A to Z.”

Tonight on C-SPAN: Exposing the Fort Hood cover-up

February 2, 2010 05:07 PM by Michelle Malkin

25 Comments | 2 Trackbacks

Cirque du Jihad: Coming to a federal court near you?

January 29, 2010 03:08 AM by Michelle Malkin

77 Comments | 16 Trackbacks

Britain’s new anti-terrorism plan: Bribes for Bombers!

January 28, 2010 12:21 PM by Michelle Malkin

42 Comments | 3 Trackbacks

Mo’ money.

The shout-outs Obama forgot

January 28, 2010 09:47 AM by Michelle Malkin

53 Comments | 10 Trackbacks

Soft-on-terrorism corruptocrat TSA nominee resigns

January 20, 2010 10:39 AM by Michelle Malkin

44 Comments | 4 Trackbacks

Under the bus.


Categories: Homeland Security



Mudville Gazette

» New Standards in Journalism
Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook