<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday fun: Conservative rebels in blue jeans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/</link>
	<description>news and commentary from a conservative perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:26:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScaryBiscuits</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-682766</link>
		<dc:creator>ScaryBiscuits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-682766</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little late to this party, buried as I was in reporting requirements. Still thought I&#039;d chime in.

Most of my department works with a variety of people, from elected officials to cops, firefighters, and EMS teams. It&#039;s not uncommon to see a county judge from a local jurisdiction to show up to a meeting wearing pressed Levis with a button down and a cowboy hat; the same goes for the county sheriffs and most of the local cops. In my position, I usually meet with the techs -- those geeky guys wearing untucked polo shirts with the jurisdiction logo and jeans. In the end, it&#039;s only the guys from &quot;the big city&quot; that wear the top dollar suits around here. 

So you&#039;d think that, to maintain a little &quot;street cred&quot; with the guys we work with on a daily basis, we&#039;d at least be able to dress according to our audience. Unfortunately, that&#039;s not the case. Our fearless leader -- let&#039;s call her Daisy -- has a pathological hatred of denim. We are the only department outside the exec director&#039;s office that doesn&#039;t get to wear jeans on casual Friday.

It also means that, when I go on a site visit, I&#039;m expected to dress professionally. Last week, I went to a meeting at a local county radio shop. This location was basically a garage where they maintain equipment and install mobile comm units in county vehicles, that happens to have offices attached for the radio system staff. Needless to say, even the county emergency management rep was wearing a polo shirt and khakis; the county sheriff&#039;s rep was in BDUs. Me? I saunter in wearing a suit and heels. I felt like an idiot. And, because of our department policy, I *looked* like one, too. 

We already have a serious handicap in dealing with our first responders due to Daisy&#039;s previous actions. Simply put -- like George Will -- she&#039;s out of touch with her constituency. Her dress code policy is case in point, and only makes the situation that much harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to this party, buried as I was in reporting requirements. Still thought I&#8217;d chime in.</p>
<p>Most of my department works with a variety of people, from elected officials to cops, firefighters, and EMS teams. It&#8217;s not uncommon to see a county judge from a local jurisdiction to show up to a meeting wearing pressed Levis with a button down and a cowboy hat; the same goes for the county sheriffs and most of the local cops. In my position, I usually meet with the techs &#8212; those geeky guys wearing untucked polo shirts with the jurisdiction logo and jeans. In the end, it&#8217;s only the guys from &#8220;the big city&#8221; that wear the top dollar suits around here. </p>
<p>So you&#8217;d think that, to maintain a little &#8220;street cred&#8221; with the guys we work with on a daily basis, we&#8217;d at least be able to dress according to our audience. Unfortunately, that&#8217;s not the case. Our fearless leader &#8212; let&#8217;s call her Daisy &#8212; has a pathological hatred of denim. We are the only department outside the exec director&#8217;s office that doesn&#8217;t get to wear jeans on casual Friday.</p>
<p>It also means that, when I go on a site visit, I&#8217;m expected to dress professionally. Last week, I went to a meeting at a local county radio shop. This location was basically a garage where they maintain equipment and install mobile comm units in county vehicles, that happens to have offices attached for the radio system staff. Needless to say, even the county emergency management rep was wearing a polo shirt and khakis; the county sheriff&#8217;s rep was in BDUs. Me? I saunter in wearing a suit and heels. I felt like an idiot. And, because of our department policy, I *looked* like one, too. </p>
<p>We already have a serious handicap in dealing with our first responders due to Daisy&#8217;s previous actions. Simply put &#8212; like George Will &#8212; she&#8217;s out of touch with her constituency. Her dress code policy is case in point, and only makes the situation that much harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey, George Will! What about THIS movie star in denim? — Cynthia Yockey</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681851</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey, George Will! What about THIS movie star in denim? — Cynthia Yockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681851</guid>
		<description>[...] Malkin: &#8220;Friday Fun &#8212; Conservative Rebels in Blue Jeans.&#8221;    Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Malkin: &#8220;Friday Fun &#8212; Conservative Rebels in Blue Jeans.&#8221;    Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flutejpl</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681431</link>
		<dc:creator>flutejpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681431</guid>
		<description>I wonder how all the women who pay $150, give or take, or in some cases much more, for their name-brand designer jeans would feel about Mr. Will&#039;s comments.  In many cases, they are dressing to impress.  In my personal opinion, many of these designer jeans don&#039;t look all that great.  I&#039;m not a fan of rips, tears, effected fadings, etc.  Some designer jeans, though, even to my eyes, look rather sharp.  Surely most of the wearers of them think they do; I know that, if I spent over $150 on a pair of &quot;dungarees,&quot; I&#039;d have a different image of myself in them in order to justify the expense.

Someone who is buying his/her jeans at KMart or Sears admittedly is probably not thinking all that much about dressing to impress; rather, the thoughts are about practicality, durability, and comfort.  News flash to George Will, these are all important and, as much today as in 1850, necessary things.  I can think of a ton of masons, electricians, plumbers, etc., not to mention moms, dads, cat owners (claws!), etc. who would take exception to his elitism.  For any homeowner, the thought of doing yardwork in Dockers is the matter of jokes.

Furthermore, the important details of practicality, durability, and comfort appear all to be sacrificed by curious George in that photo.  Yellow doesn&#039;t match with much as a bottom for men... strike practicality.  The pants are thin enough that the outlines of his front pockets are visible... strike durability.  He&#039;s clearly got a &quot;muffin top...&quot; strike comfort.  Three strikes, he&#039;s out.

For the record, these comments come from one who just turned 31 and didn&#039;t wear jeans until he was 24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how all the women who pay $150, give or take, or in some cases much more, for their name-brand designer jeans would feel about Mr. Will&#8217;s comments.  In many cases, they are dressing to impress.  In my personal opinion, many of these designer jeans don&#8217;t look all that great.  I&#8217;m not a fan of rips, tears, effected fadings, etc.  Some designer jeans, though, even to my eyes, look rather sharp.  Surely most of the wearers of them think they do; I know that, if I spent over $150 on a pair of &#8220;dungarees,&#8221; I&#8217;d have a different image of myself in them in order to justify the expense.</p>
<p>Someone who is buying his/her jeans at KMart or Sears admittedly is probably not thinking all that much about dressing to impress; rather, the thoughts are about practicality, durability, and comfort.  News flash to George Will, these are all important and, as much today as in 1850, necessary things.  I can think of a ton of masons, electricians, plumbers, etc., not to mention moms, dads, cat owners (claws!), etc. who would take exception to his elitism.  For any homeowner, the thought of doing yardwork in Dockers is the matter of jokes.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the important details of practicality, durability, and comfort appear all to be sacrificed by curious George in that photo.  Yellow doesn&#8217;t match with much as a bottom for men&#8230; strike practicality.  The pants are thin enough that the outlines of his front pockets are visible&#8230; strike durability.  He&#8217;s clearly got a &#8220;muffin top&#8230;&#8221; strike comfort.  Three strikes, he&#8217;s out.</p>
<p>For the record, these comments come from one who just turned 31 and didn&#8217;t wear jeans until he was 24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681383</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681383</guid>
		<description>...and now, back to the George Will mocking.  Feel free to use Latin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and now, back to the George Will mocking.  Feel free to use Latin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681382</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681382</guid>
		<description>That reminds me - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/20.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these guys&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hopkinskimmelcancercenter.org/index.cfm/cID/51&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these guys&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www3.mdanderson.org/devoffice/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these guys&lt;/a&gt; are in the forefront of both research and treatment of cancers of all kinds - and worthy of your consideration...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That reminds me &#8211; <a href="http://www.mskcc.org/mskcc/html/20.cfm" rel="nofollow">these guys</a>, and <a href="http://www.hopkinskimmelcancercenter.org/index.cfm/cID/51" rel="nofollow">these guys</a> and <a href="https://www3.mdanderson.org/devoffice/" rel="nofollow">these guys</a> are in the forefront of both research and treatment of cancers of all kinds &#8211; and worthy of your consideration&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlohaGuy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681378</link>
		<dc:creator>AlohaGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681378</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the smoking hot bartender there has apparently developed cancer and is undergoing chemo.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

All the best to her.  I think we can all agree cancer needs to be throttled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the smoking hot bartender there has apparently developed cancer and is undergoing chemo.
</p></blockquote>
<p>All the best to her.  I think we can all agree cancer needs to be throttled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chapoutier</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681159</link>
		<dc:creator>chapoutier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681159</guid>
		<description>Aloha and Jeff,

Chapoutier is temporarily without internet at home (or my temporary home).  He spent Friday night not ironing his underwear, but rather at a whiskey bar drinking sazerac and wheat beer and lamenting how the smoking hot bartender there has apparently developed cancer and is undergoing chemo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha and Jeff,</p>
<p>Chapoutier is temporarily without internet at home (or my temporary home).  He spent Friday night not ironing his underwear, but rather at a whiskey bar drinking sazerac and wheat beer and lamenting how the smoking hot bartender there has apparently developed cancer and is undergoing chemo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Smackdown: Forever in Blue Jeans &#124; KyleSmithOnline.com</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681148</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Smackdown: Forever in Blue Jeans &#124; KyleSmithOnline.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681148</guid>
		<description>[...] George Will is anti-blue jeans. I have a massive amount of respect for the guy, but I think his age is showing here. Blue jeans are simply the most comfortable, durable option in below-the-waist wear&#8230;and America has become a better place in accepting blue jeans in almost any situation. Michelle Malkin defends blue jeans here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] George Will is anti-blue jeans. I have a massive amount of respect for the guy, but I think his age is showing here. Blue jeans are simply the most comfortable, durable option in below-the-waist wear&#8230;and America has become a better place in accepting blue jeans in almost any situation. Michelle Malkin defends blue jeans here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plymouthacclaim</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681112</link>
		<dc:creator>plymouthacclaim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681112</guid>
		<description>Why is it that so many &quot;conservatives&quot; want to give up the essential aspects of conservatism (such as fiscal responsibility, low taxes, no unnecessary laws, 2nd Amendment...)
but are heck-bent on keeping the irrelvant things, like &quot;slacks&quot;?

I wear jeans, tshirt, and sneakers to CHURCH and no one bats an eye.  In the summer, shorts and sandals.  I dare you to challenge my theology or my conservatism.

&lt;blockquote&gt;The LORD does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How does the presence or absence of a silk rope around my neck affect my understanding of, say, the Tenth Amendment?

Does the presence of a suit and tie mitigate the leftist nature of Obama, Biden, Kennedy, Kerry, Reid... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that so many &#8220;conservatives&#8221; want to give up the essential aspects of conservatism (such as fiscal responsibility, low taxes, no unnecessary laws, 2nd Amendment&#8230;)<br />
but are heck-bent on keeping the irrelvant things, like &#8220;slacks&#8221;?</p>
<p>I wear jeans, tshirt, and sneakers to CHURCH and no one bats an eye.  In the summer, shorts and sandals.  I dare you to challenge my theology or my conservatism.</p>
<blockquote><p>The LORD does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart.</p></blockquote>
<p>How does the presence or absence of a silk rope around my neck affect my understanding of, say, the Tenth Amendment?</p>
<p>Does the presence of a suit and tie mitigate the leftist nature of Obama, Biden, Kennedy, Kerry, Reid&#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MuscleDaddy</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-681000</link>
		<dc:creator>MuscleDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-681000</guid>
		<description>Not fer nuthin&#039; here...

But I think we have &lt;a href=&quot;http://a.abcnews.com/images/US/apr_queen_reagan_070503_ssh.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the definitive answer to the relative propriety of denim.&lt;/a&gt;

Mr. Will may argue if he wishes.

 - MuscleDaddy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not fer nuthin&#8217; here&#8230;</p>
<p>But I think we have <a href="http://a.abcnews.com/images/US/apr_queen_reagan_070503_ssh.jpg" rel="nofollow">the definitive answer to the relative propriety of denim.</a></p>
<p>Mr. Will may argue if he wishes.</p>
<p> &#8211; MuscleDaddy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ks55</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-680870</link>
		<dc:creator>ks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 22:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-680870</guid>
		<description>Not that I spent alot of time looking but his panties are in a bunch.  Sad because I usually enjoy his writing.  I don&#039;t think he gets it - he&#039;s too well off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I spent alot of time looking but his panties are in a bunch.  Sad because I usually enjoy his writing.  I don&#8217;t think he gets it &#8211; he&#8217;s too well off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RabbidSquirrel</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-680807</link>
		<dc:creator>RabbidSquirrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-680807</guid>
		<description>I realized that my familys Christmas get-togethers as I knew it, were over forever once my uncle (who was 15 when I was born) started wearing slacks at family events. I have refused to ever wear dress clothes around family unless it is for a wedding or a funeral.

Fortunately the industry that I work in (and my customers run the gamut of the Fortune 100 [#1 on down the line]) sometime even direct me to wear jeans while I am onsite, because otherwise I would stand out in their workplace.

On occasion, I will dress up when I fly First Class, because it does attract a higher class of gold-diggers and flight attendants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realized that my familys Christmas get-togethers as I knew it, were over forever once my uncle (who was 15 when I was born) started wearing slacks at family events. I have refused to ever wear dress clothes around family unless it is for a wedding or a funeral.</p>
<p>Fortunately the industry that I work in (and my customers run the gamut of the Fortune 100 [#1 on down the line]) sometime even direct me to wear jeans while I am onsite, because otherwise I would stand out in their workplace.</p>
<p>On occasion, I will dress up when I fly First Class, because it does attract a higher class of gold-diggers and flight attendants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-680742</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-680742</guid>
		<description>Even better: Teabag &lt;strike&gt;locator&lt;/strike&gt; compass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even better: Teabag <strike>locator</strike> compass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasadena Phil</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-680741</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasadena Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-680741</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt; On April 18th, 2009 at 8:17 am, karl9000 said:

Since we’re discussing fashion here, aside from catching anything that will permanently stain, what purpose does a tie serve?

Just curious…&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Teabag locator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> On April 18th, 2009 at 8:17 am, karl9000 said:</p>
<p>Since we’re discussing fashion here, aside from catching anything that will permanently stain, what purpose does a tie serve?</p>
<p>Just curious…</p></blockquote>
<p>Teabag locator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truth v. The Machine &#187; Archives &#187; Working Blue</title>
		<link>http://michellemalkin.com/2009/04/17/friday-fun-conservative-rebels-in-blue-jeans/comment-page-2/#comment-680736</link>
		<dc:creator>Truth v. The Machine &#187; Archives &#187; Working Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michellemalkin.com/?p=26606#comment-680736</guid>
		<description>[...] And I&#8217;m guessing George would have more credibility if he didn&#8217;t wear things like this in public. But I digress.   Why do people wear jeans? They are functional. They are comfortable. They are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And I&#8217;m guessing George would have more credibility if he didn&#8217;t wear things like this in public. But I digress.   Why do people wear jeans? They are functional. They are comfortable. They are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

