CNN’s cover-up and “fair use” abuse

By Michelle Malkin  •  April 20, 2009 11:01 AM

Unhinged CNN reporter Susan Roesgen is on “vacation” after scrapping with Tea Party protesters last week, but her bosses are still hard at work trying to stifle Tea Party voices of dissent. As many of you know, CNN forced the takedown of behind-the-scenes video shot by Andrew Marcus of Founding Bloggers and posted to YouTube. Founding Bloggers has sent and published an open letter to the cable network requesting that the video (which has aired on other TV networks without retribution) be restored:

In short, we suspect that you are harassing us because our product was popular, because we are small, and because you can. We conclude, with some amusement, that your conduct tends to lend validity to the least flattering stereotypes associated with your organization. We live in the era of the internet – it is not so easy to silence people these days, as you will discover. In the final analysis, you will have become the butt of your own joke.

Should you prefer to avoid this fate, we will, of course, welcome the return of our production to its rightful spot – and the 3000+ viewer generated comment-opinions, both in support and in opposition, regarding it. Alternatively, should you prefer to continue on your current course of intimidation and censorship, we will endeavor to counter your actions.

In short, withdraw your fraudulent DMCA claim against our production, and instruct You Tube to restore the clip.

CNN is engaging in blatant abuse of the DMCA to stifle free speech under the guise of “fair use.” Been there, done that. Hot Air successfully fought off a bogus takedown from the bullies at Universal Music Group. I hope the Founding Bloggers do the same — and shame the censors at CNN for eternity.

Patterico recommends an “I am Spartacus” approach. Grab a copy of the forbidden video and post it yourself on YouTube. I’ve posted the video CNN doesn’t want you to see on my account, too:

Patterico also has more background on Susan Roesgen and her bogus reporting on the Jena 6.

~ For the latest breaking news, be sure to join Michelle's e-mail list ~

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Comments


  1. #101
    On April 20th, 2009 at 1:56 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 1:43 pm, SpeakEasy said:
    So what the hell are the trolls going on about?

    Warning: probably not work safe

    Video: Its always Sunny in Philadelpia – Troll Toll

  2. #102
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:08 pm, JamieD said:

    he may have been off by a lot, but that would not make him a liar. Just a bad counter. The fact that he had said not 10 minutes before that he thought the number to be much smaller does.

    Chap:
    Your entire premise is flawed as proven by the data you provided on the “off air mike”.

    Cavuto asked some one elses opinion on whether the expected 5000 had showed up. The verbal response was an emphatic “more”. Add to that response the unseen visual body language and that can most reasonably explain the difference in the numbers he chose to present on air.

    You have created a whole argument and accusation of lying by first mis-representing the question asked by Cavuto as a statement.

    Pllleeeassseee, go away until you know the difference and start using honest representative of the events that occurred before forming an opinion and respresenting it as a valid argument.

    By your own data, Cauvuto never said that he thought the number to be much smaller and yet you claim he did and based your whole distracting argument and further attack of FNC on the false premise.

    He asked a question. Thats a big difference from making a statement.

  3. #103
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    All I’m hearing is obfuscation. Typical, but still pathetic.

    Obfuscation?

    I am responding directly and on point to a comment made by one of the presumably “non-trolls” here about the supposed unbiased nature of Fox News reporting.

    No one seems to mind “off topic” until it becomes a subject uncomfortable to the general sensibilities of the board. Then the screams of Obfuscation! and Derailing! ring to high heaven.

    The topic of the post itself, as Mookie alluded to is boring and uncontroversial. Of course they have no right to pull the video. Of course this falls squarely under fair use. Of course CNN is embarrassed and trying to protect its reporter. Of course, they are a big name and hope the threat of suit, even without merit, is enough to cower YouTube.

  4. #104
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:16 pm, chapoutier said:

    You have created a whole argument and accusation of lying by first mis-representing the question asked by Cavuto as a statement.

    Jamie, you cannot be that stupid/pathetic. He asked the Pproducer’s opinion, and then said (mind you before the producer provided any response):

    “CAVUTO: There’s gotta’ be 5,000.”

    How is that not a statement by Cavuto? One which, by the way the producer generally agreed with.

    Stop being such a Cavuto lapdog. One can kinda sorta see where one would go from “5,000 maybe more” to saying 5, 6 maybe 7 thousand. But to jump from what he said to making a claim of “at least 10,000 and possibly 15,000 defies credulity. Much like your pitiful rationalizations.

  5. #105
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, tampadave said:

    I understand that Obama overlooked the event as inconsequential. Why am I not surprised.

    It seems I can’t escape the White House folks. VP Biden showed up at my daughter’s rowing regatta in Virginia to watch his own granddaughter row in the Sidwell Friends novice 8+ boat. Of course, Secret Service SUVs delayed spectators trying to leave the regatta at its conclusion. Joe must have heard there were as an abundance of Republican families at the event (politics aside, I hope his granddaughter enjoyed a great day on the race course). Needless to say, I did not seek out his autograph, photo, or advice.

  6. #106
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:18 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:09 pm, chapoutier said:

    It got you on topic.

    Mission accomplished.

  7. #107
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:19 pm, undresiege said:

    No one seems to mind “off topic” until it becomes a subject uncomfortable to the general sensibilities of the board. Then the screams of Obfuscation! and Derailing! ring to high heaven.
    The topic of the post itself, as Mookie alluded to is boring and uncontroversial. Of course they have no right to pull the video. Of course this falls squarely under fair use. Of course CNN is embarrassed and trying to protect its reporter. Of course, they are a big name and hope the threat of suit, even without merit, is enough to cower YouTube.

    Ditto that. Get over yourself PB.

  8. #108
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    In post 60, I lazily and incorrectly used the word “proof” in my first sentence. It is not “proof” of lying, but merely evidence of such.

    Go to your room.

  9. #109
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:23 pm, chapoutier said:

    Go to your room.

    Is that where I am to receive the 30 lashes or am I just to wait there for further instructions?

  10. #110
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    But this issue is frankly becoming rather stupid. Whatever the number, it was an impressive crowd.
    -Chaputier, July 25, 2008

  11. #111
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Is that where I am to receive the 30 lashes or am I just to wait there for further instructions?

    No lashes. Please just think about how many people are impacted by these tragic mistakes, many of them children…

  12. #112
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:30 pm, JamieD said:

    Jamie, you cannot be that stupid/pathetic. He asked the Pproducer’s opinion

    Thank you for the fair kind words Chap :shock:

    My response is that they were formulating an opinion collectively, and you presented this as “The fact that he had said not 10 minutes before that he thought the number to be much smaller”.

    This constitutes a dishonest representation of the events that transpired.

    Question: Do you every enter a conversation with one point of view, but leave with an opposing point of view?

    In an honest debate this is the normal result when additional facts are revealed.

  13. #113
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:36 pm, PBoilermaker said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:28 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Too funny!

  14. #114
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    But this issue is frankly becoming rather stupid. Whatever the number, it was an impressive crowd.
    -Chaputier, July 25, 2008

    Which is why it is so strange for Cavuto to be disningenuous.

    But point taken. And nice search abilities.

  15. #115
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:40 pm, FruNobulux said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 11:23 am, Salt said:

    It seems like we both agree that the CNN video should not be removed, so I am uncertain why we also need to discuss the FNC video.

    Because you’re debating a liberal, and their main tactic is to avoid the substance of the discussion by going around in meaningless and illogical circles, trying to get you frustrated and annoyed. You’ve handled it nicely.

  16. #116
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Chaputier

    I apologize for the mis-spelling, many people are impacted by these tragic mistakes, many of them children…

  17. #117
    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:58 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:37 pm, chapoutier said:

    Which is why it is so strange for Cavuto to be disningenuous.

    Your entire argument is made null and void because you misspelled the word disingenuous.

    Where’s Mr. Lemmiwinks when you need him, Mr. Slave?

  18. #118
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:02 pm, chapoutier said:

    Where’s Mr. Lemmiwinks when you need him, Mr. Slave?

    I see your anal fetish is still going strong.

    Try to keep it to yourself, or at least keep Aunt Bee (not Bea, btw. Odd you would misspell that considering your obsession over her as well) out of it this time.

  19. #119
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:08 pm, FilmLadd said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:02 pm, chapoutier said:

    Try to keep it to yourself, or at least keep Aunt Bee (not Bea, btw. Odd you would misspell that considering your obsession over her as well) out of it this time.

    Bea Arthur is hot in the world of progressives.

    Just trying to make you feel at home by hanging up a few things from your world.

  20. #120
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, Sgt.Slappy said:

    From an update (in the info) of the vid posted by user fearblocke at You Tube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6xWGvdRQ9Q
    UPDATE: Woman in Video confronting the CNN Reporter has posted a response on why she did it: http://smartgirlpolitics.ning.com/profiles/blog/list?user=248xfs0bsym3j
    “I am the woman scolding the reporter in the video for her ridiculous confrontation with the protesters, and her biased reporting. Something that all of us conservatives must remember is that the left-wing media will do whatever it takes to marginalize us, degrade us, and disenfranchise us. Although I didn’t know that a blogger was videotaping the whole thing, I am glad that he did. I’m also glad that this video has gained so much exposure on Fox and the internet. All of us conservatives must continue to educate ourselves on the media lies and distortions, and we MUST stay informed on what the government is doing to us. When our liberal friends and relatives accuse us once again that we didn’t complain when Bush was overspending and piling up debt, we must answer them. I routinely remind liberals that the Obama administration isn’t just doing what Bush did, he’s quadrupling what Bush did! I didn’t agree with the debt we were piling up during the Bush years, but we were recovering from 9/11 and we were fighting two wars. Obama’s spending is for entitlements, socialization of our country and economy, and he’s falsely using the financial crisis to fundamentally change our country.

    The mainstream media is helping Obama with this mission. Their corruption is astounding. That CNN reporter zeroed in on one guy who was holding up an offensive sign depicting Obama as Hitler, and she chose to interview him first. I personally believe that man was an ACORN plant, and it wouldn’t surprise me if CNN knew that. My beef with her after she got done interviewing him and the gentleman with the baby, was that she was distorting what the majority of us were doing. She had an agenda that had to be confronted. She also showed extreme disrespect for the man with the baby, who was an honest man trying to explain his point of view. And to top it off, she accused me, and others, of being sent to the rally by some organized group and FOX News….as if she couldn’t believe that we were just Americans expressing our freedom of speech and disgust with government overspending. On top of this, Anderson Cooper, Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow spent a week prior to the protests denigrating us by comparing us to a sexual act that they probably invented! So much for Obama’s promise of hope, change, and bringing the country together. There’s more division, hatred, and vitriol now than there ever was during the Bush years. And that division was a hard act to follow. This is what Obama has wrought with the help of the media.

    Lastly, that CNN reporter represented something really vulgar and disgusting about the mainstream media in today’s world. They are supposed to be the voice of the people…the watchdogs….the check on the government’s over-reaching. They are not supposed to be the shill for the government they want. And that is what they have become. Cheap, vulgar shills. “

  21. #121
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:23 pm, Mookie said:

    Mookie, you’ve been gone for a few days.

    Did you just get off work for the weekend or are you back from the wine tasting expedition across Sonoma.

    Big Boston sports weekend. I was too busy screaming at the TV.

    CNN is painfully stupid. There are thousands of clips from various CNN reports on YouTube. Aren’t those in violation as well?

  22. #122
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:30 pm, Sgt.Slappy said:

    Huh. I tried to post a comment, but it didn’t take… O.k. The woman confronting the CNN shill in the video is named Cathy Barkulis, and she has a blog here.
    She has something to say about the vid there.

  23. #123
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:32 pm, RabbidSquirrel said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 2:20 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    In post 60, I lazily and incorrectly

    Did you really just offer age discrimination as valid excuse?

    LOL LOL

    My youthful indiscretion and soon to fail eyesight, misread ‘In’ as ‘Im’

    Ummm if I volunteer for the lashes, do I have to pay extra?

  24. #124
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:40 pm, Southpaw said:

    Just got around to watching the video. Nothing like watching a pseud0-journalism career go down in flames. Ain’t the Internet great?

    As far as Chicago Narcisists Network (CNN) trying to censure other peoples content on-line….Laughable.

  25. #125
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, JamieD said:

    Can anyone, using a straight face, not declare CNN nothing more than a propaganda network?

    Seriously, their actions speak louder than any other argument.

  26. #126
    On April 20th, 2009 at 3:54 pm, Bruce said:

    I’m still waiting for a link from which to actually download the video. None of the YouTube links support downloading.

  27. #127
    On April 20th, 2009 at 4:06 pm, Southpaw said:

    The trolls are cracking me up today. A gay judge at a beauty pageant?
    An oxymoron.

  28. #128
    On April 20th, 2009 at 4:10 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 11:20 am, lgm said:
    I watched Fox last night. They said repeatedly that Obama is a Socialist and a Fascist.

    Bush is Like Hitler except Hitler won the election? Oh well.

    Obama IS a Socialist and a Fascist.

    Read his damn book and listen to his speeches/explanations of the Constitution and Wealth Justice.

    So repeat after me:
    Obama IS a Socialist and a Fascist. But them I imagine lgm is also-besides being a twit.

  29. #129
    On April 20th, 2009 at 4:12 pm, ArizonaNeanderthal said:

    Chicago Narcissists Network (CNN)

    :-)

  30. #130
    On April 20th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, DBNinKY said:

    To the contrary, while Hannity admits to being a conservative “commentator”, both he and Bill O repeat the bogus claim that the network is fair and balanced.

    You’ve never heard O’Reilly say Fox news analysis leans right but not its reportage? (He says “reportage” in a decisively pronounced manner.) He reiterates it every few months, as does Hannity. Anyway, a quick Google search brought up an O’Reilly interview on THR.com that appears to have the quote, paraphrased perhaps, but the essence remains.

    I think all networks give both sides, but the slant comes in the tone and presentation style.

    Ridiculing the Right while extolling the virtues of the Left in a supposed news story is not fair and balanced reporting; check any non-FNC network to verify.

  31. #131
    On April 20th, 2009 at 5:08 pm, spaceycakes said:

    On April 20th, 2009 at 11:20 am, lgm said:

    I watched Fox last night.

    There you go again, admitting you watch FOX.
    C’mon,
    lgm, you do watch it “24/7″, don’tcha?

  32. #132
    On April 20th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, undresiege said:

    You’ve never heard O’Reilly say Fox news analysis leans right but not its reportage? (He says “reportage” in a decisively pronounced manner.) He reiterates it every few months, as does Hannity. Anyway, a quick Google search brought up an O’Reilly interview on THR.com that appears to have the quote, paraphrased perhaps, but the essence remains.

    I’ve tried to find it, and will keep looking, but again have only heard Fox’s talking heads mention “fair and balanced” coverage/reporting and never a mention of the network leaning to the right. It’s a facade.

    Ridiculing the Right while extolling the virtues of the Left in a supposed news story is not fair and balanced reporting; check any non-FNC network to verify.

    I agree. Only FoxNews uses the terms “Fair and Balanced” however.

    All of the news channels have a slant. Heck, nowadays most people use all types of recources and form their own opinions. I don’t think objective news exists anymore.

  33. #133
    On April 20th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, Ragspierre said:

    I guarantee if Chris Matthews or Olbermann or anyone from CNN or ABC or whatever had been caught saying the EXACT same words at an anti-War or pro-Choice rally, we would not see so much benefit of the doubt, calling it a “correction” or an update, nor presuming favorable, if not tortured, definitions of “at least” here.

    Actually, most of us would likely never know…along with the vast majority of television consumers who have better taste.

    The remainder would say, “Yawn. There they go again…”. For, if that were the height and depth and breadth of their expressed bias, we would consider they were off their game.

  34. #134
    On April 20th, 2009 at 6:11 pm, zorro said:

    CNN forced the takedown of behind-the-scenes video shot by Andrew Marcus of Founding Bloggers and posted to YouTube.

    Another death rattle from the leftist media. I will celebrate when they gasp their last breath.

  35. #135
    On April 20th, 2009 at 8:11 pm, mytake said:

    Cathy B. sums it up well for me. And someone just used the word “twit”. I ask that you please refrain from using that word unless referring to my favorite twit, Nancy Pelosi. I often add “Nancy Pelosi is a twit” to my posts, on or off topic. I think that is why I’m getting audited. Just because I’m paranoid doesn’t mean the guvment ain’t out to get me.

  36. #136
    On April 20th, 2009 at 8:16 pm, mytake said:

    The best was, “This is not for family viewing”. Obama should send social services in to take the kids at the tea parties away from these abusive parents and throw the parents into jail or re-education camps.

  37. #137
    On April 20th, 2009 at 8:30 pm, threeCents said:

    Why does is it that the MSM increasingly cares less and less about having any remnant of trust with its viewers? With lows like this, it’s a wonder we haven’t hit magma yet.

  38. #138
    On April 20th, 2009 at 8:31 pm, threeCents said:

    correction: …they haven’t hit magma yet. I highly recommend the Preview button. It’s a useful tool!

  39. #139
    On April 20th, 2009 at 10:56 pm, frontierguy said:

    I don’t understand, the lefties are so out of sorts because of people calling Obama a fascist. My god, look it up, it fits….

    Fascists want a one party system…the takeover of the census will help ensure that.

    Fascists want to take over private enterprise….we are seeing the bailouts were just that. banks are trying to give the money back and the feds won’t let them? The feds are firing CEO’s?

    Fascists promote their agenda through class warfare….Hello, the rich already payed most of the taxes. You were never told that though.

    Fascists terrorize opposing views…DHS states that domestic right wing terrorists are what we should be afraid of…people turning in their neighbors, Nazi Germany style.

    There is more…Obama is a fascist. Look it up.

  40. #140
    On April 21st, 2009 at 3:26 am, conservative in europe said:

    Undresiege said: All of the news channels have a slant. Heck, nowadays most people use all types of recources and form their own opinions. I don’t think objective news exists anymore.

    Absolutely 100% agree with that.

    Fox’ treatment by other media outlets and Democrats is what grinds my gears… To a Dem, what is on CNN or MSNBC is the gospel truth – but anything stated on Fox is dismissed immediately.

    Every news outlet has a slant. However, this incident and CNN’s stamp of approval on it simply confirms what we have all known since the day Clinton won his first primary: CNN isn’t a news outlet. It is a stump for liberal political activism.

    The Left screams that CNN calls itself “Fair and Balanced” while, in the Left’s opinion it is not. I will make a deal with you Lefties – Fox will call itself the “Right Wing News Network” if and only if CNN agrees to cease using their words “News” or “Journalism” in their “reporting” or titles. They have become a political forum. Be honest with yourselves and admit it.

  41. #141
    On April 21st, 2009 at 10:48 am, DBNinKY said:

    I’ve tried to find it, and will keep looking, but again have only heard Fox’s talking heads mention “fair and balanced” coverage/reporting and never a mention of the network leaning to the right. It’s a facade.

    It’s a fact: their reporting is fair and balanced; their news analysis shows like Hannity, O’Reilly, and Beck lean right. Watch their analysis shows long enough and you will hear them say it. They have nothing to hide.

You must be logged in to post a comment.


CPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string

February 9, 2012 10:15 AM by Michelle Malkin

109 Comments

Editor’s Note of the Day

January 18, 2012 02:36 PM by Michelle Malkin

82 Comments

Boston Tea Party: 238th anniversary

December 16, 2011 01:38 PM by Michelle Malkin

67 Comments

MSNBC Leans Forward to Apologize to Mitt Romney

December 15, 2011 04:33 PM by Doug Powers

41 Comments

Sorry we much

Occupy Wall Street Shuts Down Production of Law & Order Episode About Occupy Wall Street

December 9, 2011 03:20 PM by Doug Powers

67 Comments

“Irony can be pretty ironic sometimes…”


Categories: Blogosphere,Media Bias,Tea Party

Follow me on Twitter Follow me on Facebook