Sarah Palin on Twitter? You betcha! — Update: TV critic has PDS

By Doug Powers  •  April 30, 2009 11:15 AM

Sarah Palin is now using Twitter (AKGovSarahPalin), and I see she’s increased about 100 followers just in the time to write this sentence.

Update: Maybe the governor will be doing some Tweeting about her upcoming appearance on American Chopper. I think I’ll go to the Sturgis rally this August… ya know, just in case.

Update II: Via Newsbusters — The Baltimore Sun’s pencil-necked TV critic put his Palin Derangement Syndrome out for all to see in his description of the American Chopper episode featuring Palin:

Move over, Kate Gosselin, a bigger hot dog than you is coming to The Learning Channel Thursday night when Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin appears on American Chopper.

Is this a marriage made in reality TV heaven or what?

Thursday’s episode featues Paul Teutul Sr., the father of the chopper building clan that stars in this series, journeying to Alaska to do research on a special bike that he and his posse are building to honor the 50th anniversary of the state.

And, of course, who better to be his new best biker mama friend than that moose hunting sharpshooter, who blew up any chance the Republicans had to make it to the White House last fall with her divisive rhetoric and disastrous TV interviews.

American Chooper airs at 9 Thursday night on TLC.

Posted in: Sarah Palin

See what others have said

Note from Michelle: This section is for comments from michellemalkin.com's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that I agree with or endorse any particular comment just because I let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with my terms of use may lose his or her posting privilege.

Trackbacks

  1. Friday Night BTR « Vets On The Watch
  2. Why Sarah Palin Drives Female Liberals Crazy « Frugal Café Blog Zone
  3. Sarah Palin is a genuine ethics reformer, so they are trying to destroy her with frivolous ethics complaints. « Goodtimepolitics
  4. GOP: Where Are We Going? | NEOAVATARA
  5. Twitter Apple Info» Michelle Malkin » Sarah Palin on Twitter? You betcha! | Twitter Apple Info
  6. Sarah Palin on Twitter - new fodder for the libturd media | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
  7. Twitter Apple Info» Michelle Malkin » Sarah Palin on Twitter? You betcha! — Update: TV ... | Twitter Apple Info
  8. Let’s get Sarah to 1 Million on Twitter
  9. Blatant Anti-Palin Bias in the Liberal Media: A Collection (168 Cases) « BUUUUURRRRNING HOT
  10. Frugal Café Blog Zone » Price of Hate: Alaskan Liberals Out to “Get Sarah Palin”

Trackback URL

Comments


  1. #691542
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:21 pm, chapoutier said:

    Oh, and Zero, you know that MM is your favorite blog, you just won’t admit it.

    But his OTHER favorite one is

    christianhatingbabyeatingevilathiests.blogspot.com

  2. #691546
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:22 pm, Snowfire said:

    emjem24 #160

    Whew!! If I’d had those problems, I might not be a Ford purchaser either. I appreciate your point of view. I just hope we can keep at least one American company of any kind operating.

  3. #691547
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:23 pm, Jeddite said:

    Everyone:

    I did not intend to threadjack. I was responding to something that Chaps had said. I know that abortion is a particularly sensitive and touchy subject among many here. EQ, Zero, and I can all attest to that.

    Again, I didn’t mean to change the subject. Does anybody like pugs? :oops:

    There’s no real threadjack. Part of the discussion swung to moderates and, for whatever reason, moderates are apparently people who cant hold/maintain a political conviction, not people who maintain political convictions that are outside by the far left and far right spectrums. Abortion is a good, if heated, exmaple of one these convictions.

    Also: rat terriers – is this not the most adorable of beasts?

  4. #691548
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:23 pm, sambo said:

    Jeddite, you bailed out!
    is abortion equate to murder in the Dominican Republic?

  5. #691551
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:24 pm, zeroangel said:

    John:

    LOL. It was about time for a Reductio ad Hitlerum, wasn’t it?

    emjem24:

    I was just a tad surprised. I remember you being one of the more vocal pro-life folks. I have to admit I did not expect to hear that your husband has more or less identical views to me on the matter. Does he also support ESCR? Why or why not?

    (Might as well threadjack, it’s past the point of no return anyhow. I’ll be sure and bring up evolution and maybe even god later).

    PS. Awww cute doggie!

  6. #691554
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:26 pm, zeroangel said:

    chapoutier:

    christianhatingbabyeatingevilathiests.blogspot.com

    LOL. Actaully, it’s richarddawkins.net, so, depending on who you ask, what you say isn’t wholly inaccurate.

  7. #691557
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:27 pm, Jeddite said:

    Jeddite, you bailed out!
    is abortion equate to murder in the Dominican Republic?

    I bailed out of nothing. If you’re trying to entrap me, I’m afraid it just won’t work. Despite whatever your feels on the subject of abortion, abortion is not considered murder by the laws of the United States of America.

    “Muslim countries” are not the USA, and I’m not going to defend what is permissible by law in those countries. But hey, if you want to me say that I think stoning 8 year old girls is A-OK, then I’m afraid you’re going to be rather disappointed.

    Also: I’m not familiar with the laws surrounding abortion in the Dominican Republic. And again, the Dominican Republic is not the USA, nor, to my knowledge, a “muslim countr[y]“

  8. #691571
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:18 pm, emjem24 said:

    Again, I didn’t mean to change the subject. Does anybody like pugs?

    Are they zombie pugs?

  9. #691572
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:32 pm, emjem24 said:

    Snowfire said:
    emjem24 #160

    Whew!! If I’d had those problems, I might not be a Ford purchaser either. I appreciate your point of view. I just hope we can keep at least one American company of any kind operating.

    I hear ya. I’m disappointed in what’s happened with the Big 3. I want to give them a chance but it’s become a trial and error thing with me when it comes to American autos.

    I really like Saturn and resent how GM has mismanaged all its brands. They shouldn’t have had to let go of the Pontiac brand. Since Chrysler has now declared bankruptcy, GM might as well now too because they have so many brands under their umbrella that they can’t seem to manage.

    I hope Saturn leaves the GM fold and functions on its own or I don’t know what I’ll do. I don’t know if Saturn is reluctant to do without GM because it gives them a lot of financial backing, has the GMAC financial arm, or both but Saturn will have to make a choice. I really wanted to trade in my Vue for another, newer Vue but if Saturn goes, there goes that plan.

  10. #691573
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, Jeddite said:

    I am, however, going to “bail out” of my office for 30 minutes to acquire a tasty naked burrito bowl from Chipotle – carnitas style. A crime in some “muslim countries,” I am sure. FIGHT THE SWING FLU! :P

  11. #691574
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:33 pm, cicerokid said:

    Puppies! Like my Char-pei?

  12. #691579
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm, John Deaux said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:23 pm, Jeddite said:

    Also: rat terriers – is this not the most adorable of beasts?

    Ratties have the most unique personalities of any breed I know. And they are fearless.

  13. #691583
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, sambo said:

    I wasn’t trying to trap you Jeddite. I was just trying to find out what basis you were making that statement. Now I see that its ‘whats legal in the US’. To add a third point to your knowlege of the Dominican Republic…abortion is not legal and therefore it could equate to murder.

  14. #691586
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:36 pm, emjem24 said:

    Jeddite said:

    Also: rat terriers – is this not the most adorable of beasts?

    Yeah, they’re cute too. Terriers are a tad hyperactive and need a strict routine of chasing the human around to get a toy. I had a Yorkie growing up and she was cute but she was a hyperactive little princess on steroids.

    I’ll take a pug who is low maintenance and will lie on my lap whenever they want.

  15. #691591
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:38 pm, chapoutier said:

    I suppose a cat person should probably just stay right out of this conversation.

  16. #691598
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:40 pm, sambo said:

    chapoutier said:
    I suppose a cat person should probably just stay right out of this conversation.

    I thought cats like rodents?

  17. #691601
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:42 pm, zeroangel said:

    sambo:

    I was just trying to find out what basis you were making that statement.

    The very obvious basis that myself and likely Jeddite will use has been stated many, many, many, many, many, many times on this board. Do I even have to restate it? For what purpose? So we can have a hate-filled flame-fest once again?

    We have been through this debate a million times on this website, why do you even bother trying to rehash exactly the same arguments (which go nowhere) when you already know the retort?

  18. #691606
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:44 pm, zeroangel said:

    Dogs and cats are great. Especially with ketchup, even my pet dog and cat agree on that point.

  19. #691608
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:46 pm, sambo said:

    zeroangel said:
    The very obvious basis that myself and likely Jeddite will use has been stated many, many, many, many, many, many times on this board.

    I haven’t seen a debate on moderate pro lifers…is it a person who knows that its wrong but doesn’t really care because the ones that are doing it couldn’t raise their children anyway?

  20. #691612
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:48 pm, emjem24 said:

    zeroangel said:

    emjem24:

    I was just a tad surprised. I remember you being one of the more vocal pro-life folks. I have to admit I did not expect to hear that your husband has more or less identical views to me on the matter. Does he also support ESCR? Why or why not?

    (Might as well threadjack, it’s past the point of no return anyhow. I’ll be sure and bring up evolution and maybe even god later).

    I’m a very vocal pro-lifer. My husband isn’t. He’s more of a pragmatist on the abortion issue. I have no idea what ESCR is so you’ll have to clue me in on that (my accronym guide is not working today). He’s more of a moderate than me on certain issues. Hey, people do marry those of polar opposite beliefs, religions, and personalities.

    Please, Dear God, don’t bring up evolution (please don’t hit me!!!). :oops:

    PS. Awww cute doggie!

    They get bigger. :grin: Pugs are the perfect antidote to a downer of a day. They do shed so you get to take a little bit of them with you every day (not in a creepy Angelina Jolie wearing blood in a necklace sort of way).

  21. #691617
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:50 pm, zeroangel said:

    sambo:

    Are you purposely being facetious? Was that a serious question? What exactly is a “moderate pro-lifer” and how are they different from a “moderate pro-choice” person?

    IIRC, you have been in threaads where I clearly spelled out my position (recall the whole analog vs. digital thing).

    That should answer your question.

  22. #691621
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:51 pm, Snowfire said:

    Side-stepping the discussion of dogs and abortion… I’ve been reading all the postings today regarding Sarah Palin vs. Obama and how they were promoted or not promoted by the media and liberals, I thought of a comparison.

    The liberals and media don’t want a genuine, regular person to hold public office, let alone a national office. Sarah Palin is a genuine person, open about her convictions and puts her “warts” on public display and won’t lie about them.

    The liberals and media want an image, a facade. Sort of a “Portrait of Dorian Gray” mentality. They are willing to spend millions on lawyers or whatever is needed to keep the door locked to the closet that holds the evil portrait.

  23. #691624
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:52 pm, zeroangel said:

    emjem24:

    ESCR

    Don’t worry, I no longer have any interest in trying to explain evolution on this site anymore.

  24. #691628
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:55 pm, emjem24 said:

    John Deaux said:

    Are they zombie pugs?

    John, stop it!!! Do you hear me? Do you know what you’ve done? Now it’s a guarantee that Chaps WILL bring about a zombie revolution. :-)

    My two (1 girl and 1 boy) are definitely not zombies. They are my instant stranger danger, Fedex/UPS delivery guy, meterologist, and bunny rabbit detectors.

    Now if I could only get them to get me my shoes, run some errands for me and kill bugs, I’d be all set.

  25. #691632
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, spaceycakes said:

    OH! Chap–are you a cat person?

  26. #691635
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:56 pm, zeroangel said:

    Snowfire:

    Actually, I *DO* want a genuine person in office. However, the realities of politics more or less do not encourage “genuineness.”

    I most assuredly DO NOT want a “regular” person in office. Whoever holds the highest office in the country should be much more qualified, educated, and experienced then any “regular” person.

    Now before anyone goes apesh|t, I am not saying I think Obama fits that bill.

  27. #691638
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, chapoutier said:

    OH! Chap–are you a cat person?

    That depends. Which answer will NOT lead to a creepy TMI conversation like you had with right4life?

  28. #691639
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:58 pm, emjem24 said:

    cicerokid said:
    Puppies! Like my Char-pei?

    Cicero, Murtha’s an insult to all Char-peis. Ick.

  29. #691641
    On April 30th, 2009 at 4:59 pm, Jeddite said:

    I would not describe myself as either “pro life” or “pro choice” because the abortion issue, despite the best efforts of BOTH SIDES, is NOT a black & white issue. Such labels serve little purpose outside of the proponents of either side branding those who do not share their view, and does not further the debate by any constructive means.

    Im commenting so much today. Must be a combination of slow Thursday and my own zeal for Sarah Palin.

  30. #691642
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, cicerokid said:

    You’ll have convinced me on evolution, Zero, once you have evolved into a human.

    Partial-birth abortion deprives one (the abortee) of the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.

    Palin holds these truths to be self-evident.

  31. #691644
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:00 pm, sambo said:

    zeroangel said:
    sambo:

    Are you purposely being facetious? Was that a serious question? What exactly is a “moderate pro-lifer” and how are they different from a “moderate pro-choice” person?

    No. It wasn’t facetious. A definition of a moderate pro-choice is easy. I just never heard/thought of a moderate pro-lifer.

  32. #691650
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:03 pm, spaceycakes said:

    um, my initial response wasn’t to right4life…it was a response to undre etc’s post of how wonderful she was…

    I was showing how on the interwebs you can say you are anything…

  33. #691653
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:05 pm, zeroangel said:

    cicerokid:

    Do we need another F bomb today? Do I have restate for the millionth time that I am strongly against anything in the 3rd trimester? (Which obviously means I am against partial birth)

    sambo:

    As Jeddite points out, these labels are unclear and just obfuscate the debate. It is enough to say one is “moderate” on the topic and leave it at that.

  34. #691659
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, emjem24 said:

    chapoutier said:
    I suppose a cat person should probably just stay right out of this conversation.

    Does your cat do tricks?

    sambo said:

    I thought cats like rodents?

    Ouch!! Ohhhh…that’ll leave a mark.

    zeroangel said:
    Dogs and cats are great. Especially with ketchup, even my pet dog and cat agree on that point.

    That’s just not right. Where did the love go?

    My thoughts:

    I think I’ve done a fine job of redirecting the conversation, don’t you?

  35. #691661
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:09 pm, sambo said:

    Jeddite said:
    I would not describe myself as either “pro life” or “pro choice” because the abortion issue

    I saw the post earlier and was wondering what a moderate pro lifer would think…I’m not sure if you made it or not. But I was just fishing for your opinion becaused I disagreed with the ‘US law’ arguement. No other motive Jeddite.

  36. #691663
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:10 pm, chapoutier said:

    Does your cat do tricks?

    Does waking me up at 4:30 in the morning for food count?

  37. #691664
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, spaceycakes said:

    What Chinese zodiac animal are you, chap?

  38. #691666
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:12 pm, emjem24 said:

    zeroangel said:
    emjem24:

    ESCR

    Don’t worry, I no longer have any interest in trying to explain evolution on this site anymore.

    Got ya. I’m against it but I think that my husband doesn’t mind it. I don’t like the implications of the research but I think my husband, like many Americans, don’t give it a lot of thought.

    And thank you for sparing us another evolution discussion. You’ve saved countless heads exploding today.

  39. #691668
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:13 pm, zeroangel said:

    Chap:

    Does waking me up at 4:30 in the morning for food count?

    No. My unborn son already does that and his whole universe is still a warm bag of water.

  40. #691669
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:14 pm, chapoutier said:

    What Chinese zodiac animal are you, chap?

    Apparently, snake.

  41. #691674
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:16 pm, zeroangel said:

    emjem24:

    And thank you for sparing us another evolution discussion. You’ve saved countless heads exploding today.

    *smile* Honestly, I do feel terrible for you guys, but I tried my best.

  42. #691676
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, sambo said:

    zeroangel said:
    Don’t worry, I no longer have any interest in trying to explain evolution on this site anymore.

    Thank God! its a Holy subject.

  43. #691677
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, sambo said:

    meaning full of holes!

  44. #691678
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, Jeddite said:

    There’s still time to go off on a 100-comment gay marriage tangent. Virtually guaranteed to drive Jeddite [more] insane, albeit quietly.

  45. #691679
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:17 pm, Snowfire said:

    zeroangel #220

    Actually, I *DO* want a genuine person in office. However, the realities of politics more or less do not encourage “genuineness.”

    That is exactly what is wrong with politics as usual today.

    I most assuredly DO NOT want a “regular” person in office. Whoever holds the highest office in the country should be much more qualified, educated, and experienced then any “regular” person.

    I think that regular people can be and are just as, if not more, educated and experienced than “rock stars.” They are for dang sure more honest.

  46. #691680
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:18 pm, zeroangel said:

    sambo:

    Dont you mean “unholy?” *smile*

  47. #691682
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:19 pm, emjem24 said:

    chapoutier said:

    Does waking me up at 4:30 in the morning for food count?

    Ummm… isn’t that more biology and survival instinct? I hope your cat doesn’t ever present you with a dead rodent. I had that happen to me once and put my lot in with the rodent community ever since then.

    My male pug shrieks like a banshee when he’s not happy and barks aggressively at meteriologists because he developed an acute dislike of them at an early age. I don’t particularly like weather men/women myself. They’re usually wrong about all their forecasts.

    Yes, I know, my male pug has issues. I’m sure my female pug would agree. Her trick? She sits and looks pretty.

  48. #691688
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:20 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Aw, c’mon, chap–the animals are not viewed that way in the far east…to quote AbFab, ‘try not to be so western in your thinking’

  49. #691689
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, zeroangel said:

    Snowfire:

    We might be using a different definition of “regular.”

    What I mean, is I can’t stand how politicians fall all over themselves to prove that they are “just regular, humble folks from poor beginnings.” “Just your run-of-the-mill, folksy, non ‘elite’”

    I don’t want that. I want a successful, well-educated and affluent person; someone with a doctorate and a house in the Hamptons that he built with money from his company.

    Unfortunately, those people are mostly busy running their own companies, conducting research, or otherwise doing something they consider to be more worthwhile then politics.

  50. #691690
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:22 pm, sambo said:

    zeroangel said:
    sambo:

    Dont you mean “unholy?” *smile*

    I was saying it was holy for you!
    (you must have missed my follow up).

  51. #691691
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:23 pm, chapoutier said:

    Aw, c’mon, chap–the animals are not viewed that way in the far east…to quote AbFab, ‘try not to be so western in your thinking’

    Now I have no idea what you are talking about. That was an earnest answer before.

  52. #691695
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, zeroangel said:

    sambo:

    I see. Unfortunately, this is not how I feel. In fact, in some ways I wish it weren’t true.

    I do understand how that doesn’t jive with your caricature of an atheist though.

  53. #691696
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:24 pm, spaceycakes said:

    ok, so what mo/day/year?

  54. #691698
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:26 pm, chapoutier said:

    ok, so what mo/day/year?

    Heh. February 14. You can extrapolate the possible years from my previous answer.

  55. #691699
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:27 pm, zeroangel said:

    Chap:

    I think spacey felt that your use of “apparently” was meant to convey a distaste with the fact that your Chinese zodiac symbol is a snake.

  56. #691702
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, emjem24 said:

    chapoutier said:

    Apparently, snake.

    A snake is a Zodiac sign? The Chinese need to worship the pug. The pugs would make them happier people.

    I could say something about a certain professional industry that Chaps works in and that we all know and love but I’ll refrain.

    I’m sorry, Chaps. Maybe in the next life you’ll be something more adorable than a snake. That’s just too self-fulfilling.

  57. #691703
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, Snowfire said:

    zeroangel #243

    I agree with you on that assessment except for one thing. A person doesn’t have to be affluent and living in the Hamptons to know which way is up and right from wrong.

  58. #691705
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:28 pm, chapoutier said:

    I think spacey felt that your use of “apparently” was meant to convey a distaste with the fact that your Chinese zodiac symbol is a snake.

    No, just that I had never looked into it.

    I sure hope the chinese zodiac does not also need my social security number and bank routing and account number to make its predictions.

  59. #691708
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:29 pm, zeroangel said:

    Snowfire:

    This is true, but affluence is generally a fair estimate of success. Besides, there are other nice places to live, not just the Hamptons.

  60. #691711
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:31 pm, spaceycakes said:

    lol chap; 1977?

  61. #691714
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:32 pm, Jeddite said:

    Too much affluence is can be an undesirable factor. Case in point: the Kennedy Family. Does anybody think the Kennedy family is just that much more non-regular than the rest of America? What are the qualifications for some of the Kennedys serving in office except for being a Kennedy?

  62. #691716
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:33 pm, emjem24 said:

    Jeddite said:
    There’s still time to go off on a 100-comment gay marriage tangent. Virtually guaranteed to drive Jeddite [more] insane, albeit quietly.

    Ummmm… don’t give them any ideas, okay? It’s about cats, dogs, abortion, and Sarah Palin and nothing more. ;-)

  63. #691720
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:35 pm, zeroangel said:

    Jeddite:

    Clearly, in matters of inherited wealth the model is flawed. This is why I said:

    a house in the Hamptons that he built with money from his company.

    I should have been clearer and said:

    a house in the Hamptons that he built with money from his own company, which he also built.

  64. #691723
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:36 pm, sambo said:

    zeroangel said:
    sambo:

    I see. Unfortunately, this is not how I feel. In fact, in some ways I wish it weren’t true.

    Will catch up sometime. I am going outside with my daughter to help he evolve into a good basketball player!

  65. #691730
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:38 pm, zeroangel said:

    sambo:

    Will catch up sometime.

    How about we don’t? How about we let this one die right here? Enjoy the time with your daughter.

  66. #691735
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, spaceycakes said:

    emjem24 said:

    And you far-eastern zodiacal animal…

    The year is important chap!

  67. #691736
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, chapoutier said:

    Night all. I am off to my technology-less purgatory.

  68. #691737
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:39 pm, sambo said:

    ok. deal. thanks. Have a good evening!

  69. #691739
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:40 pm, chapoutier said:

    Yes 1977.

    I wait eagerly for your report as to what this means.

  70. #691742
    On April 30th, 2009 at 5:42 pm, spaceycakes said:

    See? You’re not a Snake. The wonderful year of the Dragon was not over until February 17.

    Not that a Snake isn’t a good sign.

    But Dragon is far better.

    Sleep well, little Shen Long.

  71. #691781
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:12 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    If he was born after Feb 17 in 1977 he’s a snake. I myself am a Dragon, please tell me he was born later in ‘77! :)

  72. #691788
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:14 pm, spaceycakes said:

    not if he was born on Valentine’s Day.

    Ah, Aloha–you weren’t born in ‘76 were you??

  73. #691789
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:15 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Oh no, I just saw the Feb 14…

  74. #691792
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:16 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    Ah, Aloha–you weren’t born in ‘76 were you??

    ‘88. Haha. Not really.

  75. #691795
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Oh my word.

    Is there anyone here who remembers, say, the 1972 Munich Olympics? The Bicentennial?? Woodstock?

  76. #691804
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:27 pm, granite said:

    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Oh my word.

    Is there anyone here who remembers, say, the 1972 Munich Olympics? The Bicentennial?? Woodstock?

    Yes, yes and yes.

    Also the first moon landing, Chappaquiddick, the first Earth Day,
    the King and both Kennedy assassinations, Alan Shepherd’s first suborbital flight, and the Kennedy-Nixon election (the last three faintly; the last two very faintly).

  77. #691809
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    I remember all of those though I was though Woodstock meant nothing to me at the time as I was just a kid.

  78. #691810
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:30 pm, spaceycakes said:

    ooo, granite…you may be older than I am…I remember most of those. I remember Eisenhower’s funeral.
    I remember Robert & MLK’s assasinations. I was the same age as John Jr. at his dad’s funeral.

  79. #691811
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:31 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    And my mother allowed me to stay up and watch the moon landing in 69. Normally we were in bed at that time but she felt it was kind of special.

  80. #691815
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:35 pm, spaceycakes said:

    We watched the moon landing in school, and hey–remember the earth day flags?? LOL. Also, remember where the ‘peace’ sign originated?

  81. #691819
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:39 pm, flmom said:

    I think I’m going to change my ID to Methuselah, I remember Winston Churchill’s funeral.

  82. #691826
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:45 pm, AlohaGuy said:

    I think I’m going to change my ID to Methuselah, I remember Winston Churchill’s funeral.

    Remember the time that actor was hiding in your barn and the cops came looking for him? John Wilkes something…

  83. #691827
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:47 pm, cicerokid said:

    Dragon, Snake? Is this the kung-fu panda thread?

    I am a tiger. Spacey-cake, kinda figured you for a rabbit. In heals.

  84. #691834
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:53 pm, Brian Paasch said:

    Never had a reason to get a twitter account.
    Until now.

  85. #691844
    On April 30th, 2009 at 7:11 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    Dragon, Snake, Rabbit…

    It all sounds like a lot of BULL to me!

  86. #691898
    On April 30th, 2009 at 8:02 pm, flmom said:

    AlohaGuy said:

    Now I’m officially outed as a codger. LOL

  87. #691997
    On April 30th, 2009 at 11:12 pm, Living in the PSRK said:

    Please don’t make fun of me because I was born in the year of the Pig. Probably why I think “Flying Pig” flu is a good moniker and don’t eat pork. Not into cannabalism. (Besides God said not to eat ‘em.)

    And it’s not Porkulus Bill, it’s the Rahm-it-Down-Americas-Throat-Self-stimulus Package. So there.

    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:27 pm, granite said:
    On April 30th, 2009 at 6:20 pm, spaceycakes said:

    Oh my word.

    Is there anyone here who remembers, say, the 1972 Munich Olympics? The Bicentennial?? Woodstock?
    Yes, yes and yes.

    Also the first moon landing, Chappaquiddick, the first Earth Day,
    the King and both Kennedy assassinations, Alan Shepherd’s first suborbital flight, and the Kennedy-Nixon election (the last three faintly; the last two very faintly).

    Me, too. Except for the last two. I was too busy learning about the laws of gravity and self-control to worry about politics and esoteric science.

    And I voted for McCain because of Palin. Still have campaign buttons with just her on them hanging from my rearview mirror.

    And I hope she runs in 2012, but I don’t blame her if she wants to have a private life with her kids and new grandson – as opposed to living in the WH toilet, er, fishbowl.

  88. #692005
    On April 30th, 2009 at 11:27 pm, WarEagle82 said:

    In the end I did not vote for McCain although the Palin selection made me think about it very briefly. But then McCain opened his mouth a day later and I realized it was a stunt and that Palin would have little to no influence in his administration. This is the first election in 30 years that I didn’t vote GOP. But, I knew I would never vote for John McCain back in 2003.

  89. #692057
    On May 1st, 2009 at 1:44 am, Divapalooza said:

    Thanks for letting us know that Sarah Palin was on Twitter! Yay! :]

  90. #692231
    On May 1st, 2009 at 10:41 am, spaceycakes said:

    cicerokid said:

    a tiger, eh? Well that’s okay…Rush is a Tiger.

    I’m a Rat. The first animal of the 12 year cycle. I got there first by my wits.

    Heh; I’m married to a Rabbit. lol

  91. #692611
    On May 1st, 2009 at 3:13 pm, DannoJyd said:

    WarEagle82, so you are one of the people that gave us the Obamanation. How happy you must be today. /sarc

    Yes, McAmnesty sucks, but after considering the alternative I knew that staying home would be wrong, so instead I worked to get Palin elected.

    What will you now do to get America the real leaders it needs. Stay home again, work on more excuses for allowing the leftists to ruin the U.S., or sign up as a GOP volunteer?

    Those that can, do.

  92. #694681
    On May 5th, 2009 at 1:34 pm, FirstSkirt said:

    Thanks, DannoJyd. I,too, wanted Palin to win in spite of McCain. I voted for McCain just to have Sarah in the VP slot. For all the rhetoric on this thread about “regular” people. I’d just love to see someone in office with real, honest COMMON SENSE AND INTEGRITY who would support term limits.

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Legal Insurrection

» NY Times Names Names

Pundit & Pundette

» Not a huge victory

HotAir GreenRoom